1152:" by some. Before commenting or responding to comments (especially to Oppose comments with uncommon rationales or which feel like baiting) consider whether others are likely to treat it as influential, and whether RfA is an appropriate forum for your point. Try hard not to fan the fire. Remember, the bureaucrats who close discussions have considerable experience and give more weight to constructive comments than unproductive ones.
507:
463:
1212:. Do not close any requests that you have taken part in, or those that have even a slim chance of passing, unless you are the candidate and you are withdrawing your application. In the case of vandalism, improper formatting, or a declined or withdrawn nomination, non-bureaucrats may also delist a nomination. A list of procedures to close an RfA may be found at
772:
and can be reverted by other administrators just as other edits can be, the actions of administrators involve features that can affect the entire site. Among other functions, administrators are responsible for blocking users from editing, controlling page protection, and deleting pages. However, they
979:
The community grants administrator access to trusted users, so nominees should have been on
Knowledge long enough for people to determine whether they are trustworthy. Administrators are held to high standards of conduct because other editors often turn to them for help and advice, and because they
1147:
The RfA process attracts many
Wikipedians and some may routinely oppose many or most requests; other editors routinely support many or most requests. Although the community currently endorses the right of every Wikipedian with an account to participate, one-sided approaches to RfA voting have been
1387:
The process for bureaucrats is similar to that for adminship above; however the expectation for promotion to bureaucratship is significantly higher than for admin, requiring a clearer consensus. In general, the threshold for consensus is somewhere around 85%. Bureaucrats are expected to determine
1139:
towards others in your comments. Constructive criticism will help the candidate make proper adjustments and possibly fare better in a future RfA attempt. Note that bureaucrats have been authorized by the community to clerk at RfA, so they may appropriately deal with comments and !votes which they
1169:
Most nominations will remain active for a minimum of seven days from the time the nomination is posted on this page, during which users give their opinions, ask questions, and make comments. This discussion process is not a vote (it is sometimes referred to as a !vote, using the computer science
1200:
In nominations where consensus is unclear, detailed explanations behind
Support or Oppose comments will have more impact than positions with no explanations or simple comments such as "yep" and "no way". A nomination may be closed as successful only by bureaucrats. In exceptional circumstances,
1262:
provides no rational basis for its position – or when the comment itself is a blockable offense. The text of the !vote can still be struck and/or redacted as normal. Monitors are encouraged to review the RfA regularly. Admins and bureaucrats who are not monitors may still enforce user conduct
1201:
bureaucrats may extend RfAs beyond seven days or restart the nomination to make consensus clearer. They may also close nominations early if success is unlikely and leaving the application open has no likely benefit, and the candidate may withdraw their application at any time for any reason.
1120:
follow-ups permitted. The two-question limit cannot be circumvented by asking questions that require multiple answers (e.g. asking the candidate what they would do in each of five scenarios). The candidate may respond to the comments of others. Certain comments may be discounted if there are
1216:. If your nomination fails, then please wait for a reasonable period of time before renominating yourself or accepting another nomination. Some candidates have tried again and succeeded within three months, but many editors prefer to wait considerably longer before reapplying.
1197:. In calculating an RfA's percentage, only numbered Support and Oppose comments are considered. Neutral comments are ignored for calculating an RfA's percentage, but they (and other relevant information) are considered for determining consensus by the closing bureaucrat.
1627:
1258:. In addition to normal moderation tools, monitors may remove !votes from the tally or from the discussion entirely at their discretion when the !vote contains significant policy violations that must be struck or otherwise redacted
1011:
If you are unsure about nominating yourself or another user for adminship, you may first wish to consult a few editors you respect to get an idea of what the community might think of your request. There is also a list of editors
1613:
Historically, there has not been the same obligation on supporters to explain their reasons for supporting (assumed to be "per nom" or a confirmation that the candidate is regarded as fully qualified) as there has been on
1098:
All
Wikipedians—including those without an account or not logged in ("anons")—are welcome to comment and ask questions in an RfA. Numerated (#) "votes" in the Support, Oppose, and Neutral sections may only be placed by
1106:. Other comments are welcomed in the general comments section at the bottom of the page, and comments by editors who are not extended confirmed may be moved to this section if mistakenly placed elsewhere.
1193:, RfAs that finish between 65 and 75% support are subject to the discretion of bureaucrats (so, therefore, almost all RfAs below 65% will fail). However, a request for adminship is first and foremost a
322:
996:
to succeed at gaining adminship. The community looks for a variety of factors in candidates and discussion can be intense. To get an insight of what the community is looking for, you could review some
1001:
720:
274:
186:
1186:
1075:
1543:
1182:
for promotion. Consensus at RfA is not determined by surpassing a numerical threshold, but by the strength of rationales presented. In practice, most RfAs above 75% support pass.
1254:
with the candidate, may not nominate the candidate, may not !vote in the RfA, and may not close the RfA, although if the monitor is a bureaucrat they may participate in the RfA's
1141:
962:
927:
893:
223:
1623:
1588:
1575:
1247:
875:
845:
1414:
632:
563:
317:
388:
1250:
to moderate discussion at RfA. The monitors can either self-select when an RfA starts, or can be chosen ahead of time by the candidate privately. Monitors may not be
1129:. Please explain your opinion by including a short explanation of your reasoning. Your input (positive or negative) will carry more weight if supported by evidence.
1410:
628:
559:
307:
302:
992:
on
Knowledge (500 edits and 30 days of experience). However, the community usually looks for candidates with much more experience and those without are generally
167:
37:
1528:
1033:
944:
201:
1443:
on their userpages – this is generally not seen as canvassing. Like requests for adminship, requests for bureaucratship are advertised on the watchlist and on
213:
1485:
1243:
269:
1480:
997:
909:
259:
254:
1533:
1474:
1050:
1029:
1021:
716:
196:
174:
1490:
1025:
624:
555:
241:
110:
790:
712:
708:
1376:. Bureaucrats can make other users administrators or bureaucrats, based on community decisions reached here, and remove administrator rights in
88:
1058:
making the nomination page. Nominations may only be added by the candidate or after the candidate has signed the acceptance of the nomination.
1421:
610:
541:
157:
41:
1503:
334:
1496:
1109:
If you are relatively new to contributing to
Knowledge, or if you have not yet participated on many RfAs, please consider first reading "
294:
1548:
1538:
1520:
1510:
1324:
1037:
1013:
206:
191:
179:
1554:
751:
365:
1645:
1444:
1255:
1110:
1083:
744:
743:
If you are new to participating in a request for adminship, or are not sure how to gauge the candidate, then kindly go through
375:
370:
329:
218:
45:
473:
360:
1655:
1650:
1079:
989:
774:
489:
429:
103:
33:
750:
There is an experimental process that you may choose to use to become an administrator instead of this process, called
1282:
1204:
If uncontroversial, any user in good standing can close a request that has no chance of passing in accordance with
485:
355:
1435:
for support is often viewed negatively by the community, some users find it helpful to place the neutrally worded
1205:
993:
493:
1624:
Knowledge:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I#Proposal 17: Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions
1331:
591:
524:
1514:
777:
and do not have special powers to decide on content matters, except to enforce the community consensus and the
765:
696:
132:
1576:
Knowledge:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I § Proposal 25: Require nominees to be extended confirmed
1122:
418:
96:
1601:
1320:
1126:
1017:
249:
122:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1213:
1175:
1162:
778:
737:
700:
692:
286:
1574:
Candidates were restricted to editors with an extended confirmed account following the discussion at
1432:
1086:. The watchlist notice will only be visible to you if your user interface language is set to (plain)
768:
are considered to require a high level of trust from the community. While administrative actions are
350:
1438:
1179:
1069:
398:
49:
1337:
1344:
1251:
1225:
1135:
1102:
660:
481:
469:
393:
383:
1587:
Voting was restricted to editors with an extended confirmed account following the discussion at
980:
have access to tools that can have a negative impact on users or content if carelessly applied.
699:(also known as admins), who are users with access to additional technical features that aid in
1209:
704:
513:
1333:
1149:
596:
593:
529:
526:
1335:
1509:
Requests to remove the administrator access of another editor due to abuse may be made at
1589:
Knowledge:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I § Proposal 14: Suffrage requirements
1005:
595:
528:
119:
Advice, requests for adminship (RfA), bureaucratship (RfB), and past request archives
1639:
1381:
477:
56:
1395:
1275:
17:
1523:– Failed proposals to create a community-based process for de-adminship processes.
1024:; a list of names and some additional information are automatically maintained at
769:
1020:
by a more experienced user to gain experience. They may also add themselves to
1451:
Please add new requests at the top of the section immediately below this line.
1628:
Knowledge:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Designated RfA monitors
1420:
At minimum, study what is expected of a bureaucrat by reading discussions at
1144:. Irrelevant questions may be removed or ignored, so please stay on topic.
1016:
nominating you. Editors interested in becoming administrators might explore
756:. It is approved for one trial run, which will take place in October 2024.
1171:
1132:
To add a comment, click the "Voice your opinion" link for the candidate.
1121:
suspicions of fraud; these may be the contributions of very new editors,
781:
rulings by protecting or deleting pages and applying sanctions to users.
1515:
Knowledge:Administrators § Grievances by users ("administrator abuse")
1388:
consensus in difficult cases and be ready to explain their decisions.
1409:
into it, then answer the questions. New bureaucrats are recorded at
795:
1040:
will let you evaluate whether or not you are ready to be an admin.
63:
on individual requests, which are located on subpages of this page.
1048:
To nominate either yourself or another user for adminship, follow
707:) or may be nominated by other users. Please be familiar with the
484:
administrators and bureaucrats are encouraged to enforce conduct
1278:
92:
1338:
597:
530:
501:
457:
65:
703:. Users can either submit their own requests for adminship (
1248:
designated administrators and bureaucrats to act as monitors
1391:
Create a new RfB page as you would for an RfA, and insert
512:
Proposals to reform the
Request for Adminship process are
1054:. If you wish to nominate someone else, check with them
1517:
and attempt other methods of dispute resolution first.
1352:
1294:
1233:
796:
675:
668:
649:
614:
579:
545:
446:
162:
150:
145:
71:
1178:
will review the discussion to see whether there is a
1502:
Requests to mark an account as a bot can be made at
1553:Requests for other user permissions can be made at
1163:
Knowledge:Bureaucrats § Promotions and RfX closures
1116:There is a limit of two questions per editor, with
343:
285:
234:
131:
1415:Knowledge:Unsuccessful bureaucratship candidacies
1140:deem to be inappropriate. You may wish to review
1174:symbol). At the end of the discussion period, a
32:"WP:RFA" redirects here. You may be looking for
1411:Knowledge:Successful bureaucratship candidacies
1319:"WP:RFB" redirects here. For bot requests, see
719:before submitting your request. Also, consider
1495:Requests for self-de-adminship can be made at
988:The only formal prerequisite for adminship is
645:Current time is 10:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
575:Current time is 10:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
38:Knowledge:Requests for administrator attention
1529:Knowledge:Miniguide to requests for adminship
1477:– RfA candidates sharing their RfA experience
949:
914:
880:
850:
104:
8:
1486:Knowledge:Unsuccessful adminship candidacies
1156:Discussion, decision, and closing procedures
1481:Knowledge:Successful requests for adminship
1142:arguments to avoid in adminship discussions
59:, non-extended confirmed editors may still
1263:policies and guidelines at RfA as normal.
817:
788:
603:
534:
468:Editors are reminded that the policies on
111:
97:
89:
1534:Knowledge:Guide to requests for adminship
1475:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Debriefs
1022:Category:Knowledge administrator hopefuls
80:Skip to current nominations for adminship
1491:Knowledge:Requests for adminship by year
1026:Knowledge:List of administrator hopefuls
478:make accusations about personal behavior
60:
1567:
1295:
821:
650:
580:
447:
1456:Current nominations for bureaucratship
723:about your chances of passing an RfA.
1422:Knowledge talk:Requests for adminship
814:
811:
808:
805:
42:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
7:
1504:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval
990:having an extended confirmed account
1600:The community determined this in a
1549:Knowledge:Request an RfA nomination
1539:Knowledge:Advice for RfA candidates
1521:Knowledge:Requests for de-adminship
1511:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case
1325:Knowledge:Referencing for beginners
764:The additional features granted to
1555:Knowledge:Requests for permissions
1497:Knowledge:Bureaucrats' noticeboard
1404:Your description of the candidate.
838:
214:Advice for asking questions at RfA
55:Note: Although this page is under
27:Process of the Knowledge community
25:
1462:There are no current nominations.
1323:. For help with referencing, see
1307:There are no current nominations.
1267:Current nominations for adminship
1380:. They can also grant or remove
1300:if nominations have not updated.
505:
492:, including—when necessary—with
461:
452:if nominations haven't updated.
48:, or requests for assistance at
1445:Template:Centralized discussion
1424:including the recent archives,
1185:In December 2015 the community
1084:Template:Centralized discussion
1078:, RfAs are to be advertised on
833:
823:
717:guide to requests for adminship
1393:
1368:) is the process by which the
1074:on their userpages. Also, per
828:
773:are not the final arbiters in
745:this mini guide for RfA voters
728:
691:) is the process by which the
476:apply at RfA. Editors may not
242:Requests for adminship by year
46:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests
1:
791:Recently closed RfAs and RfBs
57:extended confirmed protection
1413:. Failed nominations are at
1080:MediaWiki:Watchlist-messages
1066:Some candidates display the
709:administrators' reading list
34:Knowledge:Requested articles
1362:Requests for bureaucratship
1246:, the community authorized
1161:For more information, see:
729:requests for bureaucratship
514:currently under discussion.
187:Optional RfA candidate poll
1672:
1342:
1318:
1223:
1195:consensus-building process
1103:extended confirmed account
658:
621:
552:
424:Current bureaucrat count:
76:
73:
54:
31:
1038:Advice for RfA candidates
943:
908:
874:
844:
837:
832:
827:
822:
409:
192:Advice for RfA candidates
1372:decides who will become
1036:might be helpful, while
747:before you participate.
695:decides who will become
622:No current discussions.
553:No current discussions.
1428:seeking this position.
855:Withdrawn by candidate
753:administrator elections
366:Inactive administrators
1646:Requests for adminship
1513:, but you should read
1321:Knowledge:Bot requests
685:Requests for adminship
141:Requests for adminship
1378:limited circumstances
1256:bureaucrat discussion
1111:Advice for RfA voters
726:This page also hosts
413:Current admin count:
376:Desysoppings by month
371:Former administrators
330:Bureaucrat discussion
984:Nomination standards
779:Arbitration Commitee
760:About administrators
721:asking the community
1656:Knowledge processes
1651:Knowledge adminship
1370:Knowledge community
1094:Expressing opinions
1076:community consensus
1014:willing to consider
876:Significa liberdade
802:
693:Knowledge community
618:
549:
335:Bureaucrat activity
50:Knowledge:Help desk
18:Knowledge:ADMINSHIP
1051:these instructions
1006:RfA candidate poll
1004:RfAs, or start an
846:AirshipJungleman29
789:
604:
535:
480:without evidence.
314:Unsuccessful RfBs
266:Unsuccessful RfAs
224:Arguments to avoid
1544:Nominator's guide
977:
976:
640:
639:
571:
570:
519:
518:
500:
499:
456:
455:
439:
438:
219:Advice for voters
87:
86:
16:(Redirected from
1663:
1630:
1621:
1615:
1611:
1605:
1598:
1592:
1585:
1579:
1572:
1464:
1442:
1355:
1339:
1309:
1299:
1297:
1296:Purge page cache
1272:Current time is
1236:
1101:editors with an
1089:
1073:
951:
916:
882:
852:
840:
835:
830:
825:
803:
801:
799:
775:content disputes
678:
671:
655:
654:
652:
641:
636:
627:, recent RfBs: (
619:
617:
598:
584:
582:
567:
558:, recent RfBs: (
550:
548:
531:
509:
508:
502:
474:personal attacks
465:
464:
458:
451:
449:
448:Purge page cache
442:
441:
356:Adminship reform
299:Successful RfBs
246:Successful RfAs
126:
113:
106:
99:
90:
82:
81:
78:
75:
66:
21:
1671:
1670:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1622:
1618:
1612:
1608:
1599:
1595:
1586:
1582:
1573:
1569:
1564:
1471:
1465:
1460:
1458:
1436:
1407:
1405:
1401:
1384:on an account.
1359:
1358:
1351:
1347:
1341:
1340:
1334:
1328:
1317:
1310:
1305:
1303:
1293:
1288:
1269:
1244:2024 RfA review
1240:
1239:
1232:
1228:
1222:
1167:
1158:
1096:
1087:
1067:
1064:
1046:
986:
793:
787:
770:publicly logged
762:
705:self-nomination
682:
681:
674:
667:
663:
657:
656:
651:Purge this page
648:
643:
642:
623:
613:
602:
600:
599:
594:
587:
586:
585:
581:Purge this page
578:
572:
554:
544:
532:
527:
506:
462:
445:
440:
435:
405:
384:User rights log
339:
281:
230:
207:Self-nomination
175:RfA nominations
127:
120:
117:
79:
72:
64:
53:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1669:
1667:
1659:
1658:
1653:
1648:
1638:
1637:
1632:
1631:
1616:
1606:
1593:
1580:
1566:
1565:
1563:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1551:
1546:
1541:
1536:
1531:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1507:
1500:
1493:
1488:
1483:
1478:
1470:
1467:
1466:
1459:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1403:
1399:
1357:
1356:
1348:
1343:
1336:
1332:
1330:
1329:
1316:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1304:
1290:
1289:
1270:
1268:
1265:
1261:
1238:
1237:
1229:
1224:
1221:
1218:
1214:WP:Bureaucrats
1159:
1157:
1154:
1095:
1092:
1063:
1060:
1045:
1042:
985:
982:
975:
974:
971:
968:
965:
960:
957:
952:
947:
941:
940:
936:
933:
930:
925:
922:
917:
912:
906:
905:
902:
899:
896:
891:
888:
883:
878:
872:
871:
868:
865:
862:
859:
856:
853:
848:
842:
841:
836:
831:
826:
820:
819:
816:
815:Date of close
813:
810:
807:
786:
783:
766:administrators
761:
758:
740:are selected.
697:administrators
680:
679:
672:
664:
659:
638:
637:
611:bureaucratship
601:
592:
590:
589:
588:
573:
569:
568:
542:bureaucratship
533:
525:
523:
522:
521:
520:
517:
516:
510:
498:
497:
466:
454:
453:
437:
436:
434:
433:
422:
410:
407:
406:
404:
403:
402:
401:
396:
391:
386:
378:
373:
368:
363:
358:
353:
347:
345:
341:
340:
338:
337:
332:
327:
326:
325:
320:
312:
311:
310:
305:
297:
291:
289:
283:
282:
280:
279:
278:
277:
272:
264:
263:
262:
257:
252:
244:
238:
236:
232:
231:
229:
228:
227:
226:
216:
211:
210:
209:
204:
199:
189:
184:
183:
182:
172:
171:
170:
165:
155:
154:
153:
148:
137:
135:
133:Administrators
129:
128:
118:
116:
115:
108:
101:
93:
85:
84:
69:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1668:
1657:
1654:
1652:
1649:
1647:
1644:
1643:
1641:
1629:
1625:
1620:
1617:
1610:
1607:
1603:
1597:
1594:
1590:
1584:
1581:
1577:
1571:
1568:
1561:
1556:
1552:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1542:
1540:
1537:
1535:
1532:
1530:
1527:
1522:
1519:
1518:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1505:
1501:
1498:
1494:
1492:
1489:
1487:
1484:
1482:
1479:
1476:
1473:
1472:
1469:Related pages
1468:
1463:
1455:
1453:
1450:
1448:
1446:
1440:
1434:
1429:
1427:
1423:
1418:
1416:
1412:
1402:|Description=
1397:
1392:
1389:
1385:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1354:
1350:
1349:
1346:
1326:
1322:
1314:
1308:
1302:
1301:
1298:
1287:
1286:
1284:
1280:
1277:
1266:
1264:
1259:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1235:
1231:
1230:
1227:
1219:
1217:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1202:
1198:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1183:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1165:
1164:
1155:
1153:
1151:
1145:
1143:
1138:
1137:
1136:be respectful
1130:
1128:
1124:
1119:
1114:
1112:
1107:
1105:
1104:
1093:
1091:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1071:
1062:Notice of RfA
1061:
1059:
1057:
1053:
1052:
1043:
1041:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1009:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
983:
981:
972:
969:
966:
964:
961:
958:
956:
953:
948:
946:
942:
937:
934:
931:
929:
926:
923:
921:
918:
913:
911:
907:
903:
900:
897:
895:
892:
889:
887:
884:
879:
877:
873:
869:
866:
863:
860:
857:
854:
849:
847:
843:
804:
798:
792:
784:
782:
780:
776:
771:
767:
759:
757:
755:
754:
748:
746:
741:
739:
736:), where new
735:
731:
730:
724:
722:
718:
714:
710:
706:
702:
698:
694:
690:
686:
677:
673:
670:
666:
665:
662:
653:
646:
634:
630:
626:
620:
616:
612:
608:
605:Requests for
583:
576:
565:
561:
557:
551:
547:
543:
539:
536:Requests for
515:
511:
504:
503:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
460:
459:
450:
444:
443:
431:
427:
423:
420:
416:
412:
411:
408:
400:
397:
395:
392:
390:
387:
385:
382:
381:
379:
377:
374:
372:
369:
367:
364:
362:
359:
357:
354:
352:
349:
348:
346:
342:
336:
333:
331:
328:
324:
323:Chronological
321:
319:
316:
315:
313:
309:
308:Chronological
306:
304:
301:
300:
298:
296:
293:
292:
290:
288:
284:
276:
275:Chronological
273:
271:
268:
267:
265:
261:
260:Chronological
258:
256:
253:
251:
248:
247:
245:
243:
240:
239:
237:
233:
225:
222:
221:
220:
217:
215:
212:
208:
205:
203:
200:
198:
195:
194:
193:
190:
188:
185:
181:
180:Request a nom
178:
177:
176:
173:
169:
166:
164:
161:
160:
159:
156:
152:
149:
147:
144:
143:
142:
139:
138:
136:
134:
130:
124:
114:
109:
107:
102:
100:
95:
94:
91:
83:
70:
68:
67:
62:
58:
51:
47:
43:
39:
35:
30:
19:
1619:
1609:
1602:May 2019 RfC
1596:
1583:
1570:
1461:
1449:
1430:
1425:
1419:
1408:
1390:
1386:
1365:
1361:
1360:
1306:
1292:
1291:
1276:30 September
1273:
1271:
1241:
1203:
1199:
1194:
1190:
1184:
1168:
1160:
1148:labeled as "
1146:
1133:
1131:
1117:
1115:
1108:
1100:
1097:
1065:
1055:
1049:
1047:
1010:
1002:unsuccessful
987:
978:
959:23 Jun 2024
954:
945:HouseBlaster
919:
890:21 Sep 2024
885:
858:27 Sep 2024
763:
752:
749:
742:
733:
727:
725:
713:how-to guide
688:
684:
683:
644:
633:unsuccessful
606:
574:
564:unsuccessful
537:
425:
414:
399:Meta old log
344:Useful pages
318:Alphabetical
303:Alphabetical
270:Alphabetical
255:Alphabetical
235:RfA analysis
140:
29:
1374:bureaucrats
1127:meatpuppets
1123:sockpuppets
1044:Nominations
924:6 Sep 2024
738:bureaucrats
701:maintenance
625:Recent RfAs
556:Recent RfAs
295:Noticeboard
287:Bureaucrats
1640:Categories
1439:RfX-notice
1433:canvassing
1382:bot status
1274:10:30:02,
1234:WP:MONITOR
1191:in general
1187:determined
1176:bureaucrat
1070:RfX-notice
998:successful
955:Successful
920:Successful
910:Asilvering
886:Successful
806:Candidate
629:successful
560:successful
490:guidelines
482:Uninvolved
361:RfX Report
351:RFA reform
1614:opposers.
1562:Footnotes
1396:subst:RfB
1315:About RfB
1210:WP:NOTNOW
1180:consensus
1034:miniguide
1030:RfA guide
1000:and some
785:About RfA
661:Shortcuts
607:adminship
538:adminship
202:Miniguide
1400:Username
1345:Shortcut
1252:involved
1226:Shortcut
1220:Monitors
1172:negation
1150:trolling
1118:relevant
1032:and the
1018:adoption
994:unlikely
486:policies
470:civility
430:list all
419:list all
394:Meta log
250:By month
168:Archives
163:new post
158:RfA talk
1242:In the
1206:WP:SNOW
1134:Always
812:Result
389:Old log
61:comment
1431:While
1426:before
1406:~~~~}}
1398:|User=
1353:WP:RFB
1056:before
1028:. The
818:Tally
797:update
715:, and
676:WP:RFX
669:WP:RFA
615:update
546:update
494:blocks
123:search
1189:that
1125:, or
938:: -->
809:Type
380:Logs
197:Guide
151:watch
1626:and
1441:|b}}
1279:2024
1082:and
647:. —
609:and
577:. —
540:and
488:and
472:and
146:edit
1366:RfB
1283:UTC
1260:and
1208:or
1113:".
973:85
967:27
963:153
950:RfA
939:99
928:245
915:RfA
904:84
901:10
898:32
894:163
881:RfA
870:62
864:21
861:34
851:RfA
734:RfB
689:RfA
415:851
1642::
1447:.
1437:{{
1417:.
1394:{{
1090:.
1088:en
1072:}}
1068:{{
1008:.
970:8
935:0
932:1
867:4
711:,
631:,
562:,
426:15
44:,
40:,
36:,
1604:.
1591:.
1578:.
1557:.
1506:.
1499:.
1364:(
1327:.
1285:)
1281:(
1166:.
839:%
834:N
829:O
824:S
800:)
794:(
732:(
687:(
635:)
566:)
496:.
432:)
428:(
421:)
417:(
125:)
121:(
112:e
105:t
98:v
77:↓
74:↓
52:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.