261:, by reliable sources not having an interest in doing so. That means more than a name drop or passing mention like the one listed below, it means coverage in some depth. Since article material must be verifiable via reliable sources, if that's not the case, we just don't have enough to write an article from. If he's covered more extensively in the future, the article can always be started at that time, but we always follow that source material coming about, not
504:
I know it looks suspicious, but after doing some research, it's actually held, nominates attend to a venue and they celebrate and give physical awards the winner - that doesn't stabilize their notability either, but it's covered by news, paparazzis, recorded and transmitted via local TV. I made a
205:
I can't find any reliable source material for this at all. Searches for "cash lewis", "cash lewis" rapper, etc., turn up nothing other than blogs and some self-published material. (Note that Google will automatically recognize "L3wis" as synonymous with "Lewis".) I therefore see no indication of
231:
and found that it has 10,000+ hits just of his name. I think it's good (not notable) but passable, when the article has charted one song (but did not received recognition nor coverage) and gaining mainstream recognition with over 350,000 views (I am not saying this marks his
257:. It doesn't, though, and there's no space between being notable and being passable as an article subject. (iTunes is not a national chart, by the way, as Apple is not a nation.) What's ultimately required for notability is that the subject have been reasonably extensively
294:, I'm gonna still providing references as the conversation goes on - I know this doesn't prove the notability but somehow collaborate with the process. The iTunes (US) chart, is actually a chart, not because iTunes is not a country or Apple a nation but to US (
603:
from one of their past webpage. HYPE Magazine is the #1 Digital/Print
Magazine Outlet Since 2002. The link previously listed is an interview for Cash L3wis. As I see no further details/comments from any other contributors; means that there are no arguments.
667:
I can only guess you have no clue what "civil" means. Calling an award obscure is an observation as to its widespread influence, or lack thereof. I can't be "incivil" to an award, it isn't a human, so your statement makes absolutely no sense.
797:
Thank you for providing the correct link. However, I still see no evidence that this is "the most notable music blog" other than a claim made in the banner ad at top of their website that they are #1. Indeed, in their
174:
735:
discussing the subject; I seriously question whether "Hype
Magazine" (hosted by Blogspot), which is mentioned by the keep !voter, qualifies as one. There isn't enough out there to justify a
464:
626:
in spite of a lot of chatter and blog posts and obscure awards, what I don't see is a clear path passing the criteria for inclusion. There simply isn't enough meat on this bone.
127:
444:
168:
491:
be "Entrepreneurs On The Move", but then again that may be another group entirely (a different blog with another logo). Looks suspiciously like a PR site though. —
542:
773:
506:
487:
The EOTM awards do not appear to be notable awards. I can't determine what they even are. Their site doesn't even say what "EOTM" stands for! It
349:
352:
510:
601:
134:
291:
739:
article. I do not believe the award nomination mentioned in the article is an indicator of notability, either. Possibly a case of
17:
100:
95:
104:
189:
156:
87:
813:
754:
228:
871:
253:
Certainly it's a common mistake. Indeed, thinking number of Google hits matters toward that is so common that it
40:
836:- to admin or non admin, please don't close this discussion. I am getting more references in order to make this
150:
647:
Please remain civil. The awards are not obscure. Just because you don't know about it, it doesn't makes it
675:
633:
57:
867:
36:
146:
852:
822:
792:
763:
711:
680:
662:
638:
616:
591:
554:
529:
499:
476:
456:
435:
406:
366:
335:
310:
271:
248:
212:
69:
91:
65:
776:
is the official article from the OFFICIAL WEBSITE. Of the most notable music blog. Which can claim
182:
196:
849:
789:
724:
708:
659:
613:
587:
550:
526:
432:
403:
379:
363:
332:
307:
266:
245:
207:
53:
514:
83:
75:
354:
as synonymous. The name is stylized for a reason. The search results are completely different.
740:
669:
627:
472:
452:
262:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
866:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
694:
565:
496:
254:
61:
416:
382:(2. Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart), it charted on the
162:
842:
837:
782:
777:
736:
705:
652:
606:
583:
546:
519:
425:
396:
356:
325:
316:
300:
295:
238:
227:
and a
Knowledge contributor, I found this appropriate to a Knowledge Article. I did
732:
468:
448:
121:
802:, they refer to themselves as "Full Service Marketing & PR Company". Hmm. --
492:
283:
287:
697:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
568:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
804:
745:
727:, the claim of a single on the iTunes chart indicates that the subject
799:
383:
220:
I am a little bit confused with the article too. But after research,
860:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
52:. There just isn't the reliable sources out there to pass
465:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
505:
Google Search query and found photos, you can see them
117:
113:
109:
731:
be notable. In this case, however, there is a lack of
704:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
181:
513:. And also found an introduction to the same subject
56:
or the other criteria at the moment. I am willing to
582:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
378:- I understand the situation, but it someway meets
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
874:). No further edits should be made to this page.
445:list of California-related deletion discussions
195:
8:
600:Also, I found an article from HYPE Magazine
541:Note: This debate has been included in the
463:Note: This debate has been included in the
443:Note: This debate has been included in the
278:Maybe the Google Search do not clarify his
543:list of Music-related deletion discussions
540:
462:
442:
423:. Will be updating this over time. Thanks
282:. In the process I found an article about
577:We need more contributors to collaborate
263:try to predict its future availability
394:and give me 2 months to complete it.
