User talk:Wikiwayman

534: 448: 365: 269: 169: 87: 31: 1198: 837:(books only) for "Landed Gentry Blythswood" took me to Burke's "A Genealogical and Heraldic History of the Landed Gentry of Great Britain (etc), Volume 1" (1871) which confirms James as the eldest brother's name, succeeding to the old feudal title of Blysthwood on the death of his father's cousin (also James). So, in my opinion, the parliamentary source is likely to be the erroneous one. 965: 1036:

I'm not sure about the date (1562/67?) as I cannot read the text; but the seal does appear to be that of the earls of Lennox from 1495 (Scottish Armorial seals, p334). If the date is correct, it certainly throws up the conundrum of Andrew CoD once again - his existence is no longer in doubt, just his

832:

The first Colin was Laird of Mains and died in 1801, marked in the WP article as 15th. His brother Robert assumes the title on his death and has issue, firstly John who dies in 1803 (a year before his father but is still marked as Laird?) and secondly to the second Colin, who dies in 1820. The second

788:

Update on the gravestones - look like there's a pair from 1783 (or possibly 1785), one of which has an additional burial from 1811 added to it. All very indistinct, definitely "Douglas of" but I can't confirm anything else. It's quite possible that the Lairds (as heritors) would have been buried in

836:

Henrietta Dunlop was the sister-in-law of the first Colin, marrying his eldest brother. However, this is where the sources differ, because this source indicates that the oldest brother's name was not Andrew, but James. James is marked in the Mains article as 14th Laird. A special search on Google

1017:

Curiously there is a document listing Andrew CoD as a baillie of the earl of Lennox in 1567 on ebay this week , listed as "Superb 1562 HAND WRITTEN Vellum MANUSCRIPT With Original WAX SEAL", which shows he was still alive in 1567. The other baillies of Lennox in 1567 were Alexander Campbell of

878:

I notice a recent revision and find that there is no discussion on the Douglas of Mains page. From your recollection, was there any? I find on other talk pages that revisions to the headers have resulted in deletion of discussion, which is concerning, do am wondering about this page.

812:) states he was 2nd s. of Col. Andrew Campbell of Blythswood (formerly Douglas of Mains) by Henrietta, da. of James Dunlop of Glasgow. historyofparliamentonline also staes he was unmarried, yet we know he had a family, so i am not sure how accurate it is. Do you? 766:

Thanks - I still have some working material that didn't go into the article that you may find useful. I also found (yesterday, while looking for traces of Archibald Campbell Douglas) what looks like it could be the grave marker of a Laird in

1112:. I work for his company Sensory Cloud, which is developing a Covid hygiene prophylactic using aerosolized calcium fortified saline. Talk:David Edwards (engineer)#Request Edit Nov 5 2020 Thanks for your consideration. 771:

churchyard. It was difficult to read and quite eroded, but if I can determine a year of death, that would be great. When I get it all together, I'll try to forward this stuff on to you at your Douglas archive site.

721:

I think the DYK is good to go, and marked it as such. The other day I left you a little note on my talkpage, and wondered if you knew more about the heraldry used within the family. Is there a Stewart connection?--

1243: 1227:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 978: 399: 938: 211: 926: 1212: 1073:

Alexander Campbell of Ardoch turns up again at the same period (1499), this time accused of rustling oxen with the first Laird's father (Cunningham of Polmaise), recorded in the

307: 1105: 829:

There are three Colins in the family tree at that time, according to "A Short History of Mains" which I happen to have left in my briefcase and can refer to right now.

572: 840:

This family's history is quite a nightmare to follow due to the changing titles and associated surnames. It wouldn't surprise me if they used to confuse themselves!

595:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

482: 54:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 805: 625: 1123:

I see you are a member of the WIkiProject Chemical and Bio Engineering. I’ve made a number of proposals that I think improve the article about

659: 710: 1266: 1131:. I can’t implement these myself since I have a conflict of interest. Would you mind looking at these proposals and providing feedback? 1077:. Google seems otherwise pretty scant on these chaps, so I'd tend towards an early 16th century date for the manuscript (first decade). 582: 592: 679:! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the 809: 635:

and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

1262: 754: 110:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 1175:

You are very welcome! I've some experience in managing a range of personalities in real life, so I guess that's been useful!

894:

I have this page on my watchlist and nothing seems to have flagged up recently. What kind of revision do you think happened?

726: 501: