Knowledge

User talk:The Red/Archive 1

Source 📝

991:
again, I will assume you had a lapse in judgment because I suspect you're about 17 years old and don't have the experience to reflect for a few seconds before making an accusation. From the comments on your talk page, it seems to be a pattern for you. But your youth will only get you so much leeway; this is the last time I make such the assumption that your intentions are better than your judgment. I'd strongly suggest just letting this particular issue drop, and if you do no harm done. Have a good day.
1032: 31: 974:
better resolved by discussing on the talk page. However, in your dispute of my Personal Attack vandalism reversion, you came into my talk page and personally attacked me. Reverting vandalism on Knowledge is a volunteer effort, and the amount of vandalism and hoax edits are massively in odds against us. So even though you happened to fall into a false positive, I'd appreciate if you'd throw us a bone and be a little more polite next time.
1006:
understanding person. I truly hope that the next time you experience an issue similar to this, you respect everyone who desires to contribute. I feel I do a good job here on Knowledge, and others obviously do as well, so it saddens me to see that such a small disagreement is met with such malicious and arrogant rebuttals. Please do not think that because I have admitted a mistake I am condoning your behaviour.
363: 958:
reaction by someone who fancies himself the Knowledge police. That having been said, I thank you for your interest in improving Knowledge and hope we have satisfactorily resolved this misunderstanding. Otherwise if you disagree, please take it to the article's talk page in accordance with standard procedures on Knowledge. Have a good day!
990:
Once again you falsely accused me of a personal attack for simply pointing out your error which you yourself admit. How many edits you have made is entirely irrelevant here. I've edited Knowledge for seven years and made thousands and thousands of edits, but that is completely irrelevant. Now, once
973:
I've edited Knowledge some 2400 times, and I edit roughly 100 times a session. I am bound to make a few mistakes, and upon reviewing your sources for the section in question, it shows that the clarification is justified (if it's importance is still somewhat in question). My dispute would have been
957:
sources, and identifying the reviewers as religious is simply a clarification of the sentence, adding an important detail in identifying "some reviewers" and adding accurate information to inform the reader. So, I'll assume you had a momentary lapse in judgment rather than an overzealous knee-jerk
271: 1005:
I honestly question your history of edits to Knowledge and their neutrality if this is the way you treat other editors. Calling me inexperienced and "17 years old" because of a mistake that I made (and was humble enough to admit) is not the sign of a good editor, nor the sign of a respectful,
307: 554:. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. 903:
How is requesting a citation vandalism? I was reading the article, and found that it had a serious POV, that was uncited. Now deleting the passage, would be vandalism, but how is my action anywhere near it? Instead you are bombing me with warnings!
81:
as I explained in my edit summaries. You need to be a little more hesitant before you revert. Also, it's generally considered bad form to delete the comments on your talkpage. If you want, you can archive them with a link on your talkpage.
428:
to the 3RR. The lack of citations towards the content and the user's history of vandalism constituted persistent reversion. I tried to open discussion with him on the subject, but he refused to reply and continued to revert my rollbacks.
380:
prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
677:
I don't think you should stop because you're a pretty good user, but you don't have to edit Knowledge during the weekdays, but you could still Huggle on the weekends or non-school days such as Christmas break if you want.
660:
Editing Knowledge for vandalism is little more than a pastime for me- if I don't have time, I will stop for a while. I am currently in University and that doesn't leave a whole lot of time for anything else.
152:
I believe it was a Huggle error as I remember incorrectly reverting mistaken vandalism on another article, I might have hit that article in mistake. I see now that it is true vandalism, thanks for your undo.
97:
Noted and the warning has been removed from your talk page (if not done so already.) Also, it is complete within my rights to remove any and all comments (except for blocks of course) from my own talk page.
852:
Thanks, Speedy Deletions always confuse me, I find a lot of the categories overlap. I looked for the band on Google, came up with practically nothing, so I filed it under band. Thank you for the heads up.
765:
It came up flagged as 4 on Huggle for some reason. I see you removed it however- thank you. But the validity of an account called ilovetees creating an article about a small company is suspect in itself.
952:
that could even remotely be construed as a personal attack. If you had taken just a moment to look at the sources cited for the sentence, it would have been more than a little clear that the sources are
782:
Yeah, they probably do have a COI. I wonder if it has to do with that new-ish business warning I left for them. Does huggle read that as a level 3 maybe? It's actually a single issue warning.
948:
I'd like to kindly remind you that false accusations of personal attacks are as bad as a personal attack itself. There clearly is nothing (except in your rather inexplicable imagination) in
873:
carefully. If you can't find an appropriate speedy tag, it often means the page is not actually speediable, and you will have to consider PROD or AfD. There is good advice for taggers at
926:
Hi there. I mistakenly counted your citation needed edit as vandalism, but it has been reverted to your edit and your talk page has been cleared of warnings. Sorry about the mix-up.
624:
I'm currently using Huggle to pick up on Vandalism, so I might not see it if it doesn't show up in filtered edits. However I will check your talk page manually for you.
521:, have created an account on the ACC Account Creation Interface in order to better serve Knowledge by bringing more registered contributors in. Thanks for your time! 449:
warning, and should not be taken as truth. User copied and pasted their own warning from their own talk page and edited mine. Please disregard.
992: 959: 911: 83: 593: 386: 796:
Oh yes, you're right it would be level 3 since it didn't report. Odd. Programs aren't perfect. Thanks for the heads up.
827: 547: 538:
Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool
382: 377: 1039: 750:
A final and only warning is a little harsh for misplacing a hangon rationale on the article page, don't you think?
38: 404: 326: 290: 996: 963: 915: 87: 127: 869:
If you are going to do New Page Patrol, which is a very good and useful thing to do, it is worth reading
414: 907: 722: 686: 648: 611: 75: 270: 390: 322: 286: 234: 159: 101: 587: 368: 306: 1048: 1012: 980: 932: 859: 802: 772: 704: 667: 630: 562: 527: 501: 455: 435: 345: 47: 17: 640:
Thanks, and how come you took a couple of months off from Huggle before you came back to it?
886: 842: 492: 410: 249: 210: 174: 142: 874: 715: 679: 641: 604: 543: 79: 830:
just now wasn't the right one. However, in this case the band do not have an article, so
787: 755: 474: 373: 229: 154: 106: 362: 878: 870: 831: 823: 579: 221: 169:
No problem. There's more problems than that with that article anyway. Take it easy,
1007: 975: 927: 854: 797: 767: 699: 662: 625: 555: 522: 518: 496: 450: 430: 398: 394: 340: 1017: 1000: 985: 967: 937: 919: 890: 864: 846: 807: 791: 777: 759: 729: 709: 693: 672: 655: 635: 618: 564: 551: 532: 506: 477: 460: 440: 425: 418: 350: 330: 294: 253: 239: 214: 178: 164: 146: 120: 91: 1047:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
882: 838: 245: 206: 187: 170: 138: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
714:
Your welcome, but I hope to see you edit Knowledge again as soon as you can.
783: 751: 539: 393:
among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
495:. If you would like to speak to them, please make your edits more civil. 225: 99: 546:
to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join
603:
If someone vandalizes my talk page, will you please revert it?
197:
this IP, sternly and solemnly, they vandalized the page again,
1026: 385:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to 25: 339:
Thank you, I will continue to do my part. Keep on trucking!
826:
doesn't apply to albums and songs, so the tag you put on
220:
I do not. If you want to report an IP for vandalism, use
487:
i just want talk with Laurent1979 , why are you undo me
949: 202: 198: 194: 134: 397:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 389:to work towards wording and content that gains a 205:. Do you carry the big administrator's stick? 8: 542:. Before you do so, please read the tool's 285:I salute you for doing the best you can :) 224:or you can contact an administator such as 137:your removal of vandalism to this article? 74:The material I removed from the article on 372:according to the reverts you have made on 366:You currently appear to be engaged in an 304: 268: 244:Nor do I. I'll drop them a line, thanks. 401:. Please stop the disruption, otherwise 321:Keep up the good work and keep smiling 1045:Do not edit the contents of this page. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 473:Thanks for the Barnstar, it's fun XD 7: 698:Thanks, but my schedule is erratic. 445:This edit has been identified as an 279:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar 491:Your edits are personal attacks on 513:Confirmation edit for ACC creation 24: 315:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar 70:Christopher Hitchens and talkpage 1030: 828:Dark Ages (Embers and Ash album) 361: 305: 269: 29: 1: 387:discuss controversial changes 808:02:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 792:02:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 778:02:20, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 760:02:16, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 730:01:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 710:01:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 694:01:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 673:01:43, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 656:01:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 636:01:38, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 619:01:37, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 1081: 1018:00:00, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 599:Vandalism on my talk page 311: 275: 1001:23:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC) 986:22:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC) 968:20:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC) 938:19:04, 5 July 2011 (UTC) 920:19:01, 5 July 2011 (UTC) 891:18:03, 5 July 2011 (UTC) 865:17:53, 5 July 2011 (UTC) 847:17:51, 5 July 2011 (UTC) 594:05:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 565:14:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC) 533:05:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 507:18:27, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 478:23:08, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 461:03:06, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 441:02:26, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 419:22:14, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 351:21:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 331:21:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 295:21:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 254:19:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 240:18:22, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 215:18:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 179:05:36, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 165:05:30, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 147:05:28, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 121:03:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 92:03:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 548:#wikipedia-en-accounts 193:Hey Spider, after you 128:Woolooware High School 1043:of past discussions. 262:Award for being swell 42:of past discussions. 574:re: Crunchy barnstar 76:Christopher Hitchens 395:dispute resolution 1068: 1067: 1055: 1054: 1049:current talk page 944:False accusations 910:comment added by 592: 578:Thank you. :-) -- 383:three-revert rule 378:three-revert rule 336: 335: 300: 299: 78:was stolen from: 67: 66: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:The Red 1072: 1064: 1057: 1056: 1034: 1033: 1027: 1015: 1010: 983: 978: 935: 930: 922: 862: 857: 837:apply. Regards, 805: 800: 775: 770: 726: 719: 707: 702: 690: 683: 670: 665: 652: 645: 633: 628: 615: 608: 590: 586: 584: 560: 530: 525: 504: 499: 458: 453: 438: 433: 376:. Note that the 365: 348: 343: 309: 302: 301: 273: 266: 265: 237: 232: 162: 157: 118: 115: 112: 109: 104: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1080: 1079: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1060: 1031: 1013: 1008: 981: 976: 946: 933: 928: 905: 901: 860: 855: 820: 803: 798: 773: 768: 748: 724: 717: 705: 700: 688: 681: 668: 663: 650: 643: 631: 626: 613: 606: 601: 588: 580: 576: 556: 550:on irc and the 528: 523: 515: 502: 497: 485: 471: 456: 451: 436: 431: 399:page protection 359: 346: 341: 264: 235: 230: 191: 160: 155: 131: 116: 113: 110: 107: 102: 72: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1078: 1076: 1066: 1065: 1053: 1052: 1035: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 945: 942: 941: 940: 900: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 819: 818:Music speedies 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 747: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 600: 597: 575: 572: 570: 568: 567: 514: 511: 510: 509: 484: 481: 470: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 426:the exceptions 374:Super Audio CD 358: 357:Super Audio CD 355: 354: 353: 334: 333: 323:Mrpotatohead 2 318: 317: 312: 310: 298: 297: 287:Mrpotatohead 2 282: 281: 276: 274: 263: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 190: 185: 184: 183: 182: 181: 130: 125: 124: 123: 71: 68: 65: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1077: 1063: 1059: 1058: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1041: 1036: 1029: 1028: 1019: 1016: 1011: 1004: 1003: 1002: 998: 994: 993:75.177.156.16 989: 988: 987: 984: 979: 972: 971: 970: 969: 965: 961: 960:75.177.156.16 956: 951: 943: 939: 936: 931: 925: 924: 923: 921: 917: 913: 912:95.165.74.240 909: 899:Fact template 898: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 867: 866: 863: 858: 851: 850: 849: 848: 844: 840: 836: 833: 829: 825: 817: 809: 806: 801: 795: 794: 793: 789: 785: 781: 780: 779: 776: 771: 764: 763: 762: 761: 757: 753: 745: 731: 728: 727: 721: 720: 713: 712: 711: 708: 703: 697: 696: 695: 692: 691: 685: 684: 676: 675: 674: 671: 666: 659: 658: 657: 654: 653: 647: 646: 639: 638: 637: 634: 629: 623: 622: 621: 620: 617: 616: 610: 609: 598: 596: 595: 591: 585: 583: 573: 571: 566: 563: 561: 559: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 536: 535: 534: 531: 526: 520: 512: 508: 505: 500: 494: 490: 489: 488: 482: 480: 479: 476: 468: 462: 459: 454: 448: 444: 443: 442: 439: 434: 427: 423: 422: 421: 420: 416: 412: 408: 406: 400: 396: 392: 388: 384: 379: 375: 371: 370: 364: 356: 352: 349: 344: 338: 337: 332: 328: 324: 320: 319: 316: 313: 308: 303: 296: 292: 288: 284: 283: 280: 277: 272: 267: 261: 255: 251: 247: 243: 242: 241: 238: 233: 227: 223: 219: 218: 217: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 189: 186: 180: 176: 172: 168: 167: 166: 163: 158: 151: 150: 149: 148: 144: 140: 136: 129: 126: 122: 119: 105: 100: 96: 95: 94: 93: 89: 85: 84:96.241.20.150 80: 77: 69: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1061: 1044: 1038: 954: 947: 906:— Preceding 902: 834: 821: 749: 723: 716: 687: 680: 649: 642: 612: 605: 602: 581: 577: 569: 557: 552:mailing list 516: 486: 472: 446: 407:from editing 402: 367: 360: 314: 278: 192: 133:Why did you 132: 73: 60: 43: 37: 1037:This is an 424:Please see 411:Binksternet 403:you may be 188:Danny Gokey 36:This is an 746:Wicky Tees 226:Mentifisto 1062:Archive 1 955:religious 950:this edit 832:WP:CSD#A9 824:WP:CSD#A7 493:that user 475:David0811 391:consensus 231:prospider 156:prospider 61:Archive 1 908:unsigned 875:WP:10CSD 589:MindMeld 447:imposter 369:edit war 1040:archive 1009:The Red 977:The Red 929:The Red 856:The Red 799:The Red 769:The Red 701:The Red 664:The Red 627:The Red 582:T'Shael 558:Prodego 524:The Red 519:The Red 498:The Red 452:The Red 432:The Red 405:blocked 342:The Red 39:archive 883:JohnCD 879:WP:A7M 871:WP:CSD 839:JohnCD 246:Drmies 222:WP:AIV 207:Drmies 195:warned 171:Drmies 139:Drmies 117:pider 718:WAYNE 682:WAYNE 644:WAYNE 607:WAYNE 544:guide 16:< 997:talk 964:talk 916:talk 887:talk 877:and 843:talk 835:does 822:Hi. 788:talk 784:Gigs 756:talk 752:Gigs 725:SLAM 689:SLAM 651:SLAM 614:SLAM 540:here 415:talk 327:talk 291:talk 250:talk 211:talk 203:here 201:and 199:here 175:talk 143:talk 135:undo 103:talk 88:talk 517:I, 409:. 999:) 966:) 918:) 889:) 881:. 845:) 790:) 758:) 483:hi 469:xD 417:) 329:) 293:) 252:) 228:. 213:) 177:) 145:) 111:ro 90:) 1051:. 1014:╬ 995:( 982:╬ 962:( 934:╬ 914:( 885:( 861:╬ 841:( 804:╬ 786:( 774:╬ 754:( 706:╬ 669:╬ 632:╬ 529:╬ 503:╬ 457:╬ 437:╬ 413:( 347:╬ 325:( 289:( 248:( 236:‡ 209:( 173:( 161:‡ 141:( 114:S 108:P 86:( 50:.

Index

User talk:The Red
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
Christopher Hitchens

96.241.20.150
talk
03:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

talk
ProSpider
03:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Woolooware High School
undo
Drmies
talk
05:28, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
prospider

05:30, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Drmies
talk
05:36, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Danny Gokey
warned
here
here
Drmies
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.