1868:, you give good advice. Meanwhile, I can answer that one. Yes, it's true. However, I've blocked you as an obvious sock (alternatively someone who impersonates an obvious sock). Indefinite is the only alternative there, and (to answer a question you haven't asked yet) a preliminary warning also isn't relevant. ("Hello, please stop being an obvious sock or you may be blocked.") And it's beyond me why you don't simply use the block appeal template that you've been told about. You can ask and state anything you like in your appeal, and ask for it to be pasted to WP:AN or WP:AE. (They'll both work, but I would recommend WP:AE.)
365:, which is similar to edits you have done elsewhere, please keep in mind the coherence of the article. Even unsourced material can be kept if it is non-contentious, and tagged for citations. For example, the factual information about the birth date, place, and the education details, are fairly non-contentious. I would say there is no serious harm in keeping it unless it is contradicted by some other sources. I will revert your deletion for now. You can take another shot at cleaning it up. -
1206:, makes me "involved", in the sense that it's inappropriate for me to block you. You're mistaken. I took a look at the page he linked to, but had to decide I didn't have time to do anything there. Even if I had responded to, or acted on, Sitush's request to try to smooth down the new editor, it wouldn't have made me involved. I have only ever involved myself with Indian topics in an administrative capacity; I don't edit the articles, nor discuss their content on talkpages. Take a look at
1891:
behind the accounts, iii) on-project exposure of all accounts and IP addresses used across
Knowledge and its sister projects iv) public exposure of any real world activities or personal information. The fact that you have done none of these in my case exposes you as a cheap liar who queerly resorted to ARBIPA to save your pal Sitush. I shall wait till some uninvolved administrator eventually gives me proper answers, before filing my Unblock Appeal thank you.
198:
1800:
1706:
161:
1389:
1197:
it: if you go to your preferences, you will find the e-mail options under the "User profile" tab. Then you should be able to e-mail me, if you have something confidential to say to me. Thank you for providing your addy above, but I don't much feel like using it — I don't have anything confidential to say to you, and to be absolutely frank I'm not crazy about giving you my address either.
2145:
804:
125:
685:“The encyclopedia that anyone can edit” is at risk of becoming, in computer scientist Aaron Halfaker’s words, “the encyclopedia that anyone who understands the norms, socializes him or herself, dodges the impersonal wall of semiautomated rejection and still wants to voluntarily contribute his or her time and energy can edit.”
752:
article confusion with
Dharampal (Gandhian), b) wrong statement he was fellow of INSA (turned out to be NASI fellow instead which is a relatively inferior grade of fellowship), c) very poor INDEPENDENT good quality sources (which BTW is still the case), and d) I doubt that Agrawal satisfies WP:GNG or WP:SCHOLAR
1027:
by Sitush. After he couldn't find a reliable source, he simply stuck on a template and left the allegations in place. Is the RBI inquiry report cited in public domain or does Sitush (like Ritu Sarin or Arun
Shourie) have a private copy ? Why is Sitush reluctant to cite 'Lifting the veil over Pratibha
876:
regarding
Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important
384:
Look, it is obvious to anyone with an ounce of sense that you are a returning contributor. Your claim that you have gained all your wikihistory and policy knowledge from completing The
Knowledge Adventure just does not wash, you are making a fair few very poor edits using inconsistent approaches, and
1337:
OK, I've told you my opinion of your "involved" claim, and that claim frankly seems like a mere attempt at diversion to me. If you really do have answers to things like the
Knowledge Adventure issue, why don't you offer any of these answers? Anyway, unless you should come up with something genuinely
1196:
E-mail problem? Probably the problem is that you don't yourself have e-mail enabled. You can't e-mail other users through the wikimail system without having it yourself; there's a reciprocity about it. Not sure whether you can enable wikimail while you're blocked, but I don't really see why not. Try
1084:
It appears I've become so used to placing block notices using
Twinkle that I forgot the arb enforcement template doesn't actually place the block. Fixed — now you're blocked. As for where Sitush complained about you, I believe most blocks, certainly most of mine, are placed without any complaint or
751:
Thanks for your comments /feedback. Somebody has to "clean up" unsourced statements in articles or else anybody can write anything. When I did try to rewrite some articles, this editor Sitush started attacking me. There was some initial confusion at the D.P.Agrawal article, because of a) Rajiv Dixit
1967:
To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have
1890:
Dear
Bishonen, Your new argument that I was blocked for being an obvious sock is bollocks. If I was an obvious sock (which I am not), you would have explicitly stated it in the blocklog and you would also have done all the following i) blocked all affected accounts, ii) banned the user (sockmaster)
1118:
I did exactly as he suggested by trying to improve his edits and thereafter continually attempted to strike with him. Since he is from US and I am from India, it seems there was some language communication gap. (I learn later that in his country "butt out" can also mean "simply go away" etc). But I
982:
I was never blocked. And I shall continue to edit. This entire episode reeks of bias against Indian editors to prevent them from editing responsibly on articles about India. BTW: Can you cite any policy which compelled me to reply to your wild accusations ? I have pointed answers for each and every
770:
