335:: Modifier sometimes used with a vote (usually keep or delete). Generally the strong modifier is used when someone feels that fundamental Knowledge policy clearly supports inclusion or deletion of the article. A strong vote is not an attack on the authors or other voters, merely a statement that the voter stands firmly behind the vote. Generally the weak modifier means that the voter is only somewhat sure that their suggested action should be taken, or could be convinced otherwise.
35:
285:
Multiple users place adjectives in their recommendations, so no one can speak for all of them, as there are probably many reasons why users choose to carry out this practice. Editors may choose to carry out practices at AfD simply because they see another user doing it, and think it makes sense for
277:
also contains no recommendation for editors to put their recommended cause of action at the start of a comment, but it is common practice there as well. There is no formal separation between a "recommendation area" and an "opinion area" in policy, so it makes no difference if users put adjectives
182:
There is no policy or phrase in a policy that encourages or even suggests this practice. So why is it done? The most obvious reason is that users feel that their comments will gain a different level of support. By saying "Strong" for instance, maybe they believe that their recommendations will
307:
If the aim of discouraging placing adjectives in recommendations is to avoid offence, then the best course of action is probably to simply ignore them. Excessive challenging of users who place adjectives in their recommendations is likely to cause more problems than it solves, as many users will
198:
It has absolutely, utterly, no effect whatsoever on the recommendation and is just an annoying drain on editors' eyes to have to look at. If you think it'll make your recommendation count for anything different, the point is; it doesn't. No matter what adjective you add, it will not affect your
186:
Another idea is that a lot of users put the terms in their recommendation simply to express the opinion. Again, not the place for it. Saying "Strong" or "Weak" in your actual recommendation is not good because it makes it appear like your recommendation is different; it's not. Your opinion is
294:
It has been suggested that placing adjectives in recommendations may be offensive. Only in some cases is this possible, for instance stating that you strongly support a candidate at RfA, or admitting your position is weak at AfD, is clearly not likely to cause offence. Even in other cases, it
299:
to interpret an adjective in a recommendation to be a statement that it is superior or "counts more" than another. Drawing such negative conclusions on the meaning of other user's comments where it is not necessary is not a healthy practice on
Knowledge. It is more productive if editors
2750:
790:
199:
recommendation. Two "Strong
Supports" counts the same as two "Supports". If you want to make an opinion, your opinion is different from your recommendation. And, because it's your opinion, it goes in the opinion area of your comment, not in the recommendation area.
1951:
363:
The overall impact of putting adjectives in your recommendations is trivial, but an action is not necessarily a statement that the editor carrying it out believes it will make a huge difference. For instance, does it make a difference if users put a
1355:
166:
It doesn't matter whatever else you want to add, be it strong, weak, very strong, extremely strong, or absolutely and completely, totally and utterly devastating: your vote will still only count as one vote. So stop it. Thank you.
820:
2086:
2637:
2517:
1689:
142:
2046:
1855:
1450:
2890:
2198:
835:
2900:
3166:
3161:
2452:
1157:
286:
them to do it also. Another reason could be the need of an editor to summarise their underlying feelings on an issue at the time, particularly for future reference when they look back at the discussion.
2830:
2577:
2642:
502:
2955:
237:. These exist because there is clear evidence of harm from these practices; no such evidence exists for users placing adjectives in their recommendations however. This is essentially a harmless and
1255:
2940:
2690:
1230:
1285:
982:
3253:
2960:
2367:
1553:
1007:
930:
512:
2407:
2387:
1350:
1320:
632:
1644:
1370:
1132:
647:
587:
562:
552:
720:
3105:
1052:
2412:
2492:
2447:
2357:
2307:
1573:
1300:
1275:
3000:
1290:
925:
910:
411:
2327:
890:
3214:
2482:
2397:
1513:
1365:
1270:
885:
845:
700:
3110:
2203:
2116:
1714:
1455:
1280:
1205:
940:
915:
840:
622:
452:
2091:
2036:
2021:
2537:
2487:
2342:
1634:
972:
855:
735:
3070:
1699:
1445:
1182:
1107:
677:
1754:
273:), however it does not say to put those at the beginning of a comment, as is common practice, or that adjectives cannot be appended to such recommendations. The
2965:
2617:
2462:
2382:
2051:
1800:
1729:
1583:
880:
3010:
2567:
1774:
1152:
1142:
1032:
935:
920:
157:
Looks stupid, don't it? It also does every time you add a fucking stupid and worthless adjective to your votes. There are four words that should be in bold:
2552:
2522:
2332:
2081:
2076:
1613:
1062:
1017:
947:
2865:
1310:
685:
399:
2820:
2695:
715:
2582:
2297:
1694:
1380:
1162:
1147:
992:
905:
522:
507:
3171:
3090:
2472:
2432:
2146:
1769:
1759:
1679:
1195:
1097:
1027:
815:
1815:
2950:
2312:
1749:
1495:
987:
667:
527:
2111:
2056:
2026:
497:
2780:
2700:
1563:
1440:
657:
108:
or !votes); there is disagreement on if this is a good practice or not. Examples of placing an adjective in a recommendations could be placing
3095:
3065:
3060:
2855:
2835:
2632:
2392:
2061:
2016:
2011:
1820:
1704:
1608:
1345:
1057:
1002:
957:
895:
865:
770:
760:
532:
2377:
977:
3030:
2905:
2755:
2477:
2173:
1981:
1860:
1709:
1305:
1127:
1077:
617:
317:
3045:
2985:
2910:
2402:
2372:
2292:
2121:
1092:
1082:
1047:
860:
765:
487:
3055:
2920:
2895:
2875:
2775:
2547:
2006:
1915:
1875:
1779:
1435:
1420:
1295:
900:
750:
705:
662:
637:
597:
447:
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
3197:
3025:
3005:
2930:
2925:
2497:
1986:
1629:
1538:
1400:
1335:
1245:
1235:
1210:
1172:
1167:
1102:
870:
830:
775:
246:
51:
1483:
2101:
1593:
3219:
3085:
2622:
1910:
1895:
1810:
1385:
730:
477:
472:
274:
113:
3015:
2825:
2795:
2760:
2587:
2066:
1976:
1890:
1533:
1503:
1375:
557:
372:– ...)? Probably not, but many users do it anyway. The same principle applies with putting adjectives in your recommendations.
262:
121:
3181:
3050:
2880:
2607:
2507:
2317:
2193:
2106:
2071:
1996:
1966:
1830:
1664:
1654:
1603:
1430:
1415:
1340:
1112:
962:
805:
592:
537:
462:
392:
265:
is not policy but reviews convention, and includes the recommendation that editors put their recommended course of action in
1764:
2096:
1991:
1956:
785:
3156:
2970:
2885:
2647:
2592:
2512:
2467:
2422:
2417:
2302:
2136:
1931:
1639:
1460:
1240:
1215:
1122:
1117:
997:
710:
627:
542:
457:
337:
234:
170:
2031:
328:
207:
If you haven't gotten the point by now, my point is; stop putting adjectives in your recommendations. If you do so, you:
153:
3207:
2980:
2860:
2740:
2715:
2542:
2178:
2141:
2131:
1734:
1674:
1528:
825:
800:
755:
652:
607:
582:
572:
547:
187:
different. And, because it's your opinion, it goes in the opinion area of your comment, not in the recommendation area.
3100:
2915:
2800:
2725:
2612:
2532:
2502:
2352:
1971:
1941:
1905:
1795:
1659:
1578:
1360:
1225:
1190:
1037:
795:
745:
740:
467:
301:
1523:
3202:
3151:
2790:
2785:
2745:
2730:
2720:
2597:
2442:
2347:
1850:
1840:
1739:
1548:
1410:
695:
567:
183:
contribute more to the consensus; by saying "Weak" maybe they feel that their recommendations will count for less.
3248:
3176:
3133:
2945:
2810:
2710:
2670:
2627:
2572:
2562:
2557:
2527:
2362:
2337:
2322:
2277:
2163:
1885:
1825:
1558:
1395:
1330:
1325:
1315:
1067:
690:
442:
424:
385:
258:
2850:
2805:
2168:
2041:
2001:
1805:
1543:
1072:
517:
217:
Give others the impression that you think you have some kind of special power different from them. You don't.
3080:
3020:
2995:
2935:
2845:
2840:
2427:
2244:
1946:
1936:
1724:
1719:
1137:
810:
780:
612:
282:), or as part of their rationale (e.g. I strongly believe that this article should be deleted because...).
3040:
2990:
2770:
2765:
2735:
2224:
2188:
2183:
1880:
1684:
1518:
1042:
875:
850:
725:
304:
that comments placed in discussions are not intended to be offensive, and should not be treated as such.
3035:
2602:
2457:
1870:
1865:
1649:
1568:
1425:
1087:
492:
316:
Adjectives have been placed in recommendations since the early days of
Knowledge. The historical page
2975:
2437:
2234:
2158:
1022:
967:
952:
482:
257:
A lot of the practice that occurs in discussions is through convention rather than policy, with the
3075:
2685:
2254:
2229:
2208:
1588:
1220:
1012:
577:
55:
17:
2249:
2239:
2153:
2126:
1390:
642:
230:
65:
2705:
1669:
1508:
1405:
602:
1961:
1845:
1835:
1744:
408:
43:
1598:
2870:
2815:
1900:
1200:
3242:
2751:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
242:
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
229:
Knowledge has policies against users carrying out certain practices such as being
345:
225:
Arguments on why it doesn't matter if you put adjectives in your recommendations
138:
261:
for instance not going into detail on how to comment in deletion discussions.
296:
101:
1952:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
238:
241:
practice, and even if it deviates from standard practice in discussions,
377:
308:
undoubtedly take offence for being criticised on such a trivial issue.
143:
User:Dev920/Absolutely and completely, totally and utterly devastating
1356:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
224:
821:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
365:
105:
3131:
2668:
2275:
1481:
422:
381:
2638:
Knowledge is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
325:
150:
29:
2518:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
1690:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
368:
between their recommended cause of action and opinion (e.g.
128:
Arguments against putting adjectives in your recommendations
2047:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
1856:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
1451:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
791:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
2891:
How many
Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
2901:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
349:
87:
80:
73:
2453:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2087:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
1158:
Knowledge is not being written in an organized fashion
2199:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
836:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
263:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion#How to discuss an AfD
503:
Editing
Knowledge is like visiting a foreign country
3190:
3144:
2217:
1924:
1788:
1622:
1494:
1254:
1181:
676:
435:
3162:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
2941:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
249:on what users can and can't do should be avoided.
425:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
278:next to their recommended course of action (e.g.
214:Make yourself seem foolish and unaware of policy.
104:in their recommendations (sometimes described as
3254:Knowledge essays about building the encyclopedia
1286:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
1231:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
983:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
2961:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
2691:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
2368:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1008:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
513:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
2643:Knowledge is not the place to post your résumé
2388:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
1554:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
1321:Counting and sorting are not original research
1351:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
633:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
393:
196:Don't put adjectives in your recommendations.
137:The inspiration for this position comes from
8:
2881:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
1645:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
1371:How to save an article proposed for deletion
648:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
588:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
563:Not editing because of Knowledge restriction
2413:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
1133:Understanding Knowledge's content standards
3141:
3128:
3106:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
2678:
2665:
2493:Notability is not relevance or reliability
2448:News coverage does not decrease notability
2358:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
2308:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
2285:
2272:
1491:
1478:
1301:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
1276:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
432:
419:
400:
386:
378:
253:Alternative viewpoint on why users do this
3001:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
1291:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
911:Identifying and using independent sources
3167:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
2328:Big events make key participants notable
891:Formatting bilateral relations templates
3215:How to contribute to Knowledge guidance
2831:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge" as "Wiki"!
2578:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
2483:Notability is not a level playing field
2398:How the presumption of notability works
1514:Contributing to complicated discussions
1366:How the presumption of notability works
886:Formatting bilateral relations articles
701:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
320:once recorded what they were used for:
3111:You should not write meaningless lists
2408:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
1715:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
1456:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
1281:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
846:Don't hope the house will build itself
623:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge
453:All Five Pillars are equally important
2538:One sentence does not an article make
2488:Notability is not a matter of opinion
2204:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2117:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
1635:A weak personal attack is still wrong
1574:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
1206:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
973:Minors and persons judged incompetent
736:An unfinished house is a real problem
721:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
7:
3071:Things that should not be surprising
2766:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2092:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2037:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2022:Don't call people by their real name
1700:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1108:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
350:Knowledge:Votes for deletion phrases
318:Knowledge:Votes for deletion phrases
2966:No one cares about your garage band
2618:What is and is not routine coverage
2463:No one cares about your garage band
2383:Existence does not prove notability
1801:Assume the assumption of good faith
1730:There is no Divine Right of Editors
1584:Relationships with academic editors
1446:Why was the page I created deleted?
881:Featured articles may have problems
3011:Please do not murder the newcomers
2568:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2052:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
1775:Knowledge should not be a monopoly
1266:Adjectives in your recommendations
1153:Knowledge is not a reliable source
1143:What an article should not include
1033:The problem with elegant variation
841:Don't get hung up on minor details
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
52:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
18:Knowledge:Adjectives in your votes
2333:Businesses with a single location
1614:You have a right to remain silent
1063:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1018:Potential, not just current state
948:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
2082:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2077:Don't ignore community consensus
1311:Confusing arguments mean nothing
375:And that, as they say, is that.
221:And that, as they say, is that.
33:
2583:Sources must be out-of-universe
2298:All high schools can be notable
1695:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
1381:Identifying blatant advertising
1163:The world will not end tomorrow
1148:Knowledge is a work in progress
993:Not everything needs a template
906:How to write a featured article
523:External criticism of Knowledge
508:Editors will sometimes be wrong
3172:Avoid writing redundant essays
3091:What Knowledge is not/Outtakes
2821:Don't stuff beans up your nose
2696:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
2523:Obscurity ≠Lack of notability
2473:Notability cannot be purchased
2433:Masking the lack of notability
1770:Knowledge is not about winning
1196:Copyediting reception sections
1098:Temporary versions of articles
1028:Principle of Some Astonishment
816:Creating controversial content
716:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
243:Knowledge is not a bureaucracy
1:
3198:About policies and guidelines
2951:List of jokes about Knowledge
2313:Articles with a single source
1760:Two wrongs don't make a right
1750:The rules of polite discourse
1680:It's not the end of the world
1441:Knowledge is not Whack-A-Mole
988:Not everything needs a navbox
856:Don't "teach the controversy"
668:Knowledge is not RationalWiki
528:Here to build an encyclopedia
2781:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
2701:Alternatives to edit warring
1564:Maintaining a friendly space
658:Knowledge is an encyclopedia
3066:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3061:The first rule of Knowledge
2856:Editing under the influence
2633:Knowledge is not Crunchbase
2393:Google searches and numbers
2112:Don't template the regulars
2027:Don't call the kettle black
1821:Be excellent to one another
1705:Revert notification opt-out
1609:We are all Wikipedians here
1058:Put a little effort into it
1003:Obtain peer review comments
958:Introduction to structurism
896:Fruit of the poisonous tree
866:Editors are not mindreaders
771:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
761:Beef up that first revision
533:Leave it to the experienced
498:Don't search for objections
161:Keep Delete Neutral Comment
100:Some editors choose to put
3270:
3096:Why not create an account?
3031:Requirements for adminship
2906:How to vandalize correctly
2836:Don't delete the main page
2756:Avoid using preview button
2478:Notability comparison test
2062:Don't fight fire with fire
2057:Don't eat the troll's food
2017:Don't call a spade a spade
2012:Don't bludgeon the process
1861:Encourage full discussions
1710:Shadowless Fists of Death!
1346:Don't attack the nominator
1306:But there must be sources!
1128:Try not to leave it a stub
1078:Source your plot summaries
290:Potential to cause offence
63:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge
3140:
3127:
3046:Sarcasm is really helpful
2986:Notability is not eternal
2911:How to win a citation war
2681:
2677:
2664:
2373:Every snowflake is unique
2293:Advanced source searching
2288:
2284:
2271:
2174:No, you can't have a pony
2122:Do not insult the vandals
1982:Don't be high-maintenance
1539:Encouraging the newcomers
1490:
1477:
1083:Specialized-style fallacy
1048:Pruning article revisions
876:Endorsements (commercial)
861:Editing on mobile devices
766:Blind men and an elephant
741:Articles have a half-life
488:Dissent is not disloyalty
458:Avoid vague introductions
431:
418:
342:
3056:The Night Before Wikimas
2921:Ignore every single rule
2896:How to get away with UPE
2776:Before they were notable
2548:Overreliance upon Google
2343:Common sourcing mistakes
1916:Settle the process first
1876:Imagine others complexly
1780:Writing for the opponent
1755:There is no common sense
1436:Unopposed AFD discussion
1421:Relisting can be abusive
1296:Avoid repeated arguments
901:Give an article a chance
751:Avoid mission statements
711:Advanced text formatting
706:Advanced article editing
663:Knowledge is a community
638:The rules are principles
598:Product, process, policy
448:Articles must be written
211:Exasperate other users.
3191:Policies and guidelines
3026:Requests for medication
3006:Please bite the newbies
2931:Mess with the templates
2498:Notability means impact
2032:Don't call things cruft
2007:Don't be the Fun Police
1937:Knowledge:Because I can
1816:Avoid the word "vandal"
1630:A thank you never hurts
1401:Liar liar pants on fire
1336:Deletion is not cleanup
1246:Writing better articles
1236:Write the article first
1211:Gender-neutral language
1183:Writing article content
1173:Writing better articles
1168:Write the article first
1103:Tertiary-source fallacy
871:Encourage the newcomers
831:Dictionaries as sources
776:Build content to endure
235:making personal attacks
3220:Policy writing is hard
3086:Knowledge is an MMORPG
2926:Is that even an essay?
2623:What notability is not
2378:Existence ≠Notability
1987:Don't be inconsiderate
1911:Read before commenting
1896:Mind your own business
1811:Avoid personal remarks
1386:Identifying test edits
731:A navbox on every page
686:100K featured articles
483:Concede lost arguments
478:Competence is required
247:excessive restrictions
191:So what is being said?
141:, who, on the subpage
3016:Pledge of Tranquility
2761:Avoid using wikilinks
2588:Subjective importance
2102:Don't spite your face
1891:Keep it down to earth
1655:Beware of the tigers!
1594:Too long; didn't read
1534:Edit at your own pace
1504:Accepting other users
1271:AfD is not a war zone
618:There is no seniority
558:Neutrality of sources
295:requires significant
178:Why do users do this?
122:articles for deletion
114:request for adminship
54:, as it has not been
3182:Quote your own essay
3051:Sausages for tasting
2876:Five Fs of Knowledge
2826:Don't-give-a-fuckism
2796:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
2608:Vanispamcruftisement
2508:Notability sub-pages
2318:Avoid template creep
2278:Essays on notability
2194:There are no oracles
1977:Don't be a WikiBigot
1831:Call a spade a spade
1604:Unblock perspectives
1431:The Heymann Standard
1416:Overzealous deletion
1376:I just don't like it
1113:There is no deadline
978:"Murder of" articles
806:Common-style fallacy
678:Article construction
593:Process is important
538:Levels of competence
463:Be a reliable source
2971:No one really cares
2886:Go ahead, vandalize
2648:Two prongs of merit
2593:Third-party sources
2513:Notabilitymandering
2468:No one really cares
2423:Inherent notability
2418:Independent sources
2303:Alternative outlets
2137:Nationalist editing
2107:Don't take the bait
2072:Don't help too much
1997:Don't be prejudiced
1967:Don't be an ostrich
1932:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
1665:Deletion as revenge
1640:Advice for hotheads
1461:No Encyclopedic Use
1341:Does deletion help?
1241:Writing about women
1123:The deadline is now
1118:There is a deadline
998:Nothing is in stone
628:Tendentious editing
543:Levels of consensus
275:advice given at RfA
2981:No sorcery threats
2861:Embrace Stop Signs
2741:Assume good wraith
2716:Anti-Wikipedianism
2553:Perennial websites
2543:Other stuff exists
2179:Passive aggression
2142:No angry mastodons
2132:Hate is disruptive
1992:Don't be obnoxious
1957:Don't be a fanatic
1735:Most ideas are bad
1675:Forgive and forget
1484:Essays on civility
1093:Run an edit-a-thon
826:Deprecated sources
801:Citation underkill
786:Chesterton's fence
756:Be neutral in form
653:Knowledge in brief
608:Reasonability rule
573:Oversimplification
548:Most ideas are bad
3236:
3235:
3232:
3231:
3228:
3227:
3123:
3122:
3119:
3118:
3101:Yes legal threats
2916:Ignore all essays
2801:Complete bollocks
2726:Asshole John rule
2660:
2659:
2656:
2655:
2613:What BLP1E is not
2533:One hundred words
2503:Notability points
2267:
2266:
2263:
2262:
2067:Don't give a fuck
1942:Civil POV pushing
1906:Mutual withdrawal
1796:Assume good faith
1765:Knowledge clichés
1660:Civility warnings
1579:Please say please
1529:Editors' pronouns
1473:
1472:
1469:
1468:
1361:Follow the leader
1226:Use our own words
1191:Avoid thread mode
1038:Pro and con lists
796:Citation overkill
746:Autosizing images
468:Civil POV pushing
356:
355:
333:Strong.../Weak...
175:
174:
98:
97:
16:(Redirected from
3261:
3249:Knowledge essays
3177:Finding an essay
3142:
3129:
2791:Butterfly effect
2786:Boston Tea Party
2746:Assume stupidity
2731:Assume bad faith
2721:Articlecountitis
2679:
2666:
2598:Trivial mentions
2443:Minimum coverage
2286:
2273:
1972:Don't be ashamed
1851:Discussing cruft
1841:Deny recognition
1740:Nothing is clear
1549:Expect no thanks
1492:
1479:
1411:Nothing is clear
1258:deleting content
941:Tertiary sources
696:Acronym overkill
568:The one question
433:
420:
413:
409:Knowledge essays
402:
395:
388:
379:
352:
326:
151:
90:
83:
76:
37:
36:
30:
21:
3269:
3268:
3264:
3263:
3262:
3260:
3259:
3258:
3239:
3238:
3237:
3224:
3186:
3157:Value of essays
3136:
3115:
2946:Legal vandalism
2811:Counting juntas
2711:Anti-Wikipedian
2673:
2671:Humorous essays
2652:
2628:What to include
2573:Run-of-the-mill
2563:Read the source
2528:Offline sources
2323:Bare notability
2280:
2259:
2213:
2164:No Confederates
1962:Don't be a jerk
1920:
1886:Keep it concise
1826:Beyond civility
1784:
1618:
1559:How to be civil
1524:Don't retaliate
1486:
1465:
1396:Keep it concise
1331:Delete the junk
1326:Delete or merge
1316:Content removal
1250:
1216:Myth vs fiction
1177:
1068:Robotic editing
931:Science sources
926:Primary sources
916:History sources
691:Abandoned stubs
672:
443:Article content
427:
414:
406:
361:
343:
314:
292:
259:deletion policy
255:
227:
205:
193:
180:
135:
130:
94:
93:
86:
79:
72:
68:
60:
59:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
3267:
3265:
3257:
3256:
3251:
3241:
3240:
3234:
3233:
3230:
3229:
3226:
3225:
3223:
3222:
3217:
3212:
3211:
3210:
3205:
3194:
3192:
3188:
3187:
3185:
3184:
3179:
3174:
3169:
3164:
3159:
3154:
3148:
3146:
3138:
3137:
3132:
3125:
3124:
3121:
3120:
3117:
3116:
3114:
3113:
3108:
3103:
3098:
3093:
3088:
3083:
3078:
3073:
3068:
3063:
3058:
3053:
3048:
3043:
3038:
3033:
3028:
3023:
3018:
3013:
3008:
3003:
2998:
2993:
2988:
2983:
2978:
2973:
2968:
2963:
2958:
2953:
2948:
2943:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2923:
2918:
2913:
2908:
2903:
2898:
2893:
2888:
2883:
2878:
2873:
2868:
2863:
2858:
2853:
2851:Editsummarisis
2848:
2843:
2838:
2833:
2828:
2823:
2818:
2813:
2808:
2806:Counting forks
2803:
2798:
2793:
2788:
2783:
2778:
2773:
2768:
2763:
2758:
2753:
2748:
2743:
2738:
2733:
2728:
2723:
2718:
2713:
2708:
2703:
2698:
2693:
2688:
2682:
2675:
2674:
2669:
2662:
2661:
2658:
2657:
2654:
2653:
2651:
2650:
2645:
2640:
2635:
2630:
2625:
2620:
2615:
2610:
2605:
2600:
2595:
2590:
2585:
2580:
2575:
2570:
2565:
2560:
2555:
2550:
2545:
2540:
2535:
2530:
2525:
2520:
2515:
2510:
2505:
2500:
2495:
2490:
2485:
2480:
2475:
2470:
2465:
2460:
2455:
2450:
2445:
2440:
2435:
2430:
2425:
2420:
2415:
2410:
2405:
2400:
2395:
2390:
2385:
2380:
2375:
2370:
2365:
2363:Don't cite GNG
2360:
2355:
2350:
2345:
2340:
2338:But it's true!
2335:
2330:
2325:
2320:
2315:
2310:
2305:
2300:
2295:
2289:
2282:
2281:
2276:
2269:
2268:
2265:
2264:
2261:
2260:
2258:
2257:
2252:
2247:
2242:
2237:
2235:WikiHarassment
2232:
2227:
2221:
2219:
2215:
2214:
2212:
2211:
2206:
2201:
2196:
2191:
2186:
2181:
2176:
2171:
2169:No queerphobia
2166:
2161:
2156:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2139:
2134:
2129:
2124:
2119:
2114:
2109:
2104:
2099:
2094:
2089:
2084:
2079:
2074:
2069:
2064:
2059:
2054:
2049:
2044:
2039:
2034:
2029:
2024:
2019:
2014:
2009:
2004:
1999:
1994:
1989:
1984:
1979:
1974:
1969:
1964:
1959:
1954:
1949:
1944:
1939:
1934:
1928:
1926:
1922:
1921:
1919:
1918:
1913:
1908:
1903:
1898:
1893:
1888:
1883:
1878:
1873:
1868:
1863:
1858:
1853:
1848:
1843:
1838:
1833:
1828:
1823:
1818:
1813:
1808:
1806:Assume no clue
1803:
1798:
1792:
1790:
1786:
1785:
1783:
1782:
1777:
1772:
1767:
1762:
1757:
1752:
1747:
1742:
1737:
1732:
1727:
1722:
1717:
1712:
1707:
1702:
1697:
1692:
1687:
1682:
1677:
1672:
1667:
1662:
1657:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1637:
1632:
1626:
1624:
1620:
1619:
1617:
1616:
1611:
1606:
1601:
1596:
1591:
1586:
1581:
1576:
1571:
1566:
1561:
1556:
1551:
1546:
1544:Enjoy yourself
1541:
1536:
1531:
1526:
1521:
1516:
1511:
1506:
1500:
1498:
1488:
1487:
1482:
1475:
1474:
1471:
1470:
1467:
1466:
1464:
1463:
1458:
1453:
1448:
1443:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1423:
1418:
1413:
1408:
1403:
1398:
1393:
1388:
1383:
1378:
1373:
1368:
1363:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1343:
1338:
1333:
1328:
1323:
1318:
1313:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1293:
1288:
1283:
1278:
1273:
1268:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1252:
1251:
1249:
1248:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1228:
1223:
1218:
1213:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1193:
1187:
1185:
1179:
1178:
1176:
1175:
1170:
1165:
1160:
1155:
1150:
1145:
1140:
1135:
1130:
1125:
1120:
1115:
1110:
1105:
1100:
1095:
1090:
1085:
1080:
1075:
1073:Sham consensus
1070:
1065:
1060:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1025:
1020:
1015:
1010:
1005:
1000:
995:
990:
985:
980:
975:
970:
965:
960:
955:
950:
945:
944:
943:
938:
933:
928:
923:
918:
908:
903:
898:
893:
888:
883:
878:
873:
868:
863:
858:
853:
848:
843:
838:
833:
828:
823:
818:
813:
808:
803:
798:
793:
788:
783:
778:
773:
768:
763:
758:
753:
748:
743:
738:
733:
728:
723:
718:
713:
708:
703:
698:
693:
688:
682:
680:
674:
673:
671:
670:
665:
660:
655:
650:
645:
640:
635:
630:
625:
620:
615:
610:
605:
600:
595:
590:
585:
580:
575:
570:
565:
560:
555:
550:
545:
540:
535:
530:
525:
520:
518:Explanationism
515:
510:
505:
500:
495:
490:
485:
480:
475:
470:
465:
460:
455:
450:
445:
439:
437:
429:
428:
423:
416:
415:
407:
405:
404:
397:
390:
382:
360:
357:
354:
353:
340:
339:
336:
330:
323:
313:
310:
291:
288:
254:
251:
226:
223:
219:
218:
215:
212:
204:
201:
192:
189:
179:
176:
173:
172:
169:
164:
163:
155:
148:
134:
131:
129:
126:
124:(AfD) debate.
110:Strong support
96:
95:
92:
91:
84:
77:
69:
64:
61:
49:
48:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3266:
3255:
3252:
3250:
3247:
3246:
3244:
3221:
3218:
3216:
3213:
3209:
3206:
3204:
3201:
3200:
3199:
3196:
3195:
3193:
3189:
3183:
3180:
3178:
3175:
3173:
3170:
3168:
3165:
3163:
3160:
3158:
3155:
3153:
3150:
3149:
3147:
3143:
3139:
3135:
3130:
3126:
3112:
3109:
3107:
3104:
3102:
3099:
3097:
3094:
3092:
3089:
3087:
3084:
3082:
3081:Watchlistitis
3079:
3077:
3076:The WikiBible
3074:
3072:
3069:
3067:
3064:
3062:
3059:
3057:
3054:
3052:
3049:
3047:
3044:
3042:
3039:
3037:
3034:
3032:
3029:
3027:
3024:
3022:
3021:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3019:
3017:
3014:
3012:
3009:
3007:
3004:
3002:
2999:
2997:
2996:Play the game
2994:
2992:
2989:
2987:
2984:
2982:
2979:
2977:
2974:
2972:
2969:
2967:
2964:
2962:
2959:
2957:
2954:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2944:
2942:
2939:
2937:
2936:My local pond
2934:
2932:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2922:
2919:
2917:
2914:
2912:
2909:
2907:
2904:
2902:
2899:
2897:
2894:
2892:
2889:
2887:
2884:
2882:
2879:
2877:
2874:
2872:
2869:
2867:
2864:
2862:
