User talk:TrevelyanL85A2

4442:"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Knowledge. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at 2761:

of link between them on-wiki, but equally it would be imperative that you privately communicate the link to AC and assure them that you intend to respect the restrictions applicable to your current name while they are in force. Assure AC that you reject the imputations of proxy-editing in the past and give them your assurance that you will be sure not to do anything of the kind in the future. Make it clear that you would regard continued oppositional research and linking your old and new usernames on the pretext of finding or holding evidence on-wiki as harassment. Good luck.

4431:. There's a new bonus prize of $ 200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! 2867:, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as 3956: 3801: 2906: 21: 2678:) is indefinitely banned from editing and/or discussing the topic of Race and Intelligence on any page of Knowledge, including user talk pages, or from participating in any discussion concerning the conduct of editors who have worked in the topic. This editor may however within reason participate in dispute resolution and noticeboard discussions if their own conduct has been mentioned. 2662:) is indefinitely banned from editing and/or discussing the topic of Race and Intelligence on any page of Knowledge, including user talk pages, or from participating in any discussion concerning the conduct of editors who have worked in the topic. This editor may however within reason participate in dispute resolution and noticeboard discussions if their own conduct has been mentioned. 2398: 2819: 4393:. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like 1777: 1079: 1851: 1683: 1566: 1466: 1366: 1266: 1166: 958: 858: 2646:) are site-banned from Knowledge for a period of no less than one year. After one year has elapsed, a request may be made for the ban to be lifted. Any such request must address all the circumstances which lead to this ban being imposed and demonstrate an understanding of and intention to refrain from similar actions in the future. 4161:. Editors have also expressed some concern about your past propensity for wiki-litigation, I would strongly urge you to avoid controversial areas beyond just those you are topic banned from, and only pursue enforcement action in the most unambiguous cases, if at all. If it becomes an issue again, you could end up reblocked. 195: 4397:. For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current 3532:

I'd prefer if the posts didn't have to be removed at all. I've always felt anyone should be able to post in my user talk, even socks, as long as they are civil and don't violate any policies. If ArbCom rules that isn't allowed anymore, as Newyorkbrad suggested, then I might remove the posts myself.

2233:

TrevelyanL85A2 didn't bring me into this; you did, as soon as you mentioned my name. I can't believe you're still bringing me up on Knowledge after all this time. Over the past year or so I've put a lot of effort into contributing my skills and knowledge to other areas of Knowledge, and in developing

2072:

Then you are mistaken. From what I was told by Shell Kinney, ArbCom decided that problems with your editing would be dropped, provided your account (and that of Sightwatcher) stayed clear of articles connected with the topic bans of Ferhago the Assassin and Captain Occam. That does not seem to be the

3886:

It's been over a year since I was blocked, so the arbitration enforcement part of my block is over, and I'd like to be able to edit articles again. Circumstances have recently changed so that there isn't a danger I'll violate my interaction ban anymore. If possible I would like my unblock request to

3337:

I appreciate the advice you've given me throughout this situation, but I also want it to be resolved. And I think that just restricting all of us from restoring Echigo Mole's posts in our user talk won't do anything to address the underlying problem. Mathsci's attention to me has completely sapped

2458:, where your name has already been mentioned. I notice that you have not edited on the topic of race and intelligence since 3 January, which is why I have not proposed any sanctions. It is probably best if you avoid the topic area, since your acquaintance with Ferahgo would otherwise raise concerns. 2286:

is rife with meatpuppets and sockpuppets, I doubt very much that any administrators or arbitrators would be sympathetic with measures which you (and previously Captain Occam) seek to put in place, the only result of which would be to make it easier for sockpuppetry and meatpuppetry to go undetected.

4500:

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and

4041:

My block was recently discussed on the admin IRC channel, and I was told to use the unblock template in my user talk. It's been over a year since I was blocked, so I'm no longer under an arbitration enforcement block. If unblocked, I promise to abide by my interaction ban, and to not participate in

3618:

about the proceedings of the Arbitration Committee in a non-partisan manner. Please review the draft article, and, if you have any concerns, feel free to leave them on the talkpage (transcluded in the Comments section directly below the main body of text), where they will be read by a member of the

3576:

3364:

topic-banned from R&I. You're not supposed to be restoring these posts. To be honest, you're lucky you weren't blocked for violating your topic-ban. The only thing that I have issue with this affair is why MathSci can't simply notify an uninvolved party to remove them. It seems to me that a

2760:

but chose not to take it, and everything predicted in that message has happended. Anyway, I suggest that you consider simply dropping your current user name, adopting a new one with no references to external identities and continue editing as before under the new name. You should not make any kind

2276:

I received several emails from Shell Kinney, which you are not privy to, which confirmed the identification of TrevelyanL85A2. It does not seem like a very wise move for you to be lobbying for your confirmed friends to edit in the exact area of your topic ban. I can see no difference at all between

4401:

which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every

3323:

I'd like to see how Roger Davies responds to what I said first. If he thinks my statement is unhelpful, I'll remove part of it as you suggested. However, I think I can read some things between the lines of his question that go beyond what he asked directly. His question to you suggests that he

1648:

Hi TrevlyanL85A2. ArbCom is aware that you are a real life friend of Ferahgo-the-Assassin. By editing in the area of the topic ban imposed on her and Captain Occam in the above case, your editing will probably be viewed as a means for them to bypass their ban through others. Another editor in the

4475:. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at 2259:

Please, Mathsci. You need to make an effort to assume good faith here and just let it drop so we can all move on. I really don't want to, but if you aren't willing to agree to stop (or if you just ignore this request), I will be forced to take the matter back to an amendment and push for that

3304:

Understanding that you were asked to comment, I feel you should all the same remove from your statement any allegations that are not strictly limited to what was asked by Roger. Specifically, I think everything after "I would object much less if it were done by an uninvolved admin" should be

2234:

a history here that is separate and distinct from the topic that unfortunately caused us to cross paths. There is absolutely no reason for you to continue bringing up my name on Knowledge, and treating other editors poorly because you associate them with me. This absolutely needs to stop.

4589:

is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier!

3177:

Just letting you know that, regardless of the outcome at AE, I do intend to make a request regarding your situation and so you should avoid the temptation to do it yourself. Gonna be occupied for the next week though, so I will not be doing anything major like that until

4563:

is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks,

2281:

both when a topic ban was proposed for Miradre and later during the subsequent appeal. That was an immense waste of time. I cannot see where good faith enters here: in this particular case TrevelyanL85A2 self identifies as a friend of yours. Since the area covered by

1623: 1531: 1431: 1331: 1231: 1120: 1023: 923: 3382:

Actually, of the comments in question, only one directly pertained to R&I and it was a suggestion for a fully legit clean start following the topic ban. I do not think Trev's restoration of those comments in any way constituted a violation of the topic

2485:

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a

3658:, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the 2036:, that the same topic ban currently applied to Captain Occam and your real life friend Ferahgo the Assassin will be applied to you. More than that, in fact: you could possibly all be community banned for a long term campaign of willful deception. Thanks, 3338:

my energy to edit articles here, and I don't think restricting us from restoring Echigo Mole's posts will solve that. I don't know if I can get the arbitrators to understand the part of the problem for which Mathsci is responsible, but I want to try.--

1916: 1748: 2260:

interaction ban. If you can't voluntarily let this go, I doubt that anything short of an interaction ban will put a stop to this. Can you answer me simply: will you please leave this alone and stop mentioning me & Occam on Knowledge? -

2477:

Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require

630:

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

604:

578:

504:

478:

452:

426:

400:

313:

2991:

Reason given below. This is an AE block, so I'd like my appeal to please be posted at AE for review. If possible, I'd like the two other editors involved in the dispute that led to my block (Nyttend and Collect) to also be notified.

795:

765:

706:

676:

4639: 2498: 2494: 3744:

Just letting you know that I received your recent e-mail. I do think that you didn't need to notify me and get yourself blocked over that matter as I would have noticed the discussion eventually anyway, though your concern is

4064:

Purely procedural, and this shouldn't be construed as an attempt to reject your request. Since this is being discussed, the request shouldn't be accepted here and shouldn't be rejected here, and removing your talk page from

1649:

same situation is SightWatcher. In both cases, your real life identities are known by arbitrators. The simplest thing is for you to stop editing in that area. Appearing out of the blue with a campaign against a single editor

600: 761: 672: 396: 3253:

your response to a question. For your own sake, and to minimize disruption, I suggest that you limit your response strictly to what is being asked of you directly by the Arb. It is better if you stay out of the unfolding

702: 626: 309: 3207:

Before I proceed, I would like to know if you object to me sending the e-mail to members of ArbCom should it be raised as an issue. Allowing me to clear up what was sent to me in case I am accused of proxying would be

1285: 1097: 977: 574: 4502: 1185: 877: 791: 448: 422: 74: 2433:. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the 4477: 1309: 1109: 1001: 500: 1485: 1385: 1209: 901: 474: 2087:

Nor is it a particularly good idea to bring your friend Ferahgo the Assassin into this, as you have just done. Your editing should simply stay completely outside the area of their topic ban. As you will see on

4558: 4535: 4507: 4303: 4275: 3653: 1886: 1870: 1718: 1702: 1293: 1105: 985: 2032:. A former arbitrator, Shell Kinney, has already verified this a long while back. If you continue editing tendentiously in this topic area (for example, your refusal to use sources), it is highly likely, per 4635: 4611: 4443: 1585: 1509: 1409: 1301: 1193: 1101: 993: 885: 735: 370: 341: 2889: 2724: 2705: 2589: 2572: 1201: 893: 1601: 1493: 1393: 553: 529: 2879:. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee." 4349: 4236: 1878: 1710: 1501: 1401: 3368:

How about this for a novel solution? The next time a banned editor posts something to your page, why not delete it yourself with an edit summary of "Sorry, I'm topic-banned from discussing this"?

1593: 652:

Actually, this article is about a specific form of magic which is spelled with a terminal 'k'. Please don't remove the 'k' again. Now that you have been informed, that would have to be considered

3112: 2505: 2487: 2291:, there was no history of serial sockpuppetry in the topic area (apart from the easily recognizable sockpuppets of Muntuwandi). Since the close of that case, things have been very different. 1894: 1726: 4158:, I have unblocked you. Please remember that all previously imposed editing restrictions remain in force, including your topic ban, and restrictions on interaction with certain other editors 4323: 4132: 3569: 3231: 2716: 4585: 2434: 147:. It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it. Even then, I typically ask if anyone minds that I make a change. Very often they do! ;-) 4538:

is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks,

827:

and vote for RIT! (Don't forget to update the Vote Counter manually) There have been several cries in the past for an RIT Wikiproject - now's your chance to prove that RIT is big enough!

4615: 3910: 2440: 2414: 2208:

And finally, less than two weeks ago you were formally warned by Jclemens to stop bringing up off-wiki evidence against other editors. You are clearly disregarding all of this advice.

2508:. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way. 1945:

I realize you're probably aware of this as you know editors who've been topic banned, but if you're interested in actively editing in the topic area, you might wish to review the

4674: 3234:

to amend the ARBR&I case regarding the restriction against you. Given the nature of the restriction, I would ask that you avoid commenting unless it is requested by an Arb.--

3138:, and further appeals (if any) can be submitted via email to unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org, to the Arbitration Committee via email, or to an individual Arbitrator via email. 4669: 4428: 4421: 1124: 260: 3324:

thinks Mathsci has no responsibility for this situation, and all that's going on is our fault. The new suggestion from Newyorkbrad indicates the same attitude, that everyone

2277:

the edits of Mikemikev and TrevelyanL85A2. Both accounts are breaking topic bans set by ArbCom. Captain Occam already has spent a considerable amount of time wikilawyering on

4512: 4501:

processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available

4398: 4299: 4271: 3679: 3659: 1920: 1752: 1619: 1527: 1427: 1327: 1227: 1019: 919: 731: 549: 525: 366: 337: 289: 3768:

and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

256: 4390: 1999: 252: 175:

I believe you were refering to the userboxes (the ones that said "This user wastes too musch time on wikipedia" et al). You can get all the low down on userboxes right

4643: 4382: 274: 3441:

Mathsci's removing of the posts isn't the only thing I object to. I also object to the other ways he's been trying to provoke me, that Devil's Advocate described

2482:, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it. 3665: 1912: 1744: 3392: 2114: 3263: 3217: 3202: 2784:. You may review and comment, as you may "within reason participate in dispute resolution and noticeboard discussions if their own conduct has been mentioned." 3887:

be handled by a member of ArbCom, because they will be familiar with the circumstances under which I was blocked, and will understand what's different now. --

4409: 4103:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

3947:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

3909:

Procedural decline: in order to ensure that your appeal is considered by a member of Arbcom, your best course is to email the Ban Appeals Subcommittee - see

3049:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2876: 3479:

Perhaps the Arbs will consider an interaction ban, I don't know. But what I am saying is that there are two very easy ways to resolve at least this issue:

3996: 3841: 3075: 2946: 2349: 1850: 1682: 1565: 1465: 1365: 1265: 1165: 1078: 957: 857: 241: 4634:. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at 2799: 2781: 2629: 2444: 1993: 4402:

country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --

3314: 1801: 340:

selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please

4042:

race and intelligence articles anymore. I'd like to get back to editing the other topics that I used to edit, like video games and military topics.

2203:

From my understanding, the only reason you weren't given an interaction ban is because the arbitrators were confident you would follow their advice.

528:

selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please

734:

selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please

824: 131: 2108: 50:, a new wikipedia user. I came to understand that you have an interest in Computer and related topics. I am working on a few articles related to 4112: 3611: 3411:

Well, whatever the violation is, the point is that if TrevelyanL85A2 deletes the posts himself, everyone can avoid a lot of unnecessary drama.

4295: 4267: 3675: 3645: 1858: 1690: 1573: 1473: 1373: 1273: 1173: 1088: 965: 865: 281: 267: 4394: 4651: 4614:

begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the

4453: 3991: 3836: 3069: 2941: 2762: 2675: 1820: 4326:

and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the

3187: 4322:

You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at

4088: 3932: 3754: 3731: 3243: 3034: 2843: 2643: 2553: 1809: 4511:

by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the

1967:

Thank you for the notification. I understand this is a contentious topic area and I hope to work constructively with you and others. --

552:

election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please

369:

election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please

35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 2659: 2017: 820: 292:, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! 205:! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Knowledge's coverage of topics related to military history. 4159: 3610:

Hello. This is an automated message to tell you that, as it stands, you are set to be mentioned in this week's Arbitration Report (

3568:

Hello. This is an automated message to tell you that, as it stands, you are set to be mentioned in this week's Arbitration Report (

1046:

You should just be able to add a {{-}} between each section heading to break it. As for my formatting, feel free to steal it! :) --

2005: 231: 220: 4647: 4449: 3750: 3693: 3499: 3416: 3388: 3373: 3310: 3259: 3239: 3213: 3198: 3183: 2406: 3130:

As this page has been the subject of edit-warring over a banned editor's comments, I've protected it for the remainder of the

2875:). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the 2596:

The arbitration review of the Race and Intelligence case has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above.

2132: 4386: 3772: 3765: 3728: 2623: 2265: 1987: 85: 4274:

election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the

107:. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: 4066: 2613: 2120: 213: 27: 4010: 3855: 3093: 2960: 100: 4403: 4327: 3778: 2102: 2092:, it is now properly acknowledged that the issues of disruptive sockpuppetry and meatpuppetry are taken seriously in 3746: 3384: 3306: 3255: 3235: 3209: 3194: 3179: 2184:

February, Roger Davies asked you to leave it to uninvolved editors to bring it up if someone's editing is a problem.

3968:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

3813:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

3495: 3412: 3369: 3081: 2918:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

2430: 1981:

You have left links on your user page which identify you unambiguously in real life. You are a real life friend of

4350:

Knowledge talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence#Amendment request: Race and intelligence (May 2016)

3692:

Hello. Your topic ban prohibits you from discussing me or my edits on wikipedia. You did so today in a posting on

3347: 4213: 3969: 3814: 2919: 2830: 2619: 2261: 1982: 4619: 3963: 3808: 2913: 2766: 2410: 1776: 3723:, I have imposed an indefinite block. The first year of this counts as Arbcom enforcment under the existing 2637: 2546: 2501:

will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

1793: 2757:

Some advice you may like to consider in the aftermath of the R&I review. FtA was given similar advice

2421:. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the 2143:

is now indefinitely blocked. Why is your editing in this area any less problematic than that of Mikemikev?

284:

for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.

125: 4595: 4569: 4543: 4520: 4486: 3790: 2839: 2653: 2535: 2422: 138: 111: 2097: 4631: 2825: 2418: 2329: 1790:

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.

4642:(examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the 180: 165: 104: 4362: 4251: 3533:

I don't know. I don't like removing something that I actually think should be able to stay there.--

2803: 2693: 2515: 2463: 3490:

One of you needs to be the bigger person. There seems to be a lot of drama for a situation that is

4324:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Race and intelligence

4194: 4043: 3974: 3888: 3819: 3766:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests#Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_Race_and_intelligence

3724: 3635: 3623:

factual errors (making sure to note such changes in the comments section). Thank you. On behalf of

3593: 3581:

factual errors (making sure to note such changes in the comments section). Thank you. On behalf of

3534: 3446: 3339: 3294: 3058: 2993: 2924: 2789: 2743: 2665: 2426: 2374: 2288: 2283: 2093: 2059: 2029: 1968: 1946: 1939: 1642: 559: 293: 151: 144: 121: 4167: 3019: 2633: 2539: 2344: 1928: 1760: 1631: 1539: 1439: 1339: 1239: 1132: 1031: 931: 804: 774: 715: 685: 657: 81: 4591: 4565: 4539: 4516: 4482: 4468: 4181: 4074: 3786: 3705: 3279: 3163: 2649: 2607: 2576: 2378: 2354: 2347:" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so 2296: 2148: 2078: 2041: 1657: 832: 329: 202: 176: 4097: 3941: 3918: 3043: 3014:

Procedural decline as this wasn't really an unblock request. Your appeal has been copied to

2575:

and that there are findings and remedies concerning you, to which you may wish to respond.

2523: 2479: 2362: 2325: 1957: 1819:

community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for

1618:

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

1054: 653: 3764:

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at

3639: 3328:

Mathsci is the problem, because of us restoring Echigo Mole's posts in our user talk pages.

4353: 4246: 2687: 2511: 2459: 2387: 745: 3597: 1797: 3631: 3589: 3290: 2785: 2739: 2033: 978:

From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report

636: 610: 584: 510: 484: 458: 432: 406: 380: 351: 319: 117: 71:

You may also drop your valuable suggestions on other related articles on my talk page.

3154:

Hello. You have broken your topic ban in a very serious way. I have filed a report at

4663: 4627: 4623: 4334: 4309: 4281: 4220: 4162: 4136: 4116: 3140: 3116: 2894: 2872: 2848: 2366: 1924: 1816: 1756: 1627: 1535: 1435: 1335: 1235: 1128: 1027: 927: 800: 770: 711: 681: 535: 77: 47: 2729:

Mathsci has engaged in borderline personal attacks and frequent battleground conduct

157:

Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask - Just

4155: 4070: 3720: 3701: 3697: 3686: 3159: 3155: 3135: 3131: 3108: 3015: 2868: 2603: 2493:

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from

2455: 2321: 2292: 2278: 2144: 2096:. And it never seems to stop. For example Mikemikev just this week. His sockpuppet 2089: 2074: 2037: 1653: 1526: