User talk:Santiagokdasilva1

952:

is not a single person. It's a community of thousands of editors who have written the various policies and guidelines that I have linked you to. If someone points out that you're violating policy, it does not matter if it's just one editor; if what they're saying about the policies in question is accurate, then you should acknowledge what they're saying. How many editors have to communicate with you on a given matter before you feel you are required to listen? Two? Ten? Fifty? If you want to join a website, the obligation is on

1323: 1052: 1465: 3498: 3337: 1907: 1500: 1770: 628: 540: 317: 2265: 2143: 3155: 3443: 3252: 2957: 2900: 1726: 1640: 417: 1438: 701: 3124:, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request 739: 269: 1034:

article, but I figured I'd give you an opportunity to argue your case for why Manning qualifies as notable. For now, I'll nominate the article for deletion, and if you cannot provide independent reliable sources that establish his notability, that will probably happen a week from now. If you have any

951:

Again, when you say, "Knowledge accepts what I'm writing", what exactly do you mean by "Knowledge"? What does this mean? Has some consensus of editors on this site indicated that your edits are in full compliance with its policies? Has Knowledge founder Jimmy Wales contacted you personally? Knowledge

1212:

s maiden name. Similarly, Kendall Jenner's surname is Jenner, the name of her father, as she has never been married. Beyonce Knowles' surname is Knowles. The "some reason" for this is that Houghton and Beyincé have never been their names, and you did not provide any source indicating that they were.

928:

You also say that I'm "the only one" who is informing you of this. So what? Are you implying that you get to decide how many editors have to contact you before you decide to acknowledge what they're saying? You don't. Like it or not, you have to follow Knowledge's guidelines and policies, and if you

2978:

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can

2921:

924:

Knowledge, just as you are. By saying "you're not Knowledge", you're implying a disparity that does not exist, since "Knowledge" isn't some inanimate monolith, it's an aggregate community composed of people like me. Since I pointed out the policies and guidelines that you were violating, and linked

1683:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be

1133:

In addition, the Lead section is to be a summary of the article's most salient points, specifically, the things for which a subject is most notable. Things like personal interests or hobbies, if sourced, should go in the Personal life section. Lastly, please do not use dated wording that does not

976:

I did not simply "erase" the article. If you looked at my edits, you'll notice that I cleaned up much of your poor punctuation, spelling, formatting, your insistence on referring to Manning with his given name, added fact tags to the article, etc. I also tried asking you about your viewpoint with

468:

3303:

and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the

3225:

I should like to remind you once again that something given as a name for someone in a Knowledge article must be a name that actually is used for that person. Also, in the English language Knowledge the name given should normally be the name most usually recognised in English. I am aware that in

1694:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can

1240:

You added unsourced information to the article, despite the fact that this was one of the things I mentioned to you that is not permitted on Knowledge, and despite the fact that you were blocked for this. Sticking a "citation needed" tag on unsourced material does not permit you to add it to an

479:

956:

to follow its rules. The obligation is not on all the other people who've been there for years to walk on eggshells around you while you decide you can do whatever you like. I see no evidence that any person or entity on this site has conferred any stamp of approval for your edits, one way or

2274:. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. 2152:. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. 966:

see is that in the seven days that you've been editing here, editors have welcomed you here, offered advice, sometimes offered you polite admonishments as you've begun to familiarize yourself with the site (which is perfectly normal for new editors, mind you), and you've chosen to

3226:

Spanish it is common practice to include a person's mother's maiden name, but no matter what the ethnic background or nationality of a person, if their name is not actually used in that form then that is not the form of the name that should be used in an article about the person.

1102:

No problem. In the future, if others inform you that your edits do not conform to certain policies, and they try to explain those policies to you, please try to heed them. Again, if you ever have any other questions or need help understanding the site's rules, just let me know.

804:.) It is for this reason that I placed the AfD tag on the article, which should not be removed unless you disagree with it on the basis of Knowledge's Notability Guideline. May I ask if you have a valid, policy-based rationale for disagreeing with this, and if so, what it is? 919:

telling you that there is something wrong with your edits because Knowledge is made up of editors and administrators like me whose job it is to inform new editors like yourself that we have rules that you have to follow if you want to edit here. In that sense, people like me

2874:. When you do that you can remove any categories of which the category Uruguayan people of Charrúa descent is a subcategory, such as the categories Uruguayan people and Uruguayan people of indigenous peoples descent. Let me know if you have any questions. 1515:. Any name given to a person in an article must be a name that the person has actually used, not one which you think they should use for some reason (such as that it was their mother's maiden name), if the person has never in fact been known by that name. 290:

located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.

1933:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

3363:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

3284:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 1581: 2985:

to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with

2928:

1696: 481: 1672:, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 1346:, the fifth time you have done this since being blocked for the same offense four months ago. The mikecmanning.com webpage you cited as a source does not mention Manning's year of birth or his city of birth, and the content on 1123:

to the Mike Manning article. Material added to articles must be accompanied by citations of reliable, verifiable sources. Where information on the subject's work and accomplishments is concerned, the sources need to be

1258:

Please familiarize yourself with the policies and guidelines I have mentioned to you above. If you continue to ignore them, you risk being blocked from editing. Please do not make it necessary to do so again. Thanks.

1937:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

3367:

3308:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 3403:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1118:

Hi. Please read the policies that I have previously mentioned to you above. Do not add unsourced material to articles or refer to the subjects of biographical articles by their given name, as you did with

864:

Please do not revert my edits to the article unless you have a valid, policy-based rationale for doing so. In general, you should summarize your edits, and any relevant policies you're citing with an

1213:

Where did you get the idea that their mothers' maiden names were also their daughters'? Where have you ever referred to Kardashian and Jenner referred to as Kendall Houghton or Kim Houghton?

3289: 925:

you to them so that you could read and learn them, on what basis do you ignore my warnings? Are you saying that you don't have to follow the rules when you visit someone else's property?

3512: 781:

sources, that is, those that are independent of the subject. Self-published sources, including websites whose content is user-generated, are not permitted as sources, as indicated at

2290: 2168: 2113:, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our 1244:

You sourced some material to imdb. Again, as I told you above, back on September 5, sites whose content is user-generated, such as imdb, are not considered reliable, under

1930: 1278:

to the Mike Manning article. We've already been over this. If you want to add material to an article, please make sure it is accompanied by a reliable, verifiable source.

33: 842:

If you have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of

3360: 3073: 872:. Knowledge has guidelines that must be followed by those who wish to edit here. If you need help learning how to edit here, I'd be happy to help you. Thank you. 801: 3069: 2065: 2819: 1572:

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include

1023:

sources are not permitted, and that includes the subject's official website. If you read my message above, and these linked policies, you'll understand this.

1195:

Please remember to sign your talk page posts. You can do this by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of them, which will automatically timestamp them too.

971:

these overtures. One message above, for example, explained to you that you need to sign your talk page messages, yet you left one on my talk page unsigned.

2061: 800:. Generally speaking, appearing as a cast member on a season of a reality television show does not make one notable. (An example of precedent for this is 681:

If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —

2815: 2766: 2607: 1832: 600:

If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.

2554: 3349: 3083: 3030: 2829: 2776: 2723: 2713: 2670: 2617: 2564: 2511: 2458: 2405: 2352: 2230: 2075: 2022: 1969: 1919: 1871: 2762: 2603: 3020: 2448: 2342: 2012: 1861: 1585: 2550: 2395: 1503:

Many of your recent edits have added unsourced content which does not seem to be verifiable. For example, can find no evidence anywhere to support

3128:

of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

2709: 1477: 1446: 41: 3016: 2501: 2444: 2338: 2008: 1857: 203: 3285: 3281: 3241: 2946: 2889: 2391: 2220: 1629: 1551: 406: 380: 3162: 3148: 3121: 3109: 3079: 3026: 2825: 2772: 2719: 2666: 2613: 2560: 2507: 2454: 2401: 2348: 2280: 2226: 2158: 2110: 2071: 2018: 1965: 1867: 1828: 56:

or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the

3168:

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply

2497: 1959: 1156:

Try searching for a better source for the material. Sites whose content is user-generated, such as imdb, are not considered reliable, under

3428: 2216: 715:

or was created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider sourcing the article or

829:

We do not embolden the names of article subjects, except in the opening sentence of the Lead, and we do not italicize their names at all.

3517: 2660: 1955: 1798: 1375: 1096: 656: 575: 227: 894:. You are violating Knowledge's policies, and if you continue to ignore them, as well as my messages to you, you run the risk of being 2981: 2924: 655:

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

574:

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

113: 1797:

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

3503: 3489: 2656: 1824: 1607: 2963:

Hello, and welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Knowledge, introducing inappropriate pages, such as

2906:

Hello, and welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Knowledge, introducing inappropriate pages, such as

1138:, specific time references should be used instead. If you have any further questions on these guidelines, let me know. Thank you. 287: 53: 2964: 2950: 2907: 2893: 2124: 286: 52: 47: 46: 1546:

text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section

1400:

citation template/tag. It is redundant to write out the full citation more than once, as you did with the mikecmanning.com cite.

835:

Proper nouns are capitalized. This includes names of people ("mike"), and locations such as washington's sports bar & grill.

3479: 3424: 2257: 2106: 1749: 384: 3186:

code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

3076:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3023:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2867: 2822:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2769:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2716:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2663:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2610:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2557:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2504:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2451:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2398:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2345:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2223:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2068:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2015:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1962:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1864:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 751: 136: 1576:

the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the

154: 1173:

Just out of curiosity, why did you add those surnames to the articles of Kim and Kendall Kardashian and Beyonce Knowles?

898:. Please do not make this necessary. Please acknowledge my messages to you, and comply with the site's rules. Thank you. 3261: 1649: 1535: 426: 108: 3415:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3420: 2120: 1759: 1359: 1080: 716: 617: 529: 508: 471: 372: 328: 306: 208: 929:

ignore administrators when they try to point this out to you, you're going to end up losing your editing privileges.

3193:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:

3475: 3305: 2987: 2968: 2930: 2911: 2871: 1745: 1442: 1354:, making it an unreliable source according to Knowledge's policies. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 759: 458: 396: 376: 232: 3469: 3353: 1923: 1739: 1600: 1481: 1330: 1059: 767: 442: 410: 159: 3525: 3507: 3268: 1656: 606: 433: 1134:

clearly indicate a specific time or time frame to the reader, such as "Manning just wrapped". As indicated by

996:

Sources are also needed for the rest of the material in the article in order to satisfy the site's policy on

3161:

Hello Santiagokdasilva1. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled

3060:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3007:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2806:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2753:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2700:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2647:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2594:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2541:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2488:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2435:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2382:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2329:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1392:

In addition to the above, here are a few other tips that might improve your editing when your block expires.

3061: 2105:

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here:

1686: 1274:

Santiago, please do not add unsourced material to articles, as now see that you did back on January 21 with

743: 635: 621: 462: 758:

of previously published material. Knowledge requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by

3231: 2312: 1700: 1520: 1355: 1076: 485: 183: 103: 98: 838:

Please do not wikilink terms for which there are no articles, such as "now-passed Anti-Hate Crimes Bill".

359: 3510:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

3460: 2190: 1914: 1898: 1421: 1413: 1383: 1309: 1283: 1264: 1218: 1178: 1143: 1108: 1040: 941: 903: 877: 854: 843: 392: 1665: 1633: 3506:

has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the

1591:

While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our

754:. This includes material lacking cited sources, or obtained through personal knowledge or unpublished 3317: 3137: 3129: 2807: 2053: 2000: 1677: 1592: 1543: 1339: 1068: 978: 454: 277: 188: 3344: 3328: 2542: 453:

for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on

3521: 3416: 3187: 2994: 2937: 1802: 1777: 1763: 1619: 1611: 1489: 1454: 1164:

material that you find. If you cannot find reliable sources, then you cannot add it to the article.

1125: 1012: 869: 778: 660: 601: 579: 564:

that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

388: 273: 238: 193: 1403:

The title of the page from mikecmanning.com that you cited is not "Autobiography" but "Biography".

2879: 244: 131: 3304:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

3300: 3277: 3245: 2754: 2595: 2208: 742:

Hi. Welcome to Knowledge, and thanks for working to improve the site with your creation of the

3392: 3383: 3373: 3227: 3211: 3099: 3046: 2972: 2915: 2845: 2792: 2739: 2686: 2633: 2580: 2527: 2474: 2421: 2368: 2308: 2246: 2091: 2038: 1985: 1887: 1813: 1781: 1516: 1397: 1347: 1016: 865: 782: 705: 671: 639: 590: 551: 493: 449:, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see 355: 296: 1823:

If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can

3412: 3396: 3125: 2701: 2186: 1733:. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Knowledge, as you did at 1417: 1379: 1365: 1305: 1279: 1260: 1214: 1174: 1139: 1104: 1086: 1036: 937: 899: 873: 850: 518: 68: 57: 3411:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1445:

information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Knowledge about

3476:

The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.

3313: 3133: 3117: 3008: 2863: 2811: 2705: 2436: 2330: 2294: 2172: 2115: 1849: 1473: 1351: 1254:

You listed Manning's performance skills. Knowledge is an encyclopedia. It is not a resume.

1245: 1157: 1135: 1020: 786: 755: 721: 683: 2383: 3408: 3400: 3309: 2991: 2934: 1734: 1615: 1485: 1450: 1004:"come with the source", as much of the material in the article was missing any sources. 990: 932:

This is your final warning. The next time you violate the site's policies, you will be

823: 797: 547: 533: 450: 324: 310: 1499: 746:

article, as we really appreciate your participation. However, Knowledge cannot accept

3450: 3404: 3090: