Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Čivićevac - Knowledge

Source 📝

362:
choose to search Knowledge for an arbitrary astronomical object is quite low. This is not a matter of dubious predictions; it is just common sense. Therefore, unlike Earth-based geographic features, the existence of an astronomical object, or even the fact that it has been named (see below) does not guarantee notability.
361:
However, unlike Earth-based geographic features, arbitrary astronomical objects are unlikely to be visited or run across by a general reader of Knowledge. Therefore, unless an astronomical object has significant coverage in the media or published sources, the likelihood that a general reader would
301:: Knowledge indeed "incorporates elements of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers", but these would normally still have to pass the general notability threshold. I say "normally" because there 166: 224:. I admit that the creek may not be independently notable, however, it is a verifiable geographical information. It could be redirected and mentioned in the article about the town. -- 160: 275:
says that Knowledge "incorporates elements of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers". This is a stream (not a creek or a canal) that is listed in
293:
This is not a bad argument... The Gazeteer also lists coordinates, thus providing at least one of the "basic facts" I was referring to. Still, it is my understanding that
466:
I thought about withdrawing the nomination, but I'm still not fully convinced and I'd like to hear more opinions. If not, this is going to be closed as "keep" anyway.
121: 221: 246: 126: 205:, illustrated by the fact that there are no reliable sources from which basic facts (such as e.g. length, source and mouth) could be established. 233: 199:
Is not a river, but rather a creek or a canal, depending on the source. Can't find elementary facts about it (e.g. its length). Lacks notability.
452:: should GregorB's "This is a good argument in favor of inclusion in this particular case" be taken as a withdrawal of the nomination? -- 319:
I'm inclined to think that WP:5 trumps GNG, myself. (Hence all the tiny places that have dedicated articles.) These five pillars are the
94: 89: 98: 305:
some gray areas: are all settlements, geographic features and minor planets inherently notable? Frankly, I'm not sure either way.
181: 425: 81: 148: 17: 457: 328: 284: 229: 142: 475: 461: 444: 412: 377: 332: 314: 288: 260: 237: 214: 63: 496: 40: 341:). Geographic features could be said to lie somewhere in between. This quote from WP:NASTRO is also interesting: 138: 453: 324: 280: 188: 225: 492: 439: 408: 36: 85: 337:
Sometimes it apparently does (settlements), and sometimes it apparently doesn't (minor planets, see
174: 154: 471: 373: 310: 256: 210: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
491:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
404: 393: 338: 201:
The prod was declined. Still, the fundamental problem remains, and that is failure to meet
77: 69: 294: 202: 59: 467: 369: 306: 252: 206: 115: 429: 298: 272: 396:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
433: 54: 368:
This is a good argument in favor of inclusion in this particular case.
485:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
111: 107: 103: 173: 403:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 321:fundamental principles by which Knowledge operates 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 499:). No further edits should be made to this page. 432:, whereby the encyclopedia also functions as a 187: 8: 247:list of Croatia-related deletion discussions 245:Note: This debate has been included in the 244: 197:Was prodded with the following rationale: 277:The Gazetteer of the Republic of Croatia 7: 220:I've added a source to the article: 24: 426:Knowledge:Notability (geography) 222:the official website of the town 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 516: 476:11:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 462:10:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 64:05:51, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 488:Please do not modify it. 445:19:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC) 413:00:02, 9 June 2012 (UTC) 378:10:16, 9 June 2012 (UTC) 333:12:42, 8 June 2012 (UTC) 315:09:44, 8 June 2012 (UTC) 289:19:42, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 261:15:34, 2 June 2012 (UTC) 238:14:34, 2 June 2012 (UTC) 215:14:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC) 52:. sufficient consensus 32:Please do not modify it. 428:and per Knowledge's 454:Andreas Philopater 325:Andreas Philopater 281:Andreas Philopater 48:The result was 443: 415: 263: 250: 507: 490: 442: 440:Northamerica1000 437: 402: 398: 251: 192: 191: 177: 129: 119: 101: 34: 515: 514: 510: 509: 508: 506: 505: 504: 503: 497:deletion review 486: 438: 391: 134: 125: 92: 76: 73: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 513: 511: 502: 501: 481: 480: 479: 478: 447: 418: 417: 416: 400: 399: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 366: 365: 364: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 265: 264: 241: 240: 195: 194: 131: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 512: 500: 498: 494: 489: 483: 482: 477: 473: 469: 465: 464: 463: 459: 455: 451: 448: 446: 441: 435: 431: 427: 423: 420: 419: 414: 410: 406: 401: 397: 395: 390: 389: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 340: 336: 335: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 317: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 291: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 270: 267: 266: 262: 258: 254: 248: 243: 242: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 218: 217: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 123: 117: 113: 109: 105: 100: 96: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 74: 71: 68: 66: 65: 61: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 487: 484: 449: 430:Five pillars 421: 392: 360: 320: 302: 276: 268: 198: 196: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 405:Ron Ritzman 226:Vejvančický 161:free images 493:talk page 434:gazetteer 339:WP:NASTRO 253:• Gene93k 78:Čivićevac 70:Čivićevac 37:talk page 495:or in a 394:Relisted 234:contribs 122:View log 39:or in a 468:GregorB 370:GregorB 307:GregorB 297:trumps 207:GregorB 167:WP refs 155:scholar 95:protect 90:history 424:- Per 295:WP:GNG 203:WP:GNG 139:Google 99:delete 450:Query 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 116:views 108:watch 104:links 60:talk 16:< 472:talk 458:talk 422:Keep 409:talk 374:talk 329:talk 323:. -- 311:talk 299:WP:5 285:talk 279:. -- 273:WP:5 269:Keep 257:talk 230:talk 211:talk 175:FENS 149:news 112:logs 86:talk 82:edit 50:keep 303:are 189:TWL 124:• 120:– ( 55:DGG 474:) 460:) 436:. 411:) 376:) 331:) 313:) 287:) 271:. 259:) 249:. 236:) 232:| 213:) 169:) 114:| 110:| 106:| 102:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 62:) 470:( 456:( 407:( 372:( 327:( 309:( 283:( 255:( 228:( 209:( 193:) 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 133:( 130:) 118:) 80:( 58:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
DGG
talk
05:51, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Čivićevac
Čivićevac
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:GNG
GregorB

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.