2966:. I will certainly seek that, as I simply cannot seem to get the point accross to you that these are not simply "files showing the same person", they are a variety of images: film screen shots, magazine covers, commemorative stamps etc. None of them comparable images with a free use alternative. If they were simply 12 potraits of Madhubala with no contextual relevance, I would totally understand your point. However, they are not this at all. But I will seek the third opinion. Thanks for your time and opinions. While mildy frustrated, I do appreciate your efforts and motivations in keeping Knowledge to a high standard.
2661:. The veracity of the "self" licence has been called into question and the image nominated for deletion. I can't upload the new image (taken two or three days ago) because the facility isn't open to me on the page. So I sent it to permissions last Friday and that hasn't been registered on the image page yet. What I'm worried about is that the image will get deleted and I will need to post the new image to replace it, then somebody will get on my case for not doing things according to protocol. That's just one of two or three issues.
2807:, that is simply not applicable to these images: re Minimal useage , the images are not just images of Madhubala for identification. They are there to support the text on specific points (ie, break through role in a film, most significant film role, appearance on Magazine covers underlining popularity, iconography through postage stamp issued on her etc, rare public appearance, her gravestone which has been demolished etc) Re minimal extent of use, I purposly chose low resoloution and cropped images.
31:
1796:. Most articles on military units are of one page which means that minimal usage is a single use of the unit's distinctive identifying insignia. You obviously don't have a problem with that. The UDR article is very likely unique on Knowledge because of the size of the unit, it's many large sub-divisions and the notability of the history of them all. So how does one interpret minimal usage in that situation?
993:
632:
of the image to illustrate it in the "parent" article is anything less than educational and encyclopaedic. The political poster is in itself a political comment but if you'd taken the time to read the talk page you'd see that the article is being rewritten at the moment and further text will be going into that section to qualify the use of the poster as an illustration.
2003:
and prove my ownership of images. I think I've sorted most of it out now by rescanning originals and using a larger portion of the original in the case of one digital image. What finally persuaded me to calm down though was the appearance of three "vultures" - not sure if you noticed or not? Anyhoo - is there anything which is still outstanding in your opinion?
1235:. Bearing in mind the comments I have viewed on your talk page my attitude is somewhat changed and I can promise you I will not set the police on you. Nor am I personal friends with any football players and I will not ask the Queen to put you in jail! The worst I might do is drink your beer when your back is turned to wreak my revenge upon you.
761:. It was inappropriate for you to delete SonOfSetanta's RFC eventhough you were correct that NFCR is the right venue. I or another uninvolved sysop could/would have closed that with a note pointing to the NFCR discussion. SonOfSetanta's action although incorrect in opening a talk page discussion is well within teh bounds of a good faith mistake--
2403:
to permit the use. The name of each article (a link to each article is also recommended) in which fair use is claimed for the item, and a separate, specific non-free use rationale for each use of the item, as explained at
Knowledge:Non-free use rationale guideline. The rationale is presented in clear, plain language and is relevant to each use.
580:"Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." In all three cases the images were directly related to the text and would significantly improve the readers' understanding of the topic.
2267:, the external link you are reverting isn't really an external link, all it does is read the header information of the browser and redirect the user to their own language Knowledge. What I'm creating is an experimental museum guide using Knowledge (I'm the Wikimedian in Residence for the Natural History Museum in London).
2721:
Unless you can provide provenance for the copyright of an image proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the image is under a free license, assume that its copyrighted. My best suggestion for you would be to ensure your I's are dotted and your T's are crossed, and all your ducks are in a row before you upload any image.
2814:
As far as the point on "No free
Equivalent" you cannot generalise or equate a screen shot of madhubala's face with a photo of her on a magazine cover, her grave, a commemorative stamp, photo with her spouce etc. In view of all this, and when comparable images are rife on wikipedia on pages for Bette
2810:
Contextual significance is also supported by the above points. They are all there not just to show a photo pf
Madhubala but are relevant to specific points made in the text. I would request that you read the article to see the relevance of the photos I attached to it. Consequently, I really dont see
2410:
Please understand i am not challenging you. Only trying to gain a better understanding of how they did not meet the criteria given the above, and what i need to do to make them usable as I feel the greatly enhance the articl and validate and add to points made in the body of the text. Thank you again
1960:
It looks like the discussion at the
Administrators Noticeboard has failed to produce any results whatsoever but what it has done is provide discussion time which I for one have found useful. It's also given me time to research more about copyright and my understanding is greatly improved as a result.
689:
I don't accept your comments and I must now warn you that you have broken an arbitration enforcement by making two reverts on a
Northern Ireland Troubles page within 24 hours, thereby engaging in edit warring. I respectfully suggest you revert yourself. If you fail to do so I will raise a complaint
631:
I disagree. Having an historic document such as the application form included is an appropriate enhancement to the text which describes where and how application forms could be acquired. The aftermath may have its own article, which is correctly referenced in the text but that doesn't mean that use
563:
Hi
Newsjunky, thank you for clarifying what the problem is. That makes more sense to me and I will have a look at updating the text used on the page to be more article like. What was confusing me was that the same format and wording was taken from other pages, so I guess if you delete this one then I
559:
Hi all, im going to jump into this debate. I think if this article is turned into an actual company article we can keep it. The way it is now is like
Werieth said, to much like an advertisement. So as of now I say delete but if you can change it to an actual company article with info about it and not
2720:
Im not saying that either, Im not sure what license they would fall under. Does the Open
Government License affect works retroactively? otherwise it wouldn't fall under that category. I really don't have the time nor the interest in tracking down and verifying copyright for every one of your images.
2406:
Moreover
Madhubala died in 1960. All of the photographers and people associated with her generation of film making are also dead. Where screen caps were used i took them form tailers and created themsleves, and other images are in the public domain unless stated, used in a variety of sources, be it,
2402:
Image description page. The image or media description page contains the following: Identification of the source of the material, supplemented, where possible, with information about the artist, publisher and copyright holder A copyright tag that indicates which
Knowledge policy provision is claimed
1803:
I have created a badge which is a free use image. In doing so I expected you to agree that it was the best way forward for the moment until the question of minimal use of the original image can be resolved. You seem to have taken great exception to this and why I can't understand because the image
141:
May be you should look at the sources still and the article and see how it passes notability. And in the discussion you provided a link to there is no consensus that hung-art.com is not an RS (though some pages are clearly commercial, I do not see why Geza Pap page is). And no, I have no POV, I just
2927:
This is dissapointing. It seems every time I answer your reason for the deletion of the images, you change the reason they were deleted. The images ALL meet the Non-fee content policy as well as fair use. All 10 points, in fact, are met and Knowledge is clear that, in such cases they may be used. I
2878:
as you asserted earlier. Your saying theres an issue with why the images are there and their significance /context yet you have no issue of Bette Davies having a photo of her death memorial, a photo of katharine Hepburn in "break through role", famous role, later life etc... All comparable images I
2869:
When I sited Katharine Hepburn, Bette Davis etc I was talking about WHAT the images are and the CONTEXT of them, not wether they are free or not. This was the comparison. Knowledge does have a fair use policy and I have already demonstrated these images I uploaded meet the criterion for fair use as
2759:
and that they are specifically tagged as having an Open Government Licence. I don't have the time or interest in this either but as you and I had agreed to work together to "educate" me on copyright I thought I could depend on you for answers - or are you now saying you don't want to help? For my
2002:
I was always willing Werieth, I promise that. I'm 100% genuine and I hope I'm perceived as a hard working Wikipedian? I guess I got frustrated, mainly because most of the images on articles I was working on came under scrutiny and I couldn't understand why. I was working like a madman to assert
505:
This seems unfair. Can you explain why this page would be flagged for deletion? LearnUpon is an original and existing entity and is complying with the other lists of LMS entities as per this page here. Can you explain why the page suffers differences compared to DoceboLMS etc? Thanks in advance for
2853:
an image of someone's grave stone just isnt significant enough to justify a non-free file in most cases. Most of the files you included make the article more visually appealing, but are not required to understand the article about the person, especially given the fact that there is a free image of
1123:
I am talking to you Werieth. Leave me and my updating of holy country Bhutan football,womens football and futsal page on wikipedia. I cant post an image from this account so i must log out to do that. I f you dare to remove anything i update on these pages,and i am personal friend of all bhutanese
931:
Stay off my talk page unless you've got an actual reason to be there. NFCC "violations" don't qualify, as they are the most broadly interpretable rules Knowledge has. Image cops are not welcome to bring their tedious crusade to my page. I encourage you to get a life and pursue a more constructive
536:
Hi, okay, I think I get that, but then I don't quite understand why the other pages are allowed and are legit? With regards providing information about their status and fit to an industry. Can you tell me why or how we can adjust our page to meet the criteria or should these other pages be deleted
2389:
Minimal usage. Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information. Minimal extent of use. An entire work is not used if a portion will suffice. Low- rather than high-resolution/fidelity/bit rate is used (especially where the original could be
2151:
With regards to the book "Basic Battle Skills" - I have posted on the talk page for deleted that my own copy of it predates the supposed 1st Edition date and also examples of earlier copies. This might need a request to the Crown Office for confirmation as there is no printers information in the
2890:
which i have shown they do actually meet these points as well as Wiki fair use policy. Then you have said it is becasue their is a free image of her which is equivalent to them. I have also shown the images are not equivalent because they demonstrate and further source key points in the article,
1939:
Actually leaving the file in place using comments has an extremely high rate of re-violating NFCC, vs removal. I have heard your opinion and disagree with with it. leaving a link only works in a small number of cases, in most cases due to templates or other formatting removal is the best option.
2679:
there are two separate copyright issues here. There are your rights as the photographer and then the copyright of what you are photographing. You can release your part of the copyright but you cannot release that of the subject of the photo. In this case you cannot claim self, because you didnt
1402:
You're responsible for the edits you make with semi-automated tools. As Patrick87 says, after your mistake has been explained, don't just blindly revert your incorrect removal in without checking. You know, you might even consider an apology for the inconvenience caused to other editors. Just a
1369:
Its not a bot, I wasnt aware of how GLNF worked, I was working off a report of NFCC#9 violations and didnt realize that that had already been fixed, and I ran into a case mediawiki was providing incorrect information about the image. (It was being reported as still being used on that page by
2362:
on commons. Would you be kind enough to examine the methodology and copyright issues? In this instance I'm working on the basis that; if the badge was created in 1793 then copyright will no longer be valid. These Crown Copyright issues are the only ones I'm still having any bother with.
1623:
Listen, you power tripping nerd, do you REALLY think that Socialist International is going to SUE you, me, or Wikimedia for displaying the SI logo on my page? You're making too big a deal of too small an issue. Go do something more productive on here, as it seems this issue is all you worry
2768:(also on the defence imagery website) is under open licence and that website informs me that all its images are, I will now update those image pages I have identified as incorrectly licenced. I don't have the time or interest to do so but I will - because it's the right thing to do!
2382:
Hello thank you for your help and advice. Having reviewed the Non-free image critera and image uploading policies , could you possibly guide me more specifically how these images dont meet requirements, because as far as I understood they are usable for the following reasons:
2910:
he has had some very major roles and several very defining visual styles but because they are non-free we dont use them. Knowledge's non-free content policy is actually far more strict than fair use, these uses may pass fair use but do not pass the non-free content policy.
2891:
rather than just showing a potrait of Madhubala. Lastly you questioned contextual significance without reading the article it seems, yet similar contextual photos in other articles are acceptable to you? Am just confused why its one rule for some and another for others?
2647:
It's all in the article. That particular badge in silver is actually the Royal Irish Rifles cap badge. The Royal Irish Rifles ceased to be in 1921 upon the partition of Ireland and although all it meant in practice was a name change, the badge changed from silver to
480:, which contains a warning for both parties. If you allow the regular process to run its course on the copyright boards, you should have no further problems. If you add or remove any images before the boards have made their decision, blocks are possible. Thank you,
1734:
No I won't. Just because you've got some sort of grudge against me using military insignia doesn't mean you can block me. What you're forgetting is that you are leaving a trail a mile wide of petulant behaviour regarding this issue. You are totally ignoring
821:. This is clearly signposted at the top of the talk page. Calil has observed this is obviously a good faith error on your part but it has now been pointed out to you several times that you are in breach of ArbCom conditions for posting on articles concerning
586:
1. The image of an application form isn't related to the provision of application forms. 2. The image of the aftermath of the Glenanne bombing isn't related to the Glenanne bombing. 3. Why a political poster shouldn't be used in the section "Political comment"
1654:
Werieth it isn't up to you to decide which is the correct badge and which isn't on military articles. If you remove the free use badges I have now submitted I will consider it edit warring on a "Troubles Related Article" and ask for sanctions to be applied.
1739:. I suggest you take a step back and consider that ALL of us, not just you, are working towards a better wiki. If you have issues about badges then raise them at the correct venues, such as Military History. Collegiate discussion is the way forward not
267:
Actually you are the one who seems to like to edit war, If these files are deleted and it is later determined that they are acceptable undeletion is trivial. NFCC places the burden on those who want to include it, in this case that burden as not been met.
1299:
Sorry, but did you read my comment? You're currently continuing removing hundreds of non-free images from many articles, without leaving a link. As for infoboxes (were a link could produce unexpected results) consider commenting out the image instead.
2928:
spent a great deal of time selecting them and sourcing them according to Wiki policy. It feesl like what ever rationale provided, will simply be rejected. A real pity because they greatly enhanced the credibility and interest of the Madhubala entry.
100:
I do not see why this source is like ebay. Concerning the nomination, this would be a great strategy: first to remove reliable sources from the article, then nominate it for deletion as unsourced. Just try. I may also wish to nominate you to ANI
751:" in violation of the non-free content policy. As such WRT two of the three images I see exactly where your rationale in policy exists but your point on ] is debatable (I think the argument for keeping is tenuous but even still it's not
2118:
I took the picture of the UDR March past and also have other pictures from the series. I no longer have the negatives unfortunately. I have similar pictures of other marches though - in colour, with the negatives. Albeit different
1859:
This photograph was taken by me from my camera. It is a wall painting in a public premises. I understand the error that I have done with the above file name. Pl. delete the above file & then I will again upload the photograph as
2815:
Davis, Katharine Hepburn, Joan crawford etc, I see no rationale for excluding any of these contextually relevanent images that support the article. I would respectfully request that you reconsider, or provide further justification?
2309:
Hi, I'm not sure how File:Audubon Birds of America.jpg is in copyright, the book was published in 1838, John James Audubon died in 1851, I think the file may be incorrectly classified. Please let me know if I've got it
2520:
True enough, which is why the Manual of Style prefers the coded 'en dash' to just using the symbol (–). Makes it easier to distinguish correct usage. Is there a reason you converted the code that I should be aware of?
2798:
Thank you for your response. However I am even more confused. The image that you left as acceptable, is a screen shot from a film. Two of my images were also screen shots. Regarding the images failing on both points
2628:
I havent had time to do the research. But can you confirm somewhere via a RS that that exact emblem was used 100 years ago, and that it hasnt changed since. If you can document that, copyright shouldnt be an issue.
779:
May I respectfully suggest that now you have been made aware of the 1RR ruling by a sysop that you take the correct and honourable course of action and revert your removal of these images as per the ArbCom ruling.
2264:
1268:
Please, if you remove an non-free file, leave a link behind. Links are perfectly fine regarding NFCC#9, removing the images completely often renders comments on talk pages useless unless one digs into history
1894:
sadly it seems you didn't bother about my suggestions offered last time. You're still removing images not satisfying NFCC#9 (which is fine, thank you for that) without any hint on the original file (which is
1827:
1175:
Which of the two solutions would be easier. Adding a Non-free Usage Statement for the main Lyceum University image for use on the Laguna campus page *or* creating a Laguna specific image like the one on
742:
Pursuant to a message on my talk page I'm warning you regarding a breach of the 1RR on troubles. On examination I think this was a good faith mistake so take this as a reminder that pages covered by the
2706:
Ok, so really these fall into the Open Government Licence as detailed by me on the image talk page? If that's the case would you like me to update the licence for this image and the others I found?
912:. There was nothing wrong with your inital removal - you don't need to reinstate the material. The problem lies in the breach of 1RR. And BTW don't rely on exemptions - they don't gauarntee amnesty--
2399:
Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.
2476:, specifically the section "In ranges that might otherwise be expressed with to or through". Hyphens are only used with numbers when connecting that number to a word, like 9-millimetres. Cheers, --
1702:
There's nothing inaccurate about the badge. It's the maid of erin surmounted by a crown. I have a feeling that Calil was correct. You have let this become personal and have turned this into a
2760:
part I am keen to comply with the correct licencing of images and there are barely any issues with those I have uploaded in recent times. The issues arise from earlier posting when I was less
120:
1913:
simply converting the embedded image to a file link? File links are not forbidden by NFCC#9 and prevent comments relying on a non-free file from becoming useless when the file is removed.
127:
policy. I never said I was going to delete it as un-sourced. Feel free to take this to ANI, I am not afraid of your empty threats. ANI shouldnt be used as a threat to enforce your POV.
2764:
with the guidelines. So yes, my i's are dotted and my t's are crossed and all my ducks are in a row but I'm not a copyright expert - you are (or so you say). In any case; given that
2845:
has zero non-free files. In three articles you cited there are a total of 2 non-free files. So in three articles we have about 50 different files and only two of them being non-free.
1961:
I'd like to propose that you and I share a metaphoric handshake and start again. I'd like to have your help in resolving what copyright issues remain regarding images posted by
477:
1016:. If this continues, I will be forced to seek protection for the page, or a temporary block/ban for edit warring and harassment. I also do not appreciate being threatened. (
1314:
Im not removing files from any articles. I am removing them from non-articles where they cannot be used, period. Do not re-inlcude non-free files in a manner that violates
67:. I have found and added the reference myself. If you do not like it, please add another one. Removing the only reference from a (BLP) article is not really constructive.--
2059:
should be re-uploaded and instead of using a crude cut out of the face, a traditional blur should do the same for obfuscating the identity, while not butchering the photo.
459:
1261:
605:
You don't need to see an application to understand the organization, (See #8), the aftermath has its own article and the file is used there no need to duplicate it (See
2550:
Its just part of Unicodifing articles as I edit them. Mixing HTML encoding, hex encoding, and normal chars just gets complex over time. Standardization is just easier.
1706:
because you are determined to stamp some kind of authority on me. Fine: you play by the rules and so will I. You get the badge deleted and I will upload another one.
2386:
Respect for commercial opportunities. Non-free content is not used in a manner that is likely to replace the original market role of the original copyrighted media.
830:
747:
is subject to one revert per person per 24 hours. I'll also remind you that the exception to 3RR for removal of Non free content applies only when that content is "
2564:
I don't entirely disagree with you, but I have been told by multiple editors during article peer reviews that the consensus is to use the html code for en dash.
440:
1497:
to file a motion instead of (or even in addition to) bumping the issue every day. I am not sure if this is the right avenue, but if it is not, you can visit
2765:
2215:
2082:
1877:
1788:
Making a situation right within Knowledge guidelines isn't an abuse of anything. If I have made mistakes in my use of a copyright image they have been in
1177:
1169:
1388:. Please review your AWB settings, before continuing work. If it's really not a bot, then pleace slow a bit down and actually check what you're doing. --
834:
1124:
players so all is correct,your ip adress will be sent to bhutan royal police and the king jigme wangchuk himself will put you in jail!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2755:
I'm not sure about the retroactive status of images under the Open Government Licence. What I do know is that images of these medals can be found at
2625:
2359:
2174:
has been substituted. I'm afraid I have been unable to tag the original for deletion properly through lack of understanding what I'm actually doing.
1009:
690:
with Arbcom. In the meantime I have made an RfC. I suggest you comply with ALL guidance provided for wiki users, not just the ones which suit you.
1804:
falls well within guidelines and the ultimate object is to create articles which are accurate, informative and which the worldwide public can enjoy.
2191:
Sorted out the deletion problem for the redundant image. It was as simple as me trying to use a Knowledge template instead of a Commons template.
164:
along the side. This is extremely promotional in nature and looks like your average auction house. There is nothing there that would make this meet
2657:
It's not just about that though. I had a list of things I was sorting out and wanted your feedback. I'm getting a little peeved at things like
2568:
seems to support this consensus. Do you know of any consensus that counters this, which I can refer to; or is this just your personal mission? --
1873:
402:
You could say the same thing about a lot of AfD's too. You dont just lump them together based on broad strokes. Each discussion is independent.
379:
This isnt a group nomination and thus shouldn't be grouped. You dont group all business articles that have notability issues into a single AfD.
2811:
how the images fail on either point at all when they are not placed randomly rather to illustrate and source specific points made in the text.
495:
234:
The sole reason I want to keep the images on the page is to keep the bots from tagging them for deletion. This is not an unreasonable thing. --
1331:
I know NFCC#9, but it doesn't forbid to leave links behind. Otherwise many pages are broken after your (unapproved) automated script passed.
2171:
1470:
keeps spamming images onto articles even after you have removed them for copyright reasons. Can you call him off on his Talk page? Thanks.
1352:
1792:. I stand by my earlier reasoning however that the term "minimal usage" is one which could be unfairly interpreted in the context of the
2338:
someone who wasnt born until 1906. Given those factors and that the cover listed isnt the first edition cover, its not out of copyright.
1761:
repeated violations of that will result in you being blocked. That has nothing to do with GOODFAITH, and your whole approach seems to be
1800:
1502:
1467:
2115:
I drew the central image of the UDR sign and created the rest using Photoshop. I may do the same again though to satisfy requirements.
2892:
1140:
2506:
Actually I didnt convert anything to hyphens. – (&ndash ;) and – are the exact same thing. just like &(& ;) and &
641:
If you continue to have serious doubts then I respectfully suggest you post an RfC. I cannot see your case proven until item #8 of
1540:
1232:
436:
359:
Its bad practice to refactor discussions, and these are not a grouped issue, thus discussions shouldnt be lumped together either.
1570:
Are you an administrator? If not, you don't have any authority to block me. I'm not doing anything that warrants a block anyway.
1432:
It was me who put the Ernst pic on Bloodnok's page, sorry about that I didn't know it wasn't allowed. Are any pictures allowed?
799:
is what I use to review how non-free files are being used. The correct action was taken by me in removing non-compliant files.
156:
Everyone has a POV. I took a look at the page, there are about 3 sentences referring to the painter, (none of which would meet
564:
was thinking why are the other pages not deleted. Leave it with me and I'll update here. Thanks again for the clarification.
846:
As I've pointed out to you before: following one set of guidelines alone is not acceptable. You must follow ALL guidelines.
2167:
2056:
1280:
the link. It's useless then. Please don't do it this way but try to keep the pages usable where you remove non-free images.
997:
2069:
1548:
197:
2411:
for the trouble you have taken to keep Knowledge proffesional and to a high standard. I look forward to hearing form you
1984:
I have always been willing to help resolve these issues. Glad to see you are willing to listen and resolve these issues.
879:
NFCC enforcement is exempt from editwarring policy. If you must drag this to arbcom go ahead, Ill leave it up to them to
583:
If you have continued objections to these images may I suggest you join the discussion at the talk page and tell us why:
2053:
but I doubt you where the one who took the picture, and if that is correct you cannot release it under a free license.
541:
You cannot, Knowledge is not a platform to promote your company. We actually react fairly negativity to such actions.
214:
Sorry about that, was just trying to clean up the page some. I saw it marked as approved and thought it was handled.
2334:
The book itself may be out of copyright but that particular cover looks like it was released in 1980's and it cites
1543:
yet. As you were the party who raised objections to the use of the files can you tell me if it is now ok to repost
2393:
Previous publication. Non-free content must have been published or publicly displayed outside Knowledge. Content.
2050:
1631:
1577:
1348:– a template specifically made to use non-free images without NFUR. Stop your script! It is doing harm to articles!
38:
2063:
2676:
2658:
659:
Actually you are forgetting the second part of #8, which none of these meet. If you think these pass NFCC file a
1544:
2324:
2278:
2022:
1807:
As before I will ask you: do you have a better solution to resolve this situation to everyone's satisfaction?
1087:
1045:
974:
937:
2122:
I will do as you say regarding the South Armagh image - tomorrow though, I'm about to pack in for the evening.
2032:
1917:
Please think about this again. I don't think this is much of an effort and I'd like to know your reasons for
521:
and shouldn't be editing anything related to your company. Your article doesn't meet our inclusion criteria.
2896:
1793:
573:
478:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Werieth reported by User:Evrik (Result: Both warned)
282:
Removing the images before the discussion is complete is outside of policy. You're just making things up. --
1853:
2773:
2711:
2666:
2614:
2368:
2243:
2223:
2196:
2179:
2157:
2136:
2008:
1974:
1835:
1812:
1748:
1711:
1660:
1556:
1475:
1240:
1136:
865:
785:
695:
650:
595:
2109:
How do you suggest I licence the Yellow Card image? I believe its use is very important in the article.
1626:
1572:
1506:
1132:
462:. Maybe you want to weigh in, as you have been active in reverting these editors as well. Thanks! --
2947:
but they will tell you the same thing, 12 non-free files showing the same person just isnt justified.
2906:
Contextual photos when free are fine, when they are non-free is when the issue arises. Take a look at
1799:
To overcome the copyright problems and to properly use military info boxes as they ought to be as per
1551:
given that the article text has been restored to a state where their original context is explained?
1128:
855:
Do the correct thing and revert yourself until such times as a decision is made after due discussion.
485:
2609:
Forgive me but I thought you would talkback to me. I'm now depending on your advice and guidance.
1510:
2971:
2933:
2823:
2422:
2335:
2320:
2274:
1929:
1789:
1736:
1437:
1393:
1360:
1305:
1289:
1013:
970:
933:
147:
106:
72:
2585:
2538:
2493:
2432:
We have a free image of her, making barrier for including additional non-free files even higher.
1966:
1525:
1117:
757:
Furthermore please bear in mind that all WP:TROUBLES articles are under probation and covered by
744:
732:
556:
499:
2986:
2952:
2916:
2859:
2838:
2769:
2726:
2707:
2685:
2662:
2634:
2610:
2555:
2511:
2453:
2364:
2343:
2296:
2239:
2219:
2192:
2175:
2153:
2132:
2092:
2043:
2004:
1989:
1970:
1945:
1831:
1808:
1770:
1744:
1725:
1707:
1693:
1675:
1656:
1614:
1600:
1552:
1471:
1452:
1375:
1322:
1236:
1200:
1158:
1098:
1077:
1067:
1049:
1036:
1017:
1005:
960:
894:
861:
804:
781:
713:
691:
668:
646:
618:
591:
546:
526:
407:
384:
364:
327:
300:
273:
249:
219:
173:
132:
123:
ANI report goes into some detail. Right now I am not seeing how this particular artist passes
91:
47:
17:
1703:
1670:
Ive nominated the file for deletion as being a copyright violation and factually incorrect.
1513:
1490:
1410:
1214:
1185:
507:
1028:
758:
481:
309:
While the burden might be as you say, preemptively removing the images is not policy. --
2967:
2963:
2944:
2929:
2887:
2883:
2875:
2871:
2850:
2819:
2804:
2800:
2565:
2473:
2445:
2441:
2437:
2418:
2289:
2073:
2036:
1925:
1762:
1592:
1433:
1389:
1356:
1315:
1301:
1285:
1273:
1251:
1150:
1091:
1001:
952:
883:
796:
705:
660:
642:
610:
606:
577:
514:
319:
292:
143:
102:
68:
2842:
2570:
2523:
2478:
2433:
1758:
1521:
1494:
1342:
948:
826:
818:
736:
518:
463:
204:
370:
They are grouped. Same issues. Same subject matter. You also removed my comments. --
2982:
2948:
2912:
2855:
2722:
2681:
2630:
2551:
2507:
2449:
2339:
2292:
2211:
2088:
2078:
1985:
1962:
1941:
1766:
1721:
1689:
1671:
1610:
1596:
1498:
1448:
1371:
1351:
Anyway you should create a bot account for automated edits and request approval on
1318:
1196:
1154:
1094:
1063:
1032:
956:
890:
822:
800:
709:
664:
614:
542:
522:
403:
380:
360:
323:
296:
269:
245:
215:
169:
165:
128:
116:
87:
83:
2882:
In brief then : You said the images were removed because they fail on both points
2444:. The usage of non-free media on wikipedia is extremely strict. With a free image
2027:
only consists of typefaces, individual words, slogans, or simple geometric shapes
1688:
is everyone's job. Displaying a known factually incorrect image shouldnt happen.
833:. If you fail to revert yourself I will be lodging a request for enforcement at
2907:
2834:
1685:
1405:
1210:
1181:
913:
762:
157:
124:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
817:
As has already been pointed out to you by Calil (a sysop) you are in breach of
2990:
2975:
2956:
2937:
2920:
2900:
2863:
2827:
2777:
2730:
2715:
2689:
2670:
2638:
2618:
2592:
2559:
2545:
2515:
2500:
2457:
2426:
2372:
2347:
2328:
2300:
2282:
2247:
2227:
2200:
2183:
2161:
2140:
2096:
2012:
1993:
1978:
1949:
1933:
1881:
1839:
1816:
1774:
1752:
1729:
1715:
1697:
1679:
1664:
1639:
1618:
1604:
1585:
1560:
1529:
1479:
1456:
1441:
1413:
1397:
1379:
1364:
1326:
1309:
1293:
1244:
1218:
1204:
1189:
1162:
1102:
1081:
1071:
1053:
1040:
1021:
978:
964:
941:
920:
898:
869:
808:
789:
769:
717:
699:
672:
654:
622:
599:
550:
530:
489:
466:
447:
444:
420:
417:
411:
397:
394:
388:
374:
371:
354:
351:
331:
313:
310:
304:
286:
283:
277:
262:
259:
258:
Do you really want to go down this road again? You are driving an edit war. --
253:
238:
235:
223:
208:
177:
151:
136:
110:
95:
86:
I am actually thinking of nominating this for deletion as lacking notability.
76:
2846:
2756:
2125:
I didn't restore the political poster but have advised the editor who did.
1272:
Take care when removing images. In the above example you "vandalized" the
1060:
To the uploader: Please add a detailed fair use rationale for each use....
1740:
1260:
I noticed you removing non-free files several times, now (and especially
609:) and the poster isn't mentioned in the text at all and thus cannot pass
200:
2981:
contextual relevance by itself isnt enough justification for an image.
2943:
They dont meet NFC if you think they do you can get a third opinion at
2436:
defines how we can use non-free media. Most of the files failed either
2396:
One-article minimum. Non-free content is used in at least one article.
2288:
I reverted it because of the file, not the external link. Please read
1854:
http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Painting_at_Kelaniya_Raja_Maha_Vihara.jpg
472:
Result of the edit-warring complaint about the Danish scouting society
2472:
and replaced several en dashes with hyphens. I'd ask that you review
2265:
Knowledge:GLAM/NHMandSM/NHM_Galleries/Treasures/The_Birds_of_America
1493:
have been ongoing for more than a few months, you may wish to visit
2029:
That image has full paragraphs of text which are fully copyrighted.
1595:
will result in you being blocked. There is no question about that.
1231:
I have made some progress and invite you to examine my comments at
198:
MediaWiki_talk:Spam-whitelist#Gymnastics_Examiner_still_not_working
1609:
If you add it again I will take this to ANI and have you blocked.
2962:
Thank you for providing me with the option of a third opinion at
2849:
had about 13 files and 12 of those where non-free. Please review
1076:
I have checked the page, and said line does not appear anywhere.(
1828:
Knowledge:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Ulster_Defence_Regiment
2066:
is fairly murky and I am unsure if it is under a free license.
1447:
Can I get some more details about what you are talking about?
25:
1334:
Your script (I don't assume you control your edits anymore?)
295:
the burden is on the person wanting to include the material.
1090:(since you linked it, you should at least read it) See also
160:) and a gallery of links to purchase paintings, and a large
2238:
Enquiries made re Basic Battle Skills. Awaiting response.
955:
I will only have two options, seek a block or a topic ban.
909:
I have left a note to SonofSetanta telling him to stop this
508:
http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_learning_management_systems
2081:
should probably be replaced with a better version of that
115:
From what I can see, hung-art.com is an auction site. Per
2131:
If there's anything else you want done just let me know.
2112:
Delete the UDR join form then, I withdraw my opposition.
932:
cause with this project. This will be your only warning.
1862:
File: Photograph of the wall painting at Kelaniya vihara
590:
In the interim you have been reverted - in good faith.
2469:
2170:
couldn't be overwritten, at least not with my skills.
1385:
1335:
1276:'s "Top 4" requests, by completely removing the images
910:
82:
Its not a BLP, and you dont use sources like ebay as a
65:
1512:
and contact a board member directly. You may contact
513:
You are using Knowledge to promote your company (See
2072:
needs removed due to not meeting the second part of
1969:
and in my own identity. Is this acceptable to you?
1720:
If you continue down that road you will be blocked.
244:
And Ill re-remove as there isnt consensus for them.
416:... and yet, we keep discussing the same issues. --
2833:Lets take a look at the three examples you quote:
460:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Billsilver1984
1031:for that article, and thus cannot be used there.
2021:Like I have said before PD-text doesnt apply to
1149:The files you are adding are not compliant with
755:in violation as the file is about recruitment).
613:, even if it was it would be mostly decorative.
1940:Unless you want to do the work please drop it.
831:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles
142:do not like when people behave destructively.--
350:What's wrong with grouping the discussions? --
64:I am not sure what spam are you talking about
2390:used for deliberate copyright infringement).
8:
2870:well as how they do not fail to meet points
2766:File:Conspicuous Gallantry Cross obverse.jpg
2216:File:Conspicuous Gallantry Cross obverse.jpg
2128:I will search for a better image of the CGC.
2083:File:Conspicuous Gallantry Cross obverse.jpg
560:just what it offers I would change my mind.
2407:TV, print (books and press) and web pages.
1541:Knowledge:Non-free_content_review#Proposals
1233:Knowledge:Non-free_content_review#Proposals
1178:Lyceum of the Philippines University-Cavite
1170:Lyceum of the Philippines University-Laguna
645:, which is the rule you used for removal.
2087:Those are my thoughts on the UDR article.
2035:Doesnt meet the requirements set forth by
1845:File:Painting at Kelaniya Raja Maha Vihara
1518:after you have exhausted all other options
835:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
663:, and get approval before re-adding them.
2757:http://www.defenceimagery.mod.uk/fotoweb/
2680:create the entire contents of the photo.
2626:File:Crest of the Royal Ulster Rifles.jpg
2360:File:Crest of the Royal Ulster Rifles.jpg
1010:File:Republic of Singapore Navy Crest.svg
2046:is a Derivative work, and possibly more.
1867:Waiting for your reply & thank you.
1491:WP:AN/RFC#Discussions_in_need_of_closure
1485:WP:AN/RFC#Discussions_in_need_of_closure
1227:UDR article and discussion of using NFC
441:Fællesrådet for Danmarks Drengespejdere
458:I just blocked two editors, and filed
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
2837:Only has 1 non-free image. Same with
2168:File:UDR_Soldiers_in_South_Armagh.jpg
2057:File:UDR_Soldiers_in_South_Armagh.jpg
1180:and putting a Non-Free Usage on that?
1048:is clearly stated on the file page. (
998:File:Singapore Armed Forces Crest.svg
7:
2172:File:UDR Soldiers - South Armagh.jpg
1549:thumb|150px|Original Anti-UDR poster
1539:No-one has replied to my request at
1353:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval
393:These are all common discussions. --
1906:just commenting out the file, e.g.
1801:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Infoboxes
1757:Reposting deleted content violates
1503:Category:Wikimedia Foundation staff
1384:You also removed a plain link from
1195:A rationale is all that is needed.
192:You archived an unprocessed request
2049:You might have the photograph for
24:
1489:If several of the discussions at
437:Knowledge:Non-free content review
1062:Something that hasnt been done.
991:
29:
1495:WP:A/R#Requests_for_arbitration
1153:, which is why I removed them.
435:Please top edit warring on the
1826:Your attention is directed to
1008:, following similar usage for
704:RfC is not the correct venue,
572:You removed three images from
1:
2070:File:UDR political poster.jpg
951:. If you continue to violate
2064:File:Basic Battle Skills.jpg
322:violations, not ignore them
2677:File:UDR Service Medals.JPG
2659:File:UDR Service Medals.JPG
2470:List of people from Chicago
3007:
2794:Madhubala images, response
2378:July 2013 Madhubala Images
2051:File:11 UDR March Past.jpg
1545:File:Bloodmoney Poster.jpg
506:any help you can provide.
2991:16:51, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
2976:16:06, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
2957:15:46, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
2938:15:26, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
2921:11:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
2901:09:59, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
2879:uploaded for Madhubala.
2864:18:23, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
2828:18:12, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
2778:13:31, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
2731:12:58, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
2716:12:45, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
2690:12:35, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
2671:13:59, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
2639:13:23, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
2619:07:27, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
2593:04:38, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
2560:13:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
2546:12:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
2516:05:23, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
2501:05:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
2458:15:14, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
2427:14:39, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
2373:10:30, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
2348:10:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
2329:10:01, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
2301:09:51, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
2283:09:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
2248:09:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
2228:09:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
2201:09:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
2184:17:40, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
2162:17:20, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
2141:17:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
2097:16:30, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
2013:16:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
1994:15:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
1979:15:40, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
1950:15:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
1934:15:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
1882:05:24, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
1840:13:19, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
1817:12:31, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
1775:12:05, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
1753:11:42, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
1730:17:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
1716:17:27, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
1698:17:19, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
1680:17:18, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
1665:17:08, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
1640:20:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
1619:20:22, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
1605:20:20, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
1586:20:18, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
1561:15:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
1530:15:39, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
1480:06:17, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
1457:15:28, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
1442:15:26, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
1414:17:04, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
1398:16:59, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
1380:16:55, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
1365:16:48, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
1327:16:43, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
1310:16:37, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
1294:15:23, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
1245:17:29, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
1219:15:13, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
1205:15:05, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
1190:14:55, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
77:04:19, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
2624:If you are referring to
2033:File:UDR Join 70 47r.jpg
2023:File:The Yellow Card.jpg
1902:Whats wrong with either
1505:. You may also contact
1264:). I have two requests:
1163:14:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
1103:15:20, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
1088:Template:Non-free symbol
1082:15:12, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
1072:15:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
1054:15:12, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
1046:Template:Non-free symbol
1041:15:11, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
1022:15:08, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
979:00:12, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
965:23:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
942:23:52, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
921:14:52, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
899:14:25, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
870:14:22, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
809:14:12, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
790:13:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
770:13:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
718:12:21, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
700:12:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
673:12:12, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
655:12:10, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
623:12:04, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
600:11:59, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
551:23:54, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
531:23:44, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
490:16:56, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
467:12:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
448:16:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
421:15:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
412:15:22, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
398:15:20, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
389:15:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
375:15:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
355:15:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
332:15:14, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
314:15:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
305:15:00, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
287:14:58, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
278:14:51, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
263:14:49, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
254:14:46, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
239:14:42, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
224:12:45, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
209:01:49, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
178:16:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
152:15:56, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
137:15:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
111:15:32, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
96:15:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
2042:At least the center of
1794:Ulster Defence Regiment
1591:Repeated violations of
1535:Ulster Defence Regiment
759:discretionary sanctions
574:Ulster Defence Regiment
568:Ulster Defence Regiment
537:also? Thanks for help.
517:). You have an obvious
2448:also comes into play.
2256:birds of america guide
2039:and should be removed.
1403:thought... Thank you.
1338:an image contained in
1250:Removal of images per
969:Go for it, tough guy.
795:Please review policy,
735:articles: reminder re
2464:Per your recent edits
2263:You reverted my edit
1006:non-free image policy
119:it shouldnt be used.
42:of past discussions.
2468:Recently you edited
519:Conflict of interest
318:Policy is to remove
2336:Roger Tory Peterson
1899:OK in my opinion!)
1014:File:RSAF Crest.svg
2062:The copyright for
1967:USER:The Thunderer
1822:Dispute resolution
1468:User:86.186.153.39
1336:just commented out
1118:File:Bhutan FA.png
162:Paintings for sale
2839:Katharine Hepburn
2579:
2532:
2487:
2044:File:UDR_Sign.jpg
1908:<!-- ] --: -->
1145:
1131:comment added by
443:pages. Thanks. --
291:You need to read
54:
53:
48:current talk page
18:User talk:Werieth
2998:
2591:
2588:
2582:
2580:
2577:
2544:
2541:
2535:
2533:
2530:
2499:
2496:
2490:
2488:
2485:
1921:doing this yet.
1909:
1638:
1636:
1629:
1628:EnglishEfternamn
1584:
1582:
1575:
1574:EnglishEfternamn
1412:
1408:
1347:
1341:
1144:
1125:
995:
994:
918:
888:
882:
767:
33:
32:
26:
3006:
3005:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2997:
2996:
2995:
2796:
2607:
2586:
2583:
2576:
2571:
2569:
2539:
2536:
2529:
2524:
2522:
2494:
2491:
2484:
2479:
2477:
2466:
2380:
2356:
2258:
2025:PD-text states
1958:
1907:
1889:
1847:
1824:
1652:
1635:
1632:
1627:
1625:
1581:
1578:
1573:
1571:
1568:
1537:
1487:
1465:
1430:
1406:
1404:
1345:
1339:
1255:
1229:
1173:
1126:
1121:
992:
989:
929:
914:
886:
880:
777:
763:
740:
570:
503:
496:Speedy deletion
474:
456:
232:
194:
84:reliable source
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3004:
3002:
2994:
2993:
2960:
2959:
2926:
2924:
2923:
2867:
2866:
2795:
2792:
2791:
2790:
2789:
2788:
2787:
2786:
2785:
2784:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2780:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2737:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2697:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2692:
2652:
2651:
2650:
2649:
2642:
2641:
2606:
2603:
2602:
2601:
2600:
2599:
2598:
2597:
2596:
2595:
2572:
2525:
2480:
2465:
2462:
2461:
2460:
2379:
2376:
2355:
2354:Help requested
2352:
2351:
2350:
2321:Mrjohncummings
2314:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2304:
2303:
2275:Mrjohncummings
2257:
2254:
2253:
2252:
2251:
2250:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2218:as suggested.
2214:replaced with
2206:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2165:
2164:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2129:
2126:
2123:
2120:
2116:
2113:
2110:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2099:
2076:
2067:
2060:
2054:
2047:
2040:
2030:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2015:
1997:
1996:
1957:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1915:
1914:
1911:
1888:
1887:Non-free files
1885:
1857:
1856:
1846:
1843:
1823:
1820:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1682:
1651:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1633:
1579:
1567:
1564:
1536:
1533:
1486:
1483:
1464:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1429:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1400:
1349:
1332:
1282:
1281:
1270:
1254:
1248:
1228:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1172:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1120:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1027:Its missing a
1004:complies with
1002:Singapore Army
988:
987:Singapore Army
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
971:GarnetAndBlack
947:Please review
934:GarnetAndBlack
928:
925:
924:
923:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
859:
858:
857:
856:
850:
849:
848:
847:
841:
840:
839:
838:
812:
811:
776:
773:
756:
753:unquestionably
749:unquestionably
739:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
636:
635:
634:
633:
626:
625:
569:
566:
554:
553:
534:
533:
502:
498:nomination of
493:
473:
470:
455:
452:
451:
450:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
368:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
231:
228:
227:
226:
193:
190:
189:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
181:
180:
125:our notability
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3003:
2992:
2988:
2984:
2980:
2979:
2978:
2977:
2973:
2969:
2965:
2958:
2954:
2950:
2946:
2942:
2941:
2940:
2939:
2935:
2931:
2922:
2918:
2914:
2909:
2905:
2904:
2903:
2902:
2898:
2894:
2889:
2885:
2880:
2877:
2873:
2865:
2861:
2857:
2852:
2848:
2844:
2843:Joan Crawford
2840:
2836:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2825:
2821:
2816:
2812:
2808:
2806:
2802:
2793:
2779:
2775:
2771:
2767:
2763:
2758:
2754:
2753:
2752:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2747:
2746:
2745:
2744:
2743:
2732:
2728:
2724:
2719:
2718:
2717:
2713:
2709:
2705:
2704:
2703:
2702:
2701:
2700:
2699:
2698:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2678:
2674:
2673:
2672:
2668:
2664:
2660:
2656:
2655:
2654:
2653:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2627:
2623:
2622:
2621:
2620:
2616:
2612:
2604:
2594:
2589:
2581:
2575:
2567:
2563:
2562:
2561:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2548:
2547:
2542:
2534:
2528:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2505:
2504:
2503:
2502:
2497:
2489:
2483:
2475:
2471:
2463:
2459:
2455:
2451:
2447:
2443:
2439:
2435:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2415:
2414:Kind Regards
2412:
2408:
2404:
2400:
2397:
2394:
2391:
2387:
2384:
2377:
2375:
2374:
2370:
2366:
2361:
2353:
2349:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2333:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2326:
2322:
2317:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2291:
2287:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2271:
2268:
2266:
2261:
2255:
2249:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2229:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2202:
2198:
2194:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2181:
2177:
2173:
2169:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2150:
2149:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2127:
2124:
2121:
2117:
2114:
2111:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2080:
2077:
2075:
2071:
2068:
2065:
2061:
2058:
2055:
2052:
2048:
2045:
2041:
2038:
2034:
2031:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2019:
2014:
2010:
2006:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1995:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1955:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1922:
1920:
1912:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1900:
1898:
1892:
1886:
1884:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1868:
1865:
1863:
1855:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1849:Hi Werieth ,
1844:
1842:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1821:
1819:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1805:
1802:
1797:
1795:
1791:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1649:
1641:
1637:
1630:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1583:
1576:
1565:
1563:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1534:
1532:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1484:
1482:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1463:Image spammer
1462:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1427:
1415:
1411:
1409:
1401:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1344:
1337:
1333:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1317:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1263:
1258:
1253:
1249:
1247:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1226:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1119:
1116:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
996:The usage of
986:
980:
976:
972:
968:
967:
966:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
945:
944:
943:
939:
935:
926:
922:
919:
917:
911:
908:
907:
900:
896:
892:
885:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
867:
863:
854:
853:
852:
851:
845:
844:
843:
842:
836:
832:
828:
824:
820:
816:
815:
814:
813:
810:
806:
802:
798:
794:
793:
792:
791:
787:
783:
774:
772:
771:
768:
766:
760:
754:
750:
746:
745:Troubles RfAr
738:
734:
731:
719:
715:
711:
707:
703:
702:
701:
697:
693:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
674:
670:
666:
662:
658:
657:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
639:
638:
637:
630:
629:
628:
627:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
604:
603:
602:
601:
597:
593:
588:
584:
581:
579:
575:
567:
565:
561:
558:
552:
548:
544:
540:
539:
538:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
511:
510:
509:
501:
497:
494:
492:
491:
487:
483:
479:
471:
469:
468:
465:
464:Dirk Beetstra
461:
453:
449:
446:
442:
438:
434:
422:
419:
415:
414:
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:
399:
396:
392:
391:
390:
386:
382:
378:
377:
376:
373:
369:
366:
362:
358:
357:
356:
353:
349:
348:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
315:
312:
308:
307:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
289:
288:
285:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
266:
265:
264:
261:
257:
256:
255:
251:
247:
243:
242:
241:
240:
237:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
212:
211:
210:
206:
202:
199:
191:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
154:
153:
149:
145:
140:
139:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
112:
108:
104:
99:
98:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
79:
78:
74:
70:
66:
59:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2961:
2925:
2893:92.21.202.99
2881:
2868:
2817:
2813:
2809:
2797:
2770:SonofSetanta
2761:
2708:SonofSetanta
2663:SonofSetanta
2611:SonofSetanta
2608:
2573:
2526:
2481:
2467:
2416:
2413:
2409:
2405:
2401:
2398:
2395:
2392:
2388:
2385:
2381:
2365:SonofSetanta
2357:
2318:
2315:
2272:
2269:
2262:
2259:
2240:SonofSetanta
2220:SonofSetanta
2212:File:CGC.jpg
2193:SonofSetanta
2176:SonofSetanta
2166:
2154:SonofSetanta
2133:SonofSetanta
2079:File:CGC.jpg
2026:
2005:SonofSetanta
1971:SonofSetanta
1963:USER:GDD1000
1959:
1956:Start again?
1923:
1918:
1916:
1901:
1896:
1893:
1891:Hi Werieth,
1890:
1872:
1869:
1866:
1861:
1858:
1848:
1832:SonofSetanta
1825:
1809:SonofSetanta
1806:
1798:
1790:WP:GOODFAITH
1787:
1745:SonofSetanta
1737:WP:GOODFAITH
1708:SonofSetanta
1657:SonofSetanta
1653:
1569:
1553:SonofSetanta
1538:
1517:
1488:
1472:Softlavender
1466:
1431:
1283:
1277:
1259:
1257:Hi Werieth,
1256:
1237:SonofSetanta
1230:
1174:
1133:Otisnaguzici
1127:— Preceding
1122:
1086:Please read
1059:
990:
930:
915:
862:SonofSetanta
860:
823:The Troubles
782:SonofSetanta
778:
775:Your reverts
764:
752:
748:
741:
692:SonofSetanta
647:SonofSetanta
592:SonofSetanta
589:
585:
582:
571:
562:
555:
535:
504:
475:
457:
233:
195:
161:
63:
55:
43:
37:
2908:Johnny Depp
2835:Bette Davis
2587:talk to me!
2540:talk to me!
2495:talk to me!
1924:Regards, --
1516:, but only
1514:Jimmy Wales
1507:Sue Gardner
1370:Mediawiki)
733:WP:TROUBLES
557:Newsjunky12
476:Please see
196:See here:
36:This is an
2876:WP:NFCC#8l
2818:Thank you
2119:regiments.
1284:Thanks, --
1092:WP:NFCC#10
482:EdJohnston
2968:Navsikand
2930:Navsikand
2888:WP:NFCC#8
2884:WP:NFCC#3
2872:WP:NFCC#3
2851:WP:NFCC#8
2847:Madhubala
2820:Navsikand
2805:WP:NFCC#8
2801:WP:NFCC#3
2446:WP:NFCC#1
2442:WP:NFCC#8
2438:WP:NFCC#3
2419:Navsikand
2358:Uploaded
2290:WP:NFCC#9
2074:WP:NFCC#8
1926:Patrick87
1870:Anuradha
1759:WP:CSD#G4
1704:WP:BATTLE
1684:Actually
1566:July 2013
1509:or visit
1434:Keith-264
1390:Patrick87
1357:Patrick87
1316:WP:NFCC#9
1302:Patrick87
1286:Patrick87
1252:WP:NFCC#9
1058:It says:
1029:rationale
611:WP:NFCC#8
607:WP:NFCC#3
578:WP:NFCC#8
500:Learnupon
144:Ymblanter
103:Ymblanter
69:Ymblanter
2762:aux fait
1741:Bullying
1522:Jax 0677
1428:Bloodnok
1141:contribs
1129:unsigned
60:Geza Pap
2983:Werieth
2964:WP:NFCR
2949:Werieth
2945:WP:NFCR
2913:Werieth
2856:Werieth
2723:Werieth
2682:Werieth
2631:Werieth
2578:kriegls
2566:WP:Dash
2552:Werieth
2531:kriegls
2508:Werieth
2486:kriegls
2474:WP:DASH
2450:Werieth
2340:Werieth
2316:Thanks
2293:Werieth
2270:Thanks
2152:book.
2089:Werieth
2037:WP:NFCC
1986:Werieth
1942:Werieth
1767:Werieth
1763:WP:GAME
1722:Werieth
1690:Werieth
1672:Werieth
1611:Werieth
1597:Werieth
1593:WP:NFCC
1449:Werieth
1372:Werieth
1319:Werieth
1274:WP:GL/I
1197:Werieth
1155:Werieth
1151:WP:NFCC
1095:Werieth
1064:Werieth
1033:Werieth
957:Werieth
953:WP:NFCC
891:Werieth
829:. See
801:Werieth
797:WP:NFCC
710:Werieth
706:WP:NFCR
665:Werieth
661:WP:NFCR
643:WP:NFCC
615:Werieth
543:Werieth
523:Werieth
515:WP:SPAM
404:Werieth
381:Werieth
361:Werieth
324:Werieth
320:WP:NFCC
297:Werieth
293:WP:NFCC
270:Werieth
246:Werieth
216:Werieth
170:Werieth
129:Werieth
101:then.--
88:Werieth
39:archive
2434:WP:NFC
1874:අනුරාධ
1624:about.
1547:&
1407:Begoon
1269:pages!
1211:Naraht
1209:Thanx!
1182:Naraht
949:WP:NPA
927:Notice
916:Cailil
827:WP:1RR
819:WP:1RR
765:Cailil
576:using
230:Images
2854:her.
2648:gold.
2310:wrong
1650:Badge
1634:*t/c*
1580:*t/c*
1499:WP:HD
889:you.
884:trout
445:evrik
418:evrik
395:evrik
372:evrik
352:evrik
311:evrik
284:evrik
260:evrik
236:evrik
166:WP:RS
117:WP:RS
16:<
2987:talk
2972:talk
2953:talk
2934:talk
2917:talk
2897:talk
2860:talk
2824:talk
2774:talk
2727:talk
2712:talk
2686:talk
2675:For
2667:talk
2635:talk
2615:talk
2556:talk
2512:talk
2454:talk
2423:talk
2417:Nav
2369:talk
2344:talk
2325:talk
2297:talk
2279:talk
2244:talk
2224:talk
2197:talk
2180:talk
2158:talk
2137:talk
2093:talk
2009:talk
1990:talk
1975:talk
1946:talk
1930:talk
1878:talk
1836:talk
1813:talk
1771:talk
1749:talk
1726:talk
1712:talk
1694:talk
1686:WP:V
1676:talk
1661:talk
1615:talk
1601:talk
1557:talk
1526:talk
1520:. --
1476:talk
1453:talk
1438:talk
1394:talk
1386:here
1376:talk
1361:talk
1355:. --
1343:GLNF
1323:talk
1306:talk
1290:talk
1262:here
1241:talk
1215:talk
1201:talk
1186:talk
1159:talk
1137:talk
1099:talk
1078:talk
1068:talk
1050:talk
1037:talk
1018:talk
1012:and
975:talk
961:talk
938:talk
895:talk
866:talk
805:talk
786:talk
714:talk
708:is.
696:talk
669:talk
651:talk
619:talk
596:talk
547:talk
527:talk
486:talk
439:and
408:talk
385:talk
365:talk
328:talk
301:talk
274:talk
250:talk
220:talk
205:talk
174:talk
158:WP:N
148:talk
133:talk
121:This
107:talk
92:talk
73:talk
2886:or
2874:or
2803:or
2440:or
2260:Hi
1919:not
1897:not
1501:or
1278:and
1000:on
737:1RR
454:SPI
201:TCO
2989:)
2974:)
2955:)
2936:)
2919:)
2899:)
2862:)
2841:.
2826:)
2776:)
2729:)
2714:)
2688:)
2669:)
2637:)
2617:)
2605:??
2558:)
2521:--
2514:)
2456:)
2425:)
2371:)
2346:)
2327:)
2319:--
2299:)
2281:)
2273:--
2246:)
2226:)
2199:)
2182:)
2160:)
2139:)
2095:)
2011:)
1992:)
1977:)
1965:,
1948:)
1932:)
1910:or
1880:)
1864:.
1838:)
1830:.
1815:)
1773:)
1765:.
1751:)
1743:.
1728:)
1714:)
1696:)
1678:)
1663:)
1617:)
1603:)
1559:)
1528:)
1478:)
1455:)
1440:)
1396:)
1378:)
1363:)
1346:}}
1340:{{
1325:)
1308:)
1300:--
1292:)
1243:)
1217:)
1203:)
1188:)
1161:)
1143:)
1139:•
1101:)
1080:)
1070:)
1052:)
1039:)
1020:)
977:)
963:)
940:)
897:)
887:}}
881:{{
868:)
825:-
807:)
788:)
716:)
698:)
671:)
653:)
621:)
598:)
549:)
529:)
488:)
410:)
387:)
330:)
303:)
276:)
252:)
222:)
207:)
176:)
168:.
150:)
135:)
109:)
94:)
75:)
2985:(
2970:(
2951:(
2932:(
2915:(
2895:(
2858:(
2822:(
2772:(
2725:(
2710:(
2684:(
2665:(
2633:(
2613:(
2590:)
2584:(
2574:D
2554:(
2543:)
2537:(
2527:D
2510:(
2498:)
2492:(
2482:D
2452:(
2421:(
2367:(
2342:(
2323:(
2295:(
2277:(
2242:(
2222:(
2195:(
2178:(
2156:(
2135:(
2091:(
2007:(
1988:(
1973:(
1944:(
1928:(
1876:(
1834:(
1811:(
1769:(
1747:(
1724:(
1710:(
1692:(
1674:(
1659:(
1613:(
1599:(
1555:(
1524:(
1474:(
1451:(
1436:(
1392:(
1374:(
1359:(
1321:(
1304:(
1288:(
1239:(
1213:(
1199:(
1184:(
1157:(
1135:(
1097:(
1066:(
1035:(
973:(
959:(
936:(
893:(
864:(
837:.
803:(
784:(
712:(
694:(
667:(
649:(
617:(
594:(
545:(
525:(
484:(
406:(
383:(
367:)
363:(
326:(
299:(
272:(
248:(
218:(
203:(
172:(
146:(
131:(
105:(
90:(
71:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.