619:
isn't). Since I'm not in charge of the scientific consensus, they were barking at the wrong tree. I'm not a scientist; I have nothing to add to or subtract from mainstream science. I render it for what it is. So, even assuming I was prejudiced against their POV (since it does sounds like an outlier), there was no need of doctoring the medical consensus. They felt treated like outcasts, but even if I wished, I could not offer them a place at the table of mainstream science. There are many people who think they will change mainstream science through editing
Knowledge (XXG)—but that is a completely wrong approach: Knowledge (XXG) is subservient to mainstream science, mainstream science isn't subservient to Knowledge (XXG). What those people really asked is playing fast and loose with the facts of mainstream science. We cannot do that.
550:-compliant, they will likely stay, otherwise every experienced editor will have to revert you. By saying this I am not aggressive, I just tell it as it is. (Dutchies don't beat around the bush, but bluntly tell you what's wrong.) I'm blunt but not mean. I could appear mean, but in fact I am only defending the norms and values of this website. I am very harsh on bigots, but reasonable and conciliatory with reasonable people. With people which present themselves as reasonable, I am much more conciliatory than other experienced users. If I can reasonably give you the benefit of doubt, I will do it, otherwise I have a low tolerance for bullshit. I have only become an anti-bigotry vigilante because of the unending attacks of fundamentalists upon our
523:
that I like to see you blocked. I would like that you learn from your mistakes and become a productive editor. But if you are not up to the task, you will be blocked. I cannot ban you, in fact there is a single editor able to ban you from
Knowledge (XXG), that editor is you. The key point about getting to read about our rules is changing your behavior. We want you to behave according to the rules of our encyclopedia, if you cannot behave you will be blocked or banned. I will report you to admins if it is clear to me that you don't want to comply with
24:
952:, you refer to Chinese people in a very generalized way. I think it's a phrasing thing, as you and I both know exactly what you meant and that it's not against Knowledge (XXG) policy to disparage the Chinese suppression and censorship of scientific scholarship. Generalizations are often interpreted in overly broad ways, as the IP did. Let me know if they pester you at all again, as I would be more than glad to testify against any such claim. Best, ~
1069:
925:
871:
635:
contributions to
Knowledge (XXG) I could get the death penalty in several countries (e.g. in North Korea for liberal-bourgeois propaganda, in Iran and Saudi Arabia for blasphemy, sorcery and LGBT-friendly propaganda—what Knowledge (XXG) sees as mainstream science, they see as propaganda; in totalitarian countries ideology trumps reality).
1021:
Cool. Anyway, that was just some advice about how to reduce the abrasiveness of future comments. Things you say have proved inflammatory before despite you not intending them as such, so I figured I could offer a perspective on how to avoid that. If you get bothered again for your principled stand on
1130:
if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the
1079:
You are warned for talk page participation which is at times both excessively voluminous and excessively frequent, resulting in bludgeoning. In addition to any standard CTOP remedies, restrictions upon the frequency and/or length of your posts within the
Anthroposophy topic area or on any particular
634:
pseudoscience, extremism, fundamentalism or conspiracy theories, we're not interested in what you have to say. Imho, using
Knowledge (XXG) to promote pseudoscience is worse than using it to promote criminal behavior (seen that definitions of what is a crime largely depend upon the country). For my
522:
breakers repent from violating our rules and become instead productive editors. The decision to obey our rules is always personal, but it has enormous consequences for one's activity inside
Knowledge (XXG). I cannot decide for you, but I can tell you that it is wise to obey our rules. So, it's not
622:
Knowledge (XXG) has a purpose, it has norms and values; those who violate these get blocked or banned. I am prepared to explain you these norms and values, otherwise to those that do not heed these I believe that giving the cat enough rope it will hang itself. But we're not a clique: everyone who
579:
I don't hate editors as persons; I hate rule-breaking. I consider that any editor can change his/her mind/behavior at any moment. Few edit warriors do that, but that's another matter. As long as you know when to stop, you can get away with almost anything at
Knowledge (XXG). It's not the mistake
618:
I listened to critics of the article. I mean: I did not oblige their wish to adulterate the medical consensus, but I have provided rock-solid sources for the medical consensus. That had nothing to do with me being mean or obstinate, but mainstream science simply wasn't on their side (and still
1080:
page within it may be imposed without further warning or AE discussion by any uninvolved administrator. You are encouraged to engage community dispute resolution processes if a discussion reaches an impasse rather than continuing discussions which have become fruitless or intractable.
685:. I have great respect for truth. At the same time I am a mastermind at weaponizing truth. I like wiki-persecuting bigots, pseudoscientists and quacks. Do you think I'm mean? The watchdog must bite. That means that I'm not a fool, and I will report to admins the violations of our
689:. It also means that I don't shy away from using mainstream scientific/scholarly works against cults, quacks, and pseudoscientists. It does not mean I violate your right to believe what you please. But here at Knowledge (XXG) you have to behave according to our own
662:
could not figure out if I am pro-porn or anti-porn, so they accused me of being both. Same applies to being pro-Christian and anti-Christian: some have accused me of being outright
Antichristic, while others have accused me of writing ads for born-again Christians.
666:
The idea that the Bible was copied 100% exactly, that it lacks any mistake and any contradiction, that it has not been severely contradicted by mainstream archaeology is bigotry, not
Christianity. The definition of Christianity isn't "the Bible is without error".
992:, that can be interpreted as Chinese people or Chinese scientists or the Chinese government. When using generalizing terms, you leave more room for someone to be hurt by your words, even if they are accurate and said without the intention of doing harm. ~
697:
Blaming me for the fact that
Knowledge (XXG) has rules that get enforced is deeply idiotic. I did not ban your pet theology from Knowledge (XXG). I lack the power to do so. It is simply so that pushing fringe POVs is not acceptable to this encyclopedia.
1006:
Let me tell you something: me, as a Romanian, and many Romanians I spoke to, have no problem in admitting that scientific research from Romania is crappy. I don't feel offended by it, and neither do most Romanians, since they know it's a real fact.
947:
Noticed this ANI notice. I'm definitely not in agreement with the IP—I've interacted with you enough to know there's no reason to suspect you of racism—but I wanted to point out something that could stave off similar false accusations.
969:
If they want that their scientific research prospers, attacking objective criticism is not the way to do it. They should not be shooting the messenger, since admitting they have a problem would be the first step towards improvement.
560:
The strategy is simply to cooperate on the first iteration of the game; after that, the player does what his or her opponent did on the previous move. Depending on the situation, a slightly better strategy can be "tit for tat with
517:
which govern how editors should edit, how should they behave and how conflict gets mediated. Everybody is entitled to occasional mistakes, but persisting in mistakes will get you blocked from editing. Our wish is, however, that
726:
Having your POV not touted by Knowledge (XXG) is not a violation of human rights. Knowledge (XXG) does not violate your right to believe what you please, it just does not assume by default that you're right.
35:
791:
606:
showing that you're right, I will write myself from your POV. Seriously, the deal is this: give me sources that you advocate a major academic POV and I will write from this POV. The article
595:, accept the criticism and comply with it. If you have started a conflict, stop the conflict and offer your excuses for it. If you seek to avoid blocks or topic bans through
1100:
929:
1108:
394:
339:
279:
164:
104:
737:
Knowledge (XXG) is crowdsourced, while Britannica and Larousse aren't. That's the only difference. For the rest all three have the same ideals and values.
459:
449:
444:
419:
409:
404:
364:
354:
349:
304:
294:
289:
244:
234:
229:
189:
179:
174:
129:
119:
114:
74:
64:
59:
454:
414:
399:
359:
344:
299:
284:
239:
224:
184:
169:
124:
109:
69:
799:
563:
I'm usually acting as the first line of defense: just because you fooled me it doesn't mean your edits will be accepted by other established editors.
489:
389:
334:
274:
219:
159:
99:
469:
464:
429:
424:
374:
369:
314:
309:
254:
249:
199:
194:
139:
134:
79:
1127:
484:
479:
439:
384:
379:
329:
324:
269:
264:
214:
209:
154:
149:
94:
89:
671:
In the long term, reasoned argument and good quality sources works, hysterical accusations of bias and malfeasance simply get you shown the door.
658:
which would imply that sex/porn/masturbation addiction would be a valid diagnosis. None of that has anything to do with my own person, does it?
1036:
My two cents are that either the IP does not know what the word "racism" means, or the IP is throwing everything at the wall, hoping to stick.
825:
681:
Remember: truth is my weapon and if you misbehave, I will use it against you. If you want to accuse me of something nasty, present evidence or
474:
434:
319:
259:
204:
144:
84:
933:
905:
879:
based on nationality, race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, or other factors.
655:
1096:
863:
1085:
647:
576:
I am neither humble (thinking that nothing can be really known, so everything goes) nor cocky (thinking that I know everything).
1123:
1104:
886:
732:
If your edit gets deleted because the Ivy League finds it is rubbish, it is not discrimination, and it is nothing personal.
643:
1116:
899:
1119:
for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
1112:
1092:
893:). Articles or files of which the only purpose is to attack, harass, threaten or disparage certain people or groups
778:
29:
542:. I don't revert if these are uncertain. I think that you need to make up your mind if you are for or against our
1131:
appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you.
708:
42:
937:
909:
747:
You are welcome to edit here, but you must do so within our guidelines, asking you to do that is not bullying.
638:
If you are here to complain about my edits in respect to porn addiction: there is no official document from
651:
876:
829:
752:
890:
659:
546:. If you're against our rules and act on that, you'll soon find yourself in hot water. If your edits are
847:
on the other hand, the young people article looks to be better written than the latter. So maybe leave.
627:
may join us. (Yes, yes, Knowledge (XXG) has to have rules; we cannot run such a website without rules.)
551:
852:
837:
555:
581:
535:
1167:
1147:
1132:
48:
704:
690:
686:
624:
611:
596:
592:
566:
The question is not so much whether Wikipedians should be tolerant or intolerant, but: tolerant
554:. I am very tolerant with those who don't deride science/history/our encyclopedia. According to
543:
539:
524:
519:
514:
1115:
to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be
1027:
997:
957:
748:
502:
44:
894:
682:
631:
588:. When the community thinks that you made a mistake, accept the judgment of the community.
585:
547:
1153:
1037:
1008:
971:
580:
which is a matter of being blocked or banned, but persisting in that mistake. Exceptions:
703:
The recipe for getting past my "theological" objections is quite simple: don't challenge
603:
531:
848:
833:
1068:
1023:
993:
953:
607:
984:
This is more of what I'm concerned about. Again, it's not what you're saying, but
870:
772:
716:
Having your POV not touted by Britannica is not a violation of human rights.
599:
you will get banned from Knowledge (XXG). We are tolerant, but not retarded.
721:
Having your POV not touted by Larousse is not a violation of human rights.
46:
966:
Avoiding racism does not mean "speak no evil of Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot".
1172:
1161:
1137:
1045:
1031:
1016:
1001:
979:
961:
941:
913:
856:
841:
792:"Homeopaths to Jimmy Wales: please rewrite reality to make us not wrong"
1152:
I consider the above as an opportunity to learn. I did whine too much.
897:. If you add hateful, derogatory, or bigoted content again, you may be
1062:
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
1166:
Glad to hear that, and I hope the remedy will never need to be used.
1101:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience#Final decision
932:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
1084:
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to
877:
attack, harass, threaten, or disparage certain people or groups
639:
530:
I only revert edits for which it is clear to me that they are
49:
875:
Do not add slurs, images, symbols, or other content meant to
1122:
You may appeal this sanction using the process described
949:
889:
at any time by an administrator (or in extreme cases,
1022:
Chinese scientific scholarship, let me know. Best, ~
930:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
1111:. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the
774:Why the Dutch always say what they mean – BBC REEL
669:
1091:This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an
824:Hi, do you think it makes more sense to merge
1077:
745:
8:
1075:The following sanction now applies to you:
711:for evangelical/traditionalist positions.
18:
1107:. This sanction has been recorded in the
1128:arbitration enforcement appeals template
988:you're phrasing it. When you refer to a
765:
989:
885:by Knowledge (XXG) and as such may be
826:effects of pornography on young people
559:
538:), deteriorate the article or violate
707:(if there happens to be one) and use
7:
1086:this arbitration enforcement request
591:If you get criticism compliant with
928:There is currently a discussion at
14:
864:Talk:Traditional Chinese medicine
1067:
923:
869:
755:) 15:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
534:(speaking from the viewpoint of
22:
1126:. I recommend that you use the
602:I'm not absurd: if you give me
1173:14:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1162:19:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1138:18:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1046:11:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
1032:21:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
1017:18:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
1002:17:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
980:17:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
962:16:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
942:11:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
914:10:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
857:05:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
842:05:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
1105:contentious topics procedure
790:Chapman, Guy (1 July 2015).
