412:
The power of google! I kid. There are several markets that the single has played in, such as New York, Los
Angeles, Atlanta, Dallas, Miami (etc.) Even though, as discussed earlier, they're all owned by the same company, they all are eligible as national airplay. They're on each radio station website,
681:
So...if someone labels me as spam, when I just started using
Knowledge (XXG)...and if I do the same to someone else, it's considered vandalism? Instead of stalking my page, why don't we discuss this maturely instead of these warnings? And don't you dare label this as 'vandalism', because that's just
557:
I don't understand. This article complies with
Knowledge (XXG)'s rules for musician biographies. Bekker has received NATIONAL airplay. It's not just because he's important, but I believe this article should stay, because there is nothing wrong with it. Sure, it should be expanded over time with more
278:
Being played on-air 22 times by the local radio station isn't exactly national airplay. There are several radios stations listed, but they are owned by the same company, that uses the same website and the same database of artists.... Hehe, being played on the talk, country and classics
240:
Radio station websites are included as reliable sources. For an article to be valid on
Knowledge (XXG), any artist who has received national airplay on mainstream radios is considered eligible, proved with the resourced. Bekker Records does not constitute self-publishing.
696:
I also replied on your talk page which is where the past warnings have gone. Nobody has ever labeled anything you have written as Spam. A tag has been placed behind your name that is called SPA - Single
Purpose Account. Please read
293:
It isn't just local radio stations, even if they are all the same company that owns them. Bekker
Records is owned by Natasha Bekker, with artists such as Jac Harper and others. I suggest to do your own research before concluding.
614:
SOURCES ARE CREDIBLE. Does anyone listen? Why can't we just give the article some time to expand, instead of deleting it? Why don't you focus your energy on searching for more sources and expanding the article? I don't get it.
644:. I think we should stay with the article in question for a certain period of time after which, if no changes are made (or there is nothing else significant to add), it should be considered for incubation or deletion.
170:
201:
16-yearold musician who has only self-published his music. No reliable sources can be found. No reliable sources in the article except to say his song was played 22 times on-air. Prod was contested.
218:
131:
60:. The closest criterion is probably #11: Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network, and consensus is that this person has not been placed in rotation by any
413:
which could be considered a valid source because they are not editable by the public nor the artist. They also are not social networking sites or other useless content. --
164:
56:. Just having been played on several radio stations associated with the performer, even if in multiple markets, is not sufficient to meet
588:
513:
439:
387:
320:
267:
17:
584:
509:
435:
383:
316:
263:
104:
99:
701:. When you delete tags from the article, this page and label other editors SPA who have thousands of edits, that is vandalism.
108:
562:"11. Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network." This clearly states he is eligible for an article. --
598:
per nom. Non-notable "musician", no credible sources to prove notability. The article itself appears to be self-promotional.
91:
361:
CO-founded. Not owned. There's enough national airplay to be eligible for a
Knowledge (XXG) article, you have no case. ;) --
279:
sister-stations would be a coup. Bekker
Records only artist is Lowell Bekker and is owned by him, that is self-publishing.
185:
152:
766:
36:
520:"per nomination" -- it means that he accepts the reasoning of the person who nominated the article for deletion.
765:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
338:
146:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
337:
links list in the article, "He is currently signed to co-founded Bekker
Records". He is self-published to an
751:
747:
728:
710:
691:
674:
653:
624:
607:
571:
545:
527:
496:
480:
422:
407:
370:
350:
303:
288:
250:
230:
210:
142:
73:
724:
687:
620:
580:
567:
505:
492:
431:
418:
379:
366:
312:
299:
259:
246:
95:
720:
683:
635:
616:
576:
563:
501:
488:
427:
414:
375:
362:
308:
295:
255:
242:
192:
649:
524:
178:
87:
79:
702:
342:
280:
222:
202:
334:
743:
706:
538:
473:
400:
346:
330:
284:
226:
206:
69:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
641:
559:
57:
49:
327:
739:
698:
158:
53:
603:
670:
645:
521:
532:
I agree with the nominator's rationale for nominating the article for deletion. —
535:
470:
397:
65:
125:
599:
666:
665:- No coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. --
394:
What other markets did it play in, and how can we verify that? —
759:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
219:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
121:
117:
113:
177:
191:
558:sources, but it shouldn't be deleted immediately.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
769:). No further edits should be made to this page.
48:. Consensus is that this person does not meet
640:Sources are reliable and it does comply with
8:
217:Note: This debate has been included in the
216:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
64:(emphasis added) radio network.
752:10:44, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
729:00:01, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
711:23:58, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
692:22:39, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
675:16:00, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
654:18:07, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
625:04:36, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
608:04:33, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
572:04:00, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
546:03:58, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
528:03:57, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
497:03:56, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
481:03:54, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
423:03:59, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
408:03:56, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
371:03:18, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
351:03:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
304:01:25, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
289:21:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
251:18:13, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
231:06:20, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
211:06:19, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
74:00:55, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
719:And I replied on my page. --
786:
762:Please do not modify it.
339:independent record label
32:Please do not modify it.
487:What does that mean? --
589:few or no other edits
514:few or no other edits
440:few or no other edits
388:few or no other edits
321:few or no other edits
268:few or no other edits
591:outside this topic.
516:outside this topic.
442:outside this topic.
390:outside this topic.
323:outside this topic.
270:outside this topic.
592:
541:
517:
476:
443:
403:
391:
324:
271:
233:
777:
764:
574:
543:
539:
499:
478:
474:
425:
405:
401:
373:
306:
253:
196:
195:
181:
129:
111:
44:The result was
34:
785:
784:
780:
779:
778:
776:
775:
774:
773:
767:deletion review
760:
534:
469:
396:
138:
102:
86:
83:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
783:
781:
772:
771:
755:
754:
732:
731:
716:
715:
714:
713:
678:
677:
659:
658:
657:
656:
628:
627:
611:
610:
593:
553:
551:
550:
549:
548:
530:
484:
483:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
235:
234:
199:
198:
135:
82:
77:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
782:
770:
768:
763:
757:
756:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
734:
733:
730:
726:
722:
718:
717:
712:
708:
704:
700:
695:
694:
693:
689:
685:
682:not right. --
680:
679:
676:
672:
668:
664:
661:
660:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
637:
632:
631:
630:
629:
626:
622:
618:
613:
612:
609:
605:
601:
597:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
573:
569:
565:
561:
556:
555:
554:
547:
544:
542:
537:
531:
529:
526:
523:
519:
518:
515:
511:
507:
503:
498:
494:
490:
486:
485:
482:
479:
477:
472:
467:per nom. —
466:
463:
462:
441:
437:
433:
429:
424:
420:
416:
411:
410:
409:
406:
404:
399:
393:
392:
389:
385:
381:
377:
372:
368:
364:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
329:
326:
325:
322:
318:
314:
310:
305:
301:
297:
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
277:
274:
273:
272:
269:
265:
261:
257:
252:
248:
244:
239:
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
214:
213:
212:
208:
204:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
133:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
106:
101:
97:
93:
89:
88:Lowell Bekker
85:
84:
81:
80:Lowell Bekker
78:
76:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
761:
758:
744:Stuartyeates
735:
662:
633:
595:
552:
533:
468:
464:
395:
275:
237:
236:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
61:
45:
43:
31:
28:
721:Beastphones
684:Beastphones
636:Beastphones
634:Agree with
617:Beastphones
587:) has made
577:Beastphones
564:Beastphones
512:) has made
502:Beastphones
489:Beastphones
438:) has made
428:Beastphones
415:Beastphones
386:) has made
376:Beastphones
363:Beastphones
319:) has made
309:Beastphones
296:Beastphones
266:) has made
256:Beastphones
243:Beastphones
165:free images
522:Antandrus
536:Jeff G. ツ
471:Jeff G. ツ
398:Jeff G. ツ
646:StephenG
585:contribs
510:contribs
436:contribs
384:contribs
317:contribs
264:contribs
132:View log
703:Bgwhite
642:WP:BAND
560:WP:BAND
343:Bgwhite
281:Bgwhite
276:Comment
238:Comment
223:Bgwhite
203:Bgwhite
171:WP refs
159:scholar
105:protect
100:history
66:Rlendog
58:WP:BAND
50:WP:BAND
740:WP:GNG
738:fails
736:Delete
699:WP:SPA
663:Delete
596:Delete
540:(talk)
525:(talk)
475:(talk)
465:Delete
402:(talk)
143:Google
109:delete
54:WP:GNG
46:delete
600:Keb25
335:radio
186:JSTOR
147:books
126:views
118:watch
114:links
62:major
16:<
748:talk
725:talk
707:talk
688:talk
671:talk
667:Whpq
650:talk
621:talk
604:talk
581:talk
568:talk
506:talk
493:talk
432:talk
419:talk
380:talk
367:talk
347:talk
333:the
328:From
313:talk
300:talk
285:talk
260:talk
247:talk
227:talk
207:talk
179:FENS
153:news
122:logs
96:talk
92:edit
70:talk
341:.
331:all
193:TWL
130:– (
52:or
750:)
742:.
727:)
709:)
690:)
673:)
652:)
623:)
615:--
606:)
583:•
575:—
570:)
508:•
500:—
495:)
434:•
426:—
421:)
382:•
374:—
369:)
349:)
315:•
307:—
302:)
294:--
287:)
262:•
254:—
249:)
241:--
229:)
221:.
209:)
173:)
124:|
120:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
72:)
746:(
723:(
705:(
686:(
669:(
648:(
638::
619:(
602:(
579:(
566:(
504:(
491:(
430:(
417:(
378:(
365:(
345:(
311:(
298:(
283:(
258:(
245:(
225:(
205:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
128:)
90:(
68:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.