As for the D.P.Agrawal article, I can accept that the sources are not great, but for academics that is essentially all you get. They don't get much press and the scholarly mentions are often cursory. But my view is that there are plenty of people buying and reading their books. We provide a service
1639:
Oh, I see. So what you mean is that because once, over four years ago, Sitush and I once attended the same
Knowledge Meetup, I am for ever disqualified from acting as an administrator in any case with any connection to Sitush. An interesting interpretation of "involved", but not, I think, a useful
1356:
The
Knowledge Adventure is another communication gap thing. I said I "took" the TWA whereas Sitush interprets it to mean I "completed" the TWA. I took the TWA as part of my Management degree program on strategic social marketing and new communication technologies. The TWA was done onscreen (using
883:
You edit largely by removing material, and you seem quite unwilling to do due diligence first, such as look for sources or — if that's not something you wish to do — simply tag as {{Unref}} instead of removing. Users have urged you repeatedly to follow these principles, but you apparently have no
1257:
you (why you ?) in a dispute the SPA was having with him and myself,and then followed it up with calls on his talk page (which he knows you watch) sending signals about me BLOCK .. BLOCK .. BLOCK. All these factors indicate you are a BIASED admin whom Sitush deliberately "involved". When Sitush
1143:
When I took a small India related editing dispute between us to WP:3O, he actually replied on his talk page that WP:30 was waste of time and I would be blocked before that. I don't know why he was so confident that you (or some other) would block me to prevent me from using Knowledge's dispute
409:
is a pattern of repeated offensive behavior that appears to a reasonable observer to intentionally target a specific person or persons. Usually (but not always) the purpose is to make the target feel threatened or intimidated, and the outcome may be to make editing Knowledge unpleasant for the
2128:
Hi, Sigmabaroda. You were quite right in January that arbitration enforcement blocks aren't supposed to be indefinite. I don't know why I was so stubborn about it, I apologise. I have now converted your AE block to an ordinary indefinite block, which you can appeal in the ordinary way per the
721:
shows an awful lot of negative numbers. That indicates that you are spending a lot of time cleaning articles and deleting content, rather than writing new content. You need to balance both. Ideally you should pick subjects that you are genuinely interested in and work towards improving those
1215:
IMO I have now answered all your remotely reasonable questions/arguments. I decline to debate the definition of "butt out" and similar matters with you (beyond noting that you misread the dictionary, perhaps accidentally). I suggest you move on to the next step in your appeal process.
266:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
1741:
Also is it true that the appellant has to grovel a lot in his appeal and agree to stay away from India related articles broadly construed for ARBIPA appeal to succeed ? Can you point me to similar ARBIPA appeals on AENB for indefinite blocks which have succeeded ?
1100:
Since I intend to appeal your sanction, could you respond to my comment that you are not an uninvolved editor in this case (to apply this sanction) because U:Sitush had earlier specially invited you into an ongoing dispute he and I were having with a WP:SPA on
729:
article that you did was unwarranted, because the man is important enough to have a page but not that important that we should go and clean his page on a high priority. However, your deletion forced me to do just that, which I didn't particularly
920:"I will level / bulldoze some (a few) important articles on India which are poorly sourced or badly POV - and which I find especially offensive/unencyclopediac, and you can erect / correct / content create or whatever it is you do after that."
1484:
Hi, Thanks for this valuable pointer to "leading questions". So it means that Sitush could not ask me leading questions like - have you stopped being a WP:SOCK ? I have also started rephrasing the questions.I am not hostile, I am upset.
713:
Sigmabaroda, I don't exactly know what the problem is, and I don't think I want to know either because I am up to my neck with other stuff. However, I would like to say a couple of things which might help you build better relationships:
2161:
from editing for persistent disruptive editing. It further seems obvious from your evasions and misdirections on this page that you are a sock of a banned user. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may
1164:. Good job. At this point, you're a half-baked version of what FPAS is, if you want to be proud of it, that's your choice. Also, some curt language, you got there, buddy. Please have the decency to be polite and get rid of that attitude
1338:
new, I'm done on this page. If you have any faith in your cause, you should appeal your block. Don't you think there would be a certain logic in telling other, neutral, people, rather than me myself, all about my "admin abuse"?
1085:
block request; admins simply use their eyes. In this case, there was no complaint: I watch Sitush's page, and what I saw there made me take a look at your page, and your editing. Sorry for the confusion about the block.
1174:
Considering all these things I hope you immediately unblock me, or else you will also indefinitely block Sitush also under the same ARBCOM ARBIPA decision for disruptive editing relating to India related articles.
136:
but your explanations didn't appear to accurately describe the actual content and sources. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the
1069:. I request either Sitush or Bishonen to point where Sitush complained about me and I came to be blocked by Bishonen without prior discussions. Those emails may also be given to me for my future appeal process.
766:
Sitush is a solid experienced editor, and I suggest you listen to him more. I am not saying you shouldn't delete material, but rather that you need to find a balance between cleaning up and creating your own
1532:. Continue in the same way and expect to have talk page access removed, to stop you from endlessly wasting time of other editors with your string of unconstructive messages disguised as requests for help.
1420:
To what extent is the social policy WP:AGF a binding principle for editors. Under what circumstance, if any, can WP:AGF be ignored by non-administrators under the essay WP:PACT ? The context is statement
1423:
Look, India- and Pakistan-related stuff is absolutely plagued with sockpuppets and meatfarms. While we are supposed to assume good faith, it is not a suicide pact.- Sitush (talk) 06:11, 10 January 2016
1445:
The other editor says he was receiving emails from other editors complaining about me. I think he is making up about these emails, so how to apply for discovery of these emails for drafting my appeal ?
2090:
1063:. I am finding that the blocking ARBCOM "Bishonen" is not an "uninvolved administrator" because "Sitush" had involved him directly into another dispute involving Sitush, myself and 3rd editor, see
918:, I believe you pretty much admit to following Sitush's editing in order to make editing unpleasant for him — else why suggest a "pact" whereby you offer to leave him alone on certain conditions?
457:
that you had completed The Knowledge Adventure. I am pretty sure that if you did then it would show up in your contribution history because of the interactive edits that go on during that process.
453:
No, obviously. Although the senders may choose to reveal themselves here if they are watching this page. I'll give you another example of what on the face of it appears to be anomalous: you said
1968:
taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see
1395:
217:
900:
and I don't see why we should have patience with that either. You won't even say yes or no to Sitush's direct question above ("Can you at least confirm that you are not in breach of
1619:" Meetup Manchester -- developing a core of Wikipedians who now know each other better", -- "and also great to finally meet JamesBWatson and Sitush (and, of course, all the others)
684:
1571:
I asked for an UNINVOLVED administrator's help. I believe you should have stayed away from this matter since you are known to associate with User:Sitush outside of Knowledge.
1154:
My editing was not at all disruptive because another editor even strongly objected against Sitush's hostile attitude and incivility towards me at Administrator's noticeboard
310:
Stalking is called "Wikihounding" nowadays. Take it to the article talkpage and stop using abusive language like "butt out" and "can't be arsed" etc. Some of us get offended.
810:
233:
2111:
of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification.
1956:. According to the procedures, a "clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action.
1005:
and her family members was of a pathetic standard ? Knowledge is clearly a joke of an encyclopedia when it comes to India, when even the article on a former
1855:
Again, you are asking leading questions. I would highly suggest you wait for an uninvolved admin to come around. The average helper can't help you here. --
893:
Moreover, it seems clear to me that you are a returning contributor with something to hide. The only alternative that makes any sense would be that you're
908:. You have stated elsewhere that you have acquired your striking familiarity with Knowledge jargon and culture partly by "taking" the Knowledge Adventure.
1953:
873:
1471:. You come off as hostile, and it will discourage other, uninvolved editors from help you. I highly suggest that you rephrase your questions. Thanks. --
1436:
I understood that the term "returning contributor" to essentially mean a user who is logging in again to edit using his registered account and password
771:
to them. Agrawal is certainly a notable scholar and widely respected. My main interest in him is that he is a `nationalist' historian who believes in
911:
When Sitush points out above that your contributions list shows no traces of the edits that appear automatically in the course of doing the Adventure,
884:
interest in it: you "clean up" like a bull cleans up a china shop. Another example: removing a bare list of a writer's works as a copyright violation
1998:
847:
1241:
Dear Bishonen. I am bluntly stating that you have all the appearances of being an involved administrator since Sitush was frantically signalling
964:
has simply forgotten to set up the block after issuing the notice. Either way, you should not be editing articles and I will be reverting you. -
1171:
So I am asking you to why such quarrelsome and uncivil editors like Sitush get so much leeway at Knowledge and other editors are drummed out ?
662:
That's fine. I will ask for you to be blocked now since it is blindingly obvious you are a returning contributor and probably a block evader. -
2107:
The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a
1618:
922:(When he rejected that pact, you followed him within hours to at least two articles you hadn't previously edited and removed content from them.
1467:
Hi Sigma, I am an uninvolved editor, but am only here to point something out. Just letting you know, many of the questions you are asking are
960:
You have not been unblocked. There is either a technical issue of some sort (if the block notice is intended to trigger an actual block) or
62:
1511:
to use leading questions. It is just a lot less likely that someone will respond. You definitely do seem upset, and I suggest that you go
474:
Look, India- and Pakistan-related stuff is absolutely plagued with sockpuppets and meatfarms. While we are supposed to assume good faith,
1738:
Hello Help channel. Please request an uninvolved administrator of this website to assist me with my above mentioned doubts and queries.
2167:
829:
825:
247:
38:
1178:
PS: I just tried to email you but my unblock request but there is some problem, but you can send me email at hrm2014WG00972 <AT: -->
1992:
1819:
1725:
69:
22:
1528:
This "request for help" is disingenuous. It is clear that its purpose is not, in fact, to solicit help, but rather to make various
1442:
Is using the terms "Piss Off" and "F*ck Off" considered as "Uncivil" ? How should we respond to editors when these terms are used ?
1414:
Is there any reference book for drafting ARBIPA appeal? (The AE template is only for the format,not for the content of an appeal).
1313:
1448:
Is it also correct that ARBCOM has disbanded the BASC, but Jimbo Wales still has power to overturn even ARBCOM applied sanctions?
1292:
1033:
238:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means
1837:
1) Is it correct that ARBIPA enforcement blocks are for 1 month initially and then to be increased progressively up to 1 year
1678:
right now, I don't think you have a foot left. If you want any chance at editing Knowledge again, you need to shut up, take a
1140:. I also found he is regularly saying similar things to other editors on his talk page, asking them to F***O**, Go away etc.
2054:
255:
1288:
Dear Bishonen, Your statement that you don't edit pages on India is incorrect. You and Sitush have both closely edited here
1357:
OHP) by our faculty and did not use my user account but some arbitrary named account generated as part of the instruction.
1126:
When I found after 3 days his approach was not working and causing more problems, I voluntarily offered him the "pact" in
52:
1147:
As you watch Sitush's talk page, I wonder you did not block / caution Sitush earlier instead of acting like his involved
2066:
57:
164:
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Knowledge without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
2163:
2084:
2072:
1312:
Dear Bishonen, it is also unclear why you have been so harsh and biased with me compared to this Indian page editor
2060:
851:
251:
877:
notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
2157:
2152:
2078:
2016:
815:
263:
1838:
259:
1770:
If you want to appeal your block the instructions to do so are included in your block notice. The use of the
1289:
1151:
by blocking me and despite seeing that I repeatedly was warning Sitush to be CIVIL and not use bad language.
2004:
1431:
Can you at least confirm that you are not in breach of WP:SOCK? - Sitush (talk) 02:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
1029:
644:, F***O**. As it seems you behave this way with everybody, I'm not taking this personally and ignoring you.
1274:
PS: It was certainly an accident that I read the dictionary in that way, and stopped reading at "butt in".
1651:
1596:
1543:
941:
Because somebody with better sense seems to have unblocked me, I will not be replying to your unwarranted
772:
243:
43:
29:
897:
to look like a sock of a banned editor by your evasive behaviour, for instance in the conversation above,
725:
You also need to use your judgement as to how important something is to fight about it. The emptying of
1674:
Hey, I am not an uninvolved admin, but I am an uninvolved editor. You are shooting yourself in the foot
276:
80:
689:
a high bar to entry, and a persistent 90/10 gender gap among editors all point to the possibility that
1981:
1892:
1841:
1756:
1743:
1626:
1572:
1486:
1453:
1429:
Is there any Knowledge policy which compels editors to answer leading questions put by other user eg.
1358:
1316:
1295:
1275:
1182:
1070:
1037:
1010:
988:
946:
753:
695:
645:
528:
440:
412:
341:
311:
25:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
1969:
1246:
1232:
516:
404:
204:
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does
76:
33:
1918:
1263:
942:
780:
739:
370:
88:
2187:
2134:
2048:
1873:
1823:
1729:
1343:
1221:
1207:
1090:
1006:
932:
859:
239:
87:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
1647:
1592:
1563:
1539:
1468:
479:
242:
administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the
173:
165:
138:
106:
92:
141:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
2173:
1922:
1865:
1856:
1806:
1785:
1774:
1712:
1683:
1516:
1472:
969:
836:
667:
631:
606:
570:
527:
is treated as policy. I will shortly ask Shri Wales to clarify his statement about WP:PACT.
487:
430:
394:
385:
you appear to have latched on to me. Can you at least confirm that you are not in breach of
300:
271:
101:
to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
1682:, and finish your AE request. Don't stir up more stuff, don't even reply to me. Just do. --
846:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the
1529:
1398:
has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the
905:
337:
333:
439:
How convenient. Could you share those emails publicly instead of resorting to innuendo ?
1109:
722:
articles. That would involve both deleting questionable content and writing new content.
2108:
1679:
1512:
1162:
saying "Piss off" to an user who is genuinely trying to understand Knowledge's policies
1002:
901:
850:
on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (
776:
735:
512:
475:
386:
366:
181:
169:
150:
142:
1245:
to block me - and was very confident that I would be blocked too. I am concerned with
1105:- an India related article, where Sitush said "I suggest that you butt out of this".
482:
is just one of many documented examples of how extreme the problem can be at times. -
197:
2183:
2130:
2043:
1869:
1339:
1217:
1086:
984:
961:
928:
890:
Persistently acting in this way, and repelling all complaints, gets very disruptive.
855:
726:
524:
520:
292:
1266:
who Sitush had also said he would write up for a ARBIPA block on Sitush's talkpage
1262:
it he was certain you would do it. Why for instance have you not similarly blocked
425:
Eh? I am getting emails about you and thought it better to be open about things. -
102:
48:
1799:
1705:
642:
160:
1404:
template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.
1130:
so that we did not keep butting each other while editing articles. His reply was
1952:
Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found
1781:
1625:. I am not posting links outside of Knowledge which amplify this aspect better.
1437:
965:
663:
627:
626:
So, are you going to answer the question I asked at the start of this thread? -
602:
566:
561:
There are many widely-accepted essays that are not policy. At least one of them
483:
426:
390:
329:
296:
229:
72:, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Knowledge.
1102:
291:
This is very simple: you either back off following me around or I take you to
888:
336:
where YOU reverted all my edits with your frivolous edit summaries and your
177:
146:
129:
2144:
803:
2190:
2137:
1925:
1900:
1876:
1859:
1849:
1789:
1764:
1751:
1686:
1655:
1634:
1600:
1580:
1547:
1519:
1494:
1475:
1461:
1366:
1346:
1324:
1303:
1283:
1224:
1190:
1093:
1078:
1045:
1018:
996:
973:
954:
935:
914:, you ignore that and "reply" with a list of irrelevant policy shortcuts.
862:
784:
761:
743:
703:
671:
653:
635:
610:
574:
536:
491:
448:
434:
420:
398:
374:
349:
319:
304:
281:
185:
154:
110:
225:
124:
133:
1267:
2170:, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
1291:. And you both also have closely spaced edits on India Talk pages
1001:
Was I editing disruptively when I exposed that the BLP article on
328:
Are you also seriously suggesting that I "followed you around" to
221:
84:
168:. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
2102:
EDITING ACCESS IS BLOCKED,and email to admin is out of question.
410:
target, to undermine, frighten, or discourage them from editing.
813:
and for editing disruptively on Indian articles, you have been
601:
BTW, WP:AGF isn't policy either, although it is a guideline. -
1794:
1700:
1417:
Is it better to appeal to AE or AN notice board for my block ?
1383:
208:
imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
1121:
I was doing exactly as Sitush had himself instructed me to do
232:, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is
2143:
1840:? If so, why was I blocked indefinitely under this policy ?
802:
21:
Hello, Sigmabaroda, and welcome to Knowledge! Thank you for
832:) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:
1946:
Arbitration enforcement action appeal by <Username: -->
824:
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the
176:
if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --
841:
Your reason here OR place the reason below this template.
734:
Enjoy your time at Knowledge and try to make friends! -
132:. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
2022:
2010:
1811:
1717:
1203:
1158:
1144:
resolution processes relating to his very poor edits.
1131:
1064:
1058:
1032:
for this section ? It is a blatant copy-paste. Or this
1024:
925:
923:
915:
912:
909:
898:
885:
719:
562:
454:
363:
97:
1780:
template is not going to help you in this instance. --
854:), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
1202:
Apparently you believe a post by Sitush on my page,
1108:
Since the Dictionary definition of "butt out" means
904:?") instead stonewalling with irrelevant quotes and
1818:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their
1724:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their
1809:has been answered. If you need more help, you can
1715:has been answered. If you need more help, you can
1260:would be blocked before my WP:3O would be taken up
1942:I am starting a draft of my Unblock Appeal to AE
254:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as
1439:. Does it have any other usage on Knowledge ?
839:|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ].
8:
1621:User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee
887:shows you're not au fait with copyright law.
687:An entrenched, stubborn elite of old-timers,
1810:
1716:
872:In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following
796:Blocked to enforce an arbitration decision
1115:to strike one another instead of meshing.
216:The Arbitration Committee has authorised
1111:to strike or push with the head or horns
848:arbitration enforcement appeals template
212:Please carefully read this information:
1160:Synonimizing an user with the devil,
7:
1410:I am planning to send Block Appeal.
1396:request for help from administrators
874:procedure instructing administrators
2040:Administrator imposing the sanction
1561:Dear editor who uses the pseudonym
2099:Notification of that administrator
14:
1643:The editor who uses the pseudonym
1588:The editor who uses the pseudonym
1535:The editor who uses the pseudonym
1798:
1704:
1387:
1036:. Are these reliable sources ?
196:
159:
123:
58:How to create your first article
1253:block because Sitush specially
220:to be used for pages regarding
2191:08:41, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
2138:08:42, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
2116:Statement by <Username: -->
1623:19:31, 11 December 2011 (UTC)"
1557:CONFLICT OF INTEREST - REPORT'
68:You may also want to take the
1:
718:A look at your contributions
362:Hi Sigmabaroda, In this edit
282:17:21, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
186:17:04, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
44:The five pillars of Knowledge
1926:18:11, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
1901:17:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
1877:11:29, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
1860:04:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
1850:04:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
1790:04:14, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
1765:04:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
1752:04:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
1687:15:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
1656:15:46, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
1635:02:33, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
1601:16:35, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
1581:06:07, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
1548:12:12, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
1520:04:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
1495:04:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
1476:04:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
1462:05:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
1367:04:57, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
1347:22:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
1325:20:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
1304:20:10, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
1284:19:50, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
1225:18:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
1191:17:44, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
1094:10:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
1079:07:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
1046:05:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
1019:04:48, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
997:04:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
974:04:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
955:04:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
936:16:15, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
863:16:15, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
785:22:21, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
762:20:21, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
744:20:07, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
704:16:39, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
672:16:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
654:16:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
636:16:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
611:07:33, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
575:06:38, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
537:06:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
492:06:11, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
449:06:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
435:05:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
421:04:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
399:02:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
1822:, or consider visiting the
1728:, or consider visiting the
1380:Questions for administrator
870:Reminder to administrators:
375:14:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
350:17:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
320:16:58, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
305:16:50, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
155:17:08, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
2206:
1938:Draft_Unblock_Appeal_to_AE
111:09:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
63:Simplified Manual of Style
2168:guide to appealing blocks
1426:made by the other editor.
826:guide to appealing blocks
691:Knowledge is going adrift
172:. Please make use of the
39:Contributing to Knowledge
1896:
1845:
1760:
1747:
1630:
1576:
1490:
1457:
1362:
1320:
1299:
1279:
1186:
1181:in and I will reply it.
1074:
1041:
1014:
992:
950:
757:
699:
649:
532:
515:is not a policy whereas
476:it is not a suicide pact
444:
416:
345:
315:
2032:Sanction being appealed
641:To use your own phrase
218:discretionary sanctions
53:How to develop articles
2148:
1375:Help please from admin
983:point above including
807:
2178:Your reason here ~~~~
2166:by first reading the
2147:
2129:instructions below.
806:
563:has been cited by you
248:standards of behavior
1813:ask another question
1719:ask another question
811:arbitration decision
256:editing restrictions
244:purpose of Knowledge
1264:User:Dev raj gujjar
89:Knowledge:Questions
75:Please remember to
70:Knowledge Adventure
2149:
2120:<Your text: -->
1179:sigma <DOT: -->
1007:President of India
808:
49:How to edit a page
23:your contributions
2164:appeal this block
1974:
1963:
1958:
1833:My first question
1830:
1829:
1815:on your talk page
1736:
1735:
1721:on your talk page
1645:
1617:Since you asked,
1590:
1537:
1469:Leading questions
1408:
1407:
878:
280:
79:your messages on
2197:
2181:
2094:
2035:INDEFINITE BLOCK
2026:
1999:deleted contribs
1965:
1960:
1950:
1817:
1802:
1795:
1779:
1773:
1723:
1708:
1701:
1641:
1586:
1533:
1507:Well, it is not
1402:
1391:
1390:
1384:
1258:clearly wrote I
868:
845:
844:
274:
200:
163:
127:
100:
2205:
2204:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2193:
2171:
2126:
2118:
2046:
1984:
1948:
1940:
1777:
1771:
1699:
1400:
1388:
1382:
1377:
1236:
1180:ac <DOT: -->
1149:fairy godfather
1128:very good faith
1103:Daya Singh Bedi
880:
834:
833:
822:from editing.
799:
773:Aryan migration
382:
360:
334:Aam Aadmi Party
289:
268:
267:
201:
193:
121:
96:
83:by typing four
34:Getting started
19:
12:
11:
5:
2203:
2201:
2150:You have been
2142:
2125:
2124:September 2016
2122:
2117:
2114:
2104:
2103:
2100:
2096:
2095:
2041:
2037:
2036:
2033:
2029:
2028:
1979:
1978:Appealing user
1947:
1944:
1939:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1828:
1827:
1820:user talk page
1803:
1793:
1792:
1734:
1733:
1726:user talk page
1709:
1698:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1569:
1559:
1551:
1550:
1530:pointy remarks
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1479:
1478:
1450:
1449:
1446:
1443:
1440:
1434:
1427:
1418:
1415:
1406:
1405:
1401:{{admin help}}
1392:
1381:
1378:
1376:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1351:
1350:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1314:Capankajsmilyo
1307:
1306:
1271:
1270:
1269:. ie. Why me ?
1235:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1212:
1211:
1199:
1198:
1169:
1168:
1098:
1097:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1009:was so shitty.
