User talk:SamuraiClinton

332:

in articles on Michigan roads (having written or edited a fair number of them). The little bits of information in poorly named articles aren't much use if no one finds them because of the name or that can't understand them because there isn't enough context provided. I think it'd be much better to try to incorporate the information into existing articles, or perhaps into more substantial new articles that address many of the stub topics (like perhaps something like

722:

basic facts that were easily obtainable with a quick Google search. Before putting fingers to keyboard, do a bit of research first. That's all I'm asking. If you're for real, and I hope you are, please take my advise. Now that it's expanded a bit, why not research the subject a bit more and expand it further? That should help you get a better feel for what goes on here. Have a great weekend...signing off for now. Remember: You can

1583:

advice on an in-person project of yours? Think about it. Also, keep in mind that I have nothing personal against you nor am I trying to discourage you from anything other than conforming to the rules. In fact, I'm miffed at the individual who put you up on the admin nomination page while this is being sorted out. BTW, if you want a more personal and direct response from this end, drop me an e-mail. I'll get it at work. Best,

630:. Surely there's some subject(s) you care deeply enough about to either expand a current article or to begin one on something that is of broader interest than the one about the Sesame Street parody. I've been here about a year and I really don't have a lot of original articles to my credit, but the ones I have done are of general interest. A eBay user in Australia (I'm in Southern California) recently cribbed part of my 2941: 2841: 2738: 2395: 2451: 2155: 1976: 1685: 287:. There are at least two problems with stubs like these: 1) no one refers to these entities by these names and 2) these entities are entirely unremarkable on their own and descriptions of them belong in the context of related articles (like I-75, I-69, ot M-78). These sub-stubs with invented names (replete with nearly unintelligible language usage) are starting to become annoying. 2101: 1900: 1824: 1773: 2256: 177:? Many of the things you've written are inaccurate or made-up in some way. Many of the articles you write get deleted, and many more need to be rewritten or heavily edited. You're welcome to contribute here, but up until now your contributions have been problematic. I'm sorry to be so blunt with you but you're creating a lot of work for other people. 2794: 2688: 2643: 2596: 2549: 1615:. He happens to be an administrator. He's also on the verge of blocking you. This is my final plea. Stop it or lose your editing privileges, perhaps permanently. That means all sockpuppet accounts and all of your IP addresses will be hard-banned. Period. No turning back. The process has begun. It's up to you to stop it. - 538:

you're just a victim of circumstance. Make no mistake: we don't enjoy ganging up on people. We don't do it without cause. If you want your presence here to be appreciated, you have to work at it a little. Don't expect other people to happily clean up your mistakes. Don't create pages on a whim. If you have nothing to say,

1369:

are completely different. A hoax is an attempt to trick an audience into believing that something false is real -- a practical joke. Fraud is more of a crime to steal money. Therefore, I strongly disagree that they should be merged into one article. Besides, there is enough content on each of them to

902:

OK, then...all you have to do is a bit of research beforehand like I suggested before. You could have easily Googled the phrase and added a bit more than what you recalled from memory. Same with that "Men In Black" substub I just stumbled on. If it helps, remember this: Keep the end user in mind.

721:

I don't really doubt your intentions. That's why I'm trying to guide you, harsh as it may seem. It isn't always easy to express that in writing. I'm not an admin so I can't block you. Nor would I if you were doing the right thing. If you take a look at the article now, another editor added a few

602:

You seem to be very enthusiastic about Knowledge, and I commend you for your politeness while dealing with those of us who frequent VfD -- some of us (myself included) can get quite cranky, or just simply terse. If you learn from the links above, and concentrate on editing the topics you know well, I

307:

They are not much use if they lack content and nobody is able to find them. I think you have the potential to be a good editor here, but there have been a lot of problems with your articles up to this point. I think you should try editing existing articles (instead of creating your own) until you get

1582:

edit history and read your edit aloud. Frankly, it makes no sense. I realize this is a volunteer effort and we're all separated by distance, but the internet literally puts us all in the same room together. Ask yourself: Would you want a well-meaning but totally disruptive individual who ignores

1429:

Since you seem to enjoy roads and highways, I thought you might want to sneak a peek at my latest article. La Cienega is really notable, I used to drive it often and I was surprised to find a red link. I also took this as an opportunity to show you what a short road article should look like. What

713:

A quick Google would be more than enough to provide you the basic information to create this article. Even without Googling, I can tell you that the medley is from the musical "Hair" by Andrew Lloyd Webber and was performed by the 5th Dimension. Putting down some malformed substub, slapping a stub

331:

I didn't mean to imply that you should stop writing altogether. I agree with Rhobite's advice. I also think you have the potential to become a good contributor here. There are plenty of other road geeks here. I'm not exactly a road geek, per say, more of a Michigan geek, and as such have an interest

299:

Listen, I am trying to have the best intentions for Knowledge nowadays. I am a roadgeek, road historan and whatsoever. These stubs and substubs that I generated are not meant to annoy anyone, they are here for historical value and retroactive curiousity about freeway construction projects from the

1577:

Agree completely with Android79. Weird, unencyclopedic edits and articles despite repeated advice from other users who've offered nothing but help coupled with possible sockpuppetry and your refusal to answer all but the most basic concerns is causing a real mess. To answer your comment regarding

1152:

Dude, you're really pushing it. Listen to your old pal. I think you could be a terrific asset but you keep on doing things that will get you banned. Users have been banned for far less than what you've done. You're starting to tick off administrators which means the bureaucrats are going to sit

1101:

years ago." In fact, take a look at the main article. It's written that way in Lincoln's own hand. Actually, what you've done is a pretty good redirect to the main article. While it's likely that someone might type the phrase searching for the Gettysburg Address, it just isn't an article on its

521:

This thing about Chevy Chase's Club Roast show is that I thought the name for his show was a funny one, and I thought it would be worth making an article about; I feel bad for you proposing to ban me from Knowledge on the VfD page for that article I made. Just because pages I make have VfD dosen't

537:

right now. If you're honest in wanting to be a valuable Wikipedian, then my apologies for suggesting that you be banned. But it's hard to believe that after all this time, after so many of your articles have been nominated for deletion, after you have shown no signs of changing your behavior, that

200:

No, I don't think you should make those up either. Please stick to actual words and phrases. It's pointless to make up your own phrases, since they'll get deleted. It doesn't matter whether it has a space in it or not. If you're interested in writing articles which are actually needed, please see

854:

I'm interested in the fact that this article doesn't even make sense. The US and European... Well, ANY outside of Japan-released Nintendo Entertainment Systems did not even have VERTICAL loading slots. Nintendo Entertainment System uses horizontal loading slots and doesn't have a cartridge eject

1599:. These both came after my rather generous offer to help you out of this mess. No more. I am going to put up a request for arbitration at this point, assuming an administrator doesn't blow your editing privileges clear out of the water beforehand. You blew it big time, Sam. Ride's over. - 1270:. For your information: Notice how I bolded "Micropolis Corporation" in the first sentence in the article. This is part of the style of writing encyclopedia: you bold the main subject in the first sentence. Next, look at the second paragraph and notice how I really paraphrased a paragraph from 970:

Yes, please. We've all been patient and helpful since you seem to be very enthusiastic about this site. For that, we thank you. However, a lot of what you're doing is highly disruptive. This latest article is an excellent example. Unless they're particularly notable, single episodes of TV

649:

of your nicknames when discussing your articles on VfD because you have variously used three different names to sign your edits, and they're different enough from each other that other users might get confused. I'm only doing this so those that may remember the "GoofyGuy" nickname from earlier

191:

I do not think of bogus additions to Knowledge like I used to; I am trying to avoid neologisms and I am trying to use existing words. If I think of a setup of 2 words separated by a space, I don't think of them as neologisms. Will you accept terms that use existing words separated by a space

1521:

You've gone and done it again. Haven't you read a single word any of us have typed? Once again, you have created a non-article because of your continued refusal to research your subject before writing about it. I have been patient. I have been nice. However, if you create just

355:

and put anything that would go on I-75 there. I'm thinking of doing the same for I-95 and Rhode Island. As for the easiest way to clean these up, you wrote them, so just copy and paste the contents into the I-75 and I-69 articles, and put {{db|moved to I-75}} on the page. --a

714:

notice on it and hoping that someone cleans up after you is, quite frankly, poor etiquette. I could expand this, but I'm going to let you do it. Your behavior is running you the very real risk of banishment from further editing on this site. Please do the right thing. -

958:

Please, add context to your articles. For example, your article on "Cartman's Silly Hate Crime" never mentions the TV series it's an episode of. Have you ever considered editing existing articles rather than creating new ones? You might get better results that way. Yours,

2762:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

855:

button. If you are referring to the Japanese model, you should have stated it as the Famicom (or Family Computer), not NES. And if you're not from Japan, you probably bought a fake NES. Did you know the NES is the most cloned console in existance?

2421:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1052:

In short, Knowledge is much better served if you add what you know to existing articles, unless the subject is large enough to warrant its own article. Individual songs, individual episodes of TV shows, and jokes and pop-culture references are

1080:

My friend, you are right on the verge of being drummed off this site. I don't want to see that happen. If you continue to treat this site in the way you have been, it's a certainty. Android brings up perfect reasons as to why. The

944:

Again, it's spelled "occurrences". Not "occurances", and not "occurences". Two R's and zero A's. May I suggest that you download a spellchecker for your preferred browser, such as ieSpell for IE or Spellbound for Firefox? Thank you.

465:). Deletionists don't like these, and even some inclusionists barely tolerate them. If you want to see your stuff stay, I recommend adding to larger articles wherever possible, including taking care of the current matters on VFD. -- 812:

You seem to be creating a new process for suggesting pages that should be disambiguated. I don't think this is a good idea. Why do you think Knowledge needs this new process? I'm concerned that it may be an example of

1068:

Knowledge is not IMDb, which can easily be used (and is more suited) to providing complete soundtrack listings for pretty much every movie ever made. Would you care to address any of the other points I've brought up?

1926: 1850: 2425:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -

971:

programs aren't considered encyclopedic. This is another example of information that's better served and presented at the main South Park article or perhaps the list of South Park episodes. OK? Deal? Friends? -

2766:

1430:

I did was simple. I combined what I already knew like you do but I added info I found with a quick Google on the history of the boulevard as an incomplete freeway. In a few minutes, I had a decent short article

2350:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2759: 1335:

are both small enough – and not likely to grow much larger – that it's only natural to merge them into the main article on the city. The "there's a merge directive there already" excuse is pretty meaningless

935:

I'd rather if you used complete sentences instead of simply adding lists of trivia to articles. But if you absolutely must form your additions into lists, please spell "occurrences" correctly. Thank you.

582:

As others have already pointed out, many of your articles get nominated for VfD because they don't really fit the mold for what subjects are covered in Knowledge. If you haven't already, carefully read

2115: 1116:

The vote was not redirect and merge. VFDs last 5 days, but given what's been voted so far, it's a clear keep. Please do not unilaterally impose decisions that have strong consensus against them. --

133:

A 'tertiary interstate', if the term is even used outside WP, is not a 3DI that spurs from a 3DI. If anything, it is simply another term for a 3DI. That itself only seems to be used on Knowledge (

817:. Have you discussed this with anyone else? It would be good to get consensus on whether this is necessary. If other people agree that it is necessary, they can help to build the pages for it. 1397:

Anyway, even though they are similar, many people regard them as separate topics. Again, a hoax is more of a practical joke while fraud is a crime to trick people into giving away their money.

525:

One reason why I make some articles is because my mind runs out of ones that would have enough significance to be kept; but having contributions with VfDs shouldn't spark any suspicion on me!

894:

to add more to an article besides half-finished sentences. Your last two entries are speedy-deletion candidates as they stand. Please take another look at the tutorials if you need to. -

1788: 2316: 603:

think you could become a valuable contributor. However, if you continue to create and edit articles in the way you are doing so now, I can only see frustration for both of us. Good luck.

1914:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 1838:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 1275: 2703: 1925:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

1849:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

529:

Frankly, I get the impression you're just having a bit of fun with us. I've been watching your edits for a while, and "Club Roast" isn't your first spurious article. In fact, I count

2658: 2611: 2806: 1189:. I think it would be better if you did a little research about the company and see if you can make it to and article... or at the very least make it a stub. Just a suggestion. 2564: 844: 434: 276: 1327:

is a large-enough concept that it might deserve an article on its own; I'm not sure about that, since I know very little about Detroit, but it's a good, long article. The

1310: 169:

I know that you're the person who vandalized Knowledge with a bunch of neologisms a while back. Let's put that in the past. Could you please stop creating articles like

1243:, the Internet archive? I believe if you enter Micropolis' old website www.micropolis.com into the wayback machine search engine, you can get some info on the company. 661:

Changing your nickname wouldn't have prevented you from being banned. It's quite easy to tell which edits belong to which usernames, regardless of how they are signed.

1791:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 1595:

I am through. Through. I admit Hitler isn't my favorite historical figure but that horrendous pop culture reference was too much. Ditto the utterly useless one at

591:. (Keep in mind that the latter link is not yet Knowledge policy, only a general guideline, but parts of it may be in the future.) I know you already have a hang of 2118:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 1498: 1536:

That "Freddy Got Fingered" thing was vandalism. Sorry, pal. I tried as have many other users and in response you've chosen to rub everyone's face in the muck. -

136: 90:

Three-digit Interstates are allowed to connect to their parents indirectly, via another one of the same parent. I have added something in the intro about this. --

1563: 1162: 546:

and just develop a familiarity with the rules so you know what we expect from you. You seem to have a lot of knowledge, but you have to learn where it belongs.

1699:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's 1639:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "

1410:

However, I will admit that there are enough hits on Google about "Fraudulent hoax" that we could possibly make an article out of it. Is that ok with you?

2418: 1110: 280: 1655:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the 2749: 2407: 1730:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

879:

for info). By assigning a category, you help make sure your new articles don't get lost as 'orphans' that are not associated with related topics.

65: 744:*a short time after PWaRS was made, some funk song that interpolated parts from it with the recurring quote "standing on the top" was made; if a 115:

Please stop adding stuff about this road. It has not existed and there are no current plans for it. It doesn't even make sense where you put it (

3004: 2904: 2518: 2310: 2280: 2218: 2055: 1735: 1660: 116: 49: 1559:

are not one and the same. You have the same writing style, edit/create the same kinds of articles, and support one another's articles on VfD.

1911: 1893: 1835: 1817: 2375: 284: 2288: 2239: 999:

a word before you use it in an article. It's obvious you've since realized your mistake, but now we have a nearly-useless redirect from

685:

articles you just added that category to. No doubt relevent to Louisiana culture, but not specifically New Orleans. Hope this helps, --

84: 25:

to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

2802: 2786: 2681: 2636: 2589: 2542: 316:

too. Simple names are almost always better than long ones, and many times you don't even have to create a new article. You could edit

988:

Adding "jokes" and pop-culture references to well-established articles. It's great that Beavis started masturbating in front of the

543: 433:

Since you created this before creating your account, you probably don't have it on your watchlist - just letting you know that it's

126:

doesn't appear to be anything except a weird joke. Don't create stuff like that, and definitely don't link to it in other articles.

69: 2292: 2283:

to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:

2133: 2078: 1803: 1758: 1700: 3008: 2908: 2522: 2371: 2222: 2089: 2059: 1889: 1813: 1739: 1704: 1664: 1640: 821: 619: 333: 230: 206: 560:

Although other users may disagree, I've always considered it bad form to vote on your own page's VfD. If you choose to do so,

1724: 123: 68:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

1093:. BTW, the proper way of writing something like that does not involve good old Arabic numerals, but the words for them: " 867:

Good work creating new articles. When you create things, it helps tremendously to assign them to an accurate category (see

387:

articles. In the meantime, I don't have additional advice to offer beyond the excellent advice you've already received. -

478: 396: 309: 134: 2260: 596: 564:

sign the page with your own username (not "Goofy Guy"), or people may suspect you're trying to cast a sock puppet vote.

534: 415: 403: 313: 266:

REPLY: I am sorry, now I know not to do verbatim copying from copyrighted websites; now I will only do different setups.

202: 34: 22: 2362:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2298: 2996: 2952: 2930: 2896: 2852: 2830: 2510: 2462: 2367: 2210: 2166: 2144: 2047: 1987: 1965: 1799: 1754: 1692: 1636: 634:

article for the auction of his own car! That truly blew my mind to see my own words paraphrased on an eBay auction.

1526:

of these malformed, undercooked articles, I'm going to take this to the next level. You're leaving me no choice. -

3000: 2900: 2514: 2214: 2051: 1907: 1831: 1505: 2753: 2497: 2411: 2276: 2111: 1784: 1780: 1708: 1696: 1678: 1644: 1475:

Apparently this was removed due to my anonymity. I'll have it back up in a few moments when I create an account.

615: 352: 54: 2983: 789:

Shouldn't it have "Knowledge:" at the start of its title?? I moved it there shortly after I saw your first vote.

1328: 1324: 735: 631: 592: 2304: 1562:

Regardless of that, it would behoove you to respond in a more substantial way to the items brought up in your

697:

I have no idea, as I've never used Wiktionary. My guess is that they will unless they're in widespread use. --

1082: 1027: 837: 494:

Also, if you want people to take you seriously, you should sign VFD votes with your own name using 4 tildes.

427: 101:

Hello - some of your writing is a bit hard to understand. Is English your first language, out of curiousity?

2235: 1332: 1014:

Adding links to your own newly-created articles in "See Also" sections in well-established articles. If you

499: 457:

because they are minor subjects that can easily be included in a larger article (like the part of Old 27 in

2948: 2934: 2114:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 223: 1787:. I do not feel that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 1267: 1182: 29: 1668: 1476: 1468: 2883: 1502: 830: 170: 150: 61: 1950:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 1874:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 2809:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

1652: 2458: 2444: 2264: 2129: 2122: 2074: 2067: 1996: 1955: 1915: 1879: 1839: 1423: 1383: 599:

articles, but you might want to read through those as well, to pick up tips you may not be aware of.

588: 2695: 2603: 109: 3019: 3012: 2920: 2912: 2848: 2834: 2820: 2798: 2717: 2625: 2578: 2526: 2363: 2226: 2063: 2039: 2016: 1743: 1716: 1579: 1571: 1345: 1318: 1170: 1145: 1074: 1062: 1008: 989: 666: 655: 608: 301: 193: 1723:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

1651:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

2272: 2263:, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Knowledge's 2230: 2028: 1632: 1217: 1090: 1019: 774: 495: 44: 2402: 2386: 2197: 912:

Of course. I used "Google" generically. Feel free to use whatever search engines you wish. -

2979: 2879: 2744: 2728: 2668: 2493: 2479:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

2339: 2330: 2193: 2024: 1556: 1415: 1402: 1391: 1375: 1291: 1248: 1225: 1206: 1194: 686: 341: 292: 259: 76:

on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

379:

a bit of a road geek. Take a look at my user page to see what I mean. You iz gonna love my

2775: 2650: 2556: 2359: 2343: 1936:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1860:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

963: 827: 814: 798: 248: 174: 77: 2358:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 614:

Samurai, I'd like to give you some friendly and totally unsolicited advice: Read up on the

2471: 2268: 2162: 2148: 1951: 1875: 1487: 1448:

Caltrans as I thought they were. You can still view them at the external link section. -

924: 773:. It does not sample or in any way reference or interpolate "Papa Was a Rolling Stone". -- 770: 384: 236: 794:

How should it be abbreviated to distinguish it from Vfd standing for votes for deletion??

252: 1274:. Now, since this article is a stub, I put {{stub}} in the article. Finally, I attached 847:. Could you please go to that discussion page and explain why this article is valuable.- 650:

discussions realize that SamuraiClinton, GoofyGuy, and TheSamurai are one and the same.

3016: 2916: 2810: 2707: 2615: 2568: 2355: 2347: 1731: 1656: 1616: 1600: 1584: 1567: 1537: 1527: 1449: 1435: 1341: 1314: 1166: 1154: 1141: 1121: 1103: 1070: 1058: 1004: 972: 913: 904: 895: 727: 715: 702: 662: 651: 639: 604: 486: 470: 442: 388: 365: 158: 143: 127: 95: 2960:

Completely unsourced; could not find any significant coverage to establish notability.

1906:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

1830:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

1239:

I still think you can make at least a 1-2 paragraph stub out of it. Have you heard of

514:. Being banned would be a bad thing for me. I know some articles that I made have a 2966: 2866: 2480: 2428: 2351: 2321: 2180: 2107: 2093: 2005: 1983: 1969: 1947: 1940:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

1937: 1930: 1919: 1871: 1864:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

1861: 1854: 1843: 1794: 1749: 1628: 1483: 1464: 584: 454: 317: 39: 1975: 1684: 2664: 1612: 1411: 1398: 1387: 1371: 1287: 1244: 1221: 1202: 1190: 1140:

not what you say it is. This should be treated as vandalism. Do not do this again.

1000: 946: 937: 876: 868: 848: 766: 565: 547: 419: 407: 337: 321: 288: 255: 210: 185: 178: 102: 1313:

regarding your recent edits on the Traverse City articles. Please give it a look.

875:

not sure about categories, at least assign your new articles a stub category (see

2179:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

2004:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

1048:, at least do some research and find out which band it is. Google is your friend. 2965:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

2865:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

2771: 1034: 960: 754: 380: 2174:

Minor, mostly self-explanatory game term. Knowledge is not a gaming dictionary.

2100: 1899: 1823: 1772: 416:

Southern California freeways#Many of the firsts of Southern California freeways

3022: 2924: 2824: 2779: 2721: 2674: 2629: 2582: 2535: 2437: 2379: 2324: 2244: 2138: 2083: 1959: 1883: 1807: 1762: 1671: 1596: 1283: 1161:

Based on this action and other past patterns of behavior, I have written up a

1136:

have the authority to close VfD discussions, especially when the consensus is

921: 758: 745: 2503:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

2203:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

2034:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

1279: 1271: 1186: 1117: 880: 859:. I'm an anonymous user, though I should probably create an account soon... 856: 698: 511: 482: 477:

Actually now that I think about it, you may want to make one article called

466: 438: 361: 154: 139: 91: 149:

Please do not make up terms. Unless you have some offline source, the term

2989:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

2889:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

2807:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 5#Dog bone controller

1165:

regarding your articles and edits. You are invited to add your response.

992:, but that really ought to go into an article about him, don't you think? 518:

on the, but despite of that, I still have good intentions for Knowledge.

357: 2793: 2687: 2642: 2595: 2548: 1201:

Then, I am curious. Why did you create the redirect in the first place?

2530: 522:

mean that I am intentionally making bogus contributions to Knowledge.

2259:

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote,

1927:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of auxiliary Interstate Highways

1851:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of auxiliary Interstate Highways

1220:

and point to me the specific reason you are suggesting here. Thanks.

678: 271:

stubs for things that are not ever referred to by the name you choose

2267:. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be 2760:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Composite monitor (2nd nomination)

2121:

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

1566:. There's a whole section reserved for your response. Use it well. 1362: 1352: 682: 458: 351:

If there's enough information, it might make sense simply to make

2346:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

1578:

the difference between a good edit and a bad one, go back to the

1555:

hard to believe, given the circumstantial evidence, that you and

1102:

own. I'll beseech you once again: Please do the right thing. -

638:

is the kind of power this site can wield. Use it well. Best, -

1463:

I have nominated you for Administrator status. Please go to the

1366: 1356: 1216:

I am not sure I follow you. It might be helpful for you to read

762: 462: 2797:

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect

2116:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Doom Troopers (2nd nomination)

231:

Knowledge:What Knowledge is not#Knowledge is not a crystal ball

843:

I see you created this page, and someone has nominated it for

515: 414:

I merged your "Many of the firsts of Los Angeles freeways" to

2694:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

2649:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

2602:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

2555:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

1667:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 1089:

the sort of thing someone will look up before looking up the

184:

And also, could you please use the edit summary box? Thanks.

2939: 2839: 2686: 2641: 2594: 2547: 2449: 2153: 1974: 1898: 1822: 1771: 1734:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 1683: 1659:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 1611:

You may wish to look at a message left on that talk page by

1482:

It has been re-added. You can accept your nomination on the

1501:

and indicating if you accept or decline the nomination? —

437:. If it's not pure speculation, please provide a source, -- 1711:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the 1647:). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the 995:

Creating misspelled redirects and using them in articles.

1789:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/As seen on TV (marketing)

1497:

suggests you aren't. Either way, would you mind going to

1240: 1703:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " 1276:

Category:Defunct computer companies of the United States

320:

instead of creating a new stub about each road feature.

3007:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

2907:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

2742:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2521:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

2400:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2221:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

1494: 247:

Please do not post copyrighted materials to Knowledge.

222:

Please don't create articles that speculate. Example:

2972: