333:
This is a little sparse and for someone that hasn't been tracking this activity a lot, it's hard to follow or figure out what is going on. If this is just a simple manner of getting a statement cited, there should be a {{Fact}} tag on it to request one, unless there was one and it has been repeatedly
324:
I can't really add a lot, it's up to the author(s) of that section to argue their own case, with citations from the time and not any opinions that may have been said retrospectivly. Produce any disinterested statements from reputable parties, at the time, that
Windows NT and it's sucessors was not
343:
It's a simple enough request. That section posits certain opinions that are not backed up by any historical facts. Unless the laws of logic don't apply on
Knowledge (XXG), the burden of proof is on the author. The onus is on the author(s) to provide factual references or have it corrected. The
21:
17:
283:
Windows NT and its successors .. are not designed with
Internet security in mind as much since, when they were first developed, Internet use was less prevalent
334:
removed. In any case, there really needs to be more information to go on, otherwise it's going to take a long time for someone to dig into this. Thanks. -
476:
182:
177:
186:
350:
338:
173:
224:
219:
140:
135:
471:
228:
144:
109:
215:
127:
293:
have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the
Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.
54:
93:
77:
325:
designed for the
Internet. What 'less prevalent' means in relation to the technical innards of an OS is meaningless.
103:
273:
How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)
169:
131:
344:
responce up to now have been a variety of fallacious argumentum absurdum and references to poor grammar.
414:
If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the
Advocacy process, what would it be?
260:
315:
Answer: Ask the authors to provide citations or correct the section to reflect the historical reality.
347:
44:
99:
48:
211:
123:
87:
71:
307:
394:
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your
Advocate was in solving the problem?
290:
424:
If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
465:
404:
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the
Advocacy process is altogether?
83:
360:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
245:
203:
161:
67:
335:
278:
Answer: The
Security section is innacurate and not neutral point of view .
384:
On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your
Advocate?
374:
Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
241:
237:
233:
199:
195:
191:
157:
153:
149:
18:
Knowledge (XXG):Association of Members' Advocates
8:
364:Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
117:Knowledge (XXG) pages this pertains to:
7:
62:Other Wikipedians this pertains to:
28:
477:AMA Requests for Assistance/Cases
306:What do you expect to get from
1:
285:, Microsoft_Windows#Security
472:AMA Requests for Assistance
493:
351:16:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
339:23:48, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
39:Wikipedian filing request:
34:18:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
302:Informal mediation ..
170:Talk:Microsoft_Windows
291:Dispute Resolution
259:Have you read the
212:User_talk:Warrens
124:Microsoft_Windows
484:
453:Advocate Status:
448:
289:What methods of
249:
231:
207:
189:
165:
147:
492:
491:
487:
486:
485:
483:
482:
481:
462:
461:
444:
439:
437:AMA Information
358:
331:
322:
256:
222:
210:
180:
168:
138:
122:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
490:
488:
480:
479:
474:
464:
463:
460:
459:
458:None assigned.
451:
438:
435:
433:
431:
430:
421:
420:
411:
410:
401:
400:
391:
390:
381:
380:
371:
370:
357:
354:
330:
327:
321:
318:
317:
316:
300:
299:
280:
279:
270:
269:
255:
252:
251:
250:
208:
166:
114:
113:
100:SchmuckyTheCat
97:
81:
59:
58:
32:Case Filed On:
30:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
489:
478:
475:
473:
470:
469:
467:
457:
456:
455:
454:
449:
447:
443:
436:
434:
428:
427:
426:
425:
418:
417:
416:
415:
408:
407:
406:
405:
398:
397:
396:
395:
388:
387:
386:
385:
378:
377:
376:
375:
368:
367:
366:
365:
361:
355:
353:
352:
349:
345:
341:
340:
337:
328:
326:
319:
314:
313:
312:
311:
309:
303:
297:
296:
295:
294:
292:
286:
284:
277:
276:
275:
274:
267:
266:
265:
264:
262:
253:
247:
243:
239:
235:
230:
226:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
188:
184:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
146:
142:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
120:
119:
118:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
95:
92:
89:
85:
82:
79:
76:
73:
69:
66:
65:
64:
63:
56:
53:
50:
46:
43:
42:
41:
40:
36:
33:
23:
19:
452:
450:
445:
442:Case Status:
441:
440:
432:
423:
422:
413:
412:
403:
402:
393:
392:
383:
382:
373:
372:
363:
362:
359:
346:
342:
332:
323:
305:
304:
301:
288:
287:
282:
281:
272:
271:
258:
257:
116:
115:
106:
90:
74:
61:
60:
51:
38:
37:
31:
29:
329:Discussion:
268:Answer: Yes
466:Categories
254:Questions:
356:Followup:
348:emacsuser
45:emacsuser
320:Summary:
308:Advocacy
110:contribs
94:contribs
78:contribs
55:contribs
22:Requests
20: |
429:Answer:
419:Answer:
409:Answer:
399:Answer:
389:Answer:
379:Answer:
369:Answer:
298:Answer:
261:AMA FAQ
225:protect
220:history
183:protect
178:history
141:protect
136:history
84:Snowolf
229:delete
218:| ] |
187:delete
176:| ] |
145:delete
68:Warren
336:Cquan
246:views
238:watch
234:links
204:views
196:watch
192:links
162:views
154:watch
150:links
16:<
242:logs
216:edit
200:logs
174:edit
158:logs
132:talk
128:edit
104:talk
88:talk
72:talk
49:talk
446:NEW
468::
244:|
240:|
236:|
232:|
227:|
223:|
202:|
198:|
194:|
190:|
185:|
181:|
160:|
156:|
152:|
148:|
143:|
139:|
134:|
130:|
310:?
263:?
248:)
214:(
206:)
172:(
164:)
126:(
112:)
107:·
102:(
96:)
91:·
86:(
80:)
75:·
70:(
57:)
52:·
47:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.