1095:under the authority of the
1191:
904:without further notice.
501:This page is archived by
1103:and, if applicable, the
1093:uninvolved administrator
887:hidden from public view
1082:
830:effects of pornography
757:
679:
584:, child grooming, and
1097:Arbitration Committee
895:are speedily deleted
623:earnestly obeys our
552:secular encyclopedia
513:Knowledge (XXG) has
796:Guy Chapman's Blahg
630:If you are here to
903:
884:
880:
556:prisoner's dilemma
1171:
1136:
898:
882:
874:
616:precisely because
536:academic learning
511:
510:
506:
1182:
1170:
1151:
1135:
1109:log of sanctions
1071:
927:
926:
881:Such content is
873:
812:
811:
809:
807:
802:on 22 April 2016
798:. Archived from
787:
781:
775:
770:
677:
610:is replete with
570:And: intolerant
500:
50:
26:
25:
19:
1190:
1189:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1145:
1142:
1141:
1099:'s decision at
1072:
1064:
924:
921:
867:
822:
817:
816:
815:
805:
803:
789:
788:
784:
773:
771:
767:
758:
742:
738:
733:
728:
722:
717:
712:
709:WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV
699:
683:shut up forever
678:
675:
507:
51:
45:
23:
12:
11:
5:
1188:
1186:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1113:banning policy
1073:
1066:
1065:
1063:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
967:
934:202.40.137.199
920:
917:
906:202.40.137.199
866:
861:
860:
859:
821:
818:
814:
813:
782:
764:
763:
759:
744:
741:
736:
731:
725:
720:
715:
702:
696:
673:
509:
508:
499:
498:
495:
494:
493:
492:
487:
482:
477:
472:
467:
462:
457:
452:
447:
442:
437:
432:
427:
422:
417:
412:
407:
402:
397:
395:2022/September
392:
387:
382:
377:
372:
367:
362:
357:
352:
347:
342:
340:2021/September
337:
332:
327:
322:
317:
312:
307:
302:
297:
292:
287:
282:
280:2020/September
277:
272:
267:
262:
257:
252:
247:
242:
237:
232:
227:
222:
217:
212:
207:
202:
197:
192:
187:
182:
177:
172:
167:
165:2018/September
162:
157:
152:
147:
142:
137:
132:
127:
122:
117:
112:
107:
105:2017/September
102:
97:
92:
87:
82:
77:
72:
67:
62:
54:
53:
52:
47:
43:
41:
40:
27:
16:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1187:
1174:
1169:
1168:Seraphimblade
1165:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1149:
1148:Seraphimblade
1144:
1143:
1140:
1139:
1134:
1133:Seraphimblade
1129:
1125:
1120:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1089:
1087:
1081:
1076:
1070:
1061:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1005:
1004:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
987:
983:
982:
981:
977:
973:
968:
965:
964:
963:
959:
955:
951:
946:
945:
944:
943:
939:
935:
931:
918:
916:
915:
911:
907:
901:
896:
892:
888:
883:not tolerated
878:
872:
865:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
845:
844:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
819:
801:
797:
793:
786:
783:
780:
776:
769:
766:
762:
756:
754:
750:
743:
739:
734:
729:
723:
718:
713:
710:
706:
700:
694:
692:
688:
684:
672:
668:
664:
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
636:
633:
628:
626:
620:
617:
613:
609:
605:
600:
598:
594:
589:
587:
586:legal threats
583:
577:
574:
573:
569:
564:
562:
561:forgiveness".
