User talk:SounderBruce/Archive 35

382: 4174:— Bruce is absolutely correct here. He’s not suggesting that you create a whole new article. Instead, create a page that redirects to the exact section you want to go to. That way, in the future, if another editor changes the section title it’s easy to fix that one redirect... instead of the links on dozens of pages. Also, in the future if you or another editor deem that at grade railway crossings are worthy of a standalone article, you remove that redirect and you have a page that already has dozens of existing links. Bruce’s suggestion is a win-win and I can’t see any downsides to doing it that way. If you wanted an opinion from a third party who also frequently edits these pages, there you go. — 1688: 2432:

believe this would help keep consistency between ST line pages and explain the future naming system more in-depth than the T line in the feature box. The last sentence of the fare sentence seems to be speculation, as the source does not actually have anything about the future cost of link, and I don't believe that ST announces fares 2 years in advance. If I should adjust the pages back to what I did, let me know. Additionally, I'm very new to Knowledge editing, so if it wouldn't be too hard, can you explain on how to properly explain changes?

1791:

which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

2619:

There are some news articles from reliable sources referencing this that I will add to the article. A gubernatorial election seems notable to me, and a party label used by 3 out of 37 candidates in that race--signifying that it is not confined solely to a single fringe or perennial candidate--seems at least a bit notable to me. But I confess I don't have in depth knowledge of the topic and the final call on deletion may be up to the Knowledge community.

1768: 31: 1757: 1907: 3223: 1676: 1746: 2642:. You have some very impressive accomplishments in Knowledge, so I am hoping I can learn something. I could not find any examples of GA-rated Knowledge articles about Census Designated Places, so I was "on my own" for North Potomac. It is also difficult, at times, to find suitable references. Do not hesitate to reorder or rearrange the current article. I will use it as an example for future CDP articles such as 1096: 1210:

would be enough content to create a new article for these old depots, especially with the new articles being GA or FA. Do you see no value in having the old navigation boxes in the articles, even under a collapsed header? Or they could even have a "Former services at X location" like I did at Everett. The northern Cascades stations with no history mentioned is iffy I agree, and fine (IMO) to be removed there.

1700: 2305: 543:. The color hex code I'd like to change it to (now that STA has branding for the line) is 8f498d (which will be the color used on the bus livery and station branding) but Knowledge seems to not be able to recognize the line name and it defaults the color to the 00ccff hex code that's set up for STA routes. The only way I can change its appearance is by editing the default hex code. I'm following 3339: 2572: 2209: 1963: 834: 2315: 1779: 1713: 3487:: The vast majority of other Seattle mayoral articles use CS1, which has differences that readers could notice. As a series, it should be kept consistent. I thank you for your efforts in expanding the article, but please develop it in a visible draft or userspace draft and seek copyediting input, as it really messy. The newspaper citations were also incorrectly formatted, with the wrong 1736: 1726: 3383: 3129: 2346: 2255: 4353: 3280: 2513: 775: 2798:. I saw you removed the awards section of the paper. Are they not notable to the paper and its history? I could be wrong, but I feel like they play a part in telling the story of the paper. Maybe there is a better way than a table to display them? I am new to creating pages and everything so just wanted to reach out for more understanding. Go Sounders!! :) 3895: 3021: 2462: 2158: 724: 669: 3056: 1113:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 937:

mainly the picture at the information at the fleet section is to tell readers that I have the picture of 40' Phantom on its last days and I don't think others were as lucky as I am since the bus was running on my local route at that time. So, in your permission, I can just add the picture and not adding the retirement. Thanks, JC1199154.

3709:, the article already had a set of coordinates at the bottom. An article cannot have two coordinate tags that have the title parameter enabled, so an error message was shown at the bottom. Also, coordinates should include the type parameter with the place type (in this case, landmark) and region (US-WA). 3928:

Hi SounderBruce, please you get it on the internet for CPTDB Wiki into list the bus for Community Transit currently expect coach number the same everything also own with Wiki you ABSOLUTION! Only one the new bus coach number 19100's (24) series in Snohomish County now. Well, but I can't hear and I am

3075:

was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with

2618:

article in the past. When editing that article again this past week to reflect Goodspaceguy's most recent run for office, I noticed that he was running as a "Trump Republican" which is a different party label than he has used in the past. So I created this article to give myself something to link to.

3509:

SounderBruce, Perhaps you misunderstood me :). I didn’t question your edit in its entirety, and your contributions were welcome and necessary improvements. You were right to notice and fix my mistake with the Seattle Times editor, for example, and I’ll try to be more careful next time. I’m not sure,

2431:

Hi! I'm a frequent lurker on STB, and I really enjoy your articles. I has a couple questions about your comment about my edits made on the Orange Line article. First off, I added a sentence in the intro explaining the name change to the T line in 2021, similar to the sentence on the Red line page. I

1517:

I noticed you've changed the cost of the Austin FC stadium back to $ 242 million from the update I made this week, to reflect the true cost of the stadium which is $ 260 million. The original sum quoted, $ 242 million, was correct in 2018, but the investment cost has risen to $ 260 million, a figure

936:

About the information of the last 40' Gillig Phantom, yes, it did retired 6 days after I took the picture I recently posted on Knowledge and Wikimedia. I found out from Canadian Public Transportation Discussion Board, aka CPTDB, over the wiki page at King County Metro page. The reason I want to post

875:

Hello SounderBruce, thank you for leaving that message on the talk page of my, it is really appreciated, if you believe that i am wording my edit summaries incorrectly then i would be glad to accept some tips from you as well as i am reading the article on edit summaries. Also i like that photograph

1790:

The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for

1665:

The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12

340:

The pandemic has largely shut down the city, but we're starting to see a slower growth in cases. A few people I know have tested positive, but they aren't in need of hospitalization. Other than the lack of appropriate masks and some shortages at stores, things are doing fairly well (and the weather

329:

station, but I do know that there are a few with devoted followings/pilgrimages that have likely been covered enough to be notable on their own. The U.S. turnpikes don't have articles on their equivalent service stations, but I think a few of the more notable ones with extensive news coverage could

1402:

and it was in no real order, so the articles using ProveIt will have a confusing order (jumping from authors to url to title to date to publication name at the very end) for editors to deal with. These automated tools are problematic for those who choose to do things manually (like myself) and can

1248:

It's a bit misleading to put the GN/NP succession boxes for stations that did not inherit the old structure or had continual railroad ownership. Most of the intermediate former stations would also be ineligible for proper articles, as they were little more than wooden shacks next to the tracks. It

1209:

I understand most of the Sounder stations were not at the original locations of the historic railroads. And all of the articles look great, but with the History section mentioning the historic railroads I figured most locations would fine with the collapsed "former services" section. I doubt there

388:

Talk page stalker here. Washington got an early jolt, so took early action, and never saw the super fast growth rates that a lot of states saw. It has the longest doubling time among most-affected states, and has held the cases to about 1 per 1000 people. Good job. In California, we're lagging

3690:

I see that you did a few edits to this article after me and described my addition of coordinates to the infobox as "sloppy", however when I look at the page as it now stands it doesn't seem like anything has changed visually. Just wondering if there is anything I should know before making similar

359:

Thanks for the input, I'm glad to hear that its slowing down there. I wish I could say the same for Japan. I think I'll work on a "listicle" for now that divides them up by prefecture. For other matters I'll catch you at the chat then! Take care, and I hope the people you know recover smoothly.

1421:

They will all have the same order and it's not irregular. If you'd like to raise the issue with the ProveIt developers, feel free to. If you'd like to mess the page up and revert great changes for some arbitrary order provide in template documentation, that would be a bad idea. If you want to do

2903:

I think it would take too much time and effort from the STM's side to create a separate webpage and compile all the data just for a personal request. I will message them as a suggestion, but in the meantime, I will leave it as offline citation, with the Access to Information number and point of

2052:

Even if you do not use RedWarn at the moment, or you do (tysm), I would greatly appreciate feedback of any kind. While I go round Twinkle users, sounding like that broadband salesperson in the mall that nobody ever wants to speak to, I'd like some updated feedback from recent and current users.

1070:

Fair enough. I'd just say that creating that kind of redirect might make it more likely that someone notices the article doesn't exist and create an incomplete article for it. Also, worst case-scenario, someone does create an incomplete article, you can always expand it yourself by amending and

2820:

the organization's awards are of national prestige, in which case all category winners should be listed. Your draft has a long way to go before it can be published, and I suggest rewriting it to go beyond the "In X year, Y happened" format. The citations need to also be re-done properly (with

2613:

I note that this article has been proposed for deletion. I created this article but actually don't know much more about the topic beyond what is already in the brief article. The article actually does not claim, and is not intended to claim, that this is a registered party. I have edited the

1518:

that has been quoted in media as it is the correct representation of the cost of the stadium. You cited it as highly promotional, but it is a fact that the costs rose, hence the investment rose. Someone looking for the cost of the stadium will see an incorrect figure now, hence the change.

3608:

that is still the latest precedent that stated: “editors should not attempt to convert Knowledge to their own preferred style, nor should they edit articles for the sole purpose of converting them to their preferred style, or removing examples of, or references to, styles which they

948:

CPTBD is not a reliable source, so you must not make those changes unless there is a newspaper report, Metro document/webpage, or other good source that you can cite. A gallery is generally not used in articles except for rare situations, and especially not for a single image.

1666:

featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

1052:, I've been pulling most of my drafts out of draftspace because the draft patrollers are the kind to delete first and ask questions later. It's not a good policy and generally not good for an editor like myself who prefers slow and careful research over rushing to be first. 3510:

however, that these easy-to-fix issues of small scale warrant your recommendation for me to seek some kind of editorial screening prior to publishing. I do welcome your feedback and suggestions, but politely decline the idea of posting drafts for approval. Are we good here?

4081:) to keep things consistent for scripts and automated bots. When directly linking to sections, this can muddle things and the section title may change and thus break the link. Changing the section link in a redirect is far easier than doing so for dozens of articles. 2108:

My goal is to create the most user friendly moderation tool, and that's why I need your feedback to help make this truely the most favorable anti-vandal tool. While we will never elliminate vandalism on this site, we can get closer to fighting it quickly and easily.

2701:, Sorry about the delay. I've had a busy week and am a bit burnt out on reviewing due to some off-wiki happenings. I'll try to wrap up my comments soon and leave an extended window for you to make changes, in light of your situation. Good luck with the house move. 1005:, I already have a draft of the 2001 election in progress that I intend to move from userspace to mainspace eventually. Since it was a fairly important and controversial election in the city's history, I don't want it to be misrepresented with an incomplete entry. 3572:

Since it's already published, let's get to specifics and fix it together. I do welcome your input, but it needs to be specific, so that I can take further steps. What terms aren't used properly? What sections are hard to read? I thought I did my best yesterday...

2842:, Thank you! I really appreciate all the help I am sure it's annoying to get these unfitted pages. I will fix it up and resubmit soon! Also random, but I saw you were a photographer and writer on your page, I am studying photojournalism at Penn State! Best, Noah. 1464:

I saw you were active in the Knowledge community and had also made an edit to the page last year. Would you be so kind as to make this correction? I would do it myself but try to err on the side of caution due to my inherent conflict of interest. Many thanks,

1027:. When no article exists, but a draft titled like that is in progress, when someone goes to create an article in article space a prompt is present saying formal draft does exist for the article. To see how this works, look at the currently nonexistent article 1147:

I wanted to thank you again for the very detailed GA review. I know we disagreed on a few points, but I really appreciate the effort and thought you put into the review. If you have any GAs in the queue that you'd like reviewed, please let me know! Cheers,

471:

Hi! Thanks for your review of my bio of John Anderson. I saw that you had a number of issues with it, and I'd like to make it better. Could you tell me what you think I need to improve, please? The generic tags don't help me much I'm afraid. Thanks!

3550:

is CS2, not CS1 and uses commas instead of periods between parameters. It makes a difference when exporting citations for other uses. I would highly recommend getting copyediting done, as the article is hard to read and many terms aren't used properly.

4316:. It will be used as a pattern for at least two other CDPs in Maryland that I will probably finish sometime this year. I learned some new code from you: {{convert|3|mi|km|spell=in}} for three miles (4.8 km)—I had been doing that the hard way. Cheers! 3794:

Er ... why? Of course more complete is better than less complete, but surely some links are better than no links. Imagine if the standard were that no Knowledge page could be published unless everything mentioned it with a Wiki page was wiki-linked

3594:(“There are various benefits to using a template, most notably that doing so produces a consistent look, You are not required to use CS2”), CS2 seems to be a preferred style among others, that is if you have a clean start due to “consistent look.” 495:. I was wondering, would you mind reviewing one of the four other tropical cyclone related FACs? In the spirit of no quid pro quo, I'd ask you not to review mine (Gamede), but one of the other hurricane articles. Hope you're doing well :) ♫ 2726:- I will try to get things cleaned up in seven days, but might not be able to since we are packing and I will be at the new house all day tomorrow for W/D & cable/internet installation. Hopefully I can get some things done Friday. 909:. You should only add the official government website, and leave the others to the discretion of more experienced editors. You should also avoid adding lists of highways without prose, as they serve no real purpose for the readers. 3071: 2933:, and addressed the advertisement like tone. I did a bunch of rewording and removed comments like "state of the art," etc. I've removed the tag, please have a look and see if you think anything else should be done. 3964:, You need a reliable source to update information on Knowledge. The CPTDB Wiki is fan-made and is not a reliable source. It's fine for information here to be outdated if a suitable reliable source cannot be found. 4099:

I would not want to escalate this into an edit war. That said, there are plenty of redirects to specific sections within articles. For example, there are a number of redirects to specific sections within the page

3513:

But back to the question that I did ask. The Citation template is part of CS1 style, isn’t it? My point was that after the consolidation of all the citation templates under the same Lua module a few years back,

3601:: “Editors should not attempt to change an article's established citation style merely on the grounds of personal preference, to make it match other articles, or without first seeking consensus for the change.” 3614:

Therefore, technically speaking, based on 2 & 3, your edit, changing my cs2 to cs1 on the grounds of the consistent style in other mayoral articles is against Knowledge polices, so I reverted it. Sorry :)

298:

throughout Japan would be notable enough for inclusion? There's an equivalent article in Japanese (every station also has its own article as well). I recently got a book that has details about all of them.

3522:

are bound to render the same output, hence it’s no longer necessary to make these distinctions. So, I was just concerned that you were spending time changing those for no apparent benefit. What’s your take?

2045:

In the past few updates, I have added AIV (admin) reporting, a preferences panel, themes, customisation options and made many, many bug fixes and added many features based on your suggestions and feedback.

337:), where you'd have a few paragraphs for each Roadside station in a prefecture or in a given region and bundle them all into a single article. The larger ones can then be broken out into their own articles. 3422: 435:

I do think a merged, international template would be better and under your suggested name of Infobox service area. I totally forgot about the UK service stations, which have their own articles (and an

3659:

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

3063: 2881:

I would ask STM to make this information available on their website first. If that doesn't work, then converting these citations to an offline reference with no link is acceptable (per

2031: 1794:

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

3469:

There was a part of your edit that I don't fully understand -- why change citation templates to cite web/news/journal, if it has no bearing on how these are displayed to readers?

3172: 389:

that by a week or so, but doing OK. Some other states blasted through the 1-per-1000 line with pretty fast growth rates, so are struggling with a big crunch this week and next.

3088: 436: 1487:

Thank you for properly disclosing your conflict of interest. I have made the corrections that you have requested. Feel free to message me again if anything else is needed.

