20:
19:
69:,” wherein one privately speculates which attendees at a social gathering could conceivably “go Nazi” under the proper political or social circumstances. She posits that support for Nazism is not formed on the basis of class, nationality, or race, but that the ideology “appeals to a certain type of mind.”
87:
Thompson concludes that individuals most likely to go Nazi are those who are ruthless and cerebral, are embittered by their circumstances, are easily deceived, and/or would opportunistically seek to be close to power if Nazism was ascendant, summarizing that "the frustrated and humiliated
460:
88:
intellectual, the rich and scared speculator, the spoiled son, the labor tyrant, the fellow who has achieved success by smelling out the wind of success—they would all go Nazi in a crisis."
72:
She demonstrates the game by describing the well-heeled attendees of an imagined party, the majority of whom are denoted by letters. Characters such as “Mr. C”, a socially alienated
49:
in 1941. The essay examines a series of fictional characters who possess varying personalities, social statuses, and upbringings, and attempts to determine whether they would “go
495:
102:
writing that “eight decades later, Thompson’s inquiry still has the media industry in knots.” The essay has been praised for its continued political relevance, with
241:
106:
re-publishing “Who Goes Nazi?” in 2017 and noting that it is “unfortunately starting to feel new again.” The essay has received a mixed reception among
480:
485:
490:
475:
120:
as a “timeless analysis of the authoritarian mentality” and “disturbingly relevant reading today,” while Scott
Beauchamp of
53:” – that is, whether they would support a mainstream Nazi political movement despite not subscribing to a Nazi or otherwise
80:,” would go Nazi so that he could “rise to such an eminence that no one can ever again humiliate him,” while subservient
470:
455:
77:
374:
147:
315:
122:
465:
134:
338:
282:
405:
157:
138:
369:
310:
214:
145:
and other far-right movements more broadly. Tributes and parodies of the essay have been published in
450:
434:
246:
191:
45:
107:
400:
96:“Who Goes Nazi?” is regarded as one of Thompson's most influential essays, with Nick Martin of
287:
116:
126:
criticized it as the “ur-text of fascist paranoia” and an example of the equivocation of all
219:
182:
98:
40:
24:
84:“Mrs. E” would go Nazi for a politician “who proclaims the basic subordination of women.”
278:
111:
76:
advisor who in school “took all the scholastic honors but was never invited to join a
444:
429:
186:
127:
81:
73:
66:
133:
The essay has been referenced by contemporary media outlets in coverage of the
142:
251:
54:
50:
36:
18:
343:
65:Thompson frames the essay as a “somewhat macabre
461:Works originally published in Harper's Magazine
8:
394:
392:
177:
175:
173:
496:American political philosophy literature
339:"In the Maze: Must history have losers?"
273:
271:
269:
135:2016 United States presidential election
215:"You Know What Tucker Carlson Believes"
169:
110:commentators; conservative journalist
7:
363:
361:
309:Beauchamp, Scott (12 October 2017).
14:
213:Martin, Nick (17 December 2019).
337:Tortorici, Dayna (Winter 2018).
370:"Who Goes Nazi? Office Edition"
141:, as well in commentary on the
401:"Who goes Nazi? Media edition"
1:
481:Works about American politics
399:Finnegan, Leah (2 May 2017).
486:Works about White Americans
512:
368:Gold, Lyta (6 June 2019).
43:, originally published in
491:1941 in American politics
316:The American Conservative
123:The American Conservative
23:"Who Goes Nazi?" author
130:ideology with Nazism.
39:by American journalist
311:"'Who Goes Nazi' Now?"
28:
476:Essays about politics
139:Unite the Right rally
114:praised the essay in
22:
281:(2 November 2016).
471:Anti-fascist works
456:Works about Nazism
29:
435:Harper's Magazine
283:"Who Goes Trump?"
254:. 29 January 2017
247:Harper's Magazine
192:Harper's Magazine
183:Thompson, Dorothy
46:Harper's Magazine
503:
430:"Who Goes Nazi?"
418:
417:
415:
413:
396:
387:
386:
384:
382:
365:
356:
355:
353:
351:
334:
328:
327:
325:
323:
306:
300:
299:
297:
295:
275:
264:
263:
261:
259:
242:"Who Goes Nazi?"
238:
232:
231:
229:
227:
220:The New Republic
210:
204:
203:
201:
199:
187:"Who Goes Nazi?"
179:
99:The New Republic
41:Dorothy Thompson
25:Dorothy Thompson
511:
510:
506:
505:
504:
502:
501:
500:
466:American essays
441:
440:
426:
421:
411:
409:
398:
397:
390:
380:
378:
375:Current Affairs
367:
366:
359:
349:
347:
336:
335:
331:
321:
319:
308:
307:
303:
293:
291:
279:Kirchick, James
277:
276:
267:
257:
255:
240:
239:
235:
225:
223:
212:
211:
207:
197:
195:
185:(August 1941).
181:
180:
171:
167:
148:Current Affairs
94:
63:
17:
12:
11:
5:
509:
507:
499:
498:
493:
488:
483:
478:
473:
468:
463:
458:
453:
443:
442:
439:
438:
425:
424:External links
422:
420:
419:
388:
357:
329:
301:
265:
233:
205:
168:
166:
163:
112:James Kirchick
93:
90:
62:
59:
33:Who Goes Nazi?
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
508:
497:
494:
492:
489:
487:
484:
482:
479:
477:
474:
472:
469:
467:
464:
462:
459:
457:
454:
452:
449:
448:
446:
437:
436:
431:
428:
427:
423:
408:
407:
402:
395:
393:
389:
377:
376:
371:
364:
362:
358:
346:
345:
340:
333:
330:
318:
317:
312:
305:
302:
290:
289:
284:
280:
274:
272:
270:
266:
253:
249:
248:
243:
237:
234:
222:
221:
216:
209:
206:
194:
193:
188:
184:
178:
176:
174:
170:
164:
162:
160:
159:
154:
150:
149:
144:
140:
136:
131:
129:
125:
124:
119:
118:
113:
109:
105:
101:
100:
91:
89:
85:
83:
79:
75:
70:
68:
60:
58:
56:
52:
48:
47:
42:
38:
34:
26:
21:
433:
410:. Retrieved
404:
379:. Retrieved
373:
348:. Retrieved
342:
332:
320:. Retrieved
314:
304:
292:. Retrieved
286:
256:. Retrieved
245:
236:
224:. Retrieved
218:
208:
196:. Retrieved
190:
156:
152:
146:
132:
128:conservative
121:
115:
103:
97:
95:
86:
82:antifeminist
71:
64:
44:
32:
30:
451:1941 essays
406:The Outline
158:The Outline
74:Wall Street
67:parlor game
445:Categories
412:27 January
381:27 January
350:27 January
322:26 January
294:27 January
258:27 January
226:27 January
198:27 January
165:References
108:right-wing
78:fraternity
57:ideology.
16:1941 essay
143:alt-right
92:Reception
55:fascistic
252:Facebook
137:and the
104:Harper's
35:” is an
61:Summary
27:in 1940
288:Tablet
155:, and
153:Tablet
117:Tablet
37:essay
414:2020
383:2020
352:2020
324:2020
296:2020
260:2020
228:2020
200:2020
51:Nazi
432:at
344:n+1
447::
403:.
391:^
372:.
360:^
341:.
313:.
285:.
268:^
250:.
244:.
217:.
189:.
172:^
161:.
151:,
416:.
385:.
354:.
326:.
298:.
262:.
230:.
202:.
31:“
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
