529:. It appears to be an award at the national or international level; the question is whether it's a "highly prestigious" award as required by #C2. It does appear to be the top educational award of the SMB (their other awards are for service or research). Since it's an educational award, we can look at whether it's given for the kind of high achievement in education that would also pass #C4, or for lower-level work. The citation says that it's for her creation of an open-access web hub for educational materials (QUBES), for local mentorship, and for being the co-editor of an edited volume, among which only QUBES looks potentially significant to me. There's also some nontrivial (but non-independent) coverage of QUBES at
526:. She also does not pass #C3, as her doctoral fellowship, teaching-development fellowship, and leadership-institute fellowship are not the kinds of fellows described in that criterion (major scholarly societies for which fellowship is a highly selective honor). They look more like financial support for students and certificate of attendance in teaching and leadership programs than like honors for high scholarly achievement. So the only remaining question is whether she passes #C2 for the John Jungck Prize for Excellence in Education
94:
1024:. Since this AfD has been subject to canvassing on Twitter it should be closed by an experienced administrator. The BLP seems to have been an outcome of an inadequately supervised editathon. The advice given should be always go first for the low hanging fruit i.e. those candidates whose notability is so well established that blowback will not occur, as it has in this case.
602:. Co-Founder of Qubes, first of its kind Open Educational Resource hub, making a major contribution to STEM education. Especially relevant in this time of pandemic (satisfies criteria 3&4.) Member of two under-represented groups in STEM: women and Latinx, notable w/o academic criteria. Nationally recognized, featured communicator at Mathematics Association of America
999:. That leaves criterion 6: "The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity." I'm guessing this is where the users discussing Math Mamas are making their case? However I haven't been able to find independent coverage/sources indicating the impact of this organization or what the organization actually is. There was
1051:, one of the most prominent living mathematical biologists. #C4 Diaz Eaton's work towards redesigning undergraduate quantitative mathematical biology education (through QUBES and other initiatives) has affected higher education at large, several institutions, and the field of mathematical biology and has been strongly supported by the
1101:- The content is interesting, substantial and verifiable, but fails a narrow pass/fail reading of WP:PROF. Since the article is close to the line and the subject seems well-placed professionally, I'm inclined to be generous and hope that the article improves as her career advances to reach notability.
761:
Do you have some independent sources for what the Math Mamas project is/does and that confirm the national prominence of the project? I tried to find background and sources using google search/google news and wasn't successful, but would be happy to take a look if you could point them out. Currently
994:
For the subject, I don't see the independent media coverage to meet the GNG standard, and looking at academic notability criteria, 3-6 and 8 clearly don't apply. Others have pointed out the lack of evidence for criterion 1. Mathematics is a low(er) citation field, but being an associate professor
781:
Agree with above Impact Factor has a bias that places like
Knowledge can choose to enhance or work around. I think she meets notability requirements for founding of Math Mamas and her work founding QUBES which can be amplified in the article.
1046:
is arguably the most important professional society in her field and she won the third ever John Jungck Prize for
Excellence in Education award, which is the only award for outstanding teaching they have. The inaugural winner was
1055:
and others. #C7 Her work, teaching, and advocacy have taken center stage in prominent issues in mathematics education and the mathematics community, such as diversity initiatives, quantitative literacy, and misinformation. -
724:
editorial board combined with a national teaching award is a clear profile of a notable collegiate mathematics teacher. As Dany_waller notes, Diaz Eaton's teaching expertise has also been recognized by general media
339:
638:
None of those things are notability criteria. And it is irrelevant whether the impact factor is too low to pass notability or too unreliable to be used; either way we have no evidence of notability from it.
412:
388:
605:. FWIW: Google Scholar is a black box and as a librarian I don't find it reliable by itself. Impact factor measurements are also notoriously unreliable, especially for women and minorities. -
736:
A position on an editorial board is something true of most academics and useless for distinguishing the notable ones. A position as editor-in-chief would indicate notability through
101:
333:
995:
with an h-index of 3 still don't qualify. For criterion 2, her most significant award appears to be the John Jungck Prize for
Excellence in Education, which appears to be
499:
292:
670:
666:. Notable due to underrepresentation of women in math and relevant to criteria 1 and 4. Has been interviewed for notable media outlets including Washington Post
56:
is rather subjective, so there is a healthy amount of disagreement over whether she clears the bar based on individual editors' interpretation of the guideline.
762:
the page only cites the subjects profile page at her employ to support the existence/significance of this project and the role of the subject in the project.
579:
720:
is the highest profile journal for teaching of mathematics by mathematicians (as opposed to education journals focused on K-12 teaching). A position on the
239:
667:
224:
960:
Let's not ding the subject or the AfD for her lack of
Knowledge knowledge. All I see is a woman who has no idea how this works asking questions like
299:
552:). There is some media coverage, but mostly local, of a 380K$ grant for open education in QUBES/SCORE, but this is not sufficient for GNG.--
265:
260:
269:
67:
252:
946:
That twitter thread also makes clear that the creation of the article involves significant levels of self-promotion by the subject. —
698:
110:
1043:
702:
631:
140:
72:
530:
354:
219:
212:
17:
321:
663:
850:. Borderline for the award. Simply being on a board isn't really a sufficient reason, and academic track record is a bit
444:
439:
Sort of agree with nom. Only think is she is a director of Qubes, but how notable this is to meet nprof. I don't know.
1052:
627:
233:
229:
126:
1012:
767:
315:
99:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
1133:
461:
40:
842:
Just to note that looks like this was mentioned on the subject's
Twitter feed, but I don't think it's a case of
532:. It doesn't look like enough to me, but with better sourcing of QUBES I could be convinced to change my mind. —
1116:
1093:
1065:
1033:
1016:
976:
955:
951:
941:
911:
893:
867:
834:
830:
816:
791:
771:
749:
745:
685:
648:
644:
614:
591:
570:
541:
537:
511:
507:
490:
465:
448:
428:
421:
404:
397:
380:
77:
62:
311:
550:
730:
440:
486:
256:
172:
1004:
846:. Ignoring that, I'm uncertain as to notability, leaning slightly towards weak keep for QUBES work under
361:
1129:
1061:
1008:
863:
763:
694:
681:
36:
1105:
raises a valid BLP maintenance concern: in the first instance, I am inclined to prune the article. —
1029:
907:
843:
812:
478:
457:
156:
130:
947:
826:
741:
640:
533:
503:
416:
392:
347:
115:
57:
825:
not notable as an academic, Qubes could be but the sources provided so far just do not show that.
804:
787:
756:
726:
587:
162:
93:
921:
327:
1074:
934:
886:
851:
562:
482:
248:
208:
83:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1128:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1112:
1086:
1057:
969:
961:
876:
template on this page as a heated
Twitter conversation is running in parallel to this AfD.--
859:
690:
677:
474:
373:
1102:
1025:
965:
917:
903:
855:
808:
623:
610:
1085:. Its better to take a step back and improve the article IMHO, than summarily delete it.
800:
737:
523:
53:
1078:
847:
783:
583:
1048:
1000:
926:
878:
554:
190:
178:
146:
286:
125:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
1106:
370:
Potentially non-notable mathematician. Very low h-index, very low paper cites.
1082:
673:
619:
606:
662:, a unique community for women in mathematics with children sponsored by the
996:
527:
997:
a rather newly created prize where the suject is only the 3rd recipient
603:
456:
an early career mathematician who does not meet notability guidelines.
924:
which also has at least one personal attack against the nominator.--
968:
not to edit her own entry. So "heated" is a matter of perspective.
1042:. Mathematics is a field with notoriously low h-indexes. #C2: The
1007:
but where the subject is not listed on the editors or about page.
1124:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
88:
413:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
389:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
119:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
282:
278:
274:
549:. Associate professor since 2018 with a h-index of 3 (
346:
1003:
where the subject was one of several co-editors, and
964:
was alluding to. The thread also has a
Twitter user
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1136:). No further edits should be made to this page.
578:Note: This discussion has been included in the
500:list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions
498:Note: This discussion has been included in the
411:Note: This discussion has been included in the
387:Note: This discussion has been included in the
360:
139:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
109:among Knowledge contributors. Knowledge has
8:
1005:a recently launched blog with the same title
672:which also satisfies criteria 7. Agree with
240:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
580:list of Women-related deletion discussions
577:
497:
410:
386:
113:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
133:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
676:regarding impact factor measurements. -
477:is apt in his rationale & also per
740:but she does not have that position. —
7:
24:
716:project has national prominence.
522:. I agree that she does not pass
1044:Society for Mathematical Biology
225:Introduction to deletion process
92:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
799:with regret. Just not passing
1:
664:American Mathematical Society
129:on the part of others and to
1001:a special issue of a journal
1053:National Science Foundation
733:) 15:33, 27 Jun 2020 (UTC)
215:(AfD)? Read these primers!
1153:
52:. Some of the criteria in
1066:17:25, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
1034:22:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
1017:16:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
956:16:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
942:12:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
912:11:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
894:10:36, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
868:09:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
835:09:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
817:22:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
792:16:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
772:17:00, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
750:16:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
686:14:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
649:16:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
615:14:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
592:01:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
571:06:56, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
542:21:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
512:21:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
491:21:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
466:21:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
449:21:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
429:20:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
405:20:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
381:20:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
1126:Please do not modify it.
1117:20:00, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
1094:17:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
1077:are valid, I agree with
977:17:38, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
78:06:57, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
902:could you give a link?
171:; accounts blocked for
141:single-purpose accounts
111:policies and guidelines
658:. Project director of
1073:: Although issues of
703:few or no other edits
669:and Science Magazine
632:few or no other edits
213:Articles for deletion
705:outside this topic.
634:outside this topic.
922:this twitter thread
123:by counting votes.
102:not a majority vote
1071:Keep & improve
441:Davidstewartharvey
1115:
706:
635:
594:
514:
458:John Pack Lambert
431:
407:
249:Carrie Diaz Eaton
230:Guide to deletion
220:How to contribute
204:
203:
200:
127:assume good faith
84:Carrie Diaz Eaton
1144:
1111:
1091:
1009:MoneciousTriffid
974:
940:
929:
892:
881:
764:MoneciousTriffid
760:
688:
617:
569:
565:
557:
426:
419:
402:
395:
378:
376:
365:
364:
350:
302:
290:
272:
210:
198:
186:
170:
154:
135:
105:, but instead a
96:
89:
34:
1152:
1151:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1134:deletion review
1108:Charles Stewart
1103:User:Xxanthippe
1087:
970:
937:
932:
927:
918:User:Xxanthippe
889:
884:
879:
754:
563:
560:
555:
479:Johnpacklambert
422:
417:
398:
393:
374:
372:
307:
298:
263:
247:
244:
207:
188:
176:
160:
144:
131:sign your posts
87:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1150:
1148:
1139:
1138:
1120:
1119:
1096:
1068:
1037:
1019:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
948:David Eppstein
935:
897:
896:
887:
870:
837:
820:
794:
776:
775:
774:
752:
742:David Eppstein
707:
653:
652:
651:
641:David Eppstein
596:
595:
574:
573:
544:
534:David Eppstein
516:
515:
504:David Eppstein
494:
493:
468:
451:
433:
432:
408:
368:
367:
304:
243:
242:
237:
227:
222:
205:
202:
201:
97:
86:
81:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1149:
1137:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1122:
1121:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1109:
1104:
1100:
1097:
1095:
1092:
1090:
1089:Donna Spencer
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1069:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1054:
1050:
1045:
1041:
1038:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1020:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
993:
990:
989:
978:
975:
973:
972:Donna Spencer
967:
963:
959:
958:
957:
953:
949:
945:
944:
943:
938:
931:
930:
923:
919:
916:
915:
913:
909:
905:
901:
900:
899:
898:
895:
890:
883:
882:
875:
871:
869:
865:
861:
857:
853:
849:
845:
844:WP:MEATPUPPET
841:
838:
836:
832:
828:
824:
821:
818:
814:
810:
806:
802:
798:
795:
793:
789:
785:
780:
777:
773:
769:
765:
758:
757:Ursulageorges
753:
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
734:
732:
728:
727:UrsulaGeorges
723:
719:
715:
711:
708:
704:
700:
696:
692:
687:
683:
679:
675:
671:
668:
665:
661:
657:
654:
650:
646:
642:
637:
636:
633:
629:
625:
621:
616:
612:
608:
604:
601:
598:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
576:
575:
572:
567:
559:
558:
551:
548:
545:
543:
539:
535:
531:
528:
525:
521:
518:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
496:
495:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
469:
467:
463:
459:
455:
452:
450:
446:
442:
438:
435:
434:
430:
427:
425:
424:(Lets talk📧)
420:
414:
409:
406:
403:
401:
400:(Lets talk📧)
396:
390:
385:
384:
383:
382:
379:
377:
363:
359:
356:
353:
349:
345:
341:
338:
335:
332:
329:
326:
323:
320:
317:
313:
310:
309:Find sources:
305:
301:
297:
294:
288:
284:
280:
276:
271:
267:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
245:
241:
238:
235:
231:
228:
226:
223:
221:
218:
217:
216:
214:
209:
196:
192:
184:
180:
174:
168:
164:
158:
152:
148:
142:
138:
134:
132:
128:
122:
118:
117:
112:
108:
104:
103:
98:
95:
91:
90:
85:
82:
80:
79:
76:
75:
71:
70:
66:
65:
61:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1125:
1123:
1107:
1098:
1088:
1070:
1049:James Keener
1039:
1021:
991:
971:
925:
877:
873:
839:
822:
796:
779:Keep/Improve
778:
721:
717:
713:
709:
659:
655:
599:
553:
546:
519:
483:Celestina007
470:
453:
436:
423:
418:Megan Barris
399:
394:Megan Barris
371:
369:
357:
351:
343:
336:
330:
324:
318:
308:
295:
206:
194:
182:
173:sockpuppetry
166:
155:; suspected
150:
136:
124:
120:
114:
106:
100:
73:
68:
63:
58:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
1058:AlwaysInRed
962:Kj cheetham
872:I placed a
860:Kj cheetham
805:WP:Too soon
701:) has made
691:Dany_waller
678:Dany_waller
630:) has made
566:hoot hoot🦉
520:Weak delete
475:Scope_creep
375:scope_creep
334:free images
1075:WP:TOOSOON
1026:Xxanthippe
966:remind her
904:Xxanthippe
874:not a vote
852:WP:TOOSOON
809:Xxanthippe
738:WP:PROF#C8
714:Math Mamas
660:Math Mamas
524:WP:PROF#C1
107:discussion
1130:talk page
1099:Weak keep
725:outlets.-
163:canvassed
157:canvassed
116:consensus
59:King of ♥
37:talk page
1132:or in a
1079:Jessamyn
928:Eostrix
880:Eostrix
856:WP:NPROF
827:jraimbau
803:. Maybe
784:Jessamyn
699:contribs
628:contribs
584:TJMSmith
556:Eostrix
293:View log
234:glossary
195:username
189:{{subst:
183:username
177:{{subst:
167:username
161:{{subst:
151:username
145:{{subst:
39:or in a
1022:Comment
936:hoot🦉]
888:hoot🦉]
840:Comment
801:WP:Prof
437:Comment
340:WP refs
328:scholar
266:protect
261:history
211:New to
159:users:
54:WP:PROF
1113:(talk)
1081:&
992:Delete
848:WP:GNG
823:Delete
797:Delete
722:PRIMUS
718:PRIMUS
547:Delete
471:Delete
454:Delete
312:Google
270:delete
1083:Skome
674:Skome
620:Skome
607:Skome
355:JSTOR
316:books
300:Stats
287:views
279:watch
275:links
137:Note:
16:<
1062:talk
1040:Keep
1030:talk
1013:talk
952:talk
908:talk
864:talk
854:for
831:talk
813:talk
788:talk
768:talk
746:talk
731:talk
710:Keep
695:talk
682:talk
656:Keep
645:talk
624:talk
611:talk
600:Keep
588:talk
538:talk
508:talk
487:talk
462:talk
445:talk
348:FENS
322:news
283:logs
257:talk
253:edit
502:. —
362:TWL
291:– (
191:csp
187:or
179:csm
147:spa
121:not
1064:)
1032:)
1015:)
954:)
920:,
914:.
910:)
866:)
858:.
833:)
815:)
807:.
790:)
770:)
748:)
712:.
697:•
689:—
684:)
647:)
626:•
618:—
613:)
590:)
582:.
564:🦉
540:)
510:)
489:)
481:.
473:—
464:)
447:)
415:.
391:.
342:)
285:|
281:|
277:|
273:|
268:|
264:|
259:|
255:|
197:}}
185:}}
175::
169:}}
153:}}
143::
1060:(
1036:.
1028:(
1011:(
950:(
939:)
933:(
906:(
891:)
885:(
862:(
829:(
819:.
811:(
786:(
766:(
759::
755:@
744:(
729:(
693:(
680:(
643:(
639:—
622:(
609:(
586:(
568:)
561:(
536:(
506:(
485:(
460:(
443:(
366:)
358:·
352:·
344:·
337:·
331:·
325:·
319:·
314:(
306:(
303:)
296:·
289:)
251:(
236:)
232:(
199:.
193:|
181:|
165:|
149:|
74:♠
69:♣
64:♦
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
