User talk:Walkerma/Archive3

215:

important enough (and much of chemistry is) then each deserves its own personality to shine out. I think that's why I like to show pictures, too. Also there is the long term aspect- I accept that right now this page is fine for where we are now, but in 5, 10 years, people are going to want to find out specifics on individual compounds, and they will expect to find them on Knowledge. We probably need a hierarchy of both general pages and specific pages, of pages on

31: 227:, so despite the immense importance of chem & the chem industry to the world our subject is often seen as too difficult for ordinary people, or obscure- but I think Knowledge is big enough to accomodate individual pages. (I think for PCl3 there is probably enough to write a book!) I do accept that many compounds will never warrant their own pages- I took out lots of these when I wrote 307:, this was half-done about a month ago, I wanted to get it finished off and uploaded. I'd appreciate if Physchim62 and Henry can clean up the page as needed. The Chem. Commun. reference you include too on non-existence of PI5, in case you don't have access to it (I have it on my desk), says that PI4+ I− is very endothermic, most likely PI3 + I2 based on thermodynamics. They made PI4+ AsF6−. 1351:. I had thought that the server CPU usage for such things would be minimal, am I wrong? Many of my carriage returns are in order to make the table clearer (IMHO) to read- though I think in general these tables are horrendously "user-unfriendly"! So, can you give some guidance on making the code clear and comprehensible yet compact and efficient? Thanks, 1051:

Yes, I had considered the V2O5 page complete other than the supplementary page. I realise that I have included information on vanadates too, but that seemed appropriate since it is what happens when you play with aqueous solutions/slurries of V2O5 (as with MoO3, I believe). Please bring to light any

713:

Finally, sorry for not submitting comments for the new chembox: I didn't realise the discussion was going on! Never mind, I suggest that the new version be "road-tested", and reviewed in a couple of months' time. Personally, I think I shall be sticking to {{chembox simple inorganic}} for my articles,

593:

Well done, Wim! I thought you might find the Potsdam connection amusing- it's only a little town in the middle of nowhere, but we have two colleges, so practically all of my neighbours have PhDs! The Clarkson chemistry department is mainly known for its colloid chemistry, but Vaska certainly made his

214:

Thanks for letting me know your name, Henry! Regarding general vs. specific pages, I have put comments on the individual pages, but I will give a more general response here. Fundamentally this is almost a philosophical question- and I see each compound like a character in a play, and if the play is

863:

has a Ph.D. in Chemistry. Rumour has it that it was only awarded only the understanding that she would never use it professionally (she studied Law afterwards, but never practised that either). She is also (as PM) supposed to have stopped a draft directive that would have forbidden the production of

851:

territory, where she was usually called by less polite names). I could be wrong, though. One interesting trivia point- although she rarely gave TV interviews, she did do a special on the chemistry of cooking while she was prime minister! I suspect she wanted to soften her image, by showing herself

1291:

Thanks for the feedback, please feel free to add more modern material, many of my sources are older than I am! I have fixed the blooper, thanks for spotting that. Regarding the NFPA diamonds, I don't have numbers to hand to insert into these- do you get them off MSDS sheets or what? Regarding the

1191:

article. I have one minor comment, and I hope this isn't too nit-picky. I think the literature reference is very important to include, but not in the image itself. I would consider the literature reference to be "metadata", which should be included in the image description. I wouldn't change any

1105:

Don't expect a novel-length article on PuO2, there's just not enough that's worth saying about it. MoO3 is another story! This will need a project to link through to articles on the polyoxomolybdates and on its analytical uses (at the very least). MoS2 looks promising as a candidate to take through

727:

Thanks for pointing out the connection- I tend to think of PX3 P(OR)3 as simple compounds that a chemist might use for organic or inorganic transformations, just like all of the other halides I've worked on. I'd thought of those organophosphorus compounds as being a long way from PF3- I'm naive, I

120:

Wim, I like the cleaned up version. I suspect it may be better to omit the reference to the HCl article in the participants section, especially as there is no reference to the featured article on Titanium (Put refs to both of these somewhere else?). I like the new chemistry "icon", even though the

1346:

Wim, can you give us some general guidance on whitespace etc? Maybe this should go in the style guide or the infobox page? I did in fact the same thing with menthol, making a wide table then adding in a few breaks as needed to narrow down the page (I do most of my "edits" using preview mode). I

297:

page looks GREAT! That looks like exactly what I had in mind when I was talking about family pages. This really enhances the quality of the Knowledge compound pages, if we have pages like this as a layer above the individual compounds. I look forward to seeing things like PuO2 and MoO3 going up,

236:

As for "family" pages (as I think of pages like this) I think they do fulfil a useful role in the hierarchy, and I for one am really glad that you have taken on many of the hugely important commodity chemicals like the xylenes and the phthalic acids. So I think I would like to keep such pages in

1496:

Wim, I did the fluoride, chloride and bromide all at the same time to save time, and I realised that this mistake was a result of my cutting & pasting- sorry about that! As I see it, SbF3 is too remote from PBr3 as it differs in two ways, not just one, and its not as if there is nothing else

1365:

is a line break, for HTML it is just white space, thus to be ignored. Making an empty line in Wiki-editing is therefore two line breaks, and in HTML that is still ignorable whitespace. And Wiki does odd things with two line breaks, e.g., it inserts 1.5 empty line on what you see on your webpage

664:

Great question, I had PF3 behind me when I stumbled across your list page, I should have spotted that! Did those metal complex pages come from the French Knowledge? I've been surprised how little chemistry is in the French version as yet, compared to the German & English ones, why is that?

502:

page on my watchlist, and several times a week there is some drunk who adds something like "Uses- You can get out of your mind by drinking it." Also, there can be so much safety info there is a danger that the page switches from being an encyclopedia entry into being an amateur MSDS page. I am

1267:

article, and it looks really great. You are quite a prolific wikipedian. I like your image of the synthesis of menthol from myrcene. Hopefully, you have it saved somewhere, because you're missing a double bond in the top right structure. I don't mean to be nit-picky, but I thought I should

1055:

The V2O5 page is good, but needs some copy-editing (is on my 2DO list...) I am fine with your coverage of vanadates, as the polyoxovanadates formed at intermediate pH values deserve a page of their own. Overall, I think you have struck a very good balance between pure chemistry and industrial

1199:

OK, I will follow your suggestion in future. I may redo the Schlosser image anyway, since I inadvertently wrote the "bold" in wikicode instead of real bold- a sure sign I'm spending too much time on Knowledge! I put the ref in because I can imagine these images (being PD) getting copied and

121:

cynic in me asks why a Dean-Stark trap is attached to an Erlenmeyer flask! It's so much more interesting than the standard old benzene ring and so on. When I get some time (2 exams to give this week!) I will try to start adding in the template to the pages I've worked on. Please see my

349:

stublet, and thanks for the details on PI5. You guessed correctly that I didn't have the ChemComm in front of me, but the idea that PI5 is unstable with respect to reductive elimination of I2 seems eminently believable, especially if it's someone like Thomas Klapötke who's saying it!

983:. At the time, I thought it would be difficult to come up with enough material to make full articles for individual compounds. I admit that it is a rather unfinished hodge-podge of facts and pics. I have a few more things to add to it and then I would like to leave it to 520:

compound per element. Things like RhCl3 and Vaska's complex therefore help us reach our goal, but something like AlBr3 doesn't. Of course it doesn't stop people writing several pages on one element (e.g. P halides), but that's separate from the project goal. Cheers,

1001:

I am also in the process of writing a separate article covering polyphosphoric acid and polyphospates. I have already started this article offline. So if somebody wants to write about this topic, please let me know, so there's not a duplication of effort.

357:, I deliberately left this one to you as its seems that its main interest is as a reagent in organic chemistry. It might be worth checking the claim in Greenwood & Earnshaw that it is useful as a mild oxygen-atom acceptor. 22:50, 22 May 2005 (UTC) 497:

Regarding the safety info, please see the comments & proposed changes to the standard table. One problem with Knowledge is that it is not a legally reliable source for safety info, so personally I would never dream of using it. I have the

1021:

article finished yet? I have looked at it and see some potential "inconsistencies" in it. However, if you're not finished with it yet, I would rather wait for you to finish before I make further corrections. I also noticed a red link to

991:

want to work on it ??) to develop this article/information as he sees fit, including perhaps dividing the material into separate articles, or merging/expanding it into a general phosporus halide article with links to important individual

852:

as intelligent yet wearing an apron, baking cakes like a good housewife. The Knowledge page says she worked as a chemist at an ice cream company. I'm not aware of any other post-1945 UK PMs that were PhD chemists.

809:

Although I know by heart that Margret Thatcher did do chemistry before her political career, but whether she has a PhD? If so, do I have to go to Arras to collect a bottle of champagne? Easier than Potsdam :).

152:, which I will probably have done by tomorrow. When writing it I found it was so easy to do the other PX3 compounds at the same time that I have already done tables for these. I can probably have a page for 1321:

with no whitespace (spaces, return, etc) around, and then he put the breaks where they should be. Thanks Martin for starting the article for real, and thanks K for nishing the job. PS. Of course it is in the

842:

I don't recall whether or not she got her PhD, though Knowledge doesn't mention a PhD. That would make sense since she was always referred to in England as "Mrs. Thatcher" not Dr. Thatcher (though I lived in

1445:

Note that the results as you see them here are highly browser dependent. Depending on the browser, these two tables may show you small oddities or larger ones. Success with taking precautions against it.

1504:

No need to apologize, Martin. All your efforts are highly appreciated, as you know. It did give a nice puzzle to work on (real relation or not), but as I couldn't be sure either way, I simply left it in.

686:

is better (for a smaller total number of articles, I'm not saying hispanophones are bad chemists ;). The francophones have got decent pages for the elements, but not much else as yet. Personally, I use

638:'s for the compounds, but neither can we ignore the safty issue altogether: the way that I see around this problem is to provide a collection of official safety data in the same way that we try to for, 1226:

Sorry to butt in on a private conversation, but if this problem has a relevance for style guidelines (and, God knows, we have problems with prefixes) can you make a public summary available? Cheers!

1315:

Thanks, K, I was still looking for that NFPA data. And yes, I was aware that I was widening the table, but I just wasn't done yet. The important thing that I reduced are the double hard returns

702:

question was not just a tease: as you seem to be the person keeping an eye on phosphorus halide pages, you should be aware that it is possible, even accidentally, to prepare small quantites of

427:

has no large-scale, legitimate industrial uses. However this is not because of toxicity or hydrolysis, simply because its notable use is not large-scale and is no longer legitimate... As for

507:

of safety, then for more information you can click a link to see a full MSDS page. Please give me your comments on this before we standardise on the template, I'd be very interested to hear.

914:

available. If you don't want that, it really should be deleted. Of course I'm quite willing to delete it, but perhaps you want to use it for your homepage or so. And I checked the Vfd page.

864:

compounds for which no safety data was available (imagine chemical research...) The rumours are, or course, unverifiable (but persistant)! As for editor bias, I was born about 15 miles from

1327: 463:

if you are doing the oxides. My other priority is to improve the level of safety information in these articles, but one thing at a time! All the best, and see you on the talk pages!

532:

Hey, nice job "Monsieur", on those transition metal compounds, I've been so busy on the template and my students' exams I didn't notice those links turning blue! I like the one on

1347:

learned HTML in a room full of programmers, who taught me that in writing code you should feel free to space things out and move things onto the next line to make the code

674:

No, the metal complex pages were there already, just badly indexed. I found them when I finally sat down and thought I should do a bit of proper article writing and not

1052:

inconsistencies- the article was written over about a month, by "distilling down" a lot of detail from a variety of sources, so inconsistencies may well have arisen.

298:

too. (I notice someone else started a very brief stub on the latter already). To meet our project goal, though, we'll have to turn these into full-length articles.

1307:

Hey, I found the NFPA rating for menthol and put it on the page. I also narrowed the chembox a wee bit. The page looks great. And thanks for fixing the blooper.

1243:, but someone else immediately reverted it. I pointed out the reason for my move, and he very kindly restored the move. This is the section from his talk page- 276:

comments about "family" pages: they have their place in the hierachy, and all the more so as Knowledge coverage becomes more complete. They enable us to give

129:

Thanks for all of your work on this stuff- I feel comfortable with chemistry but get out of my depth when I start getting involved with templates and so on.

513: 1320:'s in there that make the table look very erratic in layout. Again, here K did the appropriate thing: first I made it a wide table, using the <br/: --> 736:

entry for PCl3. I think the simple inorganic box is fine (I wrote it!), it's got the basic info in it, without you needing to travel to Lille for books.

237:

place, but if something is important enough it should also have a more general page. I've been thinking for a long time that we need family pages like

1461: 1454: 1240: 634:

government used a somewhat different route to the same compounds (see note above). Otherwise, I agree with your comment that we cannot start making

1247:. You can see that I also solicited his opinion on the interface with the drugs Wikiproject (he is a medical doctor and member of that project). 575: 1106:

to Peer Review: the subject is reasonably self-contained and of general interest. Otherwise, I'm doing remedial cleanup work around group 17 (

1170: 1159: 627: 599: 280:

information about compounds which either do not merit their own page or for which we haven't yet got round to writing a better article.

1297:

s in so that the table doesn't take over the page. Can we insert a couple of them back in in the appropriate places? Thanks again,

706:

while working with them. For the moment, I shall leave the ethical questions to individual editors, even the one who submitted the

1361:

There isn't anything special here: the wiki interpreter just interpretes whitespace differently than an HTML-browser. For Wiki a

826: 1484:

Yeah, right, only two 'cleanups', and now to trace who put a trifluoride under the heading of other ions. I'll help you: it was

1465: 428: 122: 109: 125:- personally I don't like this template, and I think we could do much better now we have a "critical mass" of active chemists. 312:

By the way, do you want us to call you Physchim62, or are you willing to reveal your real name? Thanks again for great work!

112:. My intention is to give the various effort a combination, so that they can be better together than separate. Please discuss 253:, and to cover things like complexes that don't warrant their own pages. But I'm not going to write any any time soon..! 1280:

missing the NFPA ratings really blocks such grade. Just kidding: this is again a very good article, Martin. Compliments.

1192:

of the images already made, just future images. As I said, this is very minor, but just something I wanted to bring up.

488:

You caught my attention with the section heading! I have a picture of HfCl4 if you do a page on that. I would call it

97: 1200:

recopied- I see this in students papers all the time- and I judged that having the reference in the image was better.

1035: 921:

I will leave it up- it's not as bad as most pictures of me- I will use it from time to time on my user page. Cheers,

747: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 58: 245:

that would give a general description of iron or copper in that particular oxidation state, to supplement pages like

329:

article and made a small correction. When I get a chance, I may make a couple additional small observations on the

164:

shortly after that. I am thinking that while I have all of the phosphorus books out in my office, I may as well do

366: 200: 38: 1236: 1122: 330: 228: 196: 703: 474: 432: 177: 165: 691:

regularly when I'm working through the list of chem-stubs and on other chemistry copy-edits, but I only check

223:

if these are distinctive and important enough to warrant them. We have something working against us, namely

559: 456: 180:. These probably won't get done till after the end of the semester (later May), then I can perhaps look at 431:, I consider myself a minor participant. For the moment I am working through cleanup, including cleanup of 137: 1464:. I have now summarized the discussion on that page and added certain points which have been discussed at 1030:, which currently covers chromic and dichromic acids and chromium trioxide. Please see my comment on the 773: 757:

to do so, and it was sort of on my way home from work! I also picked up enough info to try for a stubbish

607: 424: 385: 169: 157: 153: 1096:

as well, although I am currently short of the structure diagrams that these articles should really have.

1477: 1085: 1081: 647: 489: 460: 448: 444: 440: 406: 381: 192: 149: 911: 888:

Very amusing, I'm sure, now deleted thank you. I'd have chosen a rather prettier picture myself, like

1093: 1073: 1069: 939: 889: 762: 643: 542: 402: 370: 354: 346: 326: 304: 269: 161: 1089: 960: 754: 563: 1244: 1217: 1110: 1023: 935: 758: 294: 250: 173: 47: 17: 942:

page as a starting point? I'm almost ready to post my new page (written over several weeks) on

1212:

Sorry about PABA. Didn't realise. Shame Mediawiki does not document page moves in the history.

622:(info is PD, but you will excuse me for not shouting the links from the rooftops). Terrorists ( 452: 1488:. As faithful table converter, I of course kept this kind of 'worthwhile' information in ;-). 1031: 1018: 943: 860: 848: 567: 546: 578:

area. PS Thanks for the nice hunt subject for a lazy Whitsun-Monday morning (holiday here in

1506: 1489: 1447: 1331: 1281: 1174: 1039: 1003: 915: 893: 883: 811: 651: 583: 574:;-). As I don't like beer, I'll let you buy me champagne if ever I might find myself in the 533: 410: 405:

and my response to your question on the 103° bond angle reference question on my talk page:

389: 374: 334: 246: 224: 204: 141: 113: 1469: 1227: 1188: 1140: 1130: 1118: 1097: 1057: 988: 869: 830: 800: 715: 655: 611: 478: 464: 281: 1468:. Any comments, and especially improvements, on the results would be more than welcome. 1235:

Nothing new here really- hence no need to put it on the main project page. When I edit

792: 746:

FREE BEER anyway, seeing as I've had to withdraw my complaint about the preparation of

1076:

article, but it has the undeniable virtue of being available! After verification, the

1498: 1485: 1352: 1298: 1248: 1213: 1201: 1144: 984: 947: 922: 897: 853: 737: 710:

article, but I let myself draw your attention to the fact that such questions exists!

666: 623: 550: 522: 435:

but also a lot of translation work. So far my only original chemical contribution is

313: 273: 254: 220: 185: 130: 1239:, I regularly find pages that need fixing. I moved the page in accordance with our 1292:

whitespace reduction, Wim, are you aware that you've made the table a lot wider on

1027: 181: 1177: 1147: 1133: 1100: 1060: 1042: 1006: 950: 872: 833: 803: 740: 728:

suppose. I was astonished at how extensive the Knowledge entries for things like

718: 669: 658: 646:

and links thereto to get some idea. Finally, I have to admit that the articles on

553: 525: 481: 467: 413: 392: 337: 316: 284: 975:

as well as any other oddball phosphorus chlorides there happened to be, such as P

579: 571: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

865: 732:, all the more amazing when you consider that until last month we didn't have 1276:

I was about to classify this as an obvious A-Class article, but this blooper

1114: 844: 796: 776:

page (they have some 600 other chemical compound pages), so we're not doing

242: 1401: 1368: 1068:

For more serious matters, I will put any phosphorus halides article in my

238: 156:

done within a week, then I will have (albeit shorter) pages finished for

1169:

Please see comment on NMR Spectroscopy at the bottom of the web page in

1308: 1293: 1269: 1264: 1193: 1072:(at least initially): I have already mentioned my misgivings about the 536:

particularly I'll scrutinise them more when I have a little more time.

499: 436: 654:

are not my work - I only did copy-editing on them once I found them.

1366:(depending on which browser you use). A simple recommendation is: 946:, by the way, and I would very much appreciate feedback and edits. 714:

but that merely reflects the obtruse subject matter that I choose!

818: 788: 729: 707: 619: 615: 603: 216: 1139:

While I'm in a "phosphorus mood" I'm working my way through the

635: 631: 1187:

Hello Walkerma! I really like the images you've made for the

25: 896:

up as a Vfd candidate- not the user page, the user himself.

892:. By the way, Wim, I should perhaps mention that I have put 1245:

User_talk:Jfdwolff#Naming_of_organic_compounds_with_prefixes

1129:

will want some work from me before the end of term as well!

642:, thermodynamic data. See my (still incomplete) article on 549:, to the person who knows where Vaska did most of his work. 1125:

etc.) will need pulling into shape as well. And I guess my

1126: 384:

about Phosphorus chloride pictures and response regarding

172:

while I'm on, as well as two long-standing goals of mine,

769: 692: 688: 683: 679: 397:

Also, in case you haven't seen it yet, see the my POCl

148:

Hi there H. I am in fact currently writing a page on

1497:

closer. Sorry about that! I was only trying to help!

1143:, this important reaction deserves more than a stub. 570:, where he still lives in the area. Read about it on 541:

TRIVIA QUESTION- worth one free beer, brewed in the

477:, if only to prove that I am still a WikiBeginner! 136:Since you seem interested in chlorides, please see 614:precursor, notably in the "military" syntheses of 1026:in there, so I made that page a redirect link to 1088:are pretty much ready: I am willing to take on 1425:columns, even if they have the same number of 903:It wouldn't work: Mirren doesn't have glasses 8: 602:VfD, but you missed the crucial clue in the 514:Knowledge:WikiProject_Chemicals/Organization 910:PS. Your picture is still on Knowledge in 108:Hi Martin, I did some housekeeping on the 1208:Naming of organic compounds with prefixes 516:page, our goal is in fact just to ensure 455:are on my to do list, and I will take on 231:- but let's not go too far the other way. 195:. Are you finished with it? Please see 1462:Knowledge:Naming conventions (chemistry) 1455:Knowledge:Naming conventions (chemistry) 1296:? I actually inserted some <br/: --> 123:comments about the main chembox template 695:in the hope of being surprised one day! 768:USELESS FACT OF THE EVENING: not even 325:I have looked at your recently posted 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1034:page. Also please see my comment on 268:page is now available for comment at 7: 1171:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Chemicals 1160:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemicals 628:Sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway 1399:and another simple recommendation: 791:FREE BEER QUESTION: which post-war 600:List of Schedule 1 substances (CWC) 503:proposing that we put in just the 219:and other specific pages on (say) 24: 61:. Other close archives include: 57:For other talk page archives see 29: 1466:Knowledge:WikiProject Chemicals 682:is so lousy on chemistry, even 678:cleanup work. I've no idea why 545:, available in my home town of 429:Knowledge:WikiProject_Chemicals 191:My name is Henry. Nice job on 1460:Thank you for contributing to 795:Prime-Minister has a Ph.D. in 598:Thanks for the support on the 1: 423:I now have confirmation that 1328:the list of A-Class articles 1113:): the noble gas compounds ( 1509:19:37, July 13, 2005 (UTC). 1439:Just put one info-line in. 1036:Talk:Phosphorus oxychloride 59:User talk:Walkerma/Archives 1526: 1492:July 7, 2005 21:33 (UTC). 1450:July 7, 2005 20:39 (UTC). 1263:Hey Walkerma, I read the 878:Oestrogen chemical infobox 827:List that didn't get VfD'd 814:20:20, 2005 May 18 (UTC). 473:That should be cleanup of 367:Talk:Phosphorus tribromide 361:See Phosphorus Halide pics 201:Talk:Phosphorus tribromide 116:18:56, 2005 Apr 10 (UTC). 1410: 1407: 1404: 1374: 1371: 1334:July 7, 2005 19:32 (UTC). 1284:July 5, 2005 19:38 (UTC). 1237:list of organic compounds 1123:xenon hexafluoroplatinate 934:By the way, will the new 918:20:57, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC). 886:18:24, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC). 817:Yes, you have to come to 784:Maggie, Maggie, Maggie... 704:cholinesterase inhibitors 586:12:35, 2005 May 16 (UTC). 377:20:12, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) 331:Talk:Phosphorus triiodide 264:A presentable draft of a 229:List of organic compounds 197:Talk:Phosphorus chlorides 188:18:13, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC) 144:16:45, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC) 133:22:28, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1501:8 July 2005 02:58 (UTC) 1472:7 July 2005 11:00 (UTC) 1311:7 July 2005 04:10 (UTC) 1272:5 July 2005 19:24 (UTC) 1222:08:01, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1204:04:26, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1196:04:19, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1178:08:59, 27 May 2005 (UTC) 1165:Back to NMR Spectroscopy 1148:14:42, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 1134:22:50, 22 May 2005 (UTC) 1101:22:04, 18 May 2005 (UTC) 1061:19:01, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 1043:09:51, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 1007:09:08, 19 May 2005 (UTC) 951:21:26, 18 May 2005 (UTC) 925:04:32, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC) 900:18:53, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) 873:22:04, 18 May 2005 (UTC) 834:21:19, 18 May 2005 (UTC) 804:19:15, 18 May 2005 (UTC) 741:15:00, 17 May 2005 (UTC) 719:22:37, 16 May 2005 (UTC) 670:21:49, 16 May 2005 (UTC) 659:20:05, 16 May 2005 (UTC) 566:, coincidentally (?) in 554:23:43, 15 May 2005 (UTC) 526:20:14, 10 May 2005 (UTC) 482:19:30, 10 May 2005 (UTC) 475:Category:Chemistry stubs 468:19:25, 10 May 2005 (UTC) 433:Category:Chemistry stubs 414:09:08, 19 May 2005 (UTC) 338:09:51, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 317:18:11, 21 May 2005 (UTC) 285:13:53, 21 May 2005 (UTC) 257:17:28, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) 207:15:19, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) 178:triphenylphosphine oxide 166:phosphorus pentachloride 1355:7 July 2005 20:04 (UTC) 1324:Fully compliant A-Class 1301:6 July 2005 22:09 (UTC) 1251:14:50, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1230:14:20, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) 630:) and (apparently) the 606:free beer competition! 457:zirconium tetrachloride 419:FREE BEER (but not yet) 393:22:08, 6 May 2005 (UTC) 303:I have added a page on 861:Margaret Hilda Roberts 774:phosphorus trichloride 765:first for comments. 608:Phosphorus trifluoride 425:phosphorus trifluoride 386:Phosphorus trichloride 170:phosphorus oxychloride 158:phosphorus trifluoride 154:phosphorus trichloride 1478:phosphorus tribromide 1086:Iridium(III) chloride 1082:Rhodium(III) chloride 1056:applications. Bravo. 825:: Please consult the 821:to claim your prize. 761:page; it will appear 461:hafnium tetrachloride 445:iridium(III) chloride 441:rhodium(III) chloride 407:User talk:H Padleckas 382:User Talk:H Padleckas 193:Phosphorus tribromide 150:phosphorus tribromide 138:WikiProject Chemicals 110:Chemistry wikiproject 42:of past discussions. 1476:Two cleanups in the 1094:molybdenum disulfide 1074:phosphorus chlorides 963:article to cover PCl 940:phosphorus chlorides 829:before accepting :) 753:! Only had to go to 648:Wilkinson's catalyst 644:Directive 67/548/EEC 543:Adirondack Mountains 490:Wilkinson's catalyst 449:Wilkinson's compound 403:Phosphorus chlorides 371:Phosphorus chlorides 355:phosphorus triiodide 327:Phosphorus triiodide 305:phosphorus triiodide 270:User:Physchim62/Temp 162:phosphorus triiodide 1391:inline <br/: --> 1241:"rough style guide" 1090:molybdenum trioxide 961:Phosphorus chloride 1111:chlorine fluorides 1024:Chromium(VI) oxide 936:phosphorus halides 912:Image:Walkerma.jpg 882:You asked for it. 759:phosphorus halides 347:phosphorus halides 345:Glad you like the 295:phosphorus halides 266:phosphorus halides 251:copper(I) chloride 174:triphenylphosphine 18:User talk:Walkerma 1443: 1442: 1397: 1396: 1220: 1032:Talk:Chromic acid 1019:Vanadium(V) oxide 959:I originated the 944:vanadium(V) oxide 849:Labour party (UK) 568:Potsdam, New York 547:Potsdam, New York 100: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1517: 1402: 1369: 1218: 1183:Image suggestion 894:User:Wimvandorst 890:Image:Mirren.jpg 612:chemical weapons 453:Vaska's compound 439:! All the same, 247:iron(II) sulfate 225:The Two Cultures 64: 33: 32: 26: 1525: 1524: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1482: 1458: 1341: 1261: 1210: 1189:Wittig reaction 1185: 1167: 1156: 1141:Wittig reaction 1119:xenon tetroxide 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 931: 906: 880: 786: 751: 652:Vaska's complex 580:The Netherlands 534:Vaska's complex 421: 400: 363: 272:. I agree with 106: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1523: 1521: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1481: 1474: 1457: 1452: 1441: 1440: 1437: 1434: 1431: 1428: 1421: 1419: 1417: 1413: 1412: 1409: 1406: 1395: 1394: 1392: 1390: 1387: 1377: 1376: 1373: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1340: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1286: 1285: 1260: 1257: 1255: 1253: 1252: 1232: 1231: 1209: 1206: 1184: 1181: 1166: 1163: 1155: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 996: 995: 994: 993: 980: 976: 972: 968: 964: 954: 953: 930: 927: 904: 887: 879: 876: 868:, 'nuff said! 857: 856: 839: 838: 837: 836: 785: 782: 749: 744: 743: 724: 723: 722: 721: 711: 696: 596: 595: 590: 589: 588: 587: 538: 537: 529: 528: 512:Regarding the 509: 508: 494: 493: 485: 484: 420: 417: 398: 362: 359: 343: 342: 341: 340: 320: 319: 309: 308: 300: 299: 290: 289: 288: 287: 259: 258: 233: 232: 211: 210: 209: 208: 127: 126: 105: 102: 56: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1522: 1508: 1507:Wim van Dorst 1503: 1502: 1500: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1491: 1490:Wim van Dorst 1487: 1479: 1475: 1473: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1456: 1453: 1451: 1449: 1448:Wim van Dorst 1438: 1436: 1432: 1429: 1426: 1422: 1415: 1414: 1403: 1400: 1388: 1386: 1385:hard returns 1383: 1382:use (double) 1379: 1378: 1370: 1367: 1364: 1354: 1350: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1333: 1332:Wim van Dorst 1329: 1325: 1318: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1310: 1300: 1295: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1282:Wim van Dorst 1279: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1271: 1266: 1259:Menthol image 1258: 1256: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1221: 1215: 1207: 1205: 1203: 1197: 1195: 1190: 1182: 1180: 1179: 1176: 1172: 1164: 1162: 1161: 1158:Now moved to 1153: 1149: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1109: 1103: 1102: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1062: 1059: 1054: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1044: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1008: 1005: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 990: 986: 962: 958: 957: 956: 955: 952: 949: 945: 941: 938:page use the 937: 933: 932: 928: 926: 924: 919: 917: 916:Wim van Dorst 913: 908: 901: 899: 895: 891: 885: 884:Wim van Dorst 877: 875: 874: 871: 867: 862: 855: 850: 846: 841: 840: 835: 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 815: 813: 812:Wim van Dorst 808: 807: 806: 805: 802: 798: 794: 790: 783: 781: 779: 775: 771: 766: 764: 760: 756: 752: 742: 739: 735: 731: 726: 725: 720: 717: 712: 709: 705: 701: 697: 694: 690: 685: 681: 677: 673: 672: 671: 668: 663: 662: 661: 660: 657: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 633: 629: 625: 624:Aum Shinrikyo 621: 617: 613: 609: 605: 601: 592: 591: 585: 584:Wim van Dorst 581: 577: 573: 569: 565: 561: 557: 556: 555: 552: 548: 544: 540: 539: 535: 531: 530: 527: 524: 519: 515: 511: 510: 506: 501: 496: 495: 492:, by the way. 491: 487: 486: 483: 480: 476: 472: 471: 470: 469: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 418: 416: 415: 412: 408: 404: 395: 394: 391: 387: 383: 378: 376: 372: 368: 360: 358: 356: 351: 348: 339: 336: 332: 328: 324: 323: 322: 321: 318: 315: 311: 310: 306: 302: 301: 296: 292: 291: 286: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 262: 261: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 235: 234: 230: 226: 222: 221:ethyl acetate 218: 213: 212: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 189: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 146: 145: 143: 139: 134: 132: 124: 119: 118: 117: 115: 114:Wim van Dorst 111: 103: 101: 99: 95: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 62: 60: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1483: 1459: 1444: 1433: 1430: 1427: 1424: 1416:don't expect 1398: 1384: 1381: 1362: 1360: 1348: 1323: 1319:<br/: --> 1316: 1306: 1277: 1268:mention it. 1262: 1254: 1211: 1198: 1186: 1168: 1157: 1107: 1104: 1080:sections of 1077: 1067: 1028:Chromic acid 929:Ongoing work 920: 909: 902: 881: 858: 822: 787: 777: 767: 745: 733: 699: 675: 639: 597: 517: 504: 422: 396: 379: 364: 352: 344: 277: 265: 182:ethylbenzene 135: 128: 107: 104:WikiProjects 63: 55: 43: 37: 1363:hard return 1175:H Padleckas 1154:Amino acids 1078:Preparation 1040:H Padleckas 1004:H Padleckas 572:Lauri Vaska 411:H Padleckas 401:picture in 390:H Padleckas 380:See end of 375:H Padleckas 335:H Padleckas 274:Dr Walker's 205:H Padleckas 142:H Padleckas 36:This is an 1470:Physchim62 1420:alignment 1418:horizontal 1339:Whitespace 1228:Physchim62 1131:Physchim62 1098:Physchim62 1058:Physchim62 992:compounds. 989:Physchim62 971:, and POCl 870:Physchim62 866:Scunthorpe 831:Physchim62 823:Disclaimer 801:Physchim62 716:Physchim62 656:Physchim62 479:Physchim62 465:Physchim62 293:Hey, that 282:Physchim62 1127:employers 1115:perxenate 1108:see, e.g. 1070:userspace 987:(or does 845:Gateshead 797:Chemistry 700:free beer 698:BTW, the 594:mark too. 388:review. 243:Copper(I) 98:Archive10 1499:Walkerma 1486:this guy 1393:instead 1353:Walkerma 1349:readable 1299:Walkerma 1249:Walkerma 1202:Walkerma 1145:Walkerma 985:Walkerma 948:Walkerma 923:Walkerma 898:Walkerma 854:Walkerma 847:, solid 780:badly. 738:Walkerma 667:Walkerma 564:Clarkson 551:Walkerma 523:Walkerma 314:Walkerma 255:Walkerma 239:Iron(II) 186:Walkerma 131:Walkerma 94:Archive9 90:Archive8 86:Archive7 82:Archive6 78:Archive5 74:Archive4 70:Archive2 66:Archive1 1480:chembox 1423:of two 1389:but use 1380:do not 1294:Menthol 1265:Menthol 1017:Is the 819:Atrecht 793:British 626:in the 500:alcohol 437:stibine 353:As for 333:page. 39:archive 1435:lines 1038:too. 772:has a 505:basics 217:esters 184:too. 1411:GOOD 1405:GOOD 1375:GOOD 967:, PCl 859:Yes, 789:ARRAS 730:sarin 708:ricin 632:Iraqi 620:Soman 616:Sarin 610:is a 604:Arras 16:< 1408:BAD 1372:BAD 1219:T@lk 1092:and 1084:and 763:here 755:Lens 676:just 650:and 640:e.g. 636:MSDS 618:and 576:SUNY 562:and 560:TAMU 459:and 451:and 369:and 365:See 278:some 199:and 176:and 168:and 160:and 1326:on 1317:and 1278:and 1214:JFW 1173:. 905:;-) 778:too 770:ja: 734:any 693:fr: 689:de: 684:es: 680:fr: 582:). 558:At 518:one 409:. 373:. 249:or 241:or 203:. 140:. 1330:. 1309:~K 1270:~K 1216:| 1194:~K 1121:, 1117:, 979:Cl 907:. 799:? 748:PF 447:, 443:, 96:— 92:— 88:— 84:— 80:— 76:— 72:— 68:— 981:4 977:2 973:3 969:5 965:3 750:3 399:3 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index