User talk:Werieth/201405

65:

ask something like "How can You be sure of this ?" or whatever. I think that an information page just for plasible or possible donators may be of help. Please don't take this as me being lazy. I just know that in Sweden , peple often want to see things at paper whatever a sales man ever is saying. I can take myself as an example - a female sales man phoned me about an offer that sounder fair and OK. (It was someting about digital cable-television) And they usually do tape the calls. But I said approx. "It sounds OK, but I always want to read the small letters before I can agree to Your offer", and asked her to mail me the entire contract physically. But this she "couldn't do" (probably due to her pay-check is depending entirelly on the number of contracts she sells by phone only), and I told her "that's the only way" but she still "coul not do that". So I'm still using analogue cable-TV. I only say that an informational page for possible photo donators could make a difference. All the best

3108:. In a lot of cases including 1 sample for an album (a total of 2 non-free media) isn't going to be challenged that often. In this case there where 4 samples being used, We have 4 samples, album cover, and TV promo which is three times that of a normal album. Given that there really isn't anything particularly different about this one, the extra justification for including the extra media isn't there. Given the one sample has its own article removing it from this one article isn't that big of a deal. As for the other sample, the article just doesn't have enough to support it. As for the TV promo nothing in the image that is being displayed is discussed. Yes the TV special happened but we don't need to include a picture to establish that. Given we have text and sources what else does that TV image provide other than evidence that the special happened? 2690:. The whole point of me uploading those 2 pictures under "Production" was to help people understand how the production was accomplished. By showing the actors in the monster suits and the filming of the Octopus sequence. This was done to showcase how this film was made showing two separate effects techniques something that transcends a basic description in text. This is why I didn't use a stock shoot or a simple still from the film but rather behind the scenes shots of its production. The comicbook cover was to help people understand an example of how this film had a legacy and the American poster was to show the poster art for the American version of the film which is more prevalent in the English language speaking world than the Japanese poster. It doesn't fail 2931:

even think are absurd, are normal to them, and they get so deep entrenched into that bureaucracy that they totally loose touch with how other people not entrenched in it see things. There are 100s of rules on this thing and most people who contribute learn as they go and don't have time to read them all. In future it would serve the mission you claim to care about far better to fire out a quick explanation when you pull someones work instead of saying nothing, leaving them with no idea what was going on, then threatening them when they failed to read your mind. I've seen this happen a lot since I started contributing it turns people off in a huge way and makes the wider public loose respect for the project.

1741:

archive.is link as part of the vandalism) Revision 2. User B makes an innocent typo fix without catching the vandalism (Revision 3). User C sees vandalism and tries to restore revision 1, but cant due to the archive.is spam. User C then must manually look for and remove all links to archive.is before the vandalism in Foo can be removed. During that window who knows what kind of vandalism may be present. Also if you continue to be obnoxious on my talk page, use that type of language and persist in your harassment Ill just ban you from my talk page.

932:. It seems that you have an interest in preventing linkrot - thanks for that; it takes a lot of time and care to do that sort of work. I have a question though -- I am wondering why you tagged pretty much every New York Times citation with "dead link". I checked each one of them, and they are not dead, so I removed the tag. Can you please explain why you tagged them as dead? I cite the NY Times a lot, since it is a paper of record, and I have not heard of problems with citations to it before. Thanks! 2926:

another, my intent was to work within the rules. If you are going to level over the top threats at people who spend hours contributing because they make a single mistake, then explain your reasoning first in plain english to them. 4 letters beside the line in the edit is not much of an explanation to someone new to the project, you have to look at things from the perspective of someone who does not already know everything. If you had typed out a quick explanation on the talk page

31: 1510:

done in secrecy, if I recall correctly there was even a watchlist notice about it. Sites that ignore robots.txt are nasty. Ive often seen reports of spiders and other crawlers which failed to abide by good internet practices causing serious disruptions to sites. Just because you are unaware of the bigger issues doesnt mean that they dont exist. To get to the point where you cannot add archive.is URLs isnt something that happens easily.

3276: 3836: 1300: 1726:

more time replying to me than fixing the damage you caused, instead focusing on just spreading the damage in spite of hte protests of several editors. Then you have the bare-faced cheek to call the warning you received invalid, kind of like the thug the cops are holding down exclaiming he has done nothing wrong. Fix the articles you have broken, or I shall assume you have forgotten and remind you as needed.

1138:. Do not remove them unless you replace them. I hope you can see that this is a fair statement and a compromise. I like the improvements you made to Tintin (character), creating new archives using webarchive. I suppose someday I will re-archive all the links in The Adventures of Tintin using webarchive. But until then, please revert your edits to both articles, keeping the improvements you made. Thanks. 2640:

no free media alternatives. They were shrunk down or degraded to make sure they don't violate the commercialbility of the pictures. They give visual representations of the production so people can understand how the film was made better than simple text. They have been published before by the copyright holders. The copyright holders are stated in the fair use rationale. What exactly is the problem?

3046:

second sample can be justified as its the album's lead single and title track, which is also critically discussed and important to the article. It's also used on its own page but it still meets the criteria for usage on this one as well. The image is a logo for a televised special for the album which is thoroughly discussed in the Promotion section. The guidelines state logos are acceptable NFC.

3085:

understandable, however I've seen many articles use audio samples of singles with their own pages on the album pages as well without any removal, which is why I was questioning it in this particular case. It was also critically discussed and part of the album's overall subject matter. I don't dislike the policy but am just questioning the reasoning since they all seem to fit the guidelines.

2218: 986: 734: 3123:

sentences there don't seem to fall short of the criteria (one describing its production and the other its lyrics), but I was asking your advice on it. For the other sample, I understand it has its own article and that's fine. I only questioned it since there are numerous album articles which include samples of songs with their own pages that don't get removed, such as

853: 773: 3855:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 1096:

changed to the single-space " ". Both of these "housekeeping" changes are not true contributions to the article in my opinion; it just raises eyebrows; I try to never make that kind of null change to an article (i.e., when using AWB) as people just contact me asking me why I thought it was necessary. I see all this has been done to the

372:'s exemptions for NFCC. I am giving you a friendly caution as a fellow NFC tracker to prevent someone else taking this to 3RR or ANI. (Yes, the reverting editor too will be cautioned if they revert too, but I'm very aware that others have taken you to ANI before several times and you may be blocked if they take it there again). -- 2930:

then I'd not have reverted, but instead you yanked them without saying anything. I've seen it happen to people in bureaucracy before, and Wikipedias just an electronic bureaucracy in many ways, where they become so ingrained in it that the rules that don't make sense to outsiders, that some outsiders

2639:

What do you mean by critical commentary exactly? When I uploaded those pictures years ago I asked around to make sure they were valid and even had help by other administrators when it came to how to tag the pictures. I was assured they were OK and don't violate any of the policy guidelines. There are

2000:

I can understand your reluctance to visit them, and personally, I do know that their addition is now blocked; but please bear in mind that many of us are completely unaware of discussions about unacceptable archives. Where you do have to leave content newly unsourced, please would you tag it as such,

1821:

I just noticed that most of the links where not actually being used in references (which was the only place I was looking for replacements) Ive gone ahead and re-checked for any usage of a cite template not in a reference and filled those in. I dont know of any bulk tools for requesting archive but I

1740:

Just because you cannot understand the issues, and dont care to try, doesnt mean that it doesnt exist. One prime example where archive.is links make reverting vandalism difficult is where Page Foo is stable at revision 1 user A vandalizes the page and in the process adds something obscene (removing a

1509:

Actually archive.is is an abusive site that violates copyright, has used unapproved bots, countless sockpuppets and a history of abusive behavior to force links to their site into en.wikipedia. Removing abusive content improves the article, as a dead link is better than an abusive link. The RfC wasnt

1494:

Archive.is is blocked because an RFC was conducted in relative secrecy, not because the site is flawed. Archive.org respects robots.txt and abandons snapshots if website policies change and it doesn't archive PDFs, webcite was on the verge of shutting down in recent memory. You did not finish the job

99:

Thanks. (You were quick indeed, I noticed some horrible spelling errors. And was about save corrections. When wrighting articles I always use a dictionary, but not always at talk pages) But I assume You got my general idea, anyway. They way a discussion is taking, is of cource not possible to know in

3084:

The special is notable to the album's promotion, and is the main critical focus of the promotion section. Shouldn't that warrant its inclusion? There are two sentences for the song regarding the audio sample, what else do you think it would need to be included? For the other sample, I suppose that's

2925:

I'd further remind you that when you deleted them the first time you left no explanation on the talk page why, so for all I knew someone was messing around pulling them when I posted them. I had absolutely no idea I'd broken the rules. Common sense told me if they were ok on one page they're ok on

2905:

Its far more effective to explain things to people than to use automated stencils composed of legalese and then threaten them. I just took a page that was a total and absolute mess some thought should be a candidate for deletion and turned it around completely spending hours working on it, and made

2433:

Same license this one is under. It wasn't a problem, because all stations are part of the same network, umbrella'd under West Virginia Public Broadcasting. Also, because, if memory serves, someone had uploaded the image 11 times....one for each page. Wasn't a problem then, won't be a problem now.

2140:

The outcome of the RfC is removal of those links, you may not like the outcome but you need to abide by it. Calling my actions spam is a personal attack. I am not promoting anything. I am using a know, stable, and dependable archiving service which is already in widespread usage. I just looked a few

1710:

Actually using abuse language borderline NPA. After a user has removed something from their talk page you cannot edit war to keep it there, I have every right to remove invalid warnings which that was. Per the RfC all links need removed. Existing links can be problematic depending on what happens to

1411:

Also, the shoulder board insignia used do not seem to have been created by the crown. This is the same with all the other rank insignia displayed on Knowledge for the Canadian Forces. Therefore, would it not make sense to have the Canadian flag officer shoulder boards appear on Knowledge, or, beause

1170:

Really? As I said, I heard that I had unfortunately made the wrong choice of archive mechanism on about one hundred archives in these articles last December, but can no one point me to the consensus of the powers-that-be of Knowledge that explains that, above all, they must be removed? I would think

2418:

I cant see what license the previous logo was under, but if it was below ToO and wasnt copyrightable this wouldnt be an issue. Since the file is non-free that is where the issue is. In this case linking to the primary entity and noting that they have the same logo is enough, we dont need to display

544:

If it was just a substandard link I wouldn't be removing it. These links where added and created after the site died, we have zero credibility that they actually contain the original material. These where added by two spammers late last year that slipped through the cracks. Due to the fact that the

64:

Hello again and sorry to bother You this soon again. I hope You did accept my appology of the word combination "Bertil Persson, old photographer and insult" it just became an unlucky formulation. But I've been thinking of the "sales man"-issue and persuation. It just hit me, that the archivists may

3122:

For the first sample, it includes two sentences of commentary regarding it. That's why I questioned what else would be necessary to include the sample, since I've seen other articles using up to four audio samples without removal, each with only one or two sentences of commentary per song. The two

2957:

Normally when someone removes material citing a policy you dont re-add it unless you understand the policy. In this case I had to remove it multiple times. Since you obviously where not getting the point I had to do something that would make you get the point. Honestly in regards to non-free media

2155:

Mass-addition of links to replace an opposing set of links is SPAM, you can dress it up as you want. It's vandalism, as is removing archives outright and not replacing them and changing all the date formats in violation of MOS NUM, you've improved those articles in a negative way AND left work for

2052:

I dont have links to the discussions at hand, I dont know if it was true then or is still true, given the abusive nature of how these links where added it doesnt make that much of a difference. It just means I dont want to click the links. As for Archive.org having malware, virustotal is mistaken.

1725:

No they can't be problematic. You have no idea about anything related to this, the only problem is putting them back once some lazy editor does a drive-by edit that leaves a bunch of references without an archive. Until that happens, there is no issue editing or reverting the article. You've spent

1233:

I see. My final comment is to quote a statement made in that decision: "To those removing Archive.is from articles, please be sure to make very clear A) why the community made this decision and B) what alternatives are available to them to deal with rotlink." Your edit summary was non-existent. I

415:

Completely agree the editor is ready to ignore NFC policies, but there is still the fact that there's no "obvious" NFC violations that would fall under 3RR, and others that have been critical of your NFC enforcing before would likely jump at this opportunity. I will warn them right now that NFC is

2910:

mistake. One mistake. The author does not care (in fact they're both dead...), so there is no need to be so overzealous. You won't get more people contributing by leveling threats at them when they make an honest mistake. Whatever good you think these ridiculous and inane rules do for the Wiki

2125:

I added every single link on those pages you affected. So your excuses still fall on deaf ears. Funny how you spamming articles with your preferential archiving site which fails at its most basic job of providing archives is not considered spam though. While leaving multiple sources archive-less.

584:

Why did you remove the external link to 3dvieweronline considering it as spam? I am using that service quite often and honestly is way better than step3d.com here listed as supports step with its relative product tree, step is not only just geometry but much much more. If there is a good (free of

315:

What information otherwise a company page would have? On the wikipedia page of a brand which has been pioneer in water purification technology and is getting patents for that, if the simple information about the technology or the names of different models can't be updated then what benefit a user

3045:

There are two references mentioning it, one including critical commentary and the other a quote from the artist. There is no rule per the NFC guidelines which states only one sample per section can be used; there are many album pages which use multiple samples within the composition section. The

2719:

isn't a particularly helpful edit summary for people who don't regularly engage in discussions on non-free content. Just to clarify, do you object on the grounds of this - "Excessive quantities of short audio clips in a single article. A small number may be appropriate if each is accompanied by

1100:

article too, which I also heavily contributed to. Housekeeping aside, my question was: Please point me to the concensus that Archive.is must not only not be added to articles, but must also be removed from existing articles. (It was a lot of work to add all those archives and I wish I had used a

947:

Just looks like a transient issue. It could have been several factors that caused it to show up as dead when I checked it, but actually still be alive. Since its been a few hours Im unable to recreate the the circumstances which caused me to tag it. If a link becomes alive after it was tagged as

3306:

Werieth, ive been looking through your contribs and talk page archives. It seems you are quite a deletionist in your Non-free media usage. Beyond the mission statement of WMF which you already shared with me previously, what motivates you? Or perhaps a better question is: what is your end game?

2870:

AGAIN...that still makes no sense to me. If an image is ok on one page by copyright rules why would it be banned on another page...the link provided to the policy does not explain this. Furthermore, I fail to understand why any author or content owner would object to something that effectively

1095:

I see what you mean about the template redirect; it surprises me that the original authors of the template spelled it as they did; I have always used lower-case on all my template calls. For your second change, I was referring to your change of every occurrence of the double-space " " has been

3201:

isnt a valid argument, my suggestion from above is to write a good article, if a sound clip is needed to explain a point or points it may be used, but we dont include examples just to include them. Also if possible try to select a sample that combines multiple points you are trying to cover if

2988:

Each of the files used includes critical commentary. The first is an audio sample which is discussed within its composition section. The second is a logo for a televised special for the album which was essential to its promotion, discussed in the Promotion section. The third was a cover of its

1695:

And while nothing I have done falls under NPA, threatening to get me blocked for issuing a valid warning, IS a violation of NPA. Not that I can be blocked for issuing a valid warning, just letting you know that you do not know how to implement Knowledge policy nor threaten others with it in an

83:

is one place to start, but without knowing the specific objections and what direction the discussion is going its hard to provide one page with all the needed information. I could point you to quite a few different links but the odds are it would be information overload as 80% of the material

1578:

Archive sites which respect robots.txt and thus abandon snapshots are useless, they're no different than a site dying which defeats the point of archiving. This has just happened with gamespot refs and archive.org. A bot or user inserting links to archive.is is no different than you forcing

316:

will get on reaching to that page. Nowhere the page content was promoting the purifier models. Pls look into it, rather removing the whole content, would appreciate if certain objectionable words are removed so that correct info of the company can be visible on the wikipedia page. Thanks

256:"The logic of having a wikipedia page" is to provide readers information about the topic of the page. So a brand page, it must be hving information about what the brand is about, its products, awards, facility technology etc. This is what a user seeks when opening wikipedia page. Thanks 1551:

I didnt change the formatting of any exiting dates. I followed a process of removal of archive.is cruft, and then searching webcitation and then followed by archive.org for a copy of any link in the article. If an archive is found I add it and the archivedate too. In some templates like

3375:. Im getting tired of your edit warring and refusal to abide by policy. If you really want to push it NFCC enforcement is exempt from 3RR, I dont want to go down that road, but it is there. If you want to discuss it we can do that, however the media needs to stay out until then. 1801:

Werieth, is there a way to automatically create acceptable web archives, such as on webarchive.org? I notice many of the articles involved in your purge of archive.is had their archives replaced with webarchive.org, and I assume you are using a tool to achieve that. The

585:

course) service about step visualisation other than the very basic mentioned I believe should be mentioned as many people can be interested in! Otherwise please explain the criteria you apply to judge the validity of such external links.Thanks. Looking for a response.

3183:

In that case, can you explain what it would potentially need for inclusion? I don't mean to ask again but as I said before, I'm only asking based on other articles which use the same amount of support for two, or sometimes more samples in the composition section.

3501:. The covers are visually similar and there is zero critical commentary on the art of the cover. NFCC allows for 1 image per album for visual identification (IE infobox usage) any additional images must have critical commentary about the art of the cover itself. 1080:

The SfnRef was just bypassing template redirects, just some minor housekeeping. As for the spacing can you give a little more detail as Im not sure what you are referring to. As for archive.is the links shouldnt be kept as they are problematic in several fronts.

1605:

removing perfectly functioning archives and leaving sources unprotected. Noone has asked you to do this and your talk page is littered with people telling you to knock it off, so knock it the fuck off or finish the job, you're vandalising the god damn articles.

3481:

The image of an alternate album cover was uploaded by another user several years ago and is used in an infobox for an album's re-release, which is critically described and also has a separate track listing. It seems to meet the criteria for inclusion there.

218:

Why you are removing the content of the Kent RO Knowledge page? The last revision was in no way any advert but basic information about the brand. This is totally unacceptable and goes against the logic of having a wikipedia page. Looking for a response.

1538:. What I don't get is why you changed the correct format for the dates in the references, not respecting the (hidden) "Use dmy format" category for the article, turning them into a "yyyy-mm-dd". By the way, it would be helpful if you use edit summaries.-- 1115:

I wasnt aware I made the spacing change, Ill be more careful. As for using archive.is the links should be removed and replaced if possible. Given the filters in place and the problems having archive.is in articles cause removal is really the only option.

2527:

article. I was so mentally exhausted after finishing it (it took me about a month or so to write) that I just didn't have the energy to do that. I deeply appreciate your efforts; the article is definitely better today, because of your work. Cheers! -

1955:. In most cases I am able to replace it and even end up adding a few more links to archives that help prevent link rot. Archive.is has been blocked from being added to articles, and does cause issues in some cases when trying to revert some edits. 1876: 2838:

How is it that it's ok to use the book jackets on one wiki peage and not the other? That does not make sense to me. If you want to remove stuff explain your rationale on the talk page, don't just go yanking it without explanation.

2655:

It doesnt matter what the copyright holder wants. Knowledge's mission is to provide free content, there is an understanding that some topics require non-free media in order to cover it. To that point Knowledge requires minimal usage

2472:

I'm not too worried about being caught. As for whether the image is copyrightable, I have no clue. There wasn't a little C or R or TM beside it when I saved it, so I don't think so, but I can't say for certain. Hence why I used

1950:

Given the issues archive.is has had including at one point supposedly having malware, Im not visiting any of the links to it. If the reference has an original url I do look in both archive.org and WebCite for an archived copy.

2350:

That doesnt mean we need to include it, including a link to the parent company article where the logo is displayed is all that is needed, If the sub-entity doesnt have its own logo we dont need to substitute the parents logo.

1840:

articles with archives to web.archive.org. There won't be any link rot on those articles. And there isn't a tool; you did it all manually? That had to be around 150 links. I remember doing it. Hey, good luck to you and

2871:

provides free marketing and promotion of their material, they'd have to be a complete moron to object to that. If the rules on here are this contradictory and inconsistent I don't know how any decent content gets produced.

2087:

They weren't added abusively, you've affected TWO articles under my watch and I added them ALL! These were not under the discussion, you've just messed the articles up. You can STOP your abusive editing any time now.

2808: 1457:

You've removed a bunch of reference archives and replaced the rest with an inferior archiving site, and your actions have prevented the previous archives being restored. Finish the job if you're going to start it.

3068:

NFCC states that usage of a logo on the article about the subject is acceptable. In this case the TV special isnt notable enough for its own article and thus inclusion is not allowed. One sentence dosnt meet

3099:

The production may be notable enough to include in the article, but it falls far short of what is needed to include additional non-free media. With regards to the samples your perspective is wrong, its not

1982:

please use the edit summary. You are required to, as stated in the decision at the archive.is RFC, and there is no excuse for you to repeatedly cause so much confusion by not doing so, as documented above.

4007:

Thank you. I presented some evidence that FLGov does apply on the conversation you linked above if you care to take a look at it. I have some other things that back it up too if that isn't enough. -

3081:

states that if a file can be replaced it should be (In this case with a link to the article on the song itself which also includes the sample). Im sorry if you dislike the policy but it is policy.

2365:

You're not understanding. The same logo is used for their radio division and their television division. This wasn't a problem before with the previous logo, so I don't see it being a problem now.

1822:

know that webcitation.org allows you archive somewhere around 100 links before it starts throttling you. If you want me to look at an article to see if there are already archives just let me know.

1562:

the formatting is handled in the template itself, otherwise I just used my standard formatting. I know there are bots that will come around and correct it if I happen to use the wrong date format.

1579:

archive.org and webcitation links in there, the only difference is that archive.is does what is needed and the others do not. And you still haven't added archives for the sources you diminished.

286:

the section is full of unsourced, unscientific buzz words, which look lifted from their sales brochure. Given your obvious ties with the company it would be best if you didnt edit that article.

2454:

It was a matter of the problem not being caught, not that it doesnt exist. Before this goest too far down the road you might look and see if the file is copyrightable, I dont think it is, see

1059:

Hi Werieth. I see you have taken it upon yourself to remove all the archive.is archived references (as well as changing all double-spacing to single-spacing, and changing sfnref to SfnRef) in

1248:

This is KWW's personal bug that he has inflicted on the community through a non-neutral RFC, and that Werieth is enforcing without explanation or discussion leaving only damage in his wake.

368:- I am 100% in agreement that the images are not necessary on the article but that is a very subjective call, and thus revert warring in this specific case is one of those not covered under 2819:. The nomination also needs an image/media review, so if that's more up your alley than a formal review, it'd be greatly appreciated too. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! 1806:

articles I mention above mostly did not have their archives replaced with webarchive.org, though. I'm asking since I am being forced to consider doing it all manually all over again.

1644:

There is no personal attack, I am asking, seriously, what your malfunction is. These links are not forbidden and were not added by a bot. You have no excuse for what you are doing.

1408:

With this logic, no representation of Canadian Forces rank insignia would be able to be displayed on Knowledge. However, all other rank insignia images do not have this statement.

1065:. I understand the recent decisions regarding archive.is, but can you tell me if it is a requirement to remove it from existing articles? What about the other changes? Thank-you. 342:. If you want to include the material you need to do it in a non-promotional, encyclopedic method. Often a list of awards is just cruft, and listing brands/products falls afoul of 2141:

things up. At archive.is's peak it had 14,000 links. archive.org has just under 590,000 links. Which shows about a 2% of the market. Using such a widespread tool isnt spamming.

1435: 3280: 282:. Knowledge isnt a location to promote a business or product, thus we dont need to go into products unless they are notable, in this case its a fairly common product. As for 655:

I don't quite get this; my guess is that &M is treated as the start of a special character, although I would think "Texas A&M" would be a common usage (and it is).

2109:

you must not be aware of the history, the fact that open proxies, mass link campaigns, and probable bot nets are involved in a good percentage of links that where added.

1292:. I understand that Knowledge wishes to have free images, and this makes sense to me. I have noticed this licensing information with the flag officer shoulder boards: 3106:

OK I have a good article and I'm trying to describe/cover something in the text, but I'm falling short and including a piece of non-free media will allow me to do that

737:

Files are no longer missing non-free use rationale's for this article as it was added to "Territorial Cup" which redirects to Arizona-Arizona State football rivalry.--

2890:. Knowledge's policy on non-free media is complex, but that page does limit the usage of non-free media to specific cases, and is far more strict than copyright law. 1681:

They cause issue adding htem now, the existing links do not cause any trouble, I should know considering how many edits I've made to both articles you've vandalised.

3916: 3307:

Keeping WP from legal action? Enable greater distribution of WP copy/text in venues that would be difficult with non-free media? Please help me understand. Thanks.

3127:

one as a random example. It was just an observation that some get to remain there while others don't, even though they use the same amount of critical commentary.

2247: 2564:

Sorry about that. I had planned on fixing it eventually myself, but I've had some other demands on my time and haven't been able to get to it. Thanks again. -

468: 3560:

There still isnt any critical commentary of the visual elements of the re-issue. Just because we discuss the re-issue doesn't mean we need to show the cover.

522:. I have no objection to removing the archive URLs in templates but I'd rather have a substandard archive link than a 404 for references which are bare urls. 2989:

re-release, which includes commentary and is significant to its release. These all meet the criteria of NFC and can be included within the article. Regards,

2934:

People should feel welcome and editors and more experienced contributors should help them understand the rules instead of threatening them when they don't.

2735:

Thats part of it. Those sound clips are already being used in their primary article (WP:NFCC#3]]), and its basically being used to list samples which fails

464: 2858: 397:

I know Ive only made one revert. If the user continues the obnoxious edit summaries and to ignore NFCC Ill escalate this as necessary. Edit summaries like

3546:

source calls the cover photo "totally different" and gives an in-depth review of the reissue. Can it be included using new citations from this reference?

2020: 2242: 1288:

I hope that you are doing well. If I am not mistaken, I have noticed that you are the one responsible for removing the flag officer shoulder boards from

1845:

on the removal tool I see being discussed. I assume it will replace, not remove the archives. I want you both to know I personally think you two are

2316:

We dont include a parent logo, in a child article if the child doesnt have its own logo. Including this file on 11 other articles isnt minimal usage.

452: 80: 2292: 3141:

That was me trying to not be a dick and remove everything, There is potential for a clip but more than that just isnt justifiable at this point.

3867: 2550:

No big deal. When I saw that reflist I cringed at how much was duplicated, (348 before to 168 after) I had to spend a minute or two fixing it.

2024: 3232: 1333:

it is known that the representation of this symbol is either copyrighted by the holder of the symbol or is not available under a free licence

448: 3920: 3771: 3016: 2028: 401:

are not only misleading, but show a distinct failure to understand policy. Such behavior if continued will be taken to either ANI or NFCR.

3961: 3798:

template does nothing in that context. It's stuff that clutters and complicates the edit-screen. There is a dedicated parameter called "

1439: 3328:

to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally

3371:

Actually the next time you re-add it in violation of wikipedia policy I am going to request you be blocked for repeated violations of

1375: 1289: 1279: 323: 263: 226: 2620: 2395: 1921: 586: 1665:

Try adding new archive.is links to an article, you cant. these links are causing problems when editors attempt to edit an article.

1928:

tagging the relevant content as unreferenced. Further, why you made this sort of edit without even using an edit summary? Thanks,

3584:

Hey there, what caught my attention while looking through the page history was you using rollback in a content dispute like with

441:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

189:

If and only if each individual event is notable, and has their own article. In this case that is not valid, thus it falls under

2939: 2916: 2876: 2854: 1524:

Following the same reasoning, I understand the changes regarding archive.is and the bypass of redirects for templates, such as

169:

But it also says that if each event has a different logo (which each HH PPV does), it's permissible to have an image for each.

3529:

No, as the cover isnt notable. I doubt you can find reliable third party sources that discuss the cover art in that version.

3250:

The files are not from commons or I wouldnt have removed them. They are non-free and subject to our policy on non-free media

2196:

template can you set the date format to the one the article is in as we are getting month first dates in day first articles.

1010: 445:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1917: 1916:

Hello. I'm aware that the use of archive.is isn't desirable, but I'd be interested to know why you removed links to it from

1480:

I did, archive.is blocked for a reason. Webcitation and archive.org are the two most reliable archiving sources on the net.

661:

I've fixed it, but letting you know in case you care, or have insights why it doesn't work with the first code listed above.

2842:

New people are not going to learn the rules of the system if you just pull things without explaining why they are not ok.

3984: 3901: 2694:

either because there is no non-free equivalent. You're stating these files violate rules when I showed they simply do not.

3735: 1836:

I'm amazed; thank-you Werieth; I carefully checked, and you have replaced every single one of the external links of the

1535: 3847: 3235:? I got them from Commons (though for the life of me I can't find them again!) so thought they were free use. Cheers... 1234:

wish you hadn't confused me so much today with your sweeping edits. I suppose you really do have to "be more careful."

4020: 3950: 3851:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3756: 3695: 3169:

No, right now the article really cannot even support the one I left, adding additional media shouldn't be considered.

1973: 692:

Wow, quick response, I hope you looked at the underlying code, I can't get it to display properly, even using nowiki.

3717:

I standardized all of the date formats within the whole article. We dont need to use a template to format the date.

104:, which essentially may give the "donators" a brief information, and that there are advantages in it also for them. 3856: 2952: 2935: 2912: 2872: 2850: 2613:

don't change again korinthos fc logos. i am from korinthos city i know better which is the new and the old logos.

2157: 2127: 2089: 1782: 1727: 1697: 1682: 1645: 1607: 1580: 1496: 1459: 1387: 1249: 38: 3323: 3330:

Providing a balance of non-free media is key to that, and ensuring that the content is appropriate is also key.

3015:

has 1 sentence referencing it. Given there is already a sample in that section this usage cannot be justified.

2758: 2699: 2645: 2586: 1420: 1219:

That was just one of the results discussed in the RfC. However when the RfC was closed that wasnt the outcome.

1202: 1134:, and I am pleased you started doing the work to do so on Tintin (character), but I won't go along with simply 1061: 442: 2032: 3788:

Please don't get all uppity. It's a recent change to the script that I have since removed. In any event, the

1849:

to archive.is, but I respect the consensus. Good luck on it, and thanks again for replacing those archives.

1203:

Knowledge:Archive.is RFC#4. Replace bot-added archive.is links where possible, leave human-added links intact

3760: 3699: 1443: 877:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

798:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

742: 631: 616: 3023:

isnt needed/nothing in the visuals of that screenshot are being discussed. In summary, the files dont meet

3020: 590: 3988: 3980: 3905: 3897: 3633: 3597: 3284: 3240: 3012: 2812: 2491: 2477: 2442: 2406: 2338: 2303: 2277: 1778: 1381: 1045: 327: 267: 230: 2047: 3924: 3814: 3326:

you will see that Ive uploaded over 300 non-free files. My end game is the core principle of wikipedia,

2624: 2104: 2053:

Archive.org to my knowledge has never been compromised. Given the outcome of the RfC removal is needed.

1660: 1475: 460: 3279:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at

3155:

Ok. For the second one I'll add another sentence of commentary for it. Would that make it acceptable?

2190: 1556: 3466: 3410: 3355: 3312: 3292: 3198: 2846: 2616: 1897: 910: 841: 698: 667: 559:

Ok. In that case removing the links as references seems better (which is what I mostly did on HoET).

339: 319: 259: 222: 120: 3792: 3661: 2958:

the author has zero say in how we decide to use the the work. Knowledge's policy on non-free media

2695: 2641: 2569: 2533: 2076: 1988: 1854: 1811: 1416: 1239: 1210: 1176: 1143: 1106: 1070: 828:[http://books.google.com/books?id=dAYYAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA286&dq=Scipione+Vannutelli&hl=en#v= 786: 109: 70: 2775:

It all depends on how the article is changed as to whether or not it could support the inclusion.

1305:

This is a representation of a government, military, regimental, family, or other symbol such as a

1101:

different archive mechanism, but at least the articles were archived, until your change.) Thanks.

3589: 3551: 3520: 3487: 3189: 3160: 3132: 3090: 3051: 2994: 2928:

Book jackets and dvd covers can only be used in the article about them, see full policy here: XYZ

2766: 2725: 2006: 1933: 1097: 738: 177: 2820: 897:

This coy approach by the writers infuriated viewers, but they remained entranced by the pairing.

3996: 3969: 3931: 3875: 3779: 3722: 3629: 3619: 3606: 3593: 3565: 3534: 3506: 3438: 3424: 3394: 3380: 3335: 3259: 3236: 3174: 3146: 3113: 3032: 2971: 2895: 2780: 2744: 2673: 2594: 2555: 2485: 2463: 2436: 2424: 2400: 2356: 2332: 2321: 2297: 2273: 2222: 2201: 2146: 2114: 2058: 1960: 1827: 1746: 1716: 1670: 1629: 1567: 1515: 1485: 1224: 1121: 1086: 1041: 990: 953: 761: 713: 683: 564: 550: 527: 504: 406: 351: 291: 246: 198: 159: 127: 89: 47: 17: 3805: 2736: 2234: 1540: 1322: 967: 937: 343: 190: 147: 2382:

Just to note, the pages for TV stations associated with West Virginia Public Broadcasting (

2229:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

997:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

812:[[Image:Maria Stuarda si avvia al patibolo.jpg|thumb|''Mary Stuart walks to the Scaffold'' 4016: 3946: 3752: 3738:. Why are you taking them out of the article? Have you taken them out of others as well? — 3691: 3462: 3406: 3366: 3351: 3308: 3288: 2824: 1891: 1015: 906: 902: 891:

in a promotional commercial used to entice viewers during the couple's reign of ambiguity.

857: 837: 833: 777: 693: 662: 424: 380: 2523:

Thank you very much for your recent work in fixing and combining the references for the

1495:

as those links now have no archive, you've made the article worse through your actions.

752:

It doesnt matter if there is a template on the file page or not, that usage doesnt meet

3893: 3498: 3372: 3251: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3024: 2959: 2816: 2691: 2687: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2580: 2565: 2545: 2529: 2265: 2161: 2131: 2093: 2072: 1984: 1850: 1807: 1786: 1774: 1731: 1701: 1686: 1649: 1611: 1584: 1500: 1463: 1253: 1235: 1206: 1172: 1171:

if it was that critical someone would have removed them all by now with a bot. Thanks.

1153: 1139: 1102: 1066: 1033: 1002: 753: 143: 105: 66: 2001:

and use the edit summary to give the rest of us an idea of what you're up to. Thanks,

1335:. There may also be other restrictions on reproduction, including but not limited to 3671: 3547: 3516: 3483: 3347: 3185: 3156: 3128: 3086: 3047: 3006: 2990: 2762: 2721: 2002: 1945: 1929: 1621: 1528: 1310: 1190: 1161: 1156:, it's more like "replace them if you can, but always, no matter what, remove them."— 495:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

369: 279: 172: 151: 2757:

the page had reliable sourced content attesting to their specific importance to the

545:

contents of those links didnt come from the original source they shouldn't be used.

399:

I have seen it. Wonderful place. I'm thinking of holidaying there during the summer.

3992: 3965: 3871: 3852: 3775: 3718: 3615: 3561: 3530: 3502: 3434: 3420: 3390: 3376: 3331: 3255: 3170: 3142: 3124: 3109: 3028: 2967: 2962:

is fairly strict. Please note that edits on the talk page are not needed, I left a

2891: 2776: 2740: 2669: 2590: 2551: 2524: 2459: 2420: 2352: 2330:

The "Parent" logo is also used for their radio division. It's an umbrella logo. -

2317: 2197: 2142: 2110: 2054: 1956: 1823: 1742: 1712: 1666: 1625: 1563: 1511: 1481: 1370: 1318: 1220: 1185:

I got busy in real life, and am just getting to implementation of the removal bot.—

1117: 1082: 949: 757: 709: 679: 560: 546: 539: 523: 500: 496: 402: 347: 287: 242: 194: 155: 123: 85: 2455: 1711:

an article, and how an article needs reverted due to vandalism or other issues.

963: 933: 866: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3515:

Would it be acceptable if several sentences were added about the second cover?

2911:

mission, turning people off with over the top threats will do far less for it.

1412:

of the licensing information, no Canadian Forces insignia would be permitted.

901:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

832:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

4024: 4008: 4000: 3973: 3954: 3938: 3879: 3816: 3783: 3765: 3739: 3726: 3712: 3704: 3678: 3637: 3623: 3569: 3555: 3538: 3524: 3510: 3491: 3470: 3442: 3428: 3414: 3398: 3384: 3359: 3339: 3316: 3296: 3263: 3244: 3193: 3178: 3164: 3150: 3136: 3117: 3094: 3055: 3036: 2998: 2975: 2943: 2920: 2899: 2880: 2862: 2828: 2784: 2770: 2748: 2729: 2703: 2677: 2649: 2628: 2598: 2573: 2559: 2537: 2497: 2467: 2448: 2428: 2412: 2360: 2344: 2325: 2309: 2281: 2264:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

2205: 2165: 2150: 2135: 2118: 2097: 2080: 2062: 2036: 2016: 2010: 1992: 1964: 1937: 1903: 1875: 1858: 1831: 1815: 1790: 1750: 1735: 1720: 1705: 1690: 1674: 1653: 1633: 1615: 1588: 1571: 1546: 1519: 1504: 1489: 1467: 1447: 1424: 1257: 1243: 1228: 1214: 1194: 1180: 1165: 1147: 1125: 1110: 1090: 1074: 1049: 1032:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

971: 957: 941: 914: 845: 765: 746: 717: 703: 687: 672: 594: 568: 554: 531: 508: 428: 417: 410: 392: 384: 373: 355: 331: 295: 271: 250: 234: 202: 184: 163: 131: 113: 93: 74: 1624:. These links are forbidden, and need removed. Im sorry if you dont like it. 1357: 1327: 658:

My guess is that the timeline routine is a little picker than it should be.

146:

discussions but this was discussed and it comes down to the basic issues of

1415:

I would like your opinion on the subject. Thank you kindly and good day,

1361: 310: 3912: 1842: 1186: 1157: 925: 2887: 2886:

Knowledge objects to it, as excessive usage of non-free media harms our

2686:

But the pictures do have critical commentary. There is no way they fail

3543: 2815:? Information on reviewing an FA nomination's criteria is available at 2585:

Like I said its not that big of an issue, your article could have been

1336: 1205:

This really annoys me. Please revert your edits made to both articles.

3628:

Whoa, you surely made it look like it then...sorry, forgot to check. -

2664:) and that the files cannot be replaced with text, or something else ( 648:

bar:16 color:Full from:2012 till:end shift:(-84) text:] (2012–present)

119:

The above page is a good place to start, otherwise I can point you to

1314: 870: 790: 483: 479: 154:#14 we only need the primary logo, not logos/artwork for every year. 3350:

if I add the material and you remove it again before 24hrs, right?

2946:

I consider the matter closed but please try to see it from my POV.

678:

Guess thats one more code quirk Ill have to keep an eye out for :/

338:

I have reviewed and cleaned up the linked pages, but Ill point out

487: 475: 3889:

Werieth, I'm a bit confused by your removal of the tri-rail logo

3802:" that can be called directly if you want to collect metadata. -- 3592:). Just thought I'll bring this to your notice. Good day to you, 3389:

PS looking at the history you will actually break 3RR before me.

1601:

What the fuck is your problem? You've now done the same thing to

756:

inclusion requirements. It wasnt removed for lacking a rationale

2391: 2387: 2383: 2027:. Can you provide your sources about archive.is having malware? 1380:

Any other uses of this image, on Knowledge or elsewhere, may be

1306: 305:. Also Almost all the company pages discuss about their awards: 2720:

commentary in the accompanying text." - or some other reason?

1773:

Bing-Bong. This is your Tuesday reminder to finish the job on

1294: 25: 3588:

and the later one. I'm sure you know that's not permissible (

3834: 3677:

or a similar template to notify me of a response. Thanks. —

3231:

Hi Werieth. Could you explain the deletion of the logos on

1360:, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit 3962:

Knowledge:Media_copyright_questions#Please_review.E2.80.A6

822:

d'Arte Moderna]], Rome). He had a studio in the ] on ].ref

311:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Whirlpool_Corporation#Major_brands

3829:

Orphaned non-free image File:Eugene Burdick - The 480.png

3283:

regarding a possible violation of Knowledge's policy on

3019:

has its own article and thus should only be used there.

3890: 3654: 3611: 3585: 2963: 2716: 2269: 2257: 2253: 2238: 1952: 1037: 1025: 1021: 1006: 929: 878: 874: 862: 799: 795: 782: 708:

Not a problem, and I think I fixed the display problem

605: 519: 366: 3866:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

3734:

The microformatting data are included deliberately by

2398:. Not of my doing, but that's the reasoning there. - 1920:, rather than replacing them with the easily findable 630:

bar:16 color:Full from:2012 till:end shift:(-84) text:

615:

bar:16 color:Full from:2012 till:end shift:(-84) text:

577:

removed external link in STEP iso 10303 Knowledge page

302: 301:

Then what is here in this page? Its in same category.

611:

I tracked down that using the ampersand in this line

307:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wipro#Awards_and_recognitions

241:

What do you mean by "the logic of a Knowledge page"?

2753:

Would you object to one or two clips being included

2739:. There are other issues but thats the main points. 1436:

Knowledge:Bots/Requests_for_approval/Archivedotisbot

1434:

Hi, there is an ongoing discussion at the moment at

1201:

Werieth, it turns out what you are saying is wrong.

306: 3964:FLGov doesnt apply. Ill look at the rest in a bit. 873:by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just 818:

Winner at Florentine Exposition of 1861<ref: -->

3281:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring 3346:You do realize that you will be in violation of 3077:states that files should be used minimally, and 886:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 819:''Mary Stuart'' now located at [[Galleria d'Arte 807:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 3917:South Florida Regional Transportation Authority 3774:. That is what I use for date standardization. 1438:. Maybe you are interested to join it. Thanks. 3862:Note that any non-free images not used in any 2799:Hi! Would you care to review or comment/vote ( 3270:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 2186:On a slightly different point when using the 2071:Will you use the edit summary going forward? 8: 3322:I am far from a deletionist, if you look at 1890:For doing what needs to be done, well done! 924:Hi, I just reviewed the changes you made to 1396://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Werieth/201405 437:Disambiguation link notification for May 6 3419:What is that statement supposed to mean? 2160:/ Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review 2130:/ Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review 2092:/ Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review 1873: 1785:/ Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review 1730:/ Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review 1700:/ Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review 1685:/ Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review 1648:/ Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review 1610:/ Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review 1583:/ Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review 1499:/ Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review 1462:/ Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review 1252:/ Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review 3433:What is that triangle supposed to mean? 948:dead, feel free to remove the dead tag. 81:Knowledge:Donating copyrighted materials 3590:Knowledge:Rollback#When to use rollback 3102:what do I need to do to get this added? 2458:, now that I take a second look at it. 2287:File:WestVirginiaPublicBroadcasting.PNG 278:We dont include a list of awards, See 3991:is non-free and isnt in the template. 3799: 3011:Actually the files don't meet policy. 2966:that provided the needed information. 2291:An FUR is listed for each page on the 1797:Is there an automatic webarchive tool? 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3233:Independent lifeboats (British Isles) 2021:archive.org supposedly having malware 860:. I have automatically detected that 780:. I have automatically detected that 7: 3927:. Therefore, it should be free use. 3921:Florida Department of Transportation 3772:User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates 3017:File:Janet Jackson - All For You.ogg 100:advance. I was mostly thinking of a 1299: 794:"s. If you have, don't worry: just 652:as the second one is not an issue. 142:I dont have the link handy for the 3202:possible. 21:23, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 1376:Copyright law of the United States 1343:. It is believed that the use of 1290:Canadian Forces ranks and insignia 1280:Canadian Forces ranks and insignia 24: 3848:File:Eugene Burdick - The 480.png 2396:West Virginia Public Broadcasting 3274: 2216: 1874: 1298: 984: 851: 771: 732: 29: 3254:. Which is why I removed them. 2419:it on every satellite article. 1278:Flag officer Shoulder Boards - 2589:, it went from 335 down to 8. 303:http://en.wikipedia.org/Pureit 1: 3985:File:Santa Clara VTA logo.svg 3902:File:Santa_Clara_VTA_logo.svg 3857:our policy for non-free media 2295:. Why the commenting out? - 416:not something to scoff at. -- 3868:criteria for speedy deletion 3736:Knowledge:WikiProject Albums 1536:British Airways destinations 1055:archive.is in Tintin article 3908:should be removed as well. 1696:attempt to bully your way. 4045: 3227:Independent lifeboat logos 2212:Reference Errors on 14 May 1388:Knowledge:Non-free content 1358:English-language Knowledge 980:Reference Errors on 10 May 903:these opt-out instructions 834:these opt-out instructions 3835: 1918:1889–90 Football Alliance 1880: 1331:by its holder. As well, 793:by modifying 1 "<: --> 121:commons:Commons:Licensing 4025:18:28, 30 May 2014 (UTC) 4001:18:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC) 3974:18:02, 30 May 2014 (UTC) 3955:17:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC) 3880:14:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC) 3817:01:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC) 3784:19:55, 29 May 2014 (UTC) 3766:19:54, 29 May 2014 (UTC) 3727:19:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC) 3705:19:42, 29 May 2014 (UTC) 3638:18:40, 29 May 2014 (UTC) 3624:18:37, 29 May 2014 (UTC) 3570:09:58, 29 May 2014 (UTC) 3556:05:09, 29 May 2014 (UTC) 3539:23:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 3525:23:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 3511:23:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 3492:23:00, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 3471:19:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 3443:18:48, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 3429:14:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 3415:14:44, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 3399:13:48, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 3385:13:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 3360:13:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 3340:02:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 3317:18:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC) 3297:14:01, 27 May 2014 (UTC) 3264:22:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 3245:22:22, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 3194:20:59, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 3179:19:04, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 3165:18:39, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 3151:22:50, 24 May 2014 (UTC) 3137:04:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC) 3118:22:58, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 3095:21:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 3056:19:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 3037:18:15, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 2999:18:08, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 2976:15:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 2944:15:06, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 2921:14:58, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 2900:14:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 2881:14:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 2863:14:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 2829:15:00, 22 May 2014 (UTC) 2785:14:52, 22 May 2014 (UTC) 2771:09:18, 21 May 2014 (UTC) 2759:origins of rock and roll 2749:14:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC) 2730:14:08, 20 May 2014 (UTC) 2712:Origins of rock and roll 2704:17:18, 21 May 2014 (UTC) 2678:17:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC) 2660:), critical commentary ( 2650:16:31, 21 May 2014 (UTC) 2629:08:40, 19 May 2014 (UTC) 2599:18:30, 17 May 2014 (UTC) 2587:Fame in the 20th Century 2574:18:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC) 2560:18:24, 17 May 2014 (UTC) 2538:18:20, 17 May 2014 (UTC) 2498:10:32, 15 May 2014 (UTC) 2468:10:25, 15 May 2014 (UTC) 2449:10:22, 15 May 2014 (UTC) 2429:10:18, 15 May 2014 (UTC) 2413:10:11, 15 May 2014 (UTC) 2361:10:06, 15 May 2014 (UTC) 2345:10:03, 15 May 2014 (UTC) 2326:09:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC) 2310:01:57, 15 May 2014 (UTC) 2282:00:38, 15 May 2014 (UTC) 2270:report it to my operator 2206:21:15, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 2166:08:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 2151:00:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 2136:00:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 2119:00:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 2098:00:31, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 2081:21:41, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 2063:19:50, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 2037:18:00, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 2011:16:33, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 1993:16:26, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 1965:15:51, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 1938:15:27, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 1904:18:24, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 1859:14:06, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 1832:03:56, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 1816:02:35, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 1791:07:57, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 1751:01:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 1736:00:47, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 1721:00:42, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 1706:00:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 1691:00:37, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 1675:00:35, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 1654:00:33, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 1634:00:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 1616:00:30, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 1589:08:14, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1572:00:18, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1547:00:10, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1520:23:22, 10 May 2014 (UTC) 1505:23:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC) 1490:23:07, 10 May 2014 (UTC) 1468:23:04, 10 May 2014 (UTC) 1448:06:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 1425:17:11, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 1285:Good afternoon to you, 1258:21:37, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1244:18:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1229:18:01, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1215:17:59, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1195:17:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1181:16:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1166:15:58, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1148:15:54, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1126:15:11, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1111:13:36, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1091:13:21, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1075:13:05, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1062:The Adventures of Tintin 1050:00:35, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 1038:report it to my operator 972:14:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC) 958:14:01, 10 May 2014 (UTC) 942:13:45, 10 May 2014 (UTC) 474:added links pointing to 309:or their brands/models: 2394:) all redirect back to 1347:images of such symbols 1341:of the Paris Convention 915:23:59, 7 May 2014 (UTC) 879:my operator's talk page 846:15:14, 7 May 2014 (UTC) 800:my operator's talk page 766:16:27, 5 May 2014 (UTC) 747:16:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC) 718:18:00, 7 May 2014 (UTC) 704:17:57, 7 May 2014 (UTC) 688:17:54, 7 May 2014 (UTC) 673:17:53, 7 May 2014 (UTC) 600:FYI re error, now fixed 595:23:46, 6 May 2014 (UTC) 569:19:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC) 555:19:50, 6 May 2014 (UTC) 532:19:45, 6 May 2014 (UTC) 509:08:57, 6 May 2014 (UTC) 429:19:17, 5 May 2014 (UTC) 411:19:13, 5 May 2014 (UTC) 385:19:08, 5 May 2014 (UTC) 356:12:37, 5 May 2014 (UTC) 332:11:10, 5 May 2014 (UTC) 296:10:01, 5 May 2014 (UTC) 272:08:05, 5 May 2014 (UTC) 251:04:10, 5 May 2014 (UTC) 235:04:08, 5 May 2014 (UTC) 203:01:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC) 185:01:15, 2 May 2014 (UTC) 164:22:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 132:00:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC) 114:23:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 94:23:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 75:23:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 3981:File:Caltrain logo.svg 3898:File:Caltrain_logo.svg 3840: 2813:New York Dolls (album) 2227:automatically detected 1779:Batman: Arkham Origins 1430:Archive.is removal bot 1382:copyright infringement 1325:. This symbol may be 995:automatically detected 3983:is PDtext, same with 3925:Government of Florida 3885:Tri-Rail Logo Removal 3845:Thanks for uploading 3838: 3021:File:Janetmtvicon.png 2953:Jericho.Trinity.Omega 2936:Jericho.Trinity.Omega 2913:Jericho.Trinity.Omega 2873:Jericho.Trinity.Omega 2851:Jericho.Trinity.Omega 2795:Soliciting comment... 2635:King Kong vs Godzilla 2243:broken reference name 1620:Ill remind you about 1603:Batman Arkham Origins 623:creates the problem. 461:Whirlpool Corporation 42:of past discussions. 3989:File:Sfmuni logo.png 3906:File:Sfmuni logo.png 3612:I dont have rollback 3027:like I said before. 3013:File:Better Days.ogg 1884:The Cleanup Barnstar 1362:Wikimedia Foundation 869:may have broken the 789:may have broken the 608:broke the timeline. 497:opt-out instructions 443:disambiguation pages 193:and cannot be used. 2982:Critical commentary 1998:after edit conflict 1130:I'll go along with 787:Scipione Vannutelli 469:fix with Dab solver 362:Rogue galaxy images 284:facility technology 3841: 3405:You are correct Δ 3073:'s second clause. 1352:symbol in question 1350:to illustrate the 1098:Tintin (character) 962:strange. thanks! 451:• Join us at the 60:Information page ? 3853:claim of fair use 3813: 2866: 2849:comment added by 2619:comment added by 2519:33rd Alabama Edit 2500: 2451: 2415: 2347: 2312: 2251: 2015:Hm, according to 1999: 1974:talk page stalker 1926:at the very least 1909: 1908: 1405: 1404: 1019: 632:Texas A&M 514:HoET archive urls 456: 322:comment added by 262:comment added by 225:comment added by 102:very general page 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Werieth 4036: 4012: 3942: 3936: 3930: 3843: 3837: 3812: 3809: 3803: 3801: 3797: 3791: 3764: 3747: 3716: 3703: 3686: 3676: 3670: 3666: 3660: 3610: 3370: 3287:. Thank you. 3278: 3277: 3010: 2956: 2865: 2843: 2811:for the article 2809:my FA nomination 2631: 2584: 2549: 2494: 2488: 2484: 2482: 2476: 2445: 2439: 2435: 2409: 2403: 2399: 2341: 2335: 2331: 2306: 2300: 2296: 2245: 2235:Georgina Spelvin 2220: 2219: 2195: 2189: 2108: 2105:Darkwarriorblake 2051: 1997: 1978:Werieth, at the 1977: 1949: 1900: 1878: 1871: 1870: 1867:For your efforts 1664: 1661:Darkwarriorblake 1561: 1555: 1533: 1527: 1479: 1476:Darkwarriorblake 1401: 1397: 1394: 1302: 1301: 1295: 1013: 988: 987: 896: 882: 855: 854: 827: 817: 803: 775: 774: 736: 735: 701: 696: 670: 665: 543: 465:check to confirm 446: 421: 396: 377: 334: 274: 237: 182: 180: 175: 84:wouldn't apply. 33: 32: 26: 4044: 4043: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4035: 4034: 4033: 4010: 3940: 3934: 3928: 3887: 3832: 3831: 3807: 3804: 3795: 3789: 3750: 3741: 3732:Date formatting 3710: 3689: 3680: 3674: 3668: 3664: 3658: 3657:did you remove 3648: 3604: 3582: 3497:It doesnt meet 3479: 3364: 3304: 3275: 3272: 3229: 3004: 2984: 2950: 2844: 2836: 2797: 2714: 2637: 2614: 2611: 2578: 2543: 2521: 2492: 2486: 2480: 2474: 2456:commons:COM:TOO 2443: 2437: 2407: 2401: 2339: 2333: 2304: 2298: 2289: 2217: 2214: 2193: 2187: 2102: 2045: 1971: 1943: 1924:equivalent, or 1914: 1898: 1869: 1799: 1781:. *Bing-Bong*. 1658: 1559: 1553: 1531: 1525: 1473: 1455: 1432: 1399: 1395: 1392: 1283: 1057: 985: 982: 922: 892: 861: 852: 823: 813: 781: 772: 733: 730: 699: 694: 668: 663: 641:I am now using 602: 579: 537: 518:FYI I reverted 516: 453:DPL WikiProject 439: 419: 390: 375: 364: 317: 257: 220: 213: 178: 173: 171: 140: 138:Halloween Havoc 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4042: 4040: 4032: 4031: 4030: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4004: 4003: 3919:, part of the 3886: 3883: 3830: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3651:Please explain 3647: 3646:Confusing edit 3644: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3581: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3541: 3513: 3478: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3387: 3303: 3300: 3271: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3228: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3040: 3039: 2987: 2983: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2903: 2902: 2869: 2835: 2832: 2796: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2713: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2696:Giantdevilfish 2681: 2680: 2642:Giantdevilfish 2636: 2633: 2610: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2520: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2288: 2285: 2266:false positive 2262: 2261: 2213: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2156:others to do. 2085: 2084: 2083: 2066: 2065: 2048:178.149.196.90 2040: 2039: 2029:178.149.196.90 2025:not archive.is 2013: 1995: 1913: 1910: 1907: 1906: 1887: 1886: 1881: 1879: 1868: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1798: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1775:Joker (comics) 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1454: 1451: 1431: 1428: 1417:Ctjj.stevenson 1407: 1403: 1402: 1391: 1366: 1365: 1354: 1345:low-resolution 1303: 1282: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1231: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1056: 1053: 1034:false positive 1030: 1029: 1003:Marvel Studios 981: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 921: 918: 899: 898: 888: 887: 850: 830: 829: 820: 809: 808: 769: 768: 729: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 650: 649: 644: 638:which worked. 636: 635: 634:(2012–present) 621: 620: 619:(2012–present) 601: 598: 578: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 515: 512: 493: 492: 491: 490: 438: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 363: 360: 359: 358: 299: 298: 254: 253: 212: 209: 208: 207: 206: 205: 139: 136: 135: 134: 97: 96: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4041: 4026: 4022: 4018: 4014: 4013: 4006: 4005: 4002: 3998: 3994: 3990: 3986: 3982: 3979: 3978: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3971: 3967: 3963: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3952: 3948: 3944: 3943: 3933: 3926: 3922: 3918: 3914: 3909: 3907: 3903: 3899: 3895: 3891: 3884: 3882: 3881: 3877: 3873: 3870:. Thank you. 3869: 3865: 3860: 3858: 3854: 3850: 3849: 3842: 3828: 3818: 3815: 3811: 3810: 3794: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3781: 3777: 3773: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3762: 3758: 3754: 3749: 3745: 3737: 3733: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3724: 3720: 3714: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3701: 3697: 3693: 3688: 3684: 3673: 3667:? Please use 3663: 3656: 3652: 3645: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3621: 3617: 3613: 3608: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3587: 3579: 3571: 3567: 3563: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3553: 3549: 3545: 3542: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3512: 3508: 3504: 3500: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3489: 3485: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3464: 3460: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3417: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3396: 3392: 3388: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3374: 3368: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3324:my upload log 3321: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3301: 3299: 3298: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3269: 3265: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3226: 3200: 3199:WP:OTHERSTUFF 3197: 3196: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3126: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3103: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3083: 3082: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3008: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2954: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2932: 2929: 2923: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2909: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2867: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2840: 2833: 2831: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2794: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2718: 2711: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2634: 2632: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2608: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2582: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2547: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2526: 2518: 2499: 2495: 2489: 2479: 2478:Non-free logo 2471: 2470: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2452: 2450: 2446: 2440: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2417: 2416: 2414: 2410: 2404: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2349: 2348: 2346: 2342: 2336: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2311: 2307: 2301: 2294: 2286: 2284: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2259: 2255: 2249: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2228: 2224: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2192: 2185: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2106: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2049: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2012: 2008: 2004: 1996: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1981: 1975: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1947: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1911: 1905: 1901: 1895: 1894: 1889: 1888: 1885: 1882: 1877: 1872: 1866: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1839: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1771: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1662: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1604: 1600: 1599: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1558: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1545: 1543: 1542: 1537: 1530: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1477: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1452: 1450: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1440:77.227.74.183 1437: 1429: 1427: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1413: 1409: 1398: 1389: 1385: 1383: 1377: 1373: 1372: 1368:qualifies as 1363: 1359: 1355: 1353: 1349: 1348: 1346: 1342: 1340: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1297: 1296: 1293: 1291: 1286: 1281: 1277: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1232: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1099: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1063: 1054: 1052: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1027: 1023: 1017: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 999: 998: 996: 992: 979: 973: 969: 965: 961: 960: 959: 955: 951: 946: 945: 944: 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 919: 917: 916: 912: 908: 904: 895: 890: 889: 885: 884: 883: 880: 876: 875:edit the page 872: 868: 864: 859: 848: 847: 843: 839: 835: 826: 821: 816: 811: 810: 806: 805: 804: 801: 797: 796:edit the page 792: 788: 784: 779: 767: 763: 759: 755: 751: 750: 749: 748: 744: 740: 739:JavierPHX2013 727: 719: 715: 711: 707: 706: 705: 702: 697: 691: 690: 689: 685: 681: 677: 676: 675: 674: 671: 666: 659: 656: 653: 647: 646: 645: 642: 639: 633: 629: 628: 627: 626:It did have: 624: 618: 617:Texas A&M 614: 613: 612: 609: 607: 606:edit you made 599: 597: 596: 592: 588: 582: 576: 570: 566: 562: 558: 557: 556: 552: 548: 541: 536: 535: 534: 533: 529: 525: 521: 513: 511: 510: 506: 502: 498: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 472: 470: 466: 462: 459: 458: 457: 454: 450: 444: 436: 430: 426: 422: 414: 413: 412: 408: 404: 400: 394: 389: 388: 387: 386: 382: 378: 371: 367: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 340:WP:OTHERSTUFF 337: 336: 335: 333: 329: 325: 321: 313: 312: 308: 304: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 277: 276: 275: 273: 269: 265: 261: 252: 248: 244: 240: 239: 238: 236: 232: 228: 224: 216: 210: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 187: 186: 183: 181: 176: 168: 167: 166: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 137: 133: 129: 125: 122: 118: 117: 116: 115: 111: 107: 103: 95: 91: 87: 82: 79: 78: 77: 76: 72: 68: 59: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4009: 3939: 3915:is owned by 3910: 3888: 3863: 3861: 3846: 3844: 3833: 3806: 3743: 3731: 3682: 3650: 3649: 3630:Ugog Nizdast 3607:Ugog Nizdast 3594:Ugog Nizdast 3583: 3480: 3327: 3305: 3285:edit warring 3273: 3237:Tony Holkham 3230: 3105: 3104:but rather, 3101: 2985: 2964:edit summary 2933: 2927: 2924: 2907: 2904: 2868: 2845:— Preceding 2841: 2837: 2834:WWIII Images 2804: 2800: 2798: 2754: 2715: 2638: 2615:— Preceding 2612: 2609:korinthos fc 2525:33rd Alabama 2522: 2487:Neutralhomer 2438:Neutralhomer 2402:Neutralhomer 2334:Neutralhomer 2299:Neutralhomer 2290: 2274:ReferenceBot 2263: 2258:Ask for help 2226: 2223:ReferenceBot 2215: 1979: 1925: 1915: 1892: 1883: 1847:overreacting 1846: 1837: 1803: 1800: 1602: 1544: 1539: 1456: 1433: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1379: 1371:non-free use 1369: 1367: 1351: 1344: 1338: 1332: 1326: 1319:coat of arms 1287: 1284: 1135: 1131: 1060: 1058: 1042:ReferenceBot 1031: 1026:Ask for help 994: 991:ReferenceBot 983: 923: 900: 893: 849: 831: 824: 814: 770: 731: 660: 657: 654: 651: 643: 640: 637: 625: 622: 610: 603: 583: 581:Hi Werieth, 580: 517: 494: 440: 398: 365: 324:14.141.81.50 318:— Preceding 314: 300: 283: 264:14.141.81.50 258:— Preceding 255: 227:14.141.81.50 221:— Preceding 217: 214: 211:Kent RO page 170: 141: 101: 98: 63: 55: 43: 37: 2621:2.84.34.104 2221:Hello, I'm 1922:archive.org 1541:Jetstreamer 1328:copyrighted 989:Hello, I'm 867:Supercouple 856:Hello, I'm 776:Hello, I'm 695:S Philbrick 664:S Philbrick 587:94.8.83.123 520:this change 215:Hi werieth 36:This is an 3892:. If per 3800:|released= 3793:start date 3662:start date 3463:Nasa-verve 3461:Agreement 3407:Nasa-verve 3367:Nasa-verve 3352:Nasa-verve 3309:Nasa-verve 3289:Nasa-verve 2293:image page 2272:. Thanks, 2268:, you can 2017:Virustotal 1980:very least 1912:archive.is 1893:Ravensfire 1374:under the 1152:Actually, 1040:. Thanks, 1036:, you can 907:BracketBot 905:. Thanks, 858:BracketBot 838:BracketBot 836:. Thanks, 778:BracketBot 499:. Thanks, 152:WP:NFC#UUI 4017:Say Hello 3947:Say Hello 3911:Also, as 3894:WP:NFCC#9 3655:this edit 3586:this edit 3302:practices 3079:WP:NFCC#1 3075:WP:NFCC#3 3071:WP:NFCC#8 2888:m:Mission 2737:WP:NFLIST 2692:WP:NFCC#1 2688:WP:NFCC#8 2666:WP:NFCC#1 2662:WP:NFCC#8 2658:WP:NFCC#3 2581:Ecjmartin 2566:Ecjmartin 2546:Ecjmartin 2530:Ecjmartin 2241:caused a 2239:your edit 2225:. I have 2162:The Joker 2132:The Joker 2094:The Joker 2073:Prhartcom 1985:Prhartcom 1851:Prhartcom 1808:Prhartcom 1787:The Joker 1732:The Joker 1702:The Joker 1687:The Joker 1650:The Joker 1612:The Joker 1585:The Joker 1501:The Joker 1464:The Joker 1337:article 6 1254:The Joker 1236:Prhartcom 1207:Prhartcom 1173:Prhartcom 1154:Prhartcom 1140:Prhartcom 1103:Prhartcom 1067:Prhartcom 1011:URL error 1009:caused a 1007:your edit 993:. I have 920:NY Times? 863:your edit 783:your edit 447:Read the 344:WP:NOTDIR 191:WP:NFLIST 148:WP:NFLIST 106:Boeing720 67:Boeing720 3932:PD-FLGov 3923:and the 3913:Tri-Rail 3864:articles 3740:Justin ( 3679:Justin ( 3580:Rollback 3548:User5482 3517:User5482 3484:User5482 3186:User5482 3157:User5482 3129:User5482 3087:User5482 3048:User5482 3007:User5482 2991:User5482 2859:contribs 2847:unsigned 2763:Ghmyrtle 2722:Ghmyrtle 2617:unsigned 2019:, it is 2003:Struway2 1946:Struway2 1930:Struway2 1843:User:Kww 1393:Fair use 1132:replaced 930:this dif 926:Novartis 728:May 2014 320:unsigned 260:unsigned 223:unsigned 4021:My Work 3993:Werieth 3966:Werieth 3951:My Work 3896:, then 3872:Stefan2 3776:Werieth 3719:Werieth 3653:Why in 3616:Werieth 3562:Werieth 3531:Werieth 3503:Werieth 3499:WP:NFCC 3435:Werieth 3421:Werieth 3391:Werieth 3377:Werieth 3373:WP:NFCC 3332:Werieth 3256:Werieth 3252:WP:NFCC 3171:Werieth 3143:Werieth 3110:Werieth 3029:Werieth 3025:WP:NFCC 2986:Hello, 2968:Werieth 2960:WP:NFCC 2892:Werieth 2817:WP:FACR 2801:support 2777:Werieth 2741:Werieth 2670:Werieth 2591:Werieth 2552:Werieth 2460:Werieth 2421:Werieth 2353:Werieth 2318:Werieth 2233:On the 2198:Keith D 2191:Wayback 2143:Werieth 2111:Werieth 2055:Werieth 1957:Werieth 1953:example 1824:Werieth 1743:Werieth 1713:Werieth 1667:Werieth 1626:Werieth 1564:Werieth 1557:wayback 1512:Werieth 1482:Werieth 1356:on the 1221:Werieth 1136:removed 1118:Werieth 1083:Werieth 1001:On the 950:Werieth 758:Werieth 754:WP:NFCC 710:Werieth 680:Werieth 561:Protonk 547:Werieth 540:Protonk 524:Protonk 501:DPL bot 403:Werieth 348:Werieth 288:Werieth 243:Werieth 195:Werieth 156:Werieth 144:WP:NFCR 124:Werieth 86:Werieth 39:archive 3987:. And 3348:WP:3RR 2805:oppose 2237:page, 1838:Tintin 1804:Tintin 1622:WP:NPA 1315:emblem 1005:page, 964:Jytdog 934:Jytdog 871:syntax 791:syntax 700:(Talk) 669:(Talk) 484:Inglis 480:Estate 370:WP:3RR 280:WP:NOT 4011:Aalox 3941:Aalox 3713:Koavf 3477:Cover 2821:Dan56 2807:) at 1534:, at 1453:Joker 1323:crest 928:, in 825:: --> 488:Roper 476:Amana 393:Masem 179:Spyke 16:< 3997:talk 3970:talk 3960:See 3904:and 3876:talk 3808:Ohc 3780:talk 3770:See 3723:talk 3672:Ping 3634:talk 3620:talk 3598:talk 3566:talk 3552:talk 3544:This 3535:talk 3521:talk 3507:talk 3488:talk 3467:talk 3439:talk 3425:talk 3411:talk 3395:talk 3381:talk 3356:talk 3336:talk 3313:talk 3293:talk 3260:talk 3241:talk 3190:talk 3175:talk 3161:talk 3147:talk 3133:talk 3125:this 3114:talk 3091:talk 3052:talk 3033:talk 2995:talk 2972:talk 2940:talk 2917:talk 2896:talk 2877:talk 2855:talk 2825:talk 2781:talk 2767:talk 2745:talk 2726:talk 2717:This 2700:talk 2674:talk 2646:talk 2625:talk 2595:talk 2570:talk 2556:talk 2534:talk 2493:Talk 2483:. - 2464:talk 2444:Talk 2425:talk 2408:Talk 2392:WSWP 2390:and 2388:WPBY 2384:WNPB 2357:talk 2340:Talk 2322:talk 2305:Talk 2278:talk 2248:help 2202:talk 2147:talk 2115:talk 2077:talk 2059:talk 2033:talk 2007:talk 1989:talk 1961:talk 1934:talk 1899:talk 1855:talk 1828:talk 1812:talk 1777:and 1747:talk 1717:talk 1671:talk 1630:talk 1568:talk 1529:asof 1516:talk 1486:talk 1444:talk 1421:talk 1400:true 1386:See 1311:seal 1307:flag 1240:talk 1225:talk 1211:talk 1191:talk 1177:talk 1162:talk 1144:talk 1122:talk 1107:talk 1087:talk 1071:talk 1046:talk 1016:help 968:talk 954:talk 938:talk 911:talk 842:talk 762:talk 743:talk 714:talk 684:talk 591:talk 565:talk 551:talk 528:talk 505:talk 486:and 420:ASEM 407:talk 376:ASEM 352:talk 328:talk 292:talk 268:talk 247:talk 231:talk 199:talk 160:talk 150:and 128:talk 110:talk 90:talk 71:talk 3859:). 2908:one 2761:? 2668:). 2254:Fix 2252:. ( 2158:DWB 2128:DWB 2090:DWB 1783:DWB 1728:DWB 1698:DWB 1683:DWB 1646:DWB 1608:DWB 1581:DWB 1497:DWB 1460:DWB 1339:ter 1321:or 1250:DWB 1187:Kww 1158:Kww 1022:Fix 1020:. ( 865:to 785:to 604:An 449:FAQ 4023:) 4019:• 3999:) 3972:) 3953:) 3949:• 3937:- 3935:}} 3929:{{ 3900:, 3878:) 3796:}} 3790:{{ 3782:) 3746:vf 3742:ko 3725:) 3685:vf 3681:ko 3675:}} 3669:{{ 3665:}} 3659:{{ 3636:) 3622:) 3614:. 3600:) 3568:) 3554:) 3537:) 3523:) 3509:) 3490:) 3469:) 3441:) 3427:) 3413:) 3397:) 3383:) 3358:) 3338:) 3315:) 3295:) 3262:) 3243:) 3192:) 3177:) 3163:) 3149:) 3135:) 3116:) 3093:) 3054:) 3035:) 2997:) 2974:) 2942:) 2919:) 2898:) 2879:) 2861:) 2857:• 2827:) 2783:) 2769:) 2755:if 2747:) 2728:) 2702:) 2676:) 2648:) 2627:) 2597:) 2572:) 2558:) 2536:) 2496:• 2490:• 2481:}} 2475:{{ 2466:) 2447:• 2441:• 2434:- 2427:) 2411:• 2405:• 2386:, 2359:) 2343:• 2337:• 2324:) 2308:• 2302:• 2280:) 2256:| 2204:) 2194:}} 2188:{{ 2164:? 2149:) 2134:? 2117:) 2096:? 2079:) 2061:) 2035:) 2023:, 2009:) 1991:) 1963:) 1936:) 1902:) 1857:) 1830:) 1814:) 1789:? 1749:) 1734:? 1719:) 1704:? 1689:? 1673:) 1652:? 1632:) 1614:? 1587:? 1570:) 1560:}} 1554:{{ 1532:}} 1526:{{ 1518:) 1503:? 1488:) 1466:? 1446:) 1423:) 1378:. 1317:, 1313:, 1309:, 1256:? 1242:) 1227:) 1213:) 1193:) 1179:) 1164:) 1146:) 1124:) 1109:) 1089:) 1073:) 1048:) 1024:| 970:) 956:) 940:) 913:) 894:]] 844:) 764:) 745:) 716:) 686:) 593:) 567:) 553:) 530:) 507:) 482:, 478:, 471:) 467:| 427:) 409:) 383:) 354:) 346:. 330:) 294:) 270:) 249:) 233:) 201:) 174:TJ 162:) 130:) 112:) 92:) 73:) 4015:( 3995:( 3968:( 3945:( 3874:( 3839:⚠ 3778:( 3763:☯ 3761:M 3759:☺ 3757:C 3755:☮ 3753:T 3751:❤ 3748:) 3744:a 3721:( 3715:: 3711:@ 3702:☯ 3700:M 3698:☺ 3696:C 3694:☮ 3692:T 3690:❤ 3687:) 3683:a 3632:( 3618:( 3609:: 3605:@ 3596:( 3564:( 3550:( 3533:( 3519:( 3505:( 3486:( 3465:( 3437:( 3423:( 3409:( 3393:( 3379:( 3369:: 3365:@ 3354:( 3334:( 3311:( 3291:( 3258:( 3239:( 3188:( 3173:( 3159:( 3145:( 3131:( 3112:( 3089:( 3050:( 3031:( 3009:: 3005:@ 2993:( 2970:( 2955:: 2951:@ 2938:( 2915:( 2894:( 2875:( 2853:( 2823:( 2803:/ 2779:( 2765:( 2743:( 2724:( 2698:( 2672:( 2656:( 2644:( 2623:( 2593:( 2583:: 2579:@ 2568:( 2554:( 2548:: 2544:@ 2532:( 2462:( 2423:( 2355:( 2320:( 2276:( 2260:) 2250:) 2246:( 2200:( 2145:( 2113:( 2107:: 2103:@ 2075:( 2057:( 2050:: 2046:@ 2031:( 2005:( 1987:( 1976:) 1972:( 1959:( 1948:: 1944:@ 1932:( 1896:( 1853:( 1826:( 1810:( 1745:( 1715:( 1669:( 1663:: 1659:@ 1628:( 1566:( 1514:( 1484:( 1478:: 1474:@ 1442:( 1419:( 1390:. 1384:. 1364:, 1238:( 1223:( 1209:( 1189:( 1175:( 1160:( 1142:( 1120:( 1105:( 1085:( 1069:( 1044:( 1028:) 1018:) 1014:( 966:( 952:( 936:( 909:( 881:. 840:( 815:( 802:. 760:( 741:( 712:( 682:( 589:( 563:( 549:( 542:: 538:@ 526:( 503:( 463:( 455:. 425:t 423:( 418:M 405:( 395:: 391:@ 381:t 379:( 374:M 350:( 326:( 290:( 266:( 245:( 229:( 197:( 158:( 126:( 108:( 88:( 69:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index