114:, placed a "Proposed deletion" tag on your article. You removed it, which you're entitled to do -- that tag is for articles that nobody minds deleting, so when you removed the tag, it meant you objected to deleting the article, and that's why I shouldn't have added it back. (It was just a mistake on my part.) Now Irongargoyle has added an "Article for Deletion" tag to the article; that's for articles that need to be discussed before they can be deleted. He did that because he still thinks it needs to be deleted, but you removed the "Proposed deletion" tag. So now, to keep the article, you should click on the link on that tag that says "this article's entry", where you can add a note to the discussion arguing for keeping the article. After a week, an administrator will look at all the arguments and decide what to do.
262:
182:
hello, well you cannot judge how big the company is by searching google and see how many links the company has I can get a web page generator and get millions of page listed in google but thats not how you judge how big the company is goto msn and see how many pages goto any other search engine and
186:
So by search engine you cannot judge, if thats how you judge companies than its very unprofessional. Now you are using you are not a company directory well if you search ritz camera you will see they are listed to inyour web site so that means you are listing companies on your web site it just a
190:
I agree that search engines by themselves do not make a complete argument. If a search engine doesn't find any evidence that would satisfy
Knowledge's criteria for notability, though, then the evidence has to be provided. If you look at this link:
144:
I just posted an explanation above -- I hope that helps. If not, please post here again or on my talkpage. If you need further help you could try posting the {{helpme}} tag again, but I hope I can help you.
166:; there must be some reason why a particular subject is significant enough to be be included, as this is not a business directory that would include every company in the world. —
220:
This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations.
289:
192:
159:
215:
Trivial coverage, such as newspaper articles that simply report extended shopping hours or the publications of telephone numbers and addresses in business directories.
241:
162:. If there is information that can be added to the article that would satisfy the criteria of that document, then it it should be kept. Basically, this is an
327:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
65:
240:
I hope this is useful. If you can show that any of the above criteria are met, please post a note saying so at the deletion discussion which is
332:
25:
to
Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
212:
Media re-prints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about itself, and advertising for the company.
206:
The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself.
225:
The company or corporation is listed on ranking indices of important companies produced by well-known and independent publications.
297:
336:
301:
140:
If you are mistaken so that means my article is OK, can I have my
Hyperlink please remove that Deletion tag from the article
68:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
49:
34:
22:
269:
321:
93:
Hi -- I just wanted to let you know that I was mistaken when I replaced the "proposed for deletion" template on your
305:
54:
273:
276:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
248:
149:
123:
101:
80:
29:
61:
110:
Hi again -- sorry if it's confusing; that's partly my fault. What happened was that another editor,
94:
340:
313:
69:
320:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
245:
229:
146:
120:
98:
97:
article. When you deleted the tag, I should not have replaced it; I won't do so again. Thanks.
77:
44:
111:
76:
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
171:
328:
281:
39:
261:
346:
163:
296:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy
Knowledge's
285:
167:
137:
I am confuse will my article get deleted if yes what did I do wrong please help
183:
type wholesale barmops and you will see we are no#1 our yearly sales are 5MIL.
357:
251:
177:
152:
126:
104:
83:
244:. If you can't figure out how to do that, let me know and I'll help.
119:
Post another note to my on my talk page if you have more questions.
195:
you'll see what the guideline says. Here's the important piece:
228:
The company's or corporation's share price is used to calculate
331:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
260:
308:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
232:. Being used to calculate an index that simply comprises
300:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
290:Knowledge:Notability (organizations and companies)
193:Knowledge:Notability (companies and corporations)
160:Knowledge:Notability (companies and corporations)
198:A company or corporation is notable if it meets
257:Proposed deletion of SaaSoh Textile Corporation
8:
187:matter who you like and who you NOT like.
60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
272:template has been added to the article
7:
72:, ask me on my talk page, or place
14:
284:has not been established from
1:
339:, where it may be deleted if
30:The five pillars of Knowledge
358:03:51, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
50:How to write a great article
306:Knowledge's deletion policy
252:15:04, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
202:of the following criteria:
178:04:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
153:04:14, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
127:04:12, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
105:03:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
84:03:57, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
373:
274:SaaSoh Textile Corporation
21:Hello, Thetoweldepot, and
329:proposed deletion process
209:This criterion excludes:
333:speedy deletion criteria
288:third part sources, per
343:to delete is reached.
298:criteria for inclusion
265:
337:Articles for Deletion
335:or it can be sent to
302:What Knowledge is not
264:
230:stock market indices
70:Knowledge:Questions
266:
35:How to edit a page
356:
270:proposed deletion
234:the entire market
364:
355:
353:
351:
319:
318:
312:
75:
372:
371:
367:
366:
365:
363:
362:
361:
347:
345:
316:
310:
309:
259:
135:
95:The Towel Depot
91:
89:The Towel Depot
73:
55:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
370:
368:
294:
293:
258:
255:
238:
237:
226:
223:
222:
221:
218:
217:
216:
213:
156:
155:
134:
131:
130:
129:
116:
115:
90:
87:
66:sign your name
58:
57:
52:
47:
42:
37:
32:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
369:
360:
359:
354:
352:
350:
342:
338:
334:
330:
325:
323:
322:its talk page
315:
307:
303:
299:
292:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:
277:
275:
271:
263:
256:
254:
253:
250:
247:
246:Mike Christie
243:
235:
231:
227:
224:
219:
214:
211:
210:
208:
207:
205:
204:
203:
201:
196:
194:
188:
184:
180:
179:
175:
174:
169:
165:
161:
154:
151:
148:
147:Mike Christie
143:
142:
141:
138:
132:
128:
125:
122:
121:Mike Christie
118:
117:
113:
109:
108:
107:
106:
103:
100:
99:Mike Christie
96:
88:
86:
85:
82:
79:
78:Mike Christie
71:
67:
63:
56:
53:
51:
48:
46:
43:
41:
38:
36:
33:
31:
28:
27:
26:
24:
19:
18:
348:
344:
326:
295:
280:
267:
239:
236:is excluded.
233:
199:
197:
189:
185:
181:
172:
164:encyclopedia
157:
139:
136:
133:Help section
112:Irongargoyle
92:
59:
20:
16:
15:
314:dated prod
286:verifiable
282:Notability
74:{{helpme}}
62:Wikipedian
40:Help pages
341:consensus
64:! Please
45:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
349:Barkeep
200:any one
23:welcome
304:" and
249:(talk)
168:Centrx
150:(talk)
124:(talk)
102:(talk)
81:(talk)
242:here
173:talk
158:See
324:.
317:}}
311:{{
268:A
176:•
170:→
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.