Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Column 8 - Knowledge

Source 📝

205:. Column 8 is a famous part of the SMH, but is in no way notable except in the context of the newspaper. The SMH article isn't very big so there's no article size-related reason to have this as a seperate article and the article does not provide any sources which assert the Column's notability as a seperate entity. This matter was discussed in April 2007 (see: 368:. Column 8 is a Sydney institution given its longevity and its pioneering role as a form of "talkback" from readers on topics too quirky or humorous for a formal letters page. Its notability is easily established but its existence and content are a subset of the existence and content of the parent newspaper. Both this and 209:) and the editors who opposed the merge have not subsequently improved the article or added any references which demonstrate that Column 8 is notable in isolation. From re-reading that discussion (in which I took part) it seems that the majority of participants supported the merge, though no consensus was reached. -- 389:
There's definitely the potential for a full-sized article on Column 8. But what we've got ain't it. A merge would be a good idea until the SMH is bursting at the seams. Deletion is definitely overkill, and can cause some pedians to get a bit grumpy.
121: 177: 158:
is an incredibly significant cultural instutition in Sydney. I must disagree with the deletion attempt. Sorry, I scrambled my password and can't login anymore. -
226:
The SMH does have some good features, invariably the articles they've lifted wholesale from London's Daily Telegraph, but this isn't one of them.
369: 159: 424:, as suggested above. It's an important part of the paper, but I don't think it has anything more than local notability on its own. 17: 206: 277: 352: 94: 89: 98: 59: 333:
self-references. As to notability, in my view, newspaper columns running for over 60 years are not that common.--
472: 444: 365: 273: 256: 129: 81: 49: 36: 471:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
317: 163: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
348: 244: 231: 214: 202: 312:. There's nothing notable about this column. The only refs are collections of the columns themselves. 151: 457: 433: 429: 416: 412: 399: 381: 356: 337: 321: 313: 301: 289: 264: 247: 235: 218: 192: 167: 141: 63: 377: 188: 227: 210: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
453: 395: 285: 137: 425: 408: 373: 260: 184: 85: 334: 298: 115: 449: 391: 281: 133: 54: 276:. It is not notable outside Sydney. If it is kept it should be renamed to 155: 77: 69: 407:
per Bduke. Only relevant in the context of the newspaper itself. --
372:
could easily be incorporated as subheadings in the main article.
465:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
305:(not from Sydney though I do read the SMH and Column 8!) 111: 107: 103: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 475:). No further edits should be made to this page. 178:list of Australia-related deletion discussions 207:Talk:The_Sydney_Morning_Herald#Merge_Column_8 8: 132:; move to merge failed to reach consensus. 347:with The Sydney Morning Herald article. 176:: This debate has been included in the 329:- references are no longer confined to 297:- notable column running since 1947 -- 278:Column 8 in the Sydney Morning Herald 243:Needs a better article, not a merge. 7: 370:Good Weekend (Sydney Morning Herald) 24: 128:Clearly non-notable outside of 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 458:23:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 434:11:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 417:07:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 400:02:04, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 382:01:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 357:01:23, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 338:03:20, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 322:00:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 302:00:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 290:00:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 265:22:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 248:13:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 236:12:28, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 219:10:51, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 193:10:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 168:10:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 142:07:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 64:04:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC) 492: 445:The Sydney Morning Herald 366:The Sydney Morning Herald 274:The Sydney Morning Herald 257:The Sydney Morning Herald 130:The Sydney Morning Herald 50:The Sydney Morning Herald 468:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 331:Sydney Morning Herald 203:Sydney Morning Herald 152:User:Ta bu shi da yu 349:Capitalistroadster 306: 195: 181: 483: 470: 304: 182: 172: 119: 101: 34: 491: 490: 486: 485: 484: 482: 481: 480: 479: 473:deletion review 466: 92: 76: 73: 62: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 489: 487: 478: 477: 461: 460: 437: 419: 402: 384: 359: 342: 341: 340: 314:Mostlyharmless 307: 292: 267: 250: 238: 221: 196: 170: 160:220.237.96.135 126: 125: 72: 67: 58: 46:Merge/Redirect 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 488: 476: 474: 469: 463: 462: 459: 455: 451: 447: 446: 441: 438: 435: 431: 427: 423: 420: 418: 414: 410: 406: 403: 401: 397: 393: 388: 385: 383: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 360: 358: 354: 350: 346: 343: 339: 336: 332: 328: 325: 324: 323: 319: 315: 311: 308: 303: 300: 296: 293: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 268: 266: 262: 258: 254: 251: 249: 246: 242: 239: 237: 233: 229: 225: 222: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 197: 194: 190: 186: 179: 175: 171: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 146: 145: 144: 143: 139: 135: 131: 123: 117: 113: 109: 105: 100: 96: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 74: 71: 68: 66: 65: 61: 57: 56: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 467: 464: 443: 439: 421: 404: 386: 361: 344: 330: 326: 309: 294: 269: 252: 245:Orderinchaos 240: 228:Nick mallory 223: 211:Nick Dowling 198: 173: 147: 127: 53: 45: 43: 31: 28: 426:Lankiveil 374:Euryalus 261:Longhair 255:-- into 185:Euryalus 156:Column 8 150:This is 122:View log 78:Column 8 70:Column 8 60:contribs 387:Comment 335:Matilda 327:Comment 299:Matilda 95:protect 90:history 450:Canley 409:bainer 392:Andjam 310:Delete 224:Delete 99:delete 442:into 440:Merge 422:Merge 405:Merge 364:with 362:Merge 345:Merge 282:Bduke 272:into 270:Merge 253:Merge 201:into 199:Merge 134:Jfire 116:views 108:watch 104:links 55:JERRY 16:< 454:talk 448:. -- 430:talk 413:talk 396:talk 378:talk 353:talk 318:talk 295:Keep 286:talk 280:. -- 259:. - 241:Keep 232:talk 215:talk 189:talk 174:Note 164:talk 148:Keep 138:talk 112:logs 86:talk 82:edit 180:. 120:– ( 48:to 456:) 432:) 415:) 398:) 380:) 355:) 320:) 288:) 263:\ 234:) 217:) 191:) 166:) 154:. 140:) 114:| 110:| 106:| 102:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 52:. 452:( 436:. 428:( 411:( 394:( 376:( 351:( 316:( 284:( 230:( 213:( 187:( 183:— 162:( 136:( 124:) 118:) 80:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
The Sydney Morning Herald
JERRY
contribs
04:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Column 8
Column 8
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
The Sydney Morning Herald
Jfire
talk
07:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
User:Ta bu shi da yu
Column 8
220.237.96.135
talk
10:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
list of Australia-related deletion discussions
Euryalus
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.