57:
365:
182:
35:
554:
412:
have been contributing for years. If you want to comment on a DRV discusion, your opinions have to be grounded in a thorough knowledge of policy because your remarks will be analyzed by the other participants. You can't just offer up a random observation or you will be challenged on it and that can get uncomfortable.
415:
You have only been editing here for a few months and you should probably focus on article improvement and tasks like anti-vandalism rather than jumping into advanced administrative work where you could get criticized for offering a casual opinion. You have already been very active on
Knowledge (XXG)
411:
I recommend that you refrain from participating in discussions on this noticeboard until you have a lot more experience on the project. The editors who frequent
Deletion review, assessing decisions made by closers, most of whom are administrators, are some of the most experienced editors here. They
216:
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion
416:
and your work is appreciated, I just wanted to offer you some advice to go slow in areas where your inexperience could be held against you. "Not now" doesn't mean never, it just means you need to work your way up to more demanding areas of the project. That's my advice. Thank you.
464:
and number 3; I haven’t found any improvement to do per se in any articles; but like I said above, you probably won’t be seeing me commenting on any more of those for a long time, because I don’t hardly understand some of those terms used on deletion
303:
I probably should have done a more custom notification on your talk page since it seemed like a simple mistake (although twinkle makes it so easy to not). Definitely thank you for the redirect without the period since it's useful.
468:
Although you will probably be seeing me doing a bunch of anti-vandalism work. You’ll likely be seeing me heavily at SPI because there have been two particular sockmasters that have been causing quite a few problems at
607:
article in case someone wanted to specifically know about the date. Since someone changed the target of the redirect to go to the eclipse article; that purpose has been defeated. My opinion on it: I’ll back either
264:
The issue with this one is the trailing period, which from what I can tell is not a part of the time. I also just tagged as an alternative name and marked as patrolled the redirect you made without the period,
68:
196:, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
379:
573:
330:
This is to all administrators who read the speedy delete notices on the two archives (the “s/1” and “5” entries) and wonder why I’ve blanked and tagged them for speedy deletion.
240:
it is certainly being contested. It is an alternative name. See the article itself. If you’ve tagged it because of ambiguity; why don’t we turn it into a disambiguation page?
121:
341:. The first one was because I had the script wrong. I don’t know why the second (“s/1”) archive was created; but I think it was likely a technical glitch too.
370:
356:
433:
I was just looking around when I saw the deletion reviews and was kinda curious. So no, I probably won’t be commenting on any more of those for a while.
289:
I didn’t know there was a trailing period. In that case please keep the speedy template up. Because it must have been a typo in the creation process.
193:
171:
384:
564:
546:
261:
The CSD templates are supposed to be at the top and disrupt the redirect so the request to delete is visible to people who use the redirect
334:
92:
258:
as trailing period redirects are basically always deleted unless they're actually part of the name, if you still object but first:
487:
Also; for your information: I started editing as an IP editor in
November of 2023; and I registered on May 31 (June 1 UTC)
218:
374:
62:
75:
461:
Number 2, as I stated above; I was curious what deletion review was, so I put my two cents in a couple of them;
129:
213:
189:
175:
542:
43:
is busy and is going to be on
Knowledge (XXG) in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.
603:; I had created the redirect for the sole purpose of redirecting users via the hatnote that I had to the
377:
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
568:
333:
First of all; I have manually moved everything on those archives to the correct archive page, which is
458:) on Commons, so I’ve participated in dozens of deletion discussions over there in the past few weeks;
617:
520:
488:
474:
434:
373:
has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the
342:
290:
241:
154:
140:
515:
vandalizes a page on my watch; they are getting warned; and if it continues, their butt is going to
470:
125:
192:, requesting that it be deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under two or more of the
451:; Part of the reason why I’ve been commenting on those and other deletion related discussions is;
309:
280:
226:
81:
392:
584:
511:
and others telling me it ain’t a good idea; I won’t be at SPI; although you can bet that if
338:
105:
77:
516:
402:
255:
201:
612:
the redirect, since I know that hatnote was probably the only link to that redirect; or
17:
574:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 16 § April 8, 2024 (Monday)
455:
305:
276:
237:
222:
616:
it back to where I had it before (and restoring the hatnote), I’m good either way.
388:
600:
580:
217:
tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
79:
625:
593:
528:
496:
482:
442:
427:
396:
350:
313:
298:
284:
249:
230:
162:
148:
133:
604:
200:
It is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See
454:
Number 1, I’ve been involved in an overhaul of the PD-NWS template (led by @
34:
502:
448:
418:
553:
208:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
371:
Category:Weather events with particularly dangerous situation watches
357:
Category:Weather events with particularly dangerous situation watches
571:. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
473:
the past few years; and they have even fooled me a couple times.
82:
29:
180:
507:
559:
267:
153:
I’ve been suggesting an LTA for more than a month now.
567:
to determine whether its use and function meets the
337:; both pages were created with the wrong names by
254:I'll remove the CSD templates and nominate it at
202:section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion
124:It may indeed be time to open an LTA on them.
8:
51:
219:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
7:
505:; disregard everything I said. Per
335:User talk:Hurricane Clyde/Archive 1
519:, and the sysops can handle them.
25:
552:
363:
55:
33:
577:until a consensus is reached.
359:has been nominated for deletion
626:19:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
594:19:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
529:16:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
497:00:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
483:00:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
443:00:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
428:00:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
397:15:14, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
351:23:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
314:22:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
299:22:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
285:22:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
250:22:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
231:22:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
163:20:32, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
149:18:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
134:17:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
194:criteria for speedy deletion
642:
385:categories for discussion
188:A tag has been placed on
122:Lokicat seems to be back!
104:This page is archived by
565:redirects for discussion
547:Redirects for discussion
408:Hello, Hurricane Clyde,
18:User talk:WestVirginiaWX
190:Tree trimming incident.
176:Tree trimming incident.
560:April 8, 2024 (Monday)
543:April 8, 2024 (Monday)
326:To all who may concern
268:Tree trimming incident
210:contest the nomination
185:
117:Return of a sockmaster
184:
380:the category's entry
569:redirect guidelines
563:has been listed at
186:
387:page. Thank you.
214:visiting the page
114:
113:
109:
47:
46:
16:(Redirected from
633:
623:
592:
562:
556:
526:
510:
494:
480:
440:
426:
367:
366:
348:
296:
270:
247:
183:
160:
146:
103:
83:
59:
58:
52:
37:
30:
21:
641:
640:
636:
635:
634:
632:
631:
630:
620:Hurricane Clyde
618:
578:
558:
550:
523:Hurricane Clyde
521:
506:
491:Hurricane Clyde
489:
477:Hurricane Clyde
475:
437:Hurricane Clyde
435:
417:
406:
368:
364:
361:
345:Hurricane Clyde
343:
328:
293:Hurricane Clyde
291:
266:
244:Hurricane Clyde
242:
181:
179:
172:Speedy deletion
157:Hurricane Clyde
155:
143:Hurricane Clyde
141:
119:
110:
84:
78:
56:
41:Hurricane Clyde
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
639:
637:
629:
628:
587:
549:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
466:
462:
459:
452:
405:
400:
375:categorization
362:
360:
354:
327:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
274:
273:
272:
262:
206:
205:
178:
174:nomination of
169:
168:
167:
166:
165:
126:GeorgeMemulous
118:
115:
112:
111:
102:
101:
98:
97:
96:
95:
87:
86:
85:
80:
76:
74:
73:
60:
49:
45:
44:
38:
27:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
638:
627:
624:
621:
615:
611:
606:
602:
598:
597:
596:
595:
590:
589:
582:
576:
575:
570:
566:
561:
557:The redirect
555:
548:
544:
540:
530:
527:
524:
518:
514:
509:
504:
500:
499:
498:
495:
492:
486:
485:
484:
481:
478:
472:
467:
463:
460:
457:
453:
450:
446:
445:
444:
441:
438:
432:
431:
430:
429:
425:
423:
422:
413:
409:
404:
401:
399:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
381:
376:
372:
358:
355:
353:
352:
349:
346:
340:
336:
331:
325:
315:
311:
307:
302:
301:
300:
297:
294:
288:
287:
286:
282:
278:
275:
269:
263:
260:
259:
257:
253:
252:
251:
248:
245:
239:
235:
234:
233:
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
211:
203:
199:
198:
197:
195:
191:
177:
173:
170:
164:
161:
158:
152:
151:
150:
147:
144:
138:
137:
136:
135:
131:
127:
123:
116:
107:
100:
99:
94:
91:
90:
89:
88:
71:
70:
65:
64:
54:
53:
50:
42:
39:
36:
32:
31:
28:
19:
619:
613:
609:
585:
572:
551:
545:" listed at
522:
512:
490:
476:
436:
420:
419:
414:
410:
407:
378:
369:
344:
332:
329:
292:
243:
209:
207:
187:
156:
142:
120:
67:
61:
48:
40:
26:
614:retargeting
471:WP: WEATHER
339:ClueBot III
106:ClueBot III
605:April 2024
456:Rlandmann
139:Open one
610:deleting
306:Skynxnex
277:Skynxnex
238:Skynxnex
223:Skynxnex
63:Archives
465:review.
389:Bearcat
383:on the
601:Ahecht
581:Ahecht
513:anyone
403:WP:DRV
256:WP:RFD
508:Bbb23
69:Index
588:PAGE
586:TALK
393:talk
310:talk
281:talk
227:talk
130:talk
517:AIV
503:Liz
449:Liz
221:.
212:by
622:🌀
579:--
525:🌀
493:🌀
479:🌀
439:🌀
424:iz
395:)
347:🌀
312:)
295:🌀
283:)
246:🌀
229:)
204:.)
159:🌀
145:🌀
132:)
72:)
599:@
591:)
583:(
541:"
501:@
447:@
421:L
391:(
308:(
279:(
271:.
236:@
225:(
128:(
108:.
93:1
66:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
