User talk:Totie/Archive 1

2026:. The guiding principle is that Knowledge should use established names, that is, names that are commonly used in English. First Chamber and Second Chamber are literal translations that English speakers may not be familiar with. In this case we do have official names as well as secondary English sources. What you can see there is that either the official names are used (Tweede Kamer), the official English names (House of Representatives) or descriptive terms (like lower/upper chamber or house). Translations may certainly be added, but ultimately I think that the literal translation is not appropriate, given the more common names that are available.–Totie ( 1303:«I've overwritten your changes to the article. It said: "After issues from 2012 campaign (such as the the debt and Bygmalion), the mid term meeting made the UMP brand disappear to use the new controversial brand Les Républicains on the 28th May till 30th May 2015." I didn't entirely understand what you meant and I couldn't find more information in your sources. They didn't say anything about these 2012 issues you mentioned and neither was anything mentioned on the (temporary) use of the Les Républicains name.— 588: 31: 562: 2796: 2744: 2692: 2491: 1201: 1090: 999: 824: 689: 617: 393: 2545: 2420: 2253: 2215: 1661: 1586: 2813:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2761:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2709:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2508:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 1751:

the same cannot be said about Discover, regardless whether it is a major credit card provider. What you did was specifically highlight that Discover was announced without providing any other context that could be of relevance to readers. The advertising claim has been debated to exhaustion on the talk page, you ought to have a look there first.–

1220:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2368: 2167:

Emphatically disagreeing with this summarises it neatly. I see that you went ahead and made your changes and completely disregarded the consistency with other Apple device articles. Given our previous disagreements, I will not add anything to this discussion, aside from admitting that my edit summary

1734:

I added that discover now processes apple pay as of ios 9 and september 2015 and you are reverting me stating "We don’t mention specific providers for a reason." The article clearly mentions amex mastercard and visa, and not only that the giant main photo mentions royal bank of scotland and natwest,

1750:

The other credit card providers are mentioned in a different context: to point out the compatibility with pre-existing NFC-based hardware (see introduction) and to illustrate what happened behind the scenes before the official announcement (see history). That goes beyond mere advertising. However,

1999:

Hi! My edits were based upon literal Dutch translations of the name, but I do see how the Dutch Government used the previous names in English. Surely a way forward ought to be to use both names, making a distinction between official and common names? Also, in relation the a potential page move it

2134:

For hardware instances, however, we occasionally resort to deletion on the grounds of metonymy: As long as we are talking about one or more devices, "The iPhone device" becomes "the iPhone" and "iPhone devices" become "iPhones" (plural). But that does not happen when we are talking about brand

2432:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2557:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2102:

specific iPhone SE someone may possess. But Totie stated that this was "marketing jargon", and later elaborated by saying that "Noun or noun phrases should have a determiner in English grammar. Apple likes to drop determiners to present their products names as pronouns"

1735:

starbucks and others. Discover is the fourth major credit card processing system in america (visa,mastercard,amex and discover), it is no different then listing amex who processes thier own cards. and it deserves to have a mention or the article is incomplete. -

2265:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

575:! Thank you for your generous offer to help contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a European Union Project Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the 1408:. Of course the other reason was also valid; my point is simply that it takes somewhat longer to verify that a db-move is appropriate than to verify the db-g7, so administrators are more likely to do the G7 because it's quicker and easier. 2635:

and sign up as a member. There's something for everyone to do, such as welcoming, sourcing, writing, copy editing, gnoming, proofreading, or feedback — but no pressure. Do what you do, but let's coordinate and stay in touch.

1832:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2585: 2460: 2293: 1343:«the 28th May till 30th May 2015.» is the date of the meeting which make the UMP brand to disappear (the two first day of the meeting) and when the «Les Républicains» brand become to be used (the third day). 74:

I guess you were right about "I Gotta Feeling" instead of "I Gotta Feelin'". It is based on the tracklisting instead of the single artwork. And it's correct now that you got the official single cover.

2569:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2444:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2277:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1481:, I won't be making edits to the article directly, but I'd like to discuss my proposed changes with interested editors. Let me know if there's anyone else you think might be interested, too. Thanks! 2326:

Hello, Totie. Could you help me move the file details of the homescreen screenshot from here to Commons? A user supposedly uploaded the image to Commons with CC BY-SA 4.0, claiming that

463: 1037:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 727:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 655:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 431:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 1935: 500: 1473:, and since you're interested in legislation, I thought I'd reach out. Are you interested in taking a look at the changes I've offered? You can read them and give me feedback 1354: 1033:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

723:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

651:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

427:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1474: 1398:(there were two just edits in its history: you creating it, and you asking for deletion), so it would have been simpler if you'd just requested an author-type deletion, 2625:

You've been identified either as a previous member of the project, an active editor on Apple related pages, a bearer of Apple related userboxes, or just a hoopy frood.

1978:

on the Google template. I had a long day and never even noticed my mistake until now. I copied and paste the layout and totally forgot to change the link field.

1690: 1465: 180: 2168:

was indeed poorly written. I still hold on to the opinion that this is Apple’s marketing speak and it is sneaking into these articles at too many places.–Totie (

1500:

Sorry for my late response. I am not familiar with the subject-matter, so at most I could do a wee check to see whether the sources you provided are reliable.--

1117: