User talk:Stormchaser89

1016: 926: 838: 763: 671: 598: 462:

access to high quality sources, but I spend a good amount of time collecting journal articles and books from wherever I can, and it's satisfying to apply what I read and learn to our articles. For now my plan is to maintain course with what I've been doing and clarify and expand on things when I find room for improvement. Only ~800 earthquake articles; just a few weekend's worth of work, right?

208: 142: 450:

Agreed. Well in that case with the 8 or higher definition a lot of articles that are currently under the Category:Megathrust earthquakes will need to be removed then; note many articles with 7-7.9 quakes were already included before I even started adding additional ones, which is why I considered 7.0

306:

This format was not invented by me, the "December 2014 to January 2015" indicates how long the most recent eruption has lasted and the ongoing means it is or is possibly continuing. I get my information from the Global Volcanism Program's weekly reports and eruptive history. The eruption may be over

461:

Well, I am not sure that it's necessary to create a definition. Not a bad idea of course, and feel free to do that, but my approach for the last couple of years has been to just compare with what is written about these events with what our articles and categories are saying. I know not everyone has

431:

thrust earthquakes there. Great earthquakes are over M8. The Pangandaran event a touch smaller than that. If we have the megathrust category in the article we'd be contradicting ourselves. I don't want Knowledge editors to appear foolish, so we categorize the article by what its sources say, and I

360:

First of all, I'd like to say that I've been cleaning up after you (and will be) for some time. You've added this category without any consideration of what scientists are saying. So, I have two questions for you. What is your source? Have you read the article? Please do not continue to add that

683:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

476:

Well its not difficult to go through and weed out the ones that are less than 8, I can easily do that and put a definition in. I've seen some categories with definitions previously, and they are meant to clarify what should and should not be included. Good luck on the ~800 earthquakes.

775:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

397:

Well of course I read it. Look, we need to be careful what we say. What I mean by that is that we only say what reliable sources say, right? I think we're in agreement on that. And yes, the article does say that the event occurred on the Java segment of the Sunda Trench. OK great.

1040:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

610:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1044:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

451:

or greater as megathrust. Surprisingly someone put an article in that was a quake of less than 7 which would make me uncategorize it from the megathrust category. Perhaps a statement on the main category stating the definition should be included?

289:. It seems to me that it either ended and "(ongoing)" should be removed or there should be no ending date. Also, what is your source for this information? I ask because the article doesn't mention any activity after January 2013. Thanks, 422:

The record of historic seismicity along the Java segment indicates that within a period of about 300 years, no great interplate (megathrust) earthquakes have occurred that were similar to the 1833 and 1861 Sumatra

409:

The term megathrust does not have a widely accepted rigorous definition, but is used to refer to an extremely large thrust fault, typically formed at the plate interface along a subduction zone such as the Sunda

508:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 969: 881: 803: 711: 638: 953:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 865:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 787:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 695:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 622:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1036: 42: 38: 82:

Alessia did not dissipate. TCWC Perth is still monitoring the storm, so we can't assume that the storm has dissipated until it has been completely dropped from the bulletins. See this

939: 851: 436:

earthquake as great or "mega" if it is not over M8. Sorry for the quick reverts (I agree they're not a nice thing) but I work hard at making these articles agree with their sources.

418:. This is not a great (or "mega") earthquake. It's classified as a "very large" earthquake. Now let's compare that with what the source in the article says: (Irsyam et al. 2008) 105:

I notice that you are altering the "last eruption" dates on many mountain infoboxes. Could you kindly supply reliable sources for these changes, with inline citations? Thanks! —

378:, and I know from other sources including the USGS that this was considered a megathrust earthquake, maybe you need to look into things before automatically undoing edits. 307:

since there hasn't been any information on it since Janaury, but the Global Volcanism Program still suggests it may be still ongoing in the volcano's eruptive history.

427:

So they're saying no megathrust earthquake has occurred on the Java portion of the Sunda Trench in the last 300 years. They're saying this because there have been no

232: 1025: 562: 52: 558: 48: 991: 903: 817: 725: 652: 533: 741:

Shahab-3 and Rodong-1 are not Scud derivatives. Hwasong-9 can be considered as derivative but it is different than Rodong-1 missile. --

374:

I have to ask you the same question on if you've even read this article, it says in the intro it was a subduction zone quake on the

987: 899: 813: 721: 648: 529: 45:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 555:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 351:. Because of this it is considered a megathrust earthquake event and belongs in the Category:Megathrust earthquakes in Java. 30: 21:

Hey, Tongariro is currently erupting, the USGS (Smithsonian) confirmed it this week. Please correct the edition. Thanks!

1053: 962: 874: 796: 704: 631: 520:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

974: 886: 808: 716: 643: 525: 414:

OK, extremely large. The Sunda Megathrust certainly is that, right? But what about the size of the event itself? 7.7 M

91: 1029: 547:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

29:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

295: 165:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1049: 267: 950: 862: 784: 692: 619: 402: 340: 87: 432:

think we should apply the same standards across all our earthquake articles. We should not categorize

348: 192: 746: 521: 463: 437: 362: 326: 478: 452: 379: 352: 308: 291: 933: 845: 771: 679: 606: 588: 578: 497: 488: 263: 212: 125: 110: 68: 981: 946: 893: 858: 780: 688: 615: 517: 501: 237: 961:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 873:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 795:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 703:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 630:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 516:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 219:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

286: 188: 146: 958: 870: 792: 742: 700: 627: 513: 505: 255: 954: 866: 788: 696: 623: 569:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

509: 154: 83: 59:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1021: 1006: 574: 570: 224: 121: 106: 64: 60: 925: 837: 762: 670: 597: 548: 375: 344: 254:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

1057: 995: 907: 821: 750: 729: 656: 582: 537: 481: 470: 455: 444: 382: 369: 355: 333: 314: 300: 271: 196: 129: 114: 95: 72: 965:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

877:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

799:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

707:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

634:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

361:

category to articles without consulting reliable sources. Thanks again,

943:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

855:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

158: 120:

Yes, please do otherwise they are subject to being reverted. Thanks.

34: 401:

Now let's pause for a moment. Let's look at what our own article on

504:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

325:

Please stop blindly adding this category to articles. Thank you,

978:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 890:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 285:

what appears to be an ending date, while leaving "(ongoing)" to

968:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

880:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

802:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

710:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

637:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

1037:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ultima Tower (2nd nomination)

937:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

552: 347:

which is a subduction zone, this same fault produced the

849:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

1020:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

949: