1920:). This was not, as Edchem says, ‘after a suggestion by Brad’, but was entirely Ms. Arendt’s initiative. This was a provocative moment for undertaking such a contentious edit, which soon accumulated a deal of comment from editors, including Mr. Mabbett, much of it bilious on both sides (I do not except myself, who was feeling peeved, to say the least). Ms. Arendt then, quite charmingly (credit where credit is due!), on the morning of the bicentenary posted on the talk page a compendium of Wagner ‘Do You Knows’. I therefore archived the already extensive talkpage before this item (including the ‘infobox’ and discussion), to give Ms. Arendt’s more recent edit a decent airing to article visitors. Mr. Mabbett then unilaterally unarchived the talkpage and initiated an extensive squabble. His motivation seems inexplicable except in terms of a desire to agitate. By the way, at this time (and I believe still at the present) Mr. Mabbett was
1304:: I see the present "project specialties" in conflict with site consistency; restrictions seem to serve the interests of the writers more than the readers. Readers expect to see an infobox in the upper right corner. For most composers, they see only a picture (there are exceptions), for most operas, they see a sidebar navbox, which in cases of prolific composers such as Richard Wagner duplicates information that is also in the footer navbox, information which is the same for all his operas, nothing about the specific work. - Composer: I believe that an infobox doesn't "damage" an article (the term has been used). For composers with a wealth of information in a footer navbox, it could simply supply dates and locations of birth and death, to provide a quick information about historic and geographic context, - suggested for
1183:, it's a fair question, but I honestly don't know how to answer it. I don't like seeing people get blocked or banned from things they enjoy. I also like Andy, although I don't edit in the areas mentioned. My own personal choice is to grant preferences to any original and/or principle author when it comes to formatting and infoboxes. There's nothing in policy that says that, just my own choice. I don't know how to resolve the situation; which is why I am looking to the Arb committee to find a way forward here. I'm not trying to avoid your question, it's just that I really don't know a good answer. —
2241:
here by banning a couple of the worst offenders, but frankly, as MastCell points out, that's only going to fix the veneer. Right now, the only option I see having a decent chance of working is summary disposition of the matter by expedited case that would impose bans for past behavior without the usual process of determining who was the worst offender. It will be an unfair decision, but it might stop some of the bleeding. It's not going to solve the dispute, but neither would a motion admonishing people to behave better.
1909:
supposed necessity or inevitability of having infoboxes; dissenting opinions (e.g. those which query the actual value of an infobox) are ignored. This process is quite intimidating to editors who are not equipped to, or interested in, scoring points. Some, like me, sometimes admittedly foolishly, rise to the bait. But not all of us are, like Mr. Mabbett, actually employed as
Wikipedians in Residence and can devote all hours of the day to pursuing our pet crusades.
938:
be willing to look at a case. In particular I would ask that the committee view the thoughts of the people active in the classical music area as a beginning point. I understand that it is not within the committees remit to determine content, but rather to resolve disruption. Said disruption can easily be demonstrated in an evidence stage. I ask the committee to assist me in determining the scope and parties of this case. —
2621:. Because there is no project-wide policy governing when infoboxes should be used, disagreements concerning their inclusion arise with some regularity. These disagreements are sometimes resolved as they should be, through collegial discussion and consensus, but too often the consensus-building process has broken down, in a fashion that has been extremely demoralizing to many editors. Reasons for such breakdowns include:
136:
1904:. Their styles are different. Ms. Arendt makes, without consultation, edits and changes which she knows (by now) will be provocative and annoying to some editors, and then feigns hurt innocence and surprise in her responses. She is frequently then supported in her efforts by Mr. Mabbett, whose style is distinctly more nasty and brutal (but alas not short). When
1438:: Can you tell me how the Wagner discussion would have profited from Andy's absence? (Remember: it was NOT about an infobox for the article.) - Can you tell me where I or Andy or anybody else requested a mandatory infobox? - Can you show me one instance of "imposing infoboxes" in 2013? - Please read above what I said above about the heat in arguments. --
3224:
1229:'s request for brevity. However, almost every effort to actually use it is met with removal and time-consuming discussions, instead of showing it to our readers and let them participate in discussion and improvement. I was involved in creating the template and in inserting it. For an example, read talk (and history of article and talk) of
3290:
While asking the enforcing administrator and seeking reviews at AN or AE are not mandatory prior to seeking a decision from the committee, once the committee has reviewed a request, further substantive review at any forum is barred. The sole exception is editors under an active sanction who may still
3257:
Administrators are free to modify sanctions placed by former administrators – that is, editors who do not have the administrator permission enabled (due to a temporary or permanent relinquishment or desysop) – without regard to the requirements of this section. If an administrator modifies a sanction
3037:
3.2) Gerda Arendt is indefinitely restricted from: adding or deleting infoboxes; restoring an infobox that has been deleted; or making more than two comments in discussing the inclusion or exclusion of an infobox on a given article. They may participate in wider policy discussions regarding infoboxes
2631:
It is not clear to what degree, if any, the views of editors with a particular connection to an article (e.g., the editor who created the article or knowledgeable members of a relevant wikiproject) should be accorded any added weight in such discussions, nor is it clear how the potential desirability
1999:
I concur with those above saying there is no evidence that a case should be opened; but if there must be one, then Arbcom members are welcome to read the outcomes of the RfC called by members of the classical music project a while ago (also missing from
Kleinzach's list), not least "Infoboxes are not
1927:
Whilst there are issues of principle involved in this topic, I in fact believe that most discussions of infoboxes on pages could be dealt with on a case by case basis (or probably wouldn’t arise at all) if the few zealots who have provoked the issue into a major battlefield in the past could desist –
1908:
writes that ‘The editors involved are expert at being civil’, he is clearly not reading Mr. Mabbett’s threads. Quite often a bunch of usual suspects, like Mr.Mabbett unknown as music article editors, follow him into these frays, adopting the same egregious style. The ‘arguments’ normally turn on the
2456:
1) The purpose of
Knowledge (XXG) is to create a high-quality, free-content encyclopedia in an atmosphere of camaraderie and mutual respect among contributors. Anyone may edit, use, modify and distribute the content for any purpose and the re-use of the information should be facilitated, where it is
1341:"Ms. Arendt makes, without consultation, edits ..." - 1) everybody here can call me Gerda. 2) It reads as if I made those edits to articles. Composers: I did not add an infobox to a "controversial" composer. Opera: I didn't think infoboxes supported by the project would be considered "controversial".
937:
I don't really know how to do this, and I don't know who to name as parties to the case. Still, I think at least some of the committee members are aware of the issues involved with the infobox situations. There are multiple RfC discussion to link to, and many threads available should the committee
2134:
From reading too many ANI threads, I know all too well what the request is about. Awaiting further statements before voting. It would be helpful if statements could address, at least in general terms, how ArbCom might help resolve this longstanding problem if we accept the case (which based on how
1606:
is now on its last legs. There are only about a dozen active editors left from what was a dynamic, high quality project around 2007-2008. Launching an Rfc targeting classical music will present editors with the choice of participating in yet another gargantuan time sink or looking for the exit. If
2240:
I sympathize a lot with what has been said that there is a place for ArbCom to intervene here, but I also think that
Kleinzach is correct, this seems like it has the potential to drive off a lot of contributors for what I frankly do not see being a very good decision. We can implicitly take sides
1995:
If people are being bullied into having infoboxes, why do so many of the articles in
Kleinzach's list, or otherwise described as being the subject of contentious action, still not have them? (Note that he also lists three TfDs, describing one was "closed as keep". He's omitted to mention that the
1991:
The tone of debate offered by those opposed to the use of infoboxes (at all, or in specific areas) can be measured by the disingenuous and dishonest ad hominem comments made by some editors, above, and those calling for bans who have failed time and again to demonstrate community support for such
1895:
Over the past year or so in particular, a series of disputes has arisen concerning the adoption of infoboxes in articles relating to classical music. This appears to me to have been driven by two editors in particular; there has been, for example, no series of comments from
Knowledge (XXG) users
1632:) I hope uninvolved editors can read, or at least scan, some of the discussions in order to understand the issues. IMO they are significant and may well affect the future style, authority and accuracy of the encyclopaedia, as well as the continued involvement of many hitherto productive editors.
3298:
All actions designated as arbitration enforcement actions, including those alleged to be out of process or against existing policy, must first be appealed following arbitration enforcement procedures to establish if such enforcement is inappropriate before the action may be reversed or formally
3294:
These provisions apply only to contentious topics placed by administrators and to blocks placed by administrators to enforce arbitration case decisions. They do not apply to sanctions directly authorised by the committee, and enacted either by arbitrators or by arbitration clerks, or to special
1595:
Participants in the drafting also seem to be largely from the 'metapedian' camp. AFAIK none of the editors with reservations about the application of infoboxes, who have participated in previous debates and Rfcs, were invited to take part or found the draft. Nor are any of the 'moderates' — the
989:
To answer your question, the
Classical Music and Composers project feel that the infoboxes there are "counter-productive" to be used in articles without discussing it first on the talk page. To quote the Composers WikiProject's stance on biographical infoboxes, "We think it is normally best,
1596:
people who are broadly pro metadata but who recognise publishing issues — involved. So it seems more of a referendum, crafted to achieve a particular result, than a genuine Rfc. I think it would cause even more fighting, rather than lead to improved consensus. I hope it can be dropped.
1478:: Many good questions. I don't know if anybody noticed, but I started following a voluntary 1RR rule on opera infoboxes, although I think that these boxes - just introduced by the project - should be shown to the readers, not only talk page readers and article history readers. --
2206:
Awaiting more statements. What we need, and if the clerks and others can help construct this, it would be nice, is a list of the "actual" parties, as it can't be presumed that the notifications on the
Wikiproject talk pages will reach all, or even most, of those involved.
1583:
I recently discovered this draft Rfc and I have many concerns, not least that it specifically targets classical music editors. It seems to have been framed from the 'metapedian' point of view that community harmony, structural uniformity etc. are of overriding importance
1357:
I don't want to waste everybody's time by going into more detail, there would be much more. Andy is just back from hospital and can't respond as he would wish to do. If you allow me also a summary: I found his contributions in the discussions factual and to the point. He
2627:
It is not clear how infobox disputes are to be resolved (e.g. if 5 editors favor including an infobox in a given article and 5 disfavor it, there is no default rule and no policy guidance for determining how the consensus is to be determined, so the dispute continues
1460:. They are different from the ones you see. - Another user recently expressed his belief in the infobox having to summarize the article. Wrong. (The belief is wrong. The request would mean asking too much from the infobox.) It only has to sumarize key facts. --
3191:
Appeals may be made only by the editor under sanction and only for a currently active sanction. Requests for modification of page restrictions may be made by any editor. The process has three possible stages (see "Important notes" below). The editor may:
2182:
that are resulting in long-term problems, where there is reason to think we could help find a solution. This request very clearly falls into the latter category, and at least some of the parties think an arbitration decision might help. Given that
3258:
placed by a former administrator, the administrator who made the modification becomes the "enforcing administrator". If a former administrator regains the tools, the provisions of this section again apply to their unmodified enforcement actions.
3127:
6) The
Arbitration Committee recommends that a well-publicized community discussion be held to address whether to adopt a policy or guideline addressing what factors should weigh in favor of or against including an infobox in a given article.
2010:
I'm inclined to agree with Mark Arsten; a centralised RfC is the proper approach. For a year or more, I've been inviting those opposed to infoboxes to call one to demonstrate support for their claims of consensus, but they have never done so.
2596:
7) Where there is a global consensus to edit in a certain way, it should be respected and cannot be overruled by a local consensus. However, on subjects where there is no global consensus, a local consensus should be taken into account.
1916:. A couple of days before this was featured on the front page of WP (22 May 2013), Ms. Arendt, who knew that the article was going to be thus featured, chose to park a vast ‘sample’ Wagner infobox on the talkpage of the article. (See
1398:@Giano: the experience you describe, what date is it? I came late to the discussions, and - repeating - the contributions of Andy (whose surname is Mabbett) seemed much less "heated" than those of others, - please look yourself. Also
1210:
On top of what Orlady described above, the latest development (which possibly made uninvolved Ched post) goes even further than biographies of classical music composers and performers. Project opera developed an infobox for operas,
2653:
2) The use of infoboxes is neither required nor prohibited for any article by site policies or guidelines. Whether to include an infobox, which infobox to include, and which parts of the infobox to use, is determined through
1120:(now PumpkinSky), who I consider a VERY close friend. I've now asked the committee to look at this, and I am fully willing to answer any and all questions put to me. At this point I will allow the process to move forward. —
2531:, is prohibited. Making unsupported accusations of such misconduct by other editors, particularly where this is done in repeatedly or in a bad-faith attempt to gain an advantage in a content dispute, is also unacceptable.
990:
therefore, to avoid infoboxes altogether for classical musicians, and we prefer to add an infobox to an article only following consensus for that inclusion on the article's talk page. Particular care should be taken with
74:
3342:, an Infobox to any article she did not create, without first either a) obtaining a clear consensus to do so on the article talkpage, or b) her proposal on the article talk page attracting no comments for 72 hours.
2174:. A few months ago, I was asked my general philosophy of when this Committee should accept a request for arbitration. My response at the time was that we should often decline requests for arbitration that arise from
547:
to arbitrate this dispute, and serve as verbatim copies; as such, they should never be changed. (In the case of lengthy statements, an excerpt only may be given here, in which case the full copy will be added to the
3253:
Nothing in this section prevents an administrator from replacing an existing sanction issued by another administrator with a new sanction if fresh misconduct has taken place after the existing sanction was applied.
3181:
This procedure applies to appeals related to, and modifications of, actions taken by administrators to enforce the
Committee's remedies. It does not apply to appeals related to the remedies directly enacted by the
3291:
request an easing or removal of the sanction on the grounds that said sanction is no longer needed, but such requests may only be made once every six months, or whatever longer period the committee may specify.
3148:
0) Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked, initially for up to one month, and then with blocks increasing in duration to a maximum of one year.
2439:
564:
69:
805:
357:
3348:
IV) Gerda Arendt may be blocked for violation of parts II and III. Any such block shall cause remedy 3.2 to be unsuspended; if this is done, the blocking administrator must make the committee aware.
2720:(also known as Andy Mabbett) has had a long history of editing articles with the focus on adding or modifying infoboxes, and has been previously banned from editing the day's feature article (TFA)
63:
52:
2524:
3211:
575:
394:
226:
1921:
1653:
1643:
1588:
than the competing 'exopedian' view that we are trying to publish correct information and serve the reader. For example. the introductory section, 'Scope', doesn't even mention the encyclopedia.
1359:
915:
543:
Please do not edit this page unless you are an Arbitrator or Clerk, or are making yourself a party to this case. Statements on this page are copies of the statements submitted in the original
159:
3345:
III) During this six-month period, she must not, in the opinion of a consensus of administrators at the Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard, disrupt any discussion concerning infoboxes.
560:
553:
58:
47:
388:
3387:
3006:
2554:
process is designed to assist consensus-building when normal talk page communication has not worked. Sustained editorial conflict is not an appropriate method of resolving disputes.
1836:
1003:
999:
963:: I like infoboxes, so I do have a "side" that I favor. I will try to dig up some RfC diffs so that the Arbs can see that the community has tried to deal with this (and failed). —
1947:
a Wikipedian in Residence (in Burnley, and before that, elsewhere). I of course wish him better as an individual, whilst continuing to deprecate his aggression on Knowledge (XXG).--
1344:"... then feigns hurt innocence and surprise in her responses ..." - 1) I was honestly (!) surprised by some responses, I must say, and ask those who have no idea to actually read
3108:
5) All editors are reminded to maintain decorum and civility when engaged in discussions about infoboxes, and to avoid turning discussions about a single article's infobox into a
923:
I will pull some diffs from this page for the committee to review. I abandoned the page when I realized that the situation was bigger than I was able to handle on my own. (Ched)
2728:
1848:
1842:
1823:
995:
41:
2226:
This could fairly be called a "kitchen sink" dispute; everything has been tried, and it is still an ongoing issue, with no real conclusion in sight, save an arbitration case.
1363:
1159:: It should be noted that English is not the first language of Gerda. Gerda is from Germany, and I think it is important to note that "English" is not her native language, —
352:
2724:
1264:, we found an agreement during the last AN/I exchange, she respects my wish for an infobox in "my" articles, I respect her wish for no infobox in "her" articles, we created
384:
180:
172:
2003:
Proposals to give effective vetos to "primary authors" (how is that to be measured?) or to self-appointed projects are orthogonal to core Knowledge (XXG) values, not least
1352:
of those "discussions" and not go by a summary. 2) "innocence" implies that there is a guilt, - sorry, I don't feel "guilty" of suggesting an infobox on an article's talk.
2178:
that might otherwise be forgotten within a few days unless an arbitration case perpetuates them; but that we should be more willing to accept requests originating from
1607:
they are rational, they'll opt for the latter. Once again, I think it would be better not to proceed with this. It's simply the wrong approach. Thank you and regards.
552:—where any statements by uninvolved editors during the Requests phase will also be saved.) Any evidence you wish to provide to the Arbitrators should be added to the
326:
2089:
I haven't the slightest idea what this request is about; that said, Ched, since this is your first AR, you may ask a clerk for assistance to format it correctly.
346:
191:
169:
3311:
3200:
3155:
1705:
1695:
583:
379:
317:
236:
164:
2054:
The four-net-votes clock started at 19:53, 15 July 2013. Unless two or more arbitrators decline, this case is expected to be opened by 19:53, 16 July 2013. —
2984:
All remedies that refer to a period of time (for example, a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months) are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
2000:
to be added nor removed systematically from articles. Such actions would be considered disruptive.", and to determine who has, or has not, abided by them.
1234:
549:
322:
2691:
2274:, there's clearly a long history here and it does appear to have risen to the level of an intractable dispute which cannot been solved by the community.
1734:
679:
2573:. To facilitate access to this information, we should provide as few barriers to its use and dissemination as possible. Additional information, such as
332:
312:
195:
3204:
2865:
2507:
3) Knowledge (XXG) users are expected to behave reasonably, calmly, and courteously in their interactions with other users. Unseemly conduct, such as
727:
2489:
2419:
2393:
2366:
2344:
2315:
2291:
2256:
2211:
2144:
2099:
337:
250:
231:
453:
3374:
371:
262:
2789:
1966:
1226:
1145:
3405:
579:
295:
1006:
date way back to 2007. The following differences is a set of discussions on the use of the infoboxes from some of the WikiProjects in question:
2492:. Revert rules should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to revert, nor do they endorse reverts as an editing technique.
829:
544:
221:
150:
25:
3021:
2.1) For edit warring with Pigsonthewing, Nikkimaria is admonished to behave with the level of professionalism expected of an administrator.
1094:
2746:
4) Pigsonthewing's contributions to discussions about the inclusion of infoboxes are generally unhelpful and tend to inflame the situation.
2578:
3351:
V) If after six months Gerda Arendt has not been blocked under this motion, remedy 3.2 as well as this motion shall automatically lapse.
2933:
2685:
2027:
877:
673:
1238:
2859:
1237:. I actually don't know what ArbCom could do to stop this, in the interest of our readers. I made several attempts to seek agreement,
721:
1603:
657:
652:
287:
127:
3065:
3.3) Gerda Arendt is admonished for treating Knowledge (XXG) as if it were a battleground and advised to better conduct themselves.
1628:
For the record, I am placing here a list of box-related debates involving music that have occurred over the past six months or so. (
1276:
617:
273:
216:
21:
2783:
769:
563:. That page may also be used for general comments on the evidence. Arbitrators will then vote on a final decision in the case at
2635:
A small number of editors have repeatedly behaved poorly and in a polarizing fashion in infobox-related editing and discussions.
2508:
208:
3359:
3050:
1699:
823:
503:
2551:
2477:
258:
156:
2484:, and for helping the debate move to better approaches by discussing their differences rationally. Edit-warring, whether by
1917:
1785:
1345:
781:
2528:
2516:
268:
186:
799:
787:
2480:, rather than through disruptive editing. Editors are each responsible for noticing when a debate is escalating into an
3090:
2927:
1678:
871:
775:
446:
3373:
Any block, restriction, ban, or sanction performed under the authorisation of a remedy for this case must be logged at
1496:: I don't share your view that it is simple. Please give me one example of the behaviour problem you allude to in 2013.
2898:
2754:
2751:
2749:
2721:
2709:
1779:
1305:
793:
697:
574:
as needed, but the other content of this page should not be edited. Please raise any questions about this decision at
2617:
1.1) This case arises from a series of disputes concerning whether and when Knowledge (XXG) articles should include
3215:
2883:
2285:
1773:
1349:
1060:
1057:
1054:
745:
611:
307:
105:
3275:(i) the clear and substantial consensus of (a) uninvolved administrators at AE or (b) uninvolved editors at AN or
2697:
2547:
2187:
of discussion all over the wiki have not produced a community solution, I think it falls to us to take the case.
2122:
2097:
1804:
685:
3109:
1039:
411:
3246:
prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" below).
2871:
2830:
She has frequently sniped at Pigsonthewing and other editors she disagrees with in infobox-related discussions.
2807:
2488:
or otherwise, is prohibited; this is so even when the disputed content is clearly problematic, with only a few
2249:
1810:
1334:: I have high respect for you as an editor, author of FA Richard Wagner, and I thank you for a GA review of my
1316:
as it can be. In short: I would like to see restrictions go that prevent to consistently inform the readers. --
1283:
733:
2334:
to examine conduct of all involved, and perhaps to steer the actual meta-content dispute toward a resolution.
1457:
1112:
who has advised me as to possible "parties" to this case. Some of those people I do consider "wiki friends",
146:
17:
1674:
1572:
920:
2679:
2023:
1728:
1036:
1033:
1030:
1027:
1024:
847:
667:
439:
2994:
1.1) Pigsonthewing is indefinitely banned from adding, or discussing the addition or removal of, infoboxes.
2520:
1083:
1081:
1022:
1019:
1016:
1013:
1010:
1007:
2853:
2795:
2230:
2196:
2166:
2124:
2068:
2031:
1978:
1956:
1937:
1882:
1556:
1552:
1516:
1512:
1487:
1483:
1469:
1465:
1447:
1443:
1429:
1425:
1411:
1407:
1393:
1389:
1375:
1371:
1325:
1321:
1295:
1291:
1250:
1246:
1215:
1199:
1175:
1136:
1098:
979:
954:
715:
2655:
2485:
2473:
3250:
Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped.
2900:, including articles where she knew or should have known that adding an infobox would be controversial.
2275:
2192:
2162:
2140:
1767:
1761:
1644:
Bullying and ownership concerns at Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach and Sparrow Mass over the use of infoboxes
1265:
835:
116:
100:
2512:
2481:
1078:
1075:
1072:
1069:
1066:
1051:
1048:
1045:
559:
Arbitrators, the parties, and other editors may suggest proposed principles, findings, and remedies at
467:
1063:
1042:
2951:
2777:
2476:. This is done through the use of polite discussion—involving the wider community, if necessary—and
2117:
2092:
1109:
895:
763:
2618:
2570:
2363:
2242:
1924:. He has speciously (in my opinion) argued in his defence that the ban didn’t mention talk-pages.
1876:
1863:
1837:
Knowledge (XXG):Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_March_15#Template:Collapsed_infobox_section_begin
1798:
1751:
1614:
1500:
1301:
817:
2939:
2674:
2014:
1944:
1901:
1657:
1269:
1090:
883:
662:
635:
3339:
2723:
as well as sanctioned in Arbitration cases; he was banned for one year in 2006 by amendment to
994:
as these have been carefully crafted according to clear consensus on their talkpages. (See the
3335:
2848:
2412:
1897:
1755:
1718:
1548:
1508:
1504:
1493:
1479:
1461:
1439:
1421:
1403:
1385:
1367:
1317:
1287:
1242:
710:
3084:
2921:
2389:
2310:
2309:, it's clear this has not proceeded anywhere productive in the many months it has simmered.
2188:
2158:
2136:
2062:
1974:
1952:
1933:
1417:
865:
623:
413:
111:
91:
2004:
1896:
demanding that classical music articles must have infoboxes. The two editors concerned are
1843:
Knowledge (XXG):Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_June_5#Template:Infobox_Bruckner_symphony
3239:
No administrator may modify or remove a sanction placed by another administrator without:
2772:
2227:
2208:
1738:
1661:
1529:, won him back to the project, work with him and am proud to be considered helpful by him
1475:
1261:
758:
991:
416:
1913:
1871:
1858:
1630:
This list does not include similar discussions about the visual arts, architecture etc.
1609:
1526:
1192:
1168:
1129:
972:
947:
916:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive802#Persistent edit stalking
812:
605:
1849:
Knowledge (XXG):Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_June_5#Template:Infobox_musical_work
1420:: please give me one example of what you consider "disruptive behaviour" from 2013. --
3399:
2342:
1905:
1647:
1522:
1435:
1257:
1086:
415:
135:
3080:
2916:
2385:
2055:
1970:
1948:
1929:
1824:
Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Infoboxes/Archive_7#Collapsed_or_hidden_infoboxes
1381:
1331:
1313:
1117:
860:
86:
2632:
in uniformity of formatting across articles of a common type should be weighed.
2007:. Attempts to define a super-class of editors who are above others, likewise.
1002:.)" There were numerous discussions about these matters at these projects. The
3038:
with no restriction, and include infoboxes in new articles which they create.
2818:
has repeatedly edit warred to remove infoboxes without helpful edit summaries.
1722:
1453:
1338:(with an infobox). I have to correct some of your descriptions of my actions.
1230:
1547:
on his return, - if we had more of that attitude the "problem" was solved. --
1682:
1568:
1187:
1163:
1124:
967:
942:
600:
3281:
is required. If consensus at AE or AN is unclear, the status quo prevails.
1826:
protest against collapsing infoboxes started by Andy Mabbett, 6 March 2013
3243:
the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or
2574:
2335:
2442:, where comments and discussion from the voting phase is also available.
2078:
Infoboxes: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <7/0/2/1: -->
1335:
3196:
ask the enforcing administrator to reconsider their original decision;
1696:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Classical_music#Orchestra_infobox:_proposal
2048:
This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
1922:
under a ban from interfering with FAs when they are to be front-paged
1706:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Classical_music#Abbreviations_in_infoboxes
1309:
3214:. If the editor is blocked, the appeal may be made by email through
2753:
He also selectively chooses what discussions he considers consensus
2643:
Passed 7 to 1, with 2 abstentions at 00:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
3133:
Passed 7 to 1, with 1 abstention at 00:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
3098:
Passed 7 to 3, with 1 abstention at 00:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
3026:
Passed 6 to 3, with 1 abstention at 00:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
2837:
Passed 9 to 0, with 1 abstention at 00:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
2586:
Passed 5 to 4, with 1 abstention at 00:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
1507:". As one of them, I urge you to go beyond suspicion, to facts, --
1912:
To elaborate one recent example, already raised here by Edchem,
1625:
This is essentially my view of this Arbcom initiative as well.
1260:: you mentioned names, including mine. I have great respect for
576:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment
2135:
long this has been going on, I am tentatively inclined to do).
1366:. He is not employed as Wikipedians in Residence. What else? --
3312:
procedure for the standard appeals and modifications provision
1402:: even without him, you would still have to deal with me ;) --
417:
2074:
2577:, aligns with the goals of the encyclopedia where it is not
1839:
now closed as keep. nomination by Andy Mabbett 15 March 2013
1146:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost/2013-07-10/Dispatch
2411:
though I may well be inactive for key parts of this case,
2156:
I've made a trivial edit to the casename ("Infobox" --: -->
1892:
I see that my name has been invoked by the bemused Edchem.
1456:: The five arguments for infoboxes that I see are shown in
3388:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes/Review
3314:
adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
3158:
adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
2426:
2423:
2406:
2400:
2397:
2379:
2373:
2370:
2357:
2351:
2348:
2327:
2322:
2319:
2304:
2298:
2295:
2269:
2263:
2260:
2237:
2218:
2215:
2203:
2151:
2148:
2131:
2106:
2103:
2086:
2079:
2075:
1845:
proposed by Andy Mabbett 5 June 2013 (result:merge/delete)
571:
1928:
or be asked to desist – or perhaps even made to desist.--
2729:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Pigsonthewing 2
2571:
encyclopedia that can be modified and distributed freely
1805:
Talk:Don Carlos/Archive 1#Restoration_of_composer_navbox
1731:
Infobox discussion started by Andy Mabbett, 30 May 2013.
1503:: your wording "ban the worst offenders" reminds me of "
2967:
2965:
2963:
2957:
2945:
2895:
2889:
2877:
2831:
2828:
2827:
On two occasions the edit war led to her being blocked.
2825:
2823:
2821:
2819:
2813:
2801:
2747:
2715:
2703:
1811:
Talk:Rigoletto/Archive 1#Restoration_of_composer_navbox
1698:
new box proposed by Kleinzach, 16 March 2013 (see also
1544:
1540:
1536:
1533:
1530:
1399:
1222:
1151:
901:
889:
853:
841:
751:
739:
703:
691:
641:
629:
533:
527:
521:
515:
475:
427:
342:
300:
176:
2725:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Pigsonthewing
3093:) is reminded to conduct himself in a civil manner.
2894:
has added infoboxes to many articles systematically,
2080:-Preliminary_decision-2013-07-12T12:01:00.000Z": -->
2076:-Preliminary_decision-2013-07-12T12:01:00.000Z": -->
1851:
proposed by Andy Mabbett 5 June 2013 (result:delete)
3331:I) Remedy 3.2 of the Infoboxes case is suspended.
1114:
but if Iri does not object - then I will name them.
1788:‘no infobox’ proposal by Gerda Arendt, 16 May 2013
1996:other two were closed as delete. I wonder why?).
1108:: I have spoken via email with former Arb member
986:I am going to list some diffs that Sjones dug up:
3156:procedure for the standard enforcement provision
3117:Passed 10 to 0 at 00:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
2962:has degraded the quality of infobox discussions.
2761:Passed 10 to 0 at 00:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
2736:Passed 10 to 0 at 00:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
2663:Passed 10 to 0 at 00:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
1770:discussion started by Gerda Arendt, 5 March 2013
1268:together (no infobox). I have great respect for
584:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
570:Once the case is closed, editors may add to the
3070:Passed 6 to 1 at 00:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
3044:Passed 6 to 4 at 00:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
3000:Passed 7 to 3 at 00:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
2973:Passed 8 to 2 at 00:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
2905:Passed 9 to 1 at 00:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
2602:Passed 9 to 0 at 00:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
2559:Passed 9 to 0 at 00:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
2536:Passed 9 to 0 at 00:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
2497:Passed 9 to 0 at 00:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
2462:Passed 9 to 0 at 00:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
1807:discussion started by Robert.Allen, 7 July 2013
1782:infobox proposal by Gerda Arendt, 25 March 2013
1776:infobox proposal by Gerda Arendt, 21 March 2013
1764:: discussion started by Kleinzach, 4 March 2013
1635:
1116:I am also in frequent contact with former Arb
996:Request for Comment about composers' infoboxes
1801:discussion started by Kleinzach, 23 June 2013
1762:Talk:Enrique_Granados#Infobox_on_this_article
1206:Comment from Gerda Arendt (possibly involved)
447:
8:
3278:(ii) a passing motion of arbitrators at ARCA
2569:5) Knowledge (XXG)'s mission is to build an
1813:discussion started by Kleinzach, 7 July 2013
3375:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration enforcement log
2742:Pigsonthewing's contribution to discussions
2741:
1774:Talk:Johann_Sebastian_Bach#Infobox_proposal
1638:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (ANI)
1525:: Please note that I have high respect for
3168:
2656:discussion and consensus among the editors
2550:through the use of polite discussion. The
1735:Talk:Ihr werdet weinen und heulen, BWV 103
580:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Arbitration Committee
454:
440:
123:
1888:Comment from Smerus (apparently involved)
1786:Talk:Richard_Wagner/Archive_13#No_infobox
1943:I stand corrected by Gerda: Mr. Mabbett
1869:02:18, 13 July 2013 (UTC) List updated.
1780:Talk:George_Frideric_Handel#Mini-infobox
3216:Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee
2579:detrimental to our content or our scope
1987:Comment by Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing)
582:, and report violations of remedies to
126:
3295:functionary blocks of whatever nature.
2727:and for an additional year in 2007 in
1602:
1594:
1579:
572:#Log of blocks, bans, and restrictions
3368:Log of blocks, bans, and restrictions
3110:discussion about infoboxes in general
2546:4) Knowledge (XXG) works by building
2472:2) Knowledge (XXG) works by building
2457:not detrimental to the encyclopedia.
7:
3218:(or, if email access is revoked, to
1752:Talk:Robert_Stoepel#Infobox_proposal
227:Clarification and Amendment requests
3201:arbitration enforcement noticeboard
2438:All tallies are based the votes at
1282:, and we create articles together,
3210:submit a request for amendment at
2330:Sorry that I'm late to the party.
32:
3406:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration cases
1233:. For more examples, look at the
1225:on 18 June. It complies with the
496:on 00:20, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
3268:For a request to succeed, either
3222:
3123:Community discussion recommended
1364:is not banned from any talk page
134:
3340:except for the usual exemptions
3235:Modifications by administrators
1700:Template talk:Infobox orchestra
1737:Infobox discussion started by
1721:Infobox discussion started by
1:
3187:Appeals by sanctioned editors
2897:and without prior discussion.
2658:at each individual article.
1768:Talk:Peter_Planyavsky#Infobox
1575:and wrote to him as follows:
3173:0) Appeals and modifications
3053:at 20:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC).
3009:at 21:10, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
1831:Templates for deletion (TFD)
1679:User talk:Ched/RfC - Infobox
488:on 17:34, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
358:Conflict of interest reports
3362:at 20:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
3334:II) For a six-month period
3299:discussed at another venue.
3205:administrators’ noticeboard
3144:Enforcement of restrictions
2989:Pigsonthewing and infoboxes
1967:Of interest (and relevance)
1799:Talk:Joseph_(opera)#Infobox
1708:by Kleinzach, 23 April 2013
578:, any general questions at
507:on 20:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
187:Search archived proceedings
128:Knowledge (XXG) Arbitration
18:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration
3422:
2452:Purpose of Knowledge (XXG)
1360:did not breach a topic ban
513:Watchlist all case pages:
465:
232:Arbitrator motion requests
3223:
3164:Appeals and modifications
2421:06:00, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
2395:02:44, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
2368:01:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
2346:20:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
2317:02:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
2312:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
2293:15:12, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
2258:13:53, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
2231:23:10, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
2213:17:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
2197:19:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
2167:15:36, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
2146:14:34, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
2125:19:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
2101:12:01, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
2069:03:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
2032:16:06, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
1979:13:46, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
1957:09:25, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
1938:07:12, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
1883:03:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
1620:23:30, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
1557:07:30, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
1517:18:56, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
1505:arrest the usual suspects
1488:18:47, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
1470:18:40, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
1448:18:31, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
1430:18:04, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
1412:13:35, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
1394:09:09, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
1376:09:05, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
1326:08:18, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
1296:22:33, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
1251:15:03, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
1200:14:16, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
1176:23:36, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
1137:18:47, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
1099:04:01, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
980:17:51, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
955:07:23, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
3338:may not add or restore,
2517:assumptions of bad faith
1654:Persistent edit stalking
1277:infobox Bach composition
1235:list of open discussions
658:WP:WikiProject Infoboxes
653:WP:WikiProject Composers
3310:In accordance with the
3289:
3154:In accordance with the
3061:Gerda Arendt admonished
3032:Gerda Arendt restricted
2525:disruptive point-making
1945:has been until recently
1729:Talk:The Rite of Spring
1690:Classical Music Project
1675:User:Ched/RfC - Infobox
1581:Excuse me gatecrashing.
1362:. AN clarification: he
1000:earlier infobox debates
921:User:Ched/RfC - Infobox
3199:request review at the
1854:
1660:, 5 June 2013 against
1567:In June, I discovered
1541:asked about his health
1306:George Frideric Handel
928:Preliminary statements
3017:Nikkimaria admonished
1604:WikiProject Composers
1266:The Company of Heaven
428:Track related changes
288:Arbitration Committee
2037:Preliminary decision
1754:infobox proposal by
1713:Composition articles
1681:Rfc plan started by
1563:Comment by Kleinzach
1272:, he helped me with
1110:User talk:Iridescent
910:Requests for comment
237:Enforcement requests
165:Guide to arbitration
97:Drafting arbitrators
2592:Levels of consensus
1571:'s draft userspace
1537:asked Andy for help
1150:I replied to Giano
2552:dispute resolution
2478:dispute resolution
2440:/Proposed decision
2176:isolated incidents
1758:, 27 February 2013
1286:(with infobox)? --
565:/Proposed decision
259:Contentious topics
157:Arbitration policy
3358:Passed 7 to 0 by
3325:Motion (May 2015)
3305:
3304:
3203:("AE") or at the
2529:gaming the system
2468:Editorial process
2180:continuing issues
1746:Composer articles
1719:Talk:Sparrow Mass
1539:with an infobox,
1308:. Opera: compare
1198:
1174:
1135:
992:Featured Articles
978:
953:
933:Statement by Ched
540:
464:
463:
431:
399:
269:General sanctions
217:All open requests
147:About arbitration
120:
109:
95:
78:
70:Proposed decision
67:
56:
45:
3413:
3229:
3227:
3226:
3225:
3169:
3104:Editors reminded
2961:
2934:deleted contribs
2893:
2866:deleted contribs
2817:
2790:deleted contribs
2719:
2692:deleted contribs
2649:Use of infoboxes
2613:Locus of dispute
2608:Findings of fact
2509:personal attacks
2428:
2425:
2417:
2408:
2402:
2399:
2381:
2375:
2372:
2359:
2353:
2350:
2340:
2329:
2324:
2321:
2313:
2306:
2300:
2297:
2288:
2282:
2271:
2265:
2262:
2252:
2239:
2220:
2217:
2205:
2153:
2150:
2133:
2121:
2108:
2105:
2096:
2088:
2081:
2077:
2066:
2060:
2030:
2021:
2017:
1879:
1874:
1866:
1861:
1725:, 30 March 2013.
