Knowledge

User talk:Straxus

Source 📝

123:
require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
103:
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
39:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also
132: 47:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at 127:
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of
135:
will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
107:
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (
62: 40: 85: 36: 131:, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then 79: 95:
Thanks - it's intentionally like that, for a few complicated reasons. However, thanks for passing it along!
82: 48: 108: 44: 147: 55: 111:). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was 32: 66: 128: 143: 139: 25: 61:
template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to
81:
says "Presented by Billy Newport on Jan 19, 2010", which is... in the future.
115:. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to 138:
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of
99:
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
151: 90: 69: 65:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 35:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 8: 7: 75:You should fix a date on your site 14: 119:in the next few days. This does 63:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 41:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not 1: 91:15:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC) 70:02:39, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 167: 152:22:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 31:" template to the article 109:consensus discussion 51:. If you remove the 45:Knowledge:Notability 88: 49:Talk:Don Slobojan 37:proposed deletion 158: 118: 114: 86: 60: 54: 30: 24: 21:I've added the " 166: 165: 161: 160: 159: 157: 156: 155: 133:this discussion 116: 112: 101: 77: 58: 52: 28: 22: 19: 12: 11: 5: 164: 162: 140:User:Jarry1250 100: 97: 76: 73: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 163: 154: 153: 149: 145: 141: 136: 134: 130: 125: 122: 110: 105: 98: 96: 93: 92: 89: 84: 80: 74: 72: 71: 68: 64: 57: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 27: 16: 137: 126: 120: 106: 102: 94: 78: 67:Irongargoyle 33:Don Slobojan 20: 17:Don Slobojan 56:dated prod 144:LivingBot 129:WP:MINOR 117:false 148:talk 113:true 87:ping 83:Pcap 43:and 26:prod 121:not 150:) 142:, 59:}} 53:{{ 29:}} 23:{{ 146:(

Index

prod
Don Slobojan
proposed deletion
Knowledge:What Knowledge is not
Knowledge:Notability
Talk:Don Slobojan
dated prod
Knowledge:Articles for deletion
Irongargoyle
02:39, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Pcap
ping
15:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
consensus discussion
WP:MINOR
this discussion
User:Jarry1250
LivingBot
talk
22:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.