3729: 381: 3653: 1556:, it would be more appropriate to use the true cost later on in the article, rather than tying it to the initial agreement. If you are employed by Austin FC, you should 406:

I've been working on putting together a list-article in my sandbox. There wasn't really an infobox out there that worked for the roadside stations, so I made a new one:

1249:

would be more useful to readers if we linked to an article on the lines and had a list of stations there, rather than trying to create a connection that did not exist.

291:

Hey there, I hope you've been doing alright with Seattle being one of the first badly affected places by the pandemic. Are things getting any better around there yet?

1720:, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews 1335:). And since the vast majority of citations in the article already use the un-hyphenated form, it should follow suit for the sake of easier non-automated searching. 2066:

Would you value customisation features, such as macros or shortcuts, such as adding your own quick revert reasons so the tool can fit your exact editing practices?

4360:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 3287:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 2520:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 2385: 782:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 1452:

incorrectly lists a competitor of ours as the architect. While they did the initial study, we were ultimately selected as the architect per these media reports:

1694:, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points 3569:

Exporting for other uses? Never thought of this one, but this option cannot possibly be uniform across Knowledge... Let me look into it, you got me curious.

1459: 3441:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

3191:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2404:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1023:

I'd recommend having, instead of publishing a redirect (which is almost an invitation for someone to create an article), created your draft in the space

3079:

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

3605: 2679:- I will be moving to a new house in about a week—hopefully we will be able to get internet service up soon. Is there anything I should be doing with 1392:

It's in the order of the parameters that get spit out in normalization, which has all sorts of inconsistencies. I took a look at the TemplateData for

4203:

for making a revision to that section one gets the warning

3950: 3346:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

2579:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

2216:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

1970:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

841:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

4270:

and redirecting it to the section you linked would be a superior option to directly linking to the subsection. It's easier to maintain and change.

4361: 3645: 3637: 3239:

and being one of our best and least lazy American wikipedians, if only we could clone you and have hundreds of editors like you for each state! †

2743:: Feel free to take your time. I am fine with keeping the GAN on hold for a few weeks (as many current nominations have been on hold for months). 4204:. This could be used anywhere when needed. The section carries {{main article|Buffers and chain coupler}}. There is a solution for every thing. 987:. It makes more sense to either create and article there (which I intend on doing in the future), or otherwise having left the page nonexistent. 3652:

for July 18, 2020. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at

1125: 3112: 1842: 1455: 2885:), so long as you can pull it up when asked for verification. The second Dropbox citation does not have a publicly-accessible link, BTW. 1596:

This is due to my usurp request to change my username from an alias, JamesHSmith6789, to a more identifiable one, Ed6767 being accepted.

2930: 2280: 4347: 4343: 4336: 3881: 3874: 3333: 3274: 2566: 2507: 2213: 2203: 1957: 1687: 1032: 828: 769: 1873: 1180: 3438: 3188: 2401: 1805: 407: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 235: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 77: 63: 3620: 3578: 3528: 3474: 2970: 1795: 1756: 127: 123: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 95: 3898:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3024:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2465:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2161:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2030: 727:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

672:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3108: 2283: 1838: 3084: 2795: 1448:

Hi Bruce -- I'm writing on behalf of Populous, a global architecture firm with experience in sports venues. We noticed the

3411: 3402: 3343: 3288: 2199: 2192: 2144: 2137: 1857: 1449: 1211: 1168: 984: 618: 1024: 3946: 2859:

for updating it to Knowledge, and therefore the direct link is not available. How do you suggest going with this case?--

1460:

https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/2018/06/21/nashville-mls-stadium-fairgrounds-contract-firm-nearly-place/721715002/

1028: 3821: 3616: 3574: 3537: 3524: 3484: 3470: 1542: 1109:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 539:

Hello SounderBruce! I was wondering if you could give me a hand editing the color for Spokane Transit's City Line on

2909: 2864: 2852: 1869: 1427: 1376: 1304: 1176: 3656:, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. 4116:

would likely be short and be deemed not noteworthy and thus become a candidate for speedy deletion. One could have

3838: 3663: 3587:

SounderBruce, I looked deeper into CS1/CS2 issue. Yes, you’re correct the citation template is CS2. However, look,

3442: 3428: 3390: 3347: 3192: 3178: 3136: 2580: 2405: 2391: 2353: 2217: 2008: 1971: 1114: 861: 842: 802: 743: 515:, I'll look into it, but I'm a bit stretched between my pet expansion project and helping shorten the GAN backlog. 38: 1639:

Also, if you're interested in live discussion regarding the development and help with using RedWarn, why not join

341:

is improving). If you want to chat more, I'm usually idling in the AARoads Forum chatroom with a few other folks.

3156: 2966: 2958: 2856: 2286: 274:- 1683:, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points 1105: 3329: 3322: 3270: 3263: 3007: 3000: 2655: 2100: 1967: 1632: 1623: 477: 4384: 1422:

things manually, feel free to, but don't revert changes that apply a consistent order and correct parameters.

1470: 1403:

result in their own problems, like repeated parameters because users can't find them in the irregular order.

1299:

etc. I was finding that some authors were actually the publishers and some were just wrong like "MLS Staff".

544: 4332: 4313: 4228: 4223:

Please explain why you think that is a *better* (not just an alternative) solution than using a redirect. —

4179: 3961: 3942: 3918: 3870: 3318: 3259: 2996: 2680: 2639: 2551: 2492: 2437: 2277: 2236: 2188: 2177: 2133: 1942: 1822: 1153: 1076: 1040: 992: 813: 754: 699: 644: 540: 501: 4277: 4088: 3971: 3783: 3716: 3696: 3558: 3498: 3160: 2892: 2828: 2750: 2708: 1799: 1575: 1494: 1423: 1410: 1387: 1372: 1342: 1316: 1300: 1256: 1059: 1012: 956: 916: 614: 572: 522: 450: 348: 51: 17: 2905: 2876: 2860: 2599: 2540: 2481: 2087:

A way to introduce Recent Changes patrol to new users to make using RedWarn or other tools less daunting?

1804:

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from

4121: 4113: 4078: 3834: 3416: 3395: 3141: 2358: 2001: 1990: 1928: 1830: 1704: 1592:

Hey! Thanks for testing RedWarn. This is an important message to notify you that effective immediately,

857: 852: 798: 793: 739: 734: 688: 3847:

I don't see that either of those apply (although of course, Capitol Hill is now the location for CHOP).

3240: 2042:

I hate to reitterate, but thank you so much for being willing to test RedWarn, I really appreciate it.

1456:

https://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2018/06/25/kc-firm-will-design-nashville-s-mls-stadium.html

4238: 3407:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3153:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2370:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4298: 4255: 4208: 4158: 4135: 4060: 4045: 4032: 3938: 3204: 2943: 2651: 2647: 1707:, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews 1530: 417: 367: 306: 2595: 2590: 2536: 2531: 2477: 2472: 4242: 4019: 4015: 4011: 4001: 3673: 3366: 3307: 3236: 3165: 3148: 3040: 2803: 1953: 1946: 1920: 1772: 877: 655: 648: 473: 440: 410:. It was nominated for deletion pretty quickly, so would you mind weighing in on the discussion? 3848: 3801: 3769: 3755: 4321: 4224: 4194: 4175: 3098: 2773: 2731: 2688: 2663: 2643: 2274: 2232: 2227: 2173: 2168: 1818: 1482: 1466: 1396: 1357: 1329: 1149: 1072: 1049: 1036: 1002: 988: 885: 606: 512: 496: 394: 334: 1553: 1534: 4380: 4272: 4083: 4077:. Do not escalate this into an edit war. It would be best to use a redirect of any kind (e.g. 3966: 3914: 3852: 3805: 3778: 3759: 3740: 3711: 3706: 3692: 3598: 3553: 3544: 3493: 3455: 2985: 2887: 2882: 2839: 2823: 2763: 2745: 2721: 2703: 2674: 2576: 2521: 2417: 2325: 1888: 1814: 1761: 1730: 1691: 1570: 1489: 1405: 1337: 1277: 1251: 1223: 1195: 1054: 1007: 969: 951: 911: 838: 783: 633: 588: 567: 552: 517: 445: 343: 43: 4267: 4200: 4186: 3991: 3830: 3826: 2624: 2117: 1986: 1981: 1924: 1826: 1675: 1651: 684: 679: 295: 4325: 4301: 4295: 4283: 4263: 4258: 4252: 4232: 4218: 4211: 4205: 4183: 4171: 4161: 4155: 4138: 4132: 4094: 4070: 4063: 4057: 4048: 4042: 4035: 4029: 3977: 3954: 3889: 3856: 3842: 3809: 3789: 3773: 3763: 3744: 3722: 3700: 3680: 3624: 3582: 3564: 3532: 3504: 3478: 3459: 3370: 3311: 3249: 3208: 3200: 3116: 3044: 3015: 2989: 2947: 2939: 2913: 2898: 2868: 2834: 2807: 2777: 2756: 2735: 2714: 2692: 2667: 2628: 2603: 2544: 2485: 2456: 2421: 2379: 2332: 2290: 2240: 2181: 2152: 2121: 2015: 1994: 1932: 1892: 1846: 1834: 1680: 1655: 1581: 1565: 1546: 1538: 1500: 1474: 1431: 1416: 1380: 1348: 1308: 1262: 1235: 1199: 1157: 1137: 1133: 1080: 1065: 1044: 1018: 996: 962: 922: 889: 865: 806: 747: 718: 692: 663: 637: 592: 578: 556: 528: 506: 481: 456: 430: 423: 412: 398: 373: 362: 354: 320: 312: 301: 4112:

was never raised in connection with redirect to specific sections within those articles.

1646:

Again, thank you so much for being willing to beta test RedWarn! I really appreciate it.

4357: 3776:. If you want to have links in the caption, make sure to link all of the neighborhoods. 3284: 2517: 1906: 779: 4149: 4145: 4127: 4117: 3667: 3362: 3357: 3303: 3298: 3222: 3036: 3031: 2816:, awards should only be included if they are the top award offered by the organization 2813: 2799: 943: 906: 3425:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 3175:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2388:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 4317: 4109: 4074: 4054: 3649: 2769: 2740: 2727: 2698: 2684: 2659: 2262: 1767: 1739: 1561: 1291:. The tool I use to update the formatting, also corrects some other formatting (like 897: 881: 492: 390: 3083:

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all

1798:(remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on 1564:

guidelines. Please use the article talk pages to bring up suggestions and following

4376: 4371: 4367: 3910: 3905: 3901: 3885: 3736: 3451: 3353: 3338: 3294: 3027: 3011: 2981: 2977: 2615: 2586: 2571: 2562: 2555: 2527: 2503: 2496: 2468: 2452: 2448: 2441: 2413: 2374: 2365: 2223: 2208: 2164: 2148: 1977: 1962: 1884: 1880: 1810: 1750: 1717: 1243: 1215: 1191: 1187: 1110: 1071:

substituting existing material with material you had complied in your draft-space.

848: 833: 824: 817: 789: 765: 758: 730: 714: 710: 703: 675: 659: 629: 625: 584: 562: 548: 3432: 3182: 2395: 2304: 443:. It doesn't seem to meet the notability criteria in its current state, however. 3382: 3128: 2962: 2620: 2345: 2127:

If you do not wish to get these feedback reminders, let me know on my talk page.

2113: 2023: 1647: 50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3933: 2314: 2081:

Something you've always wanted to see in an anti-vandal tool? (I might add it!)

1643:. It's easy to sign up and you can get help and chat with other RedWarn users. 4105: 1172: 1129: 4245:

and not likely be much longer at all and thus might become a candidate for a

1865: 1745: 1636:. By reporting bugs, you can help get them fixed by the next daily release. 610: 1802:, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! 905:

add external links to city articles until you have read and understood the

3880: