466:
again, because they used to be my ISP and this caused numerous issues for me, trying to host servers on their DSL service. Please understand, the IP user's edit was bad, and you were right to revert it. But I am simply arguing that it in no way warranted a level-4 warning, please feel free to re-add your warning to his talk page. But I feel that the warning was too extreme for such a simple mistake, and would prefer we don't scare new users away who simply didn't know any better. A level-1 'I didn't feel your edit was constructive' with explanation of how the two words sound the same would have been far more suitable for this situation.
375:
made an innocent mistake. This IP does have constructive edits, dating back to mid 2012, I did a reverse-IP check on the address and found it belongs to 'sbcglobal.net', this is AT&T's DSL internet service, I happen to know this because they used to be my ISP as well. All of their IP's are dynamic, meaning that every time the user's ADSL modem somehow looses power and then comes back online, it receives a new IP address. The individuals who caused the past disruptive edits could easily be different from the user who now uses the address. Again, this user simply made a mistake, that by no means warranted a level-4 "Only
Warning"
511:
suicide pact, If a registered user came back after a 3 month block and being blocked 4 times and continued the edit war that they where blocked 4 times over 6 months for, the next step would be an indefinite block. Leveling a severe warning is appropriate, if you take a look at the edit history and block log. If you are just looking at the single edit that I reverted/warned about yes it is excessive, however you need to keep an eye on the big picture.
31:
1329:
other files) with similar very short deletion rationales, I don't understand the purpose. I think many people may interpret it as that their contributions are not welcomed and leave. If the policy can clearly be interptreted differently and some images may be left in articles, why keep deleting them? Please understand me (if you think I'm overreacting). --
1230:. Simply start a discussion explaining why you interpret the Knowledge giudelines as "only one cover is allowed.". If the Knowledge community decides to leave one cover per article everywhere, I will accept. Currently, I don't understand the purpose of deleting random covers from random articles. I think it only discourages editors and harms Knowledge. --
273:
1295:
seem fair to me. By the way, in this discussion I just repeated the same arguments Stefan2 had already heard from multiply editors at FfD. So it was nothing new. I don't think it's fair to chose an editor (me) and attack the editor on a user talkpage, while it all can and should be discussed at the project talkpage.--
1328:
No, it's not that simple. Different editors interpret the policy differently. There has been alternative covers that were left at FfD. The same arguments about wide distribution were repeated there. They have been repeated over and over multiple times. Stefan2 keeps nominating new and new covers (and
1294:
should propose the files for deletion at FfD instead of deleting them without discussion. Instead, it seemed like he chose to continue the discussion here. I did not refuse to discuss the topic, I just suggested that we move to the WikiProject:Music talkpage. Sorry, but one person against two did not
946:
Your mass removal of images from articles doesn't seem carefully pondered over. I don't think you should reinforce your unilateral decision by reverting. Also, you should always provide edit summaries cause I looked at your contributions and large-scale removals of text without edit summaries may not
510:
Please note that I did not mean to attack you, the issue of IP allocation is fairly complex and widely varies depending on the carrier. The edit I pointed out wasn't a faith issue, it was an example of continued edit wars over the last 6 months from the same person on the same IP address. AGF isn't a
465:
I would kindly ask you to refrain from personal attacks, I certainly not lacking knowledge in "the technical areas" as I am a professional web designer and host multiple game servers out of my own home. AT&T's DSL service releases your IP address the moment your router goes offline. Which I know,
443:
Its not always that easy, in order for me to release/change my IP address my modem must be offline for an extended period of time (Greater than 7 days). If I connect within that period my old IP address is assigned back to me and the process repeats. Very few people are willing to go offline for over
1354:
minimal usage. Including every variant isnt minimal. On specific cases where sourced third party commentary about the cover can be established and then incorperated into the article that is a different story. As the current article is written it cannot justify 7 non-free files. Unlike most things on
1264:
Er, even the Music project recognizes that alternate cover art needs strong reasoning for inclusion, and generally limit it to one additional cover if it is important. That certainly doesn't appear to be the case here. And refusing to talk about it and reverting the removals will see you blocked for
420:
Could you please explain this to me? What, specifically, makes you think that the same user maintained the same IP address? Since their block expired, this user has made nothing but constructive edits. If my main goal was to vandalize
Knowledge, I would change my IP address the moment I got blocked;
996:
doesn't say "single cover", it says "single item". There is one item discussed. (Actually, I've just understood that it's not the case, cause the DVD singles, called Single V and Event V, are separate items. Okay, it looks like the last 2 covers should be deleted. Actually, the Single V charted, so
966:
policy. Album articles can use a single cover for identification without critical commentary of the actual cover, since the article is considered critical commentary. However the inclusion of additional covers have a significantly higher bar to meet. There is zero sourced critical commentary on the
819:
Yes, this is a straight up violation. It is a list, even if its not formatted as a discography. None of the individual releases appears to be notable so we would not normally have image articles. As they are just colorized photographs, I doubt one would be able to find discussion on the cover art
1091:
Surely, the article is not about cover illustrations and not only about limited editions. The article is about a CD single that has several equally or widely distributed versions, each version having a different cover. What's a discography of "Kono Chikyū..."? It's a single, not a musical artist.
374:
Anon removed a line that he didn't think fit the category, that does not qualify as
Blanking and certainly does not warrant a level-4 vandalism warning. I reverted your edit in good faith because I believe that you simply acted too quickly, and did not mean intentionally threaten an IP editor who
133:
The discussion shouldn't be held at BOTREQ whether or not a task should be done, once a task has consensus, then go to BOTREQ and say We (provide source link to company talk page or VPP ect) have come to a conclusion and have agreement that X should be done, can a Bot operator please take care of
1313:
among several criteria. We are not attacking you. Disagreeing with your point of view is not an attack, neither is reviewing the uploads of an editor who is involved with an article which has non-free content issues, in fact it is standard practice to do such reviews when issues are discovered.
1015:
By the way, while Oricon and
Billboard mostly use the cover of Limited Edition A to identify CD singles in their charts, the Regular Edition will be the only one available in the shops after some time (it won't sell more though, cause limited editions sell much more in the first weeks after the
786:
I don't agree. A list would a discography. This is an article about a multi-volume release, containing 12 albums. Just as an article about a single album should have its cover in the infobox, I believe the same should apply here. Why not? I could create separate articles for each one, and that
405:
it might be non-static, however it does appear that the same user has maintained control of the IP address. I myself have a non-static allocated ISP however I have had the same address going on 2 years now. Assuming good faith does not require me to wait for a gunman to actually kill a person,
1001:, which says: "Minimal usage. Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information". One cover can't convey equivalent significant information, since the covers are different. The item can't be identified by one cover alone. --
1423:
And I've already said that the last two covers, of the Single V and of the Event V, can and should be deleted. They indeed represent a different item. Please delete them. I've never deleted a file, so I woulldn't want to do it myself. So, only 5 covers will remain, not 7.
1016:
release). Also, Oricon chooses other random covers elsewhere. By the way, if it will help, I can find an article mentioning the cover of Ai
Takahashi Graduation edition. It won't be critically discussed, but I'm sure it was mentioned by reliable sources that the CD had
694:
I would appreciate discussion before doing any major article revision, because what we have here is not a list or a gallery but a multi-album article. Album covers should be added to album infoboxes for better identification of the individual album being discussed.
1131:
The CD covers are covers of the same disc, one item. Your examples are different manga volumes, completely separate books, separate items. If you create a separate article for each Naruto volume, you can illustrate each of them with its own cover.
406:
brandishing a weapon around, threatening to do so is enough grounds for action. Given the repeated behavior pattern, a more severe warning was needed. The user has been blocked 4 times for this. there is no bad faith here, its just the facts.
1248:
are attacking me personally. He has just nominated another random file I uploaded for deletion. I think he has intentionally looked through my contributions. I can't explain the timing differently. I won't discuss the matter here anymore.
1191:
I think if you want to continue the discussion, it must be done on the music project talkpage. This is not a separate matter, I can't fight alone against two people for a single article. The matter should be discussed as a whole.
1055:
As far as I can see, the article is about "Kono Chikyū no Heiwa o Honki de
Negatterun da yo! Kare to Issho ni Omise ga Shitai!" and not about "Kono Chikyū no Heiwa o Honki de Negatterun da yo! Kare to Issho ni Omise ga Shitai!
134:
this?. The rest of the discussion should revolve around technical/logistical issues regarding the request. Not about attempting to find consensus. (you might be told that a wider consensus is needed first, so rinse, repeat)
876:
I've removed all except the first cover. This is essentially a discography, except that it is formatted in a different way, and cover images are not allowed in discographies. Additionally, it is a list of the disc, and per
881:, you shouldn't include images of all elements in a list. I left the first cover because articles about entertainment products typically contain one cover image, although maybe it should be moved up to the lead. --
577:
What's wrong with that? Those are ALBUM COVERS. Knowledge is full of album covers (non free images). They are perfectly fine and I'm 100% sure the band has nothing against that. So, leave those images as they are.
250:
Actually when you speak the two word they are very similarly phonetically. Having that template is useful, removing the template as an anon, without an edit summary is almost asking for a blanket revert by itself.
539:
Can I ask what do you have against my images uploaded on
Knowledge for Curve? Why don't you mind your own business and leave that page (where I worked really hard) alone? Don't you have something better to do?
444:
a week just to avoid a block on
Knowledge. If you take a look at the section on their talk page from June of last year you will see issues about "ss" transliteration. Which the IP has been doing as recently as
1373:. In this article, «the cover art implicitly satisfies the "contextual significance" NFCC criterion (NFCC#8) by virtue of the marketing, branding, and identification information that the cover conveys.» --
190:. The problem is not that the article contains too few wiki links, but rather the article needs to be expanded. Hence I would appreciate if you would be more selective in adding wikify tags. Thanks.
667:
you mentioned we currently have 182,368 links to WebCite. Where did you get that number from? I am curious about that, because I am currently drafting a proposal regarding
Knowledge and WebCite. --
1166:". I can show you many more. It's just a matter of whether editors wanted to add all covers or not. And why "even the primary"? I've already explained that these all are equally main covers. --
311:
How can you call reverting a blanking by a anon without an edit summary failing to assume good faith? Those types of edits are standard vandalism reverts that happen dozens of times per day.
1073:", or whatever you are thinking. The infobox looks like a discography of "Kono Chikyū no Heiwa o Honki de Negatterun Da yo! Kare to Issho ni Omise ga Shitai!" editions in violation of
848:? Anyway, if you guys want to remove these go ahead. I'd appreciate keeping the first one at least for identification purposes, though I still wholly disagree that this is a list.
913:
Please consider adding back at least Edward at
Rhyolite and Dunes. I don't understand your objection to these images since they are historical and relevant to the article.
285:
451:. (after the most recent block expired). That is why I am not assuming anything. I think your lack of knowledge in the technical areas is what is causing your confusion.
997:
if I really wanted, I could have created a separate page for it, but I don't think I want to do it.) But all the other covers are covers of a single item and they pass
610:
I take that personally. I will not let you ruin my work. You had zero contribution on that page. I can't accept this abusive behavior regarding my edits and uploads.
728:
I did not realize I had reverted, I was using a mobile interface. Talking a look at the article it appears that there is just a basic track listing which violates
1391:(and only one) cover image without the image having to increase the understanding of the article. However, this article has more than one cover illustration. --
1162:
The Knowledge guidelines don't say this. They don't say how much images I get. There are plenty of articles that use alternative covers. For example, "
1106:
A discography is a list of discs which have something in common. In this case, the thing which they have in common is that they contain the same music.
1286:
I acted fully in the boundaries of the Knowledge guidelines. Therefore, I think your mention of my possible blocking is not justified. I suggested in
488:
In addition, the edit you linked to where the user replaced 'Groß' with 'Gross' is another mistake in good faith, as 'ß' is in fact pronounced 'ss'
711:
235:
84:
1148:
You get 1 image/file for identification purposes. Take a look at other album pages on most you wont even see the primary alternate cover.
824:
example image to lead off the article as a representation of how all the other album covers are presented is fine, but that's it. --
1227:
929:
633:
1113:
which has well over 60 different comic book covers (one for each volume), yet only one of them is shown on the page. There is
68:
is not this properly placed? It was request for a bot to do this task and it was decided that should be request at this page.
1117:
which also has several different covers, yet only one is used in the Knowledge article. Why is this product so different? --
276:
Welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you
1350:. Take a look at minimal usage. You are not required to have 7 covers of the same thing in an article, it goes against
1429:
1410:
1378:
1334:
1300:
1254:
1235:
1208:
1197:
1171:
1137:
1097:
1046:
1025:
1006:
952:
675:
38:
281:
239:
1309:
There is no need for FfD it is the incorrect venue. There really isnt that much to discuss those images violate
746:
65:
83:
Once consensus is reached then file a BOTREQ, pointing to the discussion/RfC. Those types of discussions
1425:
1406:
1374:
1330:
1296:
1250:
1231:
1193:
1167:
1163:
1133:
1093:
1042:
1021:
1002:
948:
668:
497:
475:
430:
384:
297:
1355:
wikipedia, the burden is not on me, but rather the person who wants to include the non-free content.
925:
921:
917:
845:
751:
231:
164:
1035:
688:
615:
583:
545:
1060:
593:
187:
1396:
1360:
1319:
1216:
1153:
1122:
1082:
984:
886:
878:
867:
810:
787:
wouldn't be a list anymore, but it's also needless when these albums can be grouped together.
777:
770:
736:
729:
640:
601:
568:
556:
516:
456:
411:
365:
347:
333:
316:
256:
210:
139:
92:
47:
17:
360:
blocks the most recent of those a three month block that expired less than a month ago......
853:
792:
760:
719:
700:
490:
468:
423:
377:
290:
195:
124:
110:
73:
1041:" (23rd place), Oricon chose Limited B. It only shows that all the covers are important. --
105:
Thank you. It could be appreciated if this explanation was to be added in the first place.
1273:
832:
178:
article contains exactly one line of prose and that line contains two wiki links, one to
1066:", "Kono Chikyū no Heiwa o Honki de Negatterun da yo! Kare to Issho ni Omise ga Shitai!
745:
I'd like to get more info into the article and about each individual release with time (
1370:
1351:
1344:
1310:
998:
976:
972:
611:
579:
560:
541:
1074:
993:
963:
802:
629:
625:
277:
632:
as they are currently being used, and thus had to be removed. PS Ive file a note at
1392:
1356:
1315:
1291:
1245:
1212:
1149:
1118:
1078:
1017:
980:
882:
863:
806:
773:
732:
636:
597:
564:
512:
452:
407:
361:
343:
329:
312:
252:
206:
135:
88:
119:
Actually, I am even more confused as filing at the BOTREQ was exactly what I did.
1067:
1057:
849:
788:
756:
715:
696:
342:
Especially when the user has a history of vandalism/blanking/edit warring. ????
191:
120:
106:
69:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
769:
It might be a work in progress, but as it stands it is a list and goes against
1433:
1414:
1400:
1382:
1364:
1338:
1323:
1304:
1277:
1266:
1258:
1239:
1220:
1201:
1175:
1157:
1141:
1126:
1101:
1086:
1050:
1029:
1010:
988:
956:
933:
890:
871:
857:
836:
825:
814:
796:
781:
764:
740:
723:
704:
682:
644:
619:
605:
587:
572:
549:
520:
505:
483:
460:
438:
415:
392:
369:
351:
337:
320:
305:
260:
243:
214:
199:
175:
143:
128:
114:
96:
77:
1038:
174:
articles. In many cases, these tags are not appropriate. For example, the
171:
228:
The two words are sufficiently unlike not to require distinction message.
862:
Asking for input from others well versed in a subject isnt canvassing.
421:
That puts the address back in the pool to be assigned to someone else.
179:
1070:
1063:
979:
which covers significance, those alternate covers are just excessive.
975:
as 7 covers are not required, and thus are not minimal. It also fails
1110:
563:
is another key barrier that must be met before a file can be used.
186:. Adding more wiki links to this line would normally be considered
1114:
555:
Im sorry but it does not comply with our non-free content policy,
288:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
183:
1037:(35th place). Maybe because it sold the most copies. But for "
1034:
Actually, Oricon choose Ai Takahashi Graduation Edition here:
25:
160:
Hi. I have noticed that you have been systematically adding
749:). Same with other similar releases by this artist, such as
1109:
Compare with other similar articles. For example, there is
280:
while interacting with other editors, which you did not on
1287:
842:
664:
448:
357:
326:
205:
Sorry about that I was taking suggestions from AWB.
592:Since I wont edit war with you I am taking this to
1405:It doesn't say "one". Where does it say "one"? --
634:Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content#Curve_.28band.29
1265:editing warring against established policy. --
1207:This has already been discussed ad nauseum see
947:look like good-faith edits at first glance. --
596:this is a classic case of unacceptable usage.
8:
801:The images look like a clear violation of
1209:Knowledge:Fair use overuse#Prior debates
325:And now you are really confusing me, as
971:other covers you are adding. It fails
820:to otherwise support their inclusion.
710:Please undo your revert and adhere to
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
64:Hi, Werieth. Why you are saying that
7:
942:Mass removal of images from articles
962:Actually it is, take a look at our
1387:That's the footnote which permits
714:before making such changes again.
24:
1226:You can start a discussion here:
1228:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Music
327:you called my warning good faith
271:
29:
559:is a good place to start, and
1:
1434:16:46, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1415:16:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1401:16:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1383:16:42, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1371:the footnote No. 1 at WP:NFCI
1365:16:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1339:16:25, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1324:15:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1305:15:33, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1278:15:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1259:14:45, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1244:Sorry, it looks like you and
1240:14:45, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1221:14:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1202:14:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1176:14:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1158:13:55, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1142:14:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1127:13:36, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1102:13:21, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1087:13:09, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1051:12:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1030:12:11, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1011:12:03, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
989:11:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
957:05:20, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
934:23:44, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
891:22:06, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
872:18:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
858:18:44, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
837:17:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
815:17:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
797:17:26, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
782:16:42, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
765:16:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
741:16:16, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
724:15:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
705:13:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
683:13:17, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
645:00:05, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
620:23:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
606:23:56, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
588:23:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
573:23:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
550:23:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
521:03:20, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
506:22:19, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
484:22:13, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
461:21:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
439:21:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
416:21:37, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
393:21:30, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
370:21:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
352:21:19, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
338:21:18, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
321:21:17, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
306:21:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
261:18:06, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
244:17:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
215:14:21, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
200:09:58, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
144:18:48, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
129:18:43, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
115:18:41, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
97:18:37, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
78:18:32, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1460:
225:My edit was not vandalsm.
282:User talk:108.234.185.147
87:of the Bot request page.
747:Knowledge:WORKINPROGRESS
630:non-free content policy
628:. Those files fail our
1164:Risk (Megadeth album)
284:. Take a look at the
42:of past discussions.
752:The Ultimate Edition
663:At the village pump
182:, and the second to
689:La Vie Electronique
85:go beyond the scope
659:WebCite link count
1426:Moscow Connection
1407:Moscow Connection
1375:Moscow Connection
1343:FfD isnt policy,
1331:Moscow Connection
1297:Moscow Connection
1288:this edit summary
1251:Moscow Connection
1232:Moscow Connection
1194:Moscow Connection
1168:Moscow Connection
1134:Moscow Connection
1094:Moscow Connection
1043:Moscow Connection
1022:Moscow Connection
1003:Moscow Connection
949:Moscow Connection
937:
920:comment added by
278:assume good faith
234:comment added by
54:
53:
48:current talk page
18:User talk:Werieth
1451:
1270:
1020:on the cover. --
936:
914:
829:
679:
672:
504:
501:
494:
482:
479:
472:
437:
434:
427:
391:
388:
381:
304:
301:
294:
275:
274:
246:
169:
163:
156:Underlinked tags
33:
32:
26:
1459:
1458:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1268:
944:
915:
827:
692:
677:
670:
661:
537:
499:
492:
489:
477:
470:
467:
432:
425:
422:
386:
379:
376:
299:
292:
289:
272:
269:
236:108.234.185.147
229:
223:
167:
161:
158:
66:this discussion
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1457:
1455:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1281:
1280:
1224:
1223:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1107:
1032:
1013:
943:
940:
939:
938:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
691:
686:
660:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
536:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
486:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
268:
265:
264:
263:
222:
221:Profit/Prophet
219:
218:
217:
157:
154:
153:
152:
151:
150:
149:
148:
147:
146:
100:
99:
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1456:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1422:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1353:
1349:
1346:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1312:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1247:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1069:
1065:
1062:
1059:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1033:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1014:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
995:
992:
991:
990:
986:
982:
978:
974:
970:
965:
961:
960:
959:
958:
954:
950:
941:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
912:
892:
888:
884:
880:
875:
874:
873:
869:
865:
861:
860:
859:
855:
851:
847:
844:
840:
839:
838:
834:
830:
823:
818:
817:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
799:
798:
794:
790:
785:
784:
783:
779:
775:
772:
768:
767:
766:
762:
758:
754:
753:
748:
744:
743:
742:
738:
734:
731:
727:
726:
725:
721:
717:
713:
709:
708:
707:
706:
702:
698:
690:
687:
685:
684:
681:
680:
674:
673:
666:
658:
646:
642:
638:
635:
631:
627:
623:
622:
621:
617:
613:
609:
608:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
590:
589:
585:
581:
576:
575:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
553:
552:
551:
547:
543:
534:
522:
518:
514:
509:
508:
507:
503:
502:
496:
495:
487:
485:
481:
480:
474:
473:
464:
463:
462:
458:
454:
450:
447:
442:
441:
440:
436:
435:
429:
428:
419:
418:
417:
413:
409:
404:
394:
390:
389:
383:
382:
373:
372:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
354:
353:
349:
345:
341:
340:
339:
335:
331:
328:
324:
323:
322:
318:
314:
310:
309:
308:
307:
303:
302:
296:
295:
287:
283:
279:
267:February 2013
266:
262:
258:
254:
249:
248:
247:
245:
241:
237:
233:
226:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
203:
202:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
166:
155:
145:
141:
137:
132:
131:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
116:
112:
108:
104:
103:
102:
101:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
81:
80:
79:
75:
71:
67:
59:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1388:
1347:
1243:
1225:
1190:
1018:Ai Takahashi
968:
945:
916:— Preceding
821:
750:
693:
676:
669:
662:
538:
498:
491:
476:
469:
445:
431:
424:
385:
378:
298:
291:
286:welcome page
270:
230:— Preceding
227:
224:
159:
63:
55:
43:
37:
624:Please see
446:14 days ago
188:overlinking
165:Underlinked
60:Bot request
36:This is an
1075:WP:NFC#UUI
922:Backstrand
879:WP:NFLISTS
846:canvassing
803:WP:NFC#UUI
771:WP:NFLISTS
755:. Thanks.
730:WP:NFLISTS
557:WP:NFLISTS
449:5 days ago
176:AGK (gene)
1352:WP:NFCC#3
1311:WP:NFCC#8
1039:Help Me!!
999:WP:NFCC#3
977:WP:NFCC#8
973:WP:NFCC#3
678:Yamaguchi
612:Deepblue1
580:Deepblue1
561:WP:NFCC#8
542:Deepblue1
172:Gene Wiki
930:contribs
918:unsigned
232:unsigned
170:tags to
1393:Stefan2
1357:Werieth
1345:WP:NFCC
1316:Werieth
1292:Werieth
1246:Stefan2
1213:Werieth
1150:Werieth
1119:Stefan2
1079:Stefan2
1061:irasuto
981:Werieth
883:Stefan2
864:Werieth
807:Stefan2
774:Werieth
733:Werieth
637:Werieth
598:Werieth
565:Werieth
513:Werieth
453:Werieth
408:Werieth
362:Werieth
344:Werieth
330:Werieth
313:Werieth
253:Werieth
207:Werieth
180:protein
136:Werieth
89:Werieth
39:archive
1111:Naruto
1077:§2. --
1068:gentei
1058:hyōshi
994:WP:NFC
964:WP:NFC
850:Jmj713
841:Isn't
805:§2. --
789:Jmj713
757:Jmj713
716:Jmj713
697:Jmj713
671:Toshio
626:WP:OWN
594:WT:NFC
500:hadley
478:hadley
433:hadley
387:hadley
300:hadley
192:Boghog
121:Beagel
107:Beagel
70:Beagel
1369:Read
1290:that
1115:Kanon
535:Curve
493:Moose
471:Moose
426:Moose
380:Moose
293:Moose
16:<
1430:talk
1411:talk
1397:talk
1379:talk
1361:talk
1335:talk
1320:talk
1301:talk
1269:ASEM
1255:talk
1236:talk
1217:talk
1198:talk
1172:talk
1154:talk
1138:talk
1123:talk
1098:talk
1083:talk
1047:talk
1026:talk
1007:talk
985:talk
953:talk
926:talk
887:talk
868:talk
854:talk
843:this
828:ASEM
811:talk
793:talk
778:talk
761:talk
737:talk
720:talk
701:talk
665:here
641:talk
616:talk
602:talk
584:talk
569:talk
546:talk
517:talk
457:talk
412:talk
366:talk
348:talk
334:talk
317:talk
257:talk
240:talk
211:talk
196:talk
184:gene
140:talk
125:talk
111:talk
93:talk
74:talk
1389:one
1071:ban
1064:shū
822:One
712:BRD
356:PS
1432:)
1424:--
1413:)
1399:)
1381:)
1363:)
1348:is
1337:)
1322:)
1303:)
1276:)
1257:)
1249:--
1238:)
1219:)
1211:.
1200:)
1192:--
1174:)
1156:)
1140:)
1132:--
1125:)
1100:)
1092:--
1085:)
1049:)
1028:)
1009:)
987:)
955:)
932:)
928:•
889:)
870:)
856:)
835:)
813:)
795:)
780:)
763:)
739:)
722:)
703:)
643:)
618:)
604:)
586:)
571:)
548:)
519:)
459:)
414:)
368:)
350:)
336:)
319:)
259:)
242:)
213:)
198:)
168:}}
162:{{
142:)
127:)
113:)
95:)
76:)
1428:(
1409:(
1395:(
1377:(
1359:(
1333:(
1318:(
1299:(
1274:t
1272:(
1267:M
1253:(
1234:(
1215:(
1196:(
1170:(
1152:(
1136:(
1121:(
1096:(
1081:(
1045:(
1024:(
1005:(
983:(
969:6
951:(
924:(
885:(
866:(
852:(
833:t
831:(
826:M
809:(
791:(
776:(
759:(
735:(
718:(
699:(
639:(
614:(
600:(
582:(
567:(
544:(
515:(
455:(
410:(
364:(
358:4
346:(
332:(
315:(
255:(
238:(
209:(
194:(
138:(
123:(
109:(
91:(
72:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.