Knowledge

:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Senkaku Islands/Evidence - Knowledge

Source 📝

3087:. One would assume the persons filing the RFC, Bob thefish and Qwyrxian, would be the ones to answer these questions, which were designed to help Tenmei understand what he had specifically done wrong and how to avoid repeating his mistakes. At the time the questions were posted, neither of them had edited the RFC in ten days. Neither of them offered any answers to those questions or in fact ever edited the RFC again. After 23 days of no edits by anyone besides Tenmei, I elected to close the RFC, as it seemed clear that the filing parties had given up on trying to come to any voluntary decision. 1130:. That dispute eventually faded away because, I suspect, the involved editors found better things to do. I believe one or two of the more troublesome editors were banned for edit warring, which probably helped out a lot. Nevertheless, in this case, I suggest flushing out the editors who are fighting a little too hard over the article's content, so that editors who don't have as emotional a stake in the outcome can help shape the article into a stable, reasonably NPOV version. 2158: 597:
articles; this really serves as proof that SI isn't exactly an NPOV name either. That's exactly why I've been asking the question "Can we use the same compromise as in Liancourt Rocks; i.e. find a neutral, English name?" I know that the situation may be different, but it serves as a good place to start. Also, another point: we may need clarification on how to work the naming conventions within policy, which I hope the arbitrators will take a look at.
504:; posting evidence longer than 500 words will not help you make your point. Over-long evidence that is not exceptionally easy to understand (like tables) will be trimmed to size or, in extreme cases, simply removed by the Clerks without warning - this could result in your important points being lost, so don't let it happen. Stay focused on the issues raised in the initial statements and on diffs which illustrate relevant behavior. 1548:. Qwyrxian also joined in to game the system in Tenmei's favour. He argued Tenmei shouldn’t be blocked because the latter declared a wiki-break and that blocks should not be used as punishment. I argued the block should be enforced to avoid systems to be gamed and to serve as a preventative measure. This matter was eventually closed because it was going nowhere. Shortly after, Tenmei immediately cancelled wiki-break 138: 473: 1541:. Lvhis and I politely debated Magog’s decision and Tenmei declared wiki-break in the midst of that. After a few exchanges, Magog said I was "getting on his nerves". After further providing arguments regarding his mistakes, he closed topic and implied I had sinister agenda he could not fulfill. I brought the problem over to 2349:. Senkaku Shoto is the BGN's approved name too. I don't understand why they deny SI only nor why they keep on saying SI should be moved to the least common, almost obsolete name. Probably because of "any name but Senkaku". In other WPs, PI is used only in Tagalog and all the other WPs use Senkaku except Chinese languages. 1032:, I also believe that this full protection is like another unbalanced enforcement of rules because now only one user (Tenmei) had violated the rule and the admin would have only needed to block this user alone but no need to prevent all other innocent users from editing the page by faithfully obeying the sanction. -- 2381:
be removed after mediation. He seems to want the article permanently tagged until the title is changed. He has also created edit wars by repeatedly reinserting a NPOV tag. He keeps claiming that removing the NPOV tag will start an edit war, yet he himself is largely to blame for edit warring by reinserting it
1519:
consisted of rants about political correctness and racism, insults of other people ("allegedly-smart", "trolling"), and some admissions regarding how he wouldn't have reacted in such a way had the subject been a different person (i.e. not me). He later refused to apologize/discuss the matter, claimed
1258:
Tenmei's behavior in Arbitration so far exemplifies the problems xe has in the SI articles. Tenmei's writing style is obscure and filled with links to quotations and cliches, "dispute resolution tables", and graphics that don't help the process. Furthermore, as xe did on the Proposals page, xe often
596:
Yes, I might have a Chinese bias, but I do not think this article belongs at the name Diaoyu(tai) (Islands) because we'd have the same exact argument like the one we are having right now. Like I've said on the article talk page - media outlets have tried to avoid this argument by naming both names in
1304:
Tenmei's inability to express xyrself in simple, concise ways is disruptive, because it compels editors who care to spend an inordinate amount of time deciphering his message. Sometimes these long messages come off as attacking and uncivil. Tenmei has previously been warned about this by Arbcom, in
583:
Despite my political bias, I, along with zscout370, suggested that keeping the article at its current name is just as politically not neutral as moving it to Diaoyu(tai), as each name suggests support for one side's view. As multiple editors attempted to use various forms of resource hits, it became
2609:
Notably, before the event even occurred, I'd already been expecting for Bob to pick a fight sooner or later in an attempt to delegitimize me. I was proven magnificently correct. It's difficult to believe it was an organic thought process (and not an opportunity to pick a fight) given how quickly it
2380:
Lvhis is not the main source of the trouble, but he has caused problems over his insistance that the relevant articles be tagged NPOV. It was disappointing that after I and some other users agreed to add an NPOV tag to the relevant article(s) as part of mediation, he declined to agree that it could
1484:
He demonstrated a low degree of knowledge of his opponents' arguments and evidence despite spending 10 months and 1 mediation on the topic, and despite the fact that his opponents' had been referring to them for quite a while. Concerning, he was planning to open yet another RfC on the topic, which
2136:
Account creation was on Sept. 10, 2010, just after the Sept. 7 Senkaku boat collision incident. After 31 edits, he came to the SI article talk page on Oct. 3. About 80% of his contributions are Senkaku related. He was away from WP from March 8 to May 25 when the articles were protected. Again in
696:
Incredibly he is still insisting he can misrepresent (or "interpret" as he put it) other editors' wording and freely impose his own view on what other editors actually say. Qwyrxian cannot be an administrator with this kind of egocentric mentality; otherwise he may be dishing out unfair blocks to
2409:
during a Wikiquette alert posting, Bob does not seem to think that it is important to consider how people might react to what he writes. I would draw attention to Qwyxian's collapsed comment in the above link, as well as Bob's inability to recognise he has done anything wrong. Bob has a point of
1488:
Even though the evidence of his opponents were shown to be diverse sets of manually verified samples of reliable literature sources taken from multiple respected repositories of information (i.e. Google Scholar, World Cat, JSTOR, etc), he repeatedly dismissed these evidence as unreliable Google
1122:
on the article talk page since the article was locked down. Tenmei gave a response in which he promoted use of more sources for that section. My request and his suggestions appear to have been ignored. STSC and PalaceGuard008's edits to the text I added were, in my opinion, not very helpful.
801:
A key issue for the pages in question is which name is from which language. I have repeatedly shown that there are Reliable Sources (two of them from Japanese authors to avoid POV) confirming "Pinnacle Islands" is the real English name while the current name "Senkaku" used for the pages is the
1206:
filed against him failed to improve the situation because xe was unwilling to consider xyr behavior to be a problem. Things became worse after Bobthefish2 returned from a Wikibreak. When problems occurred in Mediation, Bobthefish2 made them public, accusing mediator Feezo on usertalk pages of
1562:
Principle source of DISRUPT. Principle cause of mediation failure (attacked MedCom/Qwyrxian/myself, refused cooperation). Dumps excessive amount of irrelevant/long/incomprehensible/rude comments/attacks in discussions. Ignores pleas for better communication. See his RFCU for some details.
1146:
carries this name). Government possession appears to be a crucial factor in deciding the name given to groups of islands. Editors who dispute this too strongly give the impression that they are trying to reclaim the islands on behalf of the government which claims previous ownership.
3090:
While I certainly see the need to do something about this prolonged dispute and I acknowledge that Tenmei's style of communication is sometimes problematic, I would ask the committee members to consider these facts while you decide whether to throw Tenmei off the project or not.
3120:
Place argument and diffs which support your assertion; for example, your first assertion might be "So-and-so engages in edit warring", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits to specific articles which show So-and-so engaging in edit warring.
1227:
show xem refusing parts of guidelines that harm xyr position on "common sense" grounds while placing the burden on me to justify following them, along with a focus on minutiae designed to frustrate forward progress. A few days later, he resumed verbally attacking John Smith's
1895:
The diffs with citation support are evaluated by conventional processes ("verifiability, not truth"), which highlights stark differences between something and nothing. When anyone asserts "POV", there is no alchemy which converts that conclusory opinion into fact.
2371:
As Qwyrxian indicates, it would appear that he has a set position that means he will not accept "Senkaku Islands" as an article title under any circumstances. This is a roadblock to progressing the article. He has also joined in with edit-warring over the NPOV tag.
2310:
No response. The talk died out, and I couldn’t refute further. But Zscout370, Lvhis, and Penwhale still think PI would be a good option at here. And what is worse, their claim is based on misunderstanding. I have no idea who wrote it, but the description of LR at
1495:
Throughout the discussion, he aggressively pushed opponents to adhere every single rule of the guidelines. When legitimate concerns were raised (i.e sample size, narrowness of genre), he dismissed them as arbitrary reasons (also see Qwyrxian's evidence for that
3129:
Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion; for example, your second assertion might be "So-and-so makes personal attacks", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits where So-and-so made personal attacks.
1133:
As far as the name of the article, Japan's government administers the islands and its coast guard and other military forces keep them that way, so I think the appropriate name is fairly obvious. There is precedence for this in Knowledge. The southern
1684:
This focuses only on identifying culprits. This does little to help us perceive better options in the past or future. Some patterns can be discerned across several threads; and this kind of problem stands apart from searching for "bad apples", e.g.,
516:
for all actions of an editor (as those will have changed by the time people click on your links), although a link to a log for a specific article or a specific block log can be useful. Please make sure any page section links are permanent. See
3082:
I'm not really an involved party, but I did close the RFC on Tenmei's behavior that was filed back in March, and that is what I would like to discuss briefly. Tenmei asked a series of six questions which were fairly straightforward in nature
2496:
Bobthefish2 hides personal attacks/trolling behind the veneer of politeness. He is intelligent enough to be just so ambiguous to avoid a block and play the "I wasn't being mean" card but to still get under someone's skin. Examples:
507:
It is extremely important that you use the prescribed format. Submitted evidence should include a link to the actual page diff in question, or to a short page section; links to the page itself are insufficient. Never link to a
76: 2705:...he is correct; Tenmei should have been blocked, but it was not feasible because I already protected the page (it being clear my unorthodox solution had failed). I was ready to block Tenmei (and even wish I could have) 2429:
Bob also is not always transparent in complaining about other's behaviour. For example, see his comment in the above evidence where I discussed Penwhale's actions. For some reason he refers to me as "someone". Also note
865:" by asserting that "Knowledge actually doesn't strive to have cross-article consistency", i.e. refused to keep wiki NPOV consistency among articles when he replied user Marcopolo112233's challenge "Naming consistency" 540: 71: 2463:
My involvement has been limited to acting as a neutral administrator. I entered via the 3RR board, and remained involved via messages on my talk page, and some admin actions (protections, one block). I also invoked
2362:
He is too verbose. He seems to find it hard to get his points across in ways that users can understand. He can result in delay in dealing with matters, but I don't think he is the main cause of the problems here.
1309:. Sadly, the combination of Tenmei's inability to get his point across on talk, along with his conviction that every edit he makes is "pro-Knowledge", renders his presence on these articles a net negative. 2262:
When I saw the POV tag, I asked myself "Who think it's biased?". North and South America, Europe, Africa, Middle East…most people are indifferent or don’t think it biased. My answer was Chinese, Taiwanese,
525: 65: 54: 2641:. In that diff Tenmei implied (by referring to commentary on Mozart having "too many notes") that criticizing him for writing too long is unacceptable because such lengthy commentary is "essential in 2153: 584:
clear that there doesn't seem to be an overwhelming domination of one term over the other in western usage. Thus, both me and zscout370 suggested a move to a neutral title similar to what was done at
2150: 536: 359: 60: 1492:
When concerns were raised about the exceedingly small sample size (n=5) of his almanacs, he dismissed these critiques by telling his opponents to open a publishing company to print more samples.
1006:. User Qwyrxian neither reported this violation to admin Magog nor assisted to enforce the sanction fairly to stop edit-warring. Instead, he made an excuse for user Tenmei to game the system 396: 228: 2477: 2239:
Bobthefish2, Lvhis, and STSC have been talking about other editors, especially about those who with different views, and about the articles. I've never seen this kind of talks before.
43: 161: 760:
While debating on the usage of Diaoyu and Diaoyutai in the articles, he went on to vandalize the "Chinese people" article to push his POV that the people of the ROC are not Chinese:
2572: 390: 2578:
Notice the tactic was successful; Lvhis went from accepting his block as correct (see above) to being "confused and disappointed" and thinking his original block unjust (see
2210: 38: 29: 2630:
It is difficult to criticize an editor for being too wordy, but Tenmei deserves criticism. See Qwyrxian's comments above; our conversations feel like communicating with the
1467:
Frequently held one or two parties solely responsible for systemic problems caused by numerous parties (including himself). See Qwyrxian’s evidence and content above/below.
1221:
I believe that Bobthefish2 has switched from pursuing DR to intentionally disrupting the process by baiting other users and trying to drive users away by upsetting them.
847:. By this means he refused to reach consensus on an edited version that was a certain consensus supported by the reliable sources and an outcome from previous discussion 1142:
Russia's possession of these islands. The English Knowledge article for them is the Kuril Islands, although the Japanese name is "Chishima Islands" (the article in the
575:
tag that was placed (and removed) by Feezo in an attempt to mediate the case, as by virtue of the discussion at the talk page, I felt the tag should have been in place.
532:. Please do not try to refactor the page or remove evidence presented by others. If something is put in the wrong place, leave it for the Arbitrators or Clerks to move. 354: 1339:
implies he will never accept the name Senkaku, no matter how many times consensus favors it; this refusal to accept consensus is antithetical to collaborative editing.
539:. /Workshop provides for comment by parties and others as well as Arbitrators. After arriving at proposed principles, findings of fact or remedies, Arbitrators vote at 1783: 386: 182: 174: 817:
repeatedly using Original Research asserted that the Japanese name is the real English name, and refused to provide reliable sources when requested for several times
2418:. It would have cost him nothing to make up with Oda Mari, but again he didn't see that he had done anything wrong. Bob also loves to poke away at me, referring to 1306: 2282:
Conclusion: Only Chinese and Taiwanese think Senkaku biased. Those who say the SI is a biased name are CPOV pushers, abusing NPOV policy. Additionally, when I saw
328: 2005: 2445:
Bob has clearly demonstrated that he is not capable or interested in working in a collaborative way with editors he disagrees with on issues such as this.
1485:
would've been a tremendous waste of time (like this ArbCom case) since he did not seem capable of (or willing to) pay attention to what his opponents said.
348: 193: 171: 2563:), but that Tenmei didn't actually break BRD. Bob simply kept arguing and deflecting the issue and never directly addressed BRD. It was a classic case of 2927: 381: 319: 238: 166: 2649:
talk like this, and all of us are wrong for not following his lead. The result is that no one reads Tenmei, meanwhile he ignores other editor's points (
1176:
I believe there are three editors who are causing the bulk of the problems on these pages; a fourth is generally good though needs a little bit of AGF.
1489:
search results. Instead, he stubbornly wanted undue weight to be given to his small encyclopedia/almanacs that he hand-sampled from his local library.
1203: 1051: 2980: 2442:, though it's obvious he can only be referring to me, Tenmei, Oda Mari, Phoenix777 and Qwyrxian. This does not suggest he is acting in good faith. 455: 324: 1317:
For a long time, STSC has treated his "opponents" on the Senkaku Islands articles with disrespect by accusing them of sabotage and hidden agendas (
2342: 334: 314: 197: 1215:. I'm certain MedCom can vouch that this is not what actually occurred. Bobthefish2 continued to try building a battleground mentality in Lvhis ( 2473: 1282: 780: 685: 623:--- How could the title with the Japanese name "Senkaku Islands" be established as NPOV while Japan is a participant in the territory dispute? 339: 252: 233: 2086:. If we focus on what went right, it helps clarify the contrast with what went wrong. The edits of Lvhis were small steps towards successful 3076: 2872: 2737: 1267:
he included 2 tables, a DR graph, 10 diffs, 3 wiktionary definition-links, etc.; xyr message failed to be conveyed. Similar recent example:
373: 264: 2120: 518: 297: 2921: 2684: 2568: 2083: 223: 152: 25: 1264: 2809: 2688: 1118:, in which he/she introduced text which appears to dispute the assertions from the source. I noticed what had happened in April, and 3033: 2974: 1354:
in mediation, even though mediation simply ended without any resolution (though not Lvhis's fault), or that I am blatantly flouting
1078: 1762:
Characterising the participants as "both sides pretty much entrenched and non-collaborative" is a self-fulfilling prophesy and the
1111:. STSC's addition of the word "technically" to the text is supported by the source, but the "citation needed" tags are not, as the 678:
diff no. 76: Hounding the light-hearted chats on the personal talk pages is just pettiness; it should not be used as "evidence".
2472:
rule on one page, in a vain attempt to avoid arbitration, for which I had the consent of all relevant parties on the talk page (
528:. If you think another editor's evidence is a misrepresentation of the facts, cite the evidence and explain how it is incorrect 289: 129: 3100: 2099: 1944: 1156: 1090: 1067: 1041: 939: 901: 673:
diff no. 75: I just expressed my observation in this section: Gaming the system is an improper use of Policy and is forbidden.
2866: 2731: 1538:
and blocked Lvhis for breaking BRD. Later, Tenmei broke BRD and Magog refused to block arguing that Tenmei did not break BRD
756: 710: 674: 669: 275: 218: 21: 2488:
I have observed mainly 4 editors: Bobthefish2, Tenmei, Lvhis, and Qwyrxian. The biggest problems came from the former two.
1668:
A small step back makes it possible to begin to discern patterns and to mitigate some of the ways our process falls short.
1634: 210: 2222: 1622:
as one of the evidence, someone quietly changed that page w/o discussion/notification (swiftly reverted by someone else)
650:
Qwyrxian was digging out the talk page archives about one year ago when he was not even involved in editing the article.
2677: 2615: 1822:. These are not dispensable when POV is alleged to be a red flag -- in other words, ignoring the elephant in the room 448: 260: 158: 1366:
that other users really are trying to apply the rules, even when interpretations differ, xe will be good to work with.
2945: 2803: 1801:
Some of the foreseeable consequences of some problems are mitigated by identifying them -- in other words, naming the
1629: 1127: 680:
I have not accused anyone of sabotage. He was the one very much disrespecting me in saying I adding the POV-title tag
270: 188: 1350:). The only major problem is when the stubbornness combines with misinterpretation. It concerns me that Lvhis thinks 892:" has made consensus practically impossible in solving disputes not only on page edition but also on naming issue. -- 634:--- If "Senkaku Islands" is the English name, then "Diaoyu Islands" or "Diaoyutai Islands" is also the English name. 3027: 2316: 309: 842:. He demonstrated that he did not possess a basic background of the naming history for this geographical entity 2998: 2933: 2785:
Many of the editors below have edit warred extensively (e.g., Phoenix7777 with ~6 non-BRD revisions in SID alone
1979:). This was his first and only citation-supported edit up to that point. The CNN reference was previously cited 107: 2589:
He did this to mediator Feezo (see Qwyrxian's statement) until Feezo got fed up and labeled Bobthefish2 a troll.
1362:
as xe explains in xyr Evidence, when I'm just trying to following policy as best as I can. If Lvhis would just
1250:
In sum, I believe that Bobthefish2's uncivil disruption is actively preventing forward progress on these pages.
413: 2673: 2650: 2564: 1197:), and a willingness to game the system (xe advocated getting the page locked so that people give up and leave 735:
Whether I personally agree to the current title or not does not prevent the progressing of the article at all.
93: 2915: 1636:
and attacked an admin from Taiwan (Penwhale) for alleged COI in re-instating the POV tag on the article name.
2986: 1976: 1814:
Our conventional processes and threshold requirements for inclusion in Knowledge parse distinctions between
950: 543:. Only Arbitrators (and clerks, when clarification on votes is needed) may edit the proposed decision page. 441: 1009:. When Tenmei came back from his "wiki pause" of such gaming, he challenged the sanction bolder and bolder 2890: 2755: 1542: 1291:. After I explained that his writing was overlong and incomprehensible, xe responded with another section 509: 2968: 2775: 2683:
At one point, Tenmei said he was withdrawing from the page, only to come back and continue an edit war (
2642: 2087: 1502:, and then returned to complain about me taking advantage of him along with some pretty erratic comments 1139: 569: 148: 118: 17: 717:
She used Twinkle to push her POV and remove the POV-title tags on the articles without a valid reason:
3096: 2878: 2743: 2669: 1802: 1232: 772: 562: 492:
Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Create your own section and
102: 2406: 2827: 2393:
article, Lvhis has also kept reinserting the tag, suggesting that it is needed because there is an
954: 945:
Improper conduct with double standards and gaming the system ruined efforts preventing edit-warring
88: 2323:
The neutrality of the name is accidental. LR was chosen because it's the common name. But not PI.
1115:
contained all the information included in my original edit. Later, PalaceGuard008 made this edit
3051: 2910: 2860: 2725: 1108:. On 23 January 2011, STSC split the paragraphs I had written, and added "citation needed" tags 1738: 1432: 1138:
belonged to Japan from 1855 until 1945, when they were occupied by Russia at the end of WWII.
2815: 1415: 662:
of the article. The article has been improved partly because of my involvement in the edits.
3039: 2963: 2264: 2095: 1940: 919: 881: 415: 113: 1112: 629:"my stance has always been that "Senkaku Islands" is the real English name for the islands" 3092: 2797: 2397:. I would argue that if it wasn't for Lvhis, there would be no edit-warring over the tag. 2390: 2334: 2295: 1904: 1152: 1086: 1063: 1037: 997:. No response from the admin during a period of 31 hours with 4 reports on this violation 935: 897: 862: 585: 418: 3021: 2692: 2661: 2321: 2015: 1355: 927: 889: 871: 1119: 2855: 2720: 2469: 2465: 2326: 1763: 1665:
This "evidence" nudges select topics towards a practical, forward-looking outcome.
1499:
In the midst of the discussion, he attacked me (see #4 below), then got stressed out
1393:– Edit-war/disruptive-editing accusation. Ironically, Qwyrxian defended me back then 1363: 1359: 1135: 923: 908: 885: 814: 627:
Insisting that only "Senkaku Islands" should be used because it is the English name:
2123:
and was caused by some Chinese editors driven by their nationalism at the incident.
2338: 995: 989: 915: 706: 949:
This was mainly done by some users authorized with adminship in managing the page
137: 1297:
Tenmei sometimes tries to compel others to change their words or speak for them (
1143: 2699: 2657: 2410:
view, and that's all that's important. Despite the fact that Oda Mari had taken
2091: 2060: 2050: 1936: 1928: 1463:
Qwyrxian's presence in the article pages has been quite unproductive recently:
976: 957:
for this page and worked quite well at beginning, though with a cost that I was
513: 3111:
before using the last evidence template, please make a copy for the next person
2792: 2346: 1900: 1782:
Unstated premises in the scope of arbitration need to be made explicit, e.g.,
1148: 1082: 1059: 1033: 931: 893: 691: 2560:
I made crystal clear that Lvhis' block was for BRD (even Lvhis accepted this
1971:
A. Lvhis edited the text and added an inline citation in the first paragraph
1628:
Another fruitless discussion where parties refused to remove dubious sources
1335:). Furthermore, even though STSC disputes my interpretation, I still believe 3016: 2700:
Re: Lvhis' above claiming my second protection in lieu of a block was unfair
1470:
Accused me of OWN when I wanted to request user-ban for tendentious-editing
497: 483: 417: 1192:
where he incites new editor Lvhis to adopt the same attitude), incivility (
1105:
In December 2010 I made the following edits to the Senkaku Islands article
971:). Some sort of consensus for editing a part had even been reached (when 697:
other editors simply based on his own "interpretation" and not the facts.
2217: 2163:
Pushing a fabricated news article in zh as RS when there were en sources.
751:
He frequently used " no consensus" as a reason to prevent any NPOV edit:
2286:, I thought "Any name will do for them but the single use of Senkaku". 1396:, although he's now accusing me of gaming the system (see his evidence). 1239:
which are at best in poor taste and at worst racist. He described me as
2206:
He may not be a SPA, but about 70% of his contributions are SI related.
1935:. Getting this right forms the basis of good decisions in this case. -- 1866: 1819: 1126:
I was partially involved in a similar dispute a few years ago over the
1784:
Knowledge:Requests for mediation/Senkaku Islands#Issues to be mediated
857:
Qwyrxian also opposed the common applicability of Knowledge guideline
692:
There's the real danger of Qwyrxian misusing his administrator's power
561:
My involvement in this case is only restricted to a discussion on the
2631: 2330: 2294:
Zscout370 suggested the Pinnacle Islands was the only option, citing
991:
which interrupted another ongoing discussion obeying the sanction at
2634:. He explicitly refused my request to be more concise... by quoting 2685:
User talk:Magog the Ogre/Archive 15#Senkaku Islands dispute, Tenmei
1545:
and she eventually agreed Magog's approach and verdicts were wrong
1401:– Rude comments that were followed by endorsement by another party 486:. Evidence longer than this will be refactored or removed entirely. 2665: 2478:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive712#Sanctions
2436:
5 guaranteed votes for status quo regardless of evidence presented
1554:
and started some pretty vile attacks (also see Magog's evidence).
1047: 1510:. He then disregarded explanations as to why they weren't racist 2315:
was totally wrong. If you know the dispute well, it’s obvious.
1836: 1815: 1380:
Disregarded Examples of Incivility/Battleground/Personal Attacks
1347:
Lvhis is mostly a good editor. Sometimes Lvhis is too stubborn (
1024:, and eventually has made admin Magog fully protected that page 975:). But later this sanction became actually in vain, not only by 713:
of Wiki contributions can reveal a great deal of revert actions.
611:
Nonsensical reasoning by Qwyrxian that has prolonged the dispute
2621:
of his contributions are to articles. Not including mediation.
2474:
Talk:Senkaku_Islands_dispute/Archive 5#BRD_cycle,_crystal_clear
1507:
He condemned some comics were racist when they really weren't.
2614:
Over 50% of Bob's contributions are to User talk or Knowledge
1520:
to be baited, and held others responsible for his misdemeanor
1259:
attacks the very people who try to help xem. A few examples:
880:
As a consequence, Qwyrxian's such violation of Wiki policies "
496:. Please limit your evidence to a maximum of 500 words and 50 467: 419: 2438:. Although I ask him to clarify his comment, he does not say 1616:
Fruitless discussions about Taiwanese people are not Chinese
779:, then more chunks of obscure text (and graphics) after that: 775:; he would revert and bomb you with a chunk of obscure text: 654:
John Smith's insisting to remove "Japan lost the war in 1945"
2033: 1957: 1825: 870:, and as he always does, he intentionally avoided referring 524:
This page is not for general discussion - for that, see the
2617:(i.e., pages where he's arguing about arguing). Currently, 2039:
B. Lvhis added words and other citations were moved, e.g.,
1454:- Accused placement of NPOV template as Chinese POV-pushing 2766:- I have observed nothing but exemplary behavior from him. 2290:
I didn’t hear that the Liancourt Rocks was the common name
1285:, and you'll see 3 different unhelpful images from Tenmei. 2653:) in a flurry of text that makes it difficult to discern. 535:
Arbitrators may analyze evidence and other assertions at
2242:(Though inactive since December 19, San9663 was a SPA.) 968:(which only took less than 2 hours after I was reported 797:
Qwyrxian has used Original Research preventing consensus
3084: 3065: 3063: 3057: 3045: 3012: 3010: 3004: 2992: 2959: 2957: 2951: 2939: 2906: 2904: 2902: 2896: 2884: 2851: 2849: 2847: 2845: 2843: 2841: 2839: 2833: 2821: 2786: 2761: 2749: 2708: 2706: 2639: 2604: 2601: 2598: 2595: 2590: 2579: 2561: 2550: 2548: 2546: 2543: 2541: 2539: 2533: 2532:
Telling opponent he will be greatly missed with smiley
2527: 2525: 2522: 2516: 2514: 2512: 2509: 2504: 2502: 2439: 2431: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2394: 2386: 2382: 2324: 2319: 2312: 2308: 2305: 2302: 2299: 2283: 2280: 2278: 2276: 2274: 2272: 2270: 2268: 2253: 2251: 2249: 2247: 2245: 2243: 2240: 2229: 2226: 2195: 2193: 2191: 2185: 2183: 2181: 2175: 2173: 2171: 2169: 2167: 2165: 2157:
Left a comment to the canvassing thread Lvhis created.
2138: 2079: 2064: 2054: 2040: 2019: 2009: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1972: 1932: 1921: 1916: 1911: 1882: 1876: 1852: 1846: 1808: 1795: 1789: 1770: 1756: 1744: 1733: 1726: 1719: 1713: 1708: 1701: 1695: 1689: 1681: 1677: 1650: 1646: 1623: 1620: 1617: 1612: 1610: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1584: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1572: 1552: 1549: 1546: 1539: 1536: 1521: 1517: 1511: 1508: 1500: 1479: 1477: 1471: 1452: 1450: 1445: 1443: 1438: 1436: 1434: 1430: 1428: 1423: 1421: 1408: 1406: 1402: 1399: 1394: 1391: 1389: 1387: 1385: 1352:
xe/they managed to prove SI supporters completely wrong
1351: 1348: 1336: 1333: 1330: 1327: 1324: 1321: 1318: 1298: 1292: 1289: 1277: 1274: 1268: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1229: 1225: 1222: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1200: 1198: 1195: 1193: 1190: 1187: 1185: 1116: 1109: 1106: 1055: 1030: 1028: 1025: 1022: 1020: 1018: 1016: 1014: 1012: 1010: 1007: 1004: 1002: 1000: 998: 992: 986: 983: 980: 972: 969: 966: 964: 962: 875: 868: 866: 858: 852: 850: 848: 845: 843: 840: 838: 836: 834: 832: 830: 828: 826: 824: 822: 820: 818: 811: 809: 807: 805: 803: 776: 761: 752: 746: 742: 738: 725: 722: 719: 681: 665: 659: 653: 628: 617: 429: 344: 302: 178: 2573:
User:Magog the Ogre/Senkaku Arbitration - BRD instance
2267:, and CPOV supporters. I asked Penwhale the question. 1551:. Later, Magog said I’m nothing but troll due to this 482:. Keep your evidence to a maximum of 500 words and 50 2220:
at zh WP and was told “dual name title is too long”.
1759:, which begs questions which appear to be ignored. 1050:
when he was elected new admin though I made my firm
1048:
would improve himself and help to solve this dispute
953:. Initially an unorthodox sanction was set by admin 874:
when he mentioned some wiki guidelines and policies
709:
to revert the edits that are not to her liking. Her
478:
Create your own section to provide evidence in, and
2594:I allegedly went from being Bob's "favorite admin" 2405:Bob pretends to be funny but causes disruption. As 1682:"censure of the bad apples would be quite helpful." 985:) but also by user Qwyrxian's cooperative "revert" 737:He is responsible for a number of major edit-wars: 658:diff no. 73: I just expressed my view based on the 2508:Refusing to take discussion off Feezo's talk page 2476:) and for which I received no disapproval at ANI ( 1954:More than one ball in the air at the same time. 1184:Bobthefish2 has long had a battlefield mentality ( 1073:A response to Evidence presented by Magog the Ogre 2082:thwarted the delicate evolving collaboration. He 652:diff no. 71 & 72: The arguement was based on 618:"We've established before that the title is NPOV" 2538:Frequent use of smileys in obviously aggressive 2345:'s approved names and used by the US government 1027:. Agreeing on user Bobthefishe2's question here 1307:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Tang Dynasty 1288:Failure to understand xyr style isn't working: 2603:and sinister enforcement of a double standard 682:"simply because you don't agree with the name" 2660:, then edit warring is not edit warring, and 2412:left the discussion because of Bob's attitude 2257: 449: 8: 2664:is irrelevant. Initially this appears to be 2006:Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea 2585:Delegitimization of neutral administrators 2575:(I highly request and suggest you read it). 2571:). For a fuller explanation the event, see 2501:Implying editors are "1337" and unemployed 2454:Current word length: 699; diff count: 41. 2110:Current word length: 500; diff count: 31. 1661:Current word length: 574; diff count: 31. 1375:Current word length: 725; diff count: 48. 1233:Talk:Senkaku Islands#Encyclopedias/almanacs 1167:Current word length: 681; diff count: 31. 792:Current word length: 550; diff count: 49. 606:Current word length: 521; diff count: 14. 2317:Knowledge:Lamest edit wars#Liancourt Rocks 2258:I just don't like it /any name but Senkaku 2084:"snatched defeat from the jaws of victory" 1609:Repeated edit-wars caused page protection 1101:Current word length: 387; diff count: 3. 973:Qwyrxian had wiki break for certain reason 616:Insisting that "Senkaku Islands" is NPOV: 552:Current word length: 282; diff count: 0. 456: 442: 125: 1931:factors affect our ability to figure out 1425:– "Shill", "seduced by fraud", "con-game" 1757:sometimes prevention is better than cure 1294:that's even longer and harder to follow. 747:edit-war on "Japan lost the war in 1945" 2556:Re: block of Lvhis/non-block of Tenmei 2521:Reference to editors' mental stability 1899:In all the diffs above, the persisting 666:Phoenix7777 removing the POV-check tag. 664:diff no. 74: The argument was based on 500:. Giving a short, concise presentation 128: 3106:Evidence presented by {your user name} 2645:". In other words, Tenmei implies he 1933:what is causing people to behave badly 1680:is reflected by Magog who argues that 1526:Gamed the system (See Magog_the_Ogre). 1332:). STSC treats the subject as a war ( 1283:Talk:Senkaku Islands dispute/Archive 1 642:diff no. 52: The should have been . 3077:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Tenmei 2788:) , but I am only showing one issue. 2137:June when the mediation was pending. 872:the most suitable Knowledge guideline 494:do not edit in anybody else's section 7: 2449:Evidence presented by Magog the Ogre 2121:2010 Senkaku boat collision incident 1046:I once ignited a hope that Qwyrxian 684:in spite of my explanation earlier ( 229:Clarification and Amendment requests 2422:and suggesting that I come from an 2304:His next post was a misconception. 2656:Tenmei thinks if something passes 2353:Evidence presented by John Smith's 2209:Canvassing at zh WP in en and zh. 1213:lacks competence and starts fights 700: 512:, an editor's contributions, or a 36: 2672:. (proof: read at your own risk: 1459:Disruptive Behaviours of Qwyrxian 1370:Evidence presented by Bobthefish2 757:Talk:SI/Archive 4 - Verifiability 705:She frequently abused the use of 480:do not edit anyone else's section 3071:Evidence presented by Beeblebrox 1535:He imposed break-BRD=block rule 1523:(and see last point on #3 above) 660:01:54, 24 September 2010 version 471: 136: 2329:(UNESCO uses Ogasawara Islands 1727:subsequent Q-diff (31 Aug 2011) 766: 743:edit-war on questionable image. 3101:19:29, 29 September 2011 (UTC) 2689:straw causing this arbitration 2420:the loss of the British Empire 2105:Evidence presented by Oda Mari 2100:21:05, 12 September 2011 (UTC) 1751:Prevention is better than cure 1162:Evidence presented by Qwyrxian 547:Evidence presented by Penwhale 1: 2597:and receiving his acceptance 2127:Bobthefish2, a disruptive SPA 1945:22:14, 7 September 2011 (UTC) 1091:22:01, 9 September 2011 (UTC) 701:Oda Mari's habit of reverting 2691:). It was pure unacceptable 2313:WP:NCGN#Multiple local names 2225:Requested Penwhale to edit. 2119:The recent mess began after 1999:Articles about sources cited 1656:Evidence presented by Tenmei 1054:in his RfA. Now I have been 859:WP:NCGN#Multiple local names 668:I initiated the discussion. 360:Conflict of interest reports 3125:{Write your assertion here} 3116:{Write your assertion here} 2638:different literary sources 2459:Background - my involvement 1755:John Smith's suggests that 1243:and Magog and me as having 1231:plus the collapsed part of 1157:01:59, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 1128:Sea of Japan naming dispute 1096:Evidence presented by Cla68 1068:18:25, 30 August 2011 (UTC) 1042:18:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC) 940:17:58, 30 August 2011 (UTC) 902:17:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC) 787:Evidence presented by Lvhis 189:Search archived proceedings 3144: 2545:and borderline aggressive 2228:It was answered promptly. 