User talk:Werieth/201312

1519:, I've read links which are vague regarding using various terms including tragically...the 'usually' avoided is not definitive. So if it's not definitive and the word's neutral in the context of the edit then i need a few more independent minds looking at the edit in question. The reason I'm questioning the independence of the editor above is the quickness of him backing your revert and point of view. I apologize for the delay but I'm new to this and I also work. I know two gentlemen who are wikipedia editors but it would make a mockery of the site to ask them to look at my edit as they may back point of view. 169: 437:

of commentary that justifies non-free media). There is just a very little bit in the controversies section discussion the artistic and visual contents of the image (which is the type of thing needed to justify an image, as just because an artist had several styles or multiple works we dont need to display more than a very limited number for "examples". However if there is other notable, and sourcable critical commentary about the images justification becomes easier).

465: 31: 786: 1212:. True, it is absolutely within policy. I would even agree with your (assumed) point here, that decorative galleries shouldn't use NFC media. However the overall effect of your edit is faintly ridiculous: you leave an article with glaring holes in it. As is evident from your editing history, you have negligible interest in improving articles or in encyclopedia quality, you simply act like a 'bot and bulk delete NFC material (see also 597: 1345:

Knowledge, don't see a problem with either Bradfordians having the term 'tragically murdered', but puzzeled how my term has been removed within hours of posting it yet it's obvious that the term has been on wikipedia describing one brave souls murder for years, without being removed, which seems to indicate to me the term is simply a softer description, not as stark as killed but certainly imo both descriptions are neutral.

738:

maintained by excellent editors, and they deserve a little more care than is possible when dealing with new accounts advocating for a garage band. It's likely that editors of topics related to Shakespeare have never heard of NFCC, and it's hard to tell the difference between an enforcer and the random warriors that are often seen at Knowledge. Fortunately the admins who saw your attempt at ANI are smarter than average.

2452: 2100:

is dead, dead, dead commercially (still is a widely known logo for the Ambisonic technology, which makes it useful for wikipedia to have it). B) Others have argued that its design is very close to not being copyrightable at all. C) I have tried to point out why the Minimal use imperative is not applicable and why the chance that its use on wikipedia will ever be contested is practically nil.

886: 2770:

owns the alternate photo that we discussed last night, with no success. There simply is no alternative at this point and I believe a photograph is important to the article. The fact that Pitillo is still alive, does in fact mean that a free photo MAY become available at some point. Today however, one does NOT exist, thus is my basis for claiming Fair Use. Merry Christmas!

337:"8) Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." The article is a total failure without the images which you have repeatedly removed, as one needs to see at least some examples of visual art, and talk only goes so far. 334:"3) Minimal usage" The article is using 4 images to represent the work of a 50 year art career which spans many styles and periods. 3 illustrate the major/most famous works from the 3 most famous series, and the 4th is essential for showing the variation in one of those series. All of them are discussed directly, and representative of series discussed in detail. 1166:), be careful not to violate 3RR (unless there's a serious copyright violation, but even then it's better to ask for help than to continue reverting). I think simply not complying with one aspect of the policy – e.g. not having a clear-enough rationale – would not be enough to claim a 3RR exemption. I know what 331:"1) No free equivalent" There are no free equivalent images because all works by the artist are copyright. As it is an article about an artist who produces visual art key examples of that work are essential to their discussion. This is the case on literally thousands of similar wikipedia pages on artists. 2769:

Good Morning. I intend to continue to make my claim of "fair use" of this photograph to illustrate the article that I have written. I have demonstrated good faith and exhausted all efforts to locate either a free image, or a licensed photo from a film distribution company. I contacted the person who

1671:

Are you going to go through all artists where there is more than one cover and delete them? I do not understand why this one article should be different. Stop deleting the cover art which references the fact there were different releases across the globe. I see from previous edits others have argued

1006:

Edit-warring is edit-warring. It is disruptive to the smooth running of WP, including the NFCR board. Your edit-warring (which is self-evident, I'm not going to mince words) does nothing to further your assumed aim of ensuring that WP appropriately complies with its relevant policies, it merely sends

193:

Hi, you rightly removed the images from this article yesterday. I have now done the Summary/Licensing information thoroughly and properly, and amended the relevant parts of the article to make sure the specific references are present and correct. The use of these images is now consistent with the way

2099:

This is just rhetoric. What are the "half dozen reasons"? You make it sound like I have this evil corporate agenda and the case is totally undefendable. All I'm trying to do is make a series of articles visually coherent, and the issues around this logo are very weak to begin with: A) This trademark

2036:

just post template replies, but actually consider my arguments. I'm very much interested in solving this, but it's not obvious to me how. Standard Knowledge procedure seems unable to handle the use of logos on multiple related pages. I can always just copy that fair use rationale X times for each of

436:

I did not start with a final warning, I posted the final warning after leaving the first warning on their talk page, and discussion here where the user didnt get the point, and continued to re-insert NFCC violations. None of the added commentary is what is defined as critical commentary (IE the type

2311:

Again, proof that you were stalking me. You reverted one of the changes within minutes of me starting work on the draft again. Your insinuations about my edits and your lack of Good Faith in my edits are more proof that you have an axe to grind against anyone who doesn't agree with you. Please just

2286:

Must be super secret stalker reports then, because I see no public reports where this information is available. In case case, I would have less of a problem if you had "commented out" the images so they would have been left in place, or if you hadn't reverted the document while I was working on it,

1226:

WP has no consensus of pressure to remove NFC images in the way that you clearly edit to achieve. If it did, then it would be a simple 'bot task to do so. Instead WP's overall position is that NFC blanking is too subtle to be done by a crude 'bot and so requires the conscious effort of an editor to

501:

That is strictly your interpretation of fair use rules, which are controversial to begin with. Both those images have fair use rationales attached, the images Re critically discussed in the text and that discussion is sourced. Articles on artists need images and those images comply with guidelines.

1344:

Hi, I originally put killed but then i was looking at other people that had been killed doing their jobs on the Bradfordians list and came across Sharon Beshenivsky, she was also tragically murdered, I'm surmising that term has been there as long as the piece regarding Sharon's murder has been on

524:

BTW, 1,3 and 8? Those criteria actually point to why these images fall under fair use and can be used. They are used minimally -- two small images, they are necessary for an understanding of the work and are discussed in the sourced text, and their are no free alternative images available. So the

67:

May i ask you why have you removed pictures and names (persons); Pete Maravich, Brad Dexter and Bill Vukovich, from the "Serbian American" infobox of prominent Serbian Americans? They are known to be famous Americans of Serbian origin (as also described on each of their articles) and would really

2904:

Hi Werieth, the images placed in the sections of the Zahara article were discussed few months ago. Other users said it was okay to keep. There was a discussion template placed at the top of the article regarding the removal of the images from the article. If you go through the article's history,

750:

My reference to the "smarter" admin is that the article was fully protected to avoid blocking the participants. There must be a better way of enforcing NFCC that does not involve major disruption—excellent content builders should not be sucked into edit wars, and should be persuaded rather than

2103:

I would like to address your complaint of a missing fair use rationale, but at the same time contest your decision to remove the logos from all but the main page. How do I do that? I believe the use of this logo several times is warranted, and your arguments do not convince me (mostly template

1119:

My understanding is that you agreed to remove fair-use images (of the non-urgent kind) just once from an article. Not one revert, where you can remove and if reverted remove again, and not 1RR, where you can remove every 24 hours, but just once per article (whether it's one image or a group of

689:

earlier this year and it didn't fly then. You got no support for your nonconstructive adventures within the wider Knowledge community then and yet you're trying the same thing with the same article now with no new rationale. Do you really need to waste time with this again? In case you have

737:

should have some boilerplate or a link to provide as an explanation when opposition is encountered. Bear in mind that the issue is not that urgent that it must be resolved in the next five minutes, and by just edit warring you are sucking good editors into a trap. This is an excellent article

194:

copyrighted images are used on the majority of artist pages, and they are absolutely essential to making it a good article (in truth are few more are probably required for other series). In future I will also expande the commentary on them (and others will too) as there is much to draw from.

1484:

I note it says 'usually' avoided, regarding tragically, that is hardly set in stone and seems to open up a case for using that term on occasions, given the context. I certainly wouldn't class the term as vandalism or not neutral in regards to my edit as there are occasions when it's used on

1652:, we restrict the usage of non-free media, Just because it had multiple covers doesn't mean we need to or should display all of them. Given that there where 5 covers of what is essentially a glorified track listing, There isnt justification for more than the 1 cover that remains. (See 2615:

Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. This includes non-free promotional

1998:

for why I think the minimal use imperative does not apply here (and why I've written a blanket fair-use rationale). Let me know what you think of this reasoning. Maybe you can suggest how to handle this most effectively, to avoid automatic removals of this logo in the future? Thanks,

1135:

The way you phrased the question is hard to follow, But let me repeat what I said on AN. I will only remove a file once if it is a case where the removal is questionable or subjective if it is re-added Ill file a NFCR (aka 1R). However in cases where the removal isnt subjective

1249:

Actually a bot could do it and be within consensus, however no bot operator is willing to put up with that level of abuse. I have zero obligation to find replacements for NFC violations, and I dont plan to do so. This is your final warning stop stalking my edits /harassing me.

2806:

Don't know if you're just away for the holiday or if I should respond elsewhere. I have attempted to contact cousin via facebook. She has the only free photos that I have ever found. We would still need her permission to use any, and she has yet to reply.

842: 849:

has transcluded the special pages since July, so this would definitely have been spotted earlier if the database reports had listed this page. Do you know if there is some other way to find pages using non-free files by transcluding special pages?

782: 1044:

actions and failure to understand NFCC, your stalking and harassment I will file a ban request for you if you continue your inappropriate actions. I have not requested any bans yet for you, just brought up the possibility several times given

2412:

and making false claims of wikistalking. If I wanted to I could go over every single article you have edited for NFC issues and I would be 100% in the correct, but you know what? I'm not that spiteful. I tend to focus on the bigger issues.

1802:, but if you has cleared ]], ]], ]] and ]] lines, administrators can think that those files aren't used in any article, and they can be deleted, even they have non-free logo copyright option. So I have reverted to the last version. 1264:

Is this your fourth "final warning" of me now? If you're so convinced that you're in the right, then you know where WP:ANI is, otherwise please stop with the empty threats. Your baseless bullying works on some editors (you have a

2037:

the pages I intend to use it on, but that seems a bit crufty. I believe the use of the logo is absolutely warranted, and that less strict criteria should apply since there is no possible commercial interest for this logo.

1140:#14, NFCC#10c,#9 and other similar cases) multiple removals are often needed before the user re-adding the file gets the point. I think this is a very reasonable middle ground where both sides can move forward from there. 2296:

Not really, they are standard database reports. the only reason I gave a final warning was after you re-added the files multiple times. Given your history with non-free content I felt that a final warning was justified.

502:

Do not remove the images based on your own interpretation of guidelines. You are not the final word on these guidelines. If you disagree, you discuss, not revert. I have restored the images per fair use. Leave them.

1063:

Or on what grounds are you going to say that my actions where questionable? I can point several different parts of policy for removal that would place it solidly within the realm of unquestionable for each of them.

2905:

you'll see that the template was removed by an administrator. I'll wait for your response. If you tell me those images can't be there, I would create two separate articles. Can't believe I'm going over this again.

1627:

I do not understand how showing the cover art for each release is excessive use of non-free content? I would understand if more than one page of CD cover art was used per release, but not one for each territory.

2346:

So, you follow my working draft so you can swoop in and pick fights over minor issues? You can justify it anyway you'd like. Please stop following my draft page, it's the first step in not being a wikistalker.

1695:

be removed if they agree with you. If they decide this is the case, then approved wiki-editors will have their work cut out doing the same to "every" article within wiki with more than one cover image.

1852:

article won't be interesting. I love Cut the Rope games, and I want to contribute Cut the Rope article in order to improve its information. You can ask other users whether keep those files or not.

1624:

Kids Like You and Me on the same page was a completely different release. This could technically have its own page as a separate release so at "the very least" should be reinstated in my opinion.

2710:

She's the one in white. The little girl is her daughter Eva. I can provide her agents info if someone from Knowledge wants to solve the issue. I'm not an academic, I do this because I want to.

1348:

Something strange has happened regarding the reference i used, it doesn't seem to exist on the link that I supplied this afternoon, will try to get another reference linked sometime tomorrow.

1704:

Sorry about erasing the Mandela page, my browser had an error, I was only supposed to edit one section and my browser seems to have deleted all the other sections. Thanks for reverting.

1631:

Also, there are many many articles within wiki where this practice is used to show the different releases in different countries from many artists. Should all of these be deleted too?

1231:

content (not simply blanking by rote) of it. You clearly take no interest in such matters: encyclopedia quality is an unimportant matter for the other editors to worry about instead.

