Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Comparison of webmail providers - Knowledge

Source 📝

339:
The data is of course not static: the place for a historical treatment of the features is the individual articles. (We have many such articles, for a few very highly notable ones such as operating systems, we do list historical data, but list articles like this are supposed to be a summary). RThis is exactly the right website for this kind of information, and it has been exactly the right place for it since the beginning--the coverage of such subjects is how we first became important.
358:
Hold on, Knowledge has traditionally had many list and comparison articles. What specifically is wrong with this one? And where is it written that a list/comparison is only allowed if the content is static? I don't think the nominator has sufficiently explained the reasoning for deletion and pointed
338:
This is not a directory; its a selective list-form article giving major properties or service most of which are notable (we should either write articles on the others or remove them, as usual). It's not consumer reports, because it doesn't rate them, and the basic purpose of CR is to do just that.
190:
This page is solely a link of services at websites. The data is not static, and not encyclopaedic as it reflects now and only now. I am not saying that it shouldn't be on a website somewhere, I am just saying that it is not for our encyclopaedia —
156: 376:
per above comments. There are many, many similar summaries on Knowledge. Apart from anything else, I found this page really useful, and I wouldn't know where else to look for such information.--
150: 117: 90: 85: 94: 77: 236: 286: 171: 138: 81: 400: 383: 368: 350: 328: 300: 277: 251: 227: 202: 59: 132: 73: 65: 17: 128: 273: 187:
Knowledge is not a directory Knowledge is not a guidebook Knowledge is not an indiscriminate collection of information
178: 323: 419: 40: 269: 144: 396: 197: 415: 36: 381: 247: 164: 392: 364: 296: 192: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
414:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
264: 56: 377: 319: 243: 346: 224: 360: 292: 111: 53: 313: 341: 212: 408:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107: 103: 99: 359:
to which policies the article's existence violates. --
163: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 422:). No further edits should be made to this page. 237:list of Websites-related deletion discussions 177: 8: 285:Note: This debate has been included in the 235:Note: This debate has been included in the 287:list of Lists-related deletion discussions 284: 234: 7: 24: 211:, Knowledge is not a directory. 74:Comparison of webmail providers 66:Comparison of webmail providers 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 401:02:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 384:12:21, 14 December 2011 (UTC) 369:16:44, 13 December 2011 (UTC) 351:05:30, 12 December 2011 (UTC) 329:04:54, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 60:03:09, 19 December 2011 (UTC) 301:19:26, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 278:11:42, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 252:08:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 228:06:24, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 203:05:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 439: 411:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 391:per above comments. 270:And Adoil Descended 48:The result was 327: 303: 290: 262:Knowledge is not 254: 240: 430: 413: 317: 291: 265:Consumer Reports 241: 221: 218: 215: 200: 182: 181: 167: 115: 97: 34: 438: 437: 433: 432: 431: 429: 428: 427: 426: 420:deletion review 409: 219: 216: 213: 196: 124: 88: 72: 69: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 436: 434: 425: 424: 404: 403: 386: 371: 353: 332: 331: 305: 304: 281: 280: 256: 255: 231: 230: 185: 184: 121: 68: 63: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 435: 423: 421: 417: 412: 406: 405: 402: 398: 394: 393:Ramaksoud2000 390: 387: 385: 382: 379: 375: 372: 370: 366: 362: 357: 354: 352: 348: 344: 343: 337: 334: 333: 330: 325: 321: 316: 315: 310: 307: 306: 302: 298: 294: 288: 283: 282: 279: 275: 271: 267: 266: 261: 258: 257: 253: 249: 245: 238: 233: 232: 229: 226: 222: 210: 207: 206: 205: 204: 201: 199: 194: 188: 180: 176: 173: 170: 166: 162: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 130: 127: 126:Find sources: 122: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 58: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 410: 407: 388: 373: 355: 340: 335: 312: 308: 263: 259: 208: 195: 193:billinghurst 189: 186: 174: 168: 160: 153: 147: 141: 135: 125: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 311:per nom. -- 151:free images 378:Shantavira 244:Tom Morris 416:talk page 293:• Gene93k 37:talk page 418:or in a 324:contribs 118:View log 52:. v/r - 39:or in a 361:Qwerty0 198:sDrewth 157:WP refs 145:scholar 91:protect 86:history 309:Delete 260:Delete 209:Delete 129:Google 95:delete 347:talk 314:Legis 172:JSTOR 133:books 112:views 104:watch 100:links 16:< 397:talk 389:Keep 374:Keep 365:talk 356:Keep 336:Keep 320:talk 297:talk 274:talk 248:talk 225:Talk 165:FENS 139:news 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 342:DGG 179:TWL 116:– ( 399:) 367:) 349:) 322:- 299:) 289:. 276:) 268:. 250:) 239:. 223:| 159:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 395:( 380:| 363:( 345:( 326:) 318:( 295:( 272:( 246:( 242:— 220:P 217:I 214:J 183:) 175:· 169:· 161:· 154:· 148:· 142:· 136:· 131:( 123:( 120:) 114:) 76:( 57:P 54:T

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
T
P
03:09, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Comparison of webmail providers
Comparison of webmail providers
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
billinghurst
sDrewth
05:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.