Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Cowboys–Packers rivalry - Knowledge

Source 📝

590:
though they can meet more often (if they finish in the same place in their divisions the previous season) or meet in the playoffs. Under the current scheduling rotation (since 2002), they have met only 12 times in 19 years (including two playoff meetings). Also, just because tams have been in the same league for 60+ years does not automatically make them rivals, as you assert. Many other teams have been in the NFL/NFC since 1960 that do not have rivalry pages with the Cowboys. Thank you for presenting the impressive list of sources from a wide array of sources including top national authorities on NFL coverage (such as CBS and the AP) and other national sources.
788:, provided these are incorporated into the article. These sources range from the local to the national level and establish that more than just a few reporters consider this to be a "rivalry." While I have concerns about the "longstanding" nature of the rivalry, since they have only played 37 games over the course of 60+ years and the teams have often gone multiple seasons at a time without playing each other, there are some notable meetings between the two and several other "rivalry" pages (across the NFL and other sports) have much less sources to go by establishing that a rivalry exists. 244:
enmity between the two teams, and none has been demonstrated here." Although content has been added recently to substantiate the periods when the two teams were each other's direct competition for titles and a couple of notable games between them, there is nothing to suggest that there is an actual rivalry between the teams where each of them looks for their matchups against the other when the schedule is released. When they meet each other, there is very little in the way of discussion about continuing a rivalry or igniting old hatreds. It's just another game in the NFL schedule. –
931:- while I hate the Cowboys, and am generally leery of "rivalry" articles of teams who are not in the same main entity (in college football that would be league, in MLB, the NFL, and the NHL it would be division - I can't speak to sports leagues in other countries, since I don't follow them), this is one which would meet the specifications of a rivalry. Successful clubs (which the Cowboys and Packers both have been over their histories), who play as frequently as they have in the post-season tend to develop rivalries among the players and their fans. Similar to the 320: 243:
Contested PROD. Originally proposed with the rationale "There is nothing here to suggest an actual rivalry between these two teams. The fact that they are both teams in the NFL, even in the same conference, means they are bound to play each other on a semi-regular basis, but a rivalry needs some true
896:
There are RS's calling it a rivalry but I don't think of it as a rivalry in the traditional sense. I think it's just the nature of two old teams having been in the same league for so long that they've been forced to play each other often. Does that form a rivalry? Regardless, there are sources that
589:
The "longstanding" and "same conference" argument are baseless. The two teams have only played 37 times, including the playoffs, over 61 seasons. This is three games in five years on average. Under the current schedule rotation, the two teams are only guaranteed to meet once every three seasons,
501:
In addition to the articles above, there are a number of print sources on Newspapers.com that reinforce the rivalry status (Knowledge Newspaper.com accounts no longer provide access to a large amount of these articles, so I can't clip links, see
526:(The Times Leader), and that's just a drop in the bucket of articles on Newspapers.com specifically referencing a rivalry existing. Note that these sources are from across the country, not just local or regional to Wisconsin or Dallas area. 212: 452:, although the article is in bad shape, that is not a reason to delete. I once was pretty hesitant about these "rivalry" pages, thinking that they only really should exist for clear and obvious, long-standing rivalries (i.e. 613:
appreciate the re-review. I'm not necessary saying that all teams that existed for long times are rivals, more importantly that they have been playing each other consistently (3 games in 5 years, as you mentioned)
746:. Even though the two teams aren't "rivals" in the traditional regular season/inter-conference sense, I believe there have been played enough significant games in NFL lore to consider it such. At least 5 with the 804:
I have incorporated all of the available sources that were presented here. Note that some of the Newspapers.com articles above were duplicates (the same Associated Press article posted in different newspapers).
423:, etc.). I get that the article right now is significantly under-developed, but that could very well be an editing issue, not necessarily a deletion issue. We already have rivalry articles for 435:, and this would appear at first blush to be of similar significance to at least the fist two of those, albeit with many of the significant meetings here occurring in the pre-Internet era. 206: 259: 301: 622:, for example). I think ten reliable sources specifically calling two teams who play each other as "rivals" is sufficient to establish notability, but respect your opinion. Cheers, 173: 857:
not a traditional divisional rivalry, but these teams have had enough significant meetings to establish the legitimacy of this rivalry, as demonstrated by Ejgreen's sources.
323:
does not provide much in establishing this game as a "rivalry" game. Just because teams have played in the playoffs several times does not automatically make them rivals.
485: 287: 146: 141: 150: 477: 133: 273: 120: 618:
that they have played in a number of notable games. There are a number of NFC teams that the Packers have played for years, but aren't considered rivals (
105: 489: 453: 227: 194: 570:, please take a look at this new information, if you can, and see if it is sufficient to alleviate your concerns about the article. Cheers, 481: 493: 419:. I dunno, I mean, these two teams do actually have a lot of memorable and significant playoff meetings between them (things like the 69: 137: 946: 923: 906: 897:
indicate it's a rivalry so weak keep and perhaps add the additional RS's found from this discussion to help bolster this article.
888: 871: 847: 818: 796: 771: 736: 717: 664: 636: 605: 584: 444: 411: 395: 374: 350: 331: 307: 293: 279: 265: 251: 75: 188: 100: 93: 17: 722:
Just a note, when these are added to the page, that would be about 16 reliable sources establishing notability for this topic.
184: 914:- There is a case to be made that this is a historic rivalry, even if it has abated to nothingness in the current period. 767: 532:
The rivalry was more dominant in the 60s and 90s, but just because it wasn't recent doesn't take away from its notability
428: 424: 234: 129: 81: 114: 110: 829: 747: 701: 420: 367: 697: 358:. No sourced evidence that this is an actual rivalry. Ultimately this is an essay, not an encyclopedia article. -- 963: 40: 932: 693: 763: 689: 681: 432: 200: 811: 754:, the 1995 NFC Championship, the Dez Bryant "No-Catch" Game, and the 2016 NFC Divisional game, as well as a 729: 657: 629: 577: 902: 705: 503: 596:
vote, it is a "weaker" delete as these reference are much better than what is there now (namely nothing).
959: 865: 64: 36: 677: 389: 713: 440: 346: 220: 843: 806: 781: 724: 652: 624: 572: 466:
Same conference? (so they have and will meet often) - Yes, both in the NFC and have met 37 times.
919: 898: 801: 790: 619: 610: 599: 547: 325: 89: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
958:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
858: 248: 59: 685: 884: 559: 384: 785: 709: 567: 563: 551: 473:, 3 NFC Championship games, met 8 times in the playoffs, The Dez Bryant "No-Catch Game" 436: 404: 342: 54: 936: 839: 759: 673: 915: 167: 490:"Aaron Rodgers' domination of Dallas has changed tune of Packers-Cowboys rivalry" 543: 478:"these two storied franchises have competed in some of the NFL's greatest games" 245: 880: 755: 538:
The article needs to be improved, but that doesn't mean it should be deleted.
555: 360: 751: 470: 879:. Arguments and coverage presented by Gonzo and Ejgreen are persuasive. 535:
I have provided 10(!) reliable sources in just 30 minutes of searching
476:
Reliable sources identifying the fact that a "rivalry" exists? - Yes:
762:
comeback. I believe the sources are also improving, as noted above.
486:"5 Most Memorable Games Of Green Bay Packers-Dallas Cowboys Rivalry" 708:, in addition to the sources that Gonzo fan2007 has already found. 516:
The latest 4 decades of huge games: Packers-Cowboys rivalry rich
954:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
832:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
482:"Let’s Admit That the Packers Are the Cowboys’ Top Rival Now" 650:
I have improved, copyedited and added 6 sources to the page.
494:"Cowboys, Packers set to resume storied playoff rivalry" 163: 159: 155: 260:
list of American football-related deletion discussions
219: 302:
list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions
838:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 382:not a major rivalry and it needs reliable sources. 319:per nom. The article is very poorly sourced and a 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 966:). No further edits should be made to this page. 456:). But now I look at them in the following lens: 300:Note: This discussion has been included in the 286:Note: This discussion has been included in the 272:Note: This discussion has been included in the 258:Note: This discussion has been included in the 506:for the preview of the results of the search): 524:Packers-Cowboys rivalry has lost some mystique 288:list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions 233: 8: 121:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 520:Long Packers-Cowboys rivalry renewed Sunday 512:Another big game in Packers-Cowboys rivalry 299: 285: 274:list of Texas-related deletion discussions 271: 257: 469:Notable games against each other - Yes, 454:Chicago Bears-Green Bay Packers rivalry 7: 508:Packers-Cowboys rivalry has history 24: 463:Longstanding? - Yes, 60 years old 341:page for non-existent rivalry. – 321:search of Cowboys Packers rivalry 106:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 848:04:02, 31 December 2020 (UTC) 819:18:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC) 797:16:27, 30 December 2020 (UTC) 780:per the sources presented by 772:15:08, 30 December 2020 (UTC) 737:23:28, 28 December 2020 (UTC) 718:23:06, 28 December 2020 (UTC) 665:22:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC) 637:21:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) 606:21:05, 28 December 2020 (UTC) 585:17:32, 28 December 2020 (UTC) 529:A few important points here: 445:17:52, 26 December 2020 (UTC) 412:02:55, 26 December 2020 (UTC) 396:05:31, 25 December 2020 (UTC) 375:06:52, 24 December 2020 (UTC) 351:14:39, 23 December 2020 (UTC) 332:11:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC) 308:03:03, 23 December 2020 (UTC) 294:03:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC) 280:03:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC) 266:03:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC) 252:00:49, 23 December 2020 (UTC) 947:03:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC) 924:18:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC) 907:22:26, 4 January 2021 (UTC) 889:06:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC) 872:23:16, 1 January 2021 (UTC) 756:Thanksgiving game from 1994 96:(AfD)? Read these primers! 76:10:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 983: 748:1966 NFL Championship Game 514:(Manitowoc Herald-Times), 484:(Texas Monthly magazine), 956:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 130:Cowboys–Packers rivalry 82:Cowboys–Packers rivalry 522:(Messenger-Inquirer), 94:Articles for deletion 933:49ers–Giants rivalry 592:While I stand by my 518:(Northwest Herald), 510:(Arizona Republic), 764:Malcolm L. Mitchell 496:(Associated Press). 55:(non-admin closure) 782:User:Gonzo_fan2007 676:with sources like 597: 363: 334: 868: 862: 850: 814: 758:with a memorable 732: 660: 632: 620:Arizona Cardinals 591: 580: 492:(Sporting News), 361: 314: 310: 296: 282: 268: 111:Guide to deletion 101:How to contribute 57: 974: 943: 940: 866: 860: 837: 835: 833: 817: 812: 809: 795: 793: 776:Vote changed to 735: 730: 727: 663: 658: 655: 635: 630: 627: 604: 602: 583: 578: 575: 429:Packers–Seahawks 425:Cowboys–Steelers 392: 387: 373: 330: 328: 238: 237: 223: 171: 153: 91: 72: 67: 62: 53: 34: 982: 981: 977: 976: 975: 973: 972: 971: 970: 964:deletion review 941: 938: 851: 828: 826: 808:« Gonzo fan2007 807: 805: 791: 789: 726:« Gonzo fan2007 725: 723: 654:« Gonzo fan2007 653: 651: 626:« Gonzo fan2007 625: 623: 600: 598: 574:« Gonzo fan2007 573: 571: 390: 385: 372: 359: 326: 324: 180: 144: 128: 125: 88: 85: 70: 65: 60: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 980: 978: 969: 968: 950: 949: 926: 909: 891: 874: 836: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 786:User:Ejgreen77 774: 741: 740: 739: 667: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 541: 540: 539: 536: 533: 527: 499: 498: 497: 480:(CBS Sports), 474: 467: 464: 458: 457: 447: 433:Cowboys–Texans 414: 398: 377: 366: 353: 312: 311: 297: 283: 269: 241: 240: 177: 124: 123: 118: 108: 103: 86: 84: 79: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 979: 967: 965: 961: 957: 952: 951: 948: 945: 944: 934: 930: 927: 925: 921: 917: 913: 910: 908: 904: 900: 895: 892: 890: 886: 882: 878: 875: 873: 869: 863: 856: 853: 852: 849: 845: 841: 834: 831: 820: 815: 810: 803: 800: 799: 798: 794: 787: 783: 779: 775: 773: 769: 765: 761: 760:Jason Garrett 757: 753: 749: 745: 742: 738: 733: 728: 721: 720: 719: 715: 711: 707: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 683: 679: 675: 671: 668: 666: 661: 656: 649: 646: 645: 638: 633: 628: 621: 617: 612: 609: 608: 607: 603: 595: 588: 587: 586: 581: 576: 569: 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 542: 537: 534: 531: 530: 528: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 500: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 475: 472: 468: 465: 462: 461: 460: 459: 455: 451: 448: 446: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 422: 418: 415: 413: 410: 409: 408: 402: 399: 397: 394: 393: 388: 381: 378: 376: 371: 370: 364: 357: 354: 352: 348: 344: 340: 337: 336: 335: 333: 329: 322: 318: 309: 306: 303: 298: 295: 292: 289: 284: 281: 278: 275: 270: 267: 264: 261: 256: 255: 254: 253: 250: 247: 236: 232: 229: 226: 222: 218: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 186: 183: 182:Find sources: 178: 175: 169: 165: 161: 157: 152: 148: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 126: 122: 119: 116: 112: 109: 107: 104: 102: 99: 98: 97: 95: 90: 83: 80: 78: 77: 74: 73: 68: 63: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 955: 953: 937: 928: 911: 899:HocusPocus00 893: 876: 854: 827: 802:Frank Anchor 792:Frank Anchor 777: 743: 669: 647: 615: 611:Frank Anchor 601:Frank Anchor 593: 548:Frank Anchor 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 449: 416: 406: 405: 400: 383: 379: 368: 355: 338: 327:Frank Anchor 316: 313: 305: 291: 277: 263: 242: 230: 224: 216: 209: 203: 197: 191: 181: 87: 58: 49: 47: 31: 28: 207:free images 861:EPRICAVARK 560:Royalbroil 488:(Forbes), 407:EPIC STYLE 960:talk page 894:Weak Keep 778:weak keep 710:Ejgreen77 568:Ejgreen77 564:777burger 552:Sabbatino 437:Ejgreen77 403:per nom. 343:Sabbatino 37:talk page 962:or in a 840:Missvain 830:Relisted 752:Ice Bowl 672:. Meets 471:Ice Bowl 421:Ice Bowl 174:View log 115:glossary 39:or in a 916:Carrite 648:Comment 417:Comment 213:WP refs 201:scholar 147:protect 142:history 92:New to 813:(talk) 750:, the 731:(talk) 704:, and 674:WP:GNG 659:(talk) 631:(talk) 594:delete 579:(talk) 544:PeeJay 431:, and 401:Delete 380:Delete 356:Delete 339:Delete 317:Delete 185:Google 151:delete 881:Cbl62 391:broil 386:Royal 228:JSTOR 189:books 168:views 160:watch 156:links 61:Mario 16:< 942:5969 939:Onel 929:Keep 920:talk 912:Keep 903:talk 885:talk 877:Keep 867:talk 855:Keep 844:talk 784:and 768:talk 744:Keep 714:talk 706:this 702:this 698:this 694:this 690:this 686:this 682:this 678:this 670:Keep 556:Kinu 504:here 450:Keep 441:talk 362:Kinu 347:talk 221:FENS 195:news 164:logs 138:talk 134:edit 66:Jump 50:keep 616:and 249:Jay 246:Pee 235:TWL 172:– ( 71:83! 935:. 922:) 905:) 887:) 870:) 846:) 816:@ 770:) 734:@ 716:) 700:, 696:, 692:, 688:, 684:, 680:, 662:@ 634:@ 582:@ 566:, 562:, 558:, 554:, 550:, 546:, 443:) 427:, 349:) 304:. 290:. 276:. 262:. 215:) 166:| 162:| 158:| 154:| 149:| 145:| 140:| 136:| 52:. 918:( 901:( 883:( 864:( 859:L 842:( 766:( 712:( 439:( 369:c 365:/ 345:( 315:* 239:) 231:· 225:· 217:· 210:· 204:· 198:· 192:· 187:( 179:( 176:) 170:) 132:( 117:) 113:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
(non-admin closure)
Mario
Jump
83!
10:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Cowboys–Packers rivalry

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Cowboys–Packers rivalry
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.