Knowledge (XXG)

:Administrator elections - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

80: 21: 239:. During this period, discussion is closed, and the page will be marked with a template indicating that discussion is closed. Candidates may be asked direct questions on their user talk pages, but they are not expected to watch their discussion page, nor the election page for the full period, to allow them a respite from community vetting. 255:
votes, and strike them as necessary. Once scrutineering is complete, votes are tallied, results are announced, and new admins are granted administrative privileges. The pass threshold is 70% or greater. The vote tally is calculated by Support / (Support + Oppose) for each candidate. The scrutineers
226:
During this 3-day period, the community can ask questions and raise issues, as well as provide positive feedback. Candidates are encouraged to participate in the discussion period, answering questions and responding to feedback. During this discussion-only time, no votes (nor simple expressions of
136:
software. A list of voters is available, but their votes are kept secret. The intent is to reduce the amount of contentious discussion amongst voters, thus making the process less antagonistic and increasing the number of candidates willing to volunteer to be administrators.
217:
Candidates sign up by a specified date prior to the discussion and questions period. Just like RFA, candidates can be nominated by other editors; please only do so with the candidate's consent. Only candidates who accept their nomination will proceed to the next period.
282:
The community supports trying this proposal for 1 election, after which it will be reviewed in Phase II. While there are concerns regarding the implementation details of this proposal, given this is a trial run, there is sufficient support to run the election as
101:(RfA), which has been the only way to become administrator on the English Knowledge (XXG) since 2003. The first trial election will be held in October 2024. After this trial, the community will discuss whether and how to proceed with administrator elections. 516:
As RfA is a consensus-based process, there is not exact threshold for success, but in practice a candidate with below 65% support is almost always unsuccessful, and above 75% almost always successful. Candidates with between 65 and 75% support are typically
208:
The overall process lasts 10 days: an initial 3-day period for discussion and questions, and a 7-day period for a secret ballot vote. Election cycles are advertised in advance, including watchlist notices. The process is supervised by the bureaucrats.
423: 460: 465: 161: 407:
If you'd like to receive a user talk message when important administrator election milestones are reached, such as when a date is chosen and when the "accepting candidates" phase opens, please
429: 504: 435: 277: 291:. After the trial, request for comment discussions will be held to discuss how to proceed, thus allowing the community to alter the process if desired, or choose not to continue. 454: 408: 157: 288: 35: 537: 287:
Accordingly, one election will be held, with implementation details (such as scrutineering) worked out based on discussions on this page's
28: 156:
on Knowledge (XXG) (500 edits and 30 days of experience). To get an insight of what the community is looking for, you could review some
98: 141: 153: 46:
for adoption. Thus references or links to this page should not describe it as policy, guideline, nor yet even as a proposal.
104:
The elections do not replace requests for adminship. Prospective administrators may freely choose which process to use.
227:
support or opposition) are cast. Personal voter guides are discouraged, and will not be linked to from election pages.
90: 505:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I § Proposal 25: Require nominees to be extended confirmed
487: 144:
declined year-on-year from a peak of 920 in 2007 to just 36 in 2016, and has since averaged around 23 per year.
94: 351: 43: 518: 51: 503:
Candidates were restricted to editors with an extended confirmed account following the discussion at
133: 247:
After voting has ended, the election will be scrutinised by three stewards whose home wiki is
39: 377: 252: 165: 34:
The proposal must not be taken to represent consensus, but is still in development and under
491: 257: 177: 455:
meta:Steward requests/Miscellaneous#Scrutineering of enwiki admin election in late October
436:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I#Proposal 13: Admin elections
430:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/2021 review/Proposals#Closed: 8B Admin elections
79: 27:
The following is a draft working towards a proposal for adoption as a Knowledge (XXG)
531: 356: 129: 448: 235:
Once the discussion period is complete, a secret ballot is held for 7 days, using
521:
about the consensus for their request, and outcomes vary on a case-to-case basis.
236: 251:
the English Knowledge (XXG). They will check for any duplicate, ineligible, or
265: 424:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/2021 review/Proposals/Admin elections
261: 180:
suffrage requirements. To vote, an editor must meet the following criteria:
461:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrator elections/October 2024/Subpages to create
451:- ticket to coordinate with WMF Trust & Safety to set up SecurePoll 466:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrator elections/October 2024/Detailed schedule
190:
have 10 live edits in the year running up to 1 month before election
93:– users with access to additional technical features that aid in 15: 78: 486:
Before June 2003 it was possible to request adminship on a
66: 59: 457:- ticket to coordinate with stewards for scrutineering 187:
have 150 mainspace edits by 1 month before election
184:
created their account over 2 months before election
272:Are additional RFCs required before the trial? 152:The only formal prerequisite for adminship is 8: 490:and some admins were appointed directly by 193:not be sitewide blocked during the election 128:Administrator elections are conducted by 119:Oct 25 – Oct 31 - SecurePoll voting phase 298: 479: 438:– consensus for a trial admin election 295:Comparison with requests for adminship 281: 89:are a proposed process for selecting 7: 276:No. The result of the corresponding 154:having an extended confirmed account 519:subject to a bureaucrat discussion 432:– no consensus for admin elections 256:for the October 2024 election are 222:Period 2: Discussion and questions 116:Oct 22 – Oct 24 - Discussion phase 113:Oct 8 – Oct 14 - Candidate sign-up 14: 383: 409:add yourself to the mailing list 176:Administrator elections use the 142:number of requests for adminship 19: 538:Knowledge (XXG) draft proposals 278:request for comment discussion 178:Arbitration Committee Election 38:, and has not yet reached the 1: 213:Period 1: Candidates sign up 554: 378:Extended confirmed account 343:Secret (using SecurePoll) 97:. It is an alternative to 49: 373: 362: 347: 336: 328: 320: 317: 312: 309: 301: 313:Administrator elections 310:Requests for adminship 87:Administrator elections 445:October 2024 election 99:requests for adminship 83: 321:7 days (overlapping) 82: 426:– detailed proposal 420:Proposals and RFCs 148:Eligible candidates 363:Success threshold 348:Success criterion 318:Discussion period 166:RfA candidate poll 164:RfAs, or start an 84: 29:policy, guideline, 400: 399: 77: 76: 545: 522: 514: 508: 501: 495: 484: 299: 231:Period 3: Voting 69: 62: 23: 22: 16: 553: 552: 548: 547: 546: 544: 543: 542: 528: 527: 526: 525: 515: 511: 502: 498: 485: 481: 476: 417: 405: 307: 304: 297: 274: 245: 233: 224: 215: 206: 196:not be vanished 174: 150: 126: 110: 73: 72: 65: 58: 54: 20: 12: 11: 5: 551: 549: 541: 540: 530: 529: 524: 523: 509: 496: 478: 477: 475: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 463: 458: 452: 442: 441: 440: 439: 433: 427: 416: 413: 404: 401: 398: 397: 394: 391: 387: 386: 384:§ Who can vote 380: 375: 371: 370: 367: 364: 360: 359: 354: 349: 345: 344: 341: 338: 334: 333: 330: 329:Voting period 326: 325: 322: 319: 315: 314: 311: 308: 305: 302: 296: 293: 273: 270: 244: 241: 232: 229: 223: 220: 214: 211: 205: 202: 201: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 173: 170: 149: 146: 125: 122: 121: 120: 117: 114: 109: 106: 91:administrators 75: 74: 71: 70: 63: 55: 50: 47: 33: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 550: 539: 536: 535: 533: 520: 513: 510: 506: 500: 497: 493: 489: 483: 480: 473: 467: 464: 462: 459: 456: 453: 450: 447: 446: 444: 443: 437: 434: 431: 428: 425: 422: 421: 419: 418: 414: 412: 410: 402: 396:October 2024 395: 392: 389: 388: 385: 381: 379: 376: 372: 368: 365: 361: 358: 357:Supermajority 355: 353: 350: 346: 342: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 316: 300: 294: 292: 290: 285: 284: 279: 271: 269: 267: 263: 259: 254: 253:sockpuppeteer 250: 242: 240: 238: 230: 228: 221: 219: 212: 210: 203: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 182: 181: 179: 171: 169: 167: 163: 159: 155: 147: 145: 143: 138: 135: 131: 130:secret ballot 123: 118: 115: 112: 111: 107: 105: 102: 100: 96: 92: 88: 81: 68: 64: 61: 57: 56: 53: 48: 45: 42:of gathering 41: 37: 32: 30: 25: 18: 17: 512: 499: 488:mailing list 482: 449:phab:T371454 406: 286: 275: 248: 246: 234: 225: 216: 207: 199:not be a bot 175: 172:Who can vote 162:unsuccessful 151: 139: 127: 103: 86: 85: 26: 492:Jimmy Wales 258:Johannnes89 95:maintenance 31:or process. 474:References 403:Newsletter 237:SecurePoll 158:successful 134:SecurePoll 132:using the 36:discussion 393:Any time 374:Suffrage 352:Consensus 289:talk page 204:Procedure 160:and some 124:Rationale 67:WP:AELECT 52:Shortcuts 44:consensus 532:Category 415:See also 306:Features 283:written. 243:Tallying 108:Schedule 366:65–75% 337:Ballot 332:7 days 324:3 days 303:Process 40:process 264:, and 60:WP:ADE 390:When 340:Open 266:Yahya 382:See 369:70% 262:EPIC 140:The 280:is 249:not 534:: 411:. 268:. 260:, 168:. 507:. 494:.

Index

policy, guideline,
discussion
process
consensus
Shortcuts
WP:ADE
WP:AELECT

administrators
maintenance
requests for adminship
secret ballot
SecurePoll
number of requests for adminship
having an extended confirmed account
successful
unsuccessful
RfA candidate poll
Arbitration Committee Election
SecurePoll
sockpuppeteer
Johannnes89
EPIC
Yahya
request for comment discussion
talk page
Consensus
Supermajority
Extended confirmed account
§ Who can vote

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.