User talk:Werieth/201306

1678:. How presumptuous of me. Obviously you are considering the greater interest of the wiki by sweeping in and removing thumbnails being temporarily presented in the "Anonymous requests" display on the Photo workshop page. Presented there so that they may be noticed by Knowledge graphists and edited to better comply with the very guidelines that have been tossed around. I can't imagine the tragic consequences which might have ensued had you not so quickly stepped in to rescue us. Clearly it was a crisis of dire emergency and there was no time to consider other editors active on the page. So sorry to have questioned 206: 1158: 66: 31: 392: 244:, where you add spaces either side of every pipe and equals sign in a template. Is there any rule, guideline or consensus, or is it just your personal preference? If there is any rule or guideline, then the people responsible for the "cite" button should be told, as that button generates citations without spaces. I'm genuinely curious about this question - see 1708:, the requirement that non-free media only be used in articles. The Graphics Lab isn't an article and thus had the files removed from that location. I have removed them from user boxes, and countless other pages that are non-compliant over time. When using a non-free file on wikipedia, each usage must meet all 10 points of 1017:." In high-traffic topic areas, such NFL football player bios, such hidden text messages help reduce the problem of copyrighted photos and other images inserted by inexperienced users who are unfamiliar with Knowledge's copyright policy and strong preference for free-use images. Thanks for your understanding. 2294:

awhile back, and are all used because the alien races discussed are all so visually different and striking that the images are used to illustrate those "discussed in detail in the context of the article body, such as a discussion of the art style, or a contentious element of the work, simply provide

2029:

you chose to communicate this to the editors at the Photography workshop. I'd like to ask you to consider if there may have been a different approach that you could have taken which may have affected the tone of the response which you received. Other ways one may have informed/reminded fellow editors

2021:

At present, I've come to realize that although the text of the non-free guidelines allows for some exception to be made, it has become the customary practice to not actually do so. Strict "No non-free outside of main-space" is straightforward, cut-n-dry, and I can see where trying to keep it so might

1736:

Hi Werieth, I noticed you removed the logo from this article as it did not have a FUR. Am I right in assuming that this was because althoug there was a FUR for the National football association article, as a non-free logo, a FUR was needed for the national team article as well? If so I believe I have

1984:

mainspace only requirement, and you came back with a statement about how it should be considered on a case by case basis because it was a gallery. (Argument doesn't hold water). My impression about you is that you are relatively young, and have little experience dealing with the general public (lack

1979:

when you are unsure of the policy behind the action. You then proceeded to make a claim that wikipedia doesn't have policies and just guidelines, which I then had to show you was incorrect. You then choose to cherry pick wording from a section that had zero reason why the file was removed. I removed

1508:

Please, please, please, give some more consideration to context and to the editors working out of the Photography workshop. The file links which you deleted were being actively used to improve the state of the wiki. You didn't even bother to fill the hole you left upon removing them. Nor did you ask

1187:

for the following reasons: The cited policy (WP:NFG) is not strict, stating in fact that use of a gallery "should be considered on a case-by-case basis." This is one of those cases, I assert, where the use of a gallery is the perfect way to illustrate a time sequence of the subject's output. Without

1932:

which I could have responded to someone coming by and punching a coupla' holes in the Photo workshop display and then riding off into the sunset without expressing nary a word of concern for those affected. I thought I was actually being fairly restrained considering. User:Begoon provided a coupla'

2080:

Thanks for your stringent policing of Knowledge's fair use policies, Werieth. Your contributions are, I'm certain, exceptionally important in the bigger scheme of things. I only wish that I had as much free time as you so I could also become as exceedingly well versed in every minor guideline and

1931:

as along with the attached criticism it seems to have conveyed an edge beyond flippant fun. At this point I suspect that User:Werieth wouldn't have appreciated it in any context regardless. Oops, sorry about that, feet of clay. I still think it was a better option than any number of other ways in

974:

I misunderstood, that's all. Sorry about that. I wanted to start with a new leaf. You had mentioned that you wanted to get the Expatkiwi account unlocked, but that others were keeping the account locked. Also, you had responded to a request of mine to make the submissions legal. So, by using

1712:. Something that you seem to refuse to understand. Your response was extremely rude and insulting. I have done my best to try to help you, but its obvious at this point you are either unwilling or unable to understand the ramifications and complexity of copyright and the usage of non-free media. 1498:

This struck me as silly, so I applied an established template for expressing such. And followed it with details of why I had done so. Personally, I tend to appreciate it when someone points out that I've taken something too seriously (i.e. been 'silly'). For me, it goes with being a mere mortal.

1488:

Please consider the context of the Wikipepedia:Graphics lab/Photography workshop. What it is and what it does. I understand that you likely meant well and were probably seeing yourself as heroically defending the wiki against corruption and copyright lawyers, but please note that you did so in a

1638:

the guideline —preceding the "exemptions" subsection— which explicitly states that usage "should be considered on a case-by-case basis". I didn't see any community consideration and consensus being applied, what I saw was a lone editor drop in to make a sloppy (left holes) arbitrary unilateral

1188:

the gallery, anyone wanting to know about his work would need to search around quite a bit, whereas five gallery items tells the story quite well. Most casual readers, I suggest, could not find these images nearly as readily as an editor can: that's why it is useful to put them in the article.

2436:

of Morley's new Leisure Centre should be uploaded and how it is the only one of it's type. If you do not think that this is a viable reason for the image not to be uploaded, please explain as to why as the reason that I have given is very much a viable reason for it to be uploaded.

733:

also has images of packaging prominently displayed with no information in the text on the visual design of the product. Indeed one could compile quite a list of product related articles where this is the case. I am trying to eliminate the possibility of this being the result of a

302:(as well as, rather oddly changing a number of my references). The image is in fact not in copyright and is now on the Commons with the same name. I wonder, do you know a way in which I can bypass the fair use version and access the Commons version and get around this problem?-- 142:

For all of them, I would say that they illustrate the specific material in the article. Each image (including every ballplayer) corresponds exactly to the text, with no commercial infringement or negative usage of the images. The three images I believe are especially pertinent

975:

this account, I wanted to see about making the other submission summaries the same as your edit, thinking that what you had done would have cleared the legal hurdle and allow the flags to be displayed. It had nothing to do with trying to annoy you, or ignoring what you said.

944:

Yes, I'm one and the same person. While the primary account is still locked, using this one was the only option open to me. In any case, I thought that the issue stopping the pic from being utilized had been solved by you by the editing of the summary. What did I miss?

1985:

of customer service) so the way you responded was normal for you. However as you get older you will realize that you should temper your approach and that your current method rubs people the wrong way, and most people will interpret it as coming of really rude.

2654:

Hi Werieth. Hope this finds you well. Just a thought, but you might want to drop people a note or think about commenting images out rather than removing them from active sandboxes. I'd also appreciate it if you'd avoid running AWB in my sandbox. Thanks,

760:

is about a packaging company. Having their primary logo is all that is needed to meet the visual identification usage. If the individual sub brands are notable then they should have their own article where said file can be used. Lets further examine

341:

Many thanks. I assume that means I can now use the file again in personal space. Much appreciated. In the use of AWB, it may be difficult to turn off, but it is probably not appropriate in a user sandbox, where there is work in progress. Thanks

2123:

Why do you keep removing sports team logos from certain seasonal pages? Using a sports team logo for a page is completely allowed and done so in tens of thousands of team seasonal articles. You keep citing a guideline that doesn't even apply.

2674:

Hi there. I'm wondering if you could give me some advice on gaining a better understanding of when an image may be used fairly to add value to an article; when that image is subject to copyright. For example, there is a copyright image of

2022:

be useful to minimize debate, even if inconvenient and obstructive to Graphics lab editors. A de jure/de facto situation. While I may personally dislike being restrained by such, I can accept it. The rationale is not without foundation.

2161:

The guideline you cite is completely non-applicable and has to do with one time events having special logos that should be used instead of generic ones, however seasons are not one time events and special logos do not exist for them.

273:

There is no hard, fast rule. I do it for readability. The human mind automatically breaks text at a space. Trying to read a large block of complex text without them just gives me a headache if I do it enough. Similar to trying to read

2299:). That's why there isn't a copyright violation; the images received critical commentary and discussion of the work in question (generally in the production section) and are thus critical to understanding what the beings look like.-- 729:. I have no objections to adding information and references to the design in the article however I do want to discuss this seemly different interpretation of WP:NFCC#8 that we both have. I would also point out that the article on 180:

From what you are saying the images themselves are not important, they just illustrates something on the page that refers to the image. Also in each of those points you could just link to said other articles and not need the files.

1790:

Also, careful not to bite people as you did above — taking that kind of tone with a fellow editor is not good mojo, even if they're being completely reckless and making a total fool of themselves, which Kevjonesin was not.

1136:. The warning I placed on your talk page was not abuse, It was in fact a correctly placed warning template. If you disagree I will be glad to let an administrator re-explain why my actions follow policy and yours do not. 111:

You were right about the usage of Olympiacos emblem. It cannot be used in templates, only in articles. The information in "Purpose of use" section has been changed. You can remove the template. Thanking you in advance,

955:

Ive tried to help you, since you refuse to listen I wash my hands of this as I have done as much as I can to try to help you and you refuse to listen. I thought I had made some progress but I guess not. Ive filed a

1521:— An alternate approach: In hindsight, perhaps one could have questioned the files' usage —and made suggestions— on a relevant Photography workshop talk page rather than summarily and unilaterally deleting them. -- 2101: 493:. It seems arbitrary that some companies, most notably Western ones, such as Quaker Oats can illustrate their products whilst equally well known brands in their own countries, such as Jungle Oats, can not.-- 2017:

I went about things has influenced the response I've gotten from you. And likely helped set the tone for much of my own following comments as well. Regardless of the merits of points which have been raised.

844:

As for the free files on the example page, I have noticed that some of them are pictures of products. Does this mean, as I asked above, that I can resubmit these files under a free licence since I took the

2392:

Please dont take that the wrong way. It just means the argument that you are making is full of holes. If you want when I get a few spare minutes I can list these out in detail and full explanations. Citing

1974:

That is where our opinions differ, just about anything more severe and I would have taken you to ANI for CIVIL issues. I often have users who do not understand policy coming to my talk page with questions.

2335:

My bad, I thought the over 3 reverts was the line, not 2. I'm not trying to peeve you off here, I'm just saying that I have a reasonable defense for keeping the images. Can't we just discuss this?--

1639:

deletion leaving it for others to clean up his mess. In the future, please consult with the editors active on the Photography workshop page before making local 'policy' decisions on our behalf. --

1859:

Based on the sarcasm, trouting, etc that you yourself used Kev, I doubt that comment was at all about you - when one starts out on the offensive, one will get bitten, and one should expect such (

1489:

unilateral non-consensus manner without expressing any recognition of the fact that the images were being used to facilitate their being edited to better meet (main space) article guidelines.

1040:, correct the build, do not delete content, global article not restricted to hollywood alone, if image is an issue, delete it, do not delete the content, already reverted by two other users. 1013:

Greetings, Werieth. I respectfully ask that you not delete hidden text such as the infobox image field placeholder "Only free-content images are allowed for depicting living people -- see

552:

That is what I thought your concern was and I am not so sure of how important the issue of whether or not it should be treated is or if it does in fact means that it qualifies as a fail of

2253:

I don't understand why this image was CSD'd. It is distributed under the Creative Commons license as well, which pretty much invalidates the F3 requirement. I have denied your request --

1390: 2148: 2010:

I can accept most of that. Sorry for starting off with a snarky spin, Werieth. It's clearly not been very productive and seems to have set both of us off on poor emotional footing.

662:

I am a bit confused, there seems to be source cometary about both parts. Perhaps I was not clear when I wrote it. I have now made some adjustments to clarify on the photograph.--

470:

Hello, a quick question regarding images of products. I just want to get your thoughts on photographs of products with regards to whether or not they should be uploaded under

2153: 1737:

corrected this. If you can confirm that would be good as I think there might be other teams that don't have the required FURs and I would like to correct them too. Thanks.

474:? This issue seems to be an ambiguous one with some people, such as my self, uploading it under WP:NFC licence and others uploading them under a creative commons licence. 370:

Hi! I was just wondering why my page was altered without my knowledge/consent? I understand there was some issue with the format, but what are the specifics here? Thanks.

676:

For me the file is floating under the infobox next to the sections labeled "Adcock Ingram Critical Care" and "Brands" at that point its not being referenced by the text.

1509:

anyone for help or advice in doing so. How do you think that comes across to those with time and energy invested in actively working to improve images at the workshop?

508:

Lets break this down by image. You cited as a example page. It contains exactly two non-free files. The main logo and a single product example. Tiger Brands has 7.

1635: 1374: 138:

photos. Here is it, below. What do you think of allowing 3 of the 7 images you removed? (the 3 are discussed below, in my talk entry of 5/31/13). Thank you.

1232:

Why are you deleting the pictures from the article Limerick FC? The Non-free media information and use rationale for Limerick FC is explained for each file.

1305:

Sorry, I didn't know about it, my purpose was just to improve the pages of beach soccer. I won't do that again, have a nice day. 15:59, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

489:

by significantly increasing readers' understanding of the company and its staple of brands by illustrating those brands in the same way other pages such as

2127:

Virtually every single collegiate sports teams that have season by season pages have the unversity's athletic team logo used for that season on the page.

773:. When using a non-free file you should ask yourself why must I include this file? and Can the reader understand the article without this file? Right now 158:

File:Criollos de Caguas logo.png -- because it illustrates one of the major teams, and there is no commercial infringement or negative usage of the image.

1207:

as there is little third party sources that back your claims. There needs to be sourced critical commentary that supports those files in order to pass

1171: 83: 708:

There are zero sources about any visual design, and nothing about the changes in the 2010 version. That just isnt enough to meet the requirements of

1421:

Werieth, please gives us a bit more consideration in the future. Try to be more careful —full-of-care— as it gets difficult to work on images when

2138: 386: 382: 778: 654: 478: 323:

I have adjusted the licensing issues so it wont be an issue again. AWB, the tool I used for removing the file cleaned up the references. It uses

152:

File:LBPRC.png -- because an entire section is devoted to it. The article is about baseball in Puerto Rico, and this is the logo of their league.

2577: 2576:(Contextual significance) is the very reason why these images are necessary to understanding the subject matter. I have opened a discussion at 2189: 2133: 2734:

states that the image should only be used where required. This means that a photo of Robert Askin can only be used on the article about him.

871:(there was no human input in the visual design of the food, it is just the result of mixing ingredients together with a non-uniform result). 864: 1936:

which show that past editors responding to such have been much more colorful. Many other responses might well have started with the letters

1921:

or re-parse via the time stamps. As to bite-breeds-bite, and such, yes, I realize now that this was likely not the best time to have used a

2704: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2169: 245: 1541: 1479:

Knowledge doesn't have "policy" it has "guidelines" which are meant to be considered in context. It's part of the 5 pillars as I recall.

1291: 2622: 2590: 2531: 2497: 2206:#14 is about specifically this. Each season article cannot use the copyrighted logo, it is reserved to the article about the entity. 1383:"Exemptions from non-free content policy are made for the use of non-free content on certain administrative, non-article space pages 2193: 2626: 2594: 2535: 1316:

I don't know whether or not the image used for the page is unable to be used, but I used the same image that is presented on the

2572:

I am trying hard to bite my tongue, but this is about the most %^&*%^&*%$ reasoning I have seen on WP. Please re-read

440:

It's been changed. I decided to go with something a little different. Thank you, though. Let me know if there's anything else.

2680: 2456: 2143: 2066: 1868: 2491: 1389:, specifically for those that are used to manage questionable non-free content. Those pages that are exempt are listed in 406: 2081:

regulation for the project. Unfortunately, as I spend the majority of my time on other pursuits, I do not. Thanks again.

1320:

page. I assumed that any image already appearing on Knowledge has been cleared to be used. If I was wrong I apologize. ;

725:

I am not so sure of that interpretation of and feel that it is an overly strict and possibly pedantic interpretation of

2433: 1854: 1829: 485:

but will for the mean time not re-add the others. Additionally I maintain that all images that you removed adhere to

447: 379: 523: 2684: 2268: 1612: 1183:

I don't usually argue when my edits are (rarely) reverted. But I must protest this time. I restored the gallery to

860: 38: 2247: 2225: 1813:

Sorry about that, human error. Ive tried to be nice, its difficult when you are repeatedly insulted and ignored.

2683:

of his own page. Yet, when attempts are made to place the same image on other pages that relate to his term as

2318:

Non-free files where added to that page as recently as this month. Since you want to edit war Ill take this to

2267:

The software isnt released under a CC license. You cannot release the copyright to something you dont own. See

2197: 2185: 2173: 2086: 1976: 1411: 1132:

is where you re-added the file after I warned you for your previous edit. You subsequently removed the file in

528: 170: 2397:#1,3 & 8. Along with several paragraphs and lengthy examples of why each use violates each point. (PS the 1933: 1885: 513: 155:

File:Satchel Paige.jpg -- because Satchel Paige's participation was a historic event in Puerto Rican baseball.

659:

There is zero sourced cometary about either part of that image. Without sourced cometary how can it pass #8?

1324: 1193: 735: 580:

So if I were to get rid of the drop down so that the text was clearly shown that would make it acceptable?--

135: 2618: 2586: 2527: 2291: 1398: 518: 442: 371: 223: 2290:

Just wanted to drop a note here before anything gets blown out of proportion. Those images were added to

886: 1286: 1022: 979: 949: 919: 298:

Hi. You deleted this image (File:Crozier, Edinburgh from Salisbury Crags.jpg) from my sandbox with this

618: 533: 2510: 2444: 2165: 2035: 1945: 1893: 1839: 1742: 1691: 1658:

isnt something decided on a case by case basis. Non-free files can only be used in articles. Period.

1644: 1526: 1438: 641: 630: 117: 2381: 2342: 2306: 2082: 1767:}}'s syntax in such a way that its rendering didn't have an editable link or any title whatsoever. 1164: 1157: 1115: 1084: 1045: 490: 166: 2466: 2753: 2716: 2452: 2371: 2058: 1860: 1422: 1321: 1237: 1189: 1079:

check the content, this time If u abuse me again, will take this issue to administrators notice

1654:

Please review policy and take the time to actually read it, instead of cherry picking phrases.

2739: 2630: 2613: 2598: 2581: 2563: 2539: 2522: 2474: 2406: 2362: 2326: 2296: 2275: 2233: 2211: 1990: 1818: 1717: 1663: 1620: 1596: 1457: 1343: 1259: 1215: 1141: 1098: 1068: 1014: 990: 965: 935: 894: 876: 850: 831: 800: 786: 743: 716: 695: 681: 667: 599: 585: 571: 563: 547: 498: 428: 352: 332: 312: 283: 246:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Templates#Spaces_in_templates_such_as_.7B.7Btl.7Ccite_journal.7D.7D

219: 205: 186: 94: 72: 65: 47: 17: 2660: 2518: 2109: 1676:

Sorry, for suggesting that the guideline about posting non-free images in a <gallery: -->

1580: 1018: 559: 543: 391: 275: 1347: 756:

it only contains two non-free files, which are of the packaging of subject of the article.

538:

Those are all hidden in collapsed columns just listing the associated brands. Thus failing

2708: 2031: 1941: 1889: 1835: 1764: 1753: 1738: 1687: 1640: 1522: 1448:

I should report you for NPA, my actions are 100% in policy. Graphics Lab isnt exempt from

1434: 1373:, please, read —and strive to comprehend— them in full. This includes following links to " 1336: 1317: 1184: 637: 556:. Perhaps this is an issue that we should get other opinions on or find some precedence? 113: 1555:

which I referenced isn't negotiable, you do not have the option to ignore it. Using the

867:

is just that of raw food, and cannot be copyrighted as that particular food stuff fails

2731: 2727: 2634: 2602: 2573: 2555: 2543: 2394: 2376: 2337: 2319: 2301: 1981: 1925: 1881: 1709: 1705: 1655: 1584: 1573: 1559: 1552: 1449: 1402: 1361: 1252: 1248: 1208: 1204: 1111: 1080: 1060: 1041: 927: 766: 753: 726: 709: 553: 539: 410: 324: 258: 1917:

BWilkins, I think you may have been confused by an out of sequence insertion. Look at

769:

has two non-free files, the primary logo and one that I will be re-tagging as failing

2749: 2712: 2448: 2254: 2203: 2062: 2054: 1864: 1701: 1631: 1588: 1332: 1278: 1271: 1233: 1226: 976: 957: 946: 916: 486: 482: 471: 402: 985:

Take a look at bullet point #4. The flag will never be acceptable on the list page.

2735: 2676: 2559: 2470: 2402: 2358: 2322: 2271: 2229: 2207: 2050: 1986: 1814: 1713: 1659: 1616: 1592: 1453: 1339: 1255: 1211: 1137: 1094: 1064: 986: 961: 931: 890: 872: 846: 827: 796: 782: 774: 757: 739: 712: 691: 677: 663: 595: 581: 567: 494: 464: 424: 345: 328: 305: 279: 182: 90: 1277:

Hello Werieth. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

915:

Thought your summary edit allowed the flag to be posted back on the flags page.

868: 770: 2656: 2105: 1093:

I did, you re-added the file, I warned, and reverted. Pretty standard practice.

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2200:

including the elephant it goes beyond plain text and is thus fully copyrighted.

2757: 2743: 2720: 2664: 2639: 2607: 2567: 2548: 2504: 2478: 2410: 2387: 2366: 2348: 2330: 2312: 2279: 2261: 2237: 2215: 2188:

the reason that that file cannot be used is that it is copyrighted. You cited

2177: 2113: 2090: 2070: 2039: 1994: 1949: 1897: 1872: 1843: 1822: 1808: 1784: 1746: 1721: 1695: 1667: 1648: 1624: 1600: 1461: 1452:. If think it requires an exemption please file a request for such exemption. 1442: 1295: 1263: 1241: 1219: 1197: 1145: 1119: 1102: 1088: 1072: 1049: 1026: 994: 969: 939: 898: 880: 854: 835: 804: 790: 747: 720: 699: 685: 671: 645: 603: 589: 575: 502: 455: 432: 395: 357: 336: 317: 287: 267: 227: 190: 174: 121: 98: 79: 2578:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Visual_arts#Okay_Hot-Shot.2C_Okay.21_source_images

2469:

the building is already in operation. Thus anyone can go take a photo of it.

1569:

and has applied it correctly is extremely rude and condescending. The use of

1798: 1774: 1110:

I have not added any image file, If u abuse me again, will report to admin

1037: 706:

Tiger Brand's first product was a breakfast oatmeal brand called Jungle Oats

249: 2521:

articles. Why are you coming down on this one. I have reverted your edit.--

1281:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 704:

Talking a look at the article text there is one sentence about Jungle Oats

762: 730: 2158:

These are 5 articles out of tens of thousands in the exact same manner.

2049:

Just to let you know, "announcements" (such as backlogs) belong only on

1579:

is reserved for those actions that everyone knows they shouldn't do, IE

1056: 690:

Please don't take this the wrong way but I find that a bit pedantic.--

1615:

wikipedia does have a lot of policies that you need to comply with.

1499:

Human and imperfect with feet of clay. But perhaps you're different.

413:

it cannot be used on your user page, and that is why it was removed.

401:

Several points, Please remove the Flag icon from your signiture per

2354: 2102:

Talk:List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations

1700:

Wow, you lack of understanding is shocking, I have not referenced

1677:

might be relevant to posting non-free images in a <gallery: -->

1354:

Regarding your recent deletions at the Photography workshop...

25: 1591:

page, and please remove your foot from your mouth when done.

889:

which seems to still have an unclear status in this regard.--

2228:

which is free and can be used to replace the elephant logo.

1174:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1156: 86:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

64: 2196:

which is just text and thus cannot be copyrighted. Due to

2353:

Your "reasonable defense" holds about as much water as a

2030:

about the non-free content practices presently in use. --

1977:

A good example of how to approach someone with a question

1433:

Thank you for your time, attention, and consideration, --

218:

Keep up the good work cleaning up those NFCC violations!

2401:

is a colloquialism and not meant as a personal attack).

566:

are in fact fairly clear about not allowing this usage.

378: 373: 2711:. How do you suggest this problem is overcome? Thanks. 2104:, I'm encouraging all involved since January to do so. 1918: 1760: 1401:

listed explicitly in the exemptions category, it seems

1391:

Category:Knowledge non-free content criteria exemptions

1370: 1133: 1129: 1125: 299: 241: 2612:

P.S. I am no longer following her. Let's meet there.--

2432:

I have now given a suitable and viable reason why the

1405:

to infer that this was simply an oversight as part of

327:

to prevent duplication and excessive reference lists.

248:, where I raised it a few days ago, before your edit. 134:

You did not respond to my last entry (5/31/13) re the

2100:

Hi Werieth. I invite you to feedback on my views in

1386:

as necessary to creating or managing the encyclopedia

2707:; his image is removed as it is appears to not meet 1704:

at any point in my discussion. I in fact referenced

1565:

to someone who you are not familiar with, who knows

1036:reverted vandalism, no build is destroyed here in 738:which so often afflicts Africa related articles.-- 240:Hallo, I wonder what your basis is for edits like 2149:1992–93 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team 885:Fair enough. These pictures are most similar to 477:Additionally I am going to re-add the picture of 2154:1991–92 Duke Blue Devils men's basketball team 1407:the work we do involves addressing files with 2558:. You dont need 5 images for two paragraphs. 8: 1880:p.s.— FYI, there's a parallel thread at the 1283:Article claims coverage in reliable sources. 2730:says we need to keep the usage minimal and 2184:I think you are referring to my removal of 752:Its not any kind of bias, taking a look at 2517:It is common to include source artwork in 1888:on the Photo workshop talk page as well -- 1636:#Non-free image use in galleries or tables 1163:Hello, Werieth. You have new messages at 71:Hello, Werieth. You have new messages at 2670:Help with understanding fair use of image 2130:Here is just a small sample of examples: 2554:I have re-removed the files for failing 2295:visual identification of the elements" ( 779:File:Jungle Oats 1930 & 2010 box.png 655:File:Jungle Oats 1930 & 2010 box.png 2580:. Please come explain your rationale.-- 2139:1995 Nebraska Cornhuskers football team 781:, it is just being used for eye candy. 405:, two please fix the formatting. Three 2224:PS with a little digging I discovered 2190:2010 Ohio State Buckeyes football team 2134:2010 Ohio State Buckeyes football team 278:Its do-able just makes things harder. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 865:File:Quaker-Oats-ChocChip-Granola.jpg 276:The Cambridge University Reading test 7: 2399:holds about as much water as a sieve 1128:is where you inserted the file, and 911:File:AustralianFederalPoliceFlag.png 2748:Thanks. That really helps. Cheers. 2687:, e.g. NSW state elections held in 1732:Cook Islands National Football Team 1542:Knowledge:Non-free content criteria 1393:." —bold italics added for emphasis 2375: 2336: 2300: 1470:Already did so. (Filed a request.) 623:Same as above just not collapsed. 24: 2709:non-free use rationale guidelines 2372:Thanks for keeping it civil, dude 2194:File:Ohio State Buckeyes logo.svg 926:No. Did you also use the account 859:No, due to copyright issues. See 481:as I feel that it does adhere to 212:The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar 1547:policy with legal considerations 1545:This page documents a Knowledge 1312:Fairfield Stags men's ice hockey 861:commons:Commons:Derivative works 390: 204: 29: 2440:Tom 19:00, 23 June 2013 (UTC) 2425:Replaceable fair use File issue 2382: 2377: 2343: 2338: 2307: 2302: 2258: 2255: 524:File:Jungle oats enegry bar.jpg 2681:National Archives of Australia 2144:1978 USC Trojans football team 626:This file is almost certainly 1: 1834:thanks for noticing, CMBJ. -- 407:File:Red Rose (Socialism).svg 1009:Hidden text: Non-free images 448: 2248:File:UIQ 3.1 Screenshot.gif 409:is a non-free file and per 2776: 2269:Knowledge:Derivative_works 1940:and gone on from there. -- 1934:links on the workshop page 1882:non-free content talk page 1613:Knowledge:List of policies 1327:13:54, 18 June 2013 (CST) 1311: 1270:Speedy deletion declined: 765:, its parent organization 294:Deletion of fair use image 2758:03:39, 29 June 2013 (UTC) 2744:02:29, 29 June 2013 (UTC) 2721:02:27, 29 June 2013 (UTC) 2665:21:49, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 2640:18:35, 25 June 2013 (UTC) 2608:18:34, 25 June 2013 (UTC) 2568:18:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC) 2549:18:16, 25 June 2013 (UTC) 2505:04:46, 24 June 2013 (UTC) 2479:19:12, 23 June 2013 (UTC) 2411:15:49, 23 June 2013 (UTC) 2388:15:40, 23 June 2013 (UTC) 2367:15:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC) 2349:15:35, 23 June 2013 (UTC) 2331:15:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC) 2313:15:25, 23 June 2013 (UTC) 2280:14:27, 23 June 2013 (UTC) 2262:14:23, 23 June 2013 (UTC) 2238:18:35, 22 June 2013 (UTC) 2226:File:CrimsonTideAlogo.png 2216:18:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC) 2198:File:AlabamaLogo-1992.png 2186:File:AlabamaLogo-1992.png 2178:17:09, 22 June 2013 (UTC) 2114:10:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC) 2091:07:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC) 2071:16:23, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 2040:18:15, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 1995:17:47, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 1950:17:27, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 1898:14:43, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 1873:16:26, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 1844:13:20, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 1823:14:26, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 1809:09:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 1785:08:45, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 1747:08:06, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 1722:22:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC) 1696:22:44, 18 June 2013 (UTC) 1686:wiki. Goodbye for now, -- 1668:22:28, 18 June 2013 (UTC) 1649:22:25, 18 June 2013 (UTC) 1625:22:01, 18 June 2013 (UTC) 1611:You might want to review 1601:21:52, 18 June 2013 (UTC) 1462:20:30, 18 June 2013 (UTC) 1443:20:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC) 1348:18:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC) 1296:23:41, 15 June 2013 (UTC) 1264:15:54, 13 June 2013 (UTC) 1242:15:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC) 1220:12:11, 12 June 2013 (UTC) 1198:01:55, 12 June 2013 (UTC) 1146:17:13, 10 June 2013 (UTC) 1120:16:51, 10 June 2013 (UTC) 1103:16:50, 10 June 2013 (UTC) 1089:16:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC) 1073:16:26, 10 June 2013 (UTC) 1050:16:00, 10 June 2013 (UTC) 1027:14:26, 10 June 2013 (UTC) 736:Knowledge systematic bias 529:File:Energade bottles.jpg 203: 995:19:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC) 982:18:56 7 June 2013 (UTC) 970:18:51, 7 June 2013 (UTC) 952:18:45 7 June 2013 (UTC) 940:16:43, 7 June 2013 (UTC) 922:16:37 7 June 2013 (UTC) 899:14:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 881:12:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 855:11:37, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 836:11:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 805:11:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC) 791:20:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 748:20:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 721:14:26, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 700:14:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 686:12:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 672:11:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 646:08:01, 6 June 2013 (UTC) 604:14:26, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 590:14:22, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 576:12:51, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 542:second clause. See also 514:File:Lucky Star Fish.jpg 503:10:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 456:04:26, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 433:20:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC) 396:20:12, 3 June 2013 (UTC) 358:16:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC) 337:16:18, 3 June 2013 (UTC) 318:16:12, 3 June 2013 (UTC) 288:12:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC) 268:12:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC) 228:02:56, 3 June 2013 (UTC) 191:02:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC) 175:02:48, 3 June 2013 (UTC) 122:16:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC) 99:22:59, 31 May 2013 (UTC) 80:08:57, 1 June 2013 (UTC) 2467:the source of the image 1630:Werieth, please review 1399:Knowledge:Graphics labs 1397:While I didn't see the 136:Baseball in Puerto Rico 127:Baseball in Puerto Rico 2726:That is quite simple, 2292:Colonist (The X-Files) 1551:bolding for emphasis. 1395: 1161: 1057:WP:3RR##3RR_exemptions 795:That's a fair point.-- 69: 1381: 1165:SoapFan12's talk page 1160: 68: 42:of past discussions. 2511:Okay Hot-Shot, Okay! 1063:is exempt from 3RR. 519:File:TNT popcorn.jpg 104:Non-free image usage 95:Want to have a chat? 1587:and the associated 1371:you cite guidelines 1301:Beach Soccer images 887:File:Quaker7297.JPG 491:Quaker Oats Company 236:Spaces in templates 197:A barnstar for you! 73:Nford24's talk page 2025:This still leaves 1425:comes rolling in. 1172:remove this notice 1162: 84:remove this notice 70: 2663: 2638: 2606: 2547: 2501: 2461: 2447:comment added by 2168:comment added by 2119:Sports team logos 2096:Activated debates 1855:talk page stalker 1830:talk page stalker 619:File:Koo Logo.jpg 479:Jungle oats boxes 444:CarringtonEnglish 374:CarringtonEnglish 233: 232: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Werieth 2767: 2659: 2616: 2584: 2525: 2519:Roy Lichtenstein 2503: 2499: 2494: 2460: 2441: 2386: 2384: 2379: 2347: 2345: 2340: 2311: 2309: 2304: 2259: 2257: 2180: 2065: 1939: 1930: 1924: 1867: 1858: 1833: 1807: 1805: 1783: 1781: 1578: 1572: 1564: 1558: 1416: 1410: 1366: 1360: 1175: 635: 629: 534:File:Koo can.jpg 454: 452: 445: 420: 394: 385: 375: 355: 348: 325:Named references 315: 308: 265: 256: 208: 201: 200: 87: 33: 32: 26: 2775: 2774: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2672: 2652: 2515: 2496: 2490: 2487: 2442: 2427: 2288: 2251: 2163: 2121: 2098: 2078: 2061: 2047: 1937: 1928: 1922: 1863: 1852: 1827: 1799: 1792: 1775: 1768: 1758: 1734: 1682:authority over 1576: 1570: 1562: 1556: 1540:Take a look at 1430: 1414: 1412:Non-free reduce 1408: 1364: 1358: 1356: 1318:Fairfield Stags 1314: 1303: 1294: 1275: 1247:They dont meet 1230: 1185:Robert McGinnis 1181: 1179:Robert McGinnis 1176: 1169: 1154: 1034: 1011: 913: 869:commons:COM:TOO 771:commons:COM:TOO 633: 627: 468: 451: 443: 441: 418: 368: 346: 343: 306: 303: 296: 259: 250: 238: 199: 129: 106: 88: 77: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2773: 2771: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2671: 2668: 2651: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2514: 2508: 2486: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2426: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2287: 2286:X-Files images 2284: 2283: 2282: 2250: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2219: 2218: 2201: 2170:24.126.172.165 2120: 2117: 2097: 2094: 2083:El3ctr1csheepz 2077: 2074: 2046: 2043: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1847: 1846: 1757: 1750: 1733: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1671: 1670: 1628: 1627: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1581:Blocking Jimbo 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1465: 1464: 1428: 1369:Werieth, when 1355: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1331:Please review 1313: 1310: 1308: 1302: 1299: 1290: 1285:Thank you. — 1274: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1229: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1180: 1177: 1168: 1155: 1153: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1076: 1075: 1033: 1030: 1010: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 928:User:Expatkiwi 912: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 845:photographs?-- 839: 838: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 777:does not need 767:Hostess Brands 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 531: 526: 521: 516: 510: 509: 467: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 449: 422: 421: 415: 414: 367: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 295: 292: 291: 290: 237: 234: 231: 230: 215: 214: 209: 198: 195: 194: 193: 167:Nelsondenis248 164: 163: 162: 161: 160: 159: 156: 153: 145: 144: 128: 125: 105: 102: 78:Message added 76: 63: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2772: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2669: 2667: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2649: 2641: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2615: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2524: 2520: 2513:source images 2512: 2509: 2507: 2506: 2502: 2493: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2465:According to 2464: 2463: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2438: 2435: 2430: 2424: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2385: 2380: 2373: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2346: 2341: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2321: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2310: 2305: 2298: 2293: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2270: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2260: 2249: 2245: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2202: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2159: 2156: 2155: 2151: 2150: 2146: 2145: 2141: 2140: 2136: 2135: 2131: 2128: 2125: 2118: 2116: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2095: 2093: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2075: 2073: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2053:, and not on 2052: 2044: 2042: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2028: 2023: 2019: 2016: 2011: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1983: 1978: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1935: 1927: 1920: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1900: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1886:relevant post 1883: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1856: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1831: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1806: 1804: 1803: 1797: 1796: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1782: 1780: 1779: 1773: 1772: 1766: 1762: 1755: 1751: 1749: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1731: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1637: 1633: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1575: 1568: 1561: 1554: 1550: 1548: 1543: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1431: 1426: 1424: 1419: 1418: 1413: 1404: 1400: 1394: 1392: 1388: 1387: 1380: 1378: 1377: 1372: 1367: 1363: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1326: 1323: 1322:PensRule11385 1319: 1309: 1306: 1300: 1298: 1297: 1293: 1288: 1287:Malik Shabazz 1284: 1280: 1279:Akihiko Saito 1273: 1272:Akihiko Saito 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1228: 1227:Limerick F.C. 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1190:Verne Equinox 1186: 1178: 1173: 1166: 1159: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1077: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1059:#5 Enforcing 1058: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1031: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1008: 996: 992: 988: 984: 983: 981: 978: 973: 972: 971: 967: 963: 959: 954: 953: 951: 948: 943: 942: 941: 937: 933: 929: 925: 924: 923: 921: 918: 910: 900: 896: 892: 888: 884: 883: 882: 878: 874: 870: 866: 862: 858: 857: 856: 852: 848: 843: 842: 841: 840: 837: 833: 829: 826: 825: 806: 802: 798: 794: 793: 792: 788: 784: 780: 776: 772: 768: 764: 759: 755: 751: 750: 749: 745: 741: 737: 732: 728: 724: 723: 722: 718: 714: 711: 707: 703: 702: 701: 697: 693: 689: 688: 687: 683: 679: 675: 674: 673: 669: 665: 661: 660: 658: 657: 656: 653: 647: 643: 639: 632: 625: 624: 622: 621: 620: 617: 605: 601: 597: 593: 592: 591: 587: 583: 579: 578: 577: 573: 569: 565: 561: 558: 557: 555: 551: 550: 549: 545: 541: 537: 536: 535: 532: 530: 527: 525: 522: 520: 517: 515: 512: 511: 507: 506: 505: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 475: 473: 466: 463: 457: 453: 446: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 430: 426: 417: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 399: 398: 397: 393: 389: 388: 384: 381: 377: 376: 365: 359: 354: 350: 349: 340: 339: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 321: 320: 319: 314: 310: 309: 301: 293: 289: 285: 281: 277: 272: 271: 270: 269: 266: 264: 263: 257: 255: 254: 247: 243: 235: 229: 225: 221: 217: 216: 213: 210: 207: 202: 196: 192: 188: 184: 179: 178: 177: 176: 172: 168: 157: 154: 151: 150: 149: 148: 147: 146: 141: 140: 139: 137: 132: 126: 124: 123: 119: 115: 109: 103: 101: 100: 96: 92: 85: 81: 74: 67: 59: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2677:Robert Askin 2673: 2653: 2614:TonyTheTiger 2582:TonyTheTiger 2523:TonyTheTiger 2516: 2488: 2443:— Preceding 2439: 2431: 2428: 2398: 2289: 2252: 2164:— Preceding 2160: 2157: 2152: 2147: 2142: 2137: 2132: 2129: 2126: 2122: 2099: 2079: 2048: 2026: 2024: 2020: 2014: 2012: 2009: 1879: 1801: 1800: 1794: 1793: 1777: 1776: 1770: 1769: 1759: 1735: 1683: 1679: 1629: 1566: 1546: 1544: 1518: 1432: 1427: 1420: 1406: 1396: 1385: 1384: 1382: 1375: 1368: 1357: 1315: 1307: 1304: 1282: 1276: 1231: 1182: 1109: 1035: 1012: 914: 775:Tiger Brands 758:Tiger Brands 705: 476: 469: 465:Tiger Brands 423: 387: 372: 369: 344: 304: 297: 261: 260: 252: 251: 239: 220:Technical 13 211: 165: 133: 130: 110: 108:Hi Werieth, 107: 89: 55: 43: 37: 2192:which uses 1919:the history 1203:This fails 1134:these edits 1032:3RR penalty 1019:Dirtlawyer1 631:PD-textlogo 36:This is an 2631:WP:CHICAGO 2599:WP:CHICAGO 2540:WP:CHICAGO 2492:This, that 2297:WP:NFLISTS 2204:WP:NFC#UUI 2076:User Pages 2045:AN not ANI 2032:Kevjonesin 1942:Kevjonesin 1890:Kevjonesin 1836:Kevjonesin 1739:Fenix down 1688:Kevjonesin 1641:Kevjonesin 1523:Kevjonesin 1435:Kevjonesin 1403:reasonable 1376:exemptions 1015:WP:NONFREE 638:Cckerberos 564:WP:NFTABLE 548:WP:NFTABLE 366:Greetings! 114:Gtrbolivar 82:. You can 2732:WP:NFCC#8 2728:WP:NFCC#3 2679:from the 2650:Sandboxes 2574:WP:NFCC#8 2556:WP:NFCC#8 2498:the other 2378:Gen. Quon 2339:Gen. Quon 2303:Gen. Quon 1982:WP:NFCC#9 1761:This edit 1706:WP:NFCC#9 1656:WP:NFCC#9 1583:. Review 1553:WP:NFCC#9 1450:WP:NFCC#9 1253:WP:NFCC#8 1249:WP:NFCC#3 1209:WP:NFCC#8 1205:WP:NFCC#8 1112:Murrallli 1081:Murrallli 1042:Murrallli 1038:film noir 754:WP:NFCC#8 727:WP:NFCC#8 710:WP:NFCC#8 560:WP:NFLIST 554:WP:NFCC#8 544:WP:NFLIST 540:WP:NFCC#8 411:WP:NFCC#9 131:Werieth, 2750:Rangasyd 2713:Rangasyd 2457:contribs 2449:Tomdaone 2445:unsigned 2166:unsigned 2063:BWilkins 2013:Clearly 1884:. And a 1865:BWilkins 1763:broke {{ 1423:pettifog 1337:WP:NFURG 1234:Corcs999 1170:You can 1152:Talkback 977:KiwiDean 947:KiwiDean 917:KiwiDean 763:Twinkies 731:Twinkies 487:WP:NFC#8 483:WP:NFC#8 342:again.-- 60:Talkback 2736:Werieth 2685:Premier 2635:WP:FOUR 2603:WP:FOUR 2560:Werieth 2544:WP:FOUR 2471:Werieth 2429:Hello, 2403:Werieth 2395:WP:NFCC 2359:Werieth 2323:Werieth 2320:WP:NFCR 2272:Werieth 2230:Werieth 2208:Werieth 1987:Werieth 1815:Werieth 1802:C M B J 1778:C M B J 1714:Werieth 1710:WP:NFCC 1660:Werieth 1634:, i.e. 1617:Werieth 1593:Werieth 1585:WP:NFCC 1454:Werieth 1340:Werieth 1256:Werieth 1212:Werieth 1138:Werieth 1095:Werieth 1065:Werieth 1061:WP:NFCC 987:Werieth 962:Werieth 932:Werieth 891:Discott 873:Werieth 847:Discott 828:Werieth 797:Discott 783:Werieth 740:Discott 713:Werieth 692:Discott 678:Werieth 664:Discott 596:Werieth 582:Discott 568:Werieth 495:Discott 425:Werieth 347:SabreBD 329:Werieth 307:SabreBD 280:Werieth 183:Werieth 91:Nford24 39:archive 2703:, and 2657:Hiding 2500:(talk) 2383:(Talk) 2344:(Talk) 2308:(Talk) 2106:Adam37 2055:WP:ANI 1765:Austin 1754:Austin 1702:WP:NFG 1632:WP:NFG 1589:WP:NFC 1567:policy 1333:WP:NFC 980:(talk) 960:case. 958:WP:SPI 950:(talk) 472:WP:NFC 403:WP:SIG 2489::) — 2355:sieve 2051:WP:AN 1938:W-T-F 1926:trout 1574:trout 1560:trout 1417:tags. 1362:trout 1292:Stalk 419:] ] ] 16:< 2754:talk 2740:talk 2717:talk 2705:1973 2701:1971 2697:1968 2693:1965 2689:1962 2564:talk 2495:and 2485:Bump 2475:talk 2453:talk 2434:file 2407:talk 2363:talk 2327:talk 2276:talk 2246:re: 2234:talk 2212:talk 2174:talk 2110:talk 2087:talk 2036:talk 1991:talk 1980:per 1946:talk 1894:talk 1840:talk 1819:talk 1743:talk 1718:talk 1692:talk 1680:your 1664:talk 1645:talk 1621:talk 1597:talk 1527:talk 1519:p.s. 1458:talk 1439:talk 1429:: } 1344:talk 1335:and 1325:Talk 1260:talk 1251:and 1238:talk 1216:talk 1194:talk 1142:talk 1130:this 1126:this 1116:talk 1099:talk 1085:talk 1069:talk 1055:See 1046:talk 1023:talk 991:talk 966:talk 936:talk 920:talk 895:talk 877:talk 851:talk 832:talk 801:talk 787:talk 744:talk 717:talk 696:talk 682:talk 668:talk 642:talk 600:talk 594:No. 586:talk 572:talk 562:and 546:and 499:talk 450:Talk 429:talk 353:talk 333:talk 313:talk 300:edit 284:talk 242:this 224:talk 187:talk 171:talk 143:are: 118:talk 2627:BIO 2595:BIO 2536:BIO 2374:.-- 2027:how 2015:how 1684:our 1379:". 253:Pam 2756:) 2742:) 2719:) 2699:, 2695:, 2691:, 2637:) 2605:) 2566:) 2546:) 2477:) 2459:) 2455:• 2409:) 2365:) 2357:. 2329:) 2278:) 2236:) 2214:) 2176:) 2112:) 2089:) 2069:) 2067:←✎ 2059:✉→ 2038:) 1993:) 1948:) 1929:}} 1923:{{ 1896:) 1871:) 1869:←✎ 1861:✉→ 1842:) 1821:) 1795:— 1771:— 1756:}} 1752:{{ 1745:) 1720:) 1694:) 1666:) 1647:) 1623:) 1599:) 1577:}} 1571:{{ 1563:}} 1557:{{ 1460:) 1441:) 1415:}} 1409:{{ 1365:}} 1359:{{ 1346:) 1262:) 1240:) 1218:) 1196:) 1144:) 1118:) 1101:) 1087:) 1071:) 1048:) 1025:) 993:) 968:) 938:) 930:? 897:) 879:) 863:. 853:) 834:) 803:) 789:) 746:) 719:) 698:) 684:) 670:) 644:) 636:. 634:}} 628:{{ 602:) 588:) 574:) 501:) 431:) 356:) 335:) 316:) 286:) 226:) 189:) 173:) 120:) 97:) 2752:( 2738:( 2715:( 2661:T 2633:/ 2629:/ 2625:/ 2623:C 2621:/ 2619:T 2617:( 2601:/ 2597:/ 2593:/ 2591:C 2589:/ 2587:T 2585:( 2562:( 2542:/ 2538:/ 2534:/ 2532:C 2530:/ 2528:T 2526:( 2473:( 2451:( 2405:( 2361:( 2325:( 2274:( 2256:w 2232:( 2210:( 2172:( 2108:( 2085:( 2057:( 2034:( 1989:( 1944:( 1892:( 1857:) 1853:( 1838:( 1832:) 1828:( 1817:( 1741:( 1716:( 1690:( 1662:( 1643:( 1619:( 1595:( 1549:. 1529:) 1525:( 1456:( 1437:( 1342:( 1289:/ 1258:( 1236:( 1214:( 1192:( 1167:. 1140:( 1114:( 1097:( 1083:( 1067:( 1044:( 1021:( 989:( 964:( 934:( 893:( 875:( 849:( 830:( 799:( 785:( 742:( 715:( 694:( 680:( 666:( 640:( 598:( 584:( 570:( 497:( 427:( 383:C 380:T 351:( 331:( 311:( 282:( 262:D 222:( 185:( 169:( 116:( 93:( 75:. 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index