1739:thread (29 Jan-4 Feb 2011) 1211:, and implying that Feezo 731:A response to John Smith's 601:Evidence presented by STSC 519:simple diff and link guide 234:Arbitrator motion requests 2581:and his statement above). 2524:and refusal to apologize 2387:after Oda Mari removed it 1987:(compare Penwhale's diff 1513:and proceeded to throw a 861:and the typical example " 739:edit-war on POV-title tag 563:Senkaku Islands talk page 1964:Sequence of edit history 1245:forgotten our medication 930:" following Qwyrxian. -- 767:Tenmei's edit-war tactic 2668:, but it might also be 2440:who he was referring to 2383:after Tenmei removed it 1977:Senkaku Islands dispute 1714:thread (29-30 Jan 2011) 1690:thread (26-27 Jan 2011) 1235:), which culminated in 951:Senkaku Islands dispute 530:within your own section 2214:Chinese admin shopping 1796:T-diff (28 April 2011) 1543:User:Elen_of_the_Roads 1476:In two recent threads 646:A response to Qwyrxian 502:will be more effective 2643:collaborative editing 2518:(all oh so politely). 2088:collaborative editing 1922:L-diff (30 July 2011) 1917:L-diff (29 July 2011) 1766:is misleading, e.g., 1079:this page's talk page 565:and restoration of a 430:Track related changes 290:Arbitration Committee 130:Knowledge Arbitration 18:Knowledge:Arbitration 2687:). The edit was the 2416:refused to apologise 2189:Unnecessary comments 2148:Canvassing at zh WP. 1883:S-diff (13 Aug 2011) 1809:J-diff (14 Oct 2011) 1803:elephant in the room 1734:Q-diff (9 June 2011) 1720:Q-diff (30 Jan 2011) 1709:Q-diff (9 June 2011) 1702:B-diff (27 Jan 2011) 1696:Q-diff (27 Jan 2011) 1676:Qwyrxian's overview 1633:Someone started ANI 1418:, without substance. 1241:foaming at the mouth 1056:totally disappointed 592:Response to Oda Mari 239:Enforcement requests 167:Guide to arbitration 99:Drafting arbitrators 2424:ex-first rate power 1912:S-diff (3 May 2011) 1877:Q-diff (4 Aug 2011) 1863:DIFFS (unsupported) 1853:T-diff (4 Aug 2011) 1847:T-diff (1 Aug 2011) 1790:thread (5 May 2011) 1771:Q-diff (4 Feb 2011) 1745:Q-diff (3 Feb 2011) 1447:– Attacks on MedCom 988:and a "discussion" 918:she also violated " 771:He is similar to a 675:(Talk:SI/Archive 4) 670:(Talk:SI/Archive 4) 638:A response to Cla68 2771:Edit warring over 2468:to apply a strict 2341:. All of them are 2307:I pointed it out. 2216:Asked for help to 2063:created by Tenmei 2053:created by Tenmei 2008:created by Tenmei 1440:– Personal-attacks 1144:Japanese Knowledge 781:Talk:SId/Archive 4 686:Talk/SId/Archive 4 541:/Proposed decision 261:Contentious topics 159:Arbitration policy 2651:WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT 2565:WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT 2484:General statement 2235:Possible tag team 2115:General statement 2078:Qwyrixian's diff 2075: 2074: 2030: 2029: 1892: 1891: 1778:Unstated premises 1416:smoke_and_mirrors 1237:links to cartoons 1209:lack of expertise 1172:General statement 490: 489: 466: 465: 433: 401: 271:General sanctions 219:All open requests 149:About arbitration 122: 111: 97: 80: 72:Proposed decision 69: 58: 47: 3135: 3061: 3034:deleted contribs 3008: 2981:deleted contribs 2955: 2928:deleted contribs 2900: 2873:deleted contribs 2837: 2810:deleted contribs 2780: 2774: 2765: 2738:deleted contribs 2265:Overseas Chinese 2159:On June 23 in zh 2034: 1958: 1950:Getting it right 1826: 574: 568: 475: 474: 468: 458: 451: 444: 432: 427: 420: 399: 355:Clerk procedures 347: 305: 276:Editor sanctions 253:Active sanctions 211:Open proceedings 181: 140: 126: 116: 105: 91: 74: 63: 52: 41: 3143: 3142: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3127: 3118: 3108: 3080: 3073: 3019: 2966: 2913: 2858: 2795: 2778: 2772: 2723: 2717: 2702: 2627: 2511:multiple times 2494: 2486: 2461: 2451: 2403: 2391:Senkaku Islands 2385:and then again 2378: 2369: 2360: 2355: 2352: 2335:Liancourt Rocks 2296:Liancourt Rocks 2292: 2260: 2237: 2203: 2154:On Oct. 7 in en 2151:On Oct. 7 in en 2145: 2134: 2129: 2117: 2107: 2076: 2031: 2012:12 October 2010 1952: 1905:bait and switch 1903:of issues is a 1893: 1871: 1841: 1833:DIFFS + support 1794: 1780: 1753: 1743: 1731: 1724: 1718: 1706: 1700: 1694: 1674: 1658: 1643: 1606: 1569: 1560: 1533: 1461: 1382: 1372: 1345: 1315: 1281:Scroll through 1273:Latin phrases: 1256: 1182: 1174: 1164: 1098: 1075: 947: 912: 863:Liancourt Rocks 799: 789: 769: 733: 730: 703: 694: 648: 640: 613: 603: 594: 586:Liancourt Rocks 581: 572: 566: 559: 549: 472: 462: 428: 422: 421: 416: 406: 405: 404: 393: 376: 366: 365: 364: 351: 343: 331: 306: 301: 292: 282: 281: 280: 255: 245: 244: 243: 213: 203: 200: 185: 177: 155: 124: 103:John Vandenberg 34: 33: 32: 30:Senkaku Islands 12: 11: 5: 3141: 3139: 3126: 3123: 3117: 3114: 3107: 3104: 3079: 3074: 3072: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3014: 2961: 2908: 2853: 2783: 2782: 2768: 2767: 2716: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2701: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2681: 2654: 2626: 2623: 2612: 2611: 2608: 2607: 2600:to censorship 2592: 2583: 2582: 2577: 2576: 2554: 2553: 2536: 2530: 2519: 2506: 2493: 2490: 2485: 2482: 2460: 2457: 2450: 2447: 2402: 2399: 2377: 2374: 2368: 2365: 2359: 2356: 2354: 2351: 2291: 2288: 2259: 2256: 2236: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2224: 2221: 2215: 2212: 2207: 2202: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2190: 2187: 2180: 2177: 2164: 2161: 2156: 2149: 2144: 2141: 2133: 2130: 2128: 2125: 2116: 2113: 2106: 2103: 2073: 2072: 2069: 2068: 2058: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2032: 2028: 2027: 2024: 2023: 2016:Unryu Suganuma 2013: 2002: 2001: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1956: 1951: 1948: 1925: 1924: 1919: 1914: 1907:tactic, e.g. 1890: 1889: 1886: 1885: 1879: 1873: 1869: 1864: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1849: 1843: 1839: 1834: 1824: 1812: 1811: 1799: 1798: 1792: 1779: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1752: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1741: 1736: 1729: 1722: 1716: 1711: 1704: 1698: 1692: 1673: 1670: 1657: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1648: 1642: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1631: 1626: 1614: 1605: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1580: 1576: 1568: 1565: 1559: 1556: 1532: 1531:Magog_the_Ogre 1529: 1528: 1527: 1524: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1497: 1493: 1490: 1486: 1474: 1468: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1448: 1441: 1426: 1419: 1404: 1397: 1381: 1378: 1371: 1368: 1344: 1341: 1337:this statement 1314: 1311: 1302: 1301: 1295: 1286: 1279: 1271: 1255: 1252: 1181: 1178: 1173: 1170: 1163: 1160: 1140:Japan disputes 1097: 1094: 1074: 1071: 979:'s violation ( 955:Magog the Ogre 946: 943: 911: 905: 802:Japanese name 798: 795: 788: 785: 768: 765: 759: 750: 736: 732: 729: 718: 714: 702: 699: 693: 690: 679: 677: 672: 663: 657: 651: 647: 644: 639: 636: 632: 631: 621: 620: 612: 609: 602: 599: 593: 590: 580: 577: 558: 557:My Involvement 555: 548: 545: 488: 487: 476: 464: 463: 461: 460: 453: 446: 438: 435: 434: 424: 423: 414: 412: 411: 408: 407: 403: 402: 394: 389: 384: 378: 377: 372: 371: 368: 367: 363: 362: 357: 352: 342: 337: 332: 327: 322: 317: 312: 307: 300: 294: 293: 288: 287: 284: 283: 279: 278: 273: 268: 257: 256: 251: 250: 247: 246: 242: 241: 236: 231: 226: 221: 215: 214: 209: 208: 205: 204: 202: 201: 196: 191: 186: 176: 169: 164: 156: 151: 145: 142: 141: 133: 132: 89:AlexandrDmitri 39:Main case page 37: 35: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3140: 3131: 3124: 3122: 3115: 3113: 3112: 3105: 3103: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3088: 3086: 3078: 3075: 3070: 3066: 3064: 3059: 3056: 3053: 3050: 3047: 3044: 3041: 3038: 3035: 3032: 3029: 3026: 3023: 3018: 3015: 3013: 3011: 3006: 3003: 3000: 2997: 2994: 2991: 2988: 2985: 2982: 2979: 2976: 2973: 2970: 2965: 2962: 2960: 2958: 2953: 2950: 2947: 2944: 2941: 2938: 2935: 2932: 2929: 2926: 2923: 2920: 2917: 2912: 2909: 2907: 2905: 2903: 2898: 2895: 2892: 2889: 2886: 2883: 2880: 2877: 2874: 2871: 2868: 2865: 2862: 2857: 2854: 2852: 2850: 2848: 2846: 2844: 2842: 2840: 2835: 2832: 2829: 2826: 2823: 2820: 2817: 2814: 2811: 2808: 2805: 2802: 2799: 2794: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2787: 2777: 2770: 2769: 2763: 2760: 2757: 2754: 2751: 2748: 2745: 2742: 2739: 2736: 2733: 2730: 2727: 2722: 2719: 2718: 2714: 2709: 2707: 2704: 2703: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2637: 2633: 2632:Tamarian race 2629: 2628: 2624: 2622: 2620: 2616: 2605: 2602: 2599: 2596: 2593: 2591: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2580: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2551: 2549: 2547: 2544: 2542: 2540: 2537: 2534: 2531: 2528: 2526: 2523: 2520: 2517: 2515: 2513: 2510: 2507: 2505: 2503: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2491: 2489: 2483: 2481: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2458: 2456: 2455: 2448: 2446: 2443: 2441: 2437: 2434:reference to 2433: 2427: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2408: 2400: 2398: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2375: 2373: 2366: 2364: 2357: 2350: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2327:Bonin Islands 2325: 2322: 2320: 2318: 2314: 2309: 2306: 2303: 2300: 2297: 2289: 2287: 2285: 2281: 2279: 2277: 2275: 2273: 2271: 2269: 2266: 2255: 2254: 2252: 2250: 2248: 2246: 2244: 2241: 2234: 2230: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2213: 2211: 2208: 2205: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2194: 2192: 2188: 2186: 2184: 2182: 2178: 2176: 2174: 2172: 2170: 2168: 2166: 2162: 2160: 2155: 2152: 2147: 2146: 2142: 2140: 2139: 2131: 2126: 2124: 2122: 2114: 2112: 2111: 2104: 2102: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2071: 2067:4 August 2011 2066: 2062: 2059: 2057:4 August 2011 2056: 2052: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2042: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2026: 2021: 2017: 2014: 2011: 2007: 2004: 2003: 2000: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1969: 1965: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1955: 1949: 1947: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1923: 1920: 1918: 1915: 1913: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1906: 1902: 1897: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1878: 1874: 1868: 1865: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1854: 1850: 1848: 1844: 1838: 1835: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1823: 1821: 1817: 1810: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1797: 1791: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1777: 1772: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1765: 1764:false dilemma 1760: 1758: 1750: 1746: 1740: 1737: 1735: 1728: 1721: 1715: 1712: 1710: 1703: 1697: 1691: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1683: 1679: 1671: 1669: 1666: 1663: 1662: 1655: 1651: 1649: 1647: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1635: 1632: 1630: 1627: 1624: 1621: 1618: 1615: 1613: 1611: 1608: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1597: 1595: 1593: 1591: 1589: 1587: 1585: 1583: 1581: 1579: 1577: 1575: 1573: 1571: 1570: 1567:"Newsletters" 1566: 1564: 1557: 1555: 1553: 1550: 1547: 1544: 1540: 1537: 1530: 1525: 1522: 1518: 1516: 1512: 1509: 1506: 1501: 1498: 1494: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1480: 1478: 1475: 1472: 1469: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1458: 1453: 1451: 1449: 1446: 1444: 1442: 1439: 1437: 1435: 1433: 1431: 1429: 1427: 1424: 1422: 1420: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1407: 1405: 1403: 1400: 1398: 1395: 1392: 1390: 1388: 1386: 1384: 1383: 1379: 1377: 1376: 1369: 1367: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1342: 1340: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1328: 1325: 1322: 1319: 1312: 1310: 1308: 1299: 1296: 1293: 1290: 1287: 1284: 1280: 1278: 1275: 1272: 1269: 1266: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1253: 1251: 1248: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1223: 1219: 1217: 1214: 1210: 1205: 1201: 1199: 1196: 1194: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1179: 1177: 1171: 1169: 1168: 1161: 1159: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1136:Kuril Islands 1131: 1129: 1124: 1121: 1120:brought it up 1117: 1114: 1110: 1107: 1103: 1102: 1095: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1072: 1070: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1044: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1029: 1026: 1023: 1021: 1019: 1017: 1015: 1013: 1011: 1008: 1005: 1003: 1001: 999: 996: 993: 990: 987: 984: 981: 978: 974: 970: 967: 965: 963: 960: 956: 952: 944: 942: 941: 937: 933: 929: 925: 921: 917: 910: 906: 904: 903: 899: 895: 891: 887: 883: 878: 876: 873: 869: 867: 864: 860: 855: 853: 851: 849: 846: 844: 841: 839: 837: 835: 833: 831: 829: 827: 825: 823: 821: 819: 816: 815:User:Qwyrxian 812: 810: 808: 806: 804: 796: 794: 793: 786: 784: 782: 778: 774: 764: 763: 758: 754: 748: 744: 740: 728: 727: 724: 721: 715: 712: 708: 698: 689: 687: 683: 676: 671: 667: 661: 655: 645: 643: 637: 635: 630: 626: 625: 624: 619: 615: 614: 610: 608: 607: 600: 598: 591: 589: 587: 578: 576: 571: 564: 556: 554: 553: 546: 544: 542: 538: 533: 531: 527: 522: 520: 515: 511: 505: 503: 499: 495: 485: 481: 477: 470: 469: 459: 454: 452: 447: 445: 440: 439: 437: 436: 431: 426: 425: 410: 409: 398: 395: 392: 388: 385: 383: 380: 379: 375: 370: 369: 361: 358: 356: 353: 350: 346: 341: 338: 336: 333: 330: 326: 323: 321: 318: 316: 313: 311: 308: 304: 299: 296: 295: 291: 286: 285: 277: 274: 272: 269: 266: 262: 259: 258: 254: 249: 248: 240: 237: 235: 232: 230: 227: 225: 224:Case requests 222: 220: 217: 216: 212: 207: 206: 199: 195: 192: 190: 187: 184: 180: 175: 173: 170: 168: 165: 163: 160: 157: 154: 150: 147: 146: 144: 143: 139: 135: 134: 131: 127: 123: 120: 115: 109: 104: 100: 95: 90: 86: 82: 78: 73: 67: 62: 56: 51: 45: 40: 31: 27: 23: 19: 3128: 3119: 3110: 3109: 3089: 3081: 3054: 3048: 3042: 3036: 3030: 3024: 3001: 2995: 2989: 2983: 2977: 2971: 2948: 2942: 2936: 2930: 2924: 2918: 2911:John Smith's 2893: 2887: 2881: 2875: 2869: 2863: 2830: 2824: 2818: 2812: 2806: 2800: 2784: 2758: 2752: 2746: 2740: 2734: 2728: 2670:incompetance 2646: 2635: 2618: 2613: 2584: 2555: 2495: 2487: 2462: 2453: 2452: 2444: 2435: 2428: 2404: 2379: 2370: 2361: 2339:Sea of Japan 2293: 2261: 2238: 2135: 2118: 2109: 2108: 2077: 2070: 2025: 2022:31 July 2011 1998: 1963: 1953: 1926: 1898: 1894: 1887: 1872:opinion only 1813: 1800: 1781: 1761: 1754: 1675: 1667: 1664: 1660: 1659: 1561: 1534: 1514: 1496:accusation). 1462: 1411: 1374: 1373: 1346: 1316: 1303: 1257: 1249: 1220: 1183: 1175: 1166: 1165: 1132: 1125: 1104: 1100: 1099: 1076: 1045: 958: 948: 913: 879: 856: 800: 791: 790: 770: 734: 716: 704: 695: 649: 641: 633: 622: 605: 604: 595: 582: 560: 551: 550: 534: 529: 523: 510:page history 506: 501: 493: 491: 479: 98: 84: 83: 81: 49: 2964:Phoenix7777 2552:statements. 2492:Bobthefish2 2401:Bobthefish2 2301:I refuted. 2061:Han-yi Shaw 2051:Lee Seokwoo 1929:confounding 1515:big tantrum 1265:this thread 1180:Bobthefish2 1077:Right here 977:user:Tenmei 194:Ban appeals 172:Noticeboard 114:Newyorkbrad 3093:Beeblebrox 3052:block user 3046:filter log 2999:block user 2993:filter log 2946:block user 2940:filter log 2891:block user 2885:filter log 2828:block user 2822:filter log 2756:block user 2750:filter log 1901:conflation 1842:verifiable 1672:Bad apples 959:mistakenly 773:filibuster 400:(pre-2016) 387:Statistics 320:Procedures 85:Case clerk 3058:block log 3005:block log 2952:block log 2897:block log 2834:block log 2776:POV-title 2762:block log 2610:happened. 2407:discussed 2389:. On the 1732:see also 1052:Oppose #5 920:WP:SOURCE 882:WP:SOURCE 570:POV-title 537:/Workshop 526:talk page 325:Elections 3028:contribs 2975:contribs 2922:contribs 2867:contribs 2856:Oda Mari 2804:contribs 2732:contribs 2721:Qwyrxian 2619:under 7% 2395:edit-war 2218:user:Nlu 2018:created 1820:factoids 1725:compare 1707:compare 961:blocked 926:", and " 914:In this 909:Oda Mari 888:", and " 777:example1 762:exhibit1 753:example1 726:example3 723:example2 720:example1 61:Workshop 50:Evidence 28:‎ | 24:‎ | 22:Requests 20:‎ | 3085:example 2693:WP:DIVA 2662:WP:NPOV 2179:Sarcasm 2143:Conduct 1867:FACTOID 1619:. When 1412:tactics 1356:WP:NPOV 1202:). The 928:WP:NPOV 916:section 890:WP:NPOV 749:, etc. 707:Twinkle 579:My view 397:Reports 335:History 315:Members 310:Contact 298:Discuss 162:(CU/OS) 2715:Others 2666:m:MPOV 2625:Tenmei 2470:WP:BRD 2466:WP:IAR 2414:, Bob 2358:Tenmei 2337:, and 2092:Tenmei 1937:Tenmei 1927:These 1641:Misc#2 1558:Tenmei 1360:WP:NOR 1254:Tenmei 1189:) and 1113:source 982:after 924:WP:NOR 886:WP:NOR 711:record 340:Clerks 198:Report 112:& 2793:Lvhis 2678:link2 2674:link1 2376:Lvhis 2201:Lvhis 1816:facts 1343:Lvhis 1149:Cla68 1083:Lvhis 1060:Lvhis 1034:Lvhis 932:Lvhis 907:User 894:Lvhis 498:diffs 484:diffs 374:Audit 16:< 3097:talk 3040:logs 3022:talk 3017:STSC 2987:logs 2969:talk 2934:logs 2916:talk 2879:logs 2861:talk 2816:logs 2798:talk 2744:logs 2726:talk 2658:WP:V 2647:must 2636:five 2569:link 2432:this 2367:STSC 2284:this 2096:talk 2090:. -- 2080:here 2065:here 2055:here 2041:here 2020:here 2010:here 1989:here 1985:here 1983:and 1981:here 1973:here 1941:talk 1881:B+? 1875:A+? 1837:FACT 1818:and 1678:here 1604:Misc 1414:are 1313:STSC 1224:and 1218:). 1153:talk 1087:talk 1081:. -- 1064:talk 1058:. -- 1038:talk 936:talk 922:", " 898:talk 884:", " 391:Talk 382:Talk 349:Talk 329:Talk 183:Talk 153:Talk 119:Talk 108:Talk 94:Talk 77:Talk 66:Talk 55:Talk 44:Talk 26:Case 2781:tag 2567:. ( 2480:). 2426:. 2347:ref 2343:BGN 2333:), 2331:ref 2132:SPA 1364:AGF 1358:or 1263:In 1204:WQA 994:of 688:). 514:log 265:Log 3099:) 3062:- 3009:- 2956:- 2901:- 2838:- 2779:}} 2773:{{ 2680:). 2676:, 2606:. 2298:. 2098:) 1991:). 1943:) 1851:B 1845:A 1481:: 1410:– 1329:, 1326:, 1323:, 1320:, 1300:). 1276:, 1247:. 1155:) 1089:) 1066:) 1040:) 938:) 900:) 877:. 854:. 813:. 783:. 755:- 745:, 741:, 588:. 573:}} 567:{{ 521:. 101:: 87:: 70:— 59:— 48:— 3095:( 3060:) 3055:· 3049:· 3043:· 3037:· 3031:· 3025:· 3020:( 3007:) 3002:· 2996:· 2990:· 2984:· 2978:· 2972:· 2967:( 2954:) 2949:· 2943:· 2937:· 2931:· 2925:· 2919:· 2914:( 2899:) 2894:· 2888:· 2882:· 2876:· 2870:· 2864:· 2859:( 2836:) 2831:· 2825:· 2819:· 2813:· 2807:· 2801:· 2796:( 2764:) 2759:· 2753:· 2747:· 2741:· 2735:· 2729:· 2724:( 2710:. 2695:. 2535:. 2529:. 2094:( 2043:. 1975:( 1939:( 1870:= 1840:= 1793:+ 1773:. 1742:+ 1730:+ 1723:+ 1717:+ 1705:+ 1699:+ 1693:+ 1625:. 1473:. 1270:. 1228:( 1151:( 1085:( 1062:( 1036:( 934:( 896:( 656:. 457:e 450:t 443:v 345:+ 303:+ 267:) 263:( 179:+ 121:) 117:( 110:) 106:( 96:) 92:( 79:) 75:( 68:) 64:( 57:) 53:( 46:) 42:(

Index

Knowledge:Arbitration
Requests
Case
Senkaku Islands
Main case page
Talk
Evidence
Talk
Workshop
Talk
Proposed decision
Talk
AlexandrDmitri
Talk
John Vandenberg
Talk
Newyorkbrad
Talk
Knowledge Arbitration

About arbitration
Talk
Arbitration policy
(CU/OS)
Guide to arbitration
Noticeboard

+
Talk
Search archived proceedings

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.