1003:Pratibha Patil
977:
976:
866:
828:(specifically
809:To enforce an
801:
798:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
768:
732:
731:
723:
711:
710:
709:
708:
707:
706:
677:
676:
675:
674:
657:
656:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
381:
378:
359:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
323:
322:
288:
285:
250:, or relevant
202:
195:
194:
192:
189:
120:
117:
115:
66:
65:
60:
55:
46:
41:
36:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2202:
2192:
2189:
2185:
2179:
2175:
2169:
2165:
2160:
2159:
2155:
2154:
2146:
2141:
2139:
2136:
2132:
2123:
2121:
2115:
2113:
2112:
2110:
2101:
2098:
2097:
2092:
2089:
2086:
2083:
2080:
2077:
2074:
2071:
2068:
2065:
2062:
2059:
2056:
2053:
2050:
2045:
2042:
2039:
2038:
2034:
2031:
2030:
2024:
2021:
2018:
2015:
2012:
2009:
2006:
2003:
2000:
1997:
1994:
1991:
1988:
1983:
1980:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1973:
1971:
1970:WP:UNINVOLVED
1962:
1959:
1957:
1955:
1945:
1943:
1937:
1927:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1878:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1858:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1834:
1825:
1821:
1816:
1814:
1808:
1804:
1801:
1797:
1796:
1791:
1787:
1783:
1776:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1754:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1739:
1731:
1727:
1722:
1720:
1714:
1710:
1707:
1703:
1702:
1696:
1688:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1657:
1653:
1649:
1644:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1622:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1589:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1567:
1565:
1560:
1558:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1536:
1531:
1527:
1521:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1477:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1447:
1444:
1441:
1438:
1435:
1432:
1428:
1425:
1419:
1416:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1403:
1397:
1393:
1386:
1385:
1379:
1374:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1348:
1345:
1341:
1336:
1335:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1315:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1290:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1272:
1268:
1265:
1261:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1247:WP:ADMINABUSE
1244:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1234:
1233:WP:ADMINABUSE
1231:
1226:
1223:
1219:
1214:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1200:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1176:
1172:
1166:
1165:
1163:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1145:
1141:
1139:
1138:
1134:
1129:
1124:
1122:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1106:
1104:
1095:
1092:
1088:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1067:
1062:
1061:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1026:
1023:Look at this
1022:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
999:
998:
994:
990:
986:
981:
980:
979:
978:
975:
971:
967:
963:
959:
958:
957:
956:
952:
948:
944:
939:
937:
934:
930:
926:
924:
921:
917:
913:
910:
907:
906:alphabet soup
903:
899:
896:
891:
889:
886:
881:
879:
875:
871:
865:
864:
861:
857:
853:
849:
842:
838:
831:
827:
821:
818:
817:
812:
805:
797:
794:
786:
782:
778:
774:
769:
765:
764:
763:
759:
755:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
741:
737:
728:
727:D. P. Agrawal
724:
720:
717:
716:
715:
705:
701:
697:
694:
692:
688:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
673:
669:
665:
661:
660:
659:
658:
655:
651:
647:
643:
640:
639:
638:
637:
633:
629:
612:
608:
604:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
517:WP:HARASSMENT
514:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
456:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:
436:
432:
428:
424:
423:
422:
418:
414:
411:
406:
403:
402:
401:
400:
396:
392:
388:
379:
377:
376:
372:
368:
364:
357:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
326:
325:
324:
321:
317:
313:
309:
308:
307:
306:
302:
298:
294:
286:
284:
283:
278:
273:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
214:
213:
209:
207:
199:
191:ARBIPA notice
190:
188:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
162:
157:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
118:
116:
113:
112:
108:
104:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
73:
71:
64:
61:
59:
56:
54:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
37:
35:
31:
28:
27:
26:
24:
16:
2177:
2158:indefinitely
2156:
2151:
2127:
2119:
2106:
2105:
2087:
2081:
2075:
2069:
2063:
2057:
2051:
2019:
2013:
2007:
2001:
1995:
1989:
1986:
1966:
1964:
1961:
1951:
1949:
1941:
1919:WP:BOOMERANG
1836:
1832:
1831:
1812:
1807:help request
1755:
1740:
1737:
1718:
1713:help request
1675:
1648:JamesBWatson
1642:
1620:
1593:JamesBWatson
1587:
1564:JamesBWatson
1562:
1556:
1540:JamesBWatson
1534:
1508:
1451:
1430:
1422:
1409:
1399:
1259:
1254:
1250:
1242:
1177:
1173:
1170:
1161:
1159:
1153:
1148:
1146:
1142:
1136:
1132:
1127:
1125:
1120:
1119:repeat that
1114:
1110:
1107:
1099:
1065:
1059:
1056:
1034:Vigil Online
1030:Arun Shourie
940:
919:
894:
892:
882:
869:
867:
840:
830:this section
823:
820:indefinitely
819:
814:
800:
795:
733:
712:
690:
686:
625:
408:
383:
380:Clean start?
361:
290:
269:
215:
211:
210:
205:
203:
166:edit summary
158:
145:. Thanks. --
143:my talk page
122:
119:October 2015
114:
93:my talk page
91:, ask me on
74:
67:
30:Introduction
20:
2067:protections
1982:Sigmabaroda
1923:allthefoxes
1917:Beware the
1893:Sigmabaroda
1866:allthefoxes
1857:allthefoxes
1842:Sigmabaroda
1757:Sigmabaroda
1744:Sigmabaroda
1684:allthefoxes
1627:Sigmabaroda
1573:Sigmabaroda
1517:allthefoxes
1513:take a walk
1487:Sigmabaroda
1473:allthefoxes
1454:Sigmabaroda
1359:Sigmabaroda
1317:Sigmabaroda
1296:Sigmabaroda
1276:Sigmabaroda
1208:WP:INVOLVED
1183:Sigmabaroda
1071:Sigmabaroda
1057:Please see
1038:Sigmabaroda
1011:Sigmabaroda
989:Sigmabaroda
947:Sigmabaroda
754:Sigmabaroda
730:appreciate.
