Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:The Duke of Waltham

Source 📝

487:
essentially stopped editing succession boxes except to just update them to the current standards (I found a number of old HTML ones when doing some genealogical research on the Wittelsbach dynasty). I have been contributing other information to articles since my PhD project seems me visiting the site frequently to clarify certain things, but succession boxes are generally left to the wayside unless I am certain an edit can be made without comment or reversion. I have occasionally applied the tried and tested method of making an edit to a box and then immediately making a minor edit to something else (a grammatical error or format error) in the hope that my first edit was not noticed, but this does not always succeed. I rather despise such covert means of editing in any case, but such is life. I have plenty of projects on my hands outside of Knowledge (XXG) to become enmeshed in new wars with the generally high school-aged, lowly-educated Tories that dominate these pages in this dark age. I thank you for your reply and I, too, am saddened that you cannot help, but such is life. We all must move on and allow our excellent project on Succession Box Standardisation to evolve or die, as all must do. Cheers!
450:
consistently and systematically, and although I occasionally fix or improve the odd box I chance upon, it is but rarely that I undertake wider projects, even as small as fixing a single succession chain across a handful of articles. Various obligations have come to impose upon my time and I have been absent from SBS for years, something caused in part by a series of initiatives and proposals frustrated mostly by inactivity and low participation. Perhaps my absence has contributed further to this withering of our erstwhile active, if small community, but the general trend is worrisome to say the least. I have little hope that any sustained effort could possibly be mounted to improve conditions in this area. I have given up.
399:
reading my comments on this page, Wikihounding me even though their hounding has a basis in Knowledge (XXG) policy. The issue at stake are succession boxes that show neither predecessors nor successors, instances such as stand-alone pretenders whose claims are subsequently abandoned, or title-holders who, for whatever reason, are unique in their line of succession. Many of the deleted boxes have been present for many years – even since the beginning – but are now being challenged. I fear searching and editing more such articles just because I feel that my edits will not only be reverted, but that the box will be deleted entirely.
209: 411:
articles that they have contributed to) does not wish to add titles held in pretence as succession boxes since the term itself is anachronistic. The fact that the idea behind the term is not, in fact, anachronistic is apparently beyond them. I haven't yet thought up a solution to this problem. I see no problem continuing to call them pretenders despite the anachronism, but others may disagree. Do we have a policy regarding pretenders specifically and how to handle their succession boxes?
109: 914: 704:, sir. He is confident that he will publish his first article within the month, although I've bet ten pounds with Preston, the driver, that he will give up on it at least once and only pick it up again next year. He does seem determined this time, I'll give him that. I shall pass your regards at lunchtime, sir, along with the sandwich tray; I'm sure His Grace will want to hear what you busying yourself with these days. 1334: 1550: 1379: 1581: 1017: 980: 875: 833: 1420: 1247: 1077: 241: 1027: 885: 403:
strictly speaking, depict successions? Instances of one-off nobles and royals whose presumably successive titles never ended up being used in such a manner? If so, I'd love to be pointed to the documentation for it so that we can finally put this matter to rest. Currently, my hounder will delete any succession box that does not show a predecessor and/or successor. Their latest victim was just
1510: 458:
boxes can be seen as unnecessary clutter, which offer no navigational benefits and merely repeat things from the article; on the other hand, many people have come to expect to find such information at the bottom of articles, and taking boxes away compromises the completeness of the system. I cannot judge which view is best, at the moment, and cannot afford to involve myself further.
1205: 328:; in other words, an exchange that begins in one talk page should continue in that same talk page, in order to keep the discussion whole and intelligible. If a conversation has begun in a venue other than this, you need not answer here; you can rest assured that I shall notify the Duke about any new messages (through use of a designated watchlist). 1163: 462:
that it might serve as an example to others. I remember hearing about a specific case and being inspired by the solution to apply it to a slightly wider class of cases, but not much came out of it. It's all a bit vague in my mind, but our ambitious goals about organisation and guidelines never really amounted to much.
457:
I do remember that we have discussed at least once the matter of succession boxes as you describe (with stand-alone cells, so to speak, not being part of a chain), but I cannot say we had much of a policy about it, or about several other things for that matter. I can see both sides: on one hand, such
410:
There is also the added problem I've had with another user regarding pretentious titles. It seems our term "Titles held in pretence" is too anachronistic for some since the term "pretender" did not exist in such a form in the Middle Ages. The user in question (who, to be fair, is highly protective of
449:
Great Khan, I am so happy to hear from your terrible majesty once again. I feared that you had left these lands forever, a departure that was only followed by greater decline in our beloved project, and in Knowledge (XXG) overall. Alas, it has been a long time since I last worked on succession boxes
414:
It has been too long since I regularly edited Wiki articles, but I am deep in research these days and consult Knowledge (XXG) regularly for simple clarifications, so I can't avoid it any more. Apparently by trying to improve the succession boxes, I have imperilled many of them, much to my dismay. Do
398:
Somehow it has come to the attention of a certain user that I enjoy editing and updating succession boxes. They have seemed to now make it their goal in life to not only revert my changes and additions to succession boxes, but to delete them entirely from some pages. I fear that even now the user is
592:
developing here, and I wonder whether someone might carry it even further, but I assure you it wouldn't pass muster in the English Knowledge (XXG), where people are serious enough about heraldry and the Peerage that they wouldn't let these arms mingle with the rest without so much as a disclaimer.
647:
It certainly was a lot of work doing it on Microsoft Paint, even at this relatively low resolution, but one had few choices without knowledge of Inkscape (if it even existed in 2007) or some similar design software. Don't mention it to His Grace, but I actually know what prototype he used for the
461:
Similarly, the matter of pretenders has been addressed on a couple of occasions, but really what generally happened was that some people encountered certain special cases and treated them as they saw fit, creating a precedent that no one knew or cared about sufficiently to note down somewhere, so
402:
I know we dealt long ago with a fight between ourselves and the people who favoured large collapsable infoboxes for succession lists. That fight seems to have resolved itself in a manner that both parties could keep their boxes. But have we ever discussed the issue of succession boxes that don't,
486:
Thank you for your reply, your grace. It has indeed been a long time that either of us have been involved with the project and I am disappointed whenever I come across a page that once had a succession box and has since been replaced with a collapsed infobox. So unhelpful! For the moment, I have
394:
Monsieur le duc, it has been too long since we last spoke and certainly years since we worked together to standardise the succession boxes across Knowledge (XXG), a project that I think we can both agree has bee largely a success. Indeed, from what I can tell on the group page, it seems our fair
331:
Old discussions are archived with extreme care, even though half of them do not deserve such treatment in the least. But who am I but an underpaid member of the staff, to be judging my boss's gossip. Well, for those interested, the archives are open to the public from 09:00 to 17:00, Mondays to
453:
Which is why it has taken me so long to reply to your message: I didn't quite know how to say that I cannot be of any material assistance to you. I considered doing some research, but the appetite has left me and, in any case, I am too busy writing an article to take time off—my first article,
407:, Lady of the English. He deleted the box stating that the title was non-successive. Granted it had its own issues, but he didn't fix the issues, he just deleted the box. I've since corrected the issues and restored it, but this was a case where such a correction was an option. 624:, and I don't mean to be a spoil-sport! His Grace's arms are actually a magnificent illustration of a heraldic helm, so I've left the Thai article as is; unfortunately the German list of Scallop-bearing arms is now bereft of the Waltham insignia, though I still contend 589: 927:
I would like to ask your natural helplessness to send me an archive of the SarcasmSociety. As you are probably suspecting, I would like to enjoy the beautiful conversations and the times in which you and others were, in all probability, smarter than now.
139: 1215:. "If you find yourself horribly offended by such a thing (a 14 pixel image of questioned race/sex/copyright) , you really need to grow some thicker skin. Jtrainor (talk) 2:55 pm, 30 March 2008, Sunday (14 years, 7 months, 25 days ago) (UTC+11) 395:
standardisation project may be heading for merger into a larger group. However, I do not write to you about the good old days. Nay, I write concerning a problem I have been having of late with a specific situation involving succession boxes.
593:(Or at least they used to be; most WikiProjects are but shadows of their former selves these days.) Well, I've added one to the image file itself, just to be safe. It shouldn't spoil the fun... It's just that I'd hate to see a repetition of 923:
After a few years in which we heard less from each other and I discovered that coincidence is definitely a better friend seeker, I decided to send you a missive with a request that might convince you to actually do something.
783: 701: 1465: 1292: 1120: 1212: 743:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 465:
I am really sorry for the delay in my response, and for not having something more useful to tell you. I hope you can find a solution to your problem. I just wish I could be more optimistic about it...
1449:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1276:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1104:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1434: 1261: 1090: 538: 1389: 1371: 1210:
I enjoyed your comment from a mere 14 years ago, so please share a Sunday evening virtual Felafel (with Siracha sauce) in Melbourne Australia. (And as you are a Peer, a dram of Drambuie.
1383:
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
135: 1182:
to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
526: 563: 122: 55: 1177: 1218:
I don't think your suggestion is biologically feasible, Jtrainor, although nothing should surprise us with modern science... :-D Waltham, The Duke of
567: 371:
It's a fair point. I guess I didn't think it very likely that the vandal would care to check the history on who has reverted them and when (and why).
80: 620: 594: 289: 284: 279: 274: 269: 264: 259: 1394: 192: 1488: 1315: 1143: 768: 48: 108: 87: 537:
in the last six months, I'd like to invite you to a discussion about the use of honorifics in those lists. The discussion is happening
650: 76: 152: 1173: 505: 436: 1484: 1311: 1139: 764: 625: 41: 1562: 1516: 1458: 1285: 1113: 990: 844: 534: 530: 588:
His Grace would be delighted to hear of this, I'm sure, which is why I'll see to it that he doesn't. There appears to be
1169: 143: 755:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1470: 1297: 1125: 998: 760: 1384: 299: 1612: 1357: 1341: 953: 705: 655: 598: 466: 372: 318: 208: 164: 64: 1446: 1273: 1101: 361: 1528: 994: 784:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Succession Box Standardization/Guidelines#Lines of succession to thrones
756: 1387:
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
856: 1570: 1213:
Knowledge (XXG):Village_pump_(policy)/Image:User.gif:_unintended_bias?#This_entire_thread_is_retarded
941: 791: 500: 431: 1428: 1255: 1084: 732: 723: 321:'s private secretary. On behalf of the Duke, I should like to welcome you to His Grace's talk page. 1351: 1442: 1269: 1097: 752: 736: 335:
Please don't leave any litter while you are here. There is a dustbin in the corner (where the old
1403: 1226: 357: 305: 937: 1524: 1037: 913: 895: 1454: 1390:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members
1372:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members
1281: 1109: 748: 740: 1477: 1304: 1187: 1132: 852: 562:
I am sure the Duke will be gratified to learn (if he has not already) that he has, at last,
301: 1457:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1450: 1345: 1284:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1277: 1112:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1105: 751:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 744: 1600: 1566: 1057: 813: 787: 689: 493: 424: 404: 681:
Noting His Grace's presence on this site—very welcome. Please pass this on, Cartwright.
1398: 1222: 544: 1623: 1605: 1574: 1532: 1492: 1408: 1364: 1319: 1230: 1191: 1147: 1062: 1044: 1002: 964: 945: 902: 860: 818: 795: 772: 716: 694: 666: 634: 609: 582: 549: 512: 477: 443: 383: 365: 303: 1333: 240: 1419: 1246: 1076: 1016: 979: 874: 832: 1611:
I'm not… But I've never left entirely, either. You can't keep a nitpicker down!
1509: 1183: 934:
P.S. Also, I'm considering reuniting some of the court on reddit. What say you?
1026: 884: 1595: 1549: 1052: 806: 682: 630: 578: 221: 216: 573:
My only question is when this list will be included in our own encyclopedia.
415:
you have any advice, my old friend, to help our project through these times?
1580: 1204: 1461:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1288:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1162: 1116:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1565:, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! 1438:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1265:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1094:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
739:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
33: 332:
Fridays. Try not to come on Fridays, though, because I close early.
1515:
Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the
628:—even without his Grace—is not only inevitable, but necessary! ‑‑ 1474:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1301:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1129:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1464:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
1432:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
1291:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
1259:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
1119:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
37: 1544: 1504: 1088:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
974: 827: 306: 234: 1332: 1161: 1025: 1015: 952:
Hello! I can see you've also e-mailed me; I'll reply there.
912: 883: 873: 356:
No need to tell the IP editor he's breaking the formatting!
175: 570:", as fellow bearers of coats of arms containing scallops. 525:
Hi The Duke of Waltham. Since you've edited one or more of
541:, and I look forward to a helpful and robust discussion. 1158:
File:Lords Chamber (landscape).jpg listed for discussion
1445:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1272:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1100:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
648:
helm and coronet, and to a lesser extent the mantling.
24:
This user is no longer very active on Knowledge (XXG).
1051:
May I also wish His Grace the best for His birthday.
339:
s end up, and I couldn't care less about recycling).
527:
List of current members of the British Privy Council
159: 130: 116: 71: 782:Hello! Could you give your opinion on this issue: 731:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1033:Have a very happy birthday on your special day! 891:Have a very happy birthday on your special day! 324:Please note that His Grace follows a policy of 49: 8: 564:been included in the German Knowledge (XXG) 21:(More like Ninety-Nine-Per-Cent-Retired...) 1071: 56: 42: 34: 1561:Hi The Duke of Waltham! On behalf of the 1344:a very happy birthday on behalf of the 342:By the way, thank you for not smoking. 317:My name is Harold Cartwright, and I am 96:His Grace's private office and archives 838:Just a happy birthday message to you, 1168:A file that you uploaded or altered, 7: 1594:At least I hope you're coming back. 1429:2023 Arbitration Committee elections 1256:2022 Arbitration Committee elections 1174:Knowledge (XXG):Files for discussion 1085:2021 Arbitration Committee elections 203: 183: 1447:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1413:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message 1274:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1240:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message 1102:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1068:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message 846:Knowledge (XXG) Birthday Committee! 1517:Knowledge (XXG) Birthday Committee 1170:File:Lords Chamber (landscape).jpg 995:𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 991:Knowledge (XXG) Birthday Committee 521:Honorifics in lists of politicians 326:keeping conversations unfragmented 220:, and sends all contributions via 14: 757:review the candidates' statements 1579: 1548: 1508: 1418: 1377: 1245: 1203: 1075: 978: 831: 566:, next to the impeccibly named " 239: 207: 107: 1468:and submit your choices on the 1295:and submit your choices on the 1123:and submit your choices on the 805:His Grace's presence is noted. 654:is a truly magnificent helm... 778:Lines of succession to thrones 763:. For the Election committee, 733:Arbitration Committee election 724:ArbCom elections are now open! 550:20:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC) 535:Official Opposition frontbench 270:1 September – 30 December 2007 214:This user contributes using a 136:Palace of Westminster workshop 1: 1493:00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 1320:00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 1231:08:33, 20 November 2022 (UTC) 1148:00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 773:16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 531:British Government frontbench 454:finally, after so many years! 444:22:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 346:Enjoy the rest of your day(s) 290:February 2009 – December 2014 180:His Grace The Duke of Waltham 1624:09:20, 28 January 2024 (UTC) 1606:09:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) 965:13:03, 5 November 2020 (UTC) 946:10:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC) 717:10:14, 18 October 2015 (UTC) 695:03:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC) 667:17:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC) 635:13:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC) 610:19:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC) 583:23:25, 15 October 2015 (UTC) 513:00:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC) 478:17:14, 18 October 2015 (UTC) 1575:02:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC) 1533:00:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC) 1409:09:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC) 1365:16:31, 1 January 2023 (UTC) 1063:03:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC) 1045:01:35, 1 January 2021 (UTC) 1003:00:44, 1 January 2021 (UTC) 903:12:13, 1 January 2020 (UTC) 861:04:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC) 759:and submit your choices on 702:locked in his study writing 315:Greetings, dear Wikipedian. 153:Peerage Inspection Register 1642: 1485:MediaWiki message delivery 1312:MediaWiki message delivery 1140:MediaWiki message delivery 765:MediaWiki message delivery 100:(secretary: H. Cartwright) 1590:Glad to see you back, sir 1395:categories for discussion 1192:21:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC) 920:Dearest Duke of Waltham, 819:15:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC) 618:Good Lord! Sorry to read 384:23:23, 4 March 2015 (UTC) 366:19:00, 4 March 2015 (UTC) 285:25 June – 1 November 2008 275:1 January – 24 March 2008 105: 1482:to your user talk page. 1309:to your user talk page. 1137:to your user talk page. 796:05:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC) 265:27 June – 29 August 2007 280:30 March – 24 June 2008 260:13 March – 26 June 2007 123:Auto-formatting is evil 1337: 1166: 1030: 1020: 917: 888: 878: 712:per pro. H. Cartwright 662:per pro. H. Cartwright 605:per pro. H. Cartwright 507:of the Barbarian Horde 438:of the Barbarian Horde 165:Duncan, the Ducal Duck 1443:Arbitration Committee 1426:Hello! Voting in the 1336: 1270:Arbitration Committee 1253:Hello! Voting in the 1196:Some falafel for you! 1172:, has been listed at 1165: 1098:Arbitration Committee 1082:Hello! Voting in the 1029: 1019: 916: 887: 877: 840:The Duke of Waltham, 737:Arbitration Committee 590:a nice little in-joke 495:Darius von Whaleyland 426:Darius von Whaleyland 1567:The Herald (Benison) 1519:! Have a great day, 993:! Have a nice day!-- 1521:The Duke of Waltham 1342:The Duke of Waltham 987:The Duke of Waltham 741:arbitration process 390:Succession Box Wars 319:the Duke of Waltham 65:The Duke of Waltham 1563:Birthday Committee 1459:arbitration policy 1370:CfD nomination at 1346:Birthday Committee 1338: 1286:arbitration policy 1167: 1114:arbitration policy 1031: 1021: 918: 889: 879: 753:arbitration policy 626:an English version 352:Spilling the beans 1622: 1587: 1586: 1538: 1537: 1495: 1397:page. Thank you. 1322: 1237: 1236: 1176:. Please see the 1155: 1154: 1150: 1008: 1007: 963: 866: 865: 850:Have a great day! 715: 665: 608: 595:this sorry affair 476: 382: 312: 311: 233: 232: 228: 227: 200: 199: 190:This user can be 171: 170: 149: 101: 92: 1633: 1616: 1603: 1583: 1552: 1545: 1512: 1505: 1483: 1481: 1422: 1406: 1401: 1381: 1380: 1363: 1360: 1354: 1310: 1308: 1249: 1207: 1200: 1199: 1138: 1136: 1079: 1072: 1060: 1042: 1024: 985:Happy Birthday, 982: 975: 957: 900: 882: 851: 847: 835: 828: 816: 811: 709: 692: 687: 659: 633: 602: 581: 568:Turnip Townshend 555:Congratulations! 511: 508: 503: 499: 496: 470: 442: 439: 434: 430: 427: 376: 307: 243: 235: 211: 204: 193:reached by email 184: 176: 147: 111: 99: 90: 84: 58: 51: 44: 35: 18: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1601: 1592: 1559: 1557:Happy birthday! 1543: 1541:Happy Birthday! 1503: 1501:Happy birthday! 1498: 1497: 1475: 1423: 1415: 1404: 1399: 1382: 1378: 1375: 1367: 1358: 1352: 1350: 1330: 1328:Happy Birthday! 1325: 1324: 1302: 1250: 1242: 1198: 1160: 1130: 1070: 1058: 1048: 1038: 1023:Happy Birthday! 1022: 1013: 1011:Happy Birthday! 973: 971:Happy Birthday! 911: 909:A goat for you! 906: 896: 881:Happy Birthday! 880: 871: 869:Happy Birthday! 845: 843: 826: 824:Happy Birthday! 814: 807: 803: 780: 761:the voting page 727: 690: 683: 679: 629: 577: 557: 523: 506: 501: 494: 492: 489: 437: 432: 425: 423: 420: 405:Empress Matilda 392: 354: 348:, if you must. 308: 302: 248: 229: 201: 181: 174: 173: 172: 167: 155: 126: 112: 103: 86: 67: 62: 25: 22: 16: 12: 11: 5: 1639: 1637: 1627: 1626: 1591: 1588: 1585: 1584: 1577: 1560: 1555: 1553: 1542: 1539: 1536: 1535: 1513: 1502: 1499: 1466:the candidates 1435:eligible users 1424: 1417: 1416: 1414: 1411: 1385:categorization 1376: 1374: 1368: 1353:Chris Troutman 1331: 1329: 1326: 1293:the candidates 1262:eligible users 1251: 1244: 1243: 1241: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1208: 1197: 1194: 1159: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1121:the candidates 1091:eligible users 1080: 1069: 1066: 1050: 1014: 1012: 1009: 1006: 1005: 983: 972: 969: 968: 967: 948: 931:What say you? 910: 907: 872: 870: 867: 864: 863: 849: 836: 825: 822: 802: 799: 779: 776: 730: 726: 721: 720: 719: 678: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 640: 639: 638: 637: 613: 612: 556: 553: 522: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 488: 481: 480: 463: 459: 455: 451: 419: 391: 388: 387: 386: 353: 350: 310: 309: 304: 300: 298: 295: 294: 293: 292: 287: 282: 277: 272: 267: 262: 254: 253: 250: 249: 244: 238: 231: 230: 226: 225: 212: 202: 198: 197: 188: 182: 179: 169: 168: 163: 161: 157: 156: 134: 132: 128: 127: 120: 118: 114: 113: 106: 104: 75: 73: 69: 68: 63: 61: 60: 53: 46: 38: 31: 29: 28: 27: 26: 23: 20: 19: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1638: 1625: 1621: 1620: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1604: 1599: 1598: 1589: 1582: 1578: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1558: 1554: 1551: 1547: 1546: 1540: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1507: 1506: 1500: 1496: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1479: 1473: 1472: 1467: 1462: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1439: 1437: 1436: 1431: 1430: 1421: 1412: 1410: 1407: 1402: 1396: 1392: 1391: 1386: 1373: 1369: 1366: 1361: 1355: 1349: 1347: 1343: 1335: 1327: 1323: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1306: 1300: 1299: 1294: 1289: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1266: 1264: 1263: 1258: 1257: 1248: 1239: 1233: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1219: 1216: 1214: 1209: 1206: 1202: 1201: 1195: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1175: 1171: 1164: 1157: 1151: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1134: 1128: 1127: 1122: 1117: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1093: 1092: 1087: 1086: 1081: 1078: 1074: 1073: 1067: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1056: 1055: 1047: 1046: 1043: 1041: 1036:Best wishes, 1034: 1028: 1018: 1010: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 984: 981: 977: 976: 970: 966: 962: 961: 955: 951: 950: 949: 947: 943: 939: 935: 932: 929: 925: 921: 915: 908: 905: 904: 901: 899: 894:Best wishes, 892: 886: 876: 868: 862: 858: 854: 848: 841: 837: 834: 830: 829: 823: 821: 820: 817: 812: 810: 800: 798: 797: 793: 789: 785: 777: 775: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 742: 738: 734: 725: 722: 718: 714: 713: 707: 703: 699: 698: 697: 696: 693: 688: 686: 676: 668: 664: 663: 657: 653: 652: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 641: 636: 632: 627: 623: 622: 617: 616: 615: 614: 611: 607: 606: 600: 596: 591: 587: 586: 585: 584: 580: 574: 571: 569: 565: 560: 554: 552: 551: 548: 547: 546: 540: 536: 532: 528: 520: 514: 510: 509: 504: 497: 485: 484: 483: 482: 479: 475: 474: 468: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 447: 446: 445: 441: 440: 435: 428: 416: 412: 408: 406: 400: 396: 389: 385: 381: 380: 374: 370: 369: 368: 367: 363: 359: 358:Chiswick Chap 351: 349: 347: 343: 340: 338: 333: 329: 327: 322: 320: 316: 297: 296: 291: 288: 286: 283: 281: 278: 276: 273: 271: 268: 266: 263: 261: 258: 257: 256: 255: 252: 251: 247: 242: 237: 236: 223: 219: 218: 213: 210: 206: 205: 195: 194: 189: 186: 185: 178: 177: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 124: 119: 115: 110: 102: 97: 93: 89: 82: 81:Contributions 78: 74: 70: 66: 59: 54: 52: 47: 45: 40: 39: 36: 32: 1618: 1617: 1596: 1593: 1556: 1525:Ezra Cricket 1520: 1469: 1463: 1440: 1433: 1427: 1425: 1388: 1339: 1296: 1290: 1267: 1260: 1254: 1252: 1220: 1217: 1211: 1178: 1124: 1118: 1095: 1089: 1083: 1053: 1049: 1040:CAPTAIN RAJU 1039: 1035: 1032: 986: 959: 958: 936: 933: 930: 926: 922: 919: 898:CAPTAIN RAJU 897: 893: 890: 839: 808: 804: 786:, please? -- 781: 728: 711: 710: 700:The Duke is 684: 680: 677:His presence 661: 660: 649: 619: 604: 603: 575: 572: 561: 558: 543: 542: 524: 491: 472: 471: 422: 417: 413: 409: 401: 397: 393: 378: 377: 355: 345: 344: 341: 336: 334: 330: 325: 323: 314: 313: 245: 215: 191: 146: 144:SBS workshop 98: 95: 83: 30: 17:SEMI-RETIRED 1619:The Duke of 1471:voting page 1298:voting page 1223:Wakelamp db 1126:voting page 989:, from the 960:The Duke of 853:Lepricavark 473:The Duke of 379:The Duke of 1455:topic bans 1282:topic bans 1179:discussion 1110:topic bans 788:Editor FIN 749:topic bans 559:Dear sir, 502:Great Khan 433:Great Khan 418:Sincerely, 222:snail mail 217:typewriter 148:(inactive) 88:edit count 1451:site bans 1278:site bans 1106:site bans 842:from the 801:Greetings 745:site bans 576:Yours, ‑‑ 140:watchlist 131:Workshops 77:User page 72:Key pages 1400:Qwerfjkl 1340:Wishing 999:𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 337:Signpost 246:Archives 117:Writings 1613:Waltham 1478:NoACEMM 1393:on the 1305:NoACEMM 1133:NoACEMM 954:Waltham 815:(talk) 706:Waltham 691:(talk) 656:Waltham 599:Waltham 467:Waltham 373:Waltham 1602:(talk) 1184:Ixfd64 1059:(talk) 735:. The 631:Yodin 579:Yodin 160:Other 1597:Tony 1571:talk 1529:talk 1523:! -- 1489:talk 1441:The 1405:talk 1359:talk 1316:talk 1268:The 1227:talk 1188:talk 1144:talk 1096:The 1054:Tony 942:talk 938:Alin 857:talk 809:Tony 792:talk 769:talk 685:Tony 651:That 621:that 539:here 533:and 362:talk 138:and 729:Hi, 545:DBD 151:• 142:• 94:• 79:• 1615:, 1573:) 1531:) 1491:) 1480:}} 1476:{{ 1453:, 1318:) 1307:}} 1303:{{ 1280:, 1229:) 1221:W 1190:) 1146:) 1135:}} 1131:{{ 1108:, 1001:) 956:, 944:) 859:) 794:) 771:) 747:, 708:, 658:, 601:, 597:. 529:, 469:, 375:, 364:) 1569:( 1527:( 1487:( 1362:) 1356:( 1348:! 1314:( 1225:( 1186:( 1142:( 997:( 940:( 855:( 790:( 767:( 498:, 490:– 429:, 421:– 360:( 224:. 196:. 187:@ 125:" 121:" 91:) 85:( 57:e 50:t 43:v

Index

v
t
e
The Duke of Waltham
User page
Contributions
edit count
His Grace's private office and archives
Coat of arms of His Grace The Duke of Waltham
Auto-formatting is evil
Palace of Westminster workshop
watchlist
SBS workshop
Peerage Inspection Register
Duncan, the Ducal Duck
reached by email

typewriter
snail mail

13 March – 26 June 2007
27 June – 29 August 2007
1 September – 30 December 2007
1 January – 24 March 2008
30 March – 24 June 2008
25 June – 1 November 2008
February 2009 – December 2014
the Duke of Waltham
Chiswick Chap
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.