Knowledge

User talk:Werieth/201304

Source 📝

216:
being uncicivil or rude, no, sorry. I asked, WTF are you doing.....While you are within policy bounds to perform the actions and I now understand them, it would have far more civil and (even gasp) POLITE to have explained the policy because, odds are, most people do not know the policy and ask, WTF does that mean etc etc. You CHOSE to just remove the images with no heads up, no hey how are you no here is what the policy means etc etc. IN FACT, had you just stated, Wow, you cant have this specific image in your userpace, I would have replied, Cool, I did not know that, thank you for letting me know. That way, I could probably let others know as well. There are in the real world no laws which require me to say excuse me, no laws which state I cant fart in an elevator, no laws which state I have to hold a door, BUT, as a civil peron in a social environment, I follow basic rules. I am at this moment UNinvolved in this discussion. I will state in utter clarity, that I would rather be polite AND civil, because my soul is not made of dogshit
3325:- a discussion in which only two people opined and one of them (you) closed the discussion is not anything that would remotely resemble a binding discussion. The other one is more meaningful, but even in that discussion, the failure to affirmatively amend a rule to explicitly permit something is not the same as an allowance for summary deletion of the same. Also, some in that discussion opposed the rule not because they necessarily agreed or disagreed with bank notes in articles, but because they thought the rule was overreaching. While I don't see a need to revert your non-admin closure of the discussion, especially since it focused largely on issues that are not in question (ie, whether the images are public domain or not), I am restoring the images to the article and will nominate them for deletion in an orderly process. Representative samples can be chosen to be kept or the deletion discussion could result in all of them being deleted. -- 178:. I shall remain civil. While you are by rule not obligated to be civil in letting people know that you are changing user boxes, per policy of course. Civility, would assume that any person would have the base instinct to say, golly, I am about to change thousands of images. While a person does not own their user page, it is again, basic civility to not snidely drop a link and walk away. AND yes, it was snide. Believe it or not, MOSt people, on Knowledge and the real world do not quote a policy link and walk away. The logic of thi encyclopedia is to encourage editing. I cant tell you how inspiring it is, toquote a policy and then chide me about how I dont own it, with yet another policy quote......Pardon me while I wipe the sweat of eager anticipation off of my brow.... 2587:. I'm currently reworking an article in there, and so I'd copied the content over from the existing article, including the non-free image. You're right in that it shouldn't be there, but I wonder if future you could go down the route I've used? Instead of deleting it, I've commented it out, so it doesn't appear in the content. This way, when I go to instate my changes, all I've got to do is remove commenting, rather than find the image I want, and retype the code for it. It doesn't add too much work on your end, and it would save other users a lot of hassle. Thanks. 160:. Just because an image is on wikipedia does not mean it can be used on your user page. Only free media can be. As for notifying you it is not required, and doubles the amount of work necessary for someone cleaning up the violations there where over 700 such violations when I started. Most are quite harmless mistakes by users who are not familiar with the policy. If you have questions please let me know, and remember to please remain civil at all times. 4360: 31: 1799: 939: 891: 1256:
frustrating on the people trying to create something new to be able to un-comment or remove the extra : later when it actually is submitted/moved to mainspace. If not, that is fine, I figured it wouldn't hurt to ask. I use AWB on another wiki (awaiting approval here - put on hold because of a recent issue I had) so I'm not sure if that particular part to do that is coded into AWB or a simple
2705: 3645: 3498:
from the uploader. I don't think that we should provide any images of coins for which we don't have any permission from the photographer (unless it would for some reason be impossible to take new photos of the item but that shouldn't be the case for any normal coins). Apart from that, we have the same currency issue as with banknotes which we would need to settle. --
283: 3889: 199:
edits to do what should not be necessary in the first place. When removing a file from non-articles leaving a pointer to the relevant policy which explains why said removal was done is sufficient. There isn't a need to double ones work just to leave a nice pretty note on someone's talk page. We have edit summaries for a reason, and I use them for that.
2867: 2853: 979:. No consensus has been reached. I am a little bothered that in the week I was gone, the discussion was closed ... without a consensus, but I'd like to move forward. I suggest we find a neutral place to arbitrate this because the discussion has now become circular. Please leave your thoughts in the State articles section. Thanks. -- 3445:
it is in the law. That court case only applied to 2D objects and our own lawyer specifically said not to apply it to coins. So I'm really not comfortable in just assuming it doesn't apply to scans. I agree with Stefan2, though - it's moot in this case since the uploader and scanner are the same person. --
3497:
The coins are obviously scanned by the uploader. The uploader knows that they are scans and the scanner EXIF tells that they were scanned on the day they were uploaded. One coin has no EXIF, but it is reasonable that the uploader scanned that one too. If needed, it may be possible to obtain a licence
3444:
in my dining room. Were I to take a photograph of one of them with my camera, I am choosing angle and lighting, yet we would all agree that my photograph is not protected by copyright. The reason that "slavish reproductions" are not protected by copyright is the result of a court case - not because
3259:
And even your argument in the RfC was based on a misconception. You say they're against NFLISTS, but look back in the archives to when NFLISTS was adopted, and you'll find Currency articles cited as an example of where the NFC was roundly considered to be okay, where NFLISTS was never intended to be
2958:
as a third party to a discussion which I feel is nearing an impasse. I feel confident that if you chose to participate, your comments ideas and suggestions will be neutral and non-biased in favor or against either of the currently involved participants. If you do not wish to participate, I understand
2243:
has not been met." By whose standards? Yours? Could it be that you are wrong? Is the understanding of a historic neighborhood not enhanced by images of that neighborhood? You have deleted historic documentation on an important part of the City of Dallas that would have been of interest to generations
1541:
if u can not provide, then do not delete it simple. do ur editing and do not interfere in my editing. i am here to contribute to WIKIPEDIA for myself and others. so please do not disturb me. i have been contributing here for past 1 year and want to continue. if users like u keep on disturbing then it
215:
INVALID. I asked you to review the policy on dont be a dick, I did not call you a dick, implicitly or explicitly. As to the word, fuck, I did indeed ask, WTF, this is not a censured environment. The word fuck can be used in many many ways, and while you might want me to say that to you and claim I am
1741:
I now understand which part is the problem. This is the first time I encountered that and had to do some reading. I am not the one who included those images in the article or the uploader. I only upload my own pictures or public domain pictures. I wished you'd be more specific on what the problem
1265:
we could put a note someplace that tells people to link their images with the extra : in front and when we approve the submission automatically fix those to show images instead of link them. I feel like I'm rambling now so I'll just say thanks for your time considering this, and feel free to ask if
2419:
I made changes. Could you have a look? I have 4 right now that seemed to represent the description (still being revised...had to remove the marketing fluff and all), but are still a limited use. I'm open to more edits with the image use; just thought I'd give that a try and get feedback. Thanks
4399:
OK, guess I didn't see the code attached to the pix; but others in the same series, which are the official painted portraits of LGs, are used for other people on that table, same artist seems like too. Why are these blocked from use when others from the same series by the same portrait artist are
3406:
Do you know that to be the case? The only thing I know is copies of 2D objects = okay, while copies of 3D objects != okay. Do you know for sure (with a citation to a court ruling or some such thing) that this rule is only for photographs and not for scans? I can't think of anything magical about
1698:
I reverted your edit on Bicol Region after you removed the seals to identify provinces. The fourth line on the Fair Use Rationale on seal for Albay, Camarines Norte, Catanduanes and Masbate indicates in articles encompassing the LGUs (local govenrment unit). Those provinces (LGUs) are parts of the
1678:
Just wanted to say thank you for removing the non-free images from all the userboxes I created yesterday, I had no idea that only certain images could be used, I had assumed that all images on Knowledge were available but now see the difference. I have changed the images in all of the userboxes to
1582:
I'm sorry, Arja, but that's not how it works. For copyright reasons, images that have been uploaded as non-free cannot be used outside of the main articles they were uploaded for. We don't have the copyright permissions to use images like that one outside of a very specific set of circumstances,
511:
Thanks for cleaning up these pages! These files used to be removed automatically by bot everyday, but the bot stopped doing this when one of the toolservers broke down last year, and the violations have since increased in numbers. I often see non-free files in userspace or AfC drafts when checking
128:
The images used have been shared for Knowledge to use. A WV County logo, is free use (as it pertains to the specific Copyright of non free use) in short, I dont have a publication I am using it in, look at the policy concerning the specific image. You have deleted thousands of images, WHAT are you
2654:
mode? I've got quite a bit going on at the moment, and I doubt I would have noted that the image had gone because I'm working at the bottom of the page in question. As such, I'd have had to go back quite a way to find the right code if I hadn't flicked to my watchlist at the right moment. Vandals
198:
and called me a dick. I however have remained calm, and attempted to explain policy to you. 99% of the removals no one has issues with, however on occasion there are a few users that do not understand policy, or decide to cause drama over it. With 700+ removals needed I am not going to make 1400+
3224:
Okay. So the first RfC didn't even ask the question -- it asked a completely different, half-baked, stupid question. And the second RfC only had two respondents -- one of whom was you, who then went on to close your own Rfc while it was on an archive page, an RfC which it seems I wasn't the only
2115:
You indiscriminately deleted all the historic images from the Wynnewood, Dallas article. For one of these images, official permission to use it on Knowledge was obtained from the Dallas Public Library, and that permission is documented in the copyright information. What is your justification for
3770:
I've just asked that you inform the person most concerned and discussed the issue, and you've started edit warring and being rather "forward." Do please look at the other comments around this one - I'm not the only one to see this problem. Maybe you should consider just calling it a day today -
2304:
was met or not, I was urging caution and humility regarding one's own judgment. Perhaps you should await some discussion on this topic, in its specific relation to the article under discussion, before summarily deleting material which was intended to make historic documents available to future
1224:
Ahhh... It's an AfC article... Yeah... That reminds me that I had a question I wanted to ask you about that. Is it against policy (since it doesn't seem really clear to me) for articles in User: drafts or WP:AfC drafts to have the linking text for the files on the page and commented out using
2478:
I have been advised that the publisher has sent an updated paperback image to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with permission <<to publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0" (unported) and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no
480:
and can understand your viewpoint; however, the use of an unordered bulleted list suggests an "or" scenario in the section just above which defeats the purpose if the statement you are refering to. Might I suggest changing it to an ordered list instead to suggest an "and" scenerio or possibly
3391:
Sorry; in this case there is no photographer's copyright, because the pics were just scans made completely mechanically by placing the coins on a scanner. So the issues are very similar. (Though some may argue as that knowledge of banknote designs or knowledge of coin designs has different
1771:
which requires the non-free media to be used in a manner that non-having it hurts the understanding of the article. Those logos where being used as just a quick visual identification for the cities, yes having the logos are nice, but not required. Excluding those logos also does not harm the
1255:
Would you be willing to slightly modify your AWB script to link them on pages that are "under construction" as described above to link instead of delete? I had to undo a couple of your bot edits to my User: drafts the other day and add the comment wrappers. It just makes it easier and less
2842:
The gallery of styles that I added to the entry on Sam Francis was added at the specific request of the Sam Francis foundation, which has paid me to add to the Sam Francis entry. I had some trouble figuring out exactly how to justify the copyright of the images, and went with the "free use"
2365:
I'm working on the description for the design and the accompanying photos. I've been picking up an idea of how it's done elsewhere in the other pages I've been working on, and reviewing the Knowledge style info, etc. I cut the images that I downloaded down to a representative set for the
1327:
I'm working on the description for the design and the accompanying photos. I've been picking up an idea of how it's done elsewhere in the other pages I've been working on, and reviewing the Knowledge style info, etc. I cut the images that I downloaded down to a representative set for the
4277:
The image is placed in an article discussing Savez izviđača Bosne i Hercegovine, a subject of public interest. The significance of the logo is to help the reader identify the organization, assure the readers that they have reached the right article containing critical commentary about the
3376:
Coins are sometimes tricker, because there may be photographer's copyright in the photography of a 3D object (according to Mike Godwin in the past). If the pics are free, but of unfree objects, then the case is similar. But if the pics are not free, that probably raises other issues.
1655:
now no worries. i have contributed quite a lot but do not know each and everything on wikipedia and do not have time also to read each and everything. earlier i was not knowing how to find a free image for me and thats why i asked werieth to do so for me. but now i have done on my
3407:
the choice of equipment that would make one copyrightable and the other not. To use a crude example that is occasionally the subject of workplace humor, were I to sit on the photocopier and photocopy my rear end, we would all, I would assume, agree that this is copyrightable. --
274:
Something as simple as that would have prevented me from using the file, or properly requesting use of it up front. It is very agitating to invest time and effort into something and have it reverted or deleted outright. That line in those templates used on those types of files
3305:
Can I suggest that rather than closing an RfC on an archive page, where there had been only two participants, one of whom was your very self, and it now seems that most people had never even seen it, the appropriate action would have been to re-list if for further discussion?
1766:
which requires as little non-free media as possible, and each piece that is used is only used as little as needed. In this case the logos are OK in the specific cities, but not acceptable to also include in the regional article. The second major factor that comes into play is
129:
doing ?????????? I researched every image on MY user page. I cant tell you how HELPFUL it is to be given NO heads up, NO warning, just a kiss off and removal. Thats NOT cool. In fact, its rude as hell. There are efficient and intelligent ways to inform people of such actions
2305:
generations. Is the omission of illustrations regarding a historic neighborhood detrimental to understanding that neighborhood? I would argue that your judgment that this is not the case is highly constestable. Your eagerness to delete valuable material perplexes me.
629:
Since Knowledge is a namespace, Templates is a namespace, WikiPortal is a namespace, WikiProject is a namespace, Category is a Namespace, Talk is a namespace, userpage is a namespace and I believe you get the idea where I am going with this right? Since all of these
3421:
The copyright with 3d as opposed to 2d is supposed to reflect the artistic choices that the photographer has had to make -- eg angle, lighting etc. On the other hand, just pressing a button on a scanner/photocopier is called "slavish mechanical reproduction".
2649:
It just seems there could quite easily be a little kinder on editors who are attempting to improve a page. I understand your reversion issue, but is there possibly a way that certain users could 'opt out' of deletion, and mark our pages in a way that enables a
2846:
I have re-instated the gallery, and will be happy to provide any documentation (etc) to help clear these images for copyright. If you, or any other wikipedia editor wants to confirm that the estate wishes to see these images used, they can be contacted at:
4243:
The fair use rationale currently tells that "The image is placed in the infobox at the top of the article". However, I have to scroll down quite a lot to see the image. Don't you see how wrong the fair use rationale is? Also, the logos obviously violate
3567:
You seem to be wrong in your stated reason for removing these pix - there are statements on them of why these non-free images can be used. Perhaps you should go back over them and restate your case. In any case, please inform the uploader (most likely
3009:
I actually ignore the file namespace. Due to the inconsistent way MediaWiki handles file usages, you often see false positives and other issues to the point that trying to process that namespace is a time sink with little to no visible results.
2911:. Please note that the original work does not need to be released but rather just a smaller version suitable for the internet would be fine. For how to confirm this and ensure that all necessary paperwork is on file to avoid further issues see 71:- but if you check the permissions given, you'll see that use of that logo is specifically allowed for the Project page as well as for the article on the club itself. No harm done, I've reinstated it. Please contact me if you need more info. 3280:
a re-hash of the List of X characters and discography debates. At the end of those discussions, when NFLISTS was adopted, the currency articles were seen and discussed as clearly appopriate use, to which it was not intended to be applied.
2116:
deleting it? Detailed rationales have been provided for the other historic images. (Clearly, an entry on a historic neighborhood is incomplete without some illustrations.) Please be more careful before destroying valuable hitoric evidence.
3805:
Please do not remove images without discussion when you have already been reverted once. People actually are watching this article, and are willing to add a fair use rationale if you would stop trying to remove it without discussion.
1757:
If you have questions feel free to ask, non-free content is a very complex issue that is easy to misunderstand. Basically, just because a rationale exists does not make said rationale valid. In order to make it valid it needs to meet
1260:
search replace (which I am assuming it is). However, if my assumption is wrong, and it's part of AWB's automatic cleanup function, I would be willing to submit a suggestion/request to the AWB team to make the modification (and at
539:
article. There are four sections in the article referring to four time periods and styles of the artist's career. The use of one image per section is not excessive. You said "Please stop re-inserting the files, you are not meeting
3116:
This is exactly the kind of case, where it is roundly agreed that there is no legal issue and no NFCC #1 issue, and where the images are manifestly informative about the subject of the article, where we purposely *do* allow NFC.
1949:
I see you have been removed the file above from the infoboxes of a number of articles regarding "missing non-free use rationale's" is there a reason why on the file itself a Fair use rationale cannot be added for every article?
2655:
already cause us enough work as it is without them indirectly adding to our workload... On a similar note, would your script pick up the image in my sandbox even though it's commented out, or does it only see live connections?
3650: 2987: 1280:
Ive found that removal is just about the only method that works reliable without breaking stuff. Having a : doesnt always work, and I am not a big fan of leaving a ton of HTML in my wake just to clutter the edit window.
993:
Hello, I am JoshBlitz, creator of History of The Beatles, and, first of all, what did you think of my article? Also, you deleted photos that were previously used on wikipedia. May I ask why? The photos were on the other
4133:
for the second article. Is this going to suffice? Is there a preferred way to add a second rationale? Perhaps instead of stripping the images out of pages and angering people, you could add the second template
2194:
What is your rationale for removing a file for which permission to publish it on Knowledge has been obtained? In my opinion, what you are doing is vandalism, and unless you restore the file, I will report you.
3459:
Google for "'slavish copy'" or "'mechanical reproduction' copyright" then. It's an established principle that such things do not get copyright. As to photos of 2d pictures, read the text of the decisions in
2632: 3648:
Thank you for contributing to Knowledge. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically
1638:
bit overzealous in tone, particularly when they reverted the addition without noticing it was a different image. But everyone was acting in good faith, and no harm intended or done, so no worries, right? :)
2445:
Thank you for checking my article but I have a question about it. For some reason my family tree's of George Harrison and Ringo Starr are under the wrong section. Once you get to my article you'll see why,
4152: 3046:
Hi... I just saw that you tagged World_One_Mumbai.png for deletion. I would like to know what is missing from that image description, I have clearly mentioned in image summary about uses and why its used
3727:
Most of the time the uploader has nothing to do with the NFCC violations as they uploaded and used it on a single article, someone else comes along and adds the file to a second article without meeting
3464:-- they fundamentally turn on whether what was being done was a slavish mechanical reproduction. Remember that there may be a difference of opinion on this between the U.S. and the U.K. In the U.S. 2375:
I'm happy to consider the best way to display images for the design/construction section, but I don't think they should all go. If you can provide some help and advice, I'd appreciate it a lot! --
1337:
I'm happy to consider the best way to display images for the design/construction section, but I don't think they should all go. If you can provide some help and advice, I'd appreciate it a lot! --
1064:
the other day. I suggest if you think that yours were deleted accidentally or without justification, then you should redlink the pictures here for Werieth to review your claim. Happy editing!
3900:
or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Knowledge, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
2528:
I have found the ticket and have carried out the following actions. The original file on Knowledge has been deleted and the new file that was received has been uploaded to wikimedia commons
544:" I specifically edited the rationale for non free use for each of the images to meet your standards, please specify why they were deleted again, what am I missing that does not comply to 2320: 3132: 1391:
but didn't see any info regarding the file's usage in a sandbox. Does the fact that it's in my sandbox not allow me some grace in terms of time to finish what i was working on? Cheers.
1875:
That warning was about upload or usage of non-free media. I actually dont need to write a rationale, the burden is on those who want to use the media. In this case I doubt it passes
4009:
sets the minimum as one. Am I to understand that you keep removing the files because the template is wrong? Wouldn't it be less contentious to fix the template on the image file? --
1504:
so it is easily fixable when you move the article to article space, you may also add an extra : before the word File to link the file and not have it transcluded like ] which gives
1451:
i would request u not to change my user page, but if u r still doing citing some reason. then i want u to provide me a free image of mumbai university so that i can use it.
1018:, per our policy they can only be used in the article space. As for the article, I have not read it, but it is about 300Kb which puts it about 7 times larger than optimal. 3901: 4328:
The logo you keep removing from the Melbourne tram articles only consists of typefaces, individual words and simple geometric shapes and is therefore Public Domain - see
2481:
I haven't yet figured out the WP documentation on using such images. Can you point me to help with finding this new image in wikimedia and including it in the article?
2175:
an article with far more history and importance, There are 95 files used on that page, 0 are non-free. The justification for a minor town that needs 7? doesnt exist.
1587:
against the law, but Knowledge's copyright policy is intentionally much stricter than copyright law, to ensure that we stay well clear of actually breaking the law.)
254:
profile. I was quite upset, and about to ream you a new one... However, after following the link to the sections pertaining it, I would instead like to request that
327:. To my knowledge every non-free file has that or similar wording. But a general rule is when using or re-using any non-free media is to ensure that every use meets 4380:
I've mentioned you in the discussion and think you might like to offer your own comments, so I'm posting this talkback to let you know about it! Happy editing!
1843:
I warned you about adding non-free files without rationales 10 minutes before you wrote it, and 18 minutes after you added it to the article without a rationale.
1033:
But I got those pictures from Wikimedia Commons! The plaque one is from Wikimedia Commons. It says on the bottom that I am free to share and copy the picture. It
149: 4033:). Its not a matter of just updating a template. The file is being used on multiple pages. Each use requires a separate rationale and to meet all 10 points of 581:
article. They have similar if not less detailed rationales for free-use, and are used in the exact same way to illustrate periods the artist's career. Thanks.
4082: 3468:
set out that the photo of the 2d object did not meet the standards of creativity required for copyright. In the U.K. most legal opinion is that such photos
1262: 3341: 3322: 3188: 3185: 1634:
for taking the time to find a free image to use in your userbox instead; that image you have now will do nicely. Werieth meant well, but was perhaps a
729: 4336:
at all. I have retagged the logo file and moved it to Commons accordingly, and will also restore it to all the Melbourne tram articles in due course.
4373: 3904:
which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
2912: 2908: 2904: 2447: 512:
new files, but I often don't have time to do more than tagging the files as orphaned if they don't also appear somewhere in the article namespace. --
4284: 4148: 3971: 3881: 660:
Only non-free images are disallowed outside of the main article space. Freely-licensed images can be used anywhere. There is a distinction there.
448:
Werieth is correct; non-free files cannot be used outside of main articles, not even on AfC submissions, subpages, or user drafts. No exceptions.
365:
which I have copied and pasted onto my subpage for editing prior to R.F.C. status. Please make sure you do research prior to deletion. Thank you.
68: 3657:. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our 2394: 2300:
I am not sure that you have understood my point, or at least all of it. When I asked about the source of your certainty as to whether criterion
1356: 2397:
is the only file that might pass it. That file can be used either in the infobox, or the section but not both. The rest of the files will fail
1359:
is the only file that might pass it. That file can be used either in the infobox, or the section but not both. The rest of the files will fail
556: 2990:: there has been a non-free file on the file information page since January 2013. I think that it is very good that you are fixing the other 1123: 1103: 2819: 86:
It does not matter if permission was given unless that file is released under a free license it cannot be used outside of the article, see
4144: 4120: 3953: 3938: 279:" reduce some of the hurt feelings and rantings such as ctg has posted above, unless your some sicko that is into that sort of thing (j/k 3662: 2078:"Description" should specify the edition, if known, for the article caption—where we hope to be able to say "Cover of first edition". -- 3987:
Thus my comment is correct, before reverting me blindly please take some time to familiarize yourself with out non-free content policy
488: 294: 715:
So, basically your saying that picture are copyrighted. Then I suggest, as honest and non threatening, take down all pictures due to
156:
which limits the usage of non-free media to article only. It was not shared for wikipedia to use, we are using it under the terms of
4177:
If you cannot come up with a very strong reason, dont include the image. That reason should then be able to fill the purpose field.
4127: 4074: 3095: 2815: 2260: 1646: 1594: 976: 669: 457: 3699:
Please do not presume to order me with a sentence like "Do not re-insert." You have been reverted - please take actions like these
2093:
Ive been getting them from Google, using the ISBN provided in the article. (I do include the year of publication, and publisher).
2327:
without it not possible? Answer nothing. it makes the article look prettier yes but is not required to understand the history of
3918:
The files that I removed from those articles where removed for missing non-free use rationales, which is required by policy see
4366: 4359: 4283:
sounds like it is referring to Savez izviđača Bosne i Hercegovine, while the logo is for another group. If the logo is not for
2800: 1742:
is, but of course, you don't have to. I donate my time in Knowledge to relax, not to argue. But thanks for pointing that out.
1403: 839:
No, its just the ones that cannot remain civil and expect others to walk through hoops and do twice as much work as necessary.
1911:
Sorry but I accidentally reverted your removal of the image. Finger trouble on a small screen. Have reverted my own revision.
2955: 1822: 1143: 4070: 3893: 1192: 1172: 1152: 1132: 1112: 474: 258: 2843:
alternative. It truly seems to me that this is an appropriate rationale, so I am disappointed that you deleted my work.
2323:
why does the article require that particular image? What critical information does this portray that makes understanding
358: 2792: 1467: 945:
Thank you for cleaning up the stupid default setting I get at my computer, and given the international address instead.
2371:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2013_April_6#File:Museum_of_the_American_Revolution_Location_1.jpg
1522:
Technical 13, Please review the facts before commenting, in this case the user was using a non-free file in a userbox.
1333:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2013_April_6#File:Museum_of_the_American_Revolution_Location_1.jpg
3693:"May fail our non-free image policy" is quite different than "does fail" - it needs to be discussed, not just removed. 2761: 2475: 1498: 1055: 853:
PS in regards to your email, No real changes are needed in the template, however I did suggest an additional point on
733: 247: 4278:
organization, and illustrate the organization's intended branding message in a way that words alone could not convey.
3961: 1082:
and cannot delete any content. I did prevent a large number of non-free files from being displayed in non-articles.
975:. I just returned from my vacation and was tidying up some things IRL. I understand that we have different views on 4322: 3532:
article. Please review and respond to my comments on the article's talk page before reinstating your edit. Thanks.
3437: 1183: 481:
removing the list all together and formatting it as a sentence or two? Thank you for your time and consideration.
319: 38: 2584: 1828:
Hi. I added the rationale ten minutes ago. If can't see it, try bypassing your web browser's cache. Best regards,
571: 4191:
You didn't actually answer my question as to whether or not use of the template was what you were looking for. --
3837: 3811: 3752:. By adding them back to the article you are violating the non-free content policy which is why I warned you so. 2723: 818: 779: 561: 4329: 4086: 4078: 3871: 2893: 2661: 2593: 2221:. Our requirements for the usage of non-free media are high, in the case of Wynnewood, they have not been met. 1420: 589:
are not on the image description page, rather it comes from sourced discussion in the article about the image.
251: 4105:
policy which aren't satisfied either (thereby meaning that it is unwise to readd the image to the article). --
801:
I don't envy you the task you've taken on. Try to have fun with it, or else the boobs will drive you batty.
264:
and other similar templates that are used on files that fall under this restriction have a note added to them
4037:. In this case there are no rationales for the additional uses of the file. Without meeting all 10 points of 3771:
everybody can have a bad day every once in a while. If you'd rather not take this advice - then please read
2608:
violations, otherwise the users are far more likely to just remove the comments and repeat the #9 violation.
221: 183: 134: 4097:. In some cases, it might be a simple case of just adding a fair use rationale (and then readding the image 2879: 1866: 1833: 566: 1861:
in the future. Also, if you are not satisfied with the timing, write the rationale yourself. Best regards,
4385: 3362:. Shouldn't those images also go to a deletion discussion instead of being handled through an edit war? -- 2964: 2743: 2682: 2657: 2640: 2589: 2075:
Hi. For "Source" you should give your source for the image, such as URL or "scan of personal copy", etc.
1513: 1300: 1271: 1231: 1069: 905: 830: 492: 315: 298: 1611:
for talking politely and explaining all the related issues. this is the right way. it should not be like
3596:
They may have a valid rationale, but it is not of the article where I removed the file. I can also cite
2310: 2256: 2200: 2121: 2045: 1747: 1708: 1643: 1591: 1163: 952: 665: 496: 453: 302: 217: 179: 130: 3732:. Let me be specific, since my the nicely worded template didnt get the point across, These files fail 2306: 2252: 2196: 2117: 3876: 3833: 3807: 3782: 3713: 3623: 3583: 2248: 1684: 1455: 806: 767: 2452: 2370: 1699:
Bicol Region, so the use on this article is covered by that line on Fair Use Rationale. Please read
1332: 1038: 999: 411: 402:
Please stop vandalizing pages. I have recently ask to have the article in question to be looked at,
366: 4341: 3436:
You could make that same argument about a photo of a 2D painting. I have very, very old prints of
3359: 3150: 2713:
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
2456: 1957: 1558: 1398: 1042: 1003: 4041:
and having a rationale for each use I will remove the file. If you continue to revert and violate
4405: 3492: 2875: 1862: 1829: 1577: 1387:
some content from my sandbox and just to get a better understanding, I was wondering why? I read
443: 3696:
You should always inform the uploader on a matter like this - it is just a matter of politeness.
787:
No big deal, happens fairly often. Just glad your response was a lot nicer than the ones above.
577:
Also, if you are enforcing this policy fairly, you should remove most of the images used in the
1508:. You may also use example.jpg to figure out sizing and formatting if need be. Happy editing! 1479:
Actually I dont need to provide you with anything, your usage of the logo is unacceptable, see
682:
and similarly licensed images hosted here on wikipedia can be used in any way that you choose.
678:
There is one key difference you should be aware of, free media and non-free media. Images from
4420: 4381: 4352: 4292: 4257: 4209: 4182: 4164: 4110: 4064: 4050: 3996: 3926: 3905: 3851: 3823: 3757: 3674: 3654: 3608: 3552: 3503: 3367: 3248: 3161: 3140: 3079: 3029: 3015: 2999: 2960: 2939: 2919: 2678: 2636: 2613: 2550: 2519: 2406: 2336: 2328: 2324: 2291: 2226: 2211: 2180: 2162: 2144: 2109: 2098: 2060: 2025: 1976: 1931: 1892: 1848: 1777: 1731: 1719: 1604: 1566: 1527: 1509: 1487: 1436: 1368: 1296: 1286: 1267: 1246: 1227: 1214: 1087: 1065: 1023: 972: 923: 901: 865: 844: 826: 792: 741: 698: 679: 612: 594: 517: 484: 432: 383: 335: 290: 204: 195: 165: 111: 95: 76: 47: 17: 3665:. The files in question do not have valid rationales for the list article, I could also cite 3749: 3687: 3666: 3597: 3569: 3537: 3529: 3477: 3427: 3397: 3382: 3311: 3286: 3265: 3230: 3175: 3122: 3054: 3048: 2808: 2428: 2380: 2278:
Yes those images do enhance the article, but they do not meet the requirements set forth by
2215: 2041: 2010: 1857:
Hello. So that strange upload warning was about this image? I see now. Consider sticking to
1798: 1743: 1704: 1664: 1657: 1640: 1620: 1608: 1588: 1547: 1505: 1463: 1428: 1342: 948: 661: 449: 420: 2361:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Museum_of_the_American_Revolution&oldid=549171280
1323:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Museum_of_the_American_Revolution&oldid=549171280
1266:
you need clarification of what I just said because I'm not even entirely sure what I said.
825:
I hope you don't think my above comment was mean or rude. Anyways, keep up the good work!
4030: 3777: 3708: 3618: 3578: 3094:
Hi Werieth. Could you please link to the particular RfC's that you are citing in closing
3072: 1916: 1809: 1680: 1079: 968: 642:. If you have a problem, not problem but you seriously need to rethink the rules. This is 638:
according to Knowledge rules. I am strictly stripping the rule to its bare essentials and
145: 2532:
with the OTRS permissions. I have also updated the image on the AFC you linked to above!
2131:
There isn't justification for the usage of 7 non-free files. Especially when it violates
4101:
writing a fair use rationale), whereas in other cases there might be other parts of the
3239:
Just because you disagree with the results does not mean you can ignore the results and
2214:
files that have been given "for wikipedia only" should actually be deleted on sight per
4337: 4333: 4245: 4201: 4102: 4094: 4090: 4081:. This looks perfectly correct: the file only has a fair use rationale for the article 4042: 4038: 4034: 4026: 3919: 3897: 3772: 3745: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3658: 3601: 3240: 3154: 2991: 2983: 2975: 2697: 2605: 2398: 2301: 2279: 2272: 2240: 2219: 2154: 2002: 1998: 1968: 1953: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1858: 1768: 1763: 1759: 1723: 1424: 1393: 1388: 1360: 1015: 858: 683: 586: 545: 541: 532: 424: 375: 328: 268: 153: 105: 87: 1804:
Sorry for the misunderstandings on my side. Have a drink, and let's settle the issue.
890: 104:
PS see email from Jimmy stating that wikipedia only permission files will be deleted.
4401: 4249: 4020: 4006: 3988: 2931: 2534: 2391: 2132: 2083: 1700: 1480: 1416: 1353: 1061: 995: 983: 854: 691: 324: 312:
I didnt think it was necessary to modify those those templates, they already include
4416: 4288: 4266:
What is wrong is sloppy editing, of which I am guilty. I have adjusted the text. --
4253: 4205: 4178: 4160: 4106: 4060: 4046: 4005:
Blindly? Hardly. You have been engaged in contentious editng for a while now. now,
3992: 3922: 3847: 3819: 3753: 3670: 3604: 3572:
for all of them) if you're intending to delete or just remove the pix he uploaded.
3548: 3499: 3441: 3363: 3244: 3157: 3136: 3075: 3025: 3011: 2995: 2935: 2915: 2903:
on every image. That means that the images are in fact still under copyright. See
2733: 2609: 2564: 2546: 2515: 2500: 2487: 2402: 2332: 2287: 2222: 2176: 2158: 2140: 2094: 2056: 2021: 1972: 1927: 1888: 1844: 1773: 1727: 1612: 1562: 1523: 1483: 1432: 1364: 1282: 1242: 1210: 1083: 1019: 919: 861: 840: 788: 737: 720: 694: 651: 608: 590: 578: 513: 428: 379: 331: 200: 161: 107: 91: 72: 2529: 938: 766:. The other flags are on Commons, so I assumed that flag was, too. Good one! – 3533: 3473: 3472:, for exactly the reasons you suggest re your pics of "Blue Boy" and "Pinkie". 3450: 3423: 3412: 3393: 3378: 3349: 3330: 3307: 3282: 3261: 3226: 3196: 3171: 3118: 3103: 2861:
Thanks for any advice and assistance you can provide. John Seed (mydogsarelazy)
2787: 2424: 2376: 2040:
Thanks for noting the missing rationale, a matter which has now been addressed.
2006: 1660: 1616: 1543: 1542:
will be not be a good place to stay. my use of that logo is not harming anybody.
1459: 1338: 604: 549: 536: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
267:"This image is only allowed to be used in the main namespace on articles. FMI: 4424: 4409: 4389: 4345: 4315: 4312: 4296: 4270: 4267: 4261: 4238: 4235: 4213: 4195: 4192: 4186: 4168: 4138: 4135: 4114: 4054: 4013: 4010: 4000: 3945: 3942: 3930: 3912: 3909: 3855: 3841: 3827: 3789: 3761: 3720: 3678: 3630: 3612: 3590: 3556: 3541: 3507: 3481: 3454: 3431: 3416: 3401: 3386: 3371: 3353: 3334: 3315: 3290: 3269: 3252: 3243:, this is just a re-hash of the List of X characters and discography debates. 3234: 3200: 3179: 3165: 3144: 3126: 3107: 3083: 3065: 3033: 3019: 3003: 2968: 2943: 2923: 2883: 2775: 2686: 2666: 2644: 2617: 2598: 2568: 2554: 2540: 2523: 2504: 2491: 2476:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Family_of_Secrets
2460: 2432: 2410: 2384: 2340: 2314: 2295: 2264: 2230: 2204: 2184: 2166: 2148: 2125: 2102: 2087: 2064: 2049: 2029: 2014: 1980: 1961: 1935: 1920: 1912: 1896: 1870: 1852: 1837: 1813: 1805: 1788: 1781: 1751: 1735: 1712: 1688: 1668: 1649: 1624: 1597: 1570: 1551: 1531: 1517: 1491: 1471: 1440: 1409: 1372: 1346: 1304: 1290: 1275: 1250: 1235: 1218: 1091: 1073: 1046: 1027: 1007: 980: 956: 927: 909: 869: 848: 834: 820: 796: 781: 745: 723: 702: 673: 654: 616: 598: 521: 501: 461: 436: 414: 387: 369: 362: 339: 307: 225: 208: 187: 169: 138: 115: 99: 80: 4045:
I might need to request that you be topic banned from adding non-free files.
1427:
isn't negotiable. If you need to use a file for layout purposes you can use
3941:. You are continuing the edit wat you started on Scouting in California. -- 3323:
Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content/Archive_58#RFC:_Images_in_currency_articles
2901:© Sam Francis Foundation, California/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York 2839:
I am relatively inexperienced Knowledge user so please be patient with me.
1583:
and your user page unfortunately just doesn't meet the criteria. (It's not
4307:
I will no longer be commenting here as Stefan has opened a new discussion
4200:
If its filled out correctly and the rationale given in the template meets
4415:
Uh, can I get some more context? Im not sure what you are talking about.
3651:
National Register of Historic Places listings in Downtown Davenport, Iowa
2079: 687: 157: 2283: 2988:
File:Mavis Villiers (actress), promotional photograph - APR 14 1966.jpg
2560: 2496: 2483: 2172: 2153:
I take back what I said, given the rationales on the files, the bar of
998:
page, and some were on wikimedia commons, so why did you remove them?!
2913:
Knowledge:Requesting_copyright_permission#When_permission_is_confirmed
2210:
Unless a file is released under a free license, it must be treated as
802: 4093:. I see that the user has removed files from lots of articles citing 3818:
Until there is a valid rationale the file cannot be on that article.
3547:
Someone else has already reverted you. See my post on the talk page.
3446: 3408: 3345: 3326: 3192: 3099: 1503:
Arja, if you read above, you may <!-- comment out the file --: -->
535:
to comply to those standards for each of the four images used in the
531:
Hi Werieth, I spent a lot of time filling out every single point of
3051:). Let me know what else missing I will update accordingly, thanks 640:
anything other than the article name is not allowed to have pictures
3133:
Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Banknotes of the Sri Lankan rupee
3096:
Knowledge:Non-free_content_review#Banknotes_of_the_Sri_Lankan_rupee
314:
Any other usage of this image, on Knowledge or elsewhere, might be
2511: 1257: 3149:
No see my updated closing comments, there have been two RfC's at
2479:
invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).: -->
2239:
I find your reasoning fanatical. You are saying that "the bar of
732:
is in the public domain and is not subject to copyright. However
4153:
File:Council of Scout Associations in Bosnia and Herzegovina.svg
1718:
Just because you wrote a FUR does not make the usage valid, see
1423:. This includes user sandboxes, there is not a grace period, as 175: 3342:
Knowledge:Files for deletion/2013 April 21#Sri Lankan banknotes
2448:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/The History of The Beatles
1226:
or are the links required to be removed form the page, period?
1762:, in this case there are several factors that come into play, 1726:, usage in that manner is not acceptable, and was re-removed. 25: 4275:
It still needs some work, and doesn't look like a valid use.
3563:
Files you removed at List of NRHP sites in Downtown Davenport
4376:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
4358: 2956:
Talk:Thomas Savage (died 1611)#Move and add to Thomas Savage
2703: 937: 2604:
I have found removal actually works best for most cases of
2276:
and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding
4031:
missing a rationale for the article where it is being used
4025:. I was removing the files because the files clearly fail 2889:
Actually the files are not under a free license. You used
2710:
Hello, Werieth. Please check your email; you've got mail!
2395:
File:Museum of the American Revolution Day Rendering 1.jpg
1357:
File:Museum of the American Revolution Day Rendering 1.jpg
3131:
Do you mean the requests for comment that I mentioned in
2321:
File:American Home Realty Wynnewood Brochure (1953) 3.JPG
557:
File:Damian Loeb Atmosphere 2010 36x36in Oil on Linen.jpg
2218:, the founder of wikipedia, see related email from 2005 607:
and removed those files that do not comply with policy.
406:
will demonstrate the gist of the game play of the game.
4308: 2827: 2796: 2715: 2673: 2624: 2360: 2319:
You need to review policy. Lets take one random image.
1993: 1384: 1322: 1206: 763: 3358:
There appears to be a similar edit war in the article
3344:. Please see that discussion if you wish to opine. -- 3153:
which stated that these uses are a clear violation of
2583:
I've just partially reverted an edit that you made to
2137:
The inclusion of a limited number might be acceptable
2005:, but I restored it in link form per the same rule. — 1679:
either text or free images. Once again, thank you!!!
4332:. It follows that the logo is also not affected by 2909:
Knowledge:Requesting_copyright_permission#For_images
918:
Actually I dont, Ive already cleaned the mess up :)
896:
Take 5 and enjoy some coffee as I'm sure you have a
686:
however is copyrighted and its use is restricted by
4204:then yes. Right now the rationale isnt sufficient. 3661:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 3340:For all interested parties, I have listed these at 1241:Linking is fine, however they cannot be displayed. 1099:I removed (did not delete from wikipedia) 5 files: 194:So far in this discussion you have used the phrase 4372:Message added 17:10, 27 April 2013 (UTC). You can 4287:then it shouldnt be used on another group's page. 1295:Fair enough. Figured I would ask. Happy editing! 152:in your userbox, it is a blatant violation of our 4018:Can you please add some context to the statement 3669:as another reason for removal. Do not re-insert. 3575:Thanks in advance for your more careful efforts, 3024:I see, OK. I've fixed this one manually, then. -- 1060:Josh, Werieth deleted HUNDREDS of pictures using 3976:Which does not have a rationale and was removed. 2157:has not been met. Those files are unacceptable. 977:Knowledge:Non-free content review#State articles 3896:did not appear to be constructive and has been 625:Simple Question Regarding the Non-Free Pictures 3686:I didn't upload these photos. As I mentioned 150:File:Seal of Raleigh County, West Virginia.png 2474:Hi. I see that you removed the image from of 8: 4083:Bucks County Council (Boy Scouts of America) 3703:otherwise you risk coming across as a bully. 2950:Request for uninvolved 3rd party to comment. 2932:WP:MCQ#Permission to use Sam Francis images 2401:. If you still have questions let me know. 2001:. You removed a non-free inlined image per 1363:. If you still have questions let me know. 728:Not all pictures are subject to copyright, 4365:Hello, Werieth. You have new messages at 3528:I have undone your removal of images from 4175:why must this article include this image? 3937:They all have the rationale, for example 3866:Removing files that lacked a rationale II 3321:Wireth, thank you for adding the links. 2954:Hello. I am requesting your opinions at 2905:Knowledge:Requesting copyright permission 2495:I now have the image on my disk as well. 2139:, but there isn't a justification for 7. 1772:understanding of the article as a whole. 548:in the following four images used in the 4143:The issue here is you are claiming that 2982:It seems that you may have missed some 1991:Just to let you know, I somewhat undid 1823:File:MacOSX Leopard Dock Overloaded.png 730:File:Puerto Pirámides y Golfo Nuevo.jpg 69:Knowledge:WikiProject Gaelic games/club 3892:Welcome to Knowledge. At least one of 3801:Removing files that lacked a rationale 2271:You are forgetting the second part of 1607:for ur advice and suggestion. thank u 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2959:and respect your wishes. Thank you. 1615:who just deleted image from user page 1124:File:The Quarrymen St Peters fete.jpg 1104:File:Quarrymen In Rosebery Street.jpg 527:Use of images in Damian Loeb Article? 7: 2714: 1263:WP:WikiProject Articles for Creation 3773:WP:Don't be intentionally obnoxious 2986:violations when fixing them. Check 2071:Cover image, the Dish and the Spoon 359:User:Sundogs/Gameplay of The Sims 3 280: 4285:Savez izviđača Bosne i Hercegovine 4149:Savez izviđača Bosne i Hercegovine 3972:Savez izviđača Bosne i Hercegovine 3950:But not for where I removed them. 3882:Savez izviđača Bosne i Hercegovine 3600:as grounds for removal along with 3184:He edited the close to add them - 1379:Removal of content from my sandbox 404:WITH IMAGES APPLIED TO THE ARTICLE 24: 4075:File:Bucks County Council CSP.png 2629: 3887: 3643: 3225:person to have missed entirely. 2865: 2851: 2630: 2359:Can you help me with this edit? 2282:. Keep in mind that Knowledge's 1797: 1630:You're welcome, Arja, and thank 1321:Can you help me with this edit? 889: 281: 29: 4367:Knowledge talk:Non-free content 4145:File:Savez Izviđača Srbije.png 4121:File:Savez Izviđača Srbije.png 3954:File:Savez Izviđača Srbije.png 3939:File:Savez Izviđača Srbije.png 3663:Media copyright questions page 1419:cannot be used outside of the 1144:File:Percy Phillips record.jpg 967:I'm leaving this not for you, 636:all pictures should be removed 427:enforcement is not vandalism. 1: 1184:File:Sutcliffe in Hamburg.jpg 378:they cannot be on that page. 176:WIKI policy on dont be a dick 4234:I expanded the rationale. -- 4173:The best thing to do is ask 4085:, so the use of the file in 2719:at any time by removing the 2244:of users of the Knowledge. 1967:Those uses would never pass 1942:File:RAF Fighter Command.jpg 648:stating an obvious statement 572:File:Dl ibelieveyoutommy.jpg 3958:Is being used on two pages 734:File:Homer Simpson 2006.png 562:File:Dl thecolorofmoney.jpg 248:File:Homer_Simpson_2006.png 4442: 4425:02:16, 30 April 2013 (UTC) 4410:02:00, 30 April 2013 (UTC) 4390:17:10, 27 April 2013 (UTC) 4346:15:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC) 4323:File:YarraTramsLogoNew.svg 4316:17:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC) 4297:13:28, 25 April 2013 (UTC) 4271:22:34, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 4262:21:30, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 4239:21:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 4214:20:58, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 4196:20:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 4187:20:40, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 4169:20:38, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 4139:20:30, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 4115:20:19, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 4055:19:48, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 4014:19:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 4001:19:25, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3946:19:11, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3931:19:07, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3913:19:06, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3856:19:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3842:18:52, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3828:18:49, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3790:19:15, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3762:18:56, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3721:18:54, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3679:18:40, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3631:18:54, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3613:18:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3591:18:25, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3557:18:17, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3542:18:11, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 3508:17:29, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3482:09:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 3455:20:06, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3432:17:25, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3417:17:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3402:17:04, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3387:17:01, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3372:16:49, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3354:16:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3335:16:11, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3316:16:09, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3291:16:08, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3270:16:06, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3253:16:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3235:16:02, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3201:15:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3180:15:56, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3166:15:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3145:15:54, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3127:15:51, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3108:15:24, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3090:Sri Lankan banknotes close 3084:10:32, 20 April 2013 (UTC) 3066:07:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC) 3034:20:37, 19 April 2013 (UTC) 3020:20:34, 19 April 2013 (UTC) 3004:20:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC) 2969:19:43, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 2944:20:24, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 2924:19:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 2884:19:27, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 2776:09:21, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 2687:19:34, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2667:19:18, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2645:18:49, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2618:18:30, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2599:18:21, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2569:18:21, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2555:18:18, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2541:18:16, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2524:17:51, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2505:16:55, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2492:16:32, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2461:03:16, 14 April 2013 (UTC) 2433:02:34, 13 April 2013 (UTC) 2341:19:37, 13 April 2013 (UTC) 2315:01:22, 13 April 2013 (UTC) 2296:00:59, 13 April 2013 (UTC) 2265:00:55, 13 April 2013 (UTC) 2231:00:45, 13 April 2013 (UTC) 2205:00:40, 13 April 2013 (UTC) 2185:15:25, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 2167:15:15, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 2149:15:08, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 2126:15:04, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 2103:19:28, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 2088:19:23, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 2065:14:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 2050:14:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 2030:22:51, 11 April 2013 (UTC) 2015:22:50, 11 April 2013 (UTC) 1981:16:57, 11 April 2013 (UTC) 1962:16:56, 11 April 2013 (UTC) 1936:15:25, 11 April 2013 (UTC) 1921:15:24, 11 April 2013 (UTC) 1897:13:37, 11 April 2013 (UTC) 1871:13:34, 11 April 2013 (UTC) 1853:13:24, 11 April 2013 (UTC) 1838:13:21, 11 April 2013 (UTC) 1814:22:50, 10 April 2013 (UTC) 1078:Please note that I not an 497:View signature as intended 320:Knowledge:Non-free content 303:View signature as intended 67:You removed the logo from 4281:identify the organization 4155:is the actual logo, thus 2866: 2852: 2411:19:24, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 2385:18:50, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 1782:16:20, 9 April 2013 (UTC) 1752:16:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC) 1736:15:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC) 1713:15:39, 9 April 2013 (UTC) 1689:21:16, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1669:17:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1650:17:47, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1625:17:42, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1598:17:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1571:17:34, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1552:17:34, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1532:17:27, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1518:17:25, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1492:17:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1472:17:16, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1441:17:03, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1410:16:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1373:19:24, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 1347:18:50, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 1305:16:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 1291:16:16, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 1276:16:07, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 1251:15:46, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 1236:15:43, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 1219:15:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 1092:15:32, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 1074:15:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 1047:15:13, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 1028:22:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 1008:22:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 984:04:50, 5 April 2013 (UTC) 957:21:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 928:18:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 910:18:39, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 870:18:40, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 849:18:37, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 835:18:35, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 821:18:18, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 797:17:55, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 782:17:52, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 746:20:02, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 724:19:33, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 703:19:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 690:, copyright law, and our 674:19:22, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 655:19:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 617:15:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 599:15:51, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 522:12:09, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 502:07:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 462:04:06, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 437:04:06, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 415:04:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 388:03:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 370:03:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 340:02:44, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 308:22:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC) 226:12:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 209:02:55, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 188:22:13, 2 April 2013 (UTC) 170:21:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC) 139:21:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC) 116:20:06, 2 April 2013 (UTC) 100:19:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC) 81:19:49, 2 April 2013 (UTC) 60:Gaelic football club logo 4330:Threshold of originality 4128:Non-free image rationale 4087:Scouting in Pennsylvania 4079:Scouting in Pennsylvania 3872:Scouting in Pennsylvania 2369:Commented on this here: 1561:and is against the law. 1331:Commented on this here: 1205:The edit in question is 882:A cup of coffee for you! 148:, as for the removal of 4395:LGs of BC pics removed? 4023:sets the minimum as one 3908:for that. Thank you. -- 3659:Non-free image criteria 3392:real-world relevance). 2510:Ive asked someone from 2392:non-free content policy 1354:non-free content policy 762:Thank you for catching 736:is copyrighted by Fox. 154:non-free content policy 4363: 4021:Knowledge:NFC#Policy_2 4007:Knowledge:NFC#Policy_2 3690:a very good editor did 2994:violations, though. -- 2708: 1383:Hi Werieth. I see you 942: 567:File:Dl resolution.jpg 316:copyright infringement 4362: 3966:Which has a rationale 3962:Savez Izviđača Srbije 3655:non-free image policy 2707: 1164:File:Julia in hat.jpg 941: 900:of files left to go! 692:non-free media policy 603:PS, I took a look at 585:The requirements for 124:WTF are you doing???? 42:of past discussions. 3877:Scouting in New York 3617:copied from my talk: 3042:World_One_Mumbai.png 2849:samfrancisfoundation 2020:I saw, no big deal. 1193:Non-free fair use in 1173:Non-free fair use in 1153:Non-free album cover 1133:Non-free fair use in 1113:Non-free fair use in 989:Deletion of pictures 962: 475:Non-free promotional 259:Non-free promotional 4119:So, I went back to 3524:Crystal Maze images 3360:Coins of Madagascar 3113:For me too, please. 2781:Sam Francis Gallery 2286:is to create a 💕. 1559:copyright violation 1014:I only removed the 857:to clearly explain 4374:remove this notice 4364: 3832:I have added one. 3462:Bridgeman vs Corel 2716:remove this notice 2709: 2628:allot, don't you? 2390:Please review our 2171:PS take a look at 1352:Please review our 943: 354:Dear sir or ma'am, 4077:from the article 3894:your recent edits 3496: 2468:Family of Secrets 2329:Wynnewood, Dallas 2325:Wynnewood, Dallas 2268: 2251:comment added by 2110:Wynnewood, Dallas 1819: 1818: 1581: 1499:talk page stalker 1475: 1458:comment added by 1225:<!-- ] --: --> 1056:talk page stalker 934:A kitten for you! 915: 914: 815: 811: 776: 772: 485:User:Technical 13 447: 361:is a subpage for 291:User:Technical 13 252:WP:Teahouse/Hosts 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Werieth 4433: 4377: 4132: 4126: 3891: 3890: 3785: 3716: 3688:User:Farragutful 3647: 3646: 3626: 3586: 3570:User:Farragutful 3530:The Crystal Maze 3490: 3064: 3059: 2898: 2892: 2872: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2858: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2832: 2823: 2804: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2740: 2738: 2732: 2728: 2722: 2718: 2706: 2676: 2665: 2664: 2652:comment out only 2635: 2634: 2633: 2627: 2622:You seem to get 2597: 2596: 2559:Thank you both! 2537: 2267: 2245: 2216:User:Jimbo Wales 1996: 1971:Specifically #8 1801: 1794: 1793: 1575: 1506:File:Example.jpg 1502: 1474: 1452: 1429:File:example.jpg 1417:non-free content 1406: 1401: 1396: 1198:not from commons 1197: 1191: 1178:not from commons 1177: 1171: 1158:not from commons 1157: 1151: 1138:not from commons 1137: 1131: 1118:not from commons 1117: 1111: 1059: 893: 886: 885: 816: 813: 809: 777: 774: 770: 717:copyright issues 500: 479: 473: 441: 306: 286: 285: 284: 263: 257: 33: 32: 26: 4441: 4440: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4432: 4431: 4430: 4397: 4378: 4371: 4356: 4326: 4157:Purpose = logo 4147:is the logo of 4130: 4124: 3888: 3868: 3834:Judgesurreal777 3808:Judgesurreal777 3803: 3788: 3783: 3719: 3714: 3653:, may fail our 3644: 3641: 3629: 3624: 3589: 3584: 3565: 3526: 3170:Links please. 3092: 3055: 3052: 3044: 2980: 2952: 2896: 2894:Non-free 2D art 2890: 2864: 2862: 2850: 2848: 2813: 2790: 2786: 2783: 2769: 2768: 2763: 2762: 2753: 2752: 2745: 2744: 2741: 2736: 2730: 2726: 2724:You've got mail 2720: 2712: 2704: 2701: 2672: 2660: 2656: 2631: 2623: 2592: 2588: 2581: 2535: 2472: 2443: 2366:description. 2357: 2246: 2113: 2073: 2038: 1992: 1989: 1946:Good Afternoon 1944: 1909: 1826: 1792: 1696: 1676: 1496: 1453: 1449: 1404: 1399: 1394: 1381: 1328:description. 1319: 1195: 1189: 1175: 1169: 1155: 1149: 1135: 1129: 1115: 1109: 1053: 991: 965: 936: 884: 807: 768: 760: 634:I request that 627: 529: 482: 477: 471: 470:I've read over 323:which includes 288: 282: 261: 255: 126: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4439: 4437: 4429: 4428: 4396: 4393: 4370: 4357: 4355: 4351:Talkback from 4349: 4325: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4228: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4216: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3977: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3948: 3934: 3933: 3885: 3884: 3879: 3874: 3867: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3802: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3780: 3775: 3765: 3764: 3724: 3723: 3711: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3697: 3694: 3691: 3640: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3621: 3581: 3564: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3525: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3319: 3318: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3114: 3091: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3043: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 2979: 2972: 2951: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2927: 2926: 2834: 2833: 2782: 2779: 2764: 2746: 2711: 2702: 2700: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2671:The answer is 2647: 2580: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2557: 2494: 2482: 2471: 2465: 2442: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2421: 2414: 2413: 2356: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2234: 2233: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2112: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2072: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2037: 2034: 2033: 2032: 1999:Talk:dot the i 1988: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1943: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1908: 1907:RAF Castletown 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1825: 1820: 1817: 1816: 1802: 1791: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1739: 1738: 1695: 1692: 1675: 1672: 1653: 1652: 1601: 1600: 1573: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1448: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1415:Unfortunately 1380: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1318: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1222: 1221: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1031: 1030: 1016:non-free files 990: 987: 964: 963:Well, I'm back 961: 959: 935: 932: 931: 930: 913: 912: 894: 883: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 851: 759: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 708: 707: 706: 705: 684:Non-free media 632:ARE NAMESPACES 626: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 575: 574: 569: 564: 559: 528: 525: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 467: 466: 465: 464: 439: 419:Please review 408:NO EXCEPTIONS 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 357:The images on 355: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 239: 238: 237: 236: 235: 234: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 174:Please review 144:Please review 125: 122: 121: 120: 119: 118: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4438: 4426: 4422: 4418: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4407: 4403: 4394: 4392: 4391: 4387: 4383: 4375: 4368: 4361: 4354: 4350: 4348: 4347: 4343: 4339: 4335: 4331: 4324: 4321: 4317: 4314: 4310: 4306: 4298: 4294: 4290: 4286: 4282: 4279: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4269: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4259: 4255: 4251: 4247: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4237: 4233: 4215: 4211: 4207: 4203: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4194: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4184: 4180: 4176: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4166: 4162: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4137: 4129: 4122: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4112: 4108: 4104: 4100: 4096: 4092: 4088: 4084: 4080: 4076: 4072: 4069: 4066: 4062: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4052: 4048: 4044: 4040: 4036: 4032: 4028: 4024: 4022: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4012: 4008: 4004: 4003: 4002: 3998: 3994: 3990: 3986: 3975: 3974: 3973: 3970: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3960: 3959: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3952: 3951: 3949: 3947: 3944: 3940: 3936: 3935: 3932: 3928: 3924: 3921: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3911: 3907: 3903: 3899: 3895: 3883: 3880: 3878: 3875: 3873: 3870: 3869: 3865: 3857: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3839: 3835: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3825: 3821: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3813: 3809: 3800: 3797: 3791: 3786: 3779: 3776: 3774: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3726: 3725: 3722: 3717: 3710: 3707: 3702: 3698: 3695: 3692: 3689: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3664: 3660: 3656: 3652: 3638: 3632: 3627: 3620: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3610: 3606: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3587: 3580: 3576: 3573: 3571: 3562: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3523: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3494: 3493:edit conflict 3489: 3483: 3479: 3475: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3443: 3439: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3384: 3380: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3369: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3351: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3304: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3279: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3232: 3228: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3187: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3115: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3098:? Thanks. -- 3097: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3074: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3063: 3061: 3060: 3058: 3050: 3041: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2977: 2973: 2971: 2970: 2966: 2962: 2957: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2928: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2914: 2910: 2907:specifically 2906: 2902: 2895: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2876:Mydogsarelazy 2873: 2859: 2844: 2840: 2837: 2831: 2830: 2826: 2821: 2817: 2812: 2811: 2807: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2789: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2778: 2777: 2774: 2767: 2760: 2756: 2751: 2750: 2735: 2725: 2717: 2699: 2696: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2675: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2663: 2659: 2653: 2648: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2626: 2625:this question 2621: 2620: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2595: 2591: 2586: 2578: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2539: 2538: 2531: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2477: 2469: 2466: 2464: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2449: 2440: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2393: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2373: 2372: 2367: 2363: 2362: 2354: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2303: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2274: 2270: 2269: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2242: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2111: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2076: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2055:No big deal, 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2036:First Bristol 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1995: 1987:Undid an edit 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1906: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1863:Codename Lisa 1860: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1830:Codename Lisa 1824: 1821: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1800: 1796: 1795: 1790: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1770: 1765: 1761: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1693: 1691: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1673: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1659: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1642: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1599: 1596: 1593: 1590: 1586: 1579: 1578:edit conflict 1574: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1500: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1482: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1408: 1407: 1402: 1397: 1390: 1386: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1355: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1335: 1334: 1329: 1325: 1324: 1316: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1264: 1259: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1203: 1194: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1182: 1174: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1162: 1154: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1142: 1134: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1122: 1114: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1080:administrator 1077: 1076: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1057: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1037:a Free File! 1036: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 988: 986: 985: 982: 978: 974: 970: 960: 958: 954: 950: 946: 940: 933: 929: 925: 921: 917: 916: 911: 907: 903: 899: 895: 892: 888: 887: 881: 871: 867: 863: 860: 856: 852: 850: 846: 842: 838: 837: 836: 832: 828: 824: 823: 822: 819: 817: 804: 800: 799: 798: 794: 790: 786: 785: 784: 783: 780: 778: 765: 757: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 727: 726: 725: 722: 718: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 704: 700: 696: 693: 689: 685: 681: 677: 676: 675: 671: 667: 663: 659: 658: 657: 656: 653: 649: 646:a threat but 645: 641: 637: 633: 624: 618: 614: 610: 606: 602: 601: 600: 596: 592: 588: 584: 583: 582: 580: 573: 570: 568: 565: 563: 560: 558: 555: 554: 553: 551: 547: 543: 538: 534: 526: 524: 523: 519: 515: 503: 498: 494: 490: 486: 476: 469: 468: 463: 459: 455: 451: 445: 444:edit conflict 440: 438: 434: 430: 426: 422: 418: 417: 416: 413: 409: 405: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 372: 371: 368: 364: 360: 356: 353: 352: 351: 350: 341: 337: 333: 330: 326: 322: 321: 317: 311: 310: 309: 304: 300: 296: 292: 278: 273: 272: 270: 260: 253: 249: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 227: 223: 219: 218:Coal town guy 214: 213: 212: 211: 210: 206: 202: 197: 193: 192: 191: 190: 189: 185: 181: 180:Coal town guy 177: 173: 172: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 142: 141: 140: 136: 132: 131:Coal town guy 123: 117: 113: 109: 106: 103: 102: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 84: 83: 82: 78: 74: 70: 65: 64:Hi Werieth, 59: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4398: 4382:Technical 13 4379: 4353:Technical 13 4327: 4280: 4276: 4174: 4159:is invalid. 4156: 4098: 4067: 4019: 3902:welcome page 3886: 3804: 3799:Edit warring 3798: 3700: 3642: 3577: 3574: 3566: 3527: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3320: 3277: 3213: 3093: 3062: 3056: 3053: 3045: 2981: 2961:Technical 13 2953: 2900: 2874: 2860: 2845: 2841: 2838: 2836:Hi Werieth, 2835: 2828: 2824: 2810:Article talk 2809: 2805: 2765: 2754: 2748: 2747: 2742: 2679:Technical 13 2651: 2637:Technical 13 2582: 2533: 2514:to comment. 2473: 2467: 2451: 2444: 2374: 2368: 2364: 2358: 2275: 2247:— Preceding 2193: 2136: 2114: 2077: 2074: 2039: 1990: 1952: 1948: 1945: 1926:No problem. 1910: 1827: 1740: 1697: 1694:Bicol Region 1677: 1654: 1635: 1631: 1605:Technical 13 1602: 1584: 1540: 1510:Technical 13 1454:— Preceding 1450: 1392: 1382: 1336: 1330: 1326: 1320: 1297:Technical 13 1268:Technical 13 1228:Technical 13 1223: 1188:Tagged with 1168:Tagged with 1148:Tagged with 1128:Tagged with 1108:Tagged with 1098: 1066:Technical 13 1034: 1032: 992: 966: 947: 944: 902:Technical 13 897: 827:Technical 13 764:this boo-boo 761: 716: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 628: 579:Damien Hirst 576: 530: 510: 407: 403: 313: 276: 266: 265: 246:You removed 127: 66: 63: 55: 43: 37: 4248:. See also 4134:yourself?-- 4091:WP:NFCC#10c 4059:I see that 3906:the sandbox 3057:KuwarOnline 2797:visual edit 2788:Sam Francis 2470:cover image 2307:Wissembourg 2253:Wissembourg 2197:Wissembourg 2118:Wissembourg 2042:Jezhotwells 1744:Briarfallen 1705:Briarfallen 1658:Writ Keeper 1641:Writ Keeper 1609:Writ Keeper 1589:Writ Keeper 1585:necessarily 949:Arildnordby 662:Writ Keeper 605:Damian Loeb 550:Damian Loeb 537:Damian Loeb 450:Writ Keeper 36:This is an 4250:WP:NFC#UUI 4246:WP:NFCC#3a 4123:and added 4073:) removed 4027:WP:NFCC#10 3920:WP:NFCC#10 3778:Smallbones 3746:WP:NFCC#10 3709:Smallbones 3701:carefully, 3639:April 2013 3619:Smallbones 3579:Smallbones 3260:applied. 2978:violations 2585:my sandbox 2579:My Sandbox 2536:·Add§hore· 2463:JoshBlitz 2212:WP:NONFREE 1789:User:Nageh 1720:WP:NFTABLE 1681:BrandonsLe 1674:Thank You! 1049:JoshBlitz 1010:JoshBlitz 855:WP:NFC#UUI 758:Flag image 363:The Sims 3 4338:Bahnfrend 4089:violates 3784:smalltalk 3750:WP:NFLIST 3742:WP:NFCC#8 3738:WP:NFCC#3 3734:WP:NFCC#1 3715:smalltalk 3667:WP:NFLIST 3625:smalltalk 3602:WP:NFCC#3 3598:WP:NFLIST 3585:smalltalk 3466:Bridgeman 3241:WP:NFCC#3 3155:WP:NFCC#3 3049:WP:ICT/FU 2992:WP:NFCC#9 2984:WP:NFCC#9 2976:WP:NFCC#9 2930:See also 2871:gmail.com 2739:template. 2606:WP:NFCC#9 2453:JoshBlitz 2399:WP:NFCC#8 2355:Edit Help 2302:WP:NFCC#8 2284:m:Mission 2280:WP:NFCC#8 2273:WP:NFCC#8 2241:WP:NFCC#8 2155:WP:NFCC#8 2003:WP:NFCC#9 1994:your edit 1954:Gavbadger 1885:WP:NFCC#1 1881:WP:NFCC#3 1877:WP:NFCC#8 1769:WP:NFCC#8 1764:WP:NFCC#3 1724:WP:NFCC#8 1425:WP:NFCC#9 1421:mainspace 1361:WP:NFCC#8 1317:Edit Help 1039:JoshBlitz 1000:JoshBlitz 996:Quarrymen 859:WP:NFCC#9 587:WP:NFCC#8 552:article? 546:WP:NFCC#8 542:WP:NFCC#8 533:WP:NFCC#8 421:WP:VANDAL 376:WP:NFCC#9 269:WP:NFCC#9 88:WP:NFCC#9 4402:Skookum1 4071:contribs 3898:reverted 3442:Blue Boy 3276:So this 3073:WP:NFURG 2863:johnseed 2770:arbonaro 2658:drewmunn 2590:drewmunn 2545:Thanks. 2261:contribs 2249:unsigned 1603:thank u 1557:It is a 1468:contribs 1456:unsigned 1447:deletion 814:LLSWORTH 775:LLSWORTH 688:fair use 325:WP:NFC#9 250:from my 158:fair use 146:WP:CIVIL 4417:Werieth 4334:WP:NFCC 4289:Werieth 4254:Stefan2 4206:Werieth 4202:WP:NFCC 4179:Werieth 4161:Werieth 4107:Stefan2 4103:WP:NFCC 4095:WP:NFCC 4061:Werieth 4047:Werieth 4043:WP:NFCC 4039:WP:NFCC 4035:WP:NFCC 3993:Werieth 3923:Werieth 3848:Werieth 3846:Thanks 3820:Werieth 3754:Werieth 3730:WP:NFCC 3671:Werieth 3605:Werieth 3549:Werieth 3500:Stefan2 3364:Stefan2 3245:Werieth 3158:Werieth 3151:WT:NFCC 3137:Stefan2 3076:Werieth 3026:Stefan2 3012:Werieth 2996:Stefan2 2974:Missed 2936:Stefan2 2916:Werieth 2820:history 2801:history 2674:in here 2610:Werieth 2547:Werieth 2516:Werieth 2441:Article 2403:Werieth 2333:Werieth 2288:Werieth 2223:Werieth 2177:Werieth 2173:Chicago 2159:Werieth 2141:Werieth 2095:Werieth 2057:Werieth 2022:Werieth 1973:Werieth 1969:WP:NFCC 1928:Werieth 1889:Werieth 1859:WP:DTTR 1845:Werieth 1774:Werieth 1760:WP:NFCC 1728:Werieth 1613:Werieth 1563:Werieth 1524:Werieth 1484:Werieth 1433:Werieth 1385:removed 1365:Werieth 1283:Werieth 1243:Werieth 1211:Werieth 1084:Werieth 1020:Werieth 973:Stefan2 920:Werieth 862:Werieth 841:Werieth 789:Werieth 738:Werieth 721:Sundogs 695:Werieth 680:Commons 652:Sundogs 609:Werieth 591:Werieth 514:Stefan2 429:Werieth 425:WP:NFCC 412:Sundogs 380:Werieth 367:Sundogs 332:Werieth 329:WP:NFCC 201:Werieth 162:Werieth 108:Werieth 92:Werieth 73:Brocach 39:archive 3989:WP:NFC 3534:Cmch83 3474:Jheald 3438:Pinkie 3424:Jheald 3394:Jheald 3379:Jheald 3308:Jheald 3283:Jheald 3262:Jheald 3227:Jheald 3172:Jheald 3119:Jheald 2857:me.com 2755:aurice 2698:NFCC#9 2512:m:OTRS 2425:JC1008 2420:again! 2377:JC1008 2133:WP:NFG 2007:Frungi 1701:WP:FUR 1661:Arja36 1636:little 1617:Arja36 1544:Arja36 1481:WP:NFC 1460:Arja36 1339:JC1008 971:, and 318:. See 4400:not?? 4313:evrik 4268:evrik 4252:§6 -- 4236:evrik 4193:evrik 4136:evrik 4099:after 4011:evrik 3943:evrik 3910:evrik 3470:might 3278:isn't 2829:Watch 2480:: --> 1913:NtheP 1806:Nageh 1258:ReGex 981:evrik 969:Masem 803:Kudes 16:< 4421:talk 4406:talk 4386:talk 4342:talk 4311:. -- 4309:here 4293:talk 4258:talk 4210:talk 4183:talk 4165:talk 4151:but 4111:talk 4065:talk 4051:talk 3997:talk 3927:talk 3852:talk 3838:talk 3824:talk 3812:talk 3758:talk 3748:and 3675:talk 3609:talk 3553:talk 3538:talk 3504:talk 3478:talk 3451:talk 3440:and 3428:talk 3413:talk 3398:talk 3383:talk 3368:talk 3350:talk 3331:talk 3312:talk 3287:talk 3266:talk 3249:talk 3231:talk 3214:− 3197:talk 3191:. -- 3176:talk 3162:talk 3141:talk 3135:? -- 3123:talk 3104:talk 3080:talk 3071:See 3047:etc( 3030:talk 3016:talk 3000:talk 2965:talk 2940:talk 2934:. -- 2920:talk 2899:and 2880:talk 2816:edit 2793:edit 2683:talk 2662:talk 2641:talk 2614:talk 2594:talk 2565:talk 2551:talk 2530:here 2520:talk 2501:talk 2488:talk 2457:talk 2429:talk 2407:talk 2381:talk 2337:talk 2311:talk 2292:talk 2257:talk 2227:talk 2201:talk 2181:talk 2163:talk 2145:talk 2122:talk 2099:talk 2084:talk 2061:talk 2046:talk 2026:talk 2011:talk 1977:talk 1958:talk 1932:talk 1917:talk 1893:talk 1867:talk 1849:talk 1834:talk 1810:talk 1778:talk 1748:talk 1732:talk 1722:and 1709:talk 1685:talk 1665:talk 1656:own. 1621:talk 1567:talk 1548:talk 1528:talk 1514:talk 1488:talk 1464:talk 1437:talk 1389:this 1369:talk 1343:talk 1301:talk 1287:talk 1272:talk 1247:talk 1232:talk 1215:talk 1207:here 1088:talk 1070:talk 1043:talk 1024:talk 1004:talk 953:talk 924:talk 906:talk 866:talk 845:talk 831:talk 810:AINE 805:. – 793:talk 771:AINE 742:talk 699:talk 613:talk 595:talk 518:talk 433:talk 384:talk 374:See 336:talk 222:talk 205:talk 196:fuck 184:talk 166:talk 135:talk 112:talk 96:talk 77:talk 3814:)| 2734:ygm 2729:or 2080:P64 1997:of 1883:or 1632:you 1405:vee 1400:van 1395:Rob 1062:AWB 898:LOT 644:NOT 277:may 4423:) 4408:) 4388:) 4344:) 4295:) 4260:) 4212:) 4185:) 4167:) 4131:}} 4125:{{ 4113:) 4053:) 3999:) 3991:. 3929:) 3854:) 3840:) 3826:) 3760:) 3677:) 3611:) 3555:) 3540:) 3506:) 3480:) 3453:) 3430:) 3415:) 3400:) 3385:) 3370:) 3352:) 3333:) 3314:) 3289:) 3268:) 3251:) 3233:) 3199:) 3178:) 3164:) 3143:) 3125:) 3106:) 3082:) 3032:) 3018:) 3002:) 2967:) 2942:) 2922:) 2897:}} 2891:{{ 2882:) 2818:| 2799:| 2795:| 2737:}} 2731:{{ 2727:}} 2721:{{ 2685:) 2677:. 2643:) 2616:) 2567:) 2561:Bn 2553:) 2522:) 2503:) 2497:Bn 2490:) 2484:Bn 2459:) 2431:) 2423:-- 2409:) 2383:) 2339:) 2331:. 2313:) 2294:) 2263:) 2259:• 2229:) 2203:) 2183:) 2165:) 2147:) 2135:. 2124:) 2101:) 2086:) 2063:) 2048:) 2028:) 2013:) 1979:) 1960:) 1934:) 1919:) 1895:) 1887:. 1879:, 1869:) 1851:) 1836:) 1812:) 1780:) 1750:) 1734:) 1711:) 1703:. 1687:) 1667:) 1623:) 1569:) 1550:) 1530:) 1516:) 1490:) 1470:) 1466:• 1439:) 1431:. 1371:) 1345:) 1303:) 1289:) 1274:) 1249:) 1234:) 1217:) 1209:. 1196:}} 1190:{{ 1176:}} 1170:{{ 1156:}} 1150:{{ 1136:}} 1130:{{ 1116:}} 1110:{{ 1090:) 1072:) 1045:) 1035:is 1026:) 1006:) 955:) 926:) 908:) 868:) 847:) 833:) 795:) 744:) 719:. 701:) 672:) 668:+ 650:. 615:) 597:) 520:) 495:• 491:• 487:( 483:— 478:}} 472:{{ 460:) 456:+ 435:) 423:, 410:. 386:) 338:) 301:• 297:• 293:( 289:— 287:) 271:." 262:}} 256:{{ 224:) 207:) 186:) 168:) 137:) 114:) 98:) 90:. 79:) 4427:` 4419:( 4404:( 4384:( 4369:. 4340:( 4291:( 4256:( 4208:( 4181:( 4163:( 4109:( 4068:· 4063:( 4049:( 4029:( 3995:( 3925:( 3850:( 3836:( 3822:( 3810:( 3787:) 3781:( 3756:( 3744:, 3740:, 3736:, 3718:) 3712:( 3673:( 3628:) 3622:( 3607:( 3588:) 3582:( 3551:( 3536:( 3502:( 3495:) 3491:( 3476:( 3449:( 3447:B 3426:( 3411:( 3409:B 3396:( 3381:( 3366:( 3348:( 3346:B 3329:( 3327:B 3310:( 3285:( 3264:( 3247:( 3229:( 3195:( 3193:B 3189:2 3186:1 3174:( 3160:( 3139:( 3121:( 3102:( 3100:B 3078:( 3028:( 3014:( 2998:( 2963:( 2938:( 2918:( 2878:( 2825:· 2822:) 2814:( 2806:· 2803:) 2791:( 2766:C 2749:M 2681:( 2639:( 2612:( 2563:( 2549:( 2518:( 2499:( 2486:( 2455:( 2427:( 2405:( 2379:( 2335:( 2309:( 2290:( 2255:( 2225:( 2199:( 2179:( 2161:( 2143:( 2120:( 2097:( 2082:( 2059:( 2044:( 2024:( 2009:( 1975:( 1956:( 1930:( 1915:( 1891:( 1865:( 1847:( 1832:( 1808:( 1776:( 1746:( 1730:( 1707:( 1683:( 1663:( 1647:♔ 1644:⚇ 1619:( 1595:♔ 1592:⚇ 1580:) 1576:( 1565:( 1546:( 1526:( 1512:( 1501:) 1497:( 1486:( 1462:( 1435:( 1367:( 1341:( 1299:( 1285:( 1270:( 1245:( 1230:( 1213:( 1086:( 1068:( 1058:) 1054:( 1041:( 1022:( 1002:( 951:( 922:( 904:( 864:( 843:( 829:( 812:E 808:P 791:( 773:E 769:P 740:( 697:( 670:c 666:t 664:( 611:( 593:( 516:( 499:) 493:M 489:C 458:c 454:t 452:( 446:) 442:( 431:( 382:( 334:( 305:) 299:M 295:C 275:" 220:( 203:( 182:( 164:( 133:( 110:( 94:( 75:( 50:.

Index

User talk:Werieth
archive
current talk page
Knowledge:WikiProject Gaelic games/club
Brocach
talk
19:49, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
WP:NFCC#9
Werieth
talk
19:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Werieth
talk
20:06, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Coal town guy
talk
21:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
WP:CIVIL
File:Seal of Raleigh County, West Virginia.png
non-free content policy
fair use
Werieth
talk
21:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
WIKI policy on dont be a dick
Coal town guy
talk
22:13, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
fuck

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.