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
528:
526:
521:
516:
504:
497:
496:
491:
488:
486:
483:
481:
478:
476:
473:
471:
468:
466:
463:
461:
460:2024/February
458:
456:
453:
451:
450:2023/December
448:
446:
445:2023/November
443:
441:
438:
436:
433:
431:
428:
426:
423:
421:
420:2023/February
418:
416:
413:
411:
410:2022/December
408:
406:
405:2022/November
403:
401:
398:
396:
393:
391:
388:
386:
383:
381:
378:
376:
373:
371:
368:
366:
365:2022/February
363:
361:
358:
356:
355:2021/December
353:
351:
350:2021/November
348:
346:
343:
341:
338:
336:
333:
331:
328:
326:
323:
321:
318:
316:
313:
311:
308:
306:
305:2021/February
303:
301:
298:
296:
295:2020/December
293:
291:
290:2020/November
288:
286:
283:
281:
278:
276:
273:
271:
268:
266:
263:
261:
258:
256:
253:
251:
248:
246:
245:2020/February
243:
241:
238:
236:
235:2019/December
233:
231:
230:2019/November
228:
226:
223:
221:
218:
216:
213:
211:
208:
206:
203:
201:
198:
196:
193:
191:
190:2019/February
188:
186:
183:
181:
180:2018/December
178:
176:
175:2018/November
173:
171:
168:
166:
163:
161:
158:
156:
153:
151:
148:
146:
143:
141:
138:
136:
133:
131:
130:2018/February
128:
126:
123:
121:
120:2017/December
118:
116:
115:2017/November
113:
111:
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
81:
78:
76:
75:2017/February
73:
71:
68:
66:
65:2016/December
63:
61:
60:2016/November
58:
57:
56:
55:
38:
37:
32:
31:
21:
20:
17:
1157:
1121:
1090:
1083:
1078:
1074:
1041:
1012:
985:
975:
950:In this edit
922:
902:from editing
868:
823:
804:. Retrieved
800:the original
795:
785:
768:
760:
749:Slatersteven
746:
740:
735:
730:
724:
719:
714:
701:
695:
680:
670:
665:
660:WP:ACTIVISTS
637:
629:
621:
615:
608:masturbation
601:
590:
578:
575:
571:
567:
565:
529:
512:
455:2024/January
415:2023/January
400:2022/October
360:2022/January
345:2021/October
300:2021/January
285:2020/October
240:2020/January
225:2019/October
185:2019/January
170:2018/October
125:2018/January
110:2017/October
70:2017/January
34:
28:
15:
676:Guy Chapman
503:ClueBot III
490:2024/August
390:2022/August
335:2021/August
275:2020/August
220:2019/August
160:2018/August
100:2017/August
1154:tgeorgescu
1038:tgeorgescu
1009:tgeorgescu
972:tgeorgescu
891:suppressed
806:16 January
761:References
572:with what?
568:with what?
470:2024/April
465:2024/March
430:2023/April
425:2023/March
375:2022/April
370:2022/March
315:2021/April
310:2021/March
255:2020/April
250:2020/March
200:2019/April
195:2019/March
140:2018/April
135:2018/March
80:2017/March
849:Zenomonoz
834:Zenomonoz
485:2024/July
480:2024/June
440:2023/July
385:2022/July
380:2022/June
330:2021/July
325:2021/June
270:2020/July
265:2020/June
215:2019/July
210:2019/June
155:2018/July
150:2018/June
95:2017/July
90:2017/June
919:ANI 2024
820:Question
705:WP:RS/AC
691:WP:RULES
687:WP:RULES
652:Cochrane
625:WP:RULES
612:WP:RS/AC
597:WP:SOCKS
593:WP:RULES
544:WP:RULES
540:WP:RULES
525:WP:RULES
520:WP:RULES
515:WP:RULES
475:2024/May
435:2023/May
320:2021/May
260:2020/May
205:2019/May
145:2018/May
85:2017/May
30:Archives
1117:blocked
1024:Pbritti
994:Pbritti
954:Pbritti
900:blocked
779:YouTube
632:promote
614:claims
582:outing
548:WP:PAG
828:into
604:WP:RS
532:WP:CB
36:Index
1158:talk
1124:here
1042:talk
1028:talk
1013:talk
998:talk
990:they
976:talk
958:talk
938:talk
910:talk
853:talk
838:talk
808:2021
753:talk
1160:)
1044:)
1015:)
986:how
978:)
777:on
656:APA
654:or
648:APA
644:AMA
640:WHO
1088:.
1030:)
1000:)
960:)
940:)
912:)
855:)
840:)
832:?
794:.
693:.
674:—
650:,
646:,
642:,
558:,
527:.
39:)
1156:(
1150::
1146:@
1040:(
1026:(
1011:(
996:(
974:(
956:(
936:(
908:(
851:(
836:(
810:.
751:(
505:.
33:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.