Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Construction (RuneScape)/Archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

423:; why do we have a separate article for an individual skill? And why is Construction so special that it gets its own article? It should be cut down and linked to official RuneScape.com pages whilst we're at it. </onlylvl1constructioncauseihaventgotenoughmoney: --> 435:- Surely the Runescape Skills page is far to big to have all of the separate skills pages merged into it? The skills page should be left for a more vague overlook, and the separate pages kept for more intricate details about the skill. I know that 528:. Unless you meant your comment for that AfD, I think you are mistaken. Also, what does the fact that somebody tried to do a massive deletion months ago, long before the RuneScape wiki was up and running have to do with this deletion itself? -- 362:. Not game-guidey in the least, simply defines sections of one's potential house. Finally, it has been decided to temportally keep the RS wiki and this disconnected. I can see mining/fishing/Woodcutting going as reasonable, because they follow 588:
Note: Please do not vote to Merge as previously, many sections were split to shorten the article, as the editors were informed the article was too long. For this reason, many smaller skill articles popped up, and these articles are being shot
167:. There's nothing here that can be sensibly merged. And there's almost never a reason to redirect from a disambiguated title, especially a specific disambiguation like (RuneScape) as opposed to a general one like (author). 378:
Runescape skills, this Construction skill included, have enough information to justify having an article on Knowledge because of the amount of players of Runescape that could benefit from the information featured within --
287:
a game guide. The facts that 'it's too big to merge' should never be carte blanche for an article that violates one of the main principles of Knowledge to be permitted. As the article already has been merged into
472:- Keep for all the reasons above. Biggest addition to the game since I don't know when. Much too large and important to merge. Has its own history of delay and controversy. Keep, keep, keep. Please. 21: 391:
Is an important skill in RuneScape, and there is too much information to merge into the RuneScape article. It needs a bit of a minor clean-up but is not overly like a game guide -
78: 52:. Whether this should be kept or merged is a debate that can be done outside of AfD, though consensus here suggests that the article should be kept as is rather than merged. 74: 485: 576:
too much info to be merged: important information: deserves article as much as every other article in Knowledge: suggestor seems to have a disdain for RunesScape.-
509: 328:
That's a tad misleading, the skills articles gives a brief summary of construction, it is not a merge, it points to construction as the "main article".
407:
a much more complex and important skill than any previous, contains information not suited to RuneScape article or general skills article
237: 593: 568: 550: 537: 492: 476: 464: 427: 411: 399: 383: 370: 350: 332: 314: 275: 263: 213: 194: 182: 152: 125: 101: 61: 120: 168: 17: 542:
Five months ago. That is not a long time on my books. Besides,I keep my view of it being void and if not void I will vote for
484:
The afd lister is seeming to go for all RuneSCape articles, one by one. This is void as a deletion on the whole lot got
115: 609: 40: 249: 82: 608:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
67: 39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
233: 56: 439:, but these pages are not necessarily part of a a game guide, more an encycopaedic information source. // 392: 229: 179: 521: 533: 517: 442: 424: 225: 176: 97: 513: 408: 148: 525: 347: 577: 547: 489: 53: 33:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
190:
It's got a lot of information and I feel that the RuneScape Skills page is already jumbled.--
420: 358:
New skill, more sophisticated than prev. skills and it has MUCH more to come, can't fit in
329: 289: 272: 210: 164: 157: 134: 111: 529: 308: 93: 564:
per above. POH is a very important feature in RuneScape, and it deserves its own article.
366:
for every action. This skill is varied in methods, and is much more complex then those.
473: 380: 191: 143: 253: 86: 590: 436: 367: 284: 209:
to RuneScape Skills. Any stuff already a part of Skills will have to be deleted =(.--
565: 505: 260: 221:
A lot of other skills have their own page, and this skill is quite a large one.
293: 359: 602:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
292:, any and all merge votes should be considered to be deletes. 504:. I don't know how anybody would say that, given that it was 79:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Fishing (RuneScape)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 75:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mining (RuneScape) 200:Note that the user only edits RuneScape articles. 612:). No further edits should be made to this page. 271:It is too large to merge with runescape skills. 8: 165:a fully fleshed-out section on construction 81:, should be deleted and transwikied to the 7: 28: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 437:Knowledge is not a game guide 169:Knowledge is not a game guide 48:The result of the debate was 488:and got decided to be kept. 629: 583:02:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 252:with more content on the 195:19:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 183:10:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 153:09:30, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 126:08:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 102:07:49, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 605:Please do not modify it. 594:20:09, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 569:20:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 551:18:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 538:17:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 493:17:37, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 477:17:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 465:15:07, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 428:14:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 412:08:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 400:07:49, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 384:03:28, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 371:00:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 351:15:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC) 333:14:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC) 315:11:52, 3 July 2006 (UTC) 276:07:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC) 264:22:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 214:20:24, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 68:Construction (RuneScape) 62:21:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 36:Please do not modify it. 22:Construction (RuneScape) 248:- there is already an 110:anything important to 482:IMO, Deletion void... 518:Crafting (RuneScape) 395:• The Giant Puffin • 514:Cooking (RuneScape) 526:Prayer (RuneScape) 578:User:Merlin Storm 522:Magic (RuneScape) 313: 242: 228:comment added by 201: 151: 620: 607: 463: 460: 454: 448: 421:RuneScape skills 397: 346:per Lamentation 311: 307: 296: 290:RuneScape Skills 241: 222: 199: 158:RuneScape skills 147: 135:RuneScape skills 123: 112:RuneScape skills 38: 628: 627: 623: 622: 621: 619: 618: 617: 616: 610:deletion review 603: 459: 455: 453: 449: 447: 443: 440: 425:CaptainVindaloo 393: 309: 294: 223: 121: 71: 41:deletion review 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 626: 624: 615: 614: 598: 597: 581: 580: 571: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 496: 495: 479: 467: 457: 451: 445: 430: 414: 402: 386: 373: 353: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 318: 317: 278: 266: 243: 216: 204: 203: 202: 185: 155: 128: 70: 65: 46: 45: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 625: 613: 611: 606: 600: 599: 596: 595: 592: 586: 585: 584: 579: 575: 572: 570: 567: 563: 560: 559: 552: 549: 545: 541: 540: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 500: 499: 498: 497: 494: 491: 487: 483: 480: 478: 475: 471: 468: 466: 462: 461: 438: 434: 431: 429: 426: 422: 418: 415: 413: 410: 406: 403: 401: 398: 396: 390: 387: 385: 382: 377: 374: 372: 369: 365: 364:one procedure 361: 357: 354: 352: 349: 348:Percy Snoodle 345: 342: 341: 334: 331: 327: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 316: 312: 306: 305: 301: 297: 291: 286: 282: 281:Strong delete 279: 277: 274: 270: 267: 265: 262: 258: 256: 251: 247: 244: 239: 235: 231: 230:86.143.160.14 227: 220: 217: 215: 212: 208: 205: 198: 197: 196: 193: 189: 186: 184: 181: 178: 174: 170: 166: 163: 159: 156: 154: 150: 146: 145: 140: 136: 132: 129: 127: 124: 119: 118: 113: 109: 106: 105: 104: 103: 99: 95: 91: 89: 84: 80: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 60: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 37: 31: 30: 23: 19: 604: 601: 587: 582: 573: 561: 548:J.J.Sagnella 543: 510:Runecrafting 501: 490:J.J.Sagnella 481: 469: 441: 432: 417:Strong Merge 416: 404: 394: 388: 375: 363: 355: 343: 325: 303: 299: 298: 280: 268: 254: 245: 218: 206: 187: 172: 161: 142: 141:the rest. -- 138: 133:whatever to 130: 116: 107: 87: 72: 57: 54:Deathphoenix 49: 47: 35: 32: 512:along with 508:who listed 506:User:Ixfd64 470:Strong Keep 433:Strong Keep 356:Speedy Keep 330:Englishrose 273:Englishrose 224:—Preceding 211:Death motor 177:Lamentation 149:talk. o.o;; 530:Ricky81682 94:Ricky81682 474:Xela Yrag 360:RuneScape 255:RuneScape 192:Cool Spy0 144:Coredesat 88:RuneScape 591:p00rleno 458:adiators 409:Nathan M 368:p00rleno 238:contribs 226:unsigned 160:already 20:‎ | 502:Comment 486:debated 326:Comment 250:article 122:TaLk?!? 85:on the 83:article 566:Dtm142 524:, and 381:Robbie 344:Delete 285:WP:NOT 261:Ixfd64 246:Delete 173:Delete 139:delete 589:down. 419:into 295:Proto 257:Wikia 207:Merge 131:Merge 108:Merge 92:. -- 16:< 574:Keep 562:Keep 544:keep 534:talk 405:Keep 389:Keep 376:Keep 310:type 269:Keep 259:. -- 234:talk 219:Keep 188:Keep 98:talk 90:wiki 77:and 73:Per 50:Keep 175:. — 171:. 162:has 117:TBC 546:. 536:) 520:, 516:, 452:ot 446:ed 283:- 240:) 236:• 180::( 137:, 114:-- 100:) 532:( 456:R 450:H 444:R 304:/ 302:/ 300:/ 232:( 96:( 58:ʕ

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
Construction (RuneScape)
deletion review
Deathphoenix
ʕ
21:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Construction (RuneScape)
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mining (RuneScape)
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Fishing (RuneScape)
article
RuneScape wiki
Ricky81682
talk
07:49, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
RuneScape skills
TBC
TaLk?!?
08:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
RuneScape skills
Coredesat
talk. o.o;;
09:30, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
RuneScape skills
a fully fleshed-out section on construction
Knowledge is not a game guide
Lamentation
:(
10:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Cool Spy0
19:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.