Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/¡Tré! - Knowledge

Source 📝

234:
I think it's clear by the sources the album exists in some fashion and will be publicly available in a few short months. While the "word-for-word" thing is a problem, it's also easily corrected. I believe this article passes the necessary policies (WP:GNG, WP:N, WP:NALBUM) to continue to exist. The
331:
for now. The album is definitely scheduled for release, and some details are known about it (cover art, names of a couple tracks) but it's still too soon to have a stand-alone article. As the release draws closer one expects more sources and info will become available, at which point it can be
301:
It's about time that both Tre and Dos have a wiki page, we know a lot about the albums already, even some of the songs have been confirmed, so there can be a partial track listing (just without numbers). For example we know 99 Revolutions is going to be on Tre as well as Stray Heart. The first
235:
album work has been released and was previously on the article prior to it's redirection, which I undid. In short, keep, it more than meets the necessary policies to be kept. Just needs a re-write to keep it from being a word-for-word copy of another article.
258:
No problem with changing words but can you add more info to differ the article, like 21st and AI are? Even if changed wording, the meaning remains the same as it is in UNO. It is impossible as there are no details available out there, right now.
302:
confirmed in an interview when they first announced the trilogy and the latter during the radio interview with Zane Lowe. Also in the end all three of the wiki pages will end up very similar anyway, and its just a starting ground right now.
361:
article. Understandable, but it also shows - along with no confirmed track listing - that there's little individual notability for ¡Tré! at this time, and that it'd be sensible to wait a bit for more specifics to emerge.
164: 199:
and there is no difference other then one or two lines which are either unsourced or unnecessary. Track listing is not released and nor has been any confirmation of songs from the album or singles. It is best to
408: 454:
This page has been cleaned up and now features a cover and tracklist so we should keep it being that is what we said was needed to keep it and it has the themes and styles added
119: 52:. It looks like there is consensus not to delete, but no consensus as to whether the article should be kept or merged. I suggest opening a merge discussion on the talk page. 158: 432:
we should either fix it up add a picture and have a short article on it or wait until after Dos comes out and make the article then and have it redirect for now
124: 479:. We got a title, release date, album cover and track listing for the album. More information will come in time, but this is enough for now. 179: 17: 146: 92: 87: 96: 79: 140: 506: 40: 390:. Until there's are tracklistings that are confirmed by the band themselves, Dos and Tre don't need articles. 278:
They're part of a trilogy all announced at once. A lot of the information will be the same, it is inevitable.
136: 487: 467: 445: 420: 399: 374: 341: 311: 307: 292: 269: 249: 225: 61: 262: 218: 186: 502: 455: 433: 395: 303: 57: 36: 337: 172: 152: 416: 212: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
501:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
391: 53: 83: 333: 285: 242: 201: 480: 365: 412: 113: 75: 67: 357:. Much of ¡Tré!'s "Recording and release" section is identical to that of the 387: 354: 328: 280: 237: 211:
for now. Though not failing GNG, it is clearly copy of other article. It is
207: 358: 196: 215:
and I can do much better with this once there are more details out.
495:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
195:
Whatever written here is clear copy of what I've written at
109: 105: 101: 171: 409:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 509:). No further edits should be made to this page. 185: 8: 407:Note: This debate has been included in the 406: 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 488:09:27, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 468:20:40, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 446:01:44, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 430:Either Redirect or Clean it Up 421:01:41, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 400:09:50, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 375:08:04, 24 September 2012 (UTC) 342:21:13, 23 September 2012 (UTC) 332:un-redirected and expanded. -- 312:11:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC) 293:07:12, 23 September 2012 (UTC) 270:07:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC) 250:06:57, 23 September 2012 (UTC) 226:06:51, 23 September 2012 (UTC) 62:20:46, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 1: 526: 498:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 48:The result was 423: 373: 517: 500: 485: 465: 460: 443: 438: 372: 369: 363: 288: 283: 265: 245: 240: 221: 190: 189: 175: 127: 117: 99: 34: 525: 524: 520: 519: 518: 516: 515: 514: 513: 507:deletion review 496: 481: 461: 456: 452:Strong Keep Now 439: 434: 367: 364: 286: 281: 263: 243: 238: 219: 132: 123: 90: 74: 71: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 523: 521: 512: 511: 491: 490: 473: 472: 471: 470: 425: 424: 403: 402: 377: 344: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 296: 295: 273: 272: 264:TheSpecialUser 253: 252: 220:TheSpecialUser 193: 192: 129: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 522: 510: 508: 504: 499: 493: 492: 489: 486: 484: 478: 475: 474: 469: 466: 464: 459: 453: 450: 449: 448: 447: 444: 442: 437: 431: 427: 426: 422: 418: 414: 410: 405: 404: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 378: 376: 371: 370: 360: 356: 352: 348: 345: 343: 339: 335: 330: 326: 323: 322: 313: 309: 305: 304:Cruiseshipfan 300: 299: 298: 297: 294: 291: 289: 284: 277: 276: 275: 274: 271: 268: 267: 266: 257: 256: 255: 254: 251: 248: 246: 241: 233: 230: 229: 228: 227: 224: 223: 222: 214: 210: 209: 203: 198: 188: 184: 181: 178: 174: 170: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 138: 135: 134:Find sources: 130: 126: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 497: 494: 482: 476: 462: 457: 451: 440: 435: 429: 428: 383: 379: 366: 350: 346: 324: 279: 261: 260: 236: 231: 217: 216: 206:redirect to 205: 194: 182: 176: 168: 161: 155: 149: 143: 133: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 392:Alec scheat 159:free images 54:Mark Arsten 213:WP:TOOSOON 503:talk page 413:• Gene93k 388:Green Day 368:Gongshow 355:Green Day 334:IllaZilla 329:Green Day 208:Green Day 204:this and 37:talk page 505:or in a 380:Redirect 347:Redirect 325:Redirect 120:View log 39:or in a 165:WP refs 153:scholar 93:protect 88:history 463:Dragon 441:Dragon 287:Head90 282:CRRays 244:Head90 239:CRRays 137:Google 97:delete 458:Black 436:Black 384:merge 359:¡Uno! 351:merge 197:¡Uno! 180:JSTOR 141:books 125:Stats 114:views 106:watch 102:links 76:¡Tré! 68:¡Tré! 16:< 477:Keep 417:talk 396:talk 338:talk 308:talk 232:Keep 202:salt 173:FENS 147:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 483:Zac 386:to 353:to 327:to 187:TWL 122:• 118:– ( 419:) 411:. 398:) 340:) 310:) 290:| 247:| 167:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 415:( 394:( 382:/ 349:/ 336:( 306:( 191:) 183:· 177:· 169:· 162:· 156:· 150:· 144:· 139:( 131:( 128:) 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Mark Arsten
talk
20:46, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
¡Tré!
¡Tré!
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
¡Uno!
salt

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.