1617:
1612:
1281:
1275:
1227:Signpost article
1223:added to the MOS
1220:
1214:
1197:
1195:
1184:
1173:
1171:
1160:
1134:
1132:
1121:
977:
975:
964:
952:
950:
939:
905:
878:deleted contribs
857:
830:deleted contribs
809:
755:
728:deleted contribs
707:
680:deleted contribs
645:
618:deleted contribs
595:Involved parties
590:Case information
539:
538:
511:
502:Case amended by
478:
456:
449:
442:
430:
425:
418:
397:
353:Clerk procedures
345:
303:
274:Editor sanctions
251:Active sanctions
209:Open proceedings
179:
138:
124:
114:
103:
101:Worm That Turned
89:
72:
61:
50:
39:
3421:
3420:
3416:
3415:
3414:
3412:
3411:
3410:
3396:
3395:
3384:
3370:
3354:
3353:
3327:
3322:
3306:
3262:Important notes
3221:
3219:
3174:
3166:
3146:
3141:
3125:
3106:
3078:
3076:Smerus reminded
3063:
3034:
3019:
2991:
2981:
2919:
2913:
2851:
2845:
2775:
2769:
2744:
2677:
2671:
2651:
2615:
2610:
2594:
2567:
2544:
2505:
2470:
2454:
2449:
2435:
2413:
2336:
2311:
2286:
2276:
2250:
2115:
2090:
2083:
2063:
2056:
2044:
2039:
2019:
2013:
2012:
1989:
1890:
1877:
1872:
1864:
1859:
1855:
1615:
1610:
1565:
1279:
1273:
1218:
1212:
1208:
1193:
1185:
1169:
1161:
1130:
1122:
1004:infobox debates
973:
965:
948:
940:
935:
930:
912:
863:
815:
761:
713:
665:
603:
597:
592:
541:
514:
512:
508:
497:
489:
482:
481:
474:
470:
460:
426:
420:
419:
414:
404:
403:
402:
391:
374:
364:
363:
362:
349:
341:
329:
304:
299:
290:
280:
279:
278:
253:
243:
242:
241:
211:
201:
198:
183:
175:
153:
122:
30:
29:
28:
12:
11:
5:
3419:
3417:
3409:
3408:
3398:
3397:
3393:
3391:
3390:
3383:
3380:
3369:
3366:
3365:
3364:
3329:
3328:
3326:
3323:
3321:
3318:
3317:
3316:
3303:
3302:
3301:
3300:
3296:
3292:
3288:
3285:
3284:
3283:
3282:
3279:
3276:
3270:
3269:
3248:
3247:
3244:
3237:
3236:
3232:
3231:
3208:
3197:
3189:
3188:
3176:
3175:
3172:
3167:
3165:
3162:
3161:
3160:
3145:
3142:
3140:
3137:
3136:
3135:
3124:
3121:
3120:
3119:
3105:
3102:
3101:
3100:
3077:
3074:
3073:
3072:
3062:
3059:
3058:
3057:
3056:
3055:
3049:Superseded by
3033:
3030:
3029:
3028:
3018:
3015:
3014:
3013:
3012:
3011:
2990:
2987:
2980:
2977:
2976:
2975:
2912:
2909:
2908:
2907:
2844:
2841:
2840:
2839:
2768:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2743:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2670:
2667:
2666:
2665:
2650:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2636:
2633:
2629:
2628:indefinitely).
2614:
2611:
2609:
2606:
2605:
2604:
2593:
2590:
2589:
2588:
2566:
2563:
2562:
2561:
2543:
2540:
2539:
2538:
2504:
2501:
2500:
2499:
2469:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2453:
2450:
2448:
2445:
2434:
2433:Final decision
2431:
2430:
2429:
2403:
2376:
2354:
2325:
2301:
2266:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2201:
2200:
2199:
2169:
2157:"Infoboxes").
2129:
2128:
2127:
2082:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2051:
2050:
2043:
2040:
2038:
2035:
1992:calls at ANI.
1988:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1960:
1959:
1914:Richard Wagner
1889:
1886:
1853:
1852:
1846:
1840:
1828:
1827:
1815:
1814:
1808:
1802:
1793:Opera articles
1790:
1789:
1783:
1777:
1771:
1765:
1759:
1743:
1742:
1732:
1726:
1710:
1709:
1703:
1687:
1686:
1685:, 5 April 2013
1666:
1665:
1651:
1650:, 2 April 2013
1634:
1623:
1622:
1599:
1598:
1591:
1590:
1564:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1519:
1497:
1490:
1472:
1450:
1432:
1414:
1396:
1378:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1342:
1328:
1302:Toccata quarta
1298:
1207:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1178:
1154:
1148:
1139:
1102:
1101:
1021:(scroll down)
987:
983:
982:
934:
931:
929:
926:
925:
924:
918:
911:
908:
907:
906:
858:
810:
756:
708:
660:
655:
650:
596:
593:
591:
588:
510:
500:
492:
484:
480:
479:
471:
466:
462:
461:
459:
458:
451:
444:
436:
433:
432:
422:
421:
412:
410:
409:
406:
405:
401:
400:
392:
387:
382:
376:
375:
370:
369:
366:
365:
361:
360:
355:
350:
340:
335:
330:
325:
320:
315:
310:
305:
298:
292:
291:
286:
285:
282:
281:
277:
276:
271:
266:
255:
254:
249:
248:
245:
244:
240:
239:
234:
229:
224:
219:
213:
212:
207:
206:
203:
202:
200:
199:
194:
189:
184:
174:
167:
162:
154:
149:
143:
140:
139:
131:
130:
37:Main case page
35:
31:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3418:
3407:
3404:
3403:
3401:
3394:
3389:
3386:
3385:
3381:
3379:
3378:
3376:
3367:
3363:
3361:
3356:
3355:
3352:
3349:
3346:
3343:
3341:
3337:
3332:
3324:
3319:
3315:
3313:
3308:
3307:
3297:
3293:
3287:
3286:
3280:
3277:
3274:
3273:
3272:
3271:
3267:
3266:
3265:
3263:
3259:
3255:
3251:
3245:
3242:
3241:
3240:
3234:
3233:
3228:wikimedia.org
3217:
3213:
3209:
3206:
3202:
3198:
3195:
3194:
3193:
3186:
3185:
3184:
3183:
3178:
3177:
3171:
3170:
3163:
3159:
3157:
3152:
3151:
3150:
3143:
3138:
3134:
3131:
3130:
3129:
3122:
3118:
3115:
3114:
3113:
3111:
3103:
3099:
3096:
3095:
3094:
3092:
3089:
3086:
3082:
3075:
3071:
3068:
3067:
3066:
3060:
3054:
3052:
3047:
3046:
3045:
3042:
3041:
3040:
3039:
3031:
3027:
3024:
3023:
3022:
3016:
3010:
3008:
3005:Rescinded on
3003:
3002:
3001:
2998:
2997:
2996:
2995:
2988:
2986:
2985:
2978:
2974:
2971:
2970:
2969:
2968:
2966:
2964:
2959:
2956:
2953:
2950:
2947:
2944:
2941:
2938:
2935:
2932:
2929:
2926:
2923:
2918:
2910:
2906:
2903:
2902:
2901:
2899:
2896:
2891:
2888:
2885:
2882:
2879:
2876:
2873:
2870:
2867:
2864:
2861:
2858:
2855:
2850:
2842:
2838:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2832:
2829:
2826:
2824:
2822:
2820:
2815:
2812:
2809:
2806:
2803:
2800:
2797:
2794:
2791:
2788:
2785:
2782:
2779:
2774:
2766:
2762:
2759:
2758:
2757:
2755:
2752:
2750:
2748:
2737:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2730:
2726:
2722:
2717:
2714:
2711:
2708:
2705:
2702:
2699:
2696:
2693:
2690:
2687:
2684:
2681:
2676:
2675:Pigsonthewing
2669:Pigsonthewing
2668:
2664:
2661:
2660:
2659:
2657:
2648:
2644:
2641:
2640:
2634:
2630:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2622:
2620:
2612:
2607:
2603:
2600:
2599:
2598:
2591:
2587:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2580:
2576:
2572:
2564:
2560:
2557:
2556:
2555:
2553:
2549:
2541:
2537:
2534:
2533:
2532:
2530:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2514:
2510:
2502:
2498:
2495:
2494:
2493:
2491:
2487:
2483:
2479:
2475:
2467:
2463:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2451:
2446:
2444:
2443:
2441:
2432:
2422:
2418:
2416:
2410:
2404:
2396:
2391:
2387:
2383:
2377:
2369:
2365:
2361:
2355:
2347:
2343:
2341:
2339:
2333:
2326:
2318:
2314:
2308:
2302:
2294:
2289:
2283:
2281:
2280:
2273:
2267:
2259:
2255:
2253:
2246:
2245:
2236:
2232:
2229:
2225:
2222:
2221:
2214:
2210:
2202:
2198:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2181:
2177:
2173:
2170:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2155:
2154:
2147:
2142:
2138:
2130:
2126:
2123:
2120:
2119:
2113:
2110:
2109:
2102:
2098:
2095:
2094:
2085:
2084:
2070:
2067:
2065:
2061:
2059:
2053:
2052:
2049:
2046:
2045:
2041:
2036:
2034:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2020:Pigsonthewing
2016:
2008:
2006:
2001:
1997:
1993:
1986:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1925:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1910:
1907:
1906:User:Johnuniq
1903:
1899:
1893:
1887:
1885:
1884:
1881:
1880:
1875:
1868:
1867:
1862:
1850:
1847:
1844:
1841:
1838:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1825:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1812:
1809:
1806:
1803:
1800:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1787:
1784:
1781:
1778:
1775:
1772:
1769:
1766:
1763:
1760:
1757:
1753:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1740:
1736:
1733:
1730:
1727:
1724:
1720:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1707:
1704:
1701:
1697:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1652:
1649:
1645:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1633:
1631:
1626:
1621:
1619:
1618:
1613:
1605:
1601:
1600:
1597:
1593:
1592:
1589:
1587:
1582:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1574:
1573:RfC - Infobox
1570:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1531:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1495:
1491:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1458:my link above
1455:
1451:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1356:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1340:
1339:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1278:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1217:
1216:infobox opera
1205:
1201:
1196:
1190:
1189:
1182:
1179:
1177:
1172:
1166:
1165:
1158:
1155:
1153:
1149:
1147:
1143:
1140:
1138:
1133:
1127:
1126:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1104:
1103:
1100:
1096:
1095:contributions
1092:
1088:
1087:Lord Sjones23
1084:
1082:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1070:
1067:
1064:
1061:
1058:
1055:
1052:
1049:
1046:
1043:
1040:
1037:
1034:
1031:
1028:
1025:
1023:
1020:
1017:
1014:
1011:
1008:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
988:
985:
984:
981:
976:
970:
969:
962:
959:
958:
957:
956:
951:
945:
944:
932:
927:
922:
919:
917:
914:
913:
909:
903:
900:
897:
894:
891:
888:
885:
882:
879:
876:
873:
870:
867:
862:
859:
855:
852:
849:
846:
843:
840:
837:
834:
831:
828:
825:
822:
819:
814:
811:
807:
804:
801:
798:
795:
792:
789:
786:
783:
780:
777:
774:
771:
768:
765:
760:
757:
753:
750:
747:
744:
741:
738:
735:
732:
729:
726:
723:
720:
717:
712:
709:
705:
702:
699:
696:
693:
690:
687:
684:
681:
678:
675:
672:
669:
664:
663:Pigsonthewing
661:
659:
656:
654:
651:
649:
643:
640:
637:
634:
631:
628:
625:
622:
619:
616:
613:
610:
607:
602:
599:
598:
594:
589:
587:
585:
581:
577:
573:
568:
566:
562:
557:
555:
551:
546:
537:
536:
531:
530:
525:
524:
519:
518:
509:
506:
505:
498:
495:
490:
487:
477:
476:WP:ARBINFOBOX
473:
472:
469:
457:
452:
450:
445:
443:
438:
437:
435:
434:
429:
424:
423:
408:
407:
396:
393:
390:
386:
383:
381:
378:
377:
373:
368:
367:
359:
356:
354:
351:
348:
344:
339:
336:
334:
331:
328:
324:
321:
319:
316:
314:
311:
309:
306:
302:
297:
294:
293:
289:
284:
283:
275:
272:
270:
267:
264:
260:
257:
256:
252:
247:
246:
238:
235:
233:
230:
228:
225:
223:
222:Case requests
220:
218:
215:
214:
210:
205:
204:
197:
193:
190:
188:
185:
182:
178:
173:
171:
168:
166:
163:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:
142:
141:
137:
133:
132:
129:
125:
121:
118:
113:
107:
102:
98:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
71:
65:
60:
54:
49:
43:
38:
34:
27:
23:
19:
3392:
3372:
3371:
3357:
3350:
3347:
3344:
3336:Gerda Arendt
3333:
3330:
3309:
3261:
3260:
3256:
3252:
3249:
3238:
3190:
3180:
3179:
3153:
3147:
3132:
3126:
3116:
3107:
3097:
3087:
3079:
3069:
3064:
3048:
3043:
3036:
3035:
3025:
3020:
3004:
2999:
2993:
2992:
2983:
2982:
2972:
2954:
2948:
2942:
2936:
2930:
2924:
2914:
2904:
2886:
2880:
2874:
2868:
2862:
2856:
2849:Gerda Arendt
2846:
2843:Gerda Arendt
2836:
2810:
2804:
2798:
2792:
2786:
2780:
2770:
2760:
2745:
2735:
2712:
2706:
2700:
2694:
2688:
2682:
2672:
2662:
2652:
2642:
2616:
2601:
2595:
2585:
2568:
2558:
2545:
2535:
2506:
2496:
2471:
2461:
2455:
2437:
2436:
2415:Roger Davies
2414:
2405:
2378:
2356:
2337:
2331:
2303:
2278:
2277:
2268:
2247:
2243:
2223:
2184:
2179:
2175:
2171:
2116:
2111:
2091:
2064:
2057:
2047:
2028:Andy's edits
2024:Talk to Andy
2015:Andy Mabbett
2009:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1926:
1911:
1902:Andy Mabbett
1898:Gerda Arendt
1894:
1891:
1870:
1857:
1856:
1830:
1829:
1817:
1816:
1792:
1791:
1756:Gerda Arendt
1745:
1744:
1712:
1711:
1689:
1688:
1668:
1667:
1658:Andy Mabbett
1637:
1636:
1629:
1627:
1624:
1608:
1585:
1580:
1566:
1549:Gerda Arendt
1509:Gerda Arendt
1494:Anthonyhcole
1480:Gerda Arendt
1462:Gerda Arendt
1440:Gerda Arendt
1422:Gerda Arendt
1404:Gerda Arendt
1386:Gerda Arendt
1384:thank you --
1368:Gerda Arendt
1318:Gerda Arendt
1312:as it is to
1288:Gerda Arendt
1284:did you know
1243:Gerda Arendt
1209:
1186:
1180:
1162:
1156:
1141:
1123:
1113:
1105:
966:
960:
941:
936:
898:
892:
886:
880:
874:
868:
850:
844:
838:
832:
826:
820:
802:
796:
790:
784:
778:
772:
766:
748:
742:
736:
730:
724:
718:
711:Gerda Arendt
700:
694:
688:
682:
676:
670:
648:filing party
647:
638:
632:
626:
620:
614:
608:
569:
558:
542:
534:
528:
522:
516:
501:
499:
493:
491:
485:
483:
96:
82:
81:
79:
36:
33:
3382:Review case
3377:, not here.
3207:("AN"); and
3139:Enforcement
2189:Newyorkbrad
2159:Newyorkbrad
2137:Newyorkbrad
2042:Clerk notes
1545:greeted him
1418:Laser brain
1157:at everyone
1118:User:Rlevse
782:protections
494:Case Closed
486:Case Opened
192:Ban appeals
170:Noticeboard
112:David Fuchs
3320:Amendments
3182:Committee.
2952:block user
2946:filter log
2884:block user
2878:filter log
2808:block user
2802:filter log
2773:Nikkimaria
2767:Nikkimaria
2710:block user
2704:filter log
2521:harassment
2513:incivility
2490:exceptions
2447:Principles
2228:Courcelles
2209:Courcelles
1739:Nikkimaria
1669:User pages
1662:Nikkimaria
1656:Report by
1646:Report by
1476:SPhilbrick
1262:Nikkimaria
1231:Don Carlos
961:disclaimer
896:block user
890:filter log
848:block user
842:filter log
794:page moves
759:Nikkimaria
746:block user
740:filter log
698:block user
692:filter log
636:block user
630:filter log
398:(pre-2016)
385:Statistics
318:Procedures
83:Case clerk
3220:arbcom-en
2958:block log
2890:block log
2814:block log
2716:block log
2619:infoboxes
2548:consensus
2542:Consensus
2486:reversion
2474:consensus
1527:Tim riley
1400:repeating
1239:last here
1142:reference
902:block log
854:block log
813:Kleinzach
788:deletions
752:block log
704:block log
642:block log
561:/Workshop
556:subpage.
554:/Evidence
550:talk page
323:Elections
3400:Category
3091:contribs
2979:Remedies
2928:contribs
2860:contribs
2784:contribs
2686:contribs
2575:metadata
2482:edit war
1648:Jusdafax
1523:Sjones23
1436:Folantin
1258:Resolute
872:contribs
824:contribs
770:contribs
722:contribs
674:contribs
612:contribs
468:Shortcut
59:Workshop
48:Evidence
24: |
22:Requests
20: |
2565:Mission
2503:Decorum
1965:@ all:
1336:BWV 103
1181:@ Giano
1106:further
545:request
395:Reports
333:History
313:Members
308:Contact
296:Discuss
160:(CU/OS)
3360:motion
3212:"ARCA"
3081:Smerus
3051:motion
3007:review
2917:Smerus
2911:Smerus
2527:, and
2427:": -->
2424:": -->
2420:": -->
2409:Accept
2407:": -->
2401:": -->
2398:": -->
2394:": -->
2386:Risker
2382:Recuse
2380:": -->
2374:": -->
2371:": -->
2367:": -->
2364:Kirill
2360:Recuse
2358:": -->
2352:": -->
2349:": -->
2345:": -->
2332:Accept
2328:": -->
2323:": -->
2320:": -->
2316:": -->
2307:Accept
2305:": -->
2299:": -->
2296:": -->
2292:": -->
2272:Accept
2270:": -->
2264:": -->
2261:": -->
2257:": -->
2238:": -->
2224:Accept
2219:": -->
2216:": -->
2212:": -->
2204:": -->
2172:Accept
2152:": -->
2149:": -->
2145:": -->
2132:": -->
2118:Salvio
2112:Accept
2107:": -->
2104:": -->
2100:": -->
2093:Salvio
2087:": -->
2005:WP:OWN
1971:Smerus
1949:Smerus
1930:Smerus
1741:27 May
1586:rather
1535:. Tim
1382:EdChem
1332:Smerus
1314:Carmen
1310:Carmen
861:Smerus
800:rights
776:blocks
504:motion
338:Clerks
196:Report
110:&
87:Hahc21
2185:years
1873:Klein
1860:Klein
1723:RexxS
1611:Klein
1454:Ewulp
372:Audit
16:<
3085:talk
2940:logs
2922:talk
2872:logs
2854:talk
2796:logs
2778:talk
2698:logs
2680:talk
2390:talk
2287:talk
2279:Worm
2251:Talk
2193:talk
2163:talk
2141:talk
1975:talk
1953:talk
1934:talk
1918:here
1900:and
1878:zach
1865:zach
1683:Ched
1677:and
1616:zach
1569:Ched
1553:talk
1543:and
1513:talk
1484:talk
1466:talk
1444:talk
1426:talk
1408:talk
1390:talk
1372:talk
1322:talk
1292:talk
1270:Andy
1247:talk
1241:. --
1188:Ched
1164:Ched
1152:here
1125:Ched
1091:talk
998:and
968:Ched
943:Ched
884:logs
866:talk
836:logs
818:talk
764:talk
734:logs
716:talk
686:logs
668:talk
624:logs
606:talk
601:Ched
389:Talk
380:Talk
347:Talk
327:Talk
181:Talk
151:Talk
117:Talk
106:Talk
92:Talk
75:Talk
64:Talk
53:Talk
42:Talk
26:Case
2915:7)
2847:6)
2771:5)
2673:3)
2338:AGK
2058:ΛΧΣ
2022:);
1969:.--
1818:MOS
1350:two
1348:or
1346:one
806:RfA
263:Log
3402::
3264::
3230:).
3112:.
2756:.
2731:.
2581:.
2523:,
2519:,
2515:,
2511:,
2392:)
2384:.
2362:.
2290:)
2244:NW
2195:)
2165:)
2143:)
2114:.
2026:;
1977:)
1955:)
1936:)
1555:)
1532:,
1515:)
1501:NW
1486:)
1468:)
1446:)
1428:)
1410:)
1392:)
1374:)
1324:)
1294:)
1280:}}
1274:{{
1249:)
1221:,
1219:}}
1213:{{
1194:?
1191::
1170:?
1167::
1144::
1131:?
1128::
1097:)
1093:-
1085:.
1080:,
1077:,
1074:,
1071:,
1068:,
1065:,
1062:,
1059:,
1056:,
1053:,
1050:,
1047:,
1044:,
1041:,
1038:,
1035:,
1029:,
1026:,
1018:,
1015:,
1012:,
1009:,
974:?
971::
949:?
946::
646:,
586:.
567:.
532:,
526:,
520:,
99::
85::
68:—
57:—
46:—
3088:·
3083:(
2960:)
2955:·
2949:·
2943:·
2937:·
2931:·
2925:·
2920:(
2892:)
2887:·
2881:·
2875:·
2869:·
2863:·
2857:·
2852:(
2816:)
2811:·
2805:·
2799:·
2793:·
2787:·
2781:·
2776:(
2718:)
2713:·
2707:·
2701:·
2695:·
2689:·
2683:·
2678:(
2388:(
2284:(
2254:)
2248:(
2191:(
2161:(
2139:(
2018:(
1973:(
1951:(
1932:(
1702:)
1664:.
1551:(
1521:@
1511:(
1499:@
1492:@
1482:(
1474:@
1464:(
1452:@
1442:(
1434:@
1424:(
1416:@
1406:(
1388:(
1380:@
1370:(
1330:@
1320:(
1300:@
1290:(
1256:@
1245:(
1089:(
1032:,
904:)
899:·
893:·
887:·
881:·
875:·
869:·
864:(
856:)
851:·
845:·
839:·
833:·
827:·
821:·
816:(
808:)
803:·
797:·
791:·
785:·
779:·
773:·
767:·
762:(
754:)
749:·
743:·
737:·
731:·
725:·
719:·
714:(
706:)
701:·
695:·
689:·
683:·
677:·
671:·
666:(
644:)
639:·
633:·
627:·
621:·
615:·
609:·
604:(
535:4
529:3
523:2
517:1
455:e
448:t
441:v
343:+
301:+
265:)
261:(
177:+
119:)
115:(
108:)
104:(
94:)
90:(
77:)
73:(
66:)
62:(
55:)
51:(
44:)
40:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
