1305:
from your comments. It shows a respect for other people and an inquiring mind. I also suspect I detect an enthusiastic wonder at the marvels of the world, and a passion to extend the bounds of human knowledge, both by discovery and by sharing those discoveries. I wish I could offer to work more closely with you, but I really must apply my time elsewhere just now. Do feel free to alert me if you think I can be of further service. Forgive me if I'm slow to respond. I hope to be checking back on this article from time to time, whether invited or not! ;) Bravo Sparky! Wiki's a great project to participate in, isn't it? :)
1379:
595:
577:
613:
559:
541:
1222:
by my expertise in the subject, not by any failing in the text I'm reading. When I read an academic journal article outside my field of study, I can sometimes feel exactly the same thing -- the article goes on and on about things that seem to be details and irrelevant to me. In this case it is my ignorance, not the text that gives me the impression of lack of conciseness (concision?).
1576:
1466:
1270:
to actually do the writing. The printing press allowed less energy to be expended for higher output. The industrial revolution automated even more of the printing process, but started using energy sources other than physical human labour. Twenty first century technology allows text to be produced and distributed electronically. It is a tiny fraction of what is known as the
1048:
1769:
1746:
1682:
1269:
For example, I don't think it would hurt to explain that "Many features considered to be distinctive of civilization require energy. For example, even as far back as the invention of writing, workers needed to spend time producing materials to be used in the production of documents, and others needed
1247:
A good backgammon article will have a logical structure like: history, equipment, rules, tournaments, money games, strategy, famous players, literature. Experts will not read the equipment and rules sections. Novices need to read the rules before they read about strategy. Strategy is so complex, only
180:
entry has gone through some major reverts, I'd like to talk about the reinstatement of the material. I've looked around and have seen that you've made some major contributions to the article and are interested in it's progress. I feel we need to talk about the reverts and reinstatement and talk about
1277:
The kind of text I'm proposing is obviously for novices. I think many would actually appreciate having it spelled out for them (also, children read and learn from Wiki). Experts (and adults) know how to skim and will correctly see where all this text is going, just from the first sentence. They will
1251:
I don't know enough about literature that interacts with
Kardashev to know where to draw the lines in that article. I tried to suggest broad ways of thinking about the article to help editors like yourself work towards being comfortable with a text that has a high level of logical structure, working
1221:
Re being concise. Here are some further reflections from me on the topic. "Concise" can be used subjectively and objectively. When I read a book that aims to explain a technical subject to a popular audience, it can feel drawn-out and long winded. That's my personal, subjective impression, explained
1524:
deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with
Knowledge's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that
1304:
Sparky, you are doing great work. I am learning to write for other people, and it is a challenging service to learn. People are so diverse and not uniformly appreciative. Your feedback on my feedback shows two qualities I value highly in people. You treat what I offer with a thoughtfulness evident
1243:
I guess I've not been very concise here! ;) All I'm saying is that all readers are different, they have different knowledge and different interests. You can't please all the people, all the time! However, novices do not read footnotes, so put text they don't need out of the way in footnotes (there
215:
Wow, great edits, totally approved of revisions as of 21:49, 31 December 2007. Especially the
Retitle section: Classifying fictional civilizations, it always bothered me cause the books describe advanced civilizations, but don't use the Kardashev scale to describe them. It's like the viewpoint was
1285:
is technically a term describing density of information. It is not always a good thing. Who reads the phone book cover to cover? In practice, people complain that something is "not concise", when it includes asides they consider irrelevant to their questions. This problem can often be bypassed by
1225:
A reader will describe text as tangential, meandering and not concise when there is substantial text that does not address the reader's questions. This can be an objective fact. Authors often include asides that are not really necessary to progressing a point they're making. Sometimes, however,
1615:
The 2010 Winter
Olympics Gold Medal game doesn't start for another 8 hours, but you've already input the scores, and declared the USA as having won gold. While the USA did win a preliminary game against Canada last week with the score given, that was not the Gold medal game. As the article is
992:
Dyson weaves together all of this and more, skillfully but sketchily. Exclusive of the front matter, notes, and index, the book is only 228 pages. There are many parts I can't summarize without trivializing them. I don't know if the book has an identifiable thesis, but a central idea is this:
708:
The nuclear section was long ago merged into the energy development article. The rest of the article has been replaced with a redirect. The nuclear power article uses the word future 8 or 9 times, but
Knowledge is not a crystal ball and editors are cautioned not to speculate about the future.
1677:" (excuse the comparision) to find willing editors to work on it. It is much more easier to repair references if you do it one hour, one day or one week ago after the errors were made instead of months and years after the error was done. Very, very difficult to find these errors.
629:
Hi
Sparkgravity. I don't have time to do a full review now. My immediate comment: take the details of the three types out of the lead and move them to a full section immediately after the lead. It's too much detail. Summarize the types in a couple of sentences instead in the lead.
1286:
using predictable logical development, or by using footnotes and parentheses. There are other strategies too. The article makes good use of bullet points and diagrams, these suggest a lot of information implicitly, without the reader expending much effort to interpret them.
999:
This is a deep book. There is not much point to reading it unless you want to think about the issues it raises. Most of us are usually too busy to do that. If you have a little free time this summer, reading and thinking about this book might be a good way to spend
251:
Hi, Sparkygravity, and a Happy New Year! Unfortunately I don't have the "World Energy
Outlook" book at home, so can't help with this right now. The IEA makes its publications free of charge available after two years, so the latest you could find in the web is
764:
page! However I removed the link of it under 'completed goals' in the wikiproject missing articles. The pages get added to that list once all the articles are completed (redirected/made/removed etc). But feel free once you have worked on the entire page
1125:
Following discussion with the blocking admin I have upped the block to 3 months. Permanent bans are not done implemented for IPs since the IP address may be reallocated but hopefully this longer period may mean he gets bored and finds another hobby.
99:
hmm, that sucks. I think the page doesn't really have a lot of people adding solid evidence of research, and that's why so much of the content has been removed. I really believe the studies are out there but I need help in looking for all of
1526:
1265:
The vocabulary and grammar of the
Kardashev article flow very well. There is a clear logic in the table of contents. However, I guess we could work out a series of questions that are answered step by step and improve it further.
996:"In the game of life and evolution there are three players at the table: human beings, nature, and machines. I am firmly on the side of nature. But nature, I suspect, is on the side of the machines."
1480:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
683:
Sorry, I missed your comment to me on the 28th. Basically, I'm saying take the three bullets out of the lead and leave a shorter summary instead. Create a new section immediately below and move the bullets there.
1244:
are other strategies). Experts will criticise oversimplified text, raising all sorts of wierd and wonderful exceptions. By footnoting such things, experts are satisfied that accuracy and precision are satisfied.
1868:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
67:
For the citation needed for calculated power output of Types 0-III, I've had a couple of people swear to me that the articles exist but I haven't had time to google them. Do you know anyone who would want to do
1226:
assides are there to assist novices to "stay on board" with the flow, or to provide experts with additional information. I tend to put the first in parentheses in the body of text and the second in footnotes.
766:
761:
901:. It's all you, and you might be interested in developing the article further (a second source would be nice.) I realized afterwards that I probably should have run this by you before I went ahead and
1262:
readers want. Personally, I kind of enjoy the challenge of producing text that will not suit everyone perfectly, but accomodates the widest possible range of people with a high degree of comfort.
1585:. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles from deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Knowledge. You can join
740:
and commentary in it about possible future energy sources (ranging into the realm of speculations about star trek 'technologies') which i and others culled from it some time back.
661:
I've changed it all to megatons; that way the paragraph isn't cluttered by exponents, and the power usage of the hypothetical Type I civilization is just a simple unit conversion.
724:
the article has been tagged for merge for quite a long time. ostensibly all the appropriate info was moved into the energy development article. 199.125.109.64 is confused about
83:
Not in particular. If I don't have a source myself, I usually just leave the "citation needed" tags until someone who cares comes across them, or the material gets removed. --
644:
On your suggestion of trimming the antimatter section, I think it's a good idea. There's way too much detail there now, even after I moved the Tsar Bomba stuff to the intro.
1914:
134:
Well unfortunately it's not in one place, but supposedly
Kardashev did the power modeling himself, so if you could find that journal article it could be used.--
1735:
1656:
1758:
1660:
1781:
1664:
1645:
905:
carried this out, but I think you agree that this subject is interesting and important enough to deserve its own article. I'm also working on shortening
31:. The article is just fine without long paragraphs of whole-cloth discussion of one person's ideas. Please don't add back the material unless you have
948:
Duh, I believe
Charles cut-and-pasted material that I had added to AI, but no matter. I like the new page and have added to it a quote from a review of
1586:
917:
of 10 printed pages (not counting footnotes, references, ex. links, etc.) This means a few things have to be cut and branched into new articles. ----
1239:
A player will "double" when she thinks a win is sufficiently likely. Footnote: 75% in money games, but higher or lower than this in tournament play.
1913:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
1413:
1202:
431:
Anyway, I didn't rolled back your notices, and I hope one or more of these users will get back to you with the 3rd part feedback you need :)
1893:
710:
1652:
1166:
I'm not that familiar with science so you might want a different user for that and I must say that your work on that article is great -
1071:
333:
Hi, how do I go to the Talk archive for the page... not the peer review archive, but the stuff you archived. Can we provide a link on
1636:
464:
user on the list"? I'm afraid I don't have time to help just now, but hopefully one of the others you've asked will be of service. â
1582:
960:
1278:
skip (fast-forward) to the next para. They will like the text, because its logic allows them to read (including skimming) easily.
949:
411:
1889:
1248:
the main principles can be explained, exceptions and detailed explanations really need to be consigned to links or references.
1192:
Hello, Sparkygravity. I noticed that you put a tag saying you wished to be adopted. Would it be all right for me to adopt you?
1218:
Thanks for taking my suggestions re Kardashev seriously, of course they are only suggestions and rather general in some ways.
788:
Not only did I fix your RFC, I fixed everyone else's! See, the bot mysteriously dropped offline. I propped it back to life.
1489:
1880:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1885:
1632:
1557:
1359:
1337:
1258:
Guessing what readers want to know is not an exact science, and feedback, even broad feedback will only tell you what
1052:
1031:
937:
922:
840:
832:
982:
1917:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
1549:
816:
797:
1310:
1294:
1023:
893:
885:
404:
Sorry, it seems that something is missing from my previous sentence and changed its meaning. I did not meant say
714:
1534:
1484:, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
1200:
1119:
1083:
666:
649:
1026:-- not you, Sparkygravity. So much for doing accurate research (ha). That's embarassing. Sorry guys. ----
1817:
1553:
1392:
1027:
933:
918:
836:
812:
793:
114:
I can help if you give me all the information in one place to look at. The talk page is pretty jumbled. â
40:
28:
1516:
1351:
1348:
1329:
1326:
1255:
When I don't read the bits I'm not interested in, I am much less likely to feel things are not concise.
1131:
1069:
Your tribute to the Ramones does not belong on that talk page. Put it on one of your userspaces instead.
745:
1922:
1918:
1628:
1620:
1485:
1401:
1306:
1290:
874:
334:
327:
182:
1510:
1473:
1459:
1881:
1417:
1056:
162:
119:
54:
32:
1378:
1530:
1429:
1193:
1102:
1094:
1076:
1008:
972:
855:
689:
662:
645:
635:
508:
447:
367:
338:
276:
257:
217:
186:
135:
101:
69:
1624:
1495:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
216:
backwards, writers use science to describe science fiction... not sci-fi to describe science.--
1857:
1848:
1064:
957:
808:
789:
725:
471:
154:
150:
36:
1581:
Hello, Sparkygravity. Based on the templates on your talk page, please consider joining the
1877:
1861:
1821:
1233:
Backgammon is played with board, chequers and dice, which are normally thrown from shakers.
1127:
914:
774:
741:
357:
312:
294:
265:
236:
205:
88:
1876:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1829:
1500:
870:
529:
256:. Concerning converting different energy units, I would suggest to look IEA's publication
253:
177:
17:
807:
You know, it just might have done that. It kept talking all about this "President Gore".
1397:
1873:
1865:
1706:
1597:
1575:
1060:
1018:
I just realized (a month later) that I had confused you two. I orginally meant to tell
902:
897:, using your (well written, well researched and interesting) material that appeared in
736:
are enjoined from speculating. the future energy development article did have a lot of
388:
Please do not ask any user to peer review. One is enough. Thank you and happy editing,
158:
115:
50:
1869:
1514:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
1481:
1477:
1409:
1168:
1147:
1004:
968:
906:
898:
685:
631:
1910:
1904:
1825:
737:
612:
558:
540:
523:
486:
465:
434:
419:
416:. I did spotted your notices as they repeatedly come up while vandal patrolling :)
391:
24:
1236:
A "doubling" cube can also be used (the six faces marked 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64).
594:
576:
1668:
1476:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under
770:
353:
308:
290:
261:
232:
201:
84:
1465:
1390:
Salutations, Sparkygravity. I've noticed your interest in articles relating to
460:
I think perhaps the first sentence there should be "do no request reviews from
49:
Hey Sparkygravity, I'll take a look in an hour or so. Thanks for the alert. â
1926:
1897:
1842:
1837:
1803:
1798:
1699:
1694:
1674:
1601:
1593:
1561:
1538:
1422:
1363:
1341:
1314:
1298:
1205:
1181:
1160:
1135:
1110:
1085:
1051:
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge, as you did to
1035:
1012:
976:
941:
926:
878:
863:
844:
820:
801:
778:
749:
732:
speculate about future events, there's absolutely no preclusion to them. WP
718:
693:
670:
653:
639:
516:
493:
478:
455:
441:
426:
398:
375:
361:
346:
316:
298:
284:
269:
240:
225:
209:
194:
165:
143:
122:
109:
92:
77:
57:
44:
260:. At the page 58 it has rules how to convert energy units (including Btu).
304:
185:
If you could help or add your two cents I'd really appreciate it. Thanks--
1405:
352:
Oops, I forgot to add a link at the top of the talk page. Fixed now. --
1047:
275:
So basically the "World Energy Outlook 2005" is under GFDL copyrights?--
1610:
1651:
Hello - some editors fight off the vandal hordes, as I do repairing
1252:
like an index so readers can skim it for the information they want.
1145:
I saw on your userpage about adoption do you want to be adoopted? -
303:
Copyright terms for the free of charge information from the IEA are
1673:). But it is impossible to work it alone. Do you know how to do a "
1611:
Please don't edit Hockey scores for games that haven't happened yet
981:
PS. O! Boy, did I ever find a much better review of Dyson! It's an
1864:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
854:
This page background Rocks BTW, makes me want to steal the idea--
1325:
I'd be happy to adopt you! Let me know if your interested. -
954:
Darwin Among the Machines: The Evolution of Global Intelligence
767:
Knowledge:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Most wanted
762:
Knowledge:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Most wanted
1396:
and would like to invite you to join the freshly resuscitated
760:
I just want to say good job on that article you made from the
1520:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
1486:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
1464:
247:
RE:Future Energy Worldwide energy consumption and production
1404:
devoted to improving articles related to the philosophy of
910:
1373:
769:
to then add it back to the completed goal list ;). Cheers!
526:
since I hate going to his page each time I want to use it.
35:
for putting it back (which you will most likely not get).
1790:
Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character ",".
1408:. If you're interested, consider adding yourself to the
1715:
1687:
1444:
1437:
932:
Funny, about Kellogg. There's no hurry on Butler. ----
1567:
You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron
1655:. If I didn't - there would be a large backlog in
1616:semi-protected, I'm unable to fix your mistakes.
1215:Short answer: short logical steps = not rambling.
1063:. If you would like to experiment, please use the
483:Yeah, every. Even the correction wasn't ok :( ;-)
1856:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
1525:if the article does get deleted, you can contact
1347:Have you decided if you want me to adopt you? -
869:Go ahead. I âstoleâ it from someone else. ;) --
1478:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion
1511:the page that has been nominated for deletion
8:
1657:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting
1529:to request that a copy be emailed to you.
1661:Category:Pages with missing references list
967:; Categories; and links to other articles.
604:
586:
568:
550:
532:
200:I've left my thoughts on the talk page. --
1665:Category:Pages with broken reference names
1646:Category:Pages with broken reference names
289:I don't think it's under GFDL copyrights.
1711:
831:I've responded to your message, back on
1716:
1832:do. I beg politely for consideration.
1416:. Yours in enlightened self-interest,
149:You can also try the people listed at
7:
1789:
1490:notability guideline for biographies
1834:Please leave a comment if you wish.
1737:Pages with incorrect ref formatting
552:{{Subst:User:Fir0002/Weak Support}}
1760:Pages with missing references list
1686:it is possible to find and repair
1488:, as well as our subject-specific
1412:and joining the discussion on the
1055:. Your edits appear to constitute
570:{{Subst:User:Fir0002/Weak Oppose}}
14:
1882:review the candidates' statements
1783:Pages with broken reference names
1101:discussion page for details.Thx--
507:We all fumble from time to time--
1836:Thanks a lot in anticipation. --
1767:
1744:
1574:
1570:
1377:
1046:
611:
593:
575:
557:
539:
412:Knowledge:Peer review/volunteers
258:Key World Energy Statistics 2007
609:
591:
573:
555:
537:
1903:Good article reassessment for
1888:. For the Election committee,
1858:Arbitration Committee election
1849:ArbCom elections are now open!
1281:There we go, that's my point,
606:{{Subst:User:Fir0002/Neutral}}
534:{{Subst:User:Fir0002/Support}}
181:whether either are justified.
1:
1927:23:29, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
1898:13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1637:12:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
1602:15:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
1211:Speculations on writing style
1182:15:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
1161:19:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
1136:00:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
1111:23:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
1086:16:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
942:05:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
927:00:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
879:17:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
864:16:52, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
845:18:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
821:01:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
802:23:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
588:{{Subst:User:Fir0002/Oppose}}
241:22:48, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
226:21:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
210:22:48, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
195:02:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
166:21:50, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
144:21:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
123:21:42, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
110:21:24, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
93:21:21, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
78:21:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
58:09:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
45:18:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
1843:03:57, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
1804:03:57, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
1700:09:08, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
1482:criteria for speedy deletion
779:16:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
750:23:33, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
719:01:28, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
694:13:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
671:08:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
654:07:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
640:18:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
517:14:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
494:14:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
479:19:26, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
456:19:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
442:19:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
427:19:13, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
399:18:46, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
1884:and submit your choices on
1693:Best wishes & thanks --
1053:Knowledge talk:Adopt-a-User
833:User talk:CharlesGillingham
376:14:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
362:18:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
347:15:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
317:14:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
299:14:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
285:11:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
270:07:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
254:"World Energy Outlook 2005"
1942:
1890:MediaWiki message delivery
1705:Backlog template made by
1653:pages with citation errors
1580:
1427:
1364:21:16, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
1315:11:24, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1299:02:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1274:of contemporary society."
1206:23:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
1036:21:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
983:interesting-people message
1816:There is a suggestion on
1562:05:32, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
1472:A tag has been placed on
1423:00:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
1342:16:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
1024:Darwin Among the Machines
1013:15:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
977:14:10, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
894:Darwin Among the Machines
886:Darwin Among the Machines
63:Kardashev Scale citations
1670:more than 1500 yesterday
1539:14:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
1106:
891:I created an article on
512:
451:
371:
280:
139:
105:
1583:Article Rescue Squadron
1398:WikiProject Objectivism
1386:WikiProject Objectivism
1120:User talk:82.47.141.134
1818:Knowledge:Bot requests
1469:
1002:
29:Knowledge:Undue Weight
1862:Arbitration Committee
1644:BACKLOG OF THE WEEK
1468:
990:
522:stealling table from
153:or ask a question at
1410:list of participants
850:Talk page background
817:write these articles
798:write these articles
366:Good deal! Thanks.--
335:Talk:Kardashev scale
328:Talk:Kardashev scale
183:Talk:Kardashev scale
1866:arbitration process
1722:
1527:one of these admins
1458:Speedy deletion of
1022:that I had created
1878:arbitration policy
1791:
1712:
1470:
1198:
1099:
1081:
1915:reassessment page
1795:
1794:
1640:
1623:comment added by
1608:
1607:
1554:Sarcasticidealist
1455:
1454:
1362:
1340:
1194:
1095:
1077:
1028:CharlesGillingham
934:CharlesGillingham
919:CharlesGillingham
837:CharlesGillingham
622:
621:
475:
446:Cool, cool, thx--
176:Hi, recently the
1933:
1786:
1784:
1775:
1771:
1770:
1763:
1761:
1752:
1748:
1747:
1740:
1738:
1723:
1720:
1718:
1713:Backlog status (
1683:WikiBlame Search
1639:
1617:
1578:
1571:
1506:
1505:
1499:
1447:
1440:
1420:
1381:
1374:
1358:
1356:
1336:
1334:
1197:
1180:
1178:
1173:
1159:
1157:
1152:
1098:
1080:
1050:
730:reliable sources
615:
597:
579:
561:
543:
530:
489:
476:
473:
468:
437:
422:
394:
25:reliable sources
1941:
1940:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1908:
1886:the voting page
1852:
1814:
1782:
1780:
1768:
1766:
1759:
1757:
1745:
1743:
1736:
1734:
1729:Current status
1714:
1710:
1649:
1618:
1613:
1569:
1546:
1503:
1497:
1496:
1463:
1451:
1450:
1443:
1436:
1432:
1418:
1388:
1372:
1352:
1330:
1323:
1307:Alastair Haines
1291:Alastair Haines
1213:
1195:
1190:
1174:
1169:
1167:
1153:
1148:
1146:
1143:
1123:
1096:
1078:
1074:
1044:
950:George B. Dyson
889:
852:
829:
786:
758:
706:
627:
625:Kardashev again
528:
487:
472:
466:
435:
420:
392:
386:
331:
249:
178:Kardashev scale
174:
172:Kardashev Scale
65:
21:
18:Kardashev scale
12:
11:
5:
1939:
1937:
1907:
1901:
1855:
1851:
1846:
1840:
1813:
1807:
1801:
1797:Best wishes --
1793:
1792:
1787:
1777:
1776:
1764:
1754:
1753:
1741:
1731:
1730:
1727:
1709:
1707:User:TheJJJunk
1703:
1697:
1648:
1642:
1612:
1609:
1606:
1605:
1579:
1568:
1565:
1545:
1542:
1474:Davide Marocco
1462:
1460:Davide Marocco
1456:
1453:
1452:
1449:
1448:
1441:
1433:
1428:
1425:
1389:
1384:
1382:
1371:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1322:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1241:
1240:
1237:
1234:
1212:
1209:
1189:
1188:Adoption by me
1186:
1185:
1184:
1142:
1139:
1122:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1097:STYROFOAMâ1994
1079:STYROFOAMâ1994
1072:
1059:and have been
1043:
1040:
1039:
1038:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:and concludes:
945:
944:
915:correct length
888:
883:
882:
881:
851:
848:
828:
825:
824:
823:
785:
782:
757:
754:
753:
752:
711:199.125.109.64
705:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
676:
675:
674:
673:
626:
623:
620:
619:
608:
607:
602:
601:
590:
589:
584:
583:
572:
571:
566:
565:
554:
553:
548:
547:
536:
535:
527:
520:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
385:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
330:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
248:
245:
244:
243:
231:Thanks. 8) --
213:
212:
173:
170:
169:
168:
132:
131:
130:
129:
128:
127:
126:
125:
64:
61:
23:Please review
20:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1938:
1929:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1906:
1902:
1900:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1844:
1841:
1838:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1812:
1808:
1806:
1805:
1802:
1799:
1788:
1785:
1779:
1778:
1774:
1765:
1762:
1756:
1755:
1751:
1742:
1739:
1733:
1732:
1728:
1725:
1724:
1719:
1708:
1704:
1702:
1701:
1698:
1695:
1691:
1689:
1685:
1684:
1678:
1676:
1672:
1671:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1647:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1604:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1590:
1589:here <<
1584:
1577:
1573:
1572:
1566:
1564:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1543:
1541:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1531:Jiuguang Wang
1528:
1523:
1519:
1518:
1517:the talk page
1513:
1512:
1502:
1493:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1467:
1461:
1457:
1446:
1442:
1439:
1435:
1434:
1431:
1426:
1424:
1421:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1400:, a group of
1399:
1395:
1394:
1387:
1383:
1380:
1376:
1375:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1360:(and friends)
1357:
1355:
1350:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1338:(and friends)
1335:
1333:
1328:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1287:
1284:
1279:
1275:
1273:
1272:energy budget
1267:
1263:
1261:
1256:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1238:
1235:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1216:
1210:
1208:
1207:
1204:
1201:
1199:
1196:STYROFOAM1994
1187:
1183:
1179:
1177:
1172:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1156:
1151:
1140:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1121:
1118:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1103:Sparkygravity
1100:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1084:
1082:
1075:
1070:
1067:. Thank you.
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1049:
1042:February 2008
1041:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1001:
997:
994:
984:
980:
979:
978:
974:
970:
966:
962:
961:0-7382-0030-1
959:
955:
951:
947:
946:
943:
939:
935:
931:
930:
929:
928:
924:
920:
916:
912:
908:
907:History of AI
904:
900:
899:History of AI
896:
895:
887:
884:
880:
876:
872:
868:
867:
866:
865:
861:
857:
856:Sparkygravity
849:
847:
846:
842:
838:
834:
826:
822:
818:
814:
810:
806:
805:
804:
803:
799:
795:
791:
783:
781:
780:
776:
772:
768:
763:
755:
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
722:
721:
720:
716:
712:
704:Future energy
703:
695:
691:
687:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
672:
668:
664:
663:Ben Standeven
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
651:
647:
646:Ben Standeven
642:
641:
637:
633:
624:
618:
614:
605:
603:
600:
596:
587:
585:
582:
578:
569:
567:
564:
560:
551:
549:
546:
542:
533:
531:
525:
521:
519:
518:
514:
510:
509:Sparkygravity
495:
492:
491:
490:
482:
481:
480:
477:
469:
463:
459:
458:
457:
453:
449:
448:Sparkygravity
445:
444:
443:
440:
439:
438:
430:
429:
428:
425:
424:
423:
415:
413:
410:"any user in
407:
403:
402:
401:
400:
397:
396:
395:
383:
377:
373:
369:
368:Sparkygravity
365:
364:
363:
359:
355:
351:
350:
349:
348:
344:
340:
339:Sparkygravity
336:
329:
326:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
301:
300:
296:
292:
288:
287:
286:
282:
278:
277:Sparkygravity
274:
273:
272:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
229:
228:
227:
223:
219:
218:Sparkygravity
211:
207:
203:
199:
198:
197:
196:
192:
188:
187:Sparkygravity
184:
179:
171:
167:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
147:
146:
145:
141:
137:
136:Sparkygravity
124:
121:
117:
113:
112:
111:
107:
103:
102:Sparkygravity
98:
97:
96:
95:
94:
90:
86:
82:
81:
80:
79:
75:
71:
70:Sparkygravity
62:
60:
59:
56:
52:
47:
46:
42:
38:
34:
30:
26:
19:
16:
1911:Dyson sphere
1909:
1905:Dyson sphere
1853:
1833:
1815:
1810:
1796:
1772:
1749:
1692:
1681:
1679:
1669:
1650:
1614:
1592:
1547:
1521:
1515:
1508:
1494:
1471:
1391:
1385:
1353:
1331:
1324:
1288:
1282:
1280:
1276:
1271:
1268:
1264:
1259:
1257:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1217:
1214:
1191:
1175:
1170:
1154:
1149:
1144:
1124:
1068:
1045:
1019:
1003:
998:
995:
991:
964:
953:
913:down to the
892:
890:
859:
853:
830:
809:MessedRocker
790:MessedRocker
787:
759:
733:
729:
707:
643:
628:
616:
598:
580:
563:Weak Support
562:
544:
524:user:Fir0002
506:
485:
484:
461:
433:
432:
418:
417:
409:
405:
390:
389:
387:
342:
332:
250:
221:
214:
190:
175:
133:
73:
66:
48:
37:Michaelbusch
22:
1824:working as
1688:such errors
1619:âPreceding
1509:the top of
1402:Wikipedians
1393:Objectivism
1321:Adopt offer
1128:TerriersFan
1093:Please see
581:Weak Oppose
384:Peer review
1919:TompaDompa
1874:topic bans
1830:BracketBot
1820:for a new
1680:Only with
1370:Invitation
1229:Examples:
1203:Review me!
871:Loremaster
742:Anastrophe
726:WP:CRYSTAL
406:"any user"
155:WP:REFDESK
151:WP:LIBRARY
1870:site bans
1726:Category
1548:Userfied
1430:Shortcuts
1419:Skomorokh
1057:vandalism
756:Good job!
159:Viriditas
116:Viriditas
51:Viriditas
33:consensus
1773:Not done
1750:Not done
1633:contribs
1621:unsigned
1414:talkpage
1406:Ayn Rand
1349:Diligent
1327:Diligent
1289:Cheers,
1141:Adoption
1073:contribs
1061:reverted
1020:Pawyilee
1005:Pawyilee
969:Pawyilee
965:See Also
686:Marskell
632:Marskell
1826:DPL bot
1659:and in
1544:Marocco
1445:WP:RAND
1354:Terrier
1332:Terrier
1283:concise
1065:sandbox
956:(1998)
835:. ----
827:From CG
784:RFC Bot
734:editors
617:Neutral
545:Support
488:Snowolf
467:Scartol
436:Snowolf
421:Snowolf
393:Snowolf
337:page?--
1860:. The
1822:REFBot
1811:REFBot
1663:as in
1522:speedy
1501:hangon
1438:WP:AYN
903:boldly
771:Calaka
599:Oppose
354:Beland
309:Beagel
291:Beagel
262:Beagel
233:Beland
202:Beland
85:Beland
1828:and
1717:Purge
1675:Blitz
1625:Mabbo
1588:: -->
1587:: -->
1260:those
1176:Naven
1155:Naven
738:WP:OR
728:. if
462:every
100:it.--
68:it?--
1923:talk
1894:talk
1839:Frze
1809:New
1800:Frze
1696:Frze
1629:talk
1598:talk
1594:Ikip
1558:talk
1550:here
1535:talk
1311:talk
1295:talk
1132:talk
1107:talk
1032:talk
1009:talk
973:talk
958:ISBN
938:talk
923:talk
909:and
875:talk
860:talk
841:talk
813:talk
794:talk
775:talk
746:talk
715:talk
690:talk
667:talk
650:talk
636:talk
513:talk
452:talk
408:but
372:talk
358:talk
343:talk
313:talk
305:here
295:talk
281:talk
266:talk
237:talk
222:talk
206:talk
191:talk
163:Talk
140:talk
120:Talk
106:talk
89:talk
74:talk
55:Talk
41:talk
27:and
1854:Hi,
1507:to
1492:.
1000:it.
952:'s
815:) (
796:) (
474:Tok
157:. â
1925:)
1896:)
1872:,
1721:)
1690:.
1635:)
1631:â˘
1600:)
1591:.
1560:)
1552:.
1537:)
1504:}}
1498:{{
1313:)
1297:)
1171:J.
1150:J.
1134:)
1109:)
1034:)
1011:)
975:)
963:;
940:)
925:)
911:AI
877:)
862:)
843:)
819:)
800:)
777:)
748:)
717:)
692:)
669:)
652:)
638:)
610:=
592:=
574:=
556:=
538:=
515:)
470:â˘
454:)
374:)
360:)
345:)
315:)
307:.
297:)
283:)
268:)
239:)
224:)
208:)
193:)
161:|
142:)
118:|
108:)
91:)
76:)
53:|
43:)
1921:(
1892:(
1667:(
1627:(
1596:(
1556:(
1533:(
1309:(
1293:(
1130:(
1105:(
1030:(
1007:(
971:(
936:(
921:(
873:(
858:(
839:(
811:(
792:(
773:(
744:(
713:(
688:(
665:(
648:(
634:(
511:(
450:(
414:"
370:(
356:(
341:(
311:(
293:(
279:(
264:(
235:(
220:(
204:(
189:(
138:(
104:(
87:(
72:(
39:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.