Knowledge (XXG)

Who Paid the Piper?

Source 📝

360:, former CIA official historian Thomas M. Troy Jr. wrote "Saunders deserves praise for presenting opposing views" and that she did "a fine job in recounting the intriguing story of how the CIA worked with existing institutions", but added that the book "has some major shortcomings" and "contains some silly mistakes and some real gaffes". Troy stated that Saunders "repeatedly returns to the theme that the CIA injured the cause of intellectual freedom by clandestinely supporting (oh, irony of ironies!) champions of intellectual freedom." Touching on what he perceived to be the books shortcomings, he wrote "despite Saunders's assertions that the CIA undermined intellectual freedom, she does not present any examples of people whose intellectual growth was stunted or impaired because of the Agency's programs" and mentioned that she failed to substantial discuss Soviet actions during the Cold War that would have helped readers to understand those of the CIA. While taking issue with the book's content and conclusions, Troy summarized "I highly enjoyed and strongly recommend her book". 310:
Jeffrey C. Isaac criticized the book, saying that it was "shrill" and with a "prosecutorial tone," that it had arguments without "nuance," that it did not "grapple in a serious way with the ideas that were the chief currency of those it purports to study", and that it did not consider the importance
281:
The Baumols concluded that the book has a lot of detail which is not necessary for Saunders' arguments and repetition that "gives the reader a sense of wallowing through a dense landscape, looking for the fascinating nuggets of history that are certainly there." The Baumols argued that, based on the
326:
Joffe criticised the book for equating the U.S. propaganda efforts with those from the USSR in a "a strident anti-anti-Communism that refuses to accord the Western cause the moral worth it deserves, considering the wares the totalitarians were hawking." He characterized the book as having "careless
277:
and its uses as propaganda is correct, if not wholly original". He said that "he dispiriting truth it reveals, or confirms, is that few of 'our' major intellectual and cultural figures resisted the blandishments of the CIA". He added that some of the information in the book is not "complete" or
306:
Gow wrote that even though the author had a negative attitude towards the CIA activities, the book has a "triumph" since "she shows men like to have been unsung heroes of the Cold War, as well as masters of art in both cultural warfare and cultural appreciation."
282:
contents of the book, the CIA had a "surprisingly benign" impact, in contradiction with what they believed Saunders would conclude, and that the book "suggests that role in the arts was considerably less damaging than might reasonably have been feared."
1144: 609: 85:
and expand American political influence. Saunders concluded that by entangling the state in "free" artistic expression, the CIA undermined America's moral position in comparison to the Soviet Union. In
273:
wrote that the book is "a major work of investigative history, an extremely valuable contribution to the all-important post-World War Two record" and that "the gist of her argument about
916: 323:
wrote that the book has portions that are humorous, citing reactions to figures who learned that they were subsidised by the CIA. He concluded that it was a "hammer-blow of a book".
565:
Draper, p. 17. "Stonor Saunders herself argues that in funding the Congress, the United States government put itself into a position very similar to that of its Soviet counterpart."
347:". William and Hilda Baumol, in their book review, wrote that Saunders "generally avoids explicit judgments, seeking to be dispassionate in her account." James Gow of 675: 631: 511: 909: 766:) - Paid access needed for entire article. Archived link includes excerpt and letters to the editor discussing this review, including one from Saunders. 855: 1100: 711:"Books: Guardian First Book Award: Who Paid the Piper: The CIA and the Cultural Cold War, by Frances Stonor Saunders." (Guardian Saturday Pages). 1159: 902: 763: 627: 544: 293:
as being the "most spectacular" book recently released about the involvement of CIA and intellectuals; Buhle stated that compared to
831: 822: 484:
Roazen, Paul. "Literary politics in the Cold War.(The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters)(Book Review)"
878: 1139: 444: 230: 1154: 237:, and other former CCF participants focused attention on the book after its American release. Left-wing publications such as 925: 396: 369: 74: 466:). "Rethinking the cultural cold war.(The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters)(Book Review)." 178:. Saunders focuses on the creation, activities, and downfalls of the Congress for Cultural Freedom and its the journal 840: 623: 468: 409: 184:. The book describes how the CIA set up fake foundations and used established bodies such the Ford Foundation and the 88: 70: 1008: 507: 344: 159: 851: 664:
Saunders, p. 129. "With this kind of commitment, the CIA was effectively acting as America's Ministry of Culture."
439: 348: 143: 295: 966: 96:
liberalism that raises important questions about the relationships between intellectuals and political power."
1057: 847: 614: 356: 154: 66: 28: 416:
Carroll, Mary. "The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters.(Review)(Brief Article)."
1149: 1095: 752: 747: 274: 251: 234: 201: 185: 391: 73:
efforts to infiltrate and co-opt artistic movements using funds that were mostly channelled through the
540: 449: 394:). "Frances Stonor Saunders (ed.): The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters." 191:
Among the books published and distributed with the help of the CIA, Saunders mentions translations of
987: 180: 1105: 1078: 1050: 973: 387: 1043: 883: 549: 486: 463: 225: 127: 121: 890:
Presentation by Saunders at the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, May 23, 2000
838:
Wreszin, Michael. "The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters. (Review)"
351:
stated that Saunders had a negative tone towards the CIA activities and a "churlish attitude".
944: 374: 257: 174: 134:
Saunders concluded that the activities of the U.S. were similar to those of the Soviet Union.
1029: 1001: 404: 286: 188:, to hide its funding of the Congress for Cultural Freedom and its other covert activities. 148: 93: 889: 874: 278:"fully accurate", in particular the chapter discussing the CIA infiltrating organisations. 1110: 1036: 1014: 939: 860: 196: 168: 78: 1064: 516: 431: 239: 163: 1133: 949: 477: 319: 314: 112: 713: 263: 82: 92:
Jeffrey C. Isaac wrote that the book is a "widely discussed retrospective on post-
829:
Sharlet, Jeff. "Tinker, writer, artist, spy: intellectuals during the Cold War."
390:
Center for Applied Economics); Baumol, Hilda (Consultants in Industry Economics,
1022: 894: 743: 536: 270: 206: 158:. It paid for the publication of thousands of books, including by the publisher 116: 328: 245: 211: 192: 980: 142:
Saunders writes that the CIA secretly subsidised the European tours of the
442:). "Who Paid the Piper? The CIA and the Cultural Cold War" (book review). 249:
gave the book a positive reception, while right-wing publications such as
418: 339: 125:, described the American title as being "more neutral". Paul Roazen, in 81:. The aim of these efforts was to combat the political influence of the 1071: 676:"The CIA funded a culture war against communism. It should do so again" 453: 407:). "The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters." 104: 820:
Romano, Carlin. "Cold-War Cultural Tactics Should Be a Hot Topic."
994: 610:"The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters" 456: 448:(Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 1 October 1999, 334:
Roazen described the book as "highly readable" and "fascinating".
109:
The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters
62:
The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters
898: 475:
Isaacs, Jeremy. "The CIA and the Cultural Cold War.(Review)."
223:
The book received media attention after its publication and
425:
Draper, Roger. "Summer Books: Secrets of State" (review of
131:, described the British title as being "more provocative". 311:
and the need to secure "liberal values and institutions".
1145:
Non-fiction books about the Central Intelligence Agency
303:
has fewer footnotes but more "charisma" and "verve".
261:
gave the book a negative reception. The book won the
101:
Who Paid the Piper? The CIA and the Cultural Cold War
56:
Who Paid the Piper? The CIA and the Cultural Cold War
1088: 958: 932: 42: 34: 24: 520:. November 1, 1999. Retrieved on April 18, 2015. 422:, April 15, 2000, Vol.96(16), p. 1505-1506. 561: 559: 553:. April 23, 2000. Retrieved on April 18, 2015. 910: 698: 696: 651: 649: 8: 786: 784: 774: 772: 19: 508:The CIA and the Cultural Cold War Revisited 917: 903: 895: 575: 573: 571: 435:, May/June 2000, Vol.83(2), p. 15-16. 69:. The book discusses the mid-20th century 18: 472:, Summer, 2002, Vol.49(3), p. 29(38) 343:described the book as having a "European 844:, Dec, 2000, Vol.28(4), p. 607-614 413:, Dec, 2001, Vol.88(3), p. 1152(2). 231:Organization of American Historians 2000 1101:American Committee for Cultural Freedom 738: 736: 532: 530: 528: 526: 499: 481:, 17 July 1999, Vol.283, p. 32(2). 107:(London). The American edition, titled 835:, March 31, 2000, Vol.46(30), p.A19(2) 603: 601: 599: 589: 587: 585: 490:, Fall, 2002, Vol.110(4), p.cxii-cxv. 7: 628:Center for the Study of Intelligence 748:"Hey, Mister, you want dirty book?" 400:, 2001, Vol.25(1), pp. 73–75. 14: 832:The Chronicle of Higher Education 823:The Chronicle of Higher Education 726:"The Guardian First Book Award." 730:. Friday August 27, 1999. p. 10. 674:Bunch, Sonny (2 November 2021). 119:, in a book review written for 16:Book by Frances Stonor Saunders 1: 1160:Congress for Cultural Freedom 926:Congress for Cultural Freedom 397:Journal of Cultural Economics 370:CIA and the Cultural Cold War 75:Congress for Cultural Freedom 608:Troy Jr., Thomas M. (2002). 299:by Michael Hochgeschwender, 99:The British edition, titled 852:Modern art was CIA 'weapon' 841:Reviews in American History 826:, March 3, 2006, Vol.52(26) 717:, September 25, 1999, p.11. 624:Central Intelligence Agency 410:Journal of American History 111:, was published in 2000 by 103:, was published in 1999 by 71:Central Intelligence Agency 1176: 296:Freiheit in der Offensive? 864:. Sunday 22 October 1995. 790:Baumol and Baumol, p. 73. 778:Baumol and Baumol, p. 75. 144:Boston Symphony Orchestra 848:Saunders, Frances Stonor 622:(1). Washington, D.C.: 615:Studies in Intelligence 541:America's Secret Weapon 357:Studies in Intelligence 354:Reviewing the book for 162:and Yugoslav dissident 67:Frances Stonor Saunders 29:Frances Stonor Saunders 1140:1999 non-fiction books 1096:Abstract expressionism 753:London Review of Books 440:King's College, London 349:King's College, London 275:Abstract Expressionism 252:The American Spectator 235:Arthur Schlesinger Jr. 186:Rockefeller Foundation 1155:CIA-funded propaganda 445:International Affairs 427:The Cultural Cold War 392:Princeton, New Jersey 160:Frederick A. Praeger 65:) is a 1999 book by 20:Who Paid the Piper? 1117:Who Paid the Piper? 1106:Anti-Stalinist left 1079:Transition Magazine 462:Isaac, Jeffrey C. ( 388:New York University 301:Who Paid the Piper? 291:Who Paid the Piper? 21: 884:The New York Times 550:The New York Times 487:The Sewanee Review 464:Indiana University 267:First Book Award. 226:The New York Times 166:. It financed the 128:The Sewanee Review 122:The New York Times 1127: 1126: 945:Michael Josselson 808:Carroll, p. 1506. 386:Baumol, William ( 375:Michael Josselson 258:National Interest 175:The Kenyon Review 52: 51: 1167: 959:Magazines funded 919: 912: 905: 896: 809: 806: 800: 797: 791: 788: 779: 776: 767: 761: 740: 731: 724: 718: 709: 703: 700: 691: 690: 688: 686: 671: 665: 662: 656: 655:Roazen, p. cxii. 653: 644: 643: 641: 639: 634:on June 13, 2007 630:. Archived from 605: 594: 591: 580: 577: 566: 563: 554: 534: 521: 506:Petras, James. " 504: 405:Brown University 337:Mary Carroll of 287:Brown University 94:Second World War 44:Publication date 22: 1175: 1174: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1123: 1111:Neoconservatism 1084: 1037:Partisan Review 974:China Quarterly 954: 940:Pierre Emmanuel 928: 923: 871: 861:The Independent 817: 815:Further reading 812: 807: 803: 798: 794: 789: 782: 777: 770: 742: 741: 734: 725: 721: 710: 706: 702:Buhle, p. 1153. 701: 694: 684: 682: 680:Washington Post 673: 672: 668: 663: 659: 654: 647: 637: 635: 607: 606: 597: 592: 583: 578: 569: 564: 557: 535: 524: 505: 501: 497: 383: 366: 327:sourcing" and " 221: 197:Boris Pasternak 169:Partisan Review 140: 79:Ford Foundation 45: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1173: 1171: 1163: 1162: 1157: 1152: 1147: 1142: 1132: 1131: 1125: 1124: 1122: 1121: 1113: 1108: 1103: 1098: 1092: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1083: 1082: 1075: 1068: 1065:Tempo Presente 1061: 1054: 1047: 1040: 1033: 1026: 1019: 1012: 1005: 998: 991: 984: 977: 970: 962: 960: 956: 955: 953: 952: 947: 942: 936: 934: 930: 929: 924: 922: 921: 914: 907: 899: 893: 892: 887: 881:) - Posted at 870: 869:External links 867: 866: 865: 845: 836: 827: 816: 813: 811: 810: 801: 792: 780: 768: 732: 719: 704: 692: 666: 657: 645: 595: 581: 567: 555: 522: 517:Monthly Review 498: 496: 493: 492: 491: 482: 473: 460: 436: 432:The New Leader 423: 414: 401: 382: 379: 378: 377: 372: 365: 362: 285:Paul Buhle of 240:Monthly Review 220: 217: 202:Doctor Zhivago 164:Milovan Djilas 146:and the films 139: 136: 50: 49: 46: 43: 40: 39: 36: 32: 31: 26: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1172: 1161: 1158: 1156: 1153: 1151: 1150:British books 1148: 1146: 1143: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1135: 1119: 1118: 1114: 1112: 1109: 1107: 1104: 1102: 1099: 1097: 1094: 1093: 1091: 1089:Miscellaneous 1087: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1074: 1073: 1069: 1067: 1066: 1062: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1046: 1045: 1041: 1039: 1038: 1034: 1032: 1031: 1027: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1011: 1010: 1006: 1004: 1003: 999: 997: 996: 992: 990: 989: 985: 983: 982: 978: 976: 975: 971: 969: 968: 967:Black Orpheus 964: 963: 961: 957: 951: 950:Shepard Stone 948: 946: 943: 941: 938: 937: 935: 931: 927: 920: 915: 913: 908: 906: 901: 900: 897: 891: 888: 886: 885: 880: 876: 873: 872: 868: 863: 862: 857: 853: 849: 846: 843: 842: 837: 834: 833: 828: 825: 824: 819: 818: 814: 805: 802: 796: 793: 787: 785: 781: 775: 773: 769: 765: 759: 755: 754: 749: 745: 739: 737: 733: 729: 723: 720: 716: 715: 708: 705: 699: 697: 693: 681: 677: 670: 667: 661: 658: 652: 650: 646: 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 616: 611: 604: 602: 600: 596: 590: 588: 586: 582: 579:Isaac, p. 29. 576: 574: 572: 568: 562: 560: 556: 552: 551: 546: 542: 538: 533: 531: 529: 527: 523: 519: 518: 513: 509: 503: 500: 494: 489: 488: 483: 480: 479: 478:The Spectator 474: 471: 470: 465: 461: 458: 455: 451: 447: 446: 441: 437: 434: 433: 428: 424: 421: 420: 415: 412: 411: 406: 403:Buhle, Paul ( 402: 399: 398: 393: 389: 385: 384: 380: 376: 373: 371: 368: 367: 363: 361: 359: 358: 352: 350: 346: 345:point of view 342: 341: 335: 332: 330: 324: 322: 321: 320:The Spectator 316: 315:Jeremy Isaacs 312: 308: 304: 302: 298: 297: 292: 288: 283: 279: 276: 272: 268: 266: 265: 260: 259: 254: 253: 248: 247: 242: 241: 236: 232: 228: 227: 218: 216: 214: 213: 208: 204: 203: 198: 194: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 176: 171: 170: 165: 161: 157: 156: 151: 150: 145: 137: 135: 132: 130: 129: 124: 123: 118: 114: 113:The New Press 110: 106: 102: 97: 95: 91: 90: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 58: 57: 47: 41: 37: 33: 30: 27: 23: 1116: 1115: 1077: 1070: 1063: 1056: 1049: 1042: 1035: 1030:Paris Review 1028: 1021: 1015: 1007: 1000: 993: 986: 979: 972: 965: 882: 859: 839: 830: 821: 804: 795: 760:(19): 54–56. 757: 751: 744:Said, Edward 728:The Guardian 727: 722: 714:The Guardian 712: 707: 683:. Retrieved 679: 669: 660: 636:. Retrieved 632:the original 619: 613: 593:Gow, p. 848. 548: 537:Joffe, Josef 515: 502: 485: 476: 467: 454:Available at 443: 438:Gow, James ( 430: 426: 417: 408: 395: 355: 353: 338: 336: 333: 325: 318: 313: 309: 305: 300: 294: 290: 284: 280: 269: 262: 256: 250: 244: 238: 224: 222: 210: 200: 190: 179: 173: 167: 153: 147: 141: 133: 126: 120: 108: 105:Granta Books 100: 98: 87: 83:Soviet Union 61: 60: 59:(U.S. title 55: 54: 53: 1023:Mundo Nuevo 875:Chapter One 685:7 September 271:Edward Said 207:Machiavelli 155:Animal Farm 117:Josef Joffe 1134:Categories 933:Key people 381:References 329:ad hominem 289:described 246:The Nation 212:The Prince 195:’s poems, 193:T.S. Eliot 1016:Der Monat 988:Encounter 981:Cuadernos 450:Vol.75(4) 219:Reception 181:Encounter 1051:Quadrant 746:(1999). 419:Booklist 364:See also 340:Booklist 331:slurs". 264:Guardian 77:and the 35:Language 1072:Tilanne 1044:Preuves 1009:Minerva 879:Archive 856:Archive 799:Isaacs. 764:Archive 638:May 29, 545:Archive 512:Archive 469:Dissent 138:Content 89:Dissent 38:English 1120:(1999) 25:Author 1058:Quest 1002:Hiwar 995:FORVM 495:Notes 457:JSTOR 687:2023 640:2020 255:and 243:and 205:and 172:and 152:and 149:1984 48:1999 858:). 854:" ( 850:. " 547:). 543:" ( 539:. " 514:). 510:" ( 429:). 317:in 209:’s 199:’s 1136:: 783:^ 771:^ 758:21 756:. 750:. 735:^ 695:^ 678:. 648:^ 626:: 620:46 618:. 612:. 598:^ 584:^ 570:^ 558:^ 525:^ 452:. 233:, 229:, 215:. 115:. 918:e 911:t 904:v 877:( 762:( 689:. 642:. 459:.

Index

Frances Stonor Saunders
Frances Stonor Saunders
Central Intelligence Agency
Congress for Cultural Freedom
Ford Foundation
Soviet Union
Dissent
Second World War
Granta Books
The New Press
Josef Joffe
The New York Times
The Sewanee Review
Boston Symphony Orchestra
1984
Animal Farm
Frederick A. Praeger
Milovan Djilas
Partisan Review
The Kenyon Review
Encounter
Rockefeller Foundation
T.S. Eliot
Boris Pasternak
Doctor Zhivago
Machiavelli
The Prince
The New York Times
Organization of American Historians 2000
Arthur Schlesinger Jr.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.