783:. I don't think that the fact that Bgwhite has not responded to any messages after BU Rob 13 started trying to communicate him is unrelated. Rob has in the past proposed and other reasons why I have to lose my admin rights. Sometimes it feels like the reason is only the excuse and not the main problem. It was clear I was to ask for "interaction zero" with Rob and even ask to examine if their actions led to weakening the project by discouraging people. I feel like they got here first only to name the discussion after my name and not after them.
2048:
firm 2 month ban and leaving the community with the option to lift the ban or continue it as they see fit after that time. If no consensus is reached then, I would suggest the ban automatically be lifted at that point (i.e definite consensus needed to extend the ban). I would also ask/suggest that any breach of this ban be reported to the
Arbitration Committee rather than raising the issue at ANI. ... (includes) any new or existing additional accounts without a bot flag beginning to use AWB or any other semi-automated or automated tools.
123:
1800:
pattern of edits via semi-automated tools from his main account where this might reasonably be perceived as evading the block. In this circumstance, Magioladitis (like any other editor) should await discussion and consensus as to whether or not the edits are permissible and useful, and resume making such edits through any account only if and when the consensus is favorable.
1186:. If you believe there is useful broader context to provide for this case - e.g. that Magioladitis does or doesn't have a higher error rate than other editors doing similar work, or that there are specific and identifiable problems with cases about bots, or whatever, it's looking like the evidence page of this case will be the best venue for those topics.
2709:
1301:(however that is a slippery slope: 2 accepts in an hour, if the timing of a filing party is right, you could easily have 10 accepts by the time a named party wakes up). There is no reason that ALL of you can't wait 24 hours after all named parties have put opening statements (and give it a max of 72 hours since opening of the case).
1176:
request and last year's request naming Fram - should tell you just exactly how effective it is to file early for the sake of getting to frame the case. Hammersoft's analysis would be more convincing if cases were randomly assigned to the name-by-user or name-by-topic condition, but as stated it overlooks prior probability.
2432:, to clarify whether bot tasks he wishes to undertake, or is currently undertaking, are permitted under remedy 1.1 of this case. Once a question has been answered, and discussion closed, by an uninvolved BAG member or administrator, Magioladitis is not permitted to raise the same question again, except in a
2775:
While asking the enforcing administrator and seeking reviews at AN or AE are not mandatory prior to seeking a decision from the committee, once the committee has reviewed a request, further substantive review at any forum is barred. The sole exception is editors under an active sanction who may still
2742:
Administrators are free to modify sanctions placed by former administrators – that is, editors who do not have the administrator permission enabled (due to a temporary or permanent relinquishment or desysop) – without regard to the requirements of this section. If an administrator modifies a sanction
1680:
edits are not usually considered cosmetic but still need consensus to be done by bots. Bots should not make edits which are purely cosmetic; however, when making an approved substantive change, bots may simultaneously make edits that would otherwise be considered cosmetic. Exceptions for bots to make
1582:
4) Editors are accountable for their conduct. As such, they are expected to respond appropriately to queries about their actions and to justify them where needed. Where the
Arbitration Committee, the community or other authorised person imposes a sanction, editors are expected to comply with both the
748:
In response to
Magioladitis' section; I've started discussions to revoke approval from bots making cosmetic edits. This was clean-up from when Magioladitis was a BAG member and approved cosmetic-only bot edits with no consensus (including for the friends he's self-identified below). I always approach
1977:
In the discussions which ensued with
Justlettersandnumbers and Materialscientist, Magioladitis stated that he was aware two bots were already making these changes. He also stated that the reason he was making these edits, and not leaving them for the bots, was that he wanted to make general fixes as
1721:
9) For the purposes of dispute resolution, whether an editor is engaging in "high-speed editing" (that is, the number of edits per minute) is irrelevant. Where editors have made a number of similar edits in a short time space and other editors have raised concerns about those edits, the editor is to
1303:
However, you'll see that there were only two accepts in the period before
Magioladitis became active. We have certainly had cases involving users who have retired or otherwise become inactive, but I certainly don't know of any recently where so many votes to accept a case were cast while a party was
1235:
I'm not sure I buy the idea that a case titled "Magioladitis" to review the actions of
Magioladitis is liable to bias the case any more than a case titled "Px4AX7WDxfEQM5h" to review the actions of Magioladitis would. Regardless, I think you're probably better off bringing this up in a broader forum
2047:
The proposal to ban
Magioladitis from using AWB passes, and he is banned from using AWB or any other semi-automated or automated editing tools on his main account for a period of 2 months ... Magioladitis can appeal to the community for his AWB ban to be removed on or after 7 September, so giving a
1542:
2) Editors should use their best efforts to communicate with one another, particularly when disputes arise. When an editor's input is consistently unclear or difficult to follow, the merits of his or her position may not be fully understood by those reading the communication. An editor's failure to
1005:
I'll be deferring to the evidence and workshop phase to determine what the focus of this case will be, which may very well be editor conduct or something other. The case already has a significant history and I deem that aspect to be by far the greatest contributing factors to the decision to accept
794:
There is no reason to regret to start this case. It's been months since the last time we really discussed this and it would be good to evaluate the various aspects proposed. how they got implemented, how both sides used the results of the ArbCom and who really promoted drama. Everything was planned
778:
After the ArbCom resulted RU Rob 13 was unhappy from that because from day 0 they wanted blood. They did not act only against me but went after the tasks I have approved as BAG member, the people I work as team (Bgwhite, Ladsgroup, et al.). Instead of seeking a compromise between two different good
739:
I'm coming here with the question of whether the pattern of conduct since the previous case is compatible with adminship. It is unprecedented for an administrator to be given two topic bans and a block for violating a ban within three weeks. Add on the ArbCom restrictions just four months ago and I
2460:
Lifted subject to a probationary period lasting 1 year from 08 January 2020. During this period, any uninvolved administrator may re-impose the remedy as an arbitration enforcement action, subject to appeal only to the
Arbitration Committee. If the probationary period elapses without incident, the
1162:
Speaking of cognitive biases... I dunno, Beetstra, some people here seem to be hearing what they expect to hear more than what's really said. We are familiar with the facts of this case, because the current committee has already reviewed this matter in depth. That is materially different than, for
893:
named after individuals are significantly more likely seeking resolutions regarding topics or procedures; cases named after individuals are usually, more often than not, about conduct. I'd be curious to see a comparisons between all cases where a single individual editor's conduct was the locus of
850:
of these discussions unfolding over the past week. I believe we have comprehensively come to a point whereby the community has exhausted a considerable amount of time attempting to resolve or remedy the situation. While I understand the recent block was contentious, there is a responsibility to at
770:
It's clear that we have a ongoing drama. I am started an effort to disengage from that the last days. Recall that the main discussion started from the fact that edits that in general are considered beneficial should or should not be done in a systematic way. After the ArbCom I focused of finding a
753:
instances where I've started a discussion querying whether a bot approval should be revoked, the community has agreed with me and revoked the approval. In contrast, Magioladitis has tried multiple times to request my bots be reviewed due to minor bugs normal for any operator without any discussion
1566:
are trusted members of the community who are expected to lead by example. They are expected to follow
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and restrictions which are placed upon them. Occasional mistakes are entirely compatible with this; administrators are not expected to be perfect. However, sustained or
1526:
1) The purpose of
Knowledge (XXG) is to create a high-quality, free-content encyclopedia in an atmosphere of camaraderie and mutual respect among contributors. Contributors whose actions are detrimental to that goal may be asked to refrain from them, even when these actions are undertaken in good
1175:
should do nicely. Conversely, the most seemingly-prejudicial case name in the recent past was "Vested Contributors" (later AE2), which of course does not name any editors. A look through some of the rejected requests of the past couple of years - I suggest in particular the recent Godsy/Legacypac
1163:
example, the War of the Pacific case (about which I knew nothing whatsoever before it appeared on our pages), or the common situation in which the current committee is asked at ARCA to "clarify" a decision made five years ago. (Nowhere else on Knowledge (XXG) do I feel more like an example of the
1106:
As for the idea that Magioladitis is being railroaded: I wrote the original PD in the Magioladitis case, which focused heavily on recommending that the community work out clearer parameters for what would be considered a "cosmetic" edit, and included a quite mild remedy for Magioladitis himself.
938:
demonstrates my point on why discussing a procedural issue during a case will interfere with one another and may potentially sabotage the case by distracting it. My comment above in no way was speaking to this case and I was responding directly to comments made by Hammersoft about their study on
2783:
All actions designated as arbitration enforcement actions, including those alleged to be out of process or against existing policy, must first be appealed following arbitration enforcement procedures to establish if such enforcement is inappropriate before the action may be reversed or formally
2779:
These provisions apply only to contentious topics placed by administrators and to blocks placed by administrators to enforce arbitration case decisions. They do not apply to sanctions directly authorised by the committee, and enacted either by arbitrators or by arbitration clerks, or to special
1779:
7.1) Making any semi-automated edits which do not affect the rendered visual output of a page. This restriction does not apply to edits which address issues related to accessibility guidelines. Further, Magioladitis may seek consensus to perform a specific type of semi-automated edit that would
1646:
whether high-speed or large-scale edits that involve errors an attentive human would not make are actually being performed by a bot, by a human assisted by a script, or even by a human without any programmatic assistance. No matter the method, the disruptive editing must stop or the user may be
786:
Here we have a gradual escalation of unnecessary drama. My edits have reduced, better rules have been set, I started the procedure to ask permission for certain edits and I have opened BRFAs for the various tasks. The ongoing drama has made the BRFA uncomfortable to re-allow general fixes that,
1799:
8) Performing the same or similar series of edits in an automated fashion using a bot and in a semi-automated fashion on his main account is acceptable only as long as the edits are not contentious. Should Yobot be stopped or blocked for a series of edits, Magioladitis may not perform the same
1698:(genfixes) are a package of common fixes which can be enabled in bulk in AWB by the user/bot operator. Some general fixes are substantive, while others are cosmetic. It is the responsibility of the bot operator or editor using AWB to ensure that their editing falls within policy, including the
1598:
5) Editors who have been sanctioned, whether by the Arbitration Committee or the community, for improper conduct are expected to avoid conduct which is below Knowledge (XXG)'s expectations. Failure to demonstrate appropriate conduct may result in the editor being subject to increasingly severe
989:
It's important to note that 'accepting the case' is not the same thing as 'accepting the viewpoint of the filing party'. I'm not sure why that's being assumed. Many of the broad issues being brought up are arguments that have already been brought up and responded to by all parties involved; an
2254:
As an additional exception, Magioladitis may continue to participate in any active discussion he has started from before the topic ban until its natural conclusion. He may not start new threads, subthreads, or unarchive old threads, and a discussion is considered concluded when the thread is
790:
I don't think the ongoing drama affected me as admin. I keep helping with the best way I can. Escalating a discussion about minor, and still positive edits, to an admin drama, I don't think it's beneficial to Knowledge (XXG) and to the Wikimedia Movement. We already lost a highly active admin
2608:
of the Magioladitis case is lifted subject to a probationary period lasting 1 year from the date this motion is enacted. During this period, any uninvolved administrator may re-impose the remedy as an arbitration enforcement action, subject to appeal only to the Arbitration Committee. If the
973:
recognized this was a major problem as the policies were in conflict with either the community practice or were simply unclear. ArbCom does not decide matters of policy, which is why the community was encouraged to remedy these policy issues. Evaluating whether clear instruction has now been
771:
way to do these edits with the less disruption for the community and after that community reformed COSMETICBOT to better reflet community consensus. Any conflicts have not at all affected the readers and a small fraction of admins have in fact participated in the ongoing discussions.
1148:"Arbcom is too speedy" is not a complaint that comes up much ;) In addition to the point GW makes below, there's also the fact that the background to this case is already familiar to most of us, since the previous case was recent and we were aware of the community restrictions.
1111:
the PD was posted, including Magioladitis' own response and feedback from others following the case, led to a somewhat stronger remedy. It's hard to read that trajectory as being the result of some kind of bias against him or desire to throw him under the bus.
2080:
The ISBN edits also effectively disregarded the spirit of the reminder issued by the Arbitration Committee which only specified that he should not make edits which Yobot has been "stopped or blocked" from making (not edits which are still pending approval).
2676:
Appeals may be made only by the editor under sanction and only for a currently active sanction. Requests for modification of page restrictions may be made by any editor. The process has three possible stages (see "Important notes" below). The editor may:
2383:(that is, where there is no substantive change made in the same edit). However, Magioladitis may make (without a substantive change in the same edit) or bundle (for example, as part of "general fixes") cosmetic changes from his bot account if the
2743:
placed by a former administrator, the administrator who made the modification becomes the "enforcing administrator". If a former administrator regains the tools, the provisions of this section again apply to their unmodified enforcement actions.
1262:. If it is directly related, I'd really appreciate if you could rephrase the comment directed to me, because I'm not sure what you're saying. If you don't think it's possible to do so within the word limits, you can request an extension.
1614:
6) Fully automated bot editing and semi-automated editing scripts perform an important and valuable function on Knowledge (XXG). To facilitate the regulation and coordination of automated editing, the community has a long-established
72:
1257:
I genuinely have no idea what your reply means. If you're worried about word limits and you want to start a discussion about something not directly related to this case request, feel free to leave a message on my talk page or at
974:
provided, I would hope, continues to remain a critical factor if and when the issue of conduct comes up, which it certainly will by way of the case request, other comments, and the previous recent attempts at dispute resolution.
2182:
at the Administrators' noticeboard was started following Magioladitis' having started a number of similar discussions about the COSMETICBOT policy. In this discussion, Magioladitis was accused of disrupting Knowledge (XXG) by
796:
1482:. Note to all editors: The case will be formally opened in the next day or two and evidence will be accepted at that time. Further statements on whether we should accept or decline the case, at this point, are not necessary.
1509:
67:
2738:
Nothing in this section prevents an administrator from replacing an existing sanction issued by another administrator with a new sanction if fresh misconduct has taken place after the existing sanction was applied.
2666:
This procedure applies to appeals related to, and modifications of, actions taken by administrators to enforce the Committee's remedies. It does not apply to appeals related to the remedies directly enacted by the
2776:
request an easing or removal of the sanction on the grounds that said sanction is no longer needed, but such requests may only be made once every six months, or whatever longer period the committee may specify.
2633:
0) Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked, initially for up to one month, and then with blocks increasing in duration to a maximum of one year.
61:
50:
2494:
tasks. For clarity, he may discuss AWB and similar tools (notwithstanding his other sanctions), but may not make edits using them (or a derivative) on the English Knowledge (XXG). This sanction supersedes the
2022:
that he did not believe he should have to stop making semi-automated edits when only one editor (even though he had been asked by both Justlettersandnumbers and Materialscientist) had requested that he stop.
1567:
serious disruption of Knowledge (XXG) is incompatible with the expectations and responsibilities of administrators, and consistent or egregious poor judgement may result in the removal of administrator tools.
774:
I think the last ArbCom left some things in a gray area exactly because the general belief is that some edits should be done one way or another and we hav to find a way to cooperate in a friendly environment.
990:
additional re-summary for the sake of procedure does not change whether some of us are already familiar with the situation; it was abundantly clear that this case was inevitably going to be heading our way.
1346:
I been watching this on and off and believe that we are at the point where the Committee needs to become involved to examine the suitability of Magioladitis to continue holding the admin bit. Specifically,
647:
1172:
344:
713:
outside an approved bot task. The latter topic ban was based on a pattern of editing exactly described by the Committee's reminder in the previous case; underlying editing patterns have not changed.
1784:. Any uninvolved administrator may close such a discussion with consensus to perform a specific type of semi-automated edit. All discussions should be logged on the case page, regardless of outcome.
1236:
than individual ArbCom cases, since these statements will shortly be archived or moved (depending on whether the case is accepted) and won't be in a great place for continued discussion either way.
56:
45:
589:
2696:
517:
381:
213:
1182:
this one, and strongly recommend that any further commentary about case names and procedures, real or alleged cognitive biases, and other matters not related to this specific request move to
1543:
respond to concerns with sufficient clarity, conciseness and detail, or failure to focus on the topic being discussed, can impede both collaborative editing and dispute resolution. It is a
146:
39:
2609:
probationary period elapses without incident, the restriction is to be considered permanently lifted. For clarity, Magioladitis' prohibition on making cosmetic edits will remain in force.
2236:
2232:
886:
1065:
While you were complaining about the length of BU Rob13's statement, he reduced his below 500 words while your statement has ballooned to 61 words over the limit as of my writing this.
375:
709:
with narrow exceptions. In response to making high-speed bot-like edits from his main account while a Yobot bot task was pending approval, the community enacted a second topic ban on
1851:
1168:
339:
2388:
2106:
1883:
1772:
966:
671:
371:
167:
159:
2157:
2137:
1822:
1902:
313:
2355:
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
333:
178:
156:
2796:
2685:
2640:
525:
366:
304:
223:
151:
1033:. With his latest swings and misses, Magioladitis has struck out many times over, and I have a suspicion that his batting average has dropped well below the
805:
Rob has written more words than the allowed space. Please do not allow any further comments. Rob keeps rewriting and commenting using this page as a forum.
755:
2163:
During these discussions, Magioladitis was requested to stop starting discussions about the COSMETICBOT policy as his proposals were not gaining traction.
1083:
I think we need to hear from Magioladitis first, but there does seem to be an awful lot of community time being spent on this that shouldn't be necessary.
2290:) for making edits in violation of his community-imposed topic ban relating to participating in discussions about the COSMETICBOT policy. He made another
949:
869:
309:
2219:
Magioladitis may, in good faith, seek specific clarifications on how to interpret COSMETICBOT for his own bots and projects he is involved with (such as
319:
299:
182:
2689:
324:
237:
218:
440:
2820:
965:
case comes from the last one and not because of the case title. I would not be opposed to renaming the case COSMETICBOT if the case was accepted.
516:
as needed, but the other content of this page may not be edited except by clerks or arbitrators. Please raise any questions about this decision at
358:
249:
2836:
2153:
2149:
2141:
2133:
1703:
521:
282:
2069:
concerns raised by community members by continuing to make semi-automated edits after being asked not to by community members. These edits are
1104:
to continue the momentum toward the net-4 threshold, and to highlight the specific issue I hoped Magioladitis would address in his statement.
208:
137:
25:
2012:
1865:
1787:
10) Unblocking their own bot when it has been blocked by another administrator. After discussion with the blocking administrator and/or on
758:. One of the former actions is enforcing policy while the other is blatant harassment. I trust the Committee can determine which is which.
2461:
restriction is to be considered permanently lifted. For clarity, Magioladitis' prohibition on making cosmetic edits will remain in force.
889:. Any discussion should ask the question whether there are other factors that require consideration. For example, I would estimate cases
2334:
the intent of the topic ban (which was to remove Magioladitis from discussions concerning COSMETICBOT, with limited exceptions) and was
2114:
2578:
2541:
2479:
2417:
2376:
1753:
611:
274:
114:
260:
203:
21:
2196:
Magioladitis is topic banned from initiating or participating in discussions concerning the amendment, removal, or replacement of
694:
described that case request as "strike two", and the Committee generally agreed that misuse of administrative tools had occurred.
623:
2074:
195:
2615:
2515:
2321:
2287:
2179:
2132:
10) From 30 Dec 2016 to 28 Feb 2017, Magioladitis started two discussions related to the COSMETICBOT policy and general fixes (
2110:
2039:
1967:
1955:
1378:
683:
641:
629:
472:
744:
territory. The community cannot make a decision to desysop under current policy. ArbCom is the proper venue to evaluate this.
245:
143:
1879:
1836:
1469:
617:
553:
255:
173:
2208:
with their own bots, or theoretical bots which may be developed in the future). As an exception to this ban, he may make a
635:
2140:). From 12 Jun to 20 Jun 2017, Magioladitis started five discussion related to the COSMETICBOT policy and general fixes (
1886:, to make the same changes. Neither bot made other "general fixes" (or "genfixes") to the page while changing the ISBNs.
1299:. Only Mkdw, Ks0stm, and Opabinia regalis commented on the case request between those two times. I hear your point that
565:
433:
2819:
Any block, restriction, ban, or sanction performed under the authorisation of a remedy for this case must be logged at
717:
2295:
2019:
1916:
1041:. Also will note that I'm particularly disgruntled with what at first glance appear to be attempts by Magioladitis to
583:
571:
2224:
1563:
2700:
1959:
1191:
1153:
1139:
1117:
1088:
559:
294:
1394:
I'm sorry that it's come to this, but I don't see any other way of resolving the issues than to accept this case.
2760:(i) the clear and substantial consensus of (a) uninvolved administrators at AE or (b) uninvolved editors at AN or
2006:
1859:
577:
2490:), on the English Knowledge (XXG). This prohibition does not apply to bots operated by Magioladitis undertaking
2070:
1971:
1924:
1491:
1473:
1450:
1433:
1415:
1403:
1386:
1334:
1313:
1271:
1245:
1219:
1195:
1157:
1143:
1121:
1092:
1073:
1053:
1016:
1000:
984:
904:
398:
2731:
prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" below).
1330:
1309:
1267:
1241:
1215:
2421:
2380:
2248:
2240:
2201:
2197:
2102:
1682:
1667:
702:
675:
133:
17:
2216:
short replies (<300 words) to other editors when directly asked a question (1 reply per direct question).
2204:
on other bot operators (such as whether or not bot operators are allowed, or should be required, to perform
1756:), which has led to sanctions previously being imposed both by the Arbitration Committee and the community.
426:
2572:
2535:
2473:
2411:
2370:
2302:
2291:
2273:
2145:
1998:
1963:
1936:
1747:
710:
706:
605:
2487:
2244:
2220:
1954:
5) At 19:36, 21 June 2017 (UTC), less than two hours after Magioladitis started, the first objection was
1647:
sanctioned. However, merely editing quickly, particularly for a short time, is not by itself disruptive.
1352:
1348:
1038:
856:
852:
741:
2735:
Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped.
1487:
1400:
1382:
1284:
1187:
1149:
1135:
1113:
1084:
2205:
2188:
1695:
1666:
if they affect something visible to readers and consumers of Knowledge (XXG) in any medium (subject to
1289:
BU Rob13 left a notification about the ArbCom case immediately after he filed it at 04:23, 16 July 2017
1259:
1183:
882:
698:
670:
I think there's no choice but to kick this back to the Arbitration Committee for review. In March, the
1775:
was held to examine Magioladitis' conduct. As a result of the case, Magioladitis was restricted from:
2042:
at the Administrators' noticeboard for incidents was started in July 2017. There was consensus that:
2002:
1855:
89:
1970:
a similar concern on Magioladitis's talk page. Magioladitis' last ISBN edit (in this series) was at
1686:
1643:
1544:
2281:
1374:
1326:
1305:
1263:
1237:
1211:
682:. It also closed with a reminder to avoid undesirable editing patterns. In late March/early April,
103:
2567:
6) For consistent poor judgement and failure to follow Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines,
1699:
1616:
1042:
1873:
1830:
1463:
1320:
969:, the community was encouraged to review common fixes and COSMETICBOT. The Arbitration Committee
547:
2335:
2191:
by creating a number of similar discussions in a short time-span. The discussion resolved that:
2184:
2424:, including discussions concerning its impact. Magioladitis may ask specific questions, at the
939:
bias. If comments about that discussion and the case cannot be separated, then case and point.
2568:
2549:
2531:
2469:
2407:
2366:
1743:
1446:
1207:
1060:
1006:
the case. A case request is not the place where the decisions or scope should be determined.`
600:
2491:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2384:
2331:
2228:
2066:
1788:
1624:
721:
2548:
before being used. He is indefinitely prohibited from making automated edits from his main (
1483:
1395:
400:
2582:
2545:
2483:
2420:) is indefinitely prohibited from initiating or participating in any discussion concerning
2223:), but may only do so on his bots' talk page, at the relevant project's talk page (such as
2212:!vote with a short (<300 words) rationale if the discussion calls for !voting, and give
1692:
1620:
2724:
No administrator may modify or remove a sanction placed by another administrator without:
1910:
1412:
1360:
1230:
1164:
876:
754:
with me beforehand. Every time, the community has disagreed with Magioladitis. The latest
716:
Magioladitis has already been blocked once for violating his first topic ban due to edits
84:
1781:
1685:
applies only to bots, human editors may also wish to follow this guidance, especially if
1676:
1304:
simply asleep. I would like to think we work that fast, but I don't think that's right.
403:
2277:
2015:) and that he believed this was an opportunity to make general fixes at the same time.
1369:
1014:
998:
982:
947:
902:
867:
98:
2830:
1869:
1844:
1826:
1459:
1429:
1356:
1278:
1252:
1127:
1097:
956:
929:
542:
1442:
1034:
2544:) is reminded that accounts making automated edits (bots) must be approved by the
1923:
to make "genfixes". This task was not approved until 22 July 2017. Beginning from
1167:
in action... ;) And if you need examples of named parties who weren't sanctioned,
697:
Since then, the community has lost patience with Magioladitis. In response to the
402:
122:
2330:. While this was not technically a violation of the topic ban, it does appear to
2239:'s priority be lowered to 'Medium' or 'Low' important?" is fine, asking/arguing "
732:
this is not technically a violation of the ban because he's prohibited only from
1791:, the blocking administrator or an uninvolved administrator may unblock the bot.
1364:
1066:
1046:
749:
the bot operator first, attempting to find a mutually agreeable way forward. In
691:
1939:
that Magioladitis was using the code from his unapproved bot for this editing.
1906:
679:
1008:
992:
976:
941:
896:
861:
687:
2038:
7) In response to Magioladitis's ISBN edits and not stopping when asked, a
2766:
is required. If consensus at AE or AN is unclear, the status quo prevails.
2581:) is desysopped. He may regain the tools at any time through a successful
2379:) is indefinitely prohibited from making any edit which only introduces a
1527:
faith; and good faith actions, where disruptive, may still be sanctioned.
1297:
archived the notice about the case on his talk page at 08:06, 16 July 2017
2728:
the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or
1424:
2001:. Magioladitis indicated that he was working on ISBN links not found by
1512:, where comments and discussion from the voting phase is also available.
1547:
that the operator communicates cordially, promptly, and appropriately.
894:
the dispute, but where case titles were named after the editor or not.
2681:
ask the enforcing administrator to reconsider their original decision;
1997:
making ISBN edits, which he had previously stopped making after being
1935:
to make "genfixes" while still waiting for his bot to be approved. It
2298:. After making two further edits, of the type he was warned to stop (
1478:
Although I wish this weren't necessary, I will join the consensus to
1130:
Assuming you mean the RfC in May, yes, Headbomb pointed it out and I
823:
This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
686:
was filed due to improper talk page deletions. It was declined. Both
2699:. If the editor is blocked, the appeal may be made by email through
1919:), run by Magioladitis, to change the ISBN magic link to templates
1931:
AWB from his main account to change ISBN magic links to templates
1173:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kww and The Rambling Man
524:, and report violations of the remedies passed in the decision to
2445:
Passed 11 to 1 with 1 abstention at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
2117:
and consensus was achieved to adopt a new wording to the policy.
1727:
Passed 12 to 0 with 1 abstention at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1100:, that wasn't really the point of my post - I actually intended
518:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment
2797:
procedure for the standard appeals and modifications provision
728:
an information page defining "cosmetic edits" as he sees fit,
404:
1901:
4) After the RfC referred to above, Magioladitis submitted a
1962:
on Magioladitis's talk page. At 07:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC),
1681:
a purely cosmetic edit must be approved by consensus. While
887:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/War of the Pacific
2437:
2113:
was held from March to May 2017. The RfC was advertised at
2101:
9) Following the Committee's recommendation to clarify the
1978:
well (which would be prohibited as cosmetic on their own).
1868:) was approved to change ISBN magic links to the template.
2799:
adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
2643:
adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
2268:
Magioladitis was blocked for breaching community sanctions
885:. We've had two cases this year, one of which was named
701:
of discussions attempting to remove or completely alter
2326:
2299:
1994:
1928:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1169:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Michael Hardy
1131:
832:
780:
756:
ended with a warning to stop using process to harass me
729:
725:
502:
496:
490:
484:
414:
329:
287:
163:
1670:), while changes that do not are typically considered
1037:, so to speak. More than happy to examine this under
833:
Arbitrators' opinions on hearing this matter (11/0/0)
1325:
Please keep your comments and edit summaries civil.
2387:specifically allows this. This sanction supersedes
1623:responsible for reviewing potential bot operators'
2231:. In other words, asking questions like "When is
2200:, or the in discussions concerning the impact of
512:Once the case is closed, editors should edit the
2641:procedure for the standard enforcement provision
1722:stop making the edits and engage in discussion.
1642:7) For the purpose of dispute resolution, it is
779:faith approaches, they kept criticism sometimes
526:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
2590:Passed 12 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
2557:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
2509:Passed 12 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
2396:Passed 12 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
2343:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
2310:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
2262:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
2194:
2168:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
2122:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
2086:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
2055:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
2045:
2028:Passed 12 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1983:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1944:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1891:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1806:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1761:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1652:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1632:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1604:Passed 12 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1588:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1572:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1552:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1532:Passed 13 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1293:Magioladitis next edited at 08:00, 16 July 2017
1993:6) At 07:46, 30 June 2017 (UTC), Magioladitis
1711:Passed 7 to 0 at 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1795:In addition, Magioladitis was reminded that:
787:recall, was a given thing for six (6) years.
736:COSMETICBOT, not creating information pages.
434:
8:
2763:(ii) a passing motion of arbitrators at ARCA
2496:
2061:Summary of behaviour related to ISBN editing
674:closed with two restrictions, one involving
2821:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration enforcement log
2653:
2455:
2436:if required. This sanction supersedes the
1742:1) This dispute centres on the conduct of
912:
767:Please limit your statement to 500 words.
522:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Arbitration Committee
441:
427:
110:
2361:Prohibited from making cosmetic edits (1)
808:I traditionally take vacation in August.
2482:) is indefinitely prohibited from using
2235:considered a cosmetic edit?" or "Should
1989:Magioladitis continued making ISBN edits
1843:to replace the ISBN magic link with the
1780:normally fall under this restriction at
2701:Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee
2320:13) Also on 12 July 2017, Magioladitis
1839:) with consensus in favour of allowing
720:after multiple warnings. Further, he's
705:, the community enacted a topic ban on
113:
2780:functionary blocks of whatever nature.
2402:COSMETICBOT-discussion prohibition (1)
2294:in violation of the topic ban and was
2272:12) On 12 July 2017, Magioladitis was
2174:Community sanction: COSMETICBOT policy
2115:Knowledge (XXG):Centralized discussion
1658:Cosmetic changes and AWB general fixes
1300:
1206:. I hope that we get a statement from
1178:Aaaanyway, I am going to go ahead and
1367:'s statement) are convincing for me.
881:I would propose this be discussed at
482:Watchlist all case (and talk) pages:
7:
2703:(or, if email access is revoked, to
2605:
2255:archived, either by bot or by user.
2247:fixes, how can we ammend/fix/ignore
1950:Concerns raised regarding ISBN edits
1825:, held in March 2017, was closed by
1662:8) Changes are typically considered
1610:Automated and semi-automated editing
513:
214:Clarification and Amendment requests
2686:arbitration enforcement noticeboard
2065:8) Magioladitis has demonstrated a
1687:making such changes on large scales
1583:letter and spirit of the sanction.
1508:All tallies are based the votes at
711:semi-automated or automated editing
2695:submit a request for amendment at
2227:or an appropriate subpage), or at
1771:2) From January to March 2017, an
1283:Regarding your points directed at
32:
2837:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration cases
2097:Changes to the COSMETICBOT policy
1359:'s statement and the quotes from
1355:are key areas of concern for me.
838:Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)
740:think we're unambiguously within
678:and another involving unblocking
2753:For a request to succeed, either
2707:
465:on 20:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
121:
2720:Modifications by administrators
1817:ISBN edits allowed by consensus
1782:the administrators' noticeboard
2618:at 07:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
2518:at 07:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
476:on 07:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
1:
2672:Appeals by sanctioned editors
2526:Automated editing prohibition
2658:0) Appeals and modifications
2316:Gaming COSMETICBOT topic ban
2092:Magioladitis and COSMETICBOT
1545:condition of operating a bot
457:on 14:06, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
345:Conflict of interest reports
2784:discussed at another venue.
2690:administrators’ noticeboard
2629:Enforcement of restrictions
2486:, or similar tool (such as
1897:Magioladitis and ISBN fixes
1789:the bot owners' noticeboard
1498:Temporary injunction (none)
520:, any general questions at
174:Search archived proceedings
115:Knowledge (XXG) Arbitration
18:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration
2853:
2243:hampers our ability to do
1905:, requesting approval for
1578:Accountability for conduct
1522:Purpose of Knowledge (XXG)
219:Arbitrator motion requests
2708:
2649:Appeals and modifications
2606:Remedy 3: AWB prohibition
2324:an "information page" at
2185:failing to drop the stick
1972:07:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
1925:18:11, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
1767:Previous arbitration case
1625:requests for bot approval
1492:21:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
1474:04:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
1451:22:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
1434:20:59, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
1416:11:35, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
1404:13:46, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
1387:09:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
1335:21:13, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
1314:05:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
1272:05:04, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
1246:01:54, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
1220:16:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
1196:05:50, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
1158:06:46, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
1144:01:56, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
1134:a note on the case page.
1122:22:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
1093:06:42, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
1074:03:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
1054:05:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
1017:22:57, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
1001:19:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
985:21:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
950:20:59, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
905:20:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
870:04:57, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
797:"See you in three months"
763:Statement by Magioladitis
2430:bot request for approval
2385:bot request for approval
799:(Rob, 10 February 2017)
656:Prior dispute resolution
2795:In accordance with the
2774:
2639:In accordance with the
2189:bludgeoning the process
2128:COSMETICBOT discussions
2034:Community sanction: AWB
934:Actually, your comment
2684:request review at the
2499:applied in July 2017.
2440:applied in June 2017.
2391:of the original case.
2257:
2050:
1441:regretfully per Doug.
707:discussing COSMETICBOT
661:Preliminary statements
2583:request for adminship
2434:clarification request
2111:a request for comment
2067:failure to understand
1960:Justlettersandnumbers
1558:Administrator conduct
846:I have been watching
791:(Bgwhite) from that.
781:even without checking
666:Statement by BU Rob13
415:Track related changes
275:Arbitration Committee
2601:Motion: Magioladitis
2303:blocked for two days
2178:11) In June 2017, a
2073:and border on being
1903:bot approval request
967:During the last case
961:My familiarity with
812:Preliminary decision
684:another case request
224:Enforcement requests
152:Guide to arbitration
2546:bot approvals group
1882:) was approved, on
1823:request for comment
1621:Bot Approvals Group
95:Drafting arbitrator
2497:community sanction
2438:community sanction
1717:High-speed editing
1668:certain exceptions
1594:Repeated behaviour
1510:/Proposed decision
246:Contentious topics
144:Arbitration policy
2790:
2789:
2688:("AE") or at the
2614:Passed 9 to 0 by
2550:User:Magioladitis
2504:
2503:
2357:
2107:the previous case
2018:However, he also
1964:Materialscientist
1706:(if applicable).
1333:
1312:
1270:
1244:
1218:
1026:
1025:
839:
509:
451:
450:
418:
386:
256:General sanctions
204:All open requests
134:About arbitration
107:
93:
76:
68:Proposed decision
65:
54:
43:
2844:
2714:
2712:
2711:
2710:
2654:
2456:
2353:
2329:
1773:arbitration case
1738:Locus of dispute
1733:Findings of fact
1638:Bot-like editing
1398:
1329:
1324:
1308:
1285:Opabinia regalis
1282:
1266:
1256:
1240:
1234:
1214:
1188:Opabinia regalis
1150:Opabinia regalis
1136:Opabinia regalis
1114:Opabinia regalis
1085:Opabinia regalis
1071:
1064:
1051:
1011:
995:
979:
960:
944:
933:
913:
899:
880:
864:
837:
676:cosmetic editing
651:
593:
537:Involved parties
532:Case information
514:#Enforcement log
508:
507:
480:
471:Case amended by
443:
436:
429:
417:
412:
405:
384:
340:Clerk procedures
332:
290:
261:Editor sanctions
238:Active sanctions
196:Open proceedings
166:
125:
111:
101:
87:
70:
59:
48:
37:
2852:
2851:
2847:
2846:
2845:
2843:
2842:
2841:
2827:
2826:
2816:
2814:Enforcement log
2791:
2747:Important notes
2706:
2704:
2659:
2651:
2631:
2626:
2603:
2598:
2565:
2528:
2505:
2462:
2453:
2451:AWB prohibition
2426:bot noticeboard
2404:
2381:cosmetic change
2363:
2351:
2327:WP:COSMETICEDIT
2325:
2318:
2270:
2258:
2176:
2130:
2099:
2094:
2063:
2051:
2036:
2003:Magic links bot
1991:
1952:
1927:, Magioladitis
1899:
1856:Magic links bot
1819:
1814:
1769:
1740:
1735:
1719:
1660:
1640:
1612:
1596:
1580:
1560:
1540:
1524:
1519:
1505:
1500:
1458:per preceding.
1396:
1318:
1276:
1250:
1228:
1165:Peter Principle
1067:
1058:
1047:
1043:game the system
1027:
1009:
993:
977:
954:
942:
927:
918:
897:
874:
862:
835:
819:
814:
765:
668:
663:
658:
603:
545:
539:
534:
510:
483:
481:
477:
466:
458:
447:
413:
407:
406:
401:
391:
390:
389:
378:
361:
351:
350:
349:
336:
328:
316:
291:
286:
277:
267:
266:
265:
240:
230:
229:
228:
198:
188:
185:
170:
162:
140:
109:
30:
29:
28:
12:
11:
5:
2850:
2848:
2840:
2839:
2829:
2828:
2815:
2812:
2811:
2810:
2809:
2808:
2802:
2801:
2788:
2787:
2786:
2785:
2781:
2777:
2773:
2770:
2769:
2768:
2767:
2764:
2761:
2755:
2754:
2733:
2732:
2729:
2722:
2721:
2717:
2716:
2693:
2682:
2674:
2673:
2661:
2660:
2657:
2652:
2650:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2630:
2627:
2625:
2622:
2621:
2620:
2602:
2599:
2597:
2594:
2593:
2592:
2564:
2561:
2560:
2559:
2527:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2502:
2501:
2464:
2463:
2459:
2454:
2452:
2449:
2448:
2447:
2422:WP:COSMETICBOT
2403:
2400:
2399:
2398:
2362:
2359:
2350:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2317:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2296:further warned
2269:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2249:WP:COSMETICBOT
2241:WP:COSMETICBOT
2202:WP:COSMETICBOT
2198:WP:COSMETICBOT
2193:
2175:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2129:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2103:WP:COSMETICBOT
2098:
2095:
2093:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2062:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2044:
2035:
2032:
2031:
2030:
1990:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1951:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1898:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1818:
1815:
1813:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1802:
1801:
1793:
1792:
1785:
1768:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1739:
1736:
1734:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1718:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1683:WP:COSMETICBOT
1659:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1639:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1611:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1595:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1579:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1564:Administrators
1559:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1539:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1523:
1520:
1518:
1515:
1504:
1503:Final decision
1501:
1499:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1476:
1453:
1436:
1418:
1406:
1389:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1327:GorillaWarfare
1316:
1306:GorillaWarfare
1274:
1264:GorillaWarfare
1248:
1238:GorillaWarfare
1223:
1222:
1212:GorillaWarfare
1201:
1200:
1199:
1160:
1146:
1125:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1003:
987:
952:
920:
919:
917:Comments moved
916:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
851:least look at
834:
831:
830:
829:
826:
825:
818:
815:
813:
810:
764:
761:
760:
759:
703:WP:COSMETICBOT
667:
664:
662:
659:
657:
654:
653:
652:
598:
538:
535:
533:
530:
479:
469:
461:
453:
449:
448:
446:
445:
438:
431:
423:
420:
419:
409:
408:
399:
397:
396:
393:
392:
388:
387:
379:
374:
369:
363:
362:
357:
356:
353:
352:
348:
347:
342:
337:
327:
322:
317:
312:
307:
302:
297:
292:
285:
279:
278:
273:
272:
269:
268:
264:
263:
258:
253:
242:
241:
236:
235:
232:
231:
227:
226:
221:
216:
211:
206:
200:
199:
194:
193:
190:
189:
187:
186:
181:
176:
171:
161:
154:
149:
141:
136:
130:
127:
126:
118:
117:
35:Main case page
33:
31:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2849:
2838:
2835:
2834:
2832:
2825:
2824:
2822:
2813:
2807:
2806:
2804:
2803:
2800:
2798:
2793:
2792:
2782:
2778:
2772:
2771:
2765:
2762:
2759:
2758:
2757:
2756:
2752:
2751:
2750:
2748:
2744:
2740:
2736:
2730:
2727:
2726:
2725:
2719:
2718:
2713:wikimedia.org
2702:
2698:
2694:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2680:
2679:
2678:
2671:
2670:
2669:
2668:
2663:
2662:
2656:
2655:
2648:
2644:
2642:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2628:
2623:
2619:
2617:
2612:
2611:
2610:
2607:
2600:
2595:
2591:
2588:
2587:
2586:
2584:
2580:
2577:
2574:
2570:
2562:
2558:
2555:
2554:
2553:
2551:
2547:
2543:
2540:
2537:
2533:
2525:
2519:
2517:
2512:
2511:
2510:
2507:
2506:
2500:
2498:
2493:
2489:
2485:
2481:
2478:
2475:
2471:
2466:
2465:
2458:
2457:
2450:
2446:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2439:
2435:
2431:
2427:
2423:
2419:
2416:
2413:
2409:
2401:
2397:
2394:
2393:
2392:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2378:
2375:
2372:
2368:
2360:
2358:
2356:
2348:
2344:
2341:
2340:
2339:
2337:
2333:
2328:
2323:
2315:
2311:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2304:
2300:
2297:
2293:
2289:
2286:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2267:
2263:
2260:
2259:
2256:
2252:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2238:
2234:
2230:
2226:
2222:
2217:
2215:
2211:
2207:
2203:
2199:
2192:
2190:
2186:
2181:
2173:
2169:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2161:
2159:
2155:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2127:
2123:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2096:
2091:
2087:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2078:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2060:
2056:
2053:
2052:
2049:
2043:
2041:
2033:
2029:
2026:
2025:
2024:
2021:
2016:
2014:
2011:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1988:
1984:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1975:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1957:
1949:
1945:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1915:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1896:
1892:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1885:
1881:
1878:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1864:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1848:
1846:
1845:ISBN template
1842:
1838:
1835:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1816:
1811:
1807:
1804:
1803:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1790:
1786:
1783:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1774:
1766:
1762:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1755:
1752:
1749:
1745:
1737:
1732:
1728:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1716:
1712:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1696:general fixes
1694:
1690:
1688:
1684:
1679:
1678:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1657:
1653:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1645:
1637:
1633:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1609:
1605:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1593:
1589:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1577:
1573:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1565:
1557:
1553:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1546:
1538:Communication
1537:
1533:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1521:
1516:
1514:
1513:
1511:
1502:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1475:
1471:
1468:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1426:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1410:
1407:
1405:
1402:
1399:
1393:
1390:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1371:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1345:
1342:
1341:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1322:
1321:Only in death
1317:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1280:
1275:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1254:
1249:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1232:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1202:
1198:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1161:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1126:
1124:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1110:
1103:
1099:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1079:
1075:
1072:
1070:
1062:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1029:
1028:
1018:
1015:
1013:
1012:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
996:
988:
986:
983:
981:
980:
972:
968:
964:
958:
953:
951:
948:
946:
945:
937:
931:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
915:
914:
906:
903:
901:
900:
892:
888:
884:
878:
873:
872:
871:
868:
866:
865:
858:
854:
849:
845:
842:
841:
840:
828:
827:
824:
821:
820:
816:
811:
809:
806:
804:
800:
798:
792:
788:
784:
782:
776:
772:
768:
762:
757:
752:
747:
746:
745:
743:
737:
735:
731:
727:
723:
722:gamed the ban
719:
714:
712:
708:
704:
700:
695:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
665:
660:
655:
649:
646:
643:
640:
637:
634:
631:
628:
625:
622:
619:
616:
613:
610:
607:
602:
599:
597:
591:
588:
585:
582:
579:
576:
573:
570:
567:
564:
561:
558:
555:
552:
549:
544:
541:
540:
536:
531:
529:
527:
523:
519:
515:
506:
505:
500:
499:
494:
493:
488:
487:
478:
475:
474:
467:
464:
459:
456:
444:
439:
437:
432:
430:
425:
424:
422:
421:
416:
411:
410:
395:
394:
383:
380:
377:
373:
370:
368:
365:
364:
360:
355:
354:
346:
343:
341:
338:
335:
331:
326:
323:
321:
318:
315:
311:
308:
306:
303:
301:
298:
296:
293:
289:
284:
281:
280:
276:
271:
270:
262:
259:
257:
254:
251:
247:
244:
243:
239:
234:
233:
225:
222:
220:
217:
215:
212:
210:
209:Case requests
207:
205:
202:
201:
197:
192:
191:
184:
180:
177:
175:
172:
169:
165:
160:
158:
155:
153:
150:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:
129:
128:
124:
120:
119:
116:
112:
108:
105:
100:
96:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
69:
63:
58:
52:
47:
41:
36:
27:
23:
19:
2818:
2817:
2794:
2746:
2745:
2741:
2737:
2734:
2723:
2675:
2665:
2664:
2638:
2632:
2613:
2604:
2589:
2575:
2569:Magioladitis
2566:
2556:
2538:
2532:Magioladitis
2529:
2513:
2508:
2476:
2470:Magioladitis
2467:
2444:
2414:
2408:Magioladitis
2405:
2395:
2373:
2367:Magioladitis
2364:
2354:
2352:
2342:
2319:
2309:
2284:
2271:
2261:
2253:
2245:WP:CHECKWIKI
2237:CW Error #02
2233:CW Error #02
2225:WT:CHECKWIKI
2221:WP:CHECKWIKI
2218:
2213:
2209:
2195:
2177:
2167:
2162:
2131:
2121:
2100:
2085:
2079:
2064:
2054:
2046:
2037:
2027:
2017:
2009:
1992:
1982:
1976:
1953:
1943:
1932:
1920:
1913:
1900:
1890:
1884:18 June 2017
1876:
1862:
1849:
1840:
1833:
1820:
1805:
1794:
1770:
1760:
1750:
1744:Magioladitis
1741:
1726:
1720:
1710:
1691:
1675:
1671:
1663:
1661:
1651:
1641:
1631:
1613:
1603:
1597:
1587:
1581:
1571:
1561:
1551:
1541:
1531:
1525:
1507:
1506:
1479:
1466:
1455:
1438:
1423:
1420:
1408:
1391:
1368:
1353:WP:ADMINCOND
1349:WP:ADMINACCT
1343:
1208:Magioladitis
1203:
1179:
1177:
1108:
1105:
1101:
1080:
1068:
1061:Magioladitis
1048:
1039:WP:ADMINCOND
1035:Mendoza line
1030:
1007:
991:
975:
970:
962:
940:
935:
895:
890:
860:
857:WP:ADMINCOND
853:WP:ADMINACCT
847:
843:
836:
822:
807:
802:
801:
793:
789:
785:
777:
773:
769:
766:
750:
742:WP:ADMINCOND
738:
733:
715:
696:
669:
644:
638:
632:
626:
620:
614:
608:
601:Magioladitis
596:filing party
595:
586:
580:
574:
568:
562:
556:
550:
511:
503:
497:
491:
485:
470:
468:
462:
460:
454:
452:
94:
80:
79:
77:
34:
2823:, not here.
2692:("AN"); and
2624:Enforcement
2552:) account.
2514:Amended by
2251:?" is not.
2206:WP:GENFIXES
2154:also 15 Jun
2138:also 28 Feb
2075:tendentious
1852:22 May 2017
1664:substantive
1599:sanctions.
1484:Newyorkbrad
1397:Doug Weller
817:Clerk notes
699:bludgeoning
624:protections
566:protections
463:Case closed
455:Case opened
179:Ban appeals
157:Noticeboard
2805:Comments:
2667:Committee.
2596:Amendments
2389:remedy 7.1
2336:disruptive
2301:), he was
2180:discussion
2105:policy in
2071:disruptive
2040:discussion
1812:ISBN edits
1700:bot policy
1644:irrelevant
1617:bot policy
1517:Principles
1413:kelapstick
1361:Iridescent
1231:Hammersoft
877:Hammersoft
734:discussing
672:first case
636:page moves
578:page moves
385:(pre-2016)
372:Statistics
305:Procedures
85:Miniapolis
81:Case clerk
2705:arbcom-en
2488:WPCleaner
2278:Kingpin13
2020:indicated
1995:continued
1460:Cas Liber
1370:Callanecc
936:perfectly
630:deletions
572:deletions
310:Elections
99:Callanecc
2831:Category
2579:contribs
2542:contribs
2492:approved
2480:contribs
2418:contribs
2377:contribs
2349:Remedies
2288:contribs
2013:contribs
1917:contribs
1880:contribs
1870:PrimeBOT
1866:contribs
1837:contribs
1827:BU Rob13
1754:contribs
1672:cosmetic
1470:contribs
1379:contribs
1357:Hchc2009
1279:Beetstra
1253:Beetstra
1128:BU Rob13
1098:Beetstra
957:Beetstra
930:Beetstra
795:anyway:
730:claiming
726:creating
612:contribs
554:contribs
543:BU Rob13
57:Workshop
46:Evidence
24: |
22:Requests
20: |
2563:Desysop
2322:created
2229:WP:BOTN
2148:also),
1937:appears
1443:Keilana
1295:, then
1107:Events
1081:Comment
971:already
803:Comment
382:Reports
320:History
300:Members
295:Contact
283:Discuss
147:(CU/OS)
2697:"ARCA"
2616:motion
2516:motion
2274:warned
2214:single
2210:single
2158:20 Jun
2150:15 Jun
2142:12 Jun
2134:30 Dec
1968:raised
1956:raised
1619:and a
1480:accept
1456:Accept
1439:Accept
1421:Accept
1409:Accept
1392:Accept
1365:EdChem
1344:Accept
1331:(talk)
1310:(talk)
1268:(talk)
1260:WT:ACN
1242:(talk)
1216:(talk)
1210:soon.
1204:Accept
1184:WT:ACN
1180:accept
1069:Ks0stm
1049:Ks0stm
1031:Accept
883:WT:ACN
844:Accept
692:Ks0stm
642:rights
618:blocks
584:rights
560:blocks
473:motion
325:Clerks
183:Report
2406:2.1)
2365:1.1)
2144:(see
1999:asked
1966:also
1907:Yobot
1821:3) A
1677:Minor
1430:talk
1171:and
1132:added
1109:after
680:Yobot
498:Wshp.
486:Front
359:Audit
16:<
2573:talk
2536:talk
2474:talk
2412:talk
2371:talk
2332:game
2292:edit
2282:talk
2187:and
2146:this
2007:talk
1929:used
1911:talk
1874:talk
1860:talk
1841:bots
1831:talk
1748:talk
1704:BRFA
1702:and
1488:talk
1464:talk
1447:talk
1401:talk
1383:logs
1375:talk
1363:(in
1351:and
1192:talk
1154:talk
1140:talk
1118:talk
1089:talk
1010:Mkdw
994:Mkdw
978:Mkdw
963:this
943:Mkdw
898:Mkdw
863:Mkdw
855:and
848:some
718:here
690:and
688:Mkdw
606:talk
548:talk
376:Talk
367:Talk
334:Talk
314:Talk
168:Talk
138:Talk
104:Talk
90:Talk
73:Talk
62:Talk
51:Talk
40:Talk
26:Case
2530:4)
2484:AWB
2468:3)
2428:or
2276:by
2077:.
1958:by
1933:and
1921:and
1850:On
1693:AWB
1562:3)
1425:DGG
1102:not
891:not
751:all
724:by
648:RfA
590:RfA
504:PD.
492:Ev.
250:Log
2833::
2749::
2715:).
2585:.
2338:.
2305:.
2160:)
2156:,
2152:,
2136:,
2109:,
1974:.
1854:,
1847:.
1689:.
1674:.
1627:.
1490:)
1472:)
1449:)
1432:)
1411:--
1385:)
1381:•
1377:•
1291:.
1287::
1194:)
1156:)
1142:)
1120:)
1091:)
1045:.
859:.
594:,
528:.
501:,
495:,
489:,
97::
83::
66:—
55:—
44:—
2576:·
2571:(
2539:·
2534:(
2477:·
2472:(
2415:·
2410:(
2374:·
2369:(
2285:·
2280:(
2010:·
2005:(
1914:·
1909:(
1877:·
1872:(
1863:·
1858:(
1834:·
1829:(
1751:·
1746:(
1486:(
1467:·
1462:(
1445:(
1428:(
1373:(
1323::
1319:@
1281::
1277:@
1255::
1251:@
1233::
1229:@
1190:(
1152:(
1138:(
1116:(
1087:(
1063::
1059:@
959::
955:@
932::
928:@
879::
875:@
650:)
645:·
639:·
633:·
627:·
621:·
615:·
609:·
604:(
592:)
587:·
581:·
575:·
569:·
563:·
557:·
551:·
546:(
442:e
435:t
428:v
330:+
288:+
252:)
248:(
164:+
106:)
102:(
92:)
88:(
75:)
71:(
64:)
60:(
53:)
49:(
42:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