696:Sigmabaroda
646:Sigmabaroda
529:Sigmabaroda
441:Sigmabaroda
413:Sigmabaroda
342:Sigmabaroda
340:attitude ?
338:WP:BULLYing
330:Rajiv Dixit
312:Sigmabaroda
272:regentspark
230:Afghanistan
128:Hello, I'm
2079:page moves
2017:block user
2011:filter log
1864:Thank you
1509:disallowed
1251:indefinite
943:inquistion
480:WP:LTA/IAC
405:HARASSMENT
240:uninvolved
103:-- Aronzak
98:click here
81:talk pages
2073:deletions
2023:block log
777:Kautilya3
736:Kautilya3
367:Kautilya3
2184:Bishonen
2176:|reason=
2131:Bishonen
2055:contribs
2044:Bishonen
1993:contribs
1870:Bishonen
1824:Teahouse
1730:Teahouse
1340:Bishonen
1255:involved
1218:Bishonen
1133:Piss off
1087:Bishonen
962:Bishonen
929:Bishonen
856:Bishonen
852:by email
767:content.
358:Sourcing
287:Stalking
252:policies
226:Pakistan
170:reverted
17:Welcome!
2174:unblock
2153:blocked
1775:help me
1697:Help me
1676:SO HARD
1028:Patil'
902:WP:SOCK
837:unblock
816:blocked
513:WP:PACT
387:WP:SOCK
277:comment
174:sandbox
139:sandbox
2085:rights
2061:blocks
1782:Majora
1585:Am I?
1249:in my
985:WP:TWA
966:Sitush
895:trying
843:~~~~}}
664:Sitush
628:Sitush
603:Sitush
567:Sitush
525:WP:NPA
521:WP:AGF
484:Sitush
427:Sitush
391:Sitush
297:Sitush
293:WP:ANI
264:blocks
246:, our
228:, and
134:Ramdev
85:tildes
1805:This
1711:This
1640:one.
1424:(UTC)
1394:This
1137:devil
1113:, or
262:, or
222:India
95:, or
2188:talk
2135:talk
2109:diff
2049:talk
2005:logs
1987:talk
1954:here
1897:talk
1874:talk
1846:talk
1786:talk
1761:talk
1748:talk
1680:WALK
1652:talk
1631:talk
1597:talk
1577:talk
1544:talk
1515:. --
1491:talk
1458:talk
1363:talk
1344:talk
1321:talk
1300:talk
1280:talk
1222:talk
1204:here
1187:talk
1135:...
1091:talk
1075:talk
1066:this
1060:this
1042:talk
1025:diff
1015:talk
993:talk
970:talk
951:talk
933:talk
916:Here
860:talk
781:talk
775:. -
758:talk
740:talk
700:talk
668:talk
650:talk
632:talk
607:talk
571:talk
565:. -
533:talk
523:and
488:talk
455:here
445:talk
431:talk
417:talk
395:talk
389:? -
371:talk
346:talk
332:and
316:talk
301:talk
295:. -
260:bans
234:here
182:talk
178:Ronz
151:talk
147:Ronz
130:Ronz
107:talk
77:sign
51:and
32:and
2182:.
2091:RfA
1650:" (
1595:" (
1542:" (
1243:you
1123:.
206:not
2186:|
2180:}}
2172:{{
2140:.
2133:|
1972:).
1921:--
1899:)
1872:|
1848:)
1788:)
1778:}}
1772:{{
1763:)
1750:)
1654:)
1633:)
1599:)
1579:)
1546:)
1493:)
1460:)
1452:--
1365:)
1342:|
1323:)
1302:)
1294:,
1282:)
1220:|
1189:)
1089:|
1077:)
1044:)
1017:)
995:)
987:.
972:)
953:)
938:.
931:|
927:)
858:|
835:{{
783:)
760:)
742:)
702:)
670:)
652:)
634:)
609:)
573:)
535:)
519:,
490:)
478:.
447:)
433:)
419:)
407:-
397:)
373:)
348:)
318:)
303:)
270:--
258:,
236:.
224:,
184:)
153:)
109:)
2093:)
2088:·
2082:·
2076:·
2070:·
2064:·
2058:·
2052:·
2047:(
2027:–
2025:)
2020:·
2014:·
2008:·
2002:·
1996:·
1990:·
1985:(
1895:(
1879:.
1844:(
1826:.
1784:(
1759:(
1746:(
1732:.
1646:"
1629:(
1591:"
1575:(
1568:.
1566:"
1538:"
1489:(
1456:(
1433:?
1361:(
1349:.
1319:(
1298:(
1278:(
1227:.
1210:.
1185:(
1167:.
1096:.
1073:(
1040:(
1013:(
991:(
968:(
949:(
945:.
779:(
756:(
738:(
698:(
693:.
666:(
648:(
630:(
605:(
569:(
531:(
486:(
443:(
429:(
415:(
393:(
369:(
344:(
314:(
299:(
279:)
275:(
180:(
149:(
105:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
