Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Sophie

Source 📝

123:
not mistaken, aren't users supposed to be notified when ArbCom investigates them, or when a CU looks in to them? Someone care to provide the diffs to those notifications, or were they never made? I thought this was Knowledge (XXG), not Nazi Germany, because Arbcom is starting to look like the 3rd Reich. (Go ahead, block me for that Risker. It'll REALLY help your case here.)
38: 227:
can someone please just tell me whats going on? I dont know what is going on, and i dont even know what my block is for and i can not say anything or ask any questions because no one is talking to me." Could someone please provide the edit diffs where she was notified about the Arbcom Investigation,
59:
Due to concerns about behaviour and personal information disclosed by the user, a checkuser was requested. Several checkusers reviewed the findings, and all separately confirmed that it appears the user had made significant misrepresentations. The account was blocked, and additional checkuser reviews
225:
Still, it's her AGE that she posted. She posted her AGE. Many many many other editors post their AGE. She said she's willing to talk about her, shall we say colorful, past, but that's no reason to block. I mean, come on. If editors can be blocked for posting their age, I'm sure there are a few
122:
made a block because someone pissed her off, and now she is trying to get Check Users to lie to cover her ass. I've looked (I have seen CU results from other wikis she operates on, nothing alarming), and I see no viable reason for this to have been a ban, let alone to have ArbCom involved. If I'm
118:
You can confirm what findings from CU Hersfold? That she has multiple accounts and probably edited from school a time or 2? This is beginning to look more and more like
185:
It is possible that she was blocked for posting personal information as a minor and the edits oversighted. I'll look for that policy; I remember seeing it somewhere....
168:
Nothing to block you for, AndrewN; I'm really sorry that this is unpleasant for you and the many people who have been kind to and befriended User:Sophie.
32:
User:Sophie, I have blocked your account based on private information and checkuser data. If you wish to discuss or contest this block, please email
352:). I believe Picopa was blocked as a result of whatever is going on here, although he has been unblocked and the block log entry revdeleted. 226:
thousand that need to be blocked right about now. Sophie and I have been talking in IRC about this, and she says quote: " <SophJ: -->
200: 190: 109: 293: 247:
User:Sophie can email Arbcom to request unblock, but my post above does explain the reason for the block.
379: 317: 228:
CU investigation, and also show the CU request and reasoning for it? That might clear a lot up here.
186: 105: 395: 359: 285: 210: 151: 345: 141: 429: 333: 252: 173: 65: 49: 375: 310: 17: 390: 354: 205: 146: 79: 425: 232: 127: 349: 329: 248: 169: 119: 104:'s brother/whatever else, I don't think that is block-worthy. Just my thoughts. 101: 78:
I can confirm these findings as one of the checkusers asked to check into this.
61: 45: 328:
This is being addressed directly with the blocked user. Please relax, folks.
283:
We're all just as confused as you are. Hope this gets sorted out soon!
433: 405: 383: 369: 337: 323: 302: 256: 240: 220: 194: 177: 161: 135: 113: 91: 69: 53: 140:
I have to at least partially agree with AndrewN, but let's stay
374:
Picopa remains blocked as a result of what is going on here.
344:
I'd also like to know what this is about, since I recently
100:
Just read the block reason :( . Even if she isn't 13/isn't
308:
Me too! Sophie did nothing wrong, please tell us and her!
98:
She seemed just fine when I saw her working on RC patrol.
421: 420:
If this user is ever unblocked, they need to explain
388:Ah, correct. I was looking at the wrong log. 8: 348:a user that apparently is her brother ( 7: 60:concur with the original decision. 25: 201:Knowledge (XXG):Child protection 96:You mean she isn't coming back? 36: 416:Interfering with Office actions 1: 434:22:43, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 406:01:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 384:01:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 370:22:09, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 338:04:14, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 324:01:49, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 303:01:48, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 257:01:52, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 241:01:42, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 221:01:37, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 195:01:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 178:01:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 162:01:33, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 136:01:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 114:01:24, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 92:01:20, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 70:01:06, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 54:01:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 449: 37: 18:User talk:Sghfdhdfghdfgfd 42:lists.wikimedia.org 238: 183:(edit conflict x2) 133: 230: 184: 125: 16:(Redirected from 440: 404: 402: 393: 368: 366: 357: 322: 320: 314: 300: 298: 290: 288: 239: 235: 219: 217: 208: 182: 160: 158: 149: 134: 130: 43: 41: 40: 39: 21: 448: 447: 443: 442: 441: 439: 438: 437: 418: 396: 391: 389: 360: 355: 353: 318: 312: 309: 301: 294: 292: 286: 284: 281: 233: 229: 211: 206: 204: 152: 147: 145: 128: 124: 35: 33: 30: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 446: 444: 417: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 342: 341: 340: 291: 280: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 266: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 237: 187:Reaper Eternal 166: 165: 164: 132: 106:Reaper Eternal 87: 84: 73: 72: 29: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 445: 436: 435: 431: 427: 423: 415: 407: 403: 401: 400: 394: 387: 386: 385: 381: 377: 373: 372: 371: 367: 365: 364: 358: 351: 347: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 326: 325: 321: 316: 315: 307: 306: 305: 304: 299: 297: 289: 287:Sven Manguard 279:Moral Support 278: 258: 254: 250: 246: 245: 244: 243: 242: 236: 231: 224: 223: 222: 218: 216: 215: 209: 202: 198: 197: 196: 192: 188: 181: 180: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 157: 156: 150: 143: 139: 138: 137: 131: 126: 121: 117: 116: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 95: 94: 93: 90: 89: 88: 85: 82: 77: 76: 75: 74: 71: 67: 63: 58: 57: 56: 55: 51: 47: 27: 19: 419: 398: 397: 362: 361: 311: 295: 282: 213: 212: 154: 153: 97: 81: 80: 31: 350:User:Picopa 102:User:Picopa 376:KnightLago 422:this edit 399:--Talk-- 392:Guoguo12 363:--Talk-- 356:Guoguo12 313:JoeGazz 214:--Talk-- 207:Guoguo12 155:--Talk-- 148:Guoguo12 34:arbcom-l 426:Kaldari 346:adopted 234:AndrewN 129:AndrewN 28:Blocked 330:Risker 249:Risker 170:Risker 144:here. 120:Risker 62:Risker 46:Risker 142:civil 430:talk 380:talk 334:talk 296:Talk 253:talk 199:Try 191:talk 174:talk 110:talk 86:fold 83:Hers 66:talk 50:talk 44:. 432:) 424:. 382:) 336:) 319:▲ 255:) 203:. 193:) 176:) 112:) 68:) 52:) 428:( 378:( 332:( 251:( 189:( 172:( 108:( 64:( 48:( 20:)

Index

User talk:Sghfdhdfghdfgfd
Risker
talk
01:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Risker
talk
01:06, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Hersfold
01:20, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
User:Picopa
Reaper Eternal
talk
01:24, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Risker
AndrewN
01:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
civil
Guoguo12
--Talk-- 
01:33, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Risker
talk
01:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Reaper Eternal
talk
01:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Knowledge (XXG):Child protection
Guoguo12
--Talk-- 
01:37, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.