413:. There isn't any problem in finding passing coverage like the one-liner mentioned in the book. The problem is finding active, in-depth courage about the event in Feb-March 2011 (not speculations about the middle east one happened earlier and how it will impact China, that is not an event and Knowledge's event policy does not cover speculations) after the initial burst. Has the event been described to have long time effect?--
300:: "Significant national or international coverage is usually expected for an event to be notable. Wide-ranging reporting tends to show significance, but sources that simply mirror or tend to follow other sources, or are under common control with other sources, are usually discounted." Coverage in Chinese include national and international medias: BBC, AOL, VOA, DW etc.--
446:
The one liner is for protests actually happened during 2011. The 3 pages followed are trying to rationalize the speculations rather than covering the protests. If you read the book again you would see the way it mention the protests is as one of the evidence that the government tightened up security
314:
I can only find passing coverage and cannot find a single case study after the initial coverage burst around March 2011. The original notability seems to be established based on similarity to notable events and diversity of sources, but the event does not seem to have a lasting coverage in
Chinese
169:
427:
Er, this is not a one-liner, this is at least three pages (presumably more but the preview cuts off). Not too bad considering how little time scholarly books have actually had to come out since the event.
204:"Notable events usually receive coverage beyond a relatively short news cycle. " It dosen't seems have been cited as a case study in multiple sources after the initial coverage has died down. --
163:
97:
92:
101:
124:
84:
283:"Notable events usually receive coverage beyond a relatively short news cycle. " Can you list some sources which were reported months after this protest finished? --
129:
263:
241:
315:
and
English media. Maybe one day academics will write it in how media speculations flop badly to establish the notability again, but right now, it fails
88:
184:
151:
80:
72:
496:
479:
456:
441:
422:
405:
381:
362:
309:
292:
277:
255:
232:
213:
66:
145:
358:
288:
209:
141:
437:
401:
220:
17:
335:
191:
492:
350:
316:
53:
515:
157:
40:
488:
59:
511:
475:
372:- The protests have significance to the time period and to China in general and are therefore notable.
201:
36:
323:
433:
397:
177:
452:
418:
331:
354:
284:
205:
305:
297:
273:
251:
228:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
510:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
471:
390:
379:
447:
in anticipation of Arab Spring's impact. This can hardly qualify as in-depth coverage.--
429:
393:
448:
414:
327:
301:
269:
247:
224:
118:
374:
353:, while the article meets all other guidelines, should the article be deleted?--
504:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
389:. Receiving continued coverage, including in scholarly books
470:
An important part of the history of contemporary China.
114:
110:
106:
176:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
518:). No further edits should be made to this page.
349:I have a question. If an article doesn't meet
190:
8:
262:Note: This debate has been included in the
240:Note: This debate has been included in the
264:list of Events-related deletion discussions
261:
242:list of China-related deletion discussions
239:
7:
219:Pls refer to the Chinese sources on
81:2011 Chinese pro-democracy protests
73:2011 Chinese pro-democracy protests
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
497:20:49, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
480:15:03, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
457:18:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
442:03:33, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
423:17:27, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
67:00:50, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
406:22:14, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
382:02:53, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
363:11:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
310:10:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
293:09:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
278:18:01, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
256:18:01, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
233:08:13, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
214:11:35, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
535:
487:per Roscelese and others.
338:) 19:01, 8 September 2012β
507:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
351:WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE
317:WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE
489:My very best wishes
48:The result was
340:
326:comment added by
280:
267:
258:
245:
54:non-admin closure
526:
509:
377:
339:
320:
268:
246:
195:
194:
180:
132:
122:
104:
62:
34:
534:
533:
529:
528:
527:
525:
524:
523:
522:
516:deletion review
505:
373:
321:
137:
128:
95:
79:
76:
60:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
532:
530:
521:
520:
500:
499:
482:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
384:
366:
365:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
295:
259:
236:
235:
223:: 120 items.--
202:WP:PERSISTENCE
198:
197:
134:
75:
70:
61:TheSpecialUser
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
531:
519:
517:
513:
508:
502:
501:
498:
494:
490:
486:
483:
481:
477:
473:
469:
466:
458:
454:
450:
445:
444:
443:
439:
435:
431:
426:
425:
424:
420:
416:
412:
409:
408:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
388:
385:
383:
380:
376:
371:
368:
367:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
347:
337:
333:
329:
325:
318:
313:
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
296:
294:
290:
286:
282:
281:
279:
275:
271:
265:
260:
257:
253:
249:
243:
238:
237:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
217:
216:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:According to
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
65:
64:
63:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
506:
503:
484:
467:
410:
386:
369:
322:β Preceding
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
58:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
472:ACEOREVIVED
164:free images
298:WP:DIVERSE
221:zh:δΈεθθθ±ι©ε½
512:talk page
430:Roscelese
394:Roscelese
270:β’ Gene93k
248:β’ Gene93k
37:talk page
514:or in a
449:Skyfiler
438:contribs
415:Skyfiler
402:contribs
336:contribs
328:Skyfiler
324:unsigned
125:View log
39:or in a
411:Comment
302:Nivekin
225:Nivekin
170:WPΒ refs
158:scholar
98:protect
93:history
375:Dismas
142:Google
102:delete
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
119:views
111:watch
107:links
16:<
493:talk
485:Keep
476:talk
468:Keep
453:talk
434:talk
419:talk
398:talk
387:Keep
370:Keep
359:talk
355:ηε°ζε
332:talk
306:talk
289:talk
285:ηε°ζε
274:talk
252:talk
229:talk
210:talk
206:ηε°ζε
178:FENS
152:news
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
50:keep
392:. β
192:TWL
127:β’
123:β (
52:. (
495:)
478:)
455:)
440:)
436:β
421:)
404:)
400:β
361:)
334:β’
308:)
291:)
276:)
266:.
254:)
244:.
231:)
212:)
172:)
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
56:)
491:(
474:(
451:(
432:(
428:β
417:(
396:(
378:|
357:(
330:(
319:.
304:(
287:(
272:(
250:(
227:(
208:(
196:)
188:Β·
182:Β·
174:Β·
167:Β·
161:Β·
155:Β·
149:Β·
144:(
136:(
133:)
121:)
83:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.