1116:

has closed the thread at WP:AN, saying "Werieth has agreed to limit himself to one revert." This is ambiguous, but rather than re-opening the thread, I'm hoping you can just clarify.

1880:

Usage of non-free media is restricted, yes it may make the article more visually interesting but wikipedia's requirements for usage of those icons requires a lot more than that.

2746:

The person who took the photo is family of Pitillo. That person will go to her and ask if it's ok. Pitillo will say No. If Pitillo could erase the article, she would do so.

282:

I think Morris Louis is an example of an incomplete article. He is famous for at least 3 styles (or periods) of work. By only illustrating one the article is surely incomplete?

1656:). If there was reliably sourced commentary of the graphics used on the cover that would be a different story, but as the article currently is the files cannot be justified. 1010:

NFCC is complex and subjective. These images include at least one major artwork by a notable artist, of a substantially notable individual subject. It's relevance per NFC is

2675:

I have worked on this article for eight months. What you are asking for simply does NOT exist. I have two photos taken by a family friend. Both include other people.

1283:

I have given you warnings for different issues, I really dont care if you "fall for it" or not your behavior is unacceptable and if it continues I will take it to ANI.

73: 1944:

Why you are doing this? In those discution about Chelsea logos thay was all kept. Why you want to delete my images and remove gallery from article? My personal hater?

2242:

I am not stalking you at all, the only reason I saw your user draft was due to the non-free media in it. It had 5+ non-free files and was outside of article space.

1548:), but I caution the IP that s/he is in great peril of having her/his account blocked for edit warring if s/he keeps making the wording changes to the article. — 1003:

Didn't you seek a topic ban for me last week, after your other two final warnings? As I recall, it ended with you being blocked again for edit-warring over NFCC.

2193:

Werieth, thanks for giving more detail and explaining your reasoning. However, it does not change my own assessment of the situation. Thanks for pointing me to

1223:

these images. If your point is that these images are so commonplace that they have no value to justify the use of NFC, then this would be an easy task for you.

262:

is a good example, there is 1 non-free file, not the 4-5 that you where using. Given that there is sourced commentary and discussion (Like I previously said)

418:

Your actions seem very harsh, to immediately give a final warning, particularly with an editor who appears to be a 'newbie' with generally good intentions.

69: 2609:

NFCC#1 does not require that a free file be available, or even currently exist, just that a free file can be created and replace the non-free version. See

478: 1672:

with you about this. I have had approved items from wiki-registered editors where this has been done with the words "Good Job" left on my talk page.

1762: 422:

added a commentary about the images that were added back, for example. Throwing acronyms around the place, like WP:NFCR is hardly helpful either.

2256:

Exactly, how would you know that I was editing a draft of that page if you weren't wikistaking me. Please stop, or I will have to take action. --

1500:

I have not given you any warnings for vandalism, I have given you POV warnings. Multiple users have told you that your edits are not acceptable.

146:

I have removed the files again, do not re-add them. Because we have multiple free files we cannot justify the usage of those non-free files.

2789:

Maria Pitillo is on the left. I have asked them for permission to use this photo, or if we are lucky, a better one from their portfolio.

1848:

I understand, but... But those files are used to demonstrate Cut the Rope games, I suggest keeping those files. If you delete those files,

1324:

I am not an admin, thus I cannot delete or undelete the file for you. If you poke an admin they should do it for you without any hassle.

340:

I wish you would back off here, as no one else has found it problematic, and I have twice run it by multiple people in the help chatroom.

661: 100:, Those files are only used on the article about their respective person (which does meet policy), usage in an infobox however doesnt. 1912: 1868: 1818: 1568: 1520: 1486: 1451: 1421: 1387: 1349: 685: 1545: 84:

The files I removed where non-free and their usage is controlled fairly heavily, usage in an infobox just doesnt meet the policy on

550:

The article is about the artist not the works, minimal is zero, Just because something is discussed doesn't mean we need an image.

1450:

The act its self defines the context in which 'tragically murdered' is deemed neutral. The link you posted simply backs that up.

834: 1040:

is a cut and try case of unquestionable violation. I know the complexity of NFCC far far more than you do. Given your driveby

285:

Please explain which points of the Knowledge:NFCC policy are not met? As far as I can see the ones I used met all points 1-10.

2821:

I dont mean to sound harsh, but regardless of the fact that you cannot find a free photo, one can still be created, and thus

2786: 2481:

I want, if the parameter height is complete with a number, to show, automatically ]. For example, by put 1,73 will show 1,73

1435:

Who defines what qualifies as tragic? why are some called tragic and others not? It is a very biased term. Killed is a fact.

937: 629: 1583:

I fixed the rationales and readded a couple of them, but I have one question; you never heard of a backspace button before?

1420:

It's all interpretation, I certainly interpret it differently, tragically murdered is neutral as is the description 'killed'

833:

I found out that you can transclude special pages such as {{Special:ListFiles}} and {{Special:NewFiles}}. See for example

554:

can and is fairly easily replaced with plain text (#1,#8). The other image that was removed falls into the same category.

393: 1621:

Do What's Good for Me was released via different record labels in different territories. Each one had a different cover.

1541: 1037: 949: 905: 897: 2197:, I will think about the matter some more and then probably take it there. No ill feelings, though. Happy holidays, -- 2085:

remain. I could have listed half a dozen reasons for removal in each case, but I just listed the most obvious reason.

1303: 953: 733:

I understand that it is not possible to fully explain every action taken, but anyone enforcing an obscure policy like

645: 621: 2500:

You would need to use the {{#if:{{{height}}}|{{{height|}}}]|}} or something similar (have havent tested that sample)

1367:

places both an undue and non-neutral tone to those entries. I have pruned the entire article of similar phrases. See

2427:

While I would love to debate the finer points of wikistalking with you, perhaps I should just say that you violate

1758: 38: 1120:

images). Then if someone restores the image(s) you would open a discussion somewhere. Is that what you've agreed?

2844: 2812: 2794: 2775: 2751: 2715: 2687: 2652: 2638: 2597: 2561: 2032:

Werieth, I'm a bit thin-skinned at the moment because I've had exactly the same thing over at Commons. Please do

959: 604: 471: 464: 1466: 901: 846: 771: 551: 1754: 1018:"unquestionably violate" NFCC and 3RRNO#5. In addition, you have been frequently warned and even blocked over 989:#5. The next time you warn me/revert without understanding NFCC I will be forced to seek a topic ban for you. 310:#1,3,8. there just isnt justification for those files. Do not re-add. If you want the removals reviewed see 97: 89: 1158:

Okay, thank you. I think you should stick to your "one removal only" for any enforcement of the guideline (

2170: 2070: 1995: 1984: 1908: 1864: 1814: 1709: 1685: 1642: 1572: 1524: 1516: 1490: 1455: 1425: 1391: 1353: 1274: 1239: 1027: 968: 945: 917: 893: 580: 531: 508: 93: 288:

It's essential to have at least 3 images in this article to illustrate those 3 different 'main' periods.

2910: 2682:

Pitillo is very very very resentful of the article and will NOT consent to providing a licensed photo.

2431:. Now, I am signing off for a while and going to a holiday party. I think you should do that as well. -- 726: 129: 1234:

As I noted, you are absolutely within policy here. Yet these are also much less than impressive edits.

266:

could justify one image. Otherwise there just isnt the critical commentary needed to justify the rest.

68:

deserve their place in that infobox, i anway saw pictures of those persons on many articles. Regards (

2840: 2808: 2790: 2771: 2747: 2711: 2683: 2648: 2634: 2606: 2593: 2571: 2557: 2268:

There are several reports that your draft came up on. (Pages with 5 or more non-free images, and two

1900: 1856: 1806: 1750: 1588: 1123:

As I said, this won't solve the problem entirely, but it will go a good way to reducing frustration.

485: 379: 341: 289: 245: 198: 2839:

OK, that's fine. I will not contribute any more time or effort to Knowledge. It's not worth it.

941: 909: 695: 383: 345: 293: 249: 202: 168: 1634: 1093: 2866: 2490: 2202: 2109: 2056: 2042: 2004: 796: 756: 743: 396:

has 3 sentences supporting it, almost zero critical commentary, and fails the second part of #8.

263: 187: 2554: 1042:

WP:NFCR#File:10ontenshot.jpg_in_10_on_Ten.2C_in_reference_to_Cinematic_style_of_Abbas_Kiarostami

912:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

985:? Also please stop stalking my edits. The removals in question are exempt from 3RR, Please see 216:

just wasnt being met, there is one section that could justify an image but it doesnt have one.

2889: 2830: 2737: 2701: 2666: 2622: 2583: 2538: 2505: 2418: 2371: 2337: 2302: 2277: 2247: 2184: 2166: 2134: 2090: 2023: 1972: 1929: 1904: 1885: 1860: 1838: 1810: 1779: 1727: 1719: 1705: 1681: 1661: 1638: 1603: 1505: 1474: 1440: 1410: 1376: 1329: 1288: 1270: 1255: 1235: 1145: 1069: 1054: 1023: 994: 978: 964: 870: 855: 823: 811: 715: 576: 559: 526: 503: 442: 401: 367: 318: 271: 221: 175: 151: 105: 47: 17: 2647:

I deeply regret having written this article for Knowledge. I wish that I could undo it all.

2081:

on several points. Even if you copy/paste the rationales the underlying issues in regards to

2906: 2870: 2527: 2287:

or if you hadn't issued a "final" warning. It's all very stalkerish, and very unfriendly. --

1555: 1167: 1113: 827: 651: 141: 125: 1743: 1964: 1584: 1314: 1180: 1124: 1097: 986: 669: 427: 1959:

It is nothing personal at all, usage of non-free media (which most logos are) Must meet

2725: 2575: 2459: 2428: 2409: 2360: 2329: 2269: 2194: 2126: 2122: 2118: 1653: 1649: 1402: 1368: 1203: 1163: 1041: 982: 841:, but pages transcluding these special pages do not appear in database reports such as 838: 734: 359: 355: 311: 307: 213: 85: 843:

Knowledge:Database reports/Pages containing an unusually high number of non-free files

124:, her life and career. Your sudden onslaught of numerous contributions is unbalanced. 2881: 2822: 2610: 2486: 2198: 2105: 2082: 2078: 2052: 2038: 2015: 2000: 1960: 1949: 1831: 1540:

is a bright-line rule. S/He may not be familiar with that, but s/he just broke it at

1537: 1159: 1137: 1046: 792: 752: 739: 633: 572: 392:

We dont include images just to provide examples. Taking a random image as an example

2729: 2679: 2676: 2451: 2885: 2826: 2803: 2733: 2697: 2662: 2618: 2579: 2534: 2501: 2414: 2367: 2333: 2298: 2273: 2243: 2180: 2130: 2086: 2019: 1968: 1925: 1881: 1849: 1834: 1799: 1791: 1775: 1742:

Hello - That is not the official Adore You cover. Miley tweeted the official here:

1723: 1677: 1657: 1599: 1501: 1470: 1436: 1406: 1372: 1325: 1284: 1251: 1141: 1086: 1065: 1050: 990: 866: 851: 807: 711: 641: 637: 617: 613: 555: 438: 397: 363: 314: 267: 259: 217: 147: 101: 2051:

Oh, and can't we first discuss this and then edit? Nobody likes extra work, right?

1550: 1179:

The key point is that the less you revert, the happier people will be with you.

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1830:

I have re-removed the files, they do not meet our criteria for usage under our

2914: 2893: 2874: 2848: 2834: 2816: 2798: 2779: 2755: 2741: 2732:

under a free license we can get a fairly good crop from that for her article.

2719: 2705: 2691: 2670: 2656: 2642: 2626: 2601: 2587: 2578:

as replaceable. Given the person is still living a free image can be created.

2565: 2542: 2509: 2494: 2463: 2435: 2432: 2422: 2405: 2400: 2397: 2375: 2356: 2351: 2348: 2341: 2321: 2316: 2313: 2306: 2291: 2288: 2281: 2265: 2260: 2257: 2251: 2239: 2233: 2230: 2206: 2188: 2174: 2138: 2113: 2094: 2074: 2060: 2046: 2027: 2008: 1991: 1976: 1953: 1933: 1916: 1889: 1872: 1842: 1822: 1783: 1766: 1731: 1713: 1665: 1607: 1592: 1559: 1528: 1509: 1494: 1478: 1459: 1444: 1429: 1414: 1395: 1380: 1357: 1333: 1318: 1310: 1292: 1278: 1259: 1243: 1185: 1149: 1129: 1102: 1073: 1058: 1031: 998: 972: 874: 859: 815: 800: 760: 725:

In an earlier example of this issue, I gave the following reply to Werieth at

719: 704: 673: 665: 584: 563: 541: 518: 488: 446: 431: 423: 405: 387: 371: 349: 322: 297: 275: 253: 240: 225: 206: 181: 155: 133: 109: 77: 2865:

Please explain your deletion of the team's logo from the each seasons' page.

2455: 927:; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. 625: 495: 121: 1567:

Does the three revert rule apply to everyone? 16:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

787:

el:Κατηγορία:Πρότυπο:Football teams για ομάδα που δεν υπάρχει στον κατάλογο

2553:

Quick question. Are there any issues with the image that I posted? Link:

1536:

Forgive me butting in, but let me take a moment to remind the IP that the

2125:#8, 14 sorta applies. That is half a dozen reasons. If you want a review 1945: 1213: 940:

to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents

2066: 197:

Thanks for your help and I hope you find the improvements satisfactory.

2785:

Another option: I have contacted the studio responsible for this photo

2661:

Why do you say that? the odds are we will be able to get a free image.

1309:

Please undelete the image now that article is in mainspace. Thank you,

925:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made

1405:

Knowledge takes a neutral view, and our articles should reflect that.

120:

The files you deleted are important to get a deeper understanding of

231:

How is it any different to the use of files at the following pages?

1515:

And so you shouldn't.... but we have it here from someone else.....

1386:

In who's opinion, yours? You've no more right to prune than i have.

2482: 2077:

and only that page. Usage of their logo on other pages violations

1544:. Please continue discussing the merits of the edit here (or at 362:, until that time the article cannot justify 4+ non-free files. 2592:

What am I missing then? I cannot find a free image anywhere.

2555:

https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Maria_Pitillo_Publicity_Photo.png

2165:

Werieth also removed it from the main article. I restored it.

2065:

The usage of non-free media is highly restricted, Knowledge's

1994:

sub-pages because of a missing free-use rationale. Please see

1722:, No problem I figured something like that probably happened. 1676:

I have filed a NFCR, after which those files will be removed.

1485:

wikipedia, the very idea that i'd vadalise anything is absurd.

936:

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's

234: 25: 884: 595: 481:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

463: 378:

I truly fail to see how my address of those points is wrong.

2485:. Please don't suggest the use of any other templmte. Thx. 2328:

I got pinged, I took a look and reverted your violation of

2014:

Blanket and widespread usage of non-free material violates

1014:

cut and dried, it is precisely the sort of issue that does

952:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary 2520:

How do you delete sandbox? Not that I want my deleted. ]

778:

Is there a way not the template not be in this category?

237: 636:. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek 2359:

Im not following anything I saw a textbook violation of

1744:

https://twitter.com/MileyCyrus/status/413466996979040256

2364: 2325: 1210: 1207: 1199: 691: 419: 2179:

That was an accident, and thank you for restoring it.

865:

I have no clue how to look for those kinds of things.

1170:

says on that point, but it's worded a little broadly.

944:

among editors. You can post a request for help at an

772:

User talk:Werieth/201309#Find template with parameter

640:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 1096:. Posting here too in case the ping doesn't work. 931:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. 1049:in regards to NFCC which you seem to be lacking. 241:https://en.wikipedia.org/File:PicassoGuernica.jpg 2730:http://www.pinterest.com/pin/379006124862387066/ 2680:http://www.pinterest.com/pin/379006124862387066/ 2677:http://www.pinterest.com/pin/379006124862387069/ 1896:So what can I do in order to keep those files? 2724:If you can get your friend to upload and email 731: 1517:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:2.100.37.249 2633:Have at it, let me know how that works out. 1963:, the files where removed by both myself and 770:Hello. Before 3 months you help me with this 644:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may 8: 710:Ill be filing a NFCR for this abuse of NFC. 628:. During a dispute, you should first try to 1598:What do you mean by the backspace comment? 660:below this notice, but you should read the 358:. If you want the removals reviewed file a 2696:Is she the one in the black or white top? 2574:that photo will be deleted soon, it fails 1990:Hi *! You commented out the logos on most 1092:Hi, I've pinged you to let you know about 896:according to the reverts you have made on 783:el:Πρότυπο:Football teams/Κατάλογος ομάδων 683:You tried a series of disruptive edits of 470:Hello, Werieth. You have new messages at 2363:and fixed it. The same thing I have done 1967:because they failed to meet that policy. 1774:Can I please have a little more context? 1613: 892:You currently appear to be engaged in an 354:I doubt that they are that familiar with 264:Ian Scott (artist)#.22Girlie.22_paintings 690:forgotten, below is the discussion from 2825:prohibits the usage of non-free media. 2549:File:Maria Pitillo Publicity Photo.png 1579:About you "commenting out" your images 1269:history), but I'm not falling for it. 116:Stop messing with relevant Media-files 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2396:Maybe you should find a new hobby. -- 1924:Nothing, the files are unacceptable. 806:Im not sure what you are asking for. 776:Just add a category after the last }. 525:actual policy you quote backs me up. 235:https://en.wikipedia.org/Morris_Louis 7: 956:. If you engage in an edit war, you 2473:I have this syntax in a template. 1614:Do What's Good for Me - 2 Unlimited 1206:) as broadly disruptive. Similarly 918:Knowledge's policy on edit warring 686:Duke Ellington at Fargo, 1940 Live 238:https://en.wikipedia.org/Jeff_Wall 24: 1546:Talk:List of people from Bradford 2450: 2408:Maybe you should stop violating 1162:). As for enforcing the policy ( 167: 29: 2324:Its called Echo, when you made 981:are you stupid or just being a 837:. This is a clear violation of 835:Special:PermanentLink/562555956 2478:| data7 = {{{height|}}} 916:Please be particularly aware, 904:with others, to avoid editing 746:) 00:20, 19 October 2013 (UTC) 1: 2915:22:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC) 2894:05:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC) 2875:05:27, 28 December 2013 (UTC) 2849:14:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 2835:14:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 2817:00:18, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 2799:15:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 2780:13:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 2756:01:28, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 2742:01:21, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 2720:01:17, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 2706:01:12, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 2692:01:07, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 2671:00:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 2657:00:57, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 2643:00:40, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 2627:00:38, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 2602:00:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 2588:00:28, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 2566:22:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2543:14:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 2510:14:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 2495:20:22, 26 December 2013 (UTC) 2464:23:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2446:Glad Tidings and all that ... 2436:22:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2423:21:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2401:21:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2376:21:38, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2352:21:35, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2342:21:33, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2317:21:31, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2307:21:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2292:21:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2282:21:16, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2261:21:14, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2252:21:12, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2234:21:10, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2207:14:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2189:14:10, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2175:14:06, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2139:14:10, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2114:14:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2095:13:24, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2061:12:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2047:12:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2028:12:30, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 2009:12:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1977:02:05, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1954:02:00, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1934:02:37, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 1917:02:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 1890:01:37, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 1873:01:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 1843:01:21, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 1823:01:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 1784:21:18, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 1767:20:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 1732:18:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 1714:18:48, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 1686:01:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 1666:01:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 1643:01:10, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 1608:16:18, 15 December 2013 (UTC) 1593:06:49, 15 December 2013 (UTC) 1560:16:31, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1529:16:17, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1510:13:29, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1495:12:29, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1479:12:06, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1460:12:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1445:11:35, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1430:11:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1415:10:56, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1396:10:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1381:23:16, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 1358:22:19, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 1334:18:33, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 1319:17:28, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 1293:16:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 1279:16:49, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 1260:16:30, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 1244:16:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 630:discuss controversial changes 608:from editing for a period of 394:File:Ian Scott Track 1968.jpg 2069:is to provide free content. 1542:List of people from Bradford 1186:21:06, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 1150:19:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 1130:19:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 1103:22:48, 8 December 2013 (UTC) 1074:19:56, 8 December 2013 (UTC) 1059:19:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC) 1038:List of people from Bradford 1032:19:29, 8 December 2013 (UTC) 999:14:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC) 973:14:18, 8 December 2013 (UTC) 898:List of people from Bradford 875:14:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC) 860:14:02, 6 December 2013 (UTC) 816:18:19, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 801:04:15, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 761:04:06, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 720:18:19, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 705:02:56, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 674:17:38, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 585:02:50, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 564:14:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 542:13:40, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 519:13:32, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 489:19:11, 1 December 2013 (UTC) 447:21:26, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 432:21:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 406:11:26, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 388:11:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 372:11:16, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 350:11:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 323:11:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 298:09:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 276:09:28, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 254:09:23, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 226:09:04, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 207:00:04, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 182:14:55, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 156:09:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 134:01:30, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 110:19:11, 1 December 2013 (UTC) 78:18:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC) 2229:Please stop stalking me. -- 1746:please fix it if you can. 1304:File:Renee Orta Salgado.jpg 1219:Better editing would be to 1007:everyone around in circles. 472:MichaelQSchmidt's talk page 2930: 1194:harassment by Andy Dingley 692:your own talk page history 2365:thousands of times before 662:guide to appealing blocks 2787:Red Tricycle Awards 2013 1798:Thanks for your edit at 1465:Actually it doesnt, see 910:try to reach a consensus 900:. Users are expected to 847:User:Vanischenu/specials 774:. I did as you had said 679:Disruptive edits déjà vu 552:File:Jeff Wall Mimic.jpg 212:I re-removed the files, 1832:non-free content policy 1227:apply judgement and to 946:appropriate noticeboard 179:at Kudpung's talk page. 2476:| label7 = Height 2129:is where you file it. 2071:File:AmbisonicLogo.svg 2018:. Do not re-add them. 1996:File:AmbisonicLogo.svg 1985:File:AmbisonicLogo.svg 1940:Werieth against images 889: 748: 600: 575:still applies to you. 468: 98:File:Pete maravich.jpg 90:File:Bill Vukovich.jpg 2469:Syntax in a template. 888: 727:Talk:Titus Andronicus 656:Your reason here ~~~~ 620:and violation of the 599: 467: 42:of past discussions. 486:User:MichaelQSchmidt 94:File:Brad Dexter.JPG 1790:About your edit at 1755:TheGirlw&things 1365:tragically murdered 648:by adding the text 1112:Hi Werieth, I see 950:dispute resolution 890: 694:as a reminder. — 638:dispute resolution 601: 479:remove this notice 469: 188:Ian Scott (artist) 1920: 1903:comment added by 1876: 1859:comment added by 1826: 1809:comment added by 1770: 1753:comment added by 1538:three-revert rule 1467:WP:EDITORIALIZING 1198:I see edits like 1184: 1128: 1101: 824:Special:ListFiles 822:Transclusions of 646:appeal this block 622:three-revert rule 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Werieth 2921: 2532: 2526: 2454: 2104:wielding again). 1919: 1897: 1875: 1853: 1825: 1803: 1769: 1747: 1183: 1127: 1100: 887: 828:Special:NewFiles 702: 701: 659: 598: 538: 535: 515: 512: 482: 180: 178: 171: 145: 60:Serbian American 33: 32: 26: 2929: 2928: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2902: 2863: 2841:Djfitzgerald111 2809:Djfitzgerald111 2791:Djfitzgerald111 2772:Djfitzgerald111 2748:Djfitzgerald111 2712:Djfitzgerald111 2684:Djfitzgerald111 2649:Djfitzgerald111 2635:Djfitzgerald111 2607:Djfitzgerald111 2594:Djfitzgerald111 2572:Djfitzgerald111 2558:Djfitzgerald111 2551: 2530: 2524: 2518: 2471: 2448: 2227: 1988: 1942: 1898: 1854: 1804: 1796: 1748: 1740: 1702: 1616: 1581: 1342: 1307: 1196: 1110: 1094:this discussion 1090: 954:page protection 885: 883: 831: 768: 766:Need help again 697: 696: 681: 676: 649: 642:page protection 596: 593: 536: 533: 513: 510: 499: 483: 476: 461: 191: 173: 166: 164: 139: 118: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2927: 2925: 2901: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2862: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2744: 2708: 2673: 2645: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2550: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2517: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2477: 2470: 2467: 2447: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2226: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2177: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2101: 2073:is allowed on 1987: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1941: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1895: 1893: 1892: 1846: 1845: 1795: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1739: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1701: 1698: 1689: 1688: 1669: 1668: 1615: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1580: 1577: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1513: 1512: 1482: 1481: 1448: 1447: 1418: 1417: 1384: 1383: 1341: 1340:Nanette Hanson 1338: 1337: 1336: 1306: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1204:Asian American 1195: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1153: 1152: 1109: 1106: 1089: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1008: 1004: 934: 933: 928: 913: 882: 879: 878: 877: 830: 820: 819: 818: 767: 764: 723: 722: 680: 677: 602:You have been 594: 592: 589: 588: 587: 569: 568: 567: 566: 545: 544: 498: 492: 475: 462: 460: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 450: 449: 411: 410: 409: 408: 376: 375: 374: 338: 335: 332: 328: 327: 326: 325: 301: 300: 286: 283: 279: 278: 229: 228: 190: 185: 163: 160: 159: 158: 117: 114: 113: 112: 86:non-free media 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2926: 2917: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2861:FAU Owls logo 2860: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2805: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2678: 2674: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2617: 2612: 2608: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2556: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2529: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2479: 2474: 2468: 2466: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2445: 2437: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2411: 2407: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2399: 2395: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2350: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2315: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2290: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2259: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2232: 2224: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2102: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2035: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1997: 1993: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1851: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1833: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1801: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1745: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1700:December 2013 1699: 1697: 1694: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1629: 1625: 1622: 1619: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1578: 1576: 1574: 1570: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1346: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1305: 1302: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1232: 1230: 1224: 1222: 1217: 1215: 1211: 1208: 1205: 1201: 1193: 1187: 1182: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1126: 1121: 1117: 1115: 1107: 1105: 1104: 1099: 1095: 1088: 1085: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1002: 1001: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 984: 980: 977: 976: 975: 974: 970: 966: 963: 962:from editing. 961: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 932: 929: 926: 923: 922: 921: 919: 914: 911: 907: 903: 899: 895: 881:December 2013 880: 876: 872: 868: 864: 863: 862: 861: 857: 853: 848: 845:. I see that 844: 840: 836: 829: 825: 821: 817: 813: 809: 805: 804: 803: 802: 798: 794: 789: 788: 784: 779: 777: 773: 765: 763: 762: 758: 754: 751:steamrolled. 747: 745: 741: 736: 730: 728: 721: 717: 713: 709: 708: 707: 706: 703: 700: 693: 688: 687: 678: 675: 671: 667: 663: 657: 653: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 627: 623: 619: 615: 611: 607: 606: 591:December 2013 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 571: 570: 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 548: 547: 546: 543: 540: 539: 530: 529: 523: 522: 521: 520: 517: 516: 507: 506: 497: 493: 491: 490: 487: 480: 473: 466: 458: 448: 444: 440: 435: 434: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 390: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 352: 351: 347: 343: 339: 336: 333: 330: 329: 324: 320: 316: 313: 309: 305: 304: 303: 302: 299: 295: 291: 287: 284: 281: 280: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 258: 257: 256: 255: 251: 247: 243: 242: 239: 236: 232: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 210: 209: 208: 204: 200: 195: 189: 186: 184: 183: 177: 176:a new message 170: 161: 157: 153: 149: 143: 138: 137: 136: 135: 131: 127: 123: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 83: 82: 81: 79: 75: 71: 65: 59: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2903: 2864: 2768: 2728:and release 2614: 2552: 2533:should work 2519: 2480: 2475: 2472: 2449: 2228: 2225:Wikistalking 2167:Andy Dingley 2033: 1989: 1943: 1905:Nhatlinh1704 1899:— Preceding 1894: 1861:Nhatlinh1704 1855:— Preceding 1850:Cut the Rope 1847: 1811:Nhatlinh1704 1805:— Preceding 1800:Cut the Rope 1797: 1792:Cut the Rope 1749:— Preceding 1741: 1720:Nathan121212 1706:Nathan121212 1703: 1692: 1690: 1670: 1633: 1630: 1626: 1623: 1620: 1617: 1582: 1569:89.243.23.66 1566: 1549: 1521:89.243.23.66 1514: 1487:89.243.23.66 1483: 1452:89.243.23.66 1449: 1422:89.243.23.66 1419: 1388:89.243.23.66 1385: 1364: 1350:2.100.37.249 1347: 1343: 1308: 1271:Andy Dingley 1266: 1236:Andy Dingley 1233: 1228: 1225: 1220: 1218: 1197: 1122: 1118: 1111: 1091: 1024:Andy Dingley 1022:that issue. 1019: 1015: 1011: 979:Andy Dingley 965:Andy Dingley 957: 935: 930: 924: 915: 906:disruptively 891: 832: 790: 780: 775: 769: 749: 732: 724: 698: 684: 682: 655: 618:edit warring 609: 603: 577:Andy Dingley 532: 528:freshacconci 527: 509: 505:freshacconci 504: 500: 484: 260:Morris Louis 244: 233: 230: 196: 192: 165: 119: 88:. I removed 66: 63: 55: 43: 37: 2907:versace1608 2312:go away. -- 1738:"Adore You" 1648:Please see 1114:Mark Arsten 902:collaborate 162:Whisperback 142:Parrotistic 126:Parrotistic 64:Greetings! 36:This is an 2882:WP:NFC#UUI 2611:WP:NFC#UUI 2456:FWiW Bzuk 2075:Ambisonics 1992:Ambisonics 1965:Black Kite 1691:The files 1585:Tom Danson 1181:SlimVirgin 1138:WP:NFC#UUI 1125:SlimVirgin 1108:One revert 1098:SlimVirgin 785:Category: 781:Template: 616:caused by 614:disruption 494:Images at 459:Thank you. 70:Правичност 2576:WP:NFCC#1 2361:WP:NFCC#9 2330:WP:NFCC#9 2326:this edit 2272:reports) 2270:WP:NFCC#9 2121:#1,3,8,9 2067:m:Mission 1654:WP:NFCC#3 1363:The term 1036:Actually 1020:precisely 942:consensus 938:talk page 908:, and to 699:AjaxSmack 634:consensus 632:and seek 626:Jeff Wall 612:for your 496:Jeff Wall 420:This edit 380:Chriscs26 342:Chriscs26 290:Chriscs26 246:Chriscs26 199:Chriscs26 174:You have 122:Clara Bow 2516:Question 2487:Xaris333 2199:Nettings 2106:Nettings 2053:Nettings 2039:Nettings 2001:Nettings 1913:contribs 1901:unsigned 1869:contribs 1857:unsigned 1819:contribs 1807:unsigned 1763:contribs 1751:unsigned 1267:dreadful 1214:Tweenies 987:WP:3RRNO 948:or seek 920:states: 894:edit war 793:Xaris333 753:Johnuniq 740:Johnuniq 654:|reason= 610:48 hours 477:You can 2886:Werieth 2827:Werieth 2804:Werieth 2734:Werieth 2726:WP:OTRS 2698:Werieth 2663:Werieth 2619:Werieth 2616:images. 2580:Werieth 2535:Werieth 2528:db-user 2502:Werieth 2429:WP:Dick 2415:Werieth 2410:WP:NFCC 2368:Werieth 2334:Werieth 2299:Werieth 2274:Werieth 2244:Werieth 2195:WP:NFCR 2181:Werieth 2131:Werieth 2127:WP:NFCR 2123:WP:NFCI 2119:WP:NFCC 2087:Werieth 2020:Werieth 1983:Use of 1969:Werieth 1926:Werieth 1882:Werieth 1835:Werieth 1794:article 1776:Werieth 1724:Werieth 1678:Werieth 1658:Werieth 1650:WP:NFCC 1635:Wozza20 1600:Werieth 1502:Werieth 1471:Werieth 1437:Werieth 1407:Werieth 1403:WP:NPOV 1373:Werieth 1369:WP:NPOV 1326:Werieth 1285:Werieth 1252:Werieth 1229:replace 1221:replace 1142:Werieth 1066:Werieth 1051:Werieth 991:Werieth 983:WP:DICK 960:blocked 958:may be 867:Werieth 852:Stefan2 839:WP:NFCC 808:Werieth 735:WP:NFCC 712:Werieth 664:first. 652:unblock 605:blocked 556:Werieth 439:Werieth 398:Werieth 364:Werieth 360:WP:NFCR 356:WP:NFCC 315:Werieth 312:WP:NFCR 308:WP:NFCC 268:Werieth 218:Werieth 214:WP:NFCC 172:Hello. 148:Werieth 102:Werieth 39:archive 2900:Zahara 2867:FAUowl 2823:WP:NFC 2083:WP:NFC 2079:WP:NFC 2016:WP:NFC 1961:WP:NFC 1551:C.Fred 1168:NOT3RR 1047:WP:CIR 573:WP:3RR 2433:evrik 2406:evrik 2398:evrik 2357:evrik 2349:evrik 2322:evrik 2314:evrik 2289:evrik 2266:evrik 2258:evrik 2240:evrik 2231:evrik 1311:Crtew 1087:WP:AN 791:Thx. 666:Bbb23 537:to me 514:to me 424:Sionk 16:< 2911:talk 2890:talk 2884:#14 2880:See 2871:talk 2845:talk 2831:talk 2813:talk 2795:talk 2776:talk 2752:talk 2738:talk 2716:talk 2702:talk 2688:talk 2667:talk 2653:talk 2639:talk 2623:talk 2598:talk 2584:talk 2562:talk 2539:talk 2506:talk 2491:talk 2460:talk 2419:talk 2372:talk 2338:talk 2303:talk 2278:talk 2248:talk 2203:talk 2185:talk 2171:talk 2135:talk 2110:talk 2091:talk 2057:talk 2043:talk 2024:talk 2005:talk 1973:talk 1950:talk 1930:talk 1909:talk 1886:talk 1865:talk 1839:talk 1815:talk 1780:talk 1759:talk 1728:talk 1710:talk 1682:talk 1662:talk 1639:talk 1604:talk 1589:talk 1573:talk 1556:talk 1525:talk 1506:talk 1491:talk 1475:talk 1456:talk 1441:talk 1426:talk 1411:talk 1401:See 1392:talk 1377:talk 1354:talk 1330:talk 1315:talk 1289:talk 1275:talk 1256:talk 1240:talk 1209:and 1202:(to 1200:this 1164:NFCC 1146:talk 1070:talk 1055:talk 1028:talk 995:talk 969:talk 871:talk 856:talk 826:and 812:talk 797:talk 757:talk 744:talk 716:talk 670:talk 581:talk 560:talk 534:talk 511:talk 443:talk 428:talk 402:talk 384:talk 368:talk 346:talk 319:talk 306:See 294:talk 272:talk 250:talk 222:talk 203:talk 152:talk 130:talk 106:talk 96:and 74:talk 2613:#1 2034:not 1946:XXN 1693:may 1618:Hi 1216:). 1160:NFC 1016:not 1012:not 624:at 2913:) 2892:) 2873:) 2847:) 2833:) 2815:) 2797:) 2778:) 2754:) 2740:) 2718:) 2704:) 2690:) 2669:) 2655:) 2641:) 2625:) 2600:) 2586:) 2564:) 2541:) 2531:}} 2525:{{ 2508:) 2493:) 2462:) 2421:) 2374:) 2347:-- 2340:) 2332:. 2305:) 2280:) 2250:) 2205:) 2187:) 2173:) 2137:) 2112:) 2093:) 2059:) 2045:) 2026:) 2007:) 1999:-- 1975:) 1952:) 1932:) 1915:) 1911:• 1888:) 1871:) 1867:• 1841:) 1821:) 1817:• 1782:) 1765:) 1761:• 1730:) 1712:) 1684:) 1664:) 1641:) 1606:) 1591:) 1575:) 1558:) 1527:) 1508:) 1493:) 1477:) 1469:. 1458:) 1443:) 1428:) 1413:) 1394:) 1379:) 1371:. 1356:) 1332:) 1317:) 1291:) 1277:) 1258:) 1242:) 1148:) 1072:) 1057:) 1030:) 997:) 971:) 873:) 858:) 850:-- 814:) 799:) 759:) 729:: 718:) 672:) 658:}} 650:{{ 583:) 562:) 445:) 430:) 404:) 386:) 370:) 348:) 321:) 296:) 274:) 252:) 224:) 205:) 154:) 132:) 108:) 92:, 80:) 76:) 2909:( 2888:( 2869:( 2843:( 2829:( 2811:( 2793:( 2774:( 2750:( 2736:( 2714:( 2700:( 2686:( 2665:( 2651:( 2637:( 2621:( 2596:( 2582:( 2560:( 2537:( 2504:( 2489:( 2483:m 2458:( 2417:( 2370:( 2336:( 2301:( 2276:( 2246:( 2201:( 2183:( 2169:( 2133:( 2108:( 2089:( 2055:( 2041:( 2022:( 2003:( 1971:( 1948:( 1928:( 1907:( 1884:( 1863:( 1837:( 1813:( 1778:( 1757:( 1726:( 1708:( 1680:( 1660:( 1637:( 1602:( 1587:( 1571:( 1554:( 1523:( 1504:( 1489:( 1473:( 1454:( 1439:( 1424:( 1409:( 1390:( 1375:( 1352:( 1328:( 1313:( 1287:( 1273:( 1254:( 1238:( 1144:( 1136:( 1068:( 1053:( 1026:( 993:( 967:( 869:( 854:( 810:( 795:( 755:( 742:( 714:( 668:( 579:( 558:( 474:. 441:( 426:( 400:( 382:( 366:( 344:( 317:( 292:( 270:( 248:( 220:( 201:( 150:( 144:: 140:@ 128:( 104:( 72:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index