1525:
also admitted to understand that some people think it's better to use less photos. 4. I even wrote "Greetings" at the end of my message. And as a thank you you stab me in the back now? I didn't even change the obvious mistakes at
Bautzen and Cottbus i was talking about above :-) It is interesting, that if you are being told about some obvious mistakes that persist at an article, you are far away from perhaps changing it. (The intro has to read: Bautzen (Upper Sorbian: Budyšin) and not Bautzen or Budyšin). Lastly, you must know yourself that your Vienna photo is unsuitable, and still you don't do anything to change it, although i was waiting for it. Instead you are reading my contributions and try to push me into a bad light.
1425:
and
Bautzen who insisted that the Sorbian names of the cities are to be treated equally in the introduction. Since then, this is wrong, because the English name is the one which is used most often in English, and not the official ones. It is crystal clear that the Sorbian names of Cottbus and Bautzen are not used as often as the German ones. Still he is convinced he's right.... And at Vienna someone changed the first photo to something that shows nothing. I know that i am right in all three cases, thank you for showing through you answers that there is no substance behind the deletions you carry out, including your Hamburg deletions last year.
1458:
Cottbus and Vienna, therefore it is obsolete to mention that here as new realization, and everyone with a common sense knows, that i am right, or is the name for cities at articles not the most used one in
English, and therefore the German and not the Sorbian one? Also, everyone sees that the first photo at Vienna now shows nothing. But that's your second trick, to make it appear as if i am involved in many disputes, to discredit my contributions... It's all so clear... But showing the rule that states how many photos may be used in collages, that won't come here cause it doesn't exist.
612:, thank you very much for your contributions to Knowledge. I agree that the lead should highlight the practical limitations more. Nevertheless, I believe the earlier version had certain merits that deserve consideration, mainly in terms of flow and coherence, offering a clearer explanation of the relationship between classical and quantum computers, and introducing quantum supremacy in a more natural way. I also think that the phrasing "hype around the discipline" is potentially unencyclopedic. Additionally, I'm not too sure why you removed the final sentence that introduced
1533:
886:
130:
1132:"In 2015, the Knowledge Ranking of World Universities listed the University of Göttingen as the 23rd among the world's top universities and the 3rd best in Germany (with footnote). However, The University of Göttingen's rankings vary significantly across different business-oriented global university rankings, reflecting a wide range of evaluation criteria for and perspectives on its academic and research performance."
1584:
936:
799:
1121:"Experiments show that the Knowledge university rankings provide a certain overlap compared with the existing world university rankings. Besides, Knowledge university rankings attach more importance to the overall economic and cultural contributions of universities and make up for some of the deficiencies of ranking index system." - Mining the World University Rankings from Knowledge, 2020, available at:
734:
517:
466:
196:
is more famous. You deleted the Vltava info, although it was just a note not occupying space, and you deleted also the Stern info but
Spiegel is still there. And you did all this, without explanation. And at Erfurt, note that it is completely uncommon to mention all the distances to different German cities. Justification for all this please
1443:" argument is still void because each article exists on its own. Looking at your own talk page though, I see that you already have a history of dealing with other editors in bad faith. Once again, if you think there is a real content dispute, take it to the article's talk page, and stop harassing other users on their talk pages.
1487:
interested in a lengthy discussion about the collage either... You just hope that it's too stressful for me to open a talk page discussion and that way everything stays as you wish it to be. And now please stop writing more sentences of which we both know the complex, unwritten thoughts that are really behind them.
1202:". I have a few points I'd like to clarify. In the first paragraph I am sure those all base on the official website of the organization. I am not sure why it is unreliable. I hope you can cheak that again. Also, I know it was very different from the original version but the original version was describing
634:, I can agree that "hype around the discipline" doesn't seem encyclopedic, but it is semantically appropriate given the circumstances. Would you be comfortable with "unusually high expectations for" or "irrational exuberance related to" "the discipline" or some other appropriately elevated substitute?
279:
First of all, you deleted the second spelling variant as well as the local dialect variant from the infobox, although a look at other cities' articles shows, that it is in fact common practice to mention the alternative names in the infobox. For sure, you will be able to cite the
Knowledge rules that
1524:
Are you now kidding me
Vitsuha? 1. I didn't even revert your edit, although everyone sees that the first photo you inserted is completely unsuitable. 2. Then i even admitted that i didn't like the old photo that i used for the collage either, but that there was no better one (as we can see now) 3. I
1076:
Again, I don't know where you're from, but I believe this must be a place for free speech and not censorship. Who says those rankings are the golden and objective criteria that one must buy?! These rankings are all products developed by commercial companies for business purposes. I added those words
195:
Explanation for your
Hamburg change please. Everything you like, you leave as it is, and what you don't like, you delete. You deleted Bauer Media Group but Gruner + Jahr is still there. You deleted Heinrich Hertz, Johannes Brahms and Felix Mendelssohn, but Helmut Schmidt is still there. I wonder who
1540:
This photo shows the rear part of the
Belvedere park... The palace itself isn't visible, no important landmarks of the skyline are visible, there is just nothing to see there. This photo speaks for itself, it doesn't have to do anything with my supposed arrogance. And i didn't even change the photo
1424:
Again i'm telling you, if the amount of photos was the reason to delete the whole new collage, and you see that there are dozens of others of my collages with the same amount of photos.... you would have to delete them all. Otherwise your reasoning is inconsistent. There was someone else at
Cottbus
1361:
You forgot to revert my other changes at
Frankfurt, Freiburg, Leipzig, Dresden and so on..... You are the one from the Hamburg dispute some time ago, where you also prevented some major changes that would have to be done, at the same time retaining those parts of my changes that you personally were
1150:
In other words, I wanted to provide this source along with the outcome of the Knowledge ranking as EVIDENCE that "the rankings vary considerably". This is neutral - I'm not saying which one should prevail, but just pointed this out, rather than let one voice dominate and suppress a different voice,
296:
Concerning Hamburg, my first question would be, if the lead is supposed to summarize the most important things as you wrote, why is it that Olaf Scholz being chancellor since December 2021 is in the lead of Hamburg. Do you really think that something like that would be in the lead of Britannica? It
1509:
case. And I would say that that Tibesti1 you are somewhat arrogant and always feel you're the right person and doesn't take other's advice. Adding too many pictures (even if they are of high quality) in the infobox may not help to improve the overall quality of the article but cause difficulty of
1395:
May i ask why you don't revert the other photo collages? And don't forget the already stable ones at Mainz, Wiesbaden and Stuttgart..... Somehow, your too many photos argument is invalid..... Is here a rule somewhere that a certain amount of photos may not be exceeded? What is the real reason why
272:
Secondly, a closer look at what you exactly do shows, that you can't have read carefully through all my edits before reverting them, but that you just randomly and broadly reverted all my edits from one day. Otherwise it is not explainable, that the Spiegel is now again called a newspaper in the
1457:
I know exactly that those are all tricks by you, to redirect everything you don't like to the talk pages, where the issues then resolve themselves according to your ideas, because not enough people participate there, and you neither... Secondly, i told you about the other two issues at Bautzen,
1135:
What I added was completely verifiable, and actually reflected the problem with the rankings of the university of Göttingen (probably with other universities as well) - esp. with the help of this new footnote as verifiable support. I do strongly think this edit should be added, even though this
1486:
An the second stage of the trick.... I know that you are indeed right, and that as soon as someone doesn't like a contribution, he can claim it being discussed on the talk page.... However, also everyone knows that this is the best way to prevent changes one doesn't like. I don't think you are
587:
article without providing an explanation. I think that it is always a good idea to explain your reasons for preferring the older version when reverting changes to an article. I had made the change to help make the lead more concise, and to mention the hype around quantum technology, as I had
347:
When you make a massive edit that improves some aspects while introducing a number of gross errors, you can not reasonably expect other editors to manually undo every error while keeping your improvements in. In that case, a reversion to an earlier revision is not an endorsement of the prior
1210:
in this directory. Even the original version was not based on any evidence. For the reasons mentioned above, I took the opportunity to modify the "Academics" section and listed the departments and research units. This was because the page lacked content, and I hoped that by providing this
643:
Is there a universal scientific consensus declaring quantum computing to be overhyped? If not, I propose rephrasing "generated hype around the discipline" to something like "generated notable interest in the discipline" or "drawn considerable discourse in the discipline" to comply with
1608:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
1168:. There are dozens of university rankings. Do you wish to include every single one of them? It is common practice to stick to the most commonly known by their prominence in reliable sources. Cherry-picking the most favorable rankings for a university is
273:
lead, and not a magazine. You tell me to be careful when editing a lead of an article, when it is in fact the case that i'm the one who reads through it carefully and tries to improve it, and you are the one reverting it to a state full of mistakes.
283:
Secondly, you deleted the info, that there also appears a gallic rooster in the coat of arms of Słubice and not just of Frankfurt. Now while one can do that, one doesn't have to do that. Maybe you can explain why it's better not to mention
558:
Hi, I notice that you have not yet started work on addressing the issues made in my review for this article. Please note that the nomination will be failed on 11 July, as stated in the review, if they are are all sorted by then. Regards,
1611:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has
1128:
The edits I made previously to the paragraph about ranking were not just my own comments. Instead, the vast differences in the results of the rankings along with this new footnote (which I didn't add last time) well document my previous
1362:
ok with. Comparing the old and the new photo collage, it is obvious that the new one is far better. And you are using that talk page trick, exactly knowing that no one is gonna reply on the talk page cause no one is interested in it.
1604:
1217:
within the paragraph (which is from the NPTU official website, describing a brief history), without explicitly stating in the title of the table that my reference was from the official website. This was my oversight.
297:
is obvious, the most famous sons of Hamburg are Brahms, Mendelssohn and Hertz, and you deleted all of them, while Merkel, Schmidt and Scholz are still there. But you will surely have a good explanation for that, too.
348:
revision, as you imply, but simply a recognition of the fact that the newer revision has made the article worse from an objective viewpoint. To avoid this, make small, individual changes over time, and use the
287:
Thirdly, the name section of Frankfurt seems to be much too short to be justified. If there is not enough material for a name section, the alternative names are normally mentioned right at the beginning of the
821:
1230:
Notably, the College of Education and the College of Management stand out as prominent academic institutions within NPTU. In the 2023 Times Higher Education (THE) Impact Rankings, NPTU was globally ranked
268:
First of all, let me tell you, the manner in which you go around here deleting things is not very pleasing. Treating my edits as if they were vandalism, although none of them has the slightest touch of
366:
Your Frankfurt (Oder) change. Are you telling me that i may not revert your last change there, but discuss each of the four points on the talk page, or change it back again in four different steps?
291:
Fourthly, there is now again that sentence "The large lake Helenesee lies within Frankfurt's city limits." in the article. This sentence reads like a non-sentence, as if there is missing something.
1227:
NPTU offers undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral programs across 7 colleges: Management, Computer Science, Education, Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, Science, International, and Mt. Dawu.
893:
1049:. None of the two entries you added are sufficiently relevant to the university itself that it warrants inclusion. The song does not even mention the university. The film contains only a
1239:
NPTU has 7 colleges: Computer Science, Education, Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, Management, Science, International, and Mt. Dawu. Also, NPTU has the Center of Teacher Education.
1203:
1396:
someone would prefer a much uglier collage to a beautiful one. Did he really compare the two collages or just blindly delete it because it contains too many photos in his opinion.
330:, and I have no personal stake other than wanting to see each article improved. We do have policies and guidelines to follow here, but that is not the point. Knowledge is built on
1136:
ranking is not mentioned in the text of rankings in most other universities. However, what others did or didn't do should not serve as the precedent for edits, as you mentioned.
958:
394:
And what are the criteria for including Low German names of cities in the Low German language area? As we can see at Turin, there the infobox also shows the name in Piedmontese.
1472:
I'm afraid that I can't help you here. If you do not wish to participate in Knowledge's collaboration process, well, then... don't. No one is forcing you to be on this site.
250:
Quite frankly, you have to be very careful when editing the lead of a major article. If you disagree with my assessment, please discuss it on the article's talk page, per
524:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
1326:
The subject rankings you added to Kyoto University are of Osaka University, and vice versa. You may check your edits in other universities' arcticles as well.
380:
I am not convinced that the Marchian name is notably to warrant such a prominent inclusion in the lead and infobox. Adding a footnote is perhaps more suitable.
1589:
1574:
84:
1593:
753:
within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.
149:
1077:
without censoring the original ones, so why censor my ideas? Do you recognize the 'marketplace of ideas' - a fundamental principle of free speech?
964:
837:
276:
Now that i told you the first mistake you made reappear again, it goes on. To begin with Frankfurt (Oder), your reverts are highly problematic.
1211:
information, readers would be able to gain a detailed understanding of the university. These contents are still based on the official website.
90:
49:
1327:
1030:). Why can't university of Göttingen have such an item? I hope we'll put the section I contributed back to where they were. Thank you.
924:
787:
728:
511:
1010:
I contributed this section of 'in fiction and popular culture' in the same style as in other items such as 'heidelberg university' (
1118:
OK - thanks: 'verifiability', 'merit' and 'not precedent'. Well said! I just found the following footnote to the Knowledge ranking:
1039:
1410:
I suggest you start a discussion on the article's talk page instead of framing this as some sort of personal crusade against you.
742:
529:
448:
469:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
326:
You are treating this like a personal issue, when it's not. I have no intention nor desire to be hostile to you. All of us are
164:
159:
154:
116:
112:
108:
1505:'s contribution site, and I do have the same feeling that you did add excessive images in the infobox, as we discussed in the
1232:
35:
234:
Factual errors. Stating that the Elbe river is actually the Vltava river is simply wrong. And also has no place in the lead.
745:
for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a
79:
616:, which was certainly useful. However, I value your thoughtful edits and encourage you to continue refining the article.
1207:
1199:
986:
853:
738:
525:
352:
where you explain your reasoning behind the change, giving other editors the chance to review each change individually.
70:
750:
103:
334:, and if someone disagrees with your changes, you discuss the topic on the talk page, so other editors can may in.
1597:
613:
175:
1050:
1331:
1304:
Thank you for the reminder. I will review the content again and make appropriate adjustments in the future.
1101:
724:
717:
713:
679:
507:
500:
496:
452:
441:
437:
1309:
1261:
1046:
906:
769:
701:
593:
564:
548:
485:
408:
Inclusion is decided on a case-to-case basis. Feel free to discuss it on the talk page if you disagree.
1305:
1273:
1257:
975:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.
846:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.
1440:
1532:
1542:
1502:
1488:
1459:
1426:
1397:
1378:
1363:
1287:
395:
367:
327:
321:
298:
197:
60:
1511:
1546:
1492:
1463:
1430:
1401:
1367:
399:
371:
302:
201:
181:
75:
1152:
1137:
1078:
1031:
885:
1122:
1619:
1515:
1506:
1169:
902:
765:
760:
584:
560:
544:
539:
481:
476:
56:
982:
849:
756:
690:
635:
589:
535:
472:
212:
177:
129:
1156:
1141:
1082:
1035:
598:
460:
1215:
521:
1283:
1165:
1093:
1003:
My contribution of 'In fiction and popular culture' as in numerous other similar items.
645:
238:
1214:
I may have been negligent in the history section because I only mentioned the citation
1092:
It does not matter what you or others consider "free speech". Knowledge operates on a
1473:
1444:
1411:
1382:
1342:
1291:
1173:
1105:
1054:
649:
631:
617:
409:
381:
353:
331:
255:
251:
225:
31:
1439:
I have not looked at your other edits, and I have no obligation to do so. But your "
935:
798:
1615:
1279:
1097:
456:
349:
17:
1377:
You may call it "trick" or whatever you like, but talk pages but the way we build
1253:
Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering (B.Eng.; M.S.) .......
1002:
991:
858:
813:
On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
1240:
1228:
950:
On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
609:
1198:
Hello, I'm Shuting23521. I noticed that you removed the version I edited in "
1027:
1605:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/XIX International Chopin Piano Competition
1011:
1341:
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have corrected the error.
580:
179:
1023:
1623:
1550:
1519:
1496:
1481:
1467:
1452:
1434:
1419:
1405:
1390:
1381:
here on Knowledge. This is not a personal dispute between you and me.
1371:
1350:
1335:
1313:
1299:
1265:
1181:
1160:
1145:
1113:
1086:
1062:
1019:
997:
910:
864:
773:
657:
638:
625:
602:
568:
552:
489:
417:
403:
389:
375:
361:
306:
263:
205:
592:
in the article talk page. Could you please explain your rationale at
749:
under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
1531:
1015:
215:) because your changes are problematic from multiple viewpoints.
1322:
You seem to have confused Kyoto University and Osaka University
1286:
policies. Language such as "give Pingtung a bright future" is
182:
123:
26:
1096:
with due and balanced weights given to opinions and a strict
1123:
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9142517/metrics#metrics
934:
797:
280:
allow you to delete the alternative names from the infobox.
702:
Talk:Quantum computing § Why is Skepticism buried so deep?
1588:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1278:
Please feel free to add information that observes the
1510:
reader to grab necessary information when they read.
1592:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
892:
779:August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
1250:Department of Computer and Communication (B.Eng.)
1151:no matter whether anyone thinks this is correct.
1028:https://en.wikipedia.org/University_of_Cambridge
596:so that we can reach a reasonable consensus? —
38:, where you can send him messages and comments.
1012:https://en.wikipedia.org/Heidelberg_University
579:Hi! I see that you reverted my changes to the
447:Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
1045:Inclusion is considered on individual merit,
1024:https://en.wikipedia.org/University_of_Oxford
8:
878:
218:Major grammatical errors and MOS violations.
1100:. If you want to add something, ensure its
1020:https://en.wikipedia.org/Harvard_University
1590:XIX International Chopin Piano Competition
1575:XIX International Chopin Piano Competition
1166:Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion
884:
877:
1194:Detail About National Pingtung University
1069:Different views about university rankings
532:for issues which need to be addressed.
237:Trivial additions not relevant to what a
1016:https://en.wikipedia.org/Yale_University
672:
231:templates. They are there for a reason.
838:Join the conversations on our talkpage
520:. The article is close to meeting the
1290:and unsuitable for an encyclopaedia.
7:
741:for comments about the article, and
211:I restored an earlier revision (see
1594:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
956:Interested in taking part? You can
819:Interested in taking part? You can
25:
1602:The article will be discussed at
241:is supposed to do: summarize the
1582:
732:
515:
464:
128:
50:Click here to start a new topic.
1221:I hope don't remove all of it.
1098:exclusion of original research
1:
1182:19:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
1161:19:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
1146:18:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
1114:14:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
1087:13:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
1063:14:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
1040:13:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
998:02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
743:Talk:Africa (Saint-Saëns)/GA1
530:Talk:Africa (Saint-Saëns)/GA1
47:Put new text under old text.
1200:National Pingtung University
1026:), University of Cambridge (
916:March 2024 GAN backlog drive
911:08:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
1528:This was your contribution:
1501:I saw your discussion from
1245:College of Computer Science
55:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1639:
1441:but what about other stuff
1351:10:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
1336:10:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
1314:11:50, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
1300:11:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
1266:11:05, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
953:Barnstars will be awarded.
833:Other ways to participate:
816:Barnstars will be awarded.
809:August 2023 Backlog Drive:
588:previously discussed with
1022:), University of Oxford (
974:
946:March 2024 Backlog Drive:
933:
883:
865:05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
845:
831:
796:
793:August 2023 Backlog Drive
774:07:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
739:Talk:Africa (Saint-Saëns)
614:quantum complexity theory
526:Talk:Africa (Saint-Saëns)
490:08:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
459:-status according to the
404:10:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
390:08:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
376:12:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
362:12:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
307:12:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
264:07:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
206:00:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
85:Be welcoming to newcomers
1624:15:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
1596:or whether it should be
1551:02:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
1520:00:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
1497:15:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
1482:15:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
1477:
1468:15:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
1453:14:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
1448:
1435:07:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
1420:16:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
1415:
1406:23:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
1391:22:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
1386:
1372:17:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
1346:
1295:
1177:
1109:
1058:
930:March 2024 Backlog Drive
925:Good article nominations
788:Good article nominations
658:09:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
653:
639:23:47, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
626:14:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
621:
603:12:20, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
569:14:32, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
553:20:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
514:has been placed on hold
418:10:02, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
413:
385:
357:
259:
245:contents of the article.
1018:), harvard university (
680:Special:Diff/1163359182
1536:
939:
802:
594:Talk:Quantum computing
575:Quantum computing lead
80:avoid personal attacks
1535:
1284:neutral point of view
1094:neutral point of view
938:
801:
755:Message delivered by
534:Message delivered by
522:good article criteria
471:Message delivered by
1014:), yale university (
874:Precious anniversary
725:Africa (Saint-Saëns)
718:Africa (Saint-Saëns)
508:Africa (Saint-Saëns)
501:Africa (Saint-Saëns)
453:Africa (Saint-Saëns)
442:Africa (Saint-Saëns)
1224:first paragraph:
880:
727:you nominated as a
510:you nominated as a
18:User talk:Weltforce
1537:
965:ask questions here
940:
803:
455:you nominated for
91:dispute resolution
52:
979:
978:
899:
898:
871:
870:
763:
585:quantum computing
542:
479:
188:
187:
122:
121:
71:Assume good faith
48:
16:(Redirected from
1630:
1586:
1585:
1277:
994:
931:
920:
919:
888:
881:
861:
794:
783:
782:
754:
736:
735:
704:
699:
693:
688:
682:
677:
601:
533:
519:
518:
470:
468:
467:
325:
230:
224:
183:
132:
124:
27:
21:
1638:
1637:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1613:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1359:
1324:
1280:reliable source
1271:
1206:instead of the
1196:
1071:
1051:trivial mention
1005:
992:
929:
918:
876:
859:
792:
781:
759:, on behalf of
733:
721:
709:
708:
707:
700:
696:
689:
685:
678:
674:
597:
577:
538:, on behalf of
516:
504:
475:, on behalf of
465:
449:begun reviewing
445:
319:
228:
222:
193:
184:
178:
169:
137:
97:
96:
66:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1636:
1634:
1581:
1580:
1578:
1573:Nomination of
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1538:
1529:
1526:
1499:
1358:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1323:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1255:
1254:
1251:
1195:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1170:violating NPOV
1133:
1130:
1126:
1119:
1070:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1004:
1001:
977:
976:
972:
971:
970:
969:
954:
951:
942:
941:
932:
917:
914:
897:
896:
890:
889:
875:
872:
869:
868:
843:
842:
841:
840:
829:
828:
827:
826:
817:
814:
805:
804:
795:
780:
777:
720:
716:nomination of
710:
706:
705:
694:
683:
671:
670:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
576:
573:
572:
571:
503:
499:nomination of
493:
444:
440:nomination of
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
312:
311:
310:
309:
294:
293:
292:
289:
285:
281:
274:
270:
248:
247:
246:
243:most important
235:
232:
219:
192:
189:
186:
185:
180:
176:
174:
171:
170:
168:
167:
162:
157:
152:
146:
143:
142:
139:
138:
133:
127:
120:
119:
99:
98:
95:
94:
87:
82:
73:
67:
65:
64:
53:
44:
43:
40:
39:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1635:
1626:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1610:
1607:
1606:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1576:
1572:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1539:
1534:
1530:
1527:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1328:78.104.180.89
1321:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1275:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1252:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1222:
1219:
1216:
1212:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1193:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1134:
1131:
1127:
1124:
1120:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1102:verifiability
1099:
1095:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1074:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1047:not precedent
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1008:
1000:
999:
996:
995:
988:
984:
973:
967:
966:
961:
960:
955:
952:
949:
948:
947:
944:
943:
937:
928:
926:
922:
921:
915:
913:
912:
908:
904:
895:
891:
887:
882:
873:
867:
866:
863:
862:
855:
851:
844:
839:
836:
835:
834:
830:
824:
823:
818:
815:
812:
811:
810:
807:
806:
800:
791:
789:
785:
784:
778:
776:
775:
771:
767:
762:
758:
752:
748:
744:
740:
730:
726:
719:
715:
711:
703:
698:
695:
692:
687:
684:
681:
676:
673:
669:
659:
655:
651:
647:
642:
641:
640:
637:
633:
629:
628:
627:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
606:
605:
604:
600:
595:
591:
586:
582:
574:
570:
566:
562:
557:
556:
555:
554:
550:
546:
541:
537:
531:
527:
523:
513:
509:
502:
498:
494:
492:
491:
487:
483:
478:
474:
462:
458:
454:
450:
443:
439:
435:
419:
415:
411:
407:
406:
405:
401:
397:
393:
392:
391:
387:
383:
379:
378:
377:
373:
369:
365:
364:
363:
359:
355:
351:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
333:
329:
323:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
308:
304:
300:
295:
290:
286:
282:
278:
277:
275:
271:
267:
266:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
244:
240:
236:
233:
227:
220:
217:
216:
214:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
190:
173:
172:
166:
163:
161:
158:
156:
153:
151:
148:
147:
145:
144:
141:
140:
136:
131:
126:
125:
118:
114:
110:
107:
105:
101:
100:
92:
88:
86:
83:
81:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
62:
58:
57:Learn to edit
54:
51:
46:
45:
42:
41:
37:
33:
29:
28:
19:
1614:
1603:
1601:
1577:for deletion
1360:
1325:
1306:Shuting23521
1274:Shuting23521
1258:Shuting23521
1256:
1244:
1243:
1238:
1235:
1226:
1223:
1220:
1213:
1197:
1075:
1072:
1009:
1006:
990:
980:
963:
959:sign up here
957:
945:
923:
903:Gerda Arendt
900:
894:Three years!
857:
847:
832:
822:sign up here
820:
808:
786:
766:Amitchell125
761:Amitchell125
746:
729:good article
723:The article
722:
697:
686:
675:
667:
578:
561:Amitchell125
545:Amitchell125
540:Amitchell125
512:good article
506:The article
505:
482:Amitchell125
477:Amitchell125
451:the article
446:
350:edit summary
242:
194:
134:
102:
1288:PR language
1236:Academics:
757:ChristieBot
751:nominate it
731:has passed
636:Igor Markov
590:Igor Markov
536:ChristieBot
473:ChristieBot
221:Removal of
668:References
328:volunteers
1612:finished.
1541:back :-)
1379:consensus
1231:801-1000.
747:bold link
691:WP:REVEXP
332:consensus
213:WP:STABLE
150:2011–2019
93:if needed
76:Be polite
36:talk page
1543:Tibesti1
1503:Tibesti1
1489:Tibesti1
1474:intforce
1460:Tibesti1
1445:intforce
1427:Tibesti1
1412:intforce
1398:Tibesti1
1383:intforce
1364:Tibesti1
1343:intforce
1292:intforce
1174:intforce
1106:intforce
1055:intforce
879:Precious
650:intforce
632:Intforce
618:intforce
461:criteria
410:intforce
396:Tibesti1
382:intforce
368:Tibesti1
354:intforce
322:Tibesti1
299:Tibesti1
288:article.
256:intforce
198:Tibesti1
135:Archives
104:Archives
61:get help
32:Intforce
30:This is
1616:Bearcat
1598:deleted
1512:Vitsuha
1357:Hamburg
1073:Hello,
1007:Hello,
646:WP:NPOV
583:of the
191:Hamburg
1507:Vienna
1129:edits:
993:buidhe
860:buidhe
737:; see
252:WP:BRD
1204:NPUST
1153:GCGOC
1138:GCGOC
1079:GCGOC
1032:GCGOC
712:Your
610:Freoh
599:Freoh
495:Your
436:Your
284:this.
269:that.
89:Seek
1620:talk
1547:talk
1516:talk
1493:talk
1478:talk
1464:talk
1449:talk
1431:talk
1416:talk
1402:talk
1387:talk
1368:talk
1347:talk
1332:talk
1310:talk
1296:talk
1282:and
1262:talk
1208:NPTU
1178:talk
1157:talk
1142:talk
1110:talk
1083:talk
1059:talk
1036:talk
907:talk
770:talk
654:talk
630:Hi @
622:talk
581:lead
565:talk
549:talk
528:and
486:talk
414:talk
400:talk
386:talk
372:talk
358:talk
303:talk
260:talk
239:lead
226:Lang
202:talk
165:2022
160:2021
155:2020
117:2022
113:2021
109:2020
78:and
962:or
764:--
608:Hi
543:--
480:--
34:'s
1622:)
1600:.
1549:)
1518:)
1495:)
1480:)
1466:)
1451:)
1433:)
1418:)
1404:)
1389:)
1370:)
1349:)
1334:)
1312:)
1298:)
1264:)
1180:)
1172:.
1159:)
1144:)
1112:)
1104:.
1085:)
1061:)
1053:.
1038:)
989:)
985:·
909:)
901:--
856:)
852:·
772:)
714:GA
656:)
648:.
624:)
567:)
551:)
497:GA
488:)
463:.
457:GA
438:GA
416:)
402:)
388:)
374:)
360:)
305:)
262:)
254:.
229:}}
223:{{
204:)
115:,
111:,
59:;
1618:(
1545:(
1514:(
1491:(
1476:(
1462:(
1447:(
1429:(
1414:(
1400:(
1385:(
1366:(
1345:(
1330:(
1308:(
1294:(
1276::
1272:@
1260:(
1176:(
1155:(
1140:(
1125:.
1108:(
1081:(
1057:(
1034:(
987:c
983:t
981:(
968:.
927:|
905:(
854:c
850:t
848:(
825:.
790:|
768:(
652:(
620:(
563:(
547:(
484:(
412:(
398:(
384:(
370:(
356:(
324::
320:@
301:(
258:(
200:(
106::
63:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