2859:
2857:
2854:
2852:
2849:
2847:
2846:Edits Per Day
2844:
2842:
2841:Editcountitis
2839:
2837:
2834:
2832:
2829:
2827:
2824:
2822:
2819:
2817:
2814:
2812:
2809:
2807:
2804:
2802:
2799:
2797:
2794:
2792:
2789:
2787:
2784:
2782:
2779:
2777:
2774:
2772:
2769:
2767:
2764:
2762:
2759:
2757:
2754:
2752:
2749:
2747:
2744:
2742:
2739:
2737:
2734:
2732:
2729:
2727:
2724:
2722:
2719:
2717:
2714:
2712:
2709:
2707:
2704:
2702:
2699:
2697:
2694:
2692:
2689:
2687:
2684:
2683:
2680:
2676:
2672:
2667:
2663:
2649:
2646:
2644:
2641:
2639:
2636:
2634:
2631:
2629:
2626:
2624:
2621:
2619:
2616:
2614:
2611:
2609:
2606:
2604:
2601:
2599:
2596:
2594:
2591:
2589:
2586:
2584:
2581:
2579:
2576:
2574:
2571:
2569:
2566:
2564:
2561:
2559:
2556:
2554:
2551:
2549:
2546:
2544:
2541:
2539:
2536:
2534:
2531:
2529:
2526:
2524:
2521:
2519:
2516:
2514:
2511:
2509:
2506:
2504:
2501:
2499:
2496:
2494:
2491:
2489:
2486:
2484:
2481:
2479:
2476:
2474:
2471:
2469:
2466:
2464:
2461:
2459:
2456:
2454:
2451:
2449:
2446:
2444:
2441:
2439:
2436:
2434:
2431:
2429:
2428:Insignificant
2426:
2424:
2421:
2419:
2416:
2414:
2411:
2409:
2406:
2404:
2401:
2399:
2396:
2394:
2391:
2389:
2386:
2384:
2381:
2379:
2376:
2374:
2371:
2369:
2366:
2364:
2361:
2359:
2356:
2354:
2351:
2349:
2346:
2344:
2341:
2339:
2336:
2334:
2331:
2329:
2326:
2324:
2321:
2319:
2316:
2314:
2311:
2309:
2306:
2304:
2301:
2299:
2296:
2294:
2291:
2290:
2287:
2283:
2279:
2274:
2270:
2256:
2253:
2251:
2248:
2246:
2245:WikiLawyering
2243:
2241:
2238:
2236:
2233:
2231:
2228:
2226:
2223:
2222:
2220:
2218:WikiRelations
2216:
2210:
2207:
2205:
2202:
2200:
2197:
2195:
2192:
2190:
2187:
2185:
2182:
2180:
2177:
2175:
2172:
2170:
2167:
2165:
2162:
2160:
2157:
2155:
2152:
2148:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2140:
2138:
2135:
2133:
2130:
2128:
2125:
2123:
2120:
2118:
2115:
2113:
2110:
2108:
2105:
2103:
2100:
2098:
2095:
2093:
2090:
2088:
2085:
2083:
2080:
2078:
2075:
2073:
2070:
2068:
2065:
2063:
2060:
2058:
2055:
2053:
2050:
2048:
2045:
2043:
2042:Don't cry COI
2040:
2038:
2035:
2033:
2030:
2028:
2025:
2023:
2020:
2018:
2015:
2013:
2010:
2008:
2005:
2003:
2002:Don't be rude
2000:
1998:
1995:
1993:
1990:
1988:
1985:
1983:
1980:
1978:
1975:
1973:
1970:
1968:
1965:
1963:
1960:
1958:
1955:
1953:
1950:
1948:
1947:Cyberbullying
1945:
1943:
1940:
1938:
1935:
1933:
1930:
1929:
1927:
1923:
1917:
1914:
1912:
1909:
1907:
1904:
1902:
1899:
1897:
1894:
1892:
1889:
1887:
1884:
1882:
1879:
1877:
1874:
1872:
1869:
1867:
1864:
1862:
1859:
1857:
1854:
1852:
1849:
1847:
1844:
1842:
1839:
1837:
1834:
1832:
1829:
1827:
1824:
1822:
1819:
1817:
1814:
1812:
1809:
1807:
1804:
1802:
1799:
1797:
1794:
1793:
1791:
1787:
1781:
1778:
1776:
1773:
1771:
1768:
1766:
1763:
1761:
1758:
1756:
1753:
1751:
1748:
1746:
1743:
1741:
1738:
1736:
1733:
1731:
1728:
1726:
1725:The last word
1723:
1721:
1720:The grey zone
1718:
1716:
1713:
1711:
1708:
1706:
1703:
1701:
1698:
1696:
1693:
1691:
1688:
1686:
1683:
1681:
1678:
1676:
1673:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1628:
1627:
1625:
1621:
1615:
1612:
1610:
1607:
1605:
1602:
1600:
1597:
1595:
1592:
1590:
1587:
1585:
1582:
1580:
1577:
1575:
1572:
1570:
1567:
1565:
1562:
1560:
1557:
1555:
1552:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1542:
1540:
1537:
1535:
1532:
1530:
1527:
1525:
1522:
1520:
1517:
1515:
1512:
1510:
1507:
1505:
1502:
1501:
1499:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1480:
1476:
1462:
1459:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1429:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1404:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1394:
1392:
1389:
1387:
1384:
1382:
1379:
1377:
1374:
1372:
1369:
1367:
1364:
1362:
1359:
1357:
1354:
1352:
1349:
1347:
1344:
1342:
1339:
1337:
1334:
1332:
1329:
1327:
1324:
1322:
1319:
1317:
1314:
1312:
1309:
1307:
1304:
1302:
1299:
1297:
1294:
1292:
1289:
1287:
1284:
1282:
1279:
1277:
1274:
1272:
1269:
1267:
1264:
1263:
1261:
1259:
1253:
1247:
1244:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1222:
1219:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1204:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1189:
1188:
1186:
1184:
1180:
1174:
1171:
1169:
1166:
1164:
1161:
1159:
1156:
1154:
1151:
1149:
1146:
1144:
1141:
1139:
1138:Walled garden
1136:
1134:
1131:
1129:
1126:
1124:
1121:
1119:
1116:
1114:
1111:
1109:
1106:
1104:
1101:
1099:
1096:
1094:
1091:
1089:
1086:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1076:
1074:
1071:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1056:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1026:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1016:
1014:
1011:
1009:
1006:
1004:
1001:
999:
996:
994:
991:
989:
986:
984:
981:
979:
976:
974:
971:
969:
966:
964:
963:Mine a source
961:
959:
956:
954:
951:
949:
946:
942:
939:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
913:
912:
909:
907:
904:
902:
899:
897:
894:
892:
889:
887:
884:
882:
879:
877:
874:
872:
869:
867:
864:
862:
859:
857:
854:
852:
849:
847:
844:
842:
839:
837:
834:
832:
829:
827:
824:
822:
819:
817:
814:
812:
811:Concept cloud
809:
807:
804:
802:
799:
797:
794:
792:
789:
787:
784:
782:
781:Cherrypicking
779:
777:
774:
772:
769:
767:
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
747:
744:
742:
739:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
697:
694:
692:
689:
687:
684:
683:
681:
679:
675:
669:
666:
664:
661:
659:
656:
654:
651:
649:
646:
644:
641:
639:
636:
634:
631:
629:
626:
624:
621:
619:
616:
614:
613:Systemic bias
611:
609:
606:
604:
601:
599:
596:
594:
591:
589:
586:
584:
581:
579:
576:
574:
571:
569:
566:
564:
561:
559:
556:
554:
551:
549:
546:
544:
541:
539:
536:
534:
531:
529:
526:
524:
521:
519:
516:
514:
511:
509:
506:
504:
501:
499:
496:
494:
491:
489:
486:
484:
481:
479:
476:
474:
471:
469:
466:
464:
461:
459:
456:
454:
451:
449:
446:
444:
441:
440:
438:
434:
430:
426:
421:
417:
410:
403:
398:
396:
391:
389:
384:
383:
380:
376:
373:
371:
367:
358:
351:
347:
341:
334:
331:
327:
324:
321:
319:
311:
309:
305:
303:
298:
289:
287:
283:
281:
280:Strong delete
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
252:
250:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
222:
216:
213:
210:
209:
208:
202:
200:
197:
190:
188:
184:
177:
168:
162:
159:
158:
156:
152:
149:
146:
144:
140:
132:
127:
125:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
89:
85:
82:
78:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
57:
53:
47:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
3145:About essays
3134:About essays
3041:Rouge editor
2991:Oops Defense
2771:Barnstaritis
2736:Assume faith
2558:Pokémon test
2403:High Schools
2225:WikiBullying
2189:Superhatting
2184:POV railroad
1881:Just drop it
1685:Nobody cares
1519:Divisiveness
1265:
1043:Printability
936:Style guides
726:Amnesia test
583:Paraphrasing
374:
369:
362:
332:
322:
315:
306:
293:
284:
279:
270:
266:
256:
228:
220:
206:
195:
194:
185:
181:
165:
160:
147:
136:
117:
109:
99:
41:
3152:Essay guide
3036:Rouge admin
2603:Video links
2458:No big loss
2147:just madmen
2097:Don't shout
1871:How to lose
1866:Get over it
1650:Be the glue
1569:Negotiation
1426:Relist bias
1256:Removing or
1088:Stub Makers
921:Law sources
851:Don't panic
133:Inspiration
118:Weak delete
42:This is an
3243:Categories
3208:Guidelines
2976:No, really
2956:LTTAUTMAOK
2438:Make stubs
2159:No racists
1901:Say "MOBY"
1623:Philosophy
1496:The basics
1053:Publicists
1023:Presentism
968:Merge Test
953:Inaccuracy
436:Philosophy
102:adjectives
2686:Adminitis
2255:WikiPeace
2230:WikiCrime
2209:UPPERCASE
1589:Thank you
1221:Proseline
1013:Permastub
578:Paradoxes
493:Don't lie
297:inference
267:bold text
116:(RfA) or
66:Shortcuts
3203:Policies
2353:Coatrack
2250:WikiLove
2240:WikiHate
2154:No Nazis
2127:Griefing
1391:Immunity
643:Trifecta
473:Cohesion
2866:Emerson
2706:ANI flu
1670:Failure
1509:Apology
1406:Nothing
603:Purpose
312:History
239:trivial
231:incivil
203:Summary
88:WP:AIYV
81:WP:AIYR
2348:Clones
1925:Don'ts
1846:Desist
1836:Candor
1745:Reader
370:Delete
359:Impact
346:Siroxo
302:assume
271:Delete
269:(e.g.
145:says:
139:Dev920
120:in an
74:WP:ADJ
1599:Truce
245:, so
112:in a
106:votes
44:essay
2871:Fart
2816:Crap
1201:Coup
553:Need
366:dash
1789:Dos
412:(?)
233:or
3245::
348:,
344:—
338:”
329:“
171:”
154:“
401:e
394:t
387:v
46:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.