476:
has taken have been appropriate - it is reasonable to favor deletion in this case rather than a merge and act on that by creating an AfD nomination - but I just disagree and think that the content should be preserved as accessible to non-admins by merging into
175:
284:
308:
169:
130:
381:
I'm sorry if this came off as rude. I expect AfD nominators to follow procedure and I ask questions when I suspect it has not. Did you perform step C.4 of
485:, even if it is immediately deleted from the new article, so that it's still accessible to the average editor in the history of a non-deleted article. --
403:. I still don't believe this should be merged as significance to the Clojure project hasn't been provided. Why did you suspect that I didn't?
135:
421:
which has to do with notability for stand-alone article. Criteria for merging a fact in an existing article is more permissive. --
17:
103:
98:
68:
627:
575:
487:
252:
190:
107:
157:
56:
90:
673:
40:
246:(as there are for "Spring framework" or "CakePHP") and for example there isn't even a self-created entry on
151:
669:
36:
147:
650:
616:
598:
556:
510:
450:
430:
412:
394:
368:
354:
324:
300:
275:
219:
72:
183:
197:
312:
288:
64:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
668:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
625:
may now be deleted" as you said, they should continue with the half-completed merge steps. --
621:
Well, yes, but what I'm saying is that for whoever closes this AfD, instead of carrying out "
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
400:
382:
566:
612:
552:
446:
426:
408:
390:
364:
350:
215:
163:
94:
243:
570:
60:
124:
418:
207:
622:
608:
607:
Yes but that's not good form while the page is under AfD discussion here. --
548:
536:
524:
473:
442:
422:
404:
386:
360:
346:
211:
86:
78:
247:
345:
seems like an obvious solution here. Did this occur to the nominator? --
544:
528:
478:
338:
231:
51:
662:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
242:
ure community but there aren't enough searches to register on
523:
I have added the single sentence that is the entirety of
120:
116:
112:
182:
441:
be merged though. It is not a major part of
Clojure.
206:
I found no notability for this web framework. Fails
238:. It seems to spark interest within the small Clo
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
676:). No further edits should be made to this page.
573:, so it doesn't accidentally get re-created. --
285:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
309:list of Language-related deletion discussions
196:
8:
307:Note: This debate has been included in the
283:Note: This debate has been included in the
306:
282:
7:
24:
569:in a cut-and-paste merge is to
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
571:blank the page and redirect
693:
472:I think that the actions
665:Please do not modify it.
651:15:47, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
617:15:26, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
599:11:16, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
557:04:44, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
511:01:58, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
451:19:01, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
431:17:07, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
413:13:51, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
395:13:43, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
369:12:01, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
359:Do you have to be rude?
355:04:21, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
325:07:43, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
301:07:43, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
276:21:40, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
220:20:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
73:07:06, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
417:Because you cited
48:The result was
437:But I think this
327:
303:
57:non-admin closure
684:
667:
649:
647:
644:
638:
634:
630:
597:
595:
592:
586:
582:
578:
545:Clojure#Variants
509:
507:
504:
498:
494:
490:
399:I always follow
321:
318:
315:
297:
294:
291:
274:
272:
269:
263:
259:
255:
201:
200:
186:
138:
128:
110:
34:
692:
691:
687:
686:
685:
683:
682:
681:
680:
674:deletion review
663:
645:
642:
636:
632:
628:
626:
593:
590:
584:
580:
576:
574:
542:
520:
505:
502:
496:
492:
488:
486:
336:
319:
316:
313:
295:
292:
289:
270:
267:
261:
257:
253:
251:
143:
134:
101:
85:
82:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
690:
688:
679:
678:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
602:
601:
560:
559:
543:redirected to
540:
518:
514:
513:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
374:
373:
372:
371:
332:
329:
328:
304:
280:
279:
278:
204:
203:
140:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
689:
677:
675:
671:
666:
660:
652:
648:
641:
635:
624:
620:
619:
618:
614:
610:
606:
605:
604:
603:
600:
596:
589:
583:
572:
568:
564:
563:
562:
561:
558:
554:
550:
546:
538:
534:
532:
526:
522:
516:
515:
512:
508:
501:
495:
484:
482:
475:
471:
468:
467:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
415:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
397:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
370:
366:
362:
358:
357:
356:
352:
348:
344:
342:
335:
331:
330:
326:
322:
310:
305:
302:
298:
286:
281:
277:
273:
266:
260:
249:
245:
244:Google Trends
241:
237:
235:
229:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
217:
213:
209:
199:
195:
192:
189:
185:
181:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
149:
146:
145:Find sources:
141:
137:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
71:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
664:
661:
639:
631:
587:
579:
530:
517:
499:
491:
480:
469:
438:
340:
333:
264:
256:
239:
233:
227:
205:
193:
187:
179:
172:
166:
160:
154:
144:
63:
50:redirect to
49:
47:
31:
28:
643:andersnatch
591:andersnatch
539:may now be
503:andersnatch
268:andersnatch
170:free images
670:talk page
637:truthious
623:Compojure
585:truthious
567:next step
537:Compojure
525:Compojure
497:truthious
439:shouldn't
401:WP:BEFORE
383:WP:BEFORE
262:truthious
87:Compojure
79:Compojure
37:talk page
672:or in a
521:Redirect
248:Freecode
131:View log
39:or in a
541:deleted
470:Comment
176:WP refs
164:scholar
104:protect
99:history
61:Yunshui
52:Clojure
519:Delete
320:JAMMMY
296:JAMMMY
148:Google
108:delete
337:with
334:Merge
311:. ★☆
287:. ★☆
250:. --
230:with
228:Merge
191:JSTOR
152:books
136:Stats
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
613:talk
609:Kvng
565:The
553:talk
549:Kvng
547:. --
474:SL93
447:talk
443:SL93
427:talk
423:Kvng
419:WP:N
409:talk
405:SL93
391:talk
387:Kvng
385:? --
365:talk
361:SL93
351:talk
347:Kvng
314:DUCK
290:DUCK
216:talk
212:SL93
208:WP:N
184:FENS
158:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
533:ure
529:Clo
527:to
483:ure
479:Clo
343:ure
339:Clo
323:☆★
299:☆★
236:ure
232:Clo
198:TWL
133:•
129:– (
55:. (
615:)
555:)
535:.
449:)
429:)
411:)
393:)
367:)
353:)
317:IS
293:IS
218:)
210:.
178:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
59:)
646:≜
640:ᛔ
633:∮
629:≜
611:(
594:≜
588:ᛔ
581:∮
577:≜
551:(
531:j
506:≜
500:ᛔ
493:∮
489:≜
481:j
445:(
425:(
407:(
389:(
363:(
349:(
341:j
271:≜
265:ᛔ
258:∮
254:≜
240:j
234:j
214:(
202:)
194:·
188:·
180:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
150:(
142:(
139:)
127:)
89:(
69:水
67:
65:雲
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.