815:
807:
823:
328:
factors to evaluate importance. A project's importance scale typically answers the question, "How important is it to
Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of this project's subject area that there should be an article for this topic". It is often assigned incorrectly. Thus an article on a minor but notable artist, river or movie may be rated Low importance since the subject is not particularly significant, but should be rated Mid importance since deleting the article would leave a gap in Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of the project's subject area.
167:
butterflies can see. But the article is just two paragraphs long. A general editor, busily working through a list of new articles, may give it a Stub rating because it is so short. B would be more appropriate. An article on a 19th-century physicist may give an excellent and well-illustrated overview of his life, but skim over the work for which they are known. The same busy editor may assign it a B rating because it is so long and thorough, but if most readers are more interested in the work than the person, it may be a Start.
699:
level of coverage for a minor village. An infobox with a picture and a better map would be nice, but these are not required. The article is mid-importance because the citations indicate that the subject has achieved notability, at least locally. It fills in minor details and may be of interest to readers other than social scientists who specialize in villages. Unfortunately, many reviewers would glance at the article, see just one paragraph on a small village, and give it Stub and Low importance ratings.
798:
most articles stay as Stub class for ever, or move to the Start class garbage can. A Start class article "... is quite incomplete ... might or might not cite adequate reliable sources ... is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent ... needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use." No sane editor would want to fix up a mess like that.
87:
612:
744:
279:
lowest rating of the three aspects. If an article's prose, style or coverage is Stub level, the article is Stub level. If it is not a Stub, but prose, style or coverage is Start level, the article is Start level. And so on. However, this may work poorly with Start class, which could describe a well-written article that just needs a bit more information to become C class, or a rambling, confused and unsourced essay that should be rewritten from scratch.
124:
108:. Assessments are useful if done right, but are often done wrong. Many articles are given lower quality or importance ratings than they merit based on the criteria. A common mistake is to assess short articles as stub or start class even when there is nothing more to be said about the subject, and longer articles as B (or higher) class even when there is much more to be said.
171:
physicist very important to the project, as opposed to a mundane butterfly or physicist. They must also understand the standard information to be recorded about butterflies and physicists, and know something about the more important subjects, so the presence or absence of the information tells them how complete the article is. The length of the article is irrelevant.
619:
994:
top-importance articles there are only 4,243 Stub articles and 17,346 Start articles. Stub and Start articles still account for most mid-importance subjects, and by definition do not meet the needs of most users. This may not be a serious concern if, as is often the case, importance ratings are unrelated to levels of reader interest.
35:
731:
records in 13 volumes between 1935 and 1939. Every birth, marriage and death is recorded, as is monthly weather, livestock numbers, crop yields, prices, building, road and irrigation works and detailed accounts of plagues, wars and rebellions. Several major academic books have been based almost entirely on the
990:
meet the needs of most users. This may not be a serious issue. A Stub class article for an obscure subject may slightly annoy the rare reader who is searching for information on the subject, but otherwise does no harm. If most searches find articles that are C-class or above, Knowledge (XXG) is working well.
735:, discussing what it reveals of different aspects of central European culture, history and economy. The Knowledge (XXG) article can never be more than a superficial overview of this huge trove of information. It cannot be considered "mostly complete" or "essentially complete", so must remain C class for ever.
754:
describes a smooth progression as an article moves step by step from Stub to
Featured Article. The reality is different. The normal life cycle is "create as Stub or Start, then stagnate". The life cycle of a few select articles is "create as C, stagnate, upgrade to GA or FA, stagnate." (Controversial
726:
The additional details may be of interest to readers, but are not needed to achieve C class, since the casual reader would not know the details were missing. With this additional information, the article may have reached B class, or even A class if no sources give further information on the village.
577:
These two scales are somewhat inconsistent, and a given project may have its own scale. The common factor is that an article is assigned importance based on an informed view of how important the article is to the project's subject area, and may be used to prioritise work by project members. Ideally
1001:
Educationalists have found students retain most interest in a subject when they score about 70% on tests. If they score much higher, they think the subject is boring. It they score much lower they think it is too hard, and may give up. Well-designed academic tests aim for a median score around 70%.
730:
To illustrate, suppose the village of
Slatsnovgrad was founded shortly after the Second Turkish War to house peasants subject to Slatsnovka Abbey. The monks kept detailed records from the foundation of the village up to the revolution of 1923. The Ruritanian People's Republic published the complete
698:
In this example there are no major problems with the prose and technical style, and most readers will not need more. Although there are still major gaps in information, the article tells the typical reader looking up the village on their phone all they want to know about
Slatsnovgrad. It gives a C
327:
The importance scale, also called the priority scale, is specific to a project. An article may be highly important to one project, less important to another. There is no "official" scale, and projects are encouraged to define their own, specialized scales. Different projects may consider different
997:
Chart 3 shows the distribution by importance of articles with quality GA and above. FA articles are most likely to be for top- or high-importance topics, while GA articles include more mid- and low-importance topics. There are relatively few A-class articles, perhaps due to the lack of reward for
797:
One may question the value of developing an article to GA or FA status in an attempt to satisfy the serious student or researcher. Would any serious student or researcher use
Knowledge (XXG)? Perhaps getting more articles up to C class, meeting the needs of most readers, gives greater payback. But
278:
Coverage is the main criterion in assessing Stub, Start and C class articles, but truly awful prose or severe technical issues can drag a rating down to Stub. With B and GA/A/FA, where coverage is mostly complete, quality of prose and technical style are more important. One approach is to take the
193:
The three are independent. A very readable article may be a hoax about a non-existent subject. A perfect article in terms of technical style may be poorly written and have major gaps. A professor may write the definitive article on a subject, but their
English is very poor and they see no need to
1031:
The fans of an obscure singer could set up a wikiproject devoted to that singer, with project-specific importance criteria that ensure the main article about the singer gets Top importance. However, since the project scope is very narrow and there would be few hits on the article, the
Version 1.0
989:
Chart 1 shows the distribution of articles with different quality ratings across the various levels of importance. Most articles are considered low importance, or have not had their importance assessed, and almost all articles that have had their quality assessed are rated Stub or Start: does not
788:
Bottom-feeding editors work through sets of Stub articles making the same enhancements to all of them, such as adding an infobox and basic data from a standard source. Their reward is knowing that they have added useful information to a lot of articles without doing any heavy-duty research. They
170:
To assess an article properly the reviewer should understand where the article fits in the spectrum of importance for the project, what information should be included in this type of article and what casual readers would be looking for. The reviewer must understand what could make a butterfly or
166:
Assessments should ideally be done only by project members, or at least should be reviewed by project members. An article on a species of butterfly may cover all that distinguishes it from others in its genus. The article is well written, well sourced and complete, as anyone who knows about
111:
An unjustified "stub class" assessment with no explanation may cause a potentially productive newbie to give up. However, an author may be blind to defects that a reviewer sees at once. Reviewers are therefore encouraged to give notes on the article talk page that state what they feel needs
298:
A Start class article does not meet the needs of the typical casual reader, our primary audience, but a C class article does, even though it may be quite incomplete. (A "casual reader" is curious enough to have clicked on a link to the article or searched for the title. They may not be the
290:
says of the FA grade, "it neglects no major facts or details ... a definitive source for encyclopedic information." Google's list of synonyms of "encyclopedic" includes "comprehensive, complete, thorough, thoroughgoing, full, exhaustive, in-depth, wide-ranging, broad-ranging, broad-based,
993:
Chart 2 zooms in to show the distribution of top-, high- and mid-importance articles. Average quality is better for top- and high-importance articles than for mid-importance articles since project members are more likely to focus on improving the more important articles. Of the 51,011
727:
The serious student or researcher may be dissatisfied, but the article is a fairly complete treatment of the subject. There is no more to be said without indulging in original research. This leads to a paradox: the more information is available, the harder it is to get above C class.
769:
The article now enters a stagnant phase where various editors tweak spelling, punctuation, categories, links and so on, but add little real content. Editors working on related articles may add a sentence or two of more substantial content, but will usually leave the assessment
762:
Soon after a bot has put the new article onto project lists, a new article watcher rates it if the creator has not yet done so. Stub and Start are much the most common quality ratings, and "Low" the most common importance rating. The ratings are often incorrect and often
286:, "Information should not be included in this encyclopedia solely because it is true or useful. A Knowledge (XXG) article should not be a complete exposition of all possible details, but a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject." However, the guideline
306:
If a short article gives all that has been published about the subject, it must be considered complete even if many questions remain unanswered. "Complete" measures how close the article comes to what is possible rather than how close it comes to the ideal. Thus
345:. Other projects have customized scales which may consider factors such as notability of article topics, relationship to a "main" article for the project, centrality to understanding the project's subject area, reader interest and expectations and so on. The
776:
An editor may take on the challenge of moving a C or B class article up to GA or FA status. There is a flurry of activity as editors add substantial content and make many copy edits, followed by approval of the upgrade. The article then becomes stagnant
681:
to the south. As of 2015 the population was 340, of whom 54% were female and 44.5% were under the age of 18. The economy is based on raising goats for milk, wool and meat. There is a shop in the village that sells ammunition, gasoline, bread, olives and
834:
as of 2017-05-17 follow. Where an article has been rated for quality and/or importance by more than one project, the highest quality and importance ratings are used. Thus an article counts as high importance if it is high importance for
578:
importance is assigned or reviewed by a project member. It should not be assigned based on a vague idea of how important the subject is in the wider scheme of things, or how important it is to readers. In the second quarter of 2017
349:
takes the interesting approach of breaking the project scope into sub-areas such as video games and series, in-game elements, companies, hardware and so on, and giving different Top/High/Mid importance criteria for each sub-area.
792:
Top-feeding editors browse among the B or C class articles, bringing them up to GA status, or try to bring GA articles to FA status. Their reward is bragging rights, and perhaps publication of "their" article on the front
377:
within the field of knowledge covered by the project (an estimate of how many sources discuss the subject in some depth) combined with an estimate of whether there is worldwide interest compared to purely local interest:
158:
tab by accident and see the article they were reading has a C rating. That seems like a rather mediocre grade for an article that gave them all they wanted to know. They shrug and move on. They will not click on the
495:
342:
115:
There may be more leverage in bringing many articles up to C class, where they meet the needs of most casual readers, than in bringing a few up to the very demanding standards of FA class.
491:
360:
does not assess importance at all due to the difficulty in comparing such things as 19th century
English history paintings, traditional Chinese porcelain and pre-Columbian architecture.
112:
improvement, preferably relating the notes to the project's assessment criteria, and authors should feel free to ask reviewers for more detailed feedback on what needs improvement.
1002:
If we take C-class or above as a success, only 10% of editors succeed. We are desperately short of new editors. Possibly the criteria are too rigorous or the scoring is too harsh.
143:
831:
318:
A long article may still be incomplete if omits significant available information, so falls short of what is possible, even if it meets the needs of almost all readers.
135:
1011:
498:
are based on how central the subject is to the field, which may roughly correlate with notability, but ignores geographical distribution of interest in the subject:
346:
401:
430:
Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field.
147:
475:
Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article.
773:
A Stub may be nominated for deletion, prompting a rescue job and an upgrade to C class. This is not what the deletion process is for, but it happens.
1053:
998:
taking an article to this level. If an editor is going to make the effort to bring an article up to A, they may as well take it all the way to FA.
840:
186:
Technical style: Does the article cite reliable sources to support what it says? Does it have appropriate formatting, wikilinks, categories, etc.?
487:
814:
494:
also looks at factors such as the number of page hits, links from other pages, and a score of how broad the project is. The definitions in the
283:
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
51:
555:
183:
Prose: Is the article well organized, easy to read and easy to understand, avoiding needless jargon, with no spelling or grammar errors?
751:
649:
287:
198:
160:
154:
Assessments are for project members, not for casual readers. Most
Knowledge (XXG) readers never see ratings, but some may click on the
131:
95:
806:
611:
524:
440:
544:
534:
514:
470:
455:
425:
354:
677:, at an elevation of 1,673 metres (5,489 ft) above sea level. It may be reached by a two hour drive over a rough dirt road from
139:
394:
445:
Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent.
102:
836:
822:
627:
460:
Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area.
1048:
387:
367:
335:
766:
The creator may continue to improve the article after the initial rapid assessment, but it is rarely re-assessed.
759:
Most articles on uncontroversial subjects are created with a series of edits, sometimes spread over several days.
294:
There is room for debate over what constitutes "complete" coverage, but three assertions seem uncontroversial:
374:
189:
Coverage: Does the article give detailed and in-depth coverage of all significant aspects of the subject?
55:
65:
755:
articles have a complex life cycle which is unrelated to quality assessments so not discussed here.)
706:
There is a ruined stone fort in the north of the village that was the birthplace and power base of
490:
to decide which articles to include in an offline edition of Knowledge (XXG). The editorial team's
179:
Quality ratings try to give a combined assessment of three quite different aspects of any article:
237:
May need improvements to organisation, grammar, spelling, writing style, jargon use and citations
43:
308:
780:
Few articles are upgraded to A status, probably because of the lack of a recognition mechanism.
86:
743:
127:
594:
combined. This factoid should not affect the importance ratings of these three articles.
123:
17:
1042:
1032:
Editorial Team article selection bot would give it a relatively low importance score.
587:
571:(Optional) Subject is a disambiguation or redirect page, residing in article space.
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
718:
supplies the village with water and hydroelectric power. ... The locally fermented
591:
583:
448:
433:
579:
300:
702:
The example meets the needs of most readers, but there may be more to be said:
664:
651:
604:
An example of a mid-importance article that meets the criteria for C class:
248:
May have problems with clarity, balance, flow, bias or original research.
846:
Counts of articles as of 2017-05-17 by quality rating and by importance:
463:
646:
Slatsnovgrad is in the northeast of Tslatzyn province at coordinates
478:
509:
The article is of priority or importance, regardless of its quality
496:
Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Release Version Criteria
343:
Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Release Version Criteria
742:
684:
122:
85:
256:
Mostly complete, may not satisfy a serious student or researcher
201:. GA and FA are similar to A: fairly complete and well-written.
29:
784:
Ratings are used by bottom-feeding and top-feeding editors.
710:(d. 1154), regent of Ruritania from 1143 to 1154 during the
561:(Optional) Subject has no real significance to the project.
315:, perhaps should be rated A. There is no more to be said.
234:
Some meaningful content, but most readers will need more
830:
Statistics for the English Knowledge (XXG) derived from
380:
312:
73:
1012:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Knowledge (XXG)/Assessment
1014:, where requests for article assessment can be posted
832:
Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Statistics
291:
all-inclusive, all-embracing, all-encompassing ...".
303:, but they are not an expert on the subject area.)
197:The table below summarizes the criteria given at
94:This essay discusses the criteria and purpose of
818:Chart 2: Top-, high- and mid-importance articles
519:Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia
245:Still major gaps, but useful to a casual reader
341:, while others refer to the definitions in the
331:Some projects refer to the scale documented at
395:
267:Essentially complete, very useful to readers
8:
722:is said to have aphrodisiac properties. ...
323:Importance ratings: a variety of definitions
284:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not
618:
549:Subject is mainly of specialist interest.
488:Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team
402:
388:
529:Subject contributes a depth of knowledge
363:The proposed default scale documented at
932:
852:
821:
813:
805:
500:
205:
52:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
1024:
347:WikiProject Video game Importance scale
98:, recorded in talk page templates like
752:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject assessment
288:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject assessment
199:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject assessment
175:Quality ratings: an awkward compromise
383:WikiProject article importance scheme
270:Well-written, clear, well referenced
7:
539:Subject fills in more minor details
486:Importance ratings are used by the
1054:Knowledge (XXG) article assessment
194:add citations to their own work.
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
839:even if it is low importance for
617:
610:
163:to find out what C class means.
33:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
223:Very little meaningful content
810:Chart 1: All non-list articles
313:rated Stub as of December 2017
148:WikiProject History of Science
1:
789:rarely change the assessment.
715:
711:
707:
678:
640:
565:
90:A highly important butterfly
841:WikiProject Anime and manga
1070:
373:is based on the subject's
119:By and for project members
63:
639:is a hill village in the
263:
252:
241:
230:
219:
214:
211:
208:
282:According to the policy
259:Reasonably well-written
226:May be incomprehensible
688:(fermented goat milk).
643:province of Ruritania.
355:WikiProject Visual arts
1049:Knowledge (XXG) essays
827:
819:
811:
748:
582:consistently got more
151:
91:
18:Knowledge (XXG):ARTASS
826:Chart 3: GA, A and FA
825:
817:
809:
746:
714:. ... The Soviet-era
631:Location in Ruritania
492:article selection bot
126:
103:WikiProject Venezuela
89:
54:, as it has not been
802:Statistical analysis
733:Annals of Slatsnovka
628:class=notpageimage|
410:
140:WikiProject Physics
96:article assessments
828:
820:
812:
749:
747:Article life cycle
739:Article life cycle
712:Second Turkish War
381:
309:Beornred of Mercia
215:Prose & style
152:
92:
987:
986:
983:
982:
927:
926:
837:WikiProject Furry
665:65.898°N 72.147°E
575:
574:
484:
483:
368:Importance scheme
336:Importance scheme
274:
273:
84:
83:
16:(Redirected from
1061:
1033:
1029:
933:
853:
849:
848:
716:Slatsnovgrad Dam
676:
675:
673:
672:
671:
666:
662:
659:
658:
657:
654:
621:
620:
614:
501:
411:
404:
397:
390:
372:
366:
359:
353:
340:
334:
206:
157:
132:Featured-article
130:is considered a
107:
101:
76:
37:
36:
30:
21:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1030:
1026:
1021:
1008:
804:
741:
724:
708:Borg the Greedy
696:
692:
669:
667:
663:
660:
655:
652:
650:
648:
647:
634:
633:
632:
630:
624:
623:
622:
602:
409:
408:
370:
364:
357:
351:
338:
332:
325:
177:
155:
128:Richard Feynman
121:
105:
99:
80:
79:
72:
68:
60:
59:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1067:
1065:
1057:
1056:
1051:
1041:
1040:
1035:
1034:
1023:
1022:
1020:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1007:
1004:
985:
984:
981:
980:
977:
973:
972:
969:
965:
964:
961:
957:
956:
953:
949:
948:
945:
941:
940:
937:
930:
928:
925:
924:
921:
917:
916:
913:
909:
908:
905:
901:
900:
897:
893:
892:
889:
885:
884:
881:
877:
876:
873:
869:
868:
865:
861:
860:
857:
856:Quality rating
803:
800:
795:
794:
790:
782:
781:
778:
774:
771:
767:
764:
760:
740:
737:
704:
690:
670:65.898; 72.147
626:
625:
616:
615:
609:
608:
607:
606:
601:
600:Sample article
598:
573:
572:
569:
563:
562:
559:
551:
550:
547:
541:
540:
537:
531:
530:
527:
521:
520:
517:
511:
510:
507:
482:
481:
476:
473:
467:
466:
461:
458:
452:
451:
446:
443:
437:
436:
431:
428:
422:
421:
418:
415:
407:
406:
399:
392:
384:
382:
324:
321:
320:
319:
316:
304:
276:
275:
272:
271:
268:
265:
261:
260:
257:
254:
250:
249:
246:
243:
239:
238:
235:
232:
228:
227:
224:
221:
217:
216:
213:
210:
191:
190:
187:
184:
176:
173:
144:Mid-importance
136:Top-importance
120:
117:
82:
81:
78:
77:
69:
64:
61:
49:
48:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1066:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1047:
1046:
1044:
1028:
1025:
1018:
1013:
1010:
1009:
1005:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
978:
975:
974:
970:
967:
966:
962:
959:
958:
954:
951:
950:
946:
943:
942:
938:
935:
934:
931:
929:
922:
919:
918:
914:
911:
910:
906:
903:
902:
898:
895:
894:
890:
887:
886:
882:
879:
878:
874:
871:
870:
866:
863:
862:
858:
855:
854:
851:
850:
847:
844:
842:
838:
833:
824:
816:
808:
801:
799:
791:
787:
786:
785:
779:
775:
772:
768:
765:
761:
758:
757:
756:
753:
745:
738:
736:
734:
728:
723:
721:
717:
713:
709:
703:
700:
695:
689:
687:
686:
680:
679:Tslatzyn City
674:
644:
642:
638:
629:
613:
605:
599:
597:
595:
593:
589:
588:United States
585:
581:
570:
568:
564:
560:
558:
557:
553:
552:
548:
546:
543:
542:
538:
536:
533:
532:
528:
526:
523:
522:
518:
516:
513:
512:
508:
506:
503:
502:
499:
497:
493:
489:
480:
477:
474:
472:
469:
468:
465:
462:
459:
457:
454:
453:
450:
447:
444:
442:
439:
438:
435:
432:
429:
427:
424:
423:
419:
416:
413:
412:
405:
400:
398:
393:
391:
386:
385:
379:
376:
369:
361:
356:
348:
344:
337:
329:
322:
317:
314:
310:
305:
302:
297:
296:
295:
292:
289:
285:
280:
269:
266:
262:
258:
255:
251:
247:
244:
240:
236:
233:
229:
225:
222:
218:
207:
204:
203:
202:
200:
195:
188:
185:
182:
181:
180:
174:
172:
168:
164:
162:
161:quality scale
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
118:
116:
113:
109:
104:
97:
88:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
57:
53:
47:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
1027:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
976:Not assessed
920:Not assessed
845:
829:
796:
783:
750:
732:
729:
725:
719:
705:
701:
697:
693:
683:
645:
637:Slatsnovgrad
636:
635:
603:
596:
592:World War II
576:
566:
554:
504:
485:
449:Factory Acts
434:Kindergarten
362:
330:
326:
311:, which was
293:
281:
277:
196:
192:
178:
169:
165:
153:
114:
110:
93:
41:
580:Darth Vader
301:average Joe
42:This is an
1043:Categories
971:2,850,796
936:Importance
915:3,265,699
907:1,910,101
770:unchanged.
763:premature.
691:References
656:72°08′49″E
653:65°53′53″N
414:Importance
375:notability
584:pageviews
212:Coverage
142:, but of
74:WP:ARTASS
1006:See also
979:173,301
963:654,866
955:169,008
923:552,983
899:356,458
891:183,764
641:Tslatzyn
464:0.999...
417:Criteria
66:Shortcut
947:47,938
883:44,953
867:10,837
420:Example
939:Count
875:2,296
859:Count
777:again.
556:Bottom
479:G cell
231:Start
209:Class
1019:Notes
904:Start
793:page.
720:kefir
685:kefir
586:than
220:Stub
156:talk
44:essay
952:High
912:Stub
694:•••
590:and
525:High
505:Need
441:High
968:Low
960:Mid
944:Top
661:/
545:Low
535:Mid
515:Top
471:Low
456:Mid
426:Top
146:to
138:to
134:of
1045::
880:GA
864:FA
843:.
668:/
567:No
371:}}
365:{{
358:}}
352:{{
339:}}
333:{{
264:A
253:B
242:C
106:}}
100:{{
896:C
888:B
872:A
403:e
396:t
389:v
150:.
46:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
