User talk:Skybunny - Knowledge (XXG)

343:

generation that whatever they felt on 9/11/01 is kind of like how it felt on 11/22/63. (In some ways 9/11 was worse, because we had to sit through the footage ad nauseum. The film footage of JFK's shooting was not made public for 10 years.) I think part of our generation's obsessiveness with it has to do with "therapy"... if they can just somehow find the truth, they can feel vindicated. But as you said, there's no getting around the fact that he was killed. However, there is no limit to conspiracist looniness. Someone, years ago, actually posed the theory that JFK was still alive but in some sort of vegetative state. I think the relatively recent release of the autopsy photos pretty well put that theory to rest. Anyway, thanks for your note and your contributions. :)

377:? I almost asked you to help with it, originally, but I looked at the histories and thought s/he had given up making stubborn edits to the 9/11 pages( that was May 21st, his/her recent edit to the Aftermath page didn’t come until the 23rd), so I commented out the stuff I had about those pages, and left you alone. If this goes to Mediation or Arbitration( as I suspect it will, given SNIyer12’s tendency to ignore users who take issue with him/her), you should definitely be involved, if you want. -- 1715: 3010: 3572: 3424: 3336: 3203: 3066: 2911: 2839: 2680: 2581: 2505: 1963: 1900: 1650: 3027:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2298: 1230:

By the way, the checkuser was closed as unnecessary because I had an IP check in that resulted in more range blocks. On a side note, I noticed your comments at the RFCU about someone letting the individual know in no uncertain terms that he is banned... I've done that on 3 separate occasions now. He

410:

I edited your article for the facts, not what press clippings you appeared to use. I was a senior executive at the company and therefore know what happened and am aware what was reported to have happened. Your article had significant errors in almost every paragraph, starting with the first sentence.

2983:

since I last did), it also says, "...should be used if and only if its omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternative is available." I've changed the GP article to summarize the essence of what he said, using other quotes from both

734:

Skybunny, I saw your plea for "NPOV writing and avoiding alternate theory evidence flooding" in the TWA 800 article. That request went unheeded. Besides those problems, the article has few, if any, references, poorly structured and written, and many factual inaccuracies. It is an embarrassment. I've

442:

says that they expected not to pay back all the money they promised. On top of this, the company did donate a lot of their product before liquidating. Personally I think the truth is that not all the stockholders ended up getting paid the amount they should have, whether out of necessity or to avoid

411:

The company did not file for bankruptcy. It closed its doors with a net positive worth to give money back to shareholders. I am assuming that you just picked up articles that had invalid facts in them and your article did not include intentional misrepresentations of the facts. ---Betty and Lou

342:

Thanks for your note. You're right, too much time has passed for us to ever likely know the full story for sure, barring the appearance of some sensational, as-yet-undiscovered evidence. You don't say how old you are. I was a young teen in 1963, and it was an unbelievable shock. I tell the younger

1328:

As for Favre, I think only the top stats for Favre should be shown on his page. His numbers are so great that they threaten to overwhelm the entire article, and wikipedia is not just for stats and lists. I'd suppor cutting it down to the top 6-8 stats, whatever seems right, and just dropping the

924:

The editor has a history of making repeated demands and personal attacks regarding editing of this article, as can be reviewed at the links above regarding the community ban. The user has a distinctive methodology and tends to ask for or do the same edits over and over again, often peppered with

739:

article, and have alot of ideas about structure that can be carried over to the TWA 800 article. Also, I think that the alternative conspiracy theories can (and should) be discussed and presented in a respectful and NPOV manner. I'd like to start working on that article next week, but might come

477:

Skybunny - I'm not entirely sure where the image came from as I've had it on my computer and simply decided to upload it when I noticed that that Brett's article didn't have an image. I still am pretty sure that it is in fair use, but I'll try to find another one I can determine the source for,

2692:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

358:

They are fair use for pictures. A lot of the sports articles have them as pictures for the person being represented. So, therefore it is fair use. How is what I'm doing different than what anyone else is doing? I am just using them as pictures for the person. The same as everybody else.

2851:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

233:

I was able to find the logos I was looking for for WGBA on my tapes and uploaded them to the article, but I don't have anything for the WXGZ days; Sheboygan hasn't had WACY at all on cable so I have nothing on tape for the WACY era, though I do have the first Ace logo in JPG form.

323:

I'm curious to know what your take on the JFK assassination is, since I didn't see any of your edits offhand. I was intrigued by the various conspiracy theories at one time, but over the decades I have pretty well concluded that Oswald was definitely in on it and possibly the

1994:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 1931:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 443:

expenses. Would you mind exchanging contact information to talk more about this? More insight on the SEC documents and any concrete evidence you have would be super helpful. There are good and bad business lessons in this story, so I want to get it right. Thank you,

3596:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1382: 2593:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

2517:

1615: 1562: 1509: 912:

after disruption of the article Brett Favre, sockpuppeting, impersonation, and so forth. After several months (while still occasionally creating sockpuppets to hit the Brett Favre article), the user attempted to come back with the moniker

3599:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has

1126:

I responded to the amazingly funny (it seriously made me chuckle aloud) 3RR case. Just thought you would like to know, and if you need any help or you need me to state an opinion (since he/she is now blaming me) just ask. Thanks.

296:

Even admins can't check to see if the two users are one and the same. Such power is given to very few and is used sparingly. Let's try to settle this through discussion and reverts. I left the spam template on the anon's talk page.

1010:

and think a checkuser and rangeblock and semi-protection is in order. It would help out immensely. Oh yeah, good job watching out for him, I have found a couple that I thought were his socks and marked them accordingly.

666:

I have new documentation that I posted in the discussion page for the article that will show we are all in error. The voice of WWV is Lee Rodgers. Note it is dated 2005, the documentation from the tv station was 2003.

515:

for example. It uses some panels from comic strips to illustrate the subject of the article so that the reader can better understand it. Sorry if I'm a little ignorant here, and please correct me if I'm wrong :-). -

3469: 3379: 3246: 3109: 2879: 2753:, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the 2720: 2621: 2545: 2268:

for WikiProject Biography, as the article is rated B-class, and that is the highest class that can be assigned through a WikiProject's assessment process. If you'd like feedback on the article, you can request a

2041:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1063:

Thanks I figured it was him, but wasn't 100%, thanks for the quick response!! I will continue to watch the page for the rest for the season, and I hope we can keep the semi-pro on for the rest of the season.

932:

Reverted on the basis that the user is community banned, regardless of merit of the edit itself (which is to say that even if an edit by them is valid, it should still be removed on the grounds of the editor

2974:

differently than it is. I didn't put Horner's quote in lightly, and my justification at the time for doing it was 'Any citable source I find about his reaction used it as the cornerstone of his reaction'.

1787:. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an 462:

If this image is being questioned, you need to look at the other Minnesota Twins player images used on other articles. Just don't want to feel I'm being singled out, which I believe is the case right now.

1990:

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1927:

3453:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3363:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3230:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3093:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2863:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2704:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2605:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2529:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1147:

If you get any more password requests, send me the IPs via email (which will require you to enter an email account here... suggest setting up a gmail just for Knowledge (XXG)). I'll deal with it.--

171: 937:

In other words, the assumption as I understand it is that this editor has no standing on Knowledge (XXG) whatsoever unless they are released from the community ban by the arbitration committee.

3438: 3349: 3216: 3079: 2922: 2342: 1157:

No problem... those requests are quite possibly the stupidest thing he could possibly do. It shows you his IP, which you can tell to me, and I can rangeblock for a very, very long time.--

712:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any 605:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any 204:

According to my note on the talk page from a few days ago, it appears that low-res cover images can indeed be used under fair use. Click on the image and read the copyright tage there. --

92:

I noticed your draft for a television station article. I am a member of Wikiproject Television Stations, and I've been using a nifty table for each affiliate I've worked on. Take a look:

1747:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2463: 3525:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Knowledge (XXG) by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

918: 1743:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

708:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

601:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

511:

I understand that freely licenced images are ideal, but aren't there some situations where using a fair use image from a site such as ESPN.com would be appropriate? See the FA

909: 790:

By the way, I meant to thank you for your continued patience with Barry... He's learning and it's good that he isn't getting bitten while this process is happening. Thanks!--

2338: 1626:

during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

1573:

during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

1520:

during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

951:

I blocked the latest Starwars1955 socks. I'm not around much right now so I'd suggest opening a request for checkuser to see if there are any sleeper accounts (listing

132:, I've started a list of affiliates served by the chart. I added WGBA to there already, but when you're done, can you add the rest to that list? I've alphabetized them. 3592: 1736:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

332:

at the time, just because of his flippant demeanor about the whole subject. But as with the Lincoln conspiracy, we will probably never know the facts for certain.

143:

I even took your lead and added the FOX, UPN, and WB affiliates to my Mobile boxes. Haven't done it to Jacksonville yet, but I will tomorrow. Have a nice evening!

2314: 1732:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 697:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 594:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2948:

at 2019 Italian GP. While it might make interesting reading to you, other users/children are offended by this type of language. I know its from a quotation by

2265: 1984: 1921: 1798: 1788: 2322: 3581: 3168: 2806: 2401: 2230: 2185: 2140: 2095: 129: 2333: 434:

Hello Skybunny, I am researching Pets.com and would like to know more about what happened. I looked through the SEC documents, and according to page 9 of

1811: 1680: 1662: 701:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see

586:. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Knowledge (XXG) and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 374: 983:, but SW1955 likes to age his socks so it isn't the most effective way to deal with him (but it would filter out all the other crap happening there).-- 214:

i'm no expert in the fair use claim of these cover images - I only saw that example and presumed its justification was valid. Now that I've dug up the

3039: 1995: 1932: 1818: 1752: 717: 610: 29: 2652: 1817:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our

2003: 1940: 1822: 3289:

But I will assume you know what you are doing and that the current status of the article reflects what is most useful in covering the topic.

3164: 2802: 2397: 2226: 2181: 2136: 2091: 3019: 2918: 2792: 2274: 3492: 3402: 3268: 3131: 2893: 2734: 2635: 2066: 1674: 1607: 1554: 1501: 1999: 1936: 438:, only $ 102,951 was paid to Series A stockholders. Additionally, page 8 says that common stockholders may not get their money back, and 1322: 892: 842: 275: 2780: 1858: 1783:. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by 976: 1623: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1589: 1570: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1536: 1517: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1483: 993:

Good job trying to keep up with all of Starwars1955's socks. He gets on a tear on Sunday nights, it seems. Great job, hang in there.

979:) as well as requesting the checkusers look into a rangeblock if SW1955 is using his usual 4.245.XXX.XXX IP range... you could also 3315: 2655:

I suggest adding a new field: "former residence" for any person who is currently incarerated/was incarcerated before his/her death:

1666:

is looking for participants who are interested in improving the quality of the articles on America's favorite small-town team, the

1039:

and a fairly complete understanding of Wiki formatting, I didnt go so far as placing a tag on the User page. What do you think?

1979:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) is acceptable. Please go to

1916:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) is acceptable. Please go to

1454: 3488: 3398: 3264: 3127: 2889: 2730: 2631: 2062: 3536: 3462: 3372: 3239: 3102: 2984:

articles, then finished with 'and summed it up with an expletive', which people are free to go look at if they really want to.

2914: 2872: 2713: 2614: 2538: 34: 24: 17: 2656: 2462: 2394:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2223:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2178:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2133:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2088:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1991: 1928: 1744: 709: 602: 3295:

is where I got the idea for what to call the article, but I will assume the topic is adequately covered with the new title.

3023:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2788: 689:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3518: 3028: 1784: 1737: 3510: 962: 439: 3585: 2653:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biography#A_person_incarcerated_for_over_a_year:_What_should_be_put_down_as_the_residence.3F

2053:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1611: 1558: 1505: 1349:

is SW55. 70.17.232.198 however is probably not; it's on the completely opposite coast from where SW55 operates from.--

39: 3474: 3384: 3251: 3114: 2884: 2725: 2626: 2550: 2058: 1248:

It seems there's new sockpuppets of Starwars1955, same writing style, same syntax problems, exact same edits. He's at

1724:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1277:. He has used multiple accounts to make back-to-back edits on other pages to give the illusion of productive change. 435: 2757:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 2386:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2215:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2170:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2125:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2080:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1686: 914: 736: 582: 2436: 771:

article would be most welcomed. I'd like to see that article improved and expanded beyond stub status. Cheers! --

648:

Asked for speedy delete of this image; someone has found a free image of the subject (so fair use isn't needed).

448: 215: 175: 3299: 1814:; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale. 1635: 1582: 1529: 50: 2216: 1885: 1877: 1779: 1760: 1446: 1253: 3450: 3360: 3227: 3090: 2860: 2701: 2602: 2526: 2270: 1720: 1273:

This editor admits to using three different accounts/IP addresses, and has no other legit edits other than to

58: 1614:). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1561:). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1508:). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 542:

Thanks for the clarification. I will try to locate a freely licenced image if I can, and I'll certainly give

3286:

Was the move discussed? I feel like as a major contributor to the article I should have at least been told.

2432: 1631: 1606:

satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "

1578: 1553:

satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "

1525: 1500:

satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "

1318: 1205: 888: 838: 3158: 2796: 880: 830: 2372: 1032: 970: 444: 2054: 1980: 1971: 1917: 1908: 1846:

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Knowledge (XXG) over to

621: 3309: 2663: 1442: 1314: 1257: 1249: 304: 285: 262: 76: 1627: 1574: 1521: 702: 685: 3149:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2960: 2784: 2779:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2754: 2081: 2011: 1948: 382: 144: 133: 117: 3432: 3343: 3210: 3073: 2847: 2688: 2589: 2571: 2513: 2495: 2030: 2021: 1881: 1873: 1756: 751: 741: 3446: 3356: 3292: 3223: 3086: 2856: 2697: 2598: 2522: 2050: 2034: 1729: 191: 3607: 2657:

Template_talk:Infobox_criminal#New_field.2C_.22former_residence.22_.28for_incarcerated_persons.29

2282: 2171: 1791:

linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

1698: 1649: 1468: 1426: 1402: 1346: 1210: 1180: 1168: 1129: 1085: 1066: 1041: 1013: 884: 834: 800: 670: 636: 274:

I have also noticed that that anon is spamming Life Alert on to other pages. We should both keep

219: 205: 187: 548: 518: 486: 1865: 1847: 3548: 3184: 2822: 2766: 2559: 2417: 2368: 2302: 2246: 2201: 2156: 2111: 1668: 1421: 1358:

By the way, I know how he is back editing and I'm exploring an option for dealing with this.--

1201: 966: 925:

personal attacks, and it is my understanding that edits by them or any sockpuppets are to be:

905: 855: 812: 776: 512: 72: 3458: 3368: 3235: 3098: 2868: 2709: 2610: 2534: 2046: 2038: 1976: 1913: 1733: 980: 698: 595: 543: 46: 3481: 3391: 3303: 3258: 3121: 2949: 2930: 2659: 2387: 2327: 2126: 1864:

template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location:

1830: 1714: 956: 360: 298: 279: 256: 54: 3461:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3454: 3371:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3364: 3238:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3231: 3101:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3094: 2871:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2864: 2712:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2705: 2613:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2606: 2537:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2530: 2309:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

2049:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2042: 1869: 1619: 1566: 1513: 1100: 167: 3047: 2956: 2007: 2002:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the

1944: 1939:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the

1472: 1458: 1330: 1278: 1261: 1114: 1104: 994: 554: 524: 492: 397: 378: 3024: 2971: 1725: 690: 587: 3161:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 2799:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 1400:

page looks awesome!! You made it look professional and sooo much cleaner. Good job!!!

3577: 3562: 3154: 3150: 2360: 1840: 1825:. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. 1359: 1350: 1302: 1289: 1232: 1222: 1158: 1148: 1007: 984: 791: 344: 333: 235: 20:

to Knowledge (XXG). Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;

1868:. The original version of the image uploaded to Knowledge (XXG) has been tagged with 1854:

media. The image was either individually tagged or was in a category tagged with the

827:

What's this girls deal, revert it back the way you want, I don't care, I'm moving on

694: 591: 3603: 3175:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2990: 2813:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2482: 2444: 2408:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2278: 2261: 2237:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2220: 2192:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2147:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2102:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1616:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Chip 'n Dale Rescue Rangers episodes (Season 3)

1563:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Chip 'n Dale Rescue Rangers episodes (Season 2)

1510:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Chip 'n Dale Rescue Rangers episodes (Season 1)

938: 649: 628: 616: 420: 416: 84: 1301:

I blocked the accounts per the duck test. Looks like an old friend got a new ISP.--

3543: 3514: 3180: 3176: 2818: 2814: 2758: 2555: 2413: 2409: 2242: 2238: 2197: 2193: 2152: 2148: 2107: 2103: 1851: 1381: 772: 464: 163: 154: 3423: 3335: 3202: 3065: 2838: 2679: 2580: 2504: 1113:

Glad to help. Now there's a flood of sockpuppets coming after me, too. Take care!

170:. As you commented on the Deep Throat talk page, I'd appreciate your comments at 83:

Odd...I don't see a comment there? Maybe it needs to be re-submitted to the page.

1178:

Does he have an email I can send it to, or should I just do it on his talk page.

2926: 2750: 1826: 1450: 1397: 1274: 1096: 1036: 952: 807: 64: 3043: 3005:

Orphaned non-free image File:Bhopal gas disaster girl by pablo bartholomew.jpg

2359:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

810:, what this guy's deal? He's making edits and comments that don't make sense.► 721: 252: 245: 1099:, fair warning. You've been nominated (in a fairly hilarious discussion) for 2175: 2130: 2085: 190:

redirect to match your section heading. Cool? Pleasure working with you.

1602:. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that 1549:. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that 1496:. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that 2478: 2440: 3465:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3375:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3242:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3105:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2875:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2716:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2617:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2541:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1804:

That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

1166:

I also got this email and have the IP address, who should I send it to?

251:

I hate it when shady IPs set up advertisement-articles. I tried to help

3442:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3353:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3220:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3083:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2037:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

3611: 3555: 3496: 3406: 3321: 3272: 3188: 3135: 3051: 2998: 2970:

Hey there. Your criticism is well taken. So it turns out I remembered

2964: 2934: 2897: 2826: 2769: 2738: 2667: 2639: 2563: 2486: 2448: 2421: 2376: 2286: 2250: 2205: 2160: 2115: 2070: 2015: 1952: 1889: 1834: 1764: 1703: 1475: 1461: 1431: 1407: 1362: 1353: 1333: 1305: 1292: 1281: 1264: 1235: 1225: 1215: 1185: 1173: 1161: 1151: 1134: 1117: 1107: 1090: 1071: 1046: 1018: 997: 987: 941: 864: 821: 794: 780: 754: 744: 724: 673: 652: 642: 567: 537: 505: 467: 452: 423: 400: 386: 363: 347: 336: 310: 291: 268: 238: 222: 208: 194: 1975:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under 1912:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under 1801:

on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.

908:, or one of the several dozen sockpuppets they've created. They were 2905:

Nomination for deletion of Template:US TV schedule Saturday morning

218:

regarding thse images, perhaps your assessment is more accurate. --

255:, but I know so little about it. Thanks for chopping it up a bit. 1231:

understands the situation, he just chooses to ignore that fact.--

172:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/W. Mark Felt/archive1

3478:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3388:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3255:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3118:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1810:

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an

929:

Removed from an article (invariably Brett Favre) without comment

768: 761: 125: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 93: 3468:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

3436:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

3378:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

3245:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

3108:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

2979:, reading the policy more closely (and I'll be fair, it's been 2878:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

2719:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

2620:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

2544:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

1083:

Thanks for the update. Ill keep on watching, keep me posted!

3347:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

3214:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

2391: 2273:. If you believe the article is ready to be upgraded, you can 1622:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

1569:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

1516:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

392:

September 11, 2001 attacks timeline for the day of the attacks

3008: 1961: 1898: 1031:

I think I may have found a new sockpuppet for Starwars1955,

767:

Hey, any more input help or additions you could give at the

1467:

Fair warning, you've had a sock named after you. Check out

740:

crying to you for help (if you would be willing to do so).

663:

Hello and thank you for your help with Radio Station WWV.

3580:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

1773:

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BobBrownKaituma.jpg}

479: 116:. Tell me what you think about using it in your articles. 2923:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

2477:

Many thanks for your work with the WikiProject Wisconsin-

904:

The things I miss when I'm away for a few hours. This is

3077:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

1260:. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! 1095:

There's a new batch of sockpuppets making the rounds at

576:

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Pets-com-sock-puppet.jpg)

186:

I made two minor tweaks to your paragraph and fixed the

3576:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3449: