1056:, where a hired repossessor towed away a car even after the registered owner locked herself in it, the court decided that this was an unlawful breach of the peace and declared the repossession invalid. The debtor was also awarded $ 1,200,000 in damages from the bank. However, notably, a breach of the peace will invariably constitute a criminal misdemeanor. Criminal law imparts separate and distinct liability upon each actor considered a person under the law, and therefore a corporation and the corporation's employee may both be charged with having committed exactly the same crime, in addition to any civil liability for which the law imposes.
978:(sometimes referred to as 'scope and course of employment'). To determine whether the employer is liable, the difference between an independent contractor and an employee is to be drawn. In order to be vicariously liable, there must be a requisite relationship between the defendant and the tortfeasor, which could be examined by three tests: Control test, Organisation test, and Sufficient relationship test. An employer may be held liable under principles of vicarious liability if an employee does an authorized act in an unauthorized way.
43:
872:
1163:
employer can attempt to avoid liability by claiming the employee's conduct was outside of the scope of the employee's authority, but the employer generally cannot sue the employee to recover indemnification for the employee's torts. For an example of a court confirming an employer's right to sue an employee for indemnification, see the case of
1162:
The question of indemnification arises when either solely the employee or solely the employer is sued. If only the employee is sued, then that employee may seek indemnification from the employer if the conduct was within the course and scope of their employment. If only the employer is sued, then the
1027:
the driver is using the car primarily for the purpose of performing a task for the owner. Courts have been reluctant to extend this liability to the owners of other kinds of chattel. For example, the owner of a plane will not be vicariously liable for the actions of a pilot to whom he or she has lent
952:
because, unlike contributory infringement, knowledge is not an element of vicarious liability. The law has developed the view that some relationships by their nature require the person who engages others to accept responsibility for the wrongdoing of those others. The most important such relationship
1126:
So if a director or officer is expressly authorised to make representations of a particular class on behalf of the company, and fraudulently makes a representation of that class to a third party causing loss, the company will be liable even though the particular representation was an improper way of
1006:
In
Australia, the 'sufficient relationship' test, entailing the balancing of several factors such as skill levels required in the job, pay schemes, and degree of control granted to the worker, has been the favoured approach. For an act to be considered within the course of employment, it must either
1136:
2 QB 711, a company secretary fraudulently hired cars for his own use without the knowledge of the managing director. A company secretary routinely enters into contracts in the company's name and has administrative responsibilities that would give apparent authority to hire cars. Hence, the company
1043:
for non-payment, the lienholder has a non-delegable duty not to cause a breach of the peace in performing the repossession, or it will be liable for damages even if the repossession is performed by an agent. This requirement means that whether a repossession is performed by the lienholder or by an
1145:
A common misconception involves the liability of the employee for tortious acts committed within the scope and authority of their employment. Although the employer is liable under respondeat superior for the employee's conduct, the employee, too, remains jointly liable for the harm caused. As the
1154:
An agent is subject to liability to a third party harmed by the agent's tortious conduct. Unless an applicable statute provides otherwise, an actor remains subject to liability although the actor acts as an agent or an employee, with actual or apparent authority, or within the scope of
1010:
Courts sometimes distinguish between an employee's "detour" vs. "a frolic of their own". For instance, an employer will be held liable if it is shown that the employee had gone on a mere detour in carrying out their duties, such as stopping to buy a beverage or use an
1122:
1 AC 717), their acts and omissions and their knowledge could be attributed to the company, and this could give rise to liability as joint tortfeasors where the directors have assumed responsibility on their own behalf and not just on behalf of the company.
1106:
2 AC 500, two employees of the company, acting within the scope of their authority but unknown to the directors, used company funds to acquire some shares. The question was whether the company knew, or ought to have known, that it had acquired those shares.
940:, the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability or duty to control" the activities of a violator. It can be distinguished from
1127:
doing what he was authorised to do. The extent of authority is a question of fact and is significantly more than the fact of an employment which gave the employee the opportunity to carry out the fraud.
1047:
This requirement not to breach the peace is held upon the lienholder even if the breach is caused by, say, the debtor's objecting to the repossession or resisting the repossession. In the court case of
1181:, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that in cases of abuse scandals involving Catholic priests, liability derives from the power and authority over parishioners that the Church gave to its clergymen.
1095:
can only act through its employees and agents so it is necessary to decide in which circumstances the law of agency or vicarious liability will apply to hold the corporation liable in tort for the
1015:
while running a work-related errand, whereas an employee acting in their own right rather than on the employer's business is undertaking a "frolic" and will not subject the employer to liability.
1132:
1102:
If liability for the particular tort requires a state of mind, then to be liable, the director or senior officer must have that state of mind and it must be attributed to the company. In
1075:
When a child causes an injury, parents may be held liable for their own negligent acts, such as failure to properly supervise a child, or failure to keep a dangerous instrument such as a
1023:
The owner of an automobile can be held vicariously liable for negligence committed by a person to whom the car has been lent, as if the owner was a principal and the driver their agent,
1079:
outside the reach of their children. Many states have also passed laws that impose some liability on parents for the intentional wrongful acts committed by their minor children.
1072:
generally follows the common law principle that a parent is not civilly liable for injuries resulting from a child's negligence merely because of the parent-child relationship.
1028:
it to perform the owner's purpose. In the United States, vicarious liability for automobiles has since been abolished with respect to car leasing and rental in all 50 states.
995:(one who acts through another acts in one's own interests). That is a parallel concept to vicarious liability and strict liability, in which one person is held liable in
53:
1165:
155:
1607:
Meah, Nafees; Petchey, Philip (January 2005). "Liability of
Churches and Religious Organizations for Sexual Abuse of Children by Ministers of Religion".
295:
1698:
1147:
230:
1205:
1069:
902:
1294:
1007:
be authorized or be so connected with an authorized act that it can be considered a mode, though an improper mode, of performing it.
87:
1471:
1708:
1672:
1552:
991:
621:
31:
1295:"The Boundaries of Vicarious Liability: An Economic Analysis of the Scope of Employment Rule and Related Legal Doctrines"
1114:
held that it did. Whether by virtue of their actual or ostensible authority as agents acting within their authority (see
1279:
411:
1332:
627:
69:
401:
1703:
1655:
716:
565:
1553:"Negligent hiring and the information age: How state legislatures can save employers from inevitable liability"
1365:
1012:
749:
733:
300:
260:
65:
30:
This article is about vicarious liability in private litigation. For vicarious liability in criminal law, see
1397:
1369:
614:
439:
406:
1420:
1200:
941:
895:
810:
632:
543:
386:
331:
235:
130:
1044:
agent, the repossessor must not cause a breach of the peace or the lienholder will be held responsible.
770:
744:
663:
553:
548:
510:
305:
265:
252:
1220:
Banerjee, Angshuman. Vicarious
Liability. Ethics and Social Responsibility. Germany, GRIN Verlag, 2016.
1217:
Gray, Anthony. Vicarious
Liability: Critique and Reform. United Kingdom, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018.
949:
242:
182:
1582:
1442:
1238:
970:
936:
923:
607:
560:
497:
320:
121:
1624:
1314:
1273:
850:
737:
668:
637:
528:
492:
468:
424:
207:
149:
1190:
888:
795:
790:
780:
775:
591:
570:
434:
380:
367:
315:
275:
1649:
1616:
1306:
1040:
919:
785:
658:
586:
538:
487:
420:
362:
270:
247:
189:
177:
1385:
1361:
1195:
462:
391:
374:
1389:
1178:
1053:
840:
596:
478:
396:
198:
144:
139:
1527:
1692:
1628:
1356:
1111:
1065:
805:
680:
1239:"Religious Tech. Center v. Netcom On-Line Comm., 907 F. Supp. 1361 (N.D. Cal 1995)"
1036:
996:
931:
858:
845:
835:
800:
754:
340:
1501:
17:
1092:
1088:
871:
711:
444:
310:
225:
1620:
1133:
Panorama
Developments (Guildford) Limited v Fidelis Furnishing Fabrics Limited
1032:
986:
975:
974:
doctrine, for negligent acts or omissions by their employees in the course of
965:
927:
876:
820:
723:
675:
345:
286:
212:
104:
854:
961:
830:
690:
453:
350:
172:
1645:
1318:
1076:
685:
653:
533:
355:
1421:"Federal Law Puts Brakes on Vicarious Liability for Auto Rental Firms"
1118:
AC 716) or as employees acting in the course of their employment (see
1104:
Meridian Global Funds
Management Asia Limited v. Securities Commission
982:
728:
695:
1677:
1310:
1096:
505:
1333:"Vicarious Liability, Report No. 56 | Office of Justice Programs"
1000:
945:
519:
112:
1031:
One example is in the case of a bank, finance company or other
944:, another form of secondary liability, which is rooted in the
36:
1254:
citing 3 Nimmer on
Copyrihgt § 12.04(A)(1), at 12-70 (1995)
27:
Extended liability to parties that had to control violators
1502:"Parental Liability for Damages Caused by Their Children"
953:
for practical purposes is that of employer and employee.
61:
1583:"Lister v. the Romford Ice and Cold Storage Co. Ltd"
1443:"MBank El Paso, NA v. Sanchez, 836 SW 2d 151 (1992)"
1409:
Hilton v. Thomas Burton (Rhodes) Ltd. 1 W.L.R. 705.
1676:
1391:
1140:
1508:. Connecticut General Assembly. 4 February 2011
1268:. Dublin 12: Gill & Macmillan. p. 506.
1152:
1472:"Parental Libality for the Torts of Children"
1159:Every American state follows this same rule.
896:
50:The examples and perspective in this article
8:
1658:Company Law Review: Attribution of Liability
1166:Lister v Romford Ice and Cold Storage Co Ltd
1141:Employees' continued liability and indemnity
156:Intentional infliction of emotional distress
1648:, 'Basis of Vicarious Liability' (1916) 26
1423:. Wells Media Group, Inc. Insurance Journal
989:principle represented in the Latin phrase,
903:
889:
296:Negligent infliction of emotional distress
99:
88:Learn how and when to remove this message
1465:
1463:
1230:
1148:Restatement of the Law of Agency, Third
818:
762:
703:
645:
578:
518:
477:
452:
419:
330:
285:
197:
164:
129:
111:
1271:
1003:for the acts or omissions of another.
1099:of its directors or senior officers.
7:
1656:Department of Trade & Industry.
1206:Vicarious liability in English law
25:
1673:Bramwell, George William Wilshere
1532:LII / Legal Information Institute
1083:Liability of corporations in tort
1419:Abrams, Jim (19 December 2005).
992:qui facit per alium facit per se
870:
41:
1293:Sykes, Alan O. (January 1988).
1120:Armagas Limited v Mundogas S.A.
622:Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
1699:Legal doctrines and principles
1506:Office of Legislative Research
1116:Lloyd v Grace, Smith & Co.
32:Vicarious liability (criminal)
1:
1557:William & Mary Law Review
732:(term used for torts in some
1173:Ecclesiastical corporations
628:Joint and several liability
64:, discuss the issue on the
1725:
1621:10.1350/clwr.34.1.39.60192
1039:of an automobile from the
402:Comparative responsibility
29:
1146:American Law Institute's
717:Non-economic damages caps
1470:Freer, Alice B. (1964).
1278:: CS1 maint: location (
1050:MBank El Paso v. Sanchez
1018:
1013:automated teller machine
956:
750:Private attorney general
704:Other topics in tort law
332:Principles of negligence
261:Alienation of affections
1709:United States labor law
1609:Common Law World Review
1070:parental responsibility
615:Volenti non fit injuria
440:Ultrahazardous activity
407:Contributory negligence
1551:Peebles, K.A. (2011).
1382:Deatons Pty Ltd v Flew
1201:Peculiar risk doctrine
1157:
981:Employers may also be
942:contributory liability
926:that arises under the
633:Market share liability
566:Shopkeeper's privilege
544:Statute of limitations
387:Restitutio ad integrum
236:Intrusion on seclusion
131:Trespass to the person
1684:. London: P. S. King.
1528:"Vicarious Liability"
1386:[1949] HCA 60
1362:[2001] HCA 44
1177:In the 2003 decision
1019:Principals' liability
745:Conflict of tort laws
511:Tortious interference
266:Criminal conversation
253:Malicious prosecution
1679:Employers' liability
1476:Kentucky Law Journal
1264:Quill, Eoin (2014).
957:Employers' liability
950:enterprise liability
243:Breach of confidence
70:create a new article
62:improve this article
52:may not represent a
971:respondeat superior
937:respondeat superior
924:secondary liability
916:Vicarious liability
738:mixed legal systems
608:Respondeat superior
602:Vicarious liability
561:Defence of property
498:Insurance bad faith
412:Attractive nuisance
231:Invasion of privacy
1299:Harvard Law Review
1068:, the question of
1060:Parental liability
968:liable, under the
638:Transferred intent
529:Assumption of risk
493:Restraint of trade
469:Rylands v Fletcher
301:Employment-related
150:False imprisonment
18:Vicariously liable
1191:Attribution (law)
913:
912:
786:England and Wales
741:
592:Last clear chance
587:Intentional torts
571:Neutral reportage
554:Defense of others
502:
435:Product liability
381:Res ipsa loquitur
368:Reasonable person
276:Breach of promise
125:
98:
97:
90:
72:, as appropriate.
16:(Redirected from
1716:
1704:Public liability
1685:
1683:
1650:Yale Law Journal
1633:
1632:
1604:
1598:
1597:
1595:
1593:
1587:Internet Archive
1579:
1573:
1572:
1570:
1568:
1548:
1542:
1541:
1539:
1538:
1524:
1518:
1517:
1515:
1513:
1498:
1492:
1491:
1489:
1487:
1467:
1458:
1457:
1455:
1453:
1439:
1433:
1432:
1430:
1428:
1416:
1410:
1407:
1401:
1393:
1379:
1373:
1353:
1347:
1346:
1344:
1343:
1329:
1323:
1322:
1290:
1284:
1283:
1277:
1269:
1266:Torts in Ireland
1261:
1255:
1253:
1251:
1249:
1235:
1041:registered owner
918:is a form of a
905:
898:
891:
875:
874:
731:
500:
363:Standard of care
248:Abuse of process
158:
119:
100:
93:
86:
82:
79:
73:
45:
44:
37:
21:
1724:
1723:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1689:
1688:
1671:
1668:
1642:
1637:
1636:
1606:
1605:
1601:
1591:
1589:
1581:
1580:
1576:
1566:
1564:
1550:
1549:
1545:
1536:
1534:
1526:
1525:
1521:
1511:
1509:
1500:
1499:
1495:
1485:
1483:
1469:
1468:
1461:
1451:
1449:
1441:
1440:
1436:
1426:
1424:
1418:
1417:
1413:
1408:
1404:
1380:
1376:
1354:
1350:
1341:
1339:
1331:
1330:
1326:
1311:10.2307/1341141
1292:
1291:
1287:
1270:
1263:
1262:
1258:
1247:
1245:
1237:
1236:
1232:
1227:
1214:
1212:Further reading
1196:Superior orders
1187:
1175:
1150:§ 7.01 states,
1143:
1085:
1062:
1021:
959:
909:
869:
763:By jurisdiction
463:Public nuisance
392:Rescue doctrine
375:Proximate cause
287:Negligent torts
199:Dignitary torts
154:
94:
83:
77:
74:
59:
46:
42:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1722:
1720:
1712:
1711:
1706:
1701:
1691:
1690:
1687:
1686:
1667:
1666:External links
1664:
1663:
1662:
1653:
1641:
1638:
1635:
1634:
1599:
1574:
1543:
1519:
1493:
1459:
1447:Google Scholar
1434:
1411:
1402:
1374:
1348:
1324:
1305:(3): 563–609.
1285:
1256:
1243:Google Scholar
1229:
1228:
1226:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1218:
1213:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1193:
1186:
1183:
1179:Doe v. Bennett
1174:
1171:
1142:
1139:
1084:
1081:
1061:
1058:
1054:836 S.W.2d 151
1020:
1017:
958:
955:
911:
910:
908:
907:
900:
893:
885:
882:
881:
880:
879:
877:Law portal
864:
863:
862:
861:
848:
843:
838:
833:
825:
824:
816:
815:
814:
813:
808:
803:
798:
793:
791:European Union
788:
783:
778:
773:
765:
764:
760:
759:
758:
757:
752:
747:
742:
726:
721:
720:
719:
706:
705:
701:
700:
699:
698:
693:
688:
683:
678:
673:
672:
671:
666:
661:
648:
647:
643:
642:
641:
640:
635:
630:
625:
618:
611:
604:
599:
597:Eggshell skull
594:
589:
581:
580:
576:
575:
574:
573:
568:
563:
558:
557:
556:
546:
541:
536:
531:
523:
522:
516:
515:
514:
513:
508:
503:
501:(American law)
495:
490:
482:
481:
479:Economic torts
475:
474:
473:
472:
465:
457:
456:
450:
449:
448:
447:
442:
437:
429:
428:
417:
416:
415:
414:
409:
404:
399:
397:Duty to rescue
394:
389:
384:
377:
372:
371:
370:
360:
359:
358:
353:
348:
335:
334:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
318:
308:
303:
298:
290:
289:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
273:
268:
263:
255:
250:
245:
240:
239:
238:
228:
223:
222:
221:
218:
210:
202:
201:
195:
194:
193:
192:
187:
186:
185:
180:
167:
166:
165:Property torts
162:
161:
160:
159:
152:
147:
142:
134:
133:
127:
126:
116:
115:
109:
108:
96:
95:
56:of the subject
54:worldwide view
49:
47:
40:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1721:
1710:
1707:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1697:
1696:
1694:
1682:
1680:
1674:
1670:
1669:
1665:
1660:
1659:
1654:
1651:
1647:
1644:
1643:
1639:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1603:
1600:
1588:
1584:
1578:
1575:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1547:
1544:
1533:
1529:
1523:
1520:
1507:
1503:
1497:
1494:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1466:
1464:
1460:
1448:
1444:
1438:
1435:
1422:
1415:
1412:
1406:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1387:
1383:
1378:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1364:, (2001) 207
1363:
1359:
1358:
1357:Hollis v Vabu
1352:
1349:
1338:
1334:
1328:
1325:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1289:
1286:
1281:
1275:
1267:
1260:
1257:
1244:
1240:
1234:
1231:
1224:
1219:
1216:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1204:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1189:
1188:
1184:
1182:
1180:
1172:
1170:
1169:
1167:
1160:
1156:
1151:
1149:
1138:
1135:
1134:
1128:
1124:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1112:Privy Council
1108:
1105:
1100:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1082:
1080:
1078:
1073:
1071:
1067:
1066:United States
1059:
1057:
1055:
1051:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1035:performing a
1034:
1029:
1026:
1016:
1014:
1008:
1004:
1002:
998:
994:
993:
988:
984:
979:
977:
973:
972:
967:
963:
954:
951:
947:
943:
939:
938:
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
906:
901:
899:
894:
892:
887:
886:
884:
883:
878:
873:
868:
867:
866:
865:
860:
856:
852:
849:
847:
844:
842:
839:
837:
834:
832:
829:
828:
827:
826:
822:
817:
812:
811:United States
809:
807:
804:
802:
799:
797:
794:
792:
789:
787:
784:
782:
779:
777:
774:
772:
769:
768:
767:
766:
761:
756:
753:
751:
748:
746:
743:
739:
735:
730:
727:
725:
722:
718:
715:
714:
713:
710:
709:
708:
707:
702:
697:
694:
692:
689:
687:
684:
682:
679:
677:
674:
670:
667:
665:
662:
660:
657:
656:
655:
652:
651:
650:
649:
644:
639:
636:
634:
631:
629:
626:
624:
623:
619:
617:
616:
612:
610:
609:
605:
603:
600:
598:
595:
593:
590:
588:
585:
584:
583:
582:
577:
572:
569:
567:
564:
562:
559:
555:
552:
551:
550:
547:
545:
542:
540:
537:
535:
532:
530:
527:
526:
525:
524:
521:
517:
512:
509:
507:
504:
499:
496:
494:
491:
489:
486:
485:
484:
483:
480:
476:
471:
470:
466:
464:
461:
460:
459:
458:
455:
451:
446:
443:
441:
438:
436:
433:
432:
431:
430:
426:
422:
418:
413:
410:
408:
405:
403:
400:
398:
395:
393:
390:
388:
385:
383:
382:
378:
376:
373:
369:
366:
365:
364:
361:
357:
354:
352:
349:
347:
344:
343:
342:
339:
338:
337:
336:
333:
329:
322:
319:
317:
314:
313:
312:
309:
307:
304:
302:
299:
297:
294:
293:
292:
291:
288:
284:
277:
274:
272:
269:
267:
264:
262:
259:
258:
257:Sexual torts
256:
254:
251:
249:
246:
244:
241:
237:
234:
233:
232:
229:
227:
224:
219:
216:
215:
214:
211:
209:
208:Appropriation
206:
205:
204:
203:
200:
196:
191:
188:
184:
181:
179:
176:
175:
174:
171:
170:
169:
168:
163:
157:
153:
151:
148:
146:
143:
141:
138:
137:
136:
135:
132:
128:
123:
118:
117:
114:
110:
106:
102:
101:
92:
89:
81:
78:December 2016
71:
67:
63:
57:
55:
48:
39:
38:
33:
19:
1678:
1657:
1615:(1): 39–61.
1612:
1608:
1602:
1590:. Retrieved
1586:
1577:
1565:. Retrieved
1560:
1556:
1546:
1535:. Retrieved
1531:
1522:
1510:. Retrieved
1505:
1496:
1484:. Retrieved
1479:
1475:
1450:. Retrieved
1446:
1437:
1425:. Retrieved
1414:
1405:
1400:(Australia).
1381:
1377:
1372:(Australia).
1355:
1351:
1340:. Retrieved
1336:
1327:
1302:
1298:
1288:
1265:
1259:
1246:. Retrieved
1242:
1233:
1176:
1164:
1161:
1158:
1153:
1144:
1137:was liable.
1131:
1129:
1125:
1119:
1115:
1109:
1103:
1101:
1086:
1074:
1063:
1049:
1046:
1037:repossession
1030:
1024:
1022:
1009:
1005:
997:criminal law
990:
980:
969:
960:
935:
930:doctrine of
915:
914:
836:Criminal law
755:Class action
620:
613:
606:
601:
549:Self-defense
467:
445:Deep pockets
379:
341:Duty of care
103:Part of the
84:
75:
51:
1592:6 September
1567:6 September
1512:6 September
1486:6 September
1452:6 September
1427:6 September
1337:www.ojp.gov
1248:6 September
1155:employment.
1093:corporation
1089:English law
966:vicariously
712:Tort reform
346:Trespassers
311:Malpractice
306:Entrustment
226:False light
1693:Categories
1640:References
1537:2021-08-30
1398:High Court
1390:(1949) 79
1370:High Court
1342:2021-08-30
1033:lienholder
987:common law
985:under the
976:employment
948:theory of
928:common law
821:common law
724:Quasi-tort
676:Injunction
669:Incidental
488:Conspiracy
213:Defamation
190:Conversion
105:common law
1629:144364324
1274:cite book
962:Employers
831:Contracts
771:Australia
579:Liability
539:Necessity
427:liability
351:Licensees
271:Seduction
66:talk page
1675:(1880).
1185:See also
846:Property
841:Evidence
691:Replevin
659:Punitive
646:Remedies
520:Defences
454:Nuisance
425:absolute
356:Invitees
183:chattels
173:Trespass
113:Tort law
60:You may
1646:H Laski
1319:1341141
1077:handgun
1064:In the
859:estates
686:Detinue
681:Tracing
664:Special
654:Damages
534:Consent
321:medical
217:Slander
145:Battery
140:Assault
122:Outline
1681:
1627:
1563:: 1397
1317:
1097:frauds
983:liable
932:agency
920:strict
857:, and
855:trusts
819:Other
806:Taiwan
776:Canada
729:Delict
696:Trover
421:Strict
107:series
1661:(PDF)
1625:S2CID
1482:: 254
1384:
1360:
1315:JSTOR
1225:Notes
851:Wills
823:areas
801:Japan
796:India
781:China
734:civil
506:Fraud
316:legal
220:Libel
68:, or
1594:2017
1569:2017
1514:2017
1488:2017
1454:2017
1429:2017
1368:21,
1280:link
1250:2017
1110:The
1091:, a
1001:tort
964:are
946:tort
736:and
423:and
178:land
1652:105
1617:doi
1394:370
1392:CLR
1366:CLR
1307:doi
1303:101
1130:In
1087:In
999:or
1695::
1623:.
1613:34
1611:.
1585:.
1561:53
1559:.
1555:.
1530:.
1504:.
1480:53
1478:.
1474:.
1462:^
1445:.
1396:,
1388:,
1335:.
1313:.
1301:.
1297:.
1276:}}
1272:{{
1241:.
1052:,
1025:if
934:,
922:,
853:,
1631:.
1619::
1596:.
1571:.
1540:.
1516:.
1490:.
1456:.
1431:.
1345:.
1321:.
1309::
1282:)
1252:.
1168:.
904:e
897:t
890:v
740:)
124:)
120:(
91:)
85:(
80:)
76:(
58:.
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.