User talk:Werieth/201311

2693:

cases problematic, I also know in non-first world countries governments have a tendency to block/filter those excessively. I also know that switching links to https by default can place extra stress on those websites, so its not something that should be done on the whim of a single wikipedia editor. Making a sound argument to switch to https can be done fairly easily, it can also be done fairly painlessly. However you need to understand that the wiki is extremely large and any migration done correctly will take time to phase out usage of the older style links. I think you need to step back get a cup of coffee (or what ever your preferred beverage is) and plan out an approach to this issue that works well, is non-disruptive to the community, and achieves the goals with as little pain as possible. Perhaps the first step is to find someone to write a lua module that converts any url which is on the list of https default friendly sites, from non secure to secure. Then perhaps roll that out to a limited number of citation templates. Once that phase is complete, slowly expand until all relevant templates use the http =: -->

1091:

acknowledged as much by admitting that the captions included critical commentary. Of course, the captions were zapped along with the image. So not only does the Bunuel article lose the image, it also loses the caption, both of which contain information content that has meaning and value. I could have started reverting your changes, but it's clear to me that you would simply have reinstated your deletions and we would have been off to the races to a 3RR situation. I had hoped we could achieve some sort of understanding on your talk page. Actually, the appropriate place for this discussion should be the article's talk page where it might attract the attention of others who are interested in the article, giving them a chance to weigh in on the issues involved. If I were now to revert your edit, what would you do next?

2275:

of which I agree with and endorse. If you read the article as is, there are nothing but facts about the company which gives is a strong NPOV. As more and more people contribute, the article with further flesh itself out. If you have issues with the article, please create productive edits and contribute rather than brashly tagging it with multiple unsupported tags. Every single one of the tags you posted has been discussed on the article talk page and rectified by myself as well as a Knowledge administrator (the same administrator who denied your speedy deletion request). The issues with the article have been confronted and have been discussed in detail on the talk page, if you would like to be a positive par of the discussion, please read and take part in that conversation.

2587:. The consensus of the discussion, nor have my closure have changed, simply the explanation has been extended to include the individual images discussed. I am notifying you because you rightfully should be made aware when anything is changed regarding to a discussion you participated in. No action is required. As I have stated many times before, if an uninvolved administrator finds fault with my closure, I am more than happy to reopen the discussion. If a situation of that nature should arise, I will once again notify all parties involved in the discussion. Thanks for your hard work and happy editing! -- 2641:

it to tools like AWB is the correct approach. Having a regular user mass change hundreds of thousands of links is plain disruptive. If there is a critical need for a migration from one protocol to another where it is a time sensitive issue (A site no longer supports non-https connections, or vice versa) a flagged bot is the correct method for doing that. It wont flood the recentchanges feed, that our anti-vandalism team work through, it wont flood watchlists, and it will give the community a good chance to analyze the changes, review the migration, the process and the procedures for doing so.

2479:, for example) when you're intending to start a discussion about them. Removing them means they're liable to be deleted because unused, and also means that people wanting to discuss them can't see the context in which they were used without going into the history. If you leave them in place until the discussion has closed, it means people can see what's being talked about, and the uploader/editor can rewrite the text or captions around the images to add critical commentary – or to clarify why they're important – if that's what's needed. Many thanks, 480:-- therefore, images from his films are of particular consequence to an understanding of the subject. Films are images. The image of a small child writing a sociopolitical message on a blackboard has meaning over and above any textual description of that image. Using screenshot images as part of an article about a filmmaker is just as meaningful, even essential, as using images of paintings is for an article about a painter. Also, again, the image was accompanied by a caption providing specific commentary from an RS. 2548:

didnt think the user was understanding what I was saying. So I filed an NFCR so that it could be repeated, in a probably different words, in a hope that the user would understand. I really dont appreciate the tone I am getting from you. I made a textbook removal of non-compliant files. The burden is on those wanting to include the media to prove that it meets policy, in this case that was far from being met. I am not going to leave obvious violations in place because someone disagrees with

894:. I have asked an admin to try and help explain it to you but they are not online at the moment. Critical commentary typically manifests in a paragraph or more of sourced text which not only focuses on the event in the image, but the image itself. The bar for usage of non-free media is high, in this case you are no where near meeting it. I zapped the files in the articles where you added them for the same reason, not meeting 1508: 3303: 2310: 1289: 2773:? The image is purportedly in the public domain, but I don't see any evidence that the copyright holder has released permission. It appears that that statement was added by the uploader. On Commons (where I have only the most limited experience) I would immediately nominate such a file for deletion, but I'm not too sure of the rules here. Thanks, 2678:. Wide-scale diffusion of HTTPS would at least put stones in eavesdroppers' paths. It doesn't make DPI etc. impossible, but at least more difficult. That, compared to the fact that is has practically no downside at all, leads me to the conclussion that it is one of the many weapons against mass-surveillance. -- 1936:

Taking a look from a different angle, NFCC just identifies the need for a rationale and that it has to include the article name for which it applies. It does not go into details of what constitutes a rationale, NFC does that. Meeting all 10 points in a rationale is not difficult nor recursive, if you

1169:

is to create free content, not just free to access, but with content under a free license. To my knowledge we are part of a very small group that wants to do both. Liberal usage of non-free media might be acceptable under fair use and employed by other encyclopedia's however that is not acceptable on

770:

That's your opinion, isn't it. As such, it is subject to discussion. The proper place for such a discussion is the talk page of the article. NVCC#8 states: "Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its

396:

and release the file under a free license. A caption or passing reference may be commentary on the image, but its no where near what is needed to meet the critical commentary needed to justify a non-free file. When I get back Ill do an image by image breakdown with details. But for now the files need

2909:

Dear Werieth, I really appreciate that you're contributing to keep the standards of Knowledge at the highest level possible. Yesterday, I have noticed that you deleted a couple of pictures uploaded by me - I agree that two of them may be disputable and deleted them, but especially the picture of the

2721:

I wasn't trying to get political here. Of course it's not Knowledge's business to fight mass surveillance, but apparently we do care about our readers' privacy. I am aware of the pit falls you mentioned, which is why I realized protocol-relative URIs would be best. If you are able to reach Knowledge

2694:

https module. Once thats done and there is a wider acceptance to https defaults file a request for those changes to be ingrated into AWB, and the rest of the links will slowly be converted. Dont approach the issue like all links need converted in the next 30 days or the world will end, because guess

2646:

On a side note, how much do you know about information technology? I would really like to know what your foundation is so that I can discuss/teach you about computer cryptography. From what Ive been assuming (and please dont take offense to this) you are in your late teens to early 20's with a basic

2640:

My main issue isnt that your changing them, but how your changing them, and your misconception of how http vs https work. Switching 80%+ of the links to what ever can easily be done via lua module code changes. For those cases that it doesnt catch and for a longer term cleanup/standardization adding

2547:

I dont mean to be rude, but you dont know what your doing and cant be bothered to do any research and I really dont feel like re-explaining the obvious repeatedly. I made 1 edit to the article removing the files, the images where never restored. The removals where questioned, I answered those, and I

2274:

This article has been made in a good faith effort to produce quality content for Knowledge. I am open for improvements making the article more encyclopedic and neutral...please help in this process. There are a handful of other editors who have added and deleted significant amounts of content, all

1761:

issue doesn't even approach such a thing. I cringe when I see this. Really I do. You're on a self-appointed mission, and if it's not as easy as you thought it was going to be - well maybe it's not supposed to be, because it's not so black and white as you imagined it was. Please get some perspective

1090:

And with that 1 edit, you summarily zapped multiple images each of which now, according to you, requires a separate NFCR. Your extremely minimal edit summary simply said "lacks critical commentary". As I've pointed out above, critical commentary is present for nearly all of the images. You have even

547:

Same issues as the previous file. Looks like an upside down picture of a rooster, something fairly easily described in plain text. Not critical to understanding who Bunuel was as it lacks any significance to who he is. (yes its a shot from one of his major pictures, but not actually anything major).

844:

the cover art is specifically discussed, using reliable third party sources. It typically refers to the contents of an image being directly discussed in the article in a significant manor. In this case other than the captions there isnt any critical commentary. In other cases where the image is the

814:

You still haven't provided a clear explanation of a WP policy or guideline that spells out exactly what "critical commentary" is and why your opinion is more valid than mine. It seems to me that you would be the appropriate person to file the WP:NFCR and that the images should remain in the article

2859:

Hello! You recently commented at my user page about some unlicensed media I'd included in an edit. I'm hoping that this means that you're a current moderator-type person. I have been unable to log into my wikipedia account for months, and I've been poking all around the website looking for help --

2692:

Knowledge isnt a tool for either support or a fight against mass surveillance. There are quite a few pit falls to https, they may not be a factor for you, but for a large percentage of our readers I know it can cause problems. I know quite a few corporate networks that make using https in a lot of

2669:

As far as my IT knowledge is concerned: I'm an economics post-graduate, yet I have a solid grasp on IT and the can's and cannot's of encryption. I know SSL/TLS has flaws, particular with the CA mess. I'm the last person to tell anyone that the little padlock in your browser means you're completely

2535:

The best thing is not to remove them, but just to post the NFCR discussion. Or perhaps remove them once, if you want to be BOLD and/or you think no one will mind, but if someone restores them, the removal is by definition contentious and has to be discussed. That used to be written down somewhere,

1756:

Here's another view from another "talk page stalker". It's free and unsolicited, and you can, thus, obviously, take, leave, ignore or delete it as you wish. Your manner when dealing with your fellow editors, regardless of rightness or wrongness, is atrocious. There is nothing so important that you

863:

You say, "In this case other than the captions there isnt any critical commentary." Why don't the captions count as "critical commentary"? The captions are part of the article, aren't they? It would be redundant to make a point in the article and then make the same point in the caption, wouldn't

411:

As I recall, the copyright holder did email WP about these images over a year ago. Isn't there some record of that? As to critical commentary, I look forward to a better understanding of "what is needed to meet the critical commentary needed to justify a non-free file", along with a reference to

1921:

from NFCC: paraphrasing slightly: "10. The media description page shall contain one rationale per article". Then NFC has, paraphrasing again "each rationale shall address points 1-10 of NFCC". Regardless of whether you consider it to be recursive, it is clear that others could find it confusing.

1574:

You dont give someone a uw template when they remove an image citing the non-free content policy. If you dont understand the reason for the removal you ask politely for further information. Under no circumstances should you revert them and give them a blanket uw template. Your recent actions show

2365:

Hi. You've tagged this image for deletion without notifying me. The discussion on Eleking was to merge the material into File:Miclas versus Eleking.jpg, which I have done, and updated the rationale to reflect this. I am not sure if I should simply delete the deletion template from File:Miclas

1188:

familiar with Knowledge image policy; probably more familiar with all but 10 or 20 other administrators. And I have been reading over the NFC policy, and I can't find anything to justify removing the images before the discussion has been taken up. It's possible I missed it; could you point me to

689:

The image expands upon points made in the article concerning the violent nature of the protagonists of the film and the caption contains a quote from a well-known film critic that bears directly on the image. It is far from decorative -- it is critical and it is commentary, making it definitely

1133:

How does this address the captions? The captions and the images go together. Not only does the image have information content, the caption also has information content. Together, the information content is mutually reinforcing. This is a very standard practice in other encyclopedias of repute.

2520:

In that case there was no way that the files would have been acceptable, I just filed the NFCR so others could repeat what I was saying to make the same points. If people want to review the article with the images in location we have the history there for them to review. Re-adding obviously

372:

As to critical commentary -- this was provided in the caption to the image: "The classroom scene from Las Hurdes: Tierra Sin Pan is an ironic statement of Buñuel's Marxist sympathies." This included a reference to an RS. Isn't this "critical commentary" bearing directly on the use of the

2722:

on HTTPS, you should be able to jump to Wayback on HTTPS, too. I do realize that HTTPS puts stress on websites, which is why I was exclusively refering to those that either require HTTPS by default (Facebook, Twitter, MySpace) or explicitely encourage their users to use HTTPS (YouTube,

1792:

Hey, do it your own way. I'm only commenting because I've seen it all before. You may or may not believe this, but I support 100% what you're doing. Unfortunately, I support roughly 0% of the way you are doing it, and I've seen how it ends. Always. Your time, your decision.

2809:. I did see that you had recently posted at the user's talkpage about another (perhaps similar?) picture, but only after I had already posted here to ask Werieth's advice; otherwise I'd have brought my question to you. I note that the image is declared to be sourced from 1192:

Regardless, if you are not able to point out to me precisely where you're justified in performing this action, then I will open an RFC and ask that something explicitly be put into policy or a guideline which should guide our actions. I am interpreting what appears to be

1575:

that you do not understand our non-free content policy. Reverting someone who is taking actions based on a policy that you dont understand is dangerous and can lead to you getting blocked in some cases. Also leaving the barely relevant templated messages is a bad idea.

1189:

where it is? As for the edit warring, I didn't mean just this instance, which wouldn't be a problem; I meant the pattern of behavior across several articles. However, if you can point me to something in policy that says I've misinterpreted it, then it's a moot point.

365:. I'm not sure I understand your viewpoint here. The Non-free content policy states: "Video screenshots: For critical commentary and discussion of the work in question. (i.e., films, television programs, and music videos)." I'd like to make the following points: 147:

from several articles. But I couldn't understand your rationale ("files are missing non free usage"). These articles are about TRT network and what's wrong using the TRT logo in a TRT article? If the logo can't be used even in a TRT article WP, why do we keep it ?

1777:

When I get treated like trash and get zero respect. I wont be roses and smiles. When someone comes to my talk page with a legit question I calmly explain the issues. In this case I was treated like a vandal, by someone who hasnt read the policy I cited.

1432:

overrides virtually all other policies and guidelines (yes, it's a bit unusual for a guideline - as opposed to a policy - to be able to do this). Therefore, I strongly suggest that, before making an edit, you first consider whether it is compliant with

3276:

Given there is so little context and it currently makes no sense to someone not familiar with the topic I think a redirect or deletion are the only options unless someone familiar with the topic steps up and significantly adds to the article

3404:

Uh, FURs mean nothing when referring to replicable non-free media. Anyone can take a picture of an engine, it may not be easy, but any mechanic can pull an engine and take a free photo. This is the second time you have failed to understand

867:

You're avoiding the main issue, though, which is that if you feel there's a problem with any of these images, your recourse should be to discuss the situation on the article's talk page and then, if you're not satisfied, for you to file an

960:

that each of the images is in violation of Knowledge norms (e.g., using non-free works in a gallery, using a non-free school logo decoratively for someone who attended that school, etc.). Having multiple non-free images in this case does

426:

I dont see any records on the file pages about an OTRS ticket. I am not a member so I cannot look up the case. but lets break this down one at a time. We already have one image of Bunuel which is free so additional images need justified.

1621:

Ah, but the reason that was given was supposed to be valid. Merely citing a policy without explaining how that policy actually applies does not qualify - otherwise, anyone could just cite a random policy and use that as valid reasoning.

1007:. In this case it clearly hasn't been done. My actions do go though the proper procedures, and escalate the case as needed. Normal procedure is to remove violations. As I have stated if someone wants to have my removals reviewed file a 864:

it? Are you saying that if the text of the caption was in the article, then the image would be OK? If so, then why was the image from "Los olvidados" deleted? The text of the article talks about the situation depicted in the image.

645:

The article discusses the "team" effort of the MOMA department -- a picture of the team is totally appropriate. Once again, this is a subjective situation that should be the occasion of a discussion, not unilateral action.

2831:

Given the possible can of worms that could be opening, I would suggest that you politely drop a note to the uploader, request that they send a release of permissions to OTRS, and avoid directly editing their own article.

2665:

I agree, there are easier ways to fix those links than AWB. The Lua module for all CS1-templates, and a clean and silent bot for the rest, would be perfect. However, I gave up on the idea that we'd ever find consensus on

1072:), where I removed the excessive files. I have provided detailed rationale for the removal, and explained how to proceed with a review of the removals, along with requesting further input from several users familiar with 3464:

Im not playing mall cop. Admins hold no special authority. Most of that article was pruned due to advert/copyright violation issues. We are not a venue for promoting that company, as an additional point the files failed

2248:

Honestly taking another look at the article, yes it may not be as visually appealing, but it doesnt actually degrade the quality of the article. I cant see any justification for further non-free imagery in that article.

1898:

The way you changed it, does constitute a change in policy, as #10 also has to do with copyright, sourcing, and the requirements that must be included in a rationale for it to be valid. Its not recursive, take a look at

2726:). I know we're not in a hurry here, but at times the decission-finding process on Knowledge is a pain in the ass. It bothers me that people immediately abused the Wayback discussion for a HTTPS-good-or-bad proxy war. 601:

Viewing the image gives a sense as to the nature of the film productions being discussed at that point of the article. In addition, the image includes text describing the nature of the work done at Filmofono studios.

2158:

a user concern. You have not responded to a single proposal regarding any wiki-side topic. Not one conversation. Still you have imposed your own ideas as "that is how it will be", irrespective of what I had written.

2788:

It looks like the uploader is the subject of the picture. The question is whether the image is really released into the public domain. (Yeah, I saw the image but wanted to wait for further activity before tagging.)

2370:

Ive gone ahead and removed the deletion notice, it is just a standard policy to delete non-free media thats not being used. Once its used again the deletion reason becomes invalid and the tag should be removed.

2385:

Great. I understand the policy and the reason for it, I just wasn't sure if removing the tag was enough, or if there was some separate nomination that would need closing somewhere. I appreciate the help.

771:

omission would be detrimental to that understanding." I believe a case can be made that these images do significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, which, again, in this case is a filmmaker.

3024:

Werieth, Heads up. I'll soon be sending you the restoration requests so that you can undelete and redo files for in the following articles once they make AfC and go into mainspace. Your future to do list:

2593: 2124:

Well, if you keep pushing your ideas as facts without proposing and discussing, and do not respond to my userside suggestions, I guess we cannot call this a cooperation. Just another one-way talking bot.

1411:

Note that it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created—see burden of

3568:

A logo of a perennial event (or of its sponsoring company), used to illustrate an article about a specific instance of that event. If each instance has its own logo, such specific logos remain acceptable

1701:

Actually he was, and he is looking at the same issue. I removed two files, you added a rationale to one of them, and added both back. The second file still violated policy, and was thus removed, citing

3044: 1863:

you excluded a few key rationale elements by removing point 10 (See 10c for example). Also the Per comment just sounds kludgely. Before making a change to policy please discuss it on the talk page.

845:

primary subject of the article (Book or album cover in the associated article, picture of a deceased person), and then only 1 file is permitted for basic visual identification. Another example is

2910:

Mannheim Palace before 1946 can not be considered as non-fair, since it is a historical photography that cannot be replicated - the Palace is not existing anymore in this condition. Thank you.

2452:

Personally I take the TOO fairly low, these where tagged as non-free and thus removed. If we want to debate the TOO on a particular file feel free to open a new section on that particular file.

1589:

The template states: "do not remove content or templates from pages on Knowledge without giving a valid reason for the removal". How is this not precisely what you did in that particular edit?

1738:'s that help explain things to users like yourself who fail to understand policy. The removal in all of those cases was for the same reason. If you cannot put two and two together you may have 2588: 2617:

I'm sorry the dispute got so heated between us lately. Even though I don't agree with you on the issue, I do respect your opinion. Thus my question: would you, too, oppose a switch from

3434:

Read the rationale. This is not an engine, it is a render of a design for an engine. The render model is MAHLE's, it is not available outside MAHLE for others to "take a picture of"

832:

places the burden on those wanting to use non-free media to establish that it meets policy. In this case you have utterly failed to do so. If you want the removals reviewed, file a

944:

Werieth, in the discussion which Jburlinson linked above, I informed you that your interpretation of how to handle non-compliant NFCC images is a poor one. The proper case is for

2583:

Per the request of an editor uninvolved with the discussion, I have expanded the explanation of the consensus in the discussion that I previously closed. The discussion is:

775: 2317:. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Knowledge with an 1951:

The nature of the problem is unclear wording—suggesting to look at it from a different angle doesn't solve the problem, it merely confirms it. Thanks for trying, though.

2102:

article. It was a seemingly insurmountable ordeal for me. I'm one of the main editors that has been most active with the expansion of Dahmer's article, so great work. --

3129:

Just because they are posted on a website doesnt mean that they do not have a copyright. I have removed the files from both articles. Copyrighted material falls under

562:

You say "but not actually anything major". That's one person's subjective opinion. As such, it should be the occasion for a discussion, not a peremptory deletion.

778:? In light of the outcome of that discussion, wouldn't it be appropriate to restore all the images and carry on this discussion on the talk page of the article? 1037:

case for removing a non-compliant image, which has an exemption, I consider this to be edit warring, and, for that matter, disruptive editing (as stated above).

447: 369:

Permission to use the file(s) in question was explicitly granted by the copyright holder, and this is explained in the summary for media data on the image file.

2584: 972:. Please don't make us go that route; just follow the normal procedure like everyone else does and tag non-compliant files as DFU and/or bring them to NFCR. 2740: 1720:

I'm obviously referring to the second of the three edits - specifically its edit summary. Where was this user invited into this conversation, by the way?

2806: 2229:

Hello. I noticed that the images (two which was uploaded by JMBZ-12) were deleted, which resulted in downgrading the article. If it did failed to meet

1309:. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out 620: 412:

MOS or other authoritative source that provides a clear definition of "critical commentary" that invalidates the example I provided above. Thanks.

902:, hopefully when they repeat the points Im making they are able to do it in a method that you understand, because you are not getting it right now. 462:#1, and the second clause of #8 because there is nothing visually unique or distinguishing about the image that requires it to be in the article.). 98: 454:

Other than the image caption there is no reference to the image in the associated text. It is easily described with plain text X character writing

1984:

WTH is wrong with you? all football clubs have their previous logos on their pages. This thing its very important. Dont vandalize that page more.

708: 344: 3029: 1392:, and I would strongly suggest making changes yourself instead of removing stuff in the future to avoid potential confrontations of this type. 2185:

article. Those are needed to illustrate the field of view scaling method so that other people know how they work on certain games like that.--

671:

Again almost identical issues was with the first three images. Zero ties to the article text, non-critical image, image is decorative. (Fails

540: 1844:—I have no idea what you're referring to. Perhaps also try to be a little more helpful (less terse) in your edit comments in future. Thanks. 1225:

the burden lies on those wanting to include the media. I have provided a detailed reasoning for why the files where removed. And I have said

180: 172: 164: 2871: 1212: 1048: 983: 872:. BTW, I notice you've also zapped the images from the articles for the various films. This is really a shame, especially in the case of 580: 340: 2969:) is already being used in association of the Kansas State Wildcat's Men's Basketball, therefore you should not be removing it. Thanks 2434: 2234: 1604: 1407: 1303: 995:

I am following standard practices. I am waiting on several others to help explain the point here. This is a case of clear violations of

1292:

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Knowledge is a

325: 1328: 281: 2003:

Usage of non-free media in that manor isnt allowed and was removed. Your response is a borderline personal attack so please review

664: 2985: 2926: 2822: 2778: 1884:

is recursive, thus meaningless, or at least down right confusing. Fixing the recursion does not constitute a change to policy.

317: 2039:

Exceptions should be very well-justified and alternate forms of presentation (including with fewer images) strongly considered

3354: 2200:

Given you have free examples in the section above, or can get screenshots from free games, using copyrighted images violates

361:

I notice you zapped images in the article on Luis Bunuel with the explanation that "file lacks critical commentary and fails

231: 1414:

I did fix the issue, I removed the file from an article where it lacked a rationale. Standard procedure in this situation.

392:

Im about to go away from the keyboard for a while. If you are in contact with the copyright holder request that they email

2043: 1512: 1455:

is a well established policy and DE under no circumstances overrides it. If you want to confirm that open a discussion at

1273:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

304:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2029: 3366: 3322: 2293:

Ill further comment on the talk page, but the admin in question is the one who added most of the tags you are removing.

2190: 2182: 1320: 1310: 846: 179:

when using non-free media specific criteria must be met, and in this case they were not being met. Taking a closer look

2321:. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the 3370: 1735: 1105:

You can file one request to review all the the usages at once. If you want the removals reviewed tag the article with

3114:

article can't have crests. I think crests are free contens. In Jeju United FC website, we can download crests freely.

3054: 3049: 3034: 2359: 3039: 2818: 2774: 1725: 1692: 1627: 1594: 1565: 1532: 1482: 1442: 1397: 1365: 1336: 1029:

that it ought not to be deleted. It is not that person's burden to prove the image needs to be kept in the article

968:

By continuing your current course of action of refusing to go through the proper channels, you are now engaging in

873: 2366:

versus Eleking.jpg or if some other procedure is appropriate. I'd appreciate your assistance with this. Thanks.

3376: 209: 202: 153: 2770: 776:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Werieth_reported_by_User:SlimVirgin_.28Result:_warned.29

3318: 2942:

and where removed. Knowledge's policy on non-free media is far more strict than that required by fair use law.

2622: 2430: 1206: 1109: 1042: 977: 168: 3525:

Your requset is reasonble. That's right. Jeju United and Bucheon SK are same club. Please join the discussion

2875: 2723: 840:

they need to stay out. Critical commentary is not a simple thing to define, If you take a look at the article

2238: 2233:, can you at least find other viable images for the article, so it won't have low quality for it? Thank you. 1229:

how to proceed with the case if the user wants to further challenge the removal, but they have yet to do so.

587:

Similar to the previous two, we dont need to know the set of a film to understand the person. Fails NFCC#1,8

377:

Finally, wouldn't it have been better to discuss this on the talk page rather than taking unilateral action?

31:

Should this file be deleted if it is a still frame used on Republic Records internet site when talking about

3205: 2505:

Okay, the best thing in future is to restore the images once the NFCR is posted so that people can see them

2186: 75:

Did you even bother to LOOK before you tagged it as an orphan, less than a MINUTE after I uploaded it ???

3448: 3393: 3362: 3334: 3310: 714: 243: 2817:, where it is apparently (to my inexpert eye) covered by a copyright statement at the foot of the page. 2509:, and so that the editor who wants to keep them can do some editing to make their significance clearer. 2326: 2283: 2265: 1721: 1688: 1623: 1590: 1561: 1528: 1478: 1438: 1393: 1361: 1332: 1374:

Actually it is. The burden is on those wanting to use the file to ensure that it complies with policy.

2647:

level of computer knowledge (what is often referred to as the 100 level courses in higher education).

2071:

and dont see anything. You cannot just claim that you are exempt from policy it doesnt work that way.

3199: 2973: 2914: 2867: 2332: 2107: 2098:

Just wanted to take a second to say you did an awesome job with the book citations/references on the

1922:

Maybe it should be points 1-9 & 10b or some such; if you can express it clearly, then please do.

1739: 1139: 1096: 934: 881: 820: 783: 695: 651: 607: 567: 523: 516: 485: 417: 382: 149: 69: 1687:

You weren't invited into this conversation - and in any case, you're not looking at the right edit.

3358: 3326: 2981: 2922: 2748: 2683: 2630: 2442: 2223: 1459:

you will find that removing fairly standard textbook violations is no where near qualifying as DE.

1202: 1059: 1038: 992: 973: 333: 3533: 3152: 3119: 2989: 2068: 1640: 1456: 257: 221: 110: 40: 3329:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

876:, since the images are essential for the reader's comprehension of the nature of Bunuel's film. 3574: 3552: 3504: 3474: 3459: 3444: 3418: 3389: 3282: 3267: 3252: 3241: 3227: 3166: 3138: 3080: 3006: 2947: 2891: 2886:

I cannot assist you in recovering access to an account if you failed to set an email address.

2837: 2700: 2652: 2557: 2526: 2496: 2457: 2405: 2376: 2345: 2340:

I was removing COI/promotional/unsourced material, and I did leave an edit summary. /facepalm

2322: 2318: 2298: 2254: 2208: 2145: 2076: 2012: 1942: 1908: 1868: 1783: 1747: 1711: 1678: 1658: 1612: 1580: 1551: 1524: 1516: 1464: 1419: 1379: 1351: 1324: 1316: 1234: 1175: 1156: 1124: 1081: 1016: 907: 854: 805: 758: 739: 680: 636: 592: 553: 507: 467: 432: 402: 288: 239: 188: 125: 80: 55: 17: 2325:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 1607:

when performing the removal. You may not understand the reason for removal but it was given.

3314: 2860:

but haven't found any. I'd love to touch base and get logged in again. Thanks for any help.

2796: 2391: 2314: 2279: 2164: 2130: 2033:

The use of non-free images arranged in a gallery or tabular format is usually unacceptable,

1956: 1927: 1889: 1849: 1800: 1769: 499: 32: 1011:. Until it is established that the files meet policy they need to stay out of the article. 3195: 3065: 2861: 2537: 2510: 2480: 2103: 1135: 1092: 930: 877: 816: 779: 729: 691: 647: 603: 563: 519: 481: 413: 378: 3547:

help me to understand why we can not have a logo of the league on a season page for this

1148:

Feel free to merge the captions into the article text. Example of whole article review:

965:

rise to that level, because it's not clear which images should stay and which should go.

3496: 3492: 3488: 3466: 3410: 3406: 3220: 3130: 3111: 3099: 2977: 2939: 2918: 2744: 2679: 2626: 2549: 2438: 2423: 2201: 2099: 1900: 1758: 1650: 1646: 1560:

In the edit in question, you did not state the specific criterion, hence this message.

1520: 1452: 1222: 1149: 1116: 1073: 1069: 1008: 1000: 996: 899: 891: 869: 833: 829: 797: 750: 718: 672: 628: 627:

We dont require a picture of the staff to know that he worked with those people, fails

459: 393: 312: 3469:, the article wasnt about the engine, it was about the company that makes the engine. 1859:

Your un-discussed change to policy changes a few key meanings. When you changed it to

849:

where that particular outfit had significant fallout and created her best known look.

3563: 3529: 3148: 3115: 2998: 2735: 2731: 2230: 2058: 2004: 2000: 1989: 1703: 1670: 1543: 1474: 1004: 895: 841: 837: 793: 722: 362: 253: 235: 217: 176: 171:. I havent removed Logotipo, which is from commons and labeled as free. I did remove 106: 36: 2491:

I wasnt planning on starting a NFCR when I removed them. I filed it after the fact.

1003:

the burden is on those wishing to include non-free media to establish that it meets

3570: 3548: 3500: 3484: 3470: 3414: 3278: 3263: 3248: 3223: 3162: 3134: 3076: 3002: 2943: 2887: 2833: 2696: 2648: 2553: 2522: 2492: 2453: 2401: 2372: 2341: 2329:. Thanks! Please work to contribute rather than do massive unsupported deltions. 2294: 2250: 2204: 2141: 2072: 2067:

Please point me to a discussion where this exception was given? Ive looked through

2008: 1938: 1904: 1864: 1779: 1743: 1707: 1674: 1654: 1649:

to be exact. Again when someone cites a policy, for performing an action dont be a

1608: 1576: 1547: 1460: 1434: 1429: 1415: 1389: 1375: 1347: 1230: 1171: 1152: 1120: 1077: 1064:

You really should review policy and remove yourself from my talk page. I have made

1012: 969: 949: 903: 850: 801: 754: 735: 676: 632: 588: 549: 503: 495: 463: 428: 398: 284: 234:

is the one in use. They are duplicates. Accordingly I've tagged it for deletion as

184: 121: 76: 51: 1507: 1428:

Unfortunately for you, the Knowledge community has decided in numerous cases that

494:

Your arguments dont hold any water, taking a look at two of the biggest producers

1511:

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Knowledge, as you did to

120:

Just cleaning up hidden HTML comments. A lot of articles have unneeded comments.

2805:

That's certainly how it would appear. There's some discussion of that aspect at

2791: 2730:

I'm contemplating the idea of starting a final, general debate on this topic at

2387: 2160: 2126: 1952: 1923: 1885: 1845: 1795: 1764: 2966: 3578: 3556: 3537: 3508: 3478: 3452: 3422: 3397: 3286: 3271: 3256: 3231: 3214: 3209: 3170: 3156: 3142: 3123: 3107: 3103: 3084: 3069: 3061: 3010: 2951: 2930: 2895: 2879: 2841: 2826: 2800: 2782: 2752: 2704: 2687: 2656: 2634: 2601: 2561: 2542: 2530: 2515: 2500: 2485: 2461: 2446: 2409: 2395: 2380: 2349: 2302: 2287: 2258: 2242: 2212: 2194: 2168: 2149: 2134: 2111: 2080: 2062: 2016: 1993: 1960: 1946: 1931: 1912: 1893: 1872: 1853: 1803: 1787: 1772: 1751: 1729: 1715: 1696: 1682: 1662: 1631: 1616: 1598: 1584: 1569: 1555: 1536: 1486: 1468: 1446: 1423: 1401: 1383: 1369: 1355: 1340: 1238: 1216: 1179: 1160: 1143: 1128: 1100: 1085: 1052: 1020: 987: 938: 911: 885: 858: 824: 809: 787: 762: 749:

In general we dont need 6 non-free files in an article with 8 free files. See

743: 699: 684: 655: 640: 611: 596: 571: 557: 527: 511: 489: 471: 436: 421: 406: 386: 261: 247: 225: 192: 157: 129: 114: 84: 59: 44: 3344:; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. 448:

File:Screen_capture_of_classroom_scene_from_Las_Hurdas,_Tierra_Sin_Pan.jpeg

2475:

Hi Werieth, please don't remove fair-use images from articles (as you did

2053:

You better dont touch articles about football if have no idea about this.

1757:

need to be as rude as you are to good-faith contributors, and a debatable

3357:

to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents

2140:

Ive only made a few concrete statements the rest are ideas and thoughts.

2054: 1985: 1197:

in policy, and has been a long-standing tradition, but it seems it's not

213: 3147:

Can you explain how to use crests on jeju united fc article of wikipeda?

2309: 1673:, where all you need to do is to read the first sentence on the page. -- 1166: 1025:

Incorrect: it is the burden of proof to the person who wants it kept to

999:. I have notified the user if they want the removals reviewed to file a 3526: 3342:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made

948:(not the uploader) to take the issue to NFCR or to tag the files as {{ 2670:

safe from any type of eavesdropping. Of course you're not. However,

1076:

to assist in explaining why these are no where near meeting policy.

3175:

Please explain in detail. Who use theses crests on Jeju United FC?

212:

as an orphan. Unfortunately, it is not. It is used in the article

1878:

10 ... media description page contains ... non-free use rationale

1519:. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been 800:

but until that closes the files need to stay out of the article.

3075:

When those articles get to mainspace feel free to restore them.

2154:

What you do within the bot is yours, except that the parameters

1296:, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the 1293: 621:

File:Photo_of_the_staff_of_the_MOMA_film_department,_c._1940.jpg

1882:

A non-free rationale ... needs to clearly address all 10 points

1734:

I have a fairly open policy on my talk page and I have several

3353:

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's

3045:

User:Crtew/List of journalists killed by Boko Haram in Nigeria

2026: 1406:

You dont understand the policy I cited, please take a look at

717:

we can provide a link to it so they can see the poster. Fails

3001:#14 usage of non-free logos on yearly articles isnt allowed. 792:

Actually none of those files currently come close to meeting

3527:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Jeju_United_FC#Merger_proposal

3301: 2811: 713:

Again just decorative usage as the film has its own article

101:

page, many thanks. Just curious, what's wrong with the line

3369:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary 1653:

and revert because you dont understand what you are doing.

2424:

WP:NFCR#List of shopping mall retailers in the Philippines

1645:

It was, I just didnt cite the exact subsection of policy,

3030:

User:Crtew/Disappearance and displacement of Mario Segura

2807:

Knowledge:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Justin Nickels

3133:, the files that where removed do not meet that policy. 2585:

Knowledge:Non-free content review/Archive 37#Luis Buñuel

1527:

if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

541:

File:Screen_capture_from_Las_Hurdas,_Tierra_Sin_Pan.jpeg

50:

Unless its the cover to the single it shouldnt be used.

3382: 3247:

I removed your speedy tag. This is a statistics stub.

3191: 2476: 2400:

Nope, just some house cleaning is all that was needed.

1841: 1515:, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the 476:

Let's not forget that the subject of this article is a

352: 321: 1346:

What? I did fix the issue, by removing the violation.

181:

File:Turkish Radio and Television Corporation logo.png

173:

File:Turkish Radio and Television Corporation logo.png

165:

File:Turkish Radio and Television Corporation logo.png

3443:...And don't play mall cop. You're not an admin yet. 3361:

among editors. You can post a request for help at an

836:

until the files have been established that they meet

502:

there is a total of 1 non-free file between the two.

581:

File:Screencap_of_film_produced_by_Filmofono_S.A.jpg

1903:it should help clarify exactly what is being said. 3348:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. 2967:https://en.wikipedia.org/File:KSUWildcats_logo.svg 956:removing any images from the article unless it is 282:Knowledge:Non-free_content_review#Luis_Bu.C3.B1uel 1546:. I removed the file for clearly failing policy. 2035:but should be considered on a case-by-case basis 1937:want to make a change take it to the talk page. 1542:Please stop, you are obviously dont understand 1473:You're the one who's "plain wrong" - read some 1408:Knowledge:Non-free content criteria#Enforcement 278: 183:should probably be replaced and then deleted. 3495:, and there is no evidence that they satisfy 1388:Actually, it's pretty much the definition of 8: 458:on a chalk board. (This would mean it fails 2429:You closed the section as resolved. How is 2335:comment added 16:45, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 796:. If you want the removals reviewed file a 103: 3313:according to the reverts you have made on 1302:The Knowledge community encourages you to 774:Didn't all this get covered a week ago at 665:File:Screen_capture_from_Los_olvidados.jpg 175:which is tagged as non-free. According to 3309:You currently appear to be engaged in an 2181:Hi, please do not remove images from the 238:. We will of course keep the needed one. 3432:"Anyone can take a picture of an engine" 2769:Hi, Werieth! Could I ask your advice on 2695:what? the world will keep on rotating. 2521:non-compliant files is a waste of time. 99:Beijing International Studies University 3190:How would I get documented evidence of 2961:Kansas State Wildcat's Men's Basketball 2433:copyrightable in the Philippines? Also 815:during the duration of any discussion. 3413:I will be forced to seek a topic ban. 2938:The files in question failed to meet 1201:stated anywhere, which is a problem. 847:...Baby_One_More_Time_(song)#Synopsis 7: 3373:. If you engage in an edit war, you 1603:I cited our non-free content policy 1360:That's not fixing the issue at all. 298:The following discussion is closed. 3483:I have tagged the whole set with {{ 2435:File:Logo of Ever Gotesco Malls.jpg 1605:Knowledge:Non-free content criteria 1321:New contributors are always welcome 1033:the removal. Because this is not a 3335:Knowledge's policy on edit warring 1762:and show some respect for others. 1329:many reasons why you might want to 24: 2471:Removing images before discussion 1319:to try out your editing skills. 1267:The discussion above is closed. 898:. Leave the files out and file a 709:File:Le_Fantôme_de_la_liberté.jpg 3387:Please refer to the updated FURs 2960: 2308: 1506: 1287: 1027:prove in the deletion discussion 1119:with the title of the article. 291:) 18:12, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 3333:Please be particularly aware, 3321:with others, to avoid editing 3212:}}) while signing a reply, thx 3055:User:Crtew/HornAfrik Media Inc 3050:User:Crtew/Alberto López Bello 3035:User:Crtew/Ahmed Ismail Hassan 2360:File:Miclas versus Eleking.jpg 1068:edit to the page in question ( 890:You obviously dont understand 456:Respect the property of others 232:File:Li Chang (politician).jpg 27:File:TNAF Hearts Like Ours.jpg 1: 3579:15:03, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 3557:14:39, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 3538:12:16, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 3509:21:18, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 3479:21:17, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 3453:21:13, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 3423:21:10, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 3409:. If you continue to violate 3398:21:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 3287:17:48, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 3272:17:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 3257:17:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 3232:15:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 3215:10:59, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 3171:04:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 3157:04:02, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 3143:16:17, 21 November 2013 (UTC) 3124:16:12, 21 November 2013 (UTC) 3085:13:19, 21 November 2013 (UTC) 3070:05:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC) 3040:User:Crtew/Christopher Guarin 3011:22:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC) 2990:22:41, 20 November 2013 (UTC) 2952:13:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC) 2931:08:34, 20 November 2013 (UTC) 2896:13:19, 21 November 2013 (UTC) 2880:02:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC) 2842:19:10, 18 November 2013 (UTC) 2827:19:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC) 2801:18:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC) 2783:18:38, 18 November 2013 (UTC) 2753:16:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 2705:16:30, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 2688:16:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 2657:16:00, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 2635:15:44, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 2602:03:20, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 2562:03:43, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 2543:03:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 2536:though I have no idea where. 2531:02:35, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 2516:02:16, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 2501:02:05, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 2486:01:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 2462:16:17, 15 November 2013 (UTC) 2447:16:14, 15 November 2013 (UTC) 2410:18:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC) 2396:18:50, 15 November 2013 (UTC) 2381:11:49, 15 November 2013 (UTC) 2350:16:48, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 2303:15:45, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 2288:15:40, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 2259:23:02, 11 November 2013 (UTC) 2243:22:26, 11 November 2013 (UTC) 2213:18:28, 11 November 2013 (UTC) 2195:17:14, 11 November 2013 (UTC) 1917:The first statement I quoted 1513:Disney Junior (French Canada) 3262:Should we just redirect it? 3110:article can have crests but 2183:Field_of_view_in_video_games 2169:07:53, 8 November 2013 (UTC) 2150:21:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC) 2135:21:52, 7 November 2013 (UTC) 2112:00:13, 7 November 2013 (UTC) 2081:17:59, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 2063:17:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 2021:Look baby, must I teach you: 2017:17:48, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 2001:Our policy on non-free media 1994:17:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 1961:14:01, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 1947:13:16, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 1932:12:53, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 1913:12:18, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 1894:12:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 1873:11:46, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 1854:11:40, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 1804:23:36, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1788:23:30, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1773:23:19, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1752:23:10, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1730:23:05, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1716:23:02, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1697:23:00, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1683:22:55, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1663:22:57, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1632:22:50, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1617:22:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1599:22:44, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1585:22:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1570:22:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1556:20:45, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1537:20:43, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1487:23:03, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1469:22:53, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1447:22:48, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1424:22:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1402:22:38, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1384:20:45, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1370:20:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1356:20:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1341:20:40, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1239:18:00, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 1221:See the enforcement part of 1217:17:50, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 1180:17:36, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 1161:17:33, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 1144:17:31, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 1129:17:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 1101:17:15, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 1086:15:53, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 1053:15:46, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 1021:15:25, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 988:15:15, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 939:04:25, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 912:02:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 886:02:45, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 859:01:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 825:01:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 810:00:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 788:23:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 763:22:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 744:22:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 700:23:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 685:22:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 656:23:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 641:22:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 612:23:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 597:22:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 572:23:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 558:22:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 528:04:40, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 512:00:31, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 490:23:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 472:22:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 437:22:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 422:21:17, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 407:21:03, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 397:to stay out of the article. 387:20:56, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 262:11:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 248:10:10, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 226:09:37, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 193:10:19, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 158:08:49, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 130:10:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 115:04:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 85:20:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC) 60:17:51, 29 October 2013 (UTC) 45:17:44, 29 October 2013 (UTC) 1736:Knowledge:Talk page stalker 203:File:Li Chang 1914-2010.jpg 3595: 3543:logo of MLL on season page 2771:File:Justin M. Nickels.jpg 2765:File:Justin M. Nickels.jpg 2674:encryption is better than 874:Las Hurdes: Tierra Sin Pan 163:There are two files here, 2431:File:Ayala Malls Logo.jpg 1523:. Please make use of the 1323:. You don't even need to 280:I've moved the review to 3327:try to reach a consensus 3317:. Users are expected to 1270:Please do not modify it. 1115:, and open a section on 301:Please do not modify it. 208:Just noticed you tagged 169:File:Logotipo de TRT.jpg 145:File:Logotipo de TRT.jpg 97:For your editing to the 3363:appropriate noticeboard 3106:are same club. But Why 3098:Hi, I have a question. 1150:Knowledge:NFCR#Tweenies 690:"critical commentary." 252:You are right. My bad. 3306: 2623:protocol relative URIs 1842:your edit comment here 715:The Phantom of Liberty 293: 3305: 3094:Jeju United FC crests 2819:Justlettersandnumbers 2775:Justlettersandnumbers 2625:, or is that okay? -- 2266:Texas Precious Metals 1451:You are plain wrong. 929:Which admin is that? 143:Hi, you have removed 2222:Images removed from 1327:(although there are 721:#1,3,8 and see also 70:Land of the Pharaohs 2965:Wereith this logo ( 2224:MotorStorm (series) 1669:The user linked to 548:Fails, #1,8 again. 3367:dispute resolution 3307: 2187:HappyLogolover2011 1312:how to edit a page 970:disruptive editing 216:since 28 October. 3491:, they also fail 3242:Order of a kernel 3213: 2993: 2976:comment added by 2934: 2917:comment added by 2870:comment added by 2541: 2514: 2484: 2048: 2047: 1644: 1307:in updating pages 1211: 1047: 982: 734: 18:User talk:Werieth 3586: 3463: 3315:MAHLE_Powertrain 3304: 3203: 2992: 2970: 2933: 2911: 2882: 2816: 2724:Internet Archive 2620: 2597: 2540: 2513: 2483: 2336: 2312: 2027: 1836:Non-free content 1802: 1798: 1771: 1767: 1722:Dogmaticeclectic 1689:Dogmaticeclectic 1638: 1624:Dogmaticeclectic 1591:Dogmaticeclectic 1562:Dogmaticeclectic 1529:Dogmaticeclectic 1510: 1479:Dogmaticeclectic 1439:Dogmaticeclectic 1394:Dogmaticeclectic 1362:Dogmaticeclectic 1333:Dogmaticeclectic 1300:link at the top. 1291: 1290: 1272: 1209: 1114: 1108: 1063: 1045: 980: 733: 726: 500:Steven Spielberg 357: 348: 329: 303: 33:Hearts Like Ours 3594: 3593: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3545: 3523: 3487:}}. Apart from 3457: 3439: 3371:page protection 3302: 3300: 3245: 3188: 3096: 3022: 2971: 2963: 2912: 2907: 2865: 2862:user:PurpleChez 2857: 2813: 2810: 2767: 2618: 2612: 2610:Regarding HTTPS 2595: 2581: 2473: 2427: 2363: 2330: 2269: 2227: 2179: 2122: 2096: 1982: 1840:Please explain 1838: 1796: 1794: 1765: 1763: 1288: 1285: 1277: 1268: 1184:@Werieth, I am 1112: 1110:non-free review 1106: 1057: 727: 338: 315: 311: 299: 294: 275: 206: 141: 95: 73: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3592: 3590: 3582: 3581: 3544: 3541: 3522: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3441: 3435: 3426: 3425: 3351: 3350: 3345: 3330: 3299: 3296: 3294: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3244: 3239: 3237: 3235: 3234: 3187: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3112:Jeju United FC 3100:Jeju United FC 3095: 3092: 3090: 3088: 3087: 3058: 3057: 3052: 3047: 3042: 3037: 3032: 3021: 3018: 3016: 3014: 3013: 2962: 2959: 2957: 2955: 2954: 2906: 2903: 2901: 2899: 2898: 2872:108.15.252.118 2856: 2853: 2851: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2766: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2727: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2667: 2660: 2659: 2643: 2642: 2611: 2608: 2606: 2580: 2577: 2575: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2472: 2469: 2467: 2465: 2464: 2426: 2421: 2419: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2362: 2357: 2355: 2353: 2352: 2306: 2305: 2268: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2226: 2220: 2218: 2216: 2215: 2178: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2121: 2118: 2116: 2100:Jeffrey Dahmer 2095: 2092: 2090: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2046: 2045: 2042: 2031: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 1999:Please review 1981: 1978: 1976: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1837: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1301: 1298:edit this page 1284: 1281: 1279: 1276: 1275: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1227:multiple times 1203:Magog the Ogre 1190: 1060:Magog the Ogre 1039:Magog the Ogre 993:Magog the Ogre 974:Magog the Ogre 966: 927: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 865: 772: 747: 746: 711: 705: 704: 703: 702: 668: 667: 661: 660: 659: 658: 624: 623: 617: 616: 615: 614: 584: 583: 577: 576: 575: 574: 544: 543: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 451: 450: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 375: 374: 370: 359: 358: 308: 307: 306: 277: 276: 274: 271: 269: 267: 266: 265: 264: 205: 200: 198: 196: 195: 140: 137: 135: 133: 132: 94: 91: 89: 72: 67: 65: 63: 62: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3591: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3569: 3565: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3542: 3540: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3528: 3520: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3498: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3461: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3433: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3427: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3380: 3379:from editing. 3378: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3356: 3349: 3346: 3343: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3336: 3331: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3298:November 2013 3297: 3295: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3269: 3265: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3243: 3240: 3238: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3222: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3211: 3207: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3185: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3093: 3091: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3056: 3053: 3051: 3048: 3046: 3043: 3041: 3038: 3036: 3033: 3031: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3019: 3017: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2968: 2958: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2904: 2902: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2869: 2863: 2854: 2852: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2815: 2812:justinnickels 2808: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2793: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2764: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2739: 2737: 2733: 2728: 2725: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2668: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2645: 2644: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2615: 2609: 2607: 2604: 2603: 2599: 2598: 2592: 2591: 2586: 2578: 2576: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2539: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2482: 2478: 2470: 2468: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2425: 2422: 2420: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2361: 2358: 2356: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2334: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2311: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2276: 2272: 2267: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2235:70.45.128.103 2232: 2225: 2221: 2219: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2203: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2176: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2157: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2119: 2117: 2114: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2093: 2091: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1979: 1977: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1920: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1861:points 1–9 of 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1835: 1805: 1801: 1799: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1770: 1768: 1760: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1740:WP:COMPETENCE 1737: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1642: 1641:edit conflict 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1509: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1431: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1315:, or use the 1314: 1313: 1308: 1306: 1299: 1295: 1282: 1280: 1274: 1271: 1265: 1264: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1214: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1168: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1151: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1111: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1061: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1050: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 991: 990: 989: 985: 979: 975: 971: 967: 964: 959: 958:crystal clear 955: 951: 947: 943: 942: 941: 940: 936: 932: 913: 909: 905: 901: 897: 893: 889: 888: 887: 883: 879: 875: 871: 866: 862: 861: 860: 856: 852: 848: 843: 842:Virgin Killer 839: 835: 831: 828: 827: 826: 822: 818: 813: 812: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 791: 790: 789: 785: 781: 777: 773: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 760: 756: 752: 745: 741: 737: 731: 724: 720: 716: 712: 710: 707: 706: 701: 697: 693: 688: 687: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 669: 666: 663: 662: 657: 653: 649: 644: 643: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 625: 622: 619: 618: 613: 609: 605: 600: 599: 598: 594: 590: 586: 585: 582: 579: 578: 573: 569: 565: 561: 560: 559: 555: 551: 546: 545: 542: 539: 538: 529: 525: 521: 518: 517:WP:OTHERSTUFF 515: 514: 513: 509: 505: 501: 497: 493: 492: 491: 487: 483: 479: 475: 474: 473: 469: 465: 461: 457: 453: 452: 449: 446: 445: 438: 434: 430: 425: 424: 423: 419: 415: 410: 409: 408: 404: 400: 395: 391: 390: 389: 388: 384: 380: 371: 368: 367: 366: 364: 356: 355: 351: 346: 342: 337: 336: 332: 327: 323: 319: 314: 310: 309: 305: 302: 296: 295: 292: 290: 286: 283: 273:Bunuel images 272: 270: 263: 259: 255: 251: 250: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 230: 229: 228: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 204: 201: 199: 194: 190: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 166: 162: 161: 160: 159: 155: 151: 146: 138: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 118: 117: 116: 112: 108: 104: 100: 92: 90: 87: 86: 82: 78: 71: 68: 66: 61: 57: 53: 49: 48: 47: 46: 42: 38: 34: 26: 19: 3567: 3546: 3524: 3460:Andy Dingley 3445:Andy Dingley 3436: 3431: 3390:Andy Dingley 3388: 3386: 3381: 3374: 3352: 3347: 3341: 3332: 3323:disruptively 3308: 3293: 3246: 3236: 3189: 3097: 3089: 3059: 3023: 3015: 2972:— Preceding 2964: 2956: 2913:— Preceding 2908: 2900: 2866:— Preceding 2858: 2850: 2790: 2768: 2738:. Good idea? 2729: 2675: 2671: 2616: 2613: 2605: 2594: 2589: 2582: 2574: 2506: 2474: 2466: 2428: 2418: 2364: 2354: 2327:my talk page 2319:edit summary 2307: 2277: 2273: 2270: 2228: 2217: 2180: 2155: 2123: 2115: 2097: 2089: 2038: 2034: 1983: 1975: 1918: 1881: 1877: 1860: 1839: 1517:edit summary 1505: 1410: 1311: 1304: 1297: 1286: 1283:October 2013 1278: 1269: 1266: 1226: 1198: 1194: 1185: 1165:Knowledge's 1065: 1034: 1030: 1026: 962: 957: 953: 945: 928: 748: 496:J. J. Abrams 477: 455: 376: 360: 353: 349: 335:Article talk 334: 330: 300: 297: 279: 268: 240:Andy Dingley 207: 197: 150:Nedim Ardoğa 144: 142: 134: 102: 96: 88: 74: 64: 30: 3521:Jeju United 3319:collaborate 3208:me (i.e. {{ 3186:Hello there 2997:Please see 2579:Luis Buñuel 2331:—Preceding 2315:Chriskaspar 2313:Hello, I'm 2280:Chriskaspar 2278:Thank you, 2120:Another way 2094:Compliments 1647:WP:NFCC#10c 1170:wikipedia. 1070:Luis Buñuel 322:visual edit 313:Luis Buñuel 3564:WP:NFC#UUI 3499:either. -- 3196:Biosthmors 3194:? Thanks. 3192:permission 3161:You cant. 3108:Bucheon SK 3104:Bucheon SK 2999:WP:NFC#UUI 2864:11/18/13 2538:SlimVirgin 2511:SlimVirgin 2481:SlimVirgin 2177:FOV images 2104:DendroNaja 1477:archives. 1199:explicitly 1136:Jburlinson 1093:Jburlinson 931:Jburlinson 878:Jburlinson 817:Jburlinson 780:Jburlinson 730:Jburlinson 723:WP:NFC#UUI 692:Jburlinson 648:Jburlinson 604:Jburlinson 564:Jburlinson 520:Jburlinson 482:Jburlinson 414:Jburlinson 379:Jburlinson 210:this photo 3497:WP:NFCC#4 3493:WP:NFCC#8 3489:WP:NFCC#1 3485:subst:rfu 3467:WP:NFCC#8 3359:consensus 3355:talk page 3325:, and to 3060:Thanks, 3020:Restoring 2978:Henningtl 2919:MattRaupa 2745:bender235 2741:Just did. 2680:bender235 2627:bender235 2439:George Ho 2271:Werieth, 2202:WP:NFCC#1 1186:extremely 1167:m:Mission 1035:clear-cut 950:subst:dfu 751:WP:NFCC#3 478:filmmaker 236:WP:CSD#F1 3530:Footwiks 3365:or seek 3337:states: 3311:edit war 3149:Footwiks 3116:Footwiks 2986:contribs 2974:unsigned 2927:contribs 2915:unsigned 2868:unsigned 1742:issues. 1521:reverted 1195:unstated 675:#1,3,8) 631:#1,3,8. 254:Corphine 218:Corphine 214:Li Chang 139:TRT logo 107:Corphine 37:Jax 0677 3571:Werieth 3549:Smith03 3501:Stefan2 3471:Werieth 3415:Werieth 3411:WP:NFCC 3407:WP:NFCC 3377:blocked 3375:may be 3279:Werieth 3264:Bearian 3249:Bearian 3224:Werieth 3221:WP:OTRS 3163:Werieth 3135:Werieth 3131:WP:NFCC 3077:Werieth 3003:Werieth 2944:Werieth 2940:WP:NFCC 2888:Werieth 2834:Werieth 2697:Werieth 2649:Werieth 2619:http:// 2596:ЛееСуда 2590:Тимофей 2554:Werieth 2550:WP:NFCC 2523:Werieth 2507:in situ 2493:Werieth 2454:Werieth 2402:Werieth 2373:Werieth 2342:Werieth 2333:undated 2323:sandbox 2295:Werieth 2251:Werieth 2205:Werieth 2142:Werieth 2073:Werieth 2009:Werieth 1939:Werieth 1905:Werieth 1901:WP:NFCC 1865:Werieth 1780:Werieth 1759:WP:NFCC 1744:Werieth 1708:Werieth 1706:again. 1675:Stefan2 1655:Werieth 1651:WP:DICK 1609:Werieth 1577:Werieth 1548:Werieth 1525:sandbox 1461:Werieth 1453:WP:NFCC 1416:Werieth 1376:Werieth 1348:Werieth 1317:sandbox 1305:be bold 1231:Werieth 1223:WP:NFCC 1172:Werieth 1153:Werieth 1121:Werieth 1117:WP:NFCR 1078:Werieth 1074:WP:NFCC 1013:Werieth 1009:WP:NFCR 1001:WP:NFCR 997:WP:NFCC 904:Werieth 900:WP:NFCR 892:WP:NFCC 870:WP:NFCR 851:Werieth 834:WP:NFCR 830:WP:NFCC 802:Werieth 798:WP:NFCR 755:Werieth 736:Werieth 719:WP:NFCC 677:Werieth 673:WP:NFCC 633:Werieth 629:WP:NFCC 589:Werieth 550:Werieth 504:Werieth 464:Werieth 460:WP:NFCC 429:Werieth 399:Werieth 394:WP:OTRS 345:history 326:history 285:Werieth 185:Werieth 122:Werieth 77:Bwmoll3 52:Werieth 3206:notify 2792:C.Fred 2736:WP:VPP 2732:WP:ELN 2388:μηδείς 2231:WP:NFC 2161:DePiep 2127:DePiep 2069:WT:NFC 2005:WP:NPA 1953:Aquegg 1924:Aquegg 1886:Aquegg 1846:Aquegg 1797:Begoon 1766:Begoon 1704:WP:NFC 1671:WP:FUR 1544:WP:NFC 1475:WP:ANI 1457:WT:NFC 1412:proof. 1325:log in 1031:before 1005:WP:NFC 954:before 896:WP:NFC 838:WP:NFC 794:WP:NFC 373:image? 363:WP:NFC 177:policy 3437:(sic) 3062:Crtew 2855:HELP! 2666:that. 1880:then 1435:WP:DE 1430:WP:DE 1390:WP:DE 354:Watch 16:< 3575:talk 3566:#14 3562:See 3553:talk 3534:talk 3505:talk 3475:talk 3449:talk 3419:talk 3394:talk 3283:talk 3268:talk 3253:talk 3228:talk 3204:pls 3200:talk 3167:talk 3153:talk 3139:talk 3120:talk 3102:and 3081:talk 3066:talk 3007:talk 2982:talk 2948:talk 2923:talk 2905:Talk 2892:talk 2876:talk 2838:talk 2823:talk 2814:.com 2797:talk 2779:talk 2749:talk 2701:talk 2684:talk 2676:none 2672:some 2653:talk 2631:talk 2614:Hi, 2558:talk 2527:talk 2497:talk 2477:here 2458:talk 2443:talk 2437:? -- 2406:talk 2392:talk 2377:talk 2346:talk 2299:talk 2284:talk 2255:talk 2239:talk 2209:talk 2191:talk 2165:talk 2146:talk 2131:talk 2108:talk 2077:talk 2059:talk 2013:talk 1990:talk 1957:talk 1943:talk 1928:talk 1909:talk 1890:talk 1869:talk 1850:talk 1784:talk 1748:talk 1726:talk 1712:talk 1693:talk 1679:talk 1659:talk 1628:talk 1613:talk 1595:talk 1581:talk 1566:talk 1552:talk 1533:talk 1483:talk 1465:talk 1443:talk 1420:talk 1398:talk 1380:talk 1366:talk 1352:talk 1337:talk 1294:wiki 1235:talk 1176:talk 1157:talk 1140:talk 1125:talk 1097:talk 1082:talk 1017:talk 935:talk 908:talk 882:talk 855:talk 821:talk 806:talk 784:talk 759:talk 740:talk 725:#6. 696:talk 681:talk 652:talk 637:talk 608:talk 593:talk 568:talk 554:talk 524:talk 508:talk 498:and 486:talk 468:talk 433:talk 418:talk 403:talk 383:talk 341:edit 318:edit 289:talk 258:talk 244:talk 222:talk 189:talk 167:and 154:talk 126:talk 111:talk 81:talk 56:talk 41:talk 35:? -- 2734:or 2621:to 2600:. 2156:are 2055:XXN 1986:XXN 1980:wtf 1331:). 963:not 952:}} 946:you 93:Hey 3577:) 3555:) 3536:) 3507:) 3477:) 3451:) 3421:) 3396:) 3285:) 3270:) 3255:) 3230:) 3202:) 3169:) 3155:) 3141:) 3122:) 3083:) 3068:) 3009:) 2988:) 2984:• 2950:) 2929:) 2925:• 2894:) 2878:) 2840:) 2825:) 2799:) 2781:) 2751:) 2743:-- 2703:) 2686:) 2655:) 2633:) 2560:) 2552:. 2529:) 2499:) 2460:) 2445:) 2408:) 2394:) 2379:) 2348:) 2301:) 2286:) 2257:) 2241:) 2211:) 2193:) 2167:) 2148:) 2133:) 2110:) 2079:) 2061:) 2044:” 2041:. 2037:. 2030:“ 2015:) 2007:. 1992:) 1959:) 1945:) 1930:) 1919:is 1911:) 1892:) 1871:) 1852:) 1786:) 1750:) 1728:) 1714:) 1695:) 1681:) 1661:) 1630:) 1615:) 1597:) 1583:) 1568:) 1554:) 1535:) 1485:) 1467:) 1445:) 1437:. 1422:) 1400:) 1382:) 1368:) 1354:) 1339:) 1237:) 1215:) 1210:• 1178:) 1159:) 1142:) 1127:) 1113:}} 1107:{{ 1099:) 1084:) 1051:) 1046:• 1019:) 986:) 981:• 937:) 910:) 884:) 857:) 823:) 808:) 786:) 761:) 753:. 742:) 698:) 683:) 654:) 639:) 610:) 595:) 570:) 556:) 526:) 510:) 488:) 470:) 435:) 420:) 405:) 385:) 343:| 324:| 320:| 260:) 246:) 224:) 191:) 156:) 128:) 113:) 105:? 83:) 58:) 43:) 3573:( 3551:( 3532:( 3503:( 3473:( 3462:: 3458:@ 3447:( 3440:. 3417:( 3392:( 3281:( 3266:( 3251:( 3226:( 3210:U 3198:( 3165:( 3151:( 3137:( 3118:( 3079:( 3064:( 3005:( 2980:( 2946:( 2921:( 2890:( 2874:( 2836:( 2821:( 2795:( 2789:— 2777:( 2747:( 2699:( 2682:( 2651:( 2629:( 2556:( 2525:( 2495:( 2456:( 2441:( 2404:( 2390:( 2375:( 2344:( 2297:( 2282:( 2253:( 2237:( 2207:( 2189:( 2163:( 2159:- 2144:( 2129:( 2125:- 2106:( 2075:( 2057:( 2011:( 1988:( 1955:( 1941:( 1926:( 1907:( 1888:( 1867:( 1848:( 1782:( 1746:( 1724:( 1710:( 1691:( 1677:( 1657:( 1643:) 1639:( 1626:( 1611:( 1593:( 1579:( 1564:( 1550:( 1531:( 1481:( 1463:( 1441:( 1418:( 1396:( 1378:( 1364:( 1350:( 1335:( 1233:( 1213:c 1207:t 1205:( 1174:( 1155:( 1138:( 1123:( 1095:( 1080:( 1066:1 1062:: 1058:@ 1049:c 1043:t 1041:( 1015:( 984:c 978:t 976:( 933:( 906:( 880:( 853:( 819:( 804:( 782:( 757:( 738:( 732:: 728:@ 694:( 679:( 650:( 635:( 606:( 591:( 566:( 552:( 522:( 506:( 484:( 466:( 431:( 416:( 401:( 381:( 350:· 347:) 339:( 331:· 328:) 316:( 287:( 256:( 242:( 220:( 187:( 152:( 124:( 109:( 79:( 54:( 39:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index