Knowledge (XXG)

Whitmore v. Arkansas

Source ๐Ÿ“

34: 322:
granted a stay of Simmons' execution while they considered Franz's petition. The Arkansas courts ultimately rejected Franz's petition due to the fact that Franz had not established that he had previously met Simmons, let alone had a close relationship to him. Franz also claimed standing as an aggrieved taxpayer and a concerned citizen. Both of those claims were also rejected.
382:
greatest extent possible that no person is wrongfully executed. A person is just as wrongfully executed when he is innocent of the crime or was improperly convicted as when he was erroneously sentenced to death. States therefore must provide review of both the convictions and sentences in death cases."
321:
Prior to Whitmore seeking appeal of Simmons' sentence, Louis J. Franz filed an appeal for Simmons as his next friend. Franz was a Catholic priest who ministered to prisoners in Arkansas and was also a member of Arkansas Churches for Life, an anti-death penalty organization. The Arkansas Supreme Court
360:
Lastly, Whitmore was ineligible to file suit as next friend because Simmons, as an evidentiary hearing had shown, " given a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of his right to proceed, and his access to court otherwise unimpeded." Next friend was designed for cases where the real party in
301:
claim in federal court. Whitmore wanted to see Simmons' case appealed within Arkansas because he believed that if his plea in the federal courts was successful and he was granted a new trial in which he was convicted anew, during sentencing, his single murder would look far less bad than Simmons'
292:
Arkansas state law allowed the waiving of capital appeals so long as a separate hearing determined the competence of the condemned man. With Simmons' competence verified, his execution was to proceed when a fellow death row inmate, Jonas Whitmore, filed suit against the state of Arkansas both for
381:
While appellate review is, as previously decided, not required in non-capital cases, "the unique, irrevocable nature of the death penalty necessitates safeguards not required for other punishments," as "he core concern of all our death penalty decisions is that States take steps to ensure to the
296:
Whitmore had been sent to Arkansas' death row in 1989 for stabbing to death a 62-year-old woman and robbing her of $ 250 after she had let him into her home and fed him milk and cookies. Whitmore had exhausted his direct line of appeals within the state and was about to pursue a
385:
Whitmore, as a citizen, has standing because appellate review "protect society's fundamental interest in ensuring that the coercive power of the State is not employed in a manner that shocks the community's conscience or undermines the integrity of our criminal justice
356:
While Simmons had the right to appellate review, it did not violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on "cruel and unusual punishment" for Simmons to not be forced to request appellate review, and thus Whitmore had no cause for action as an interested member of the
352:
Whitmore's "hypothetical" claim of injury was rejected as Whitmore could not prove that Simmons' appeal would change the outcome of a future sentencing review for Whitmore. Furthermore, that mandatory appellate review of Simmons' case was not a right "granted to
389:
Simmons is unable to waive appellate review as a defendant cannot make a "voluntary submission to a barbaric punishment," just as "a defendant's consent to being drawn and quartered or burned at the stake would not license the State to exact such
287:
I, Ronald Gene Simmons, Sr., want it to be known that it is my wish and my desire that absolutely no action by anybody be taken to appeal or in any way change this sentence. It is further respectfully requested that this sentence be carried out
282:
of sixteen people and sentenced to death. Arkansas state law did not require appellate review of capital sentences, and Simmons chose to contest neither the conviction nor the sentence, in fact, requesting a speedy execution:
857: 867: 267:
unless there is a prior relationship to the appellant and unless the appellant is "unable to litigate his own cause due to mental incapacity, lack of access to court, or other similar disability".
260: 234: 125: 778: 85: 256: 230: 121: 519: 459: 414:
to deny both Christian Peregrim, a private citizen, and Frank Dunham, a public defender for the Eastern District of Virginia, next of friend standing to request
862: 474: 872: 852: 744: 306:
He suffered injury by Simmons' lack of appeal and therefore the absence of Simmons' murder being considered during comparative review.
238: 38: 361:
interest is "unable to litigate his own cause due to mental incapacity, lack of access to court, or other similar disability".
333:
On March 15, 1989, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay of execution for Whitmore to give time for it to consider his case.
312:
Whitmore also filed as next friend to Simmons, trying to force, in Simmons' name, the appeal that Simmons himself refused.
688: 515: 455: 330:
In 1989, the Arkansas Supreme Court, citing Franz's petition, rejected Whitmore's motion to intervene in Simmons' case.
309:
Lack of appellate review violated the Constitution's protections against cruel and unusual punishment and due process.
302:
massacre of sixteen. Whitmore's attempt to force Simmons's case into appeal was three-pronged, arguing that:
263:
do not require mandatory appellate review of death penalty cases and that individuals cannot file cases as a
374: 825: 560: 66: 183: 151: 534: 782: 499: 439: 77: 807: 798: 275: 108: 662: 509: 449: 336:
On March 30, 1989, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued a stay of execution.
501:
Rev Louis J. Franz, Individually and as Next Friend of Ronald Gene Simmons v. State of Arkansas
441:
Rev Louis J. Franz, Individually and as Next Friend of Ronald Gene Simmons v. State of Arkansas
410: 370: 345: 175: 163: 143: 654: 611: 195: 789: 816: 187: 171: 718: 585: 846: 298: 696: 642: 242: 80: 419: 279: 264: 159: 96: 92: 834: 689:"Trail of Terror: 25 Years After The Ronald Gene Simmons Murders Part 1" 212:
Rehnquist, joined by White, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy
666: 422:, an American-born resident of Kuwait who was captured in Afghanistan. 399:
Ronald Gene Simmons was executed by lethal injection on June 25, 1990.
255:, 495 U.S. 149 (1990), is a U.S. Supreme Court Case that held that the 57:
Whitmore, Individually and as Next Friend of Simmons v. Arkansas et al.
719:"Arkansas Mass Murderer, Texas Killer Executed After Refusing Appeals" 658: 128:
do not require mandatory appellate review of capital sentences.
33: 858:
Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause and death penalty case law
612:"Whitmore v. Arkansas 110 S. Ct. 1717, 109 L.Ed.2d 135 (1990)" 408:
was cited in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in
475:"Arkansas Supreme Court orders stay of execution for Simmons" 745:"Arkansas Establishes Record By Executing 2 on Same Night" 344:
The Court ruled against Whitmore on April 24, 1990, with
868:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
224: 216: 208: 203: 132: 114: 104: 72: 62: 52: 45: 26: 473:Scripps Howard News Service (June 21, 1988). 402:Jonas Whitmore was executed on May 11, 1994. 8: 643:"Article III Limits on Statutory Standing" 23: 518:) CS1 maint: location missing publisher ( 458:) CS1 maint: location missing publisher ( 559:The Associated Press (March 17, 1989). 533:The Associated Press (March 16, 1989). 431: 16:1990 United States Supreme Court casess 507: 447: 21:1990 United States Supreme Court case 7: 377:. Justice Marshall concluded that: 348:writing for the majority of seven. 687:Trager, Lauren (October 25, 2012). 373:wrote a dissent that was joined by 293:himself and on behalf of Simmons. 39:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 863:United States Supreme Court cases 785:149 (1990) is available from: 586:"Simmons Execution Stayed Again" 32: 641:Roberts, John G. (April 1993). 561:"Execution Halted Indefinitely" 873:1990 in United States case law 853:Capital punishment in Arkansas 1: 535:"High Court Blocks Execution" 220:Marshall, joined by Brennan 889: 835:Oyez (oral argument audio) 504:. 296 Arkansas 181. 1988. 444:. 296 Arkansas 111. 1988. 229: 137: 119: 31: 514:: CS1 maint: location ( 454:: CS1 maint: location ( 616:Capital Defense Journal 346:Chief Justice Rehnquist 317:Petition by Louis Franz 231:U.S. Const. amend. VIII 46:Argued January 10, 1990 290: 152:William J. Brennan Jr. 48:Decided April 24, 1990 622:(1). November 1, 1990 479:The Houston Chronicle 285: 278:was convicted of the 261:Fourteenth Amendments 126:Fourteenth Amendments 91:110 S. Ct. 1717; 109 775:Whitmore v. Arkansas 723:The Associated Press 590:The Associated Press 340:Opinion of the Court 326:Petition by Whitmore 252:Whitmore v. Arkansas 27:Whitmore v. Arkansas 826:Library of Congress 699:on January 17, 2013 276:Ronald Gene Simmons 184:Sandra Day O'Connor 749:The New York Times 565:The New York Times 539:The New York Times 148:Associate Justices 411:Hamdi v. Rumsfeld 248: 247: 164:Thurgood Marshall 144:William Rehnquist 880: 839: 833: 830: 824: 821: 815: 812: 806: 803: 797: 794: 788: 761: 760: 758: 756: 741: 735: 734: 732: 730: 715: 709: 708: 706: 704: 695:. Archived from 684: 678: 677: 675: 673: 653:(6): 1219โ€“1232. 638: 632: 631: 629: 627: 608: 602: 601: 599: 597: 592:. March 30, 1989 582: 576: 575: 573: 571: 556: 550: 549: 547: 545: 530: 524: 523: 513: 505: 496: 490: 489: 487: 485: 470: 464: 463: 453: 445: 436: 371:Justice Marshall 133:Court membership 36: 35: 24: 888: 887: 883: 882: 881: 879: 878: 877: 843: 842: 837: 831: 828: 822: 819: 813: 810: 804: 801: 795: 792: 786: 770: 765: 764: 754: 752: 743: 742: 738: 728: 726: 725:. June 26, 1990 717: 716: 712: 702: 700: 686: 685: 681: 671: 669: 659:10.2307/1372783 647:Duke Law Review 640: 639: 635: 625: 623: 610: 609: 605: 595: 593: 584: 583: 579: 569: 567: 558: 557: 553: 543: 541: 532: 531: 527: 506: 498: 497: 493: 483: 481: 472: 471: 467: 446: 438: 437: 433: 428: 397: 375:Justice Brennan 368: 342: 328: 319: 273: 196:Anthony Kennedy 186: 176:John P. Stevens 174: 162: 100: 47: 41: 22: 17: 12: 11: 5: 886: 884: 876: 875: 870: 865: 860: 855: 845: 844: 841: 840: 808:Google Scholar 769: 768:External links 766: 763: 762: 751:. May 13, 1994 736: 710: 679: 633: 603: 577: 551: 525: 491: 465: 430: 429: 427: 424: 396: 393: 392: 391: 387: 383: 367: 364: 363: 362: 358: 354: 341: 338: 327: 324: 318: 315: 314: 313: 310: 307: 288:expeditiously. 272: 269: 246: 245: 239:28 U.S.C. 227: 226: 222: 221: 218: 214: 213: 210: 206: 205: 201: 200: 199: 198: 188:Antonin Scalia 172:Harry Blackmun 149: 146: 141: 135: 134: 130: 129: 117: 116: 112: 111: 106: 102: 101: 90: 74: 70: 69: 64: 60: 59: 54: 53:Full case name 50: 49: 43: 42: 37: 29: 28: 20: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 885: 874: 871: 869: 866: 864: 861: 859: 856: 854: 851: 850: 848: 836: 827: 818: 809: 800: 799:CourtListener 791: 784: 780: 776: 772: 771: 767: 750: 746: 740: 737: 724: 720: 714: 711: 698: 694: 690: 683: 680: 668: 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 644: 637: 634: 621: 617: 613: 607: 604: 591: 587: 581: 578: 566: 562: 555: 552: 540: 536: 529: 526: 521: 517: 511: 503: 502: 495: 492: 480: 476: 469: 466: 461: 457: 451: 443: 442: 435: 432: 425: 423: 421: 417: 413: 412: 407: 403: 400: 394: 390:punishments." 388: 384: 380: 379: 378: 376: 372: 365: 359: 355: 351: 350: 349: 347: 339: 337: 334: 331: 325: 323: 316: 311: 308: 305: 304: 303: 300: 299:habeas corpus 294: 289: 284: 281: 277: 270: 268: 266: 262: 258: 254: 253: 244: 240: 236: 232: 228: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 204:Case opinions 202: 197: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 150: 147: 145: 142: 140:Chief Justice 139: 138: 136: 131: 127: 123: 118: 113: 110: 109:Oral argument 107: 103: 98: 94: 88: 87: 82: 79: 75: 71: 68: 65: 61: 58: 55: 51: 44: 40: 30: 25: 19: 774: 755:November 23, 753:. Retrieved 748: 739: 727:. Retrieved 722: 713: 703:November 23, 701:. Retrieved 697:the original 692: 682: 672:November 23, 670:. Retrieved 650: 646: 636: 626:November 23, 624:. Retrieved 619: 615: 606: 594:. Retrieved 589: 580: 568:. Retrieved 564: 554: 542:. Retrieved 538: 528: 500: 494: 482:. Retrieved 478: 468: 440: 434: 415: 409: 405: 404: 401: 398: 369: 353:personally." 343: 335: 332: 329: 320: 295: 291: 286: 274: 251: 250: 249: 225:Laws applied 191: 179: 167: 155: 84: 56: 18: 729:December 1, 596:December 1, 570:December 1, 544:December 1, 484:December 1, 420:Yaser Hamdi 418:relief for 280:mass murder 265:next friend 243:ยง 2242 160:Byron White 847:Categories 426:References 271:Background 97:U.S. LEXIS 95:135; 1990 63:Docket no. 510:cite book 450:cite book 395:Aftermath 93:L. Ed. 2d 73:Citations 773:Text of 406:Whitmore 386:system." 259:and the 209:Majority 124:and the 105:Argument 790:Cornell 667:1372783 366:Dissent 357:public. 217:Dissent 115:Holding 67:88-7146 838:  832:  829:  823:  820:  817:Justia 814:  811:  805:  802:  796:  793:  787:  693:KARK-4 665:  416:habeas 257:Eighth 241:  194: 192:· 190:  182: 180:· 178:  170: 168:· 166:  158: 156:· 154:  122:Eighth 781: 663:JSTOR 783:U.S. 757:2012 731:2012 705:2012 674:2012 628:2012 598:2012 572:2012 546:2012 520:link 516:link 486:2012 460:link 456:link 120:The 99:2182 86:more 78:U.S. 76:495 779:495 655:doi 235:XIV 81:149 849:: 777:, 747:. 721:. 691:. 661:. 651:42 649:. 645:. 618:. 614:. 588:. 563:. 537:. 512:}} 508:{{ 477:. 452:}} 448:{{ 237:, 233:, 759:. 733:. 707:. 676:. 657:: 630:. 620:3 600:. 574:. 548:. 522:) 488:. 462:) 89:) 83:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
88-7146
U.S.
149
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
Oral argument
Eighth
Fourteenth Amendments
William Rehnquist
William J. Brennan Jr.
Byron White
Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun
John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
U.S. Const. amend. VIII
XIV
28 U.S.C.
ยง 2242
Eighth
Fourteenth Amendments
next friend
Ronald Gene Simmons
mass murder
habeas corpus
Chief Justice Rehnquist

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