490:
and should be ashamed of yourselves. Why on Earth would anyone want to participate in this Soap opera? I recommend you go ahead and block this account indefinately and I also think you should do a SPI. Definately need to do an SPI, might be a whole bunch more users "posing" as
Kumioko. Hundreds or thousands of them I'll bet. I'm sure while he was racking up that massive edit count and doing all that work around the project he was actually posing as multiple users. Maybe even you, how do we know your not Kumioko? Maybe I'm really Jimbo posing to see how you would react, Maybe Jimbo is Kumioko and has been posing as an editor all along.
630:
investigation. If you think I am
Kumioko I want to see something more tangible than a malformed edit history that was reverted as Vandalism, reverted by an IP and then reverted again by FRAM. Certainly you can provide some better evidence to support your conclusion than that! And this lousy Wiki software doesn't even allow an editor to make a comment. Completely stupid. Someone should fix the software so the accused can at least comment on their behalf in a discussion like this.
395:
continue contributing great, I will be happy too, if not then I can sit and watch a football game, play Xbox or any number of other things. Think what you want but I'm not that editor and I suspect if you could actually prove it you would have blocked me already. I'm really not mad about this, I'm just somewhat surprised and disappointed that we are wasting so much hard drive space in discussions like this instead of editing and building an encyclopedia.
323:
118:
429:
noticed dashboat had a problem with some pages and I was about to drop that bots operator a message and let him know. You can mark me down on the inactive editors list. BTW, I think the system is poorly designed that you can open a discussion at ANI and then block the user(s) from being able to comment there. Thats like taking someone to court and then telling them that they are not allowed to speak or present any evidence on their behalf.
544:
409:
Kumioko, all I asked you to do was to clean-start responsibly, i.e. by not wasting other editors' time with "newbie" questions. Since you're not willing to agree to that, and since you're simultaneously continuing on to fight as
Kumioko under the 71.* IP address, I've blocked you for a week. Please,
723:
the kind of people who find it easy are the kind of people who cause all kinds of trouble. As it stands, you're not banned, you're just blocked for a week. If you want to go, then that's a shame, but it's your call. If you want to stay, then please stop playing games, wait a week, and don't keep
489:
Certainly no need now, it looks like everyone already passed judgement. I can see why
Kumioko got so pissed off. All those years of work and loyalty to the project and now all it takes is one editor to say that I am associated to them and the lynch mob gathers fer da hangin'. You all are ridiculous
364:
Noted. So is it normally acceptable to accuse a new editor of being someone they are not? Frankly, if this is normally how new users are treated I am surprised that
Knowledge has lasted as long as it has. If you feel I have done something wrong or if you think I am Kumioko socking then feel free to
474:
No worries you all go on and have your chat. Like I said I don't really care because your not hurting me. Just a suggestion, you might also want to block Kumi-taskbot. It also might interest you to know that IP 138 is a proxy for about half the US navy so blocking it prevents about 200, 000 people
428:
No problem. Totally fine since I am not that user but I see how things are handled now here so its all good. Kumioko already stated they were the 71 IP and I stated I used teh 138. If you want to block me though the message is clear to me and understood. I won't be editing anymore. Just for FYI, I
379:
Well, you and I both know what's going on, let's not be silly. If I'd wanted to toss out a socking block I'd have done so. But personally I'd rather let productive editors edit. All I'm asking is that you not waste other editors' time by asking them questions you already know the answer to. Fair
258:
Yes, it can get ugly around here. Keep you head down for the first few months is a good idea as it will help you get the lay of the land. It also helps to stay away from controversial subjects. For the most part, it is a good place with alot of helpful and great people. If you need any help,
394:
What is it with this place? I'm sure your used to editors who want to stay, beg for their accounts to be left alone. I'm not that vested! I've only been here for a couple weeks. I am perfectly happy to let this go and continue editing but I'm not going to fight for it. If
Knowledge wants me to
629:
I wasn't going to contest this but its so absurd that I find that I simply can't allow this farse to continue. For that many editors to turn on so quickly with nothing but a notion that they are a sock of a long time editor, one of their own. Its utterly discraceful. I also request an SPI
183:
Thank you Rosie but I think I'm just gonna keep to myself for a while. I've been reading some pretty outrageous discussions on the various project pages and I think I need to just keep my head down and stay out of the line of fire. Every ware I go it seems like fire and brimstone.
202:
No worries, Joe. (Hope it's ok to call you that.) Just know I'm available for you if you have a question; and ditto for the
Teahouse hosts. For as many fire and brimstone folks, there are twice as many nice ones. I hope you get a sense of who they are, too. Cheers,
475:
from editing. One final note, I think you need to ask a checkuser to validate my user name. It might be interesting to see if that comes back as a match and that might give your case some credibility rather than just heresay and speculation!
718:
is going to be hard to argue away. That mistake is a good thing, actually, as it demonstrates that you find being sneaky rather difficult; there are many people who can fake it better than you, and as a rule they're all unwelcome
231:
Yup! I'm just here to say hi and second
Rosiestep's comment - the Teahouse is a safe place to share inquiries, concerns and questions. We're here to help...and give you a nice cup of warm Wiki-tea! See you there sometime, I hope.
752:
meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on
Knowledge. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse
348:
I've got no problem with editors doing a clean start with a new account, but it does seem a little mean to take up the time of helpful editors like
Acdixon by pretending to be someone who doesn't know how to do things.
724:
picking at scabs. I've considered this carefully ("power-hungry admin censors helpless editor"), but I think it best for all involved to lock this talk page for the duration of the block, and I've done so. --
217:
Thank you I'll keep that in mind. I am sure I will have plenty of questions as I go along depending on how long it takes to run into one of the less than friendly editors I have been reading about.
584:
686:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
336:
131:
291:
773:
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
579:
31:
176:
671:
598:
702:
52:
754:
57:
694:
Checkusers do not do "prove my innocence" checks. They're notoriously easy to manipulate if you know one is coming. —
556:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
758:
557:
67:
695:
551:
61:
411:
631:
562:
491:
476:
430:
396:
366:
218:
185:
98:
237:
38:
27:
789:
729:
657:
82:
74:
78:
208:
165:
90:
275:
260:
745:
175:
160:. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Knowledge. Please join us!
157:
43:
34:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
89:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
509:
465:
451:
419:
385:
354:
329:
322:
279:
264:
233:
124:
117:
766:
749:
725:
680:
653:
302:
460:
If you like I will unblock you for the sole purpose of commenting in the AN/I discussion.
299:
The feedback feature is still experimental, so there's going to be some flaws. Sorry.
204:
161:
779:
505:
461:
447:
415:
381:
350:
138:
48:
783:
733:
707:
661:
639:
513:
504:
As far as I know, neither Jimbo nor I have signed a post as "formerly Kumioko".
499:
484:
469:
455:
438:
423:
404:
389:
374:
358:
309:
283:
268:
241:
226:
212:
193:
169:
141:
106:
93:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place
156:, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the
86:
744:
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at
542:
339:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
321:
134:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
116:
668:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
688:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
715:
612:
608:
602:
593:
589:
575:
571:
567:
444:
414:. I'm also going to post a thread to AN/I about this.
410:
please, please take this week to read and understand
550:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
443:I really wish you wouldn't insult my intelligence.
328:Hello, ShmuckatellieJoe. You have new messages at
259:don't hesitate to give me a buzz on my talk page.
123:Hello, ShmuckatellieJoe. You have new messages at
748:would like your feedback! We have created a brief
8:
274:I just did a lengthy reply on my talk page.
740:Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
73:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
365:ban me and prevent me from contributing.
97:before the question. Again, welcome! .
7:
714:Kumioko, please, please stop this.
14:
412:the policies on multiple accounts
174:
58:How to create your first article
769:to be taken to the survey site.
1:
142:19:06, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
107:17:38, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
39:The five pillars of Knowledge
26:Hello, ShmuckatellieJoe, and
30:to Knowledge! Thank you for
554:, who declined the request.
806:
784:16:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
734:21:28, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
708:21:23, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
662:21:28, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
640:20:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
514:20:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
500:20:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
485:19:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
470:19:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
456:19:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
439:19:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
424:19:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
405:17:53, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
390:16:32, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
375:16:19, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
359:16:06, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
672:guide to appealing blocks
310:20:49, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
284:00:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
269:06:27, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
242:21:09, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
227:14:05, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
213:02:34, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
194:06:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
170:04:42, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
635:
495:
480:
434:
400:
370:
222:
189:
102:
790:Global message delivery
53:How to develop articles
547:
326:
121:
599:change block settings
546:
325:
120:
290:In response to your
330:Achowat's talk page
147:Teahouse invitation
125:Acdixon's talk page
91:Knowledge:Questions
788:Message sent with
746:Knowledge:Teahouse
548:
337:remove this notice
327:
132:remove this notice
122:
49:How to edit a page
32:your contributions
782:, Teahouse host,
81:your messages on
797:
776:Happy editing,
705:
700:
685:
679:
632:ShmuckatellieJoe
618:
616:
605:
587:
585:deleted contribs
563:ShmuckatellieJoe
545:
492:ShmuckatellieJoe
477:ShmuckatellieJoe
431:ShmuckatellieJoe
397:ShmuckatellieJoe
367:ShmuckatellieJoe
340:
307:
219:ShmuckatellieJoe
186:ShmuckatellieJoe
178:
154:ShmuckatellieJoe
135:
99:ShmuckatellieJoe
96:
805:
804:
800:
799:
798:
796:
795:
794:
742:
703:
696:
691:
683:
677:
676:, then use the
665:
643:
606:
596:
582:
565:
558:blocking policy
543:
540:
346:
341:
334:
319:
303:
295:
256:
180:
172:
149:
136:
129:
114:
94:
68:Manual of Style
19:
12:
11:
5:
803:
801:
741:
738:
737:
736:
711:
710:
666:
650:
646:Decline reason
627:
623:Request reason
620:
541:
539:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
345:
342:
333:
320:
318:
315:
294:
288:
287:
286:
255:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
197:
196:
151:
150:
148:
145:
128:
115:
113:
110:
71:
70:
65:
62:Article Wizard
55:
46:
41:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
802:
793:
791:
786:
785:
781:
777:
774:
771:
770:
768:
762:
760:
756:
751:
747:
739:
735:
731:
727:
722:
717:
713:
712:
709:
706:
701:
699:
693:
692:
690:
689:
682:
675:
673:
664:
663:
659:
655:
649:
647:
642:
641:
637:
633:
626:
624:
619:
614:
610:
604:
600:
595:
591:
586:
581:
577:
576:global blocks
573:
572:active blocks
569:
564:
559:
555:
553:
552:administrator
538:Contest block
537:
515:
511:
507:
503:
502:
501:
497:
493:
488:
487:
486:
482:
478:
473:
472:
471:
467:
463:
459:
458:
457:
453:
449:
446:
442:
441:
440:
436:
432:
427:
426:
425:
421:
417:
413:
408:
407:
406:
402:
398:
393:
392:
391:
387:
383:
378:
377:
376:
372:
368:
363:
362:
361:
360:
356:
352:
343:
338:
331:
324:
316:
314:
312:
311:
308:
306:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
253:
243:
239:
235:
230:
229:
228:
224:
220:
216:
215:
214:
210:
206:
201:
200:
199:
198:
195:
191:
187:
182:
181:
179:
177:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
146:
144:
143:
140:
133:
126:
119:
111:
109:
108:
104:
100:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
69:
66:
63:
59:
56:
54:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
37:
36:
35:
33:
29:
24:
23:
16:
787:
778:
775:
772:
764:
763:
743:
720:
697:
687:
669:
667:
651:
645:
644:
628:
622:
621:
594:creation log
561:
549:
347:
313:
304:
301:
298:
296:
257:
173:
153:
137:
72:
64:if you wish)
25:
21:
20:
726:Floquenbeam
654:Floquenbeam
652:See below.
305:Agent 78787
95:{{help me}}
85:using four
60:(using the
590:filter log
445:Seriously.
83:talk pages
75:Wikipedian
755:Questions
670:read the
609:checkuser
568:block log
344:Etiquette
205:Rosiestep
162:Rosiestep
77:! Please
761:page.
580:contribs
380:enough?
335:You can
292:feedback
158:Teahouse
130:You can
112:Talkback
44:Tutorial
22:Welcome!
721:because
681:unblock
603:unblock
506:28bytes
462:28bytes
448:28bytes
416:28bytes
382:28bytes
351:28bytes
276:Bgwhite
261:Bgwhite
152:Hello!
139:Acdixon
28:welcome
17:Welcome
765:Click
759:Guests
750:survey
698:Jeremy
87:tildes
704:v^_^v
674:first
234:Sarah
780:J-Mo
767:here
730:talk
716:This
658:talk
636:talk
510:talk
496:talk
481:talk
466:talk
452:talk
435:talk
420:talk
401:talk
386:talk
371:talk
355:talk
280:talk
265:talk
254:Help
238:talk
223:talk
209:talk
190:talk
166:talk
103:talk
79:sign
51:and
757:or
613:log
560:).
792:.
732:)
684:}}
678:{{
660:)
648::
638:)
625::
607:•
601:•
597:•
592:•
588:•
583:•
578:•
574:•
570:•
512:)
498:)
483:)
468:)
454:)
437:)
422:)
403:)
388:)
373:)
357:)
317:TB
282:)
267:)
240:)
225:)
211:)
203:--
192:)
168:)
105:)
728:(
656:(
634:(
617:)
615:)
611:(
566:(
508:(
494:(
479:(
464:(
450:(
433:(
418:(
399:(
384:(
369:(
353:(
332:.
278:(
263:(
236:(
221:(
207:(
188:(
164:(
127:.
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