7:
415:I was looking in Google and found:
386:' Charts but not received coverage
348:Also, Google does not sees "L3WIS"
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
419:and I don't know if this is
1:
853:21:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
823:18:09, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
793:21:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
764:18:52, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
712:13:13, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
681:21:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
663:21:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
639:17:17, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
617:18:30, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
592:23:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
555:23:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
530:00:49, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
500:18:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
477:15:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
457:15:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
436:16:53, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
407:15:08, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
367:18:30, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
336:00:49, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
311:18:44, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
272:05:05, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
249:03:55, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
213:14:12, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
70:07:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
60:the article if requested.}}
390:. Just please flag this as
319:, not lack of notability -
891:
517:. Tell me if I am wrong.
863:Please do not modify it.
222:a lover of hip-hop music
32:Please do not modify it.
315:This might be case of
808:
749:
575:Relisting comment:
225:(see my user page)
851:
806:
791:
747:
714:
661:
615:
594:
557:
528:
479:
459:
434:
405:
365:
334:
309:
270:
255:got written about
247:
236:) just passable.
226:
211:
882:
865:
848:
845:
821:
818:
809:
788:
785:
762:
759:
750:
733:reliable sources
703:
699:
658:
655:
612:
609:
581:
570:
525:
522:
431:
428:
402:
399:
362:
359:
331:
328:
306:
303:
269:
244:
241:
224:
210:
200:
199:
185:
137:
125:
107:
48:The result was
34:
890:
889:
885:
884:
883:
881:
880:
879:
878:
872:deletion review
861:
843:
820:
814:
805:
803:
783:
761:
755:
746:
744:
692:
653:
607:
563:
520:
426:
397:
357:
326:
301:
298:) actually is.
239:
142:
133:
98:
82:
79:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
888:
886:
877:
876:
856:
855:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
812:
767:
766:
753:
717:
716:
715:
701:
700:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
642:
641:
620:
619:
597:
596:
595:
579:
578:
572:
571:
560:
559:
558:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
460:
440:
439:
438:
410:
409:
372:
371:
370:
369:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
290:that mentions
203:
202:
139:
78:
73:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
887:
875:
873:
869:
864:
858:
857:
854:
850:
847:
846:
839:
835:
832:
831:
824:
819:
817:
810:
801:
796:
795:
794:
790:
787:
786:
779:
775:
771:
770:
769:
768:
765:
760:
758:
751:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
719:
718:
713:
710:
707:
702:
698:
696:
691:
690:
682:
679:
678:
673:
672:
666:
665:
664:
660:
657:
656:
650:
646:
645:
644:
643:
640:
637:
636:
631:
630:
625:
622:
621:
618:
614:
611:
610:
602:
599:
598:
593:
589:
585:
580:
576:
573:
569:
567:
562:
561:
556:
552:
548:
544:
539:
531:
527:
524:
523:
516:
512:
508:
503:
502:
501:
498:
494:
490:
486:
483:
482:
481:
480:
478:
474:
470:
466:
461:
458:
454:
450:
446:
441:
437:
433:
430:
429:
422:
418:
414:
413:
412:
411:
408:
404:
401:
400:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
374:
373:
368:
364:
361:
360:
353:
350:
347:
337:
333:
330:
329:
322:
318:
314:
313:
312:
308:
305:
304:
297:
296:United States
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
268:
267:Seraphimblade
264:
260:
256:
252:
251:
250:
246:
243:
242:
235:
230:
229:some research
223:
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
209:
208:Seraphimblade
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:Find sources:
140:
136:
132:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
72:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
862:
859:
841:
833:
815:
781:
756:
728:
720:
693:
676:
670:
651:
648:
634:
628:
623:
605:
574:
564:
518:
488:
484:
424:
420:
395:
391:
387:
375:
355:
351:and "LEWIS"
324:
320:
299:
279:
258:
237:
233:
221:
206:notability.
204:
192:
186:
178:
171:
165:
159:
153:
143:
130:
49:
47:
31:
28:
800:Twitter bio
725:WP:MUSICBIO
421:good enough
380:WP:MUSICBIO
284:Wiz Khalifa
169:free images
54:WP:MUSICBIO
741:WP:TOOSOON
392:refimprove
292:Cash L3wis
288:Amber Rose
280:notability
234:notability
84:Cash L3wis
76:Cash L3wis
62:Ricky81682
868:talk page
469:• Gene93k
449:• Gene93k
37:talk page
870:or in a
844:Karlhard
784:Karlhard
772:My bad,
706:RoySmith
695:Relisted
654:Karlhard
608:Karlhard
584:Karlhard
566:Relisted
547:Karlhard
521:Karlhard
427:Karlhard
398:Karlhard
358:Karlhard
327:Karlhard
302:Karlhard
240:Karlhard
128:View log
39:or in a
838:notable
834:Comment
649:obscure
485:Comment
175:WP refs
163:scholar
101:protect
96:history
778:WP:GNG
737:WP:BLP
723:. Per
721:Delete
709:(talk)
671:Dennis
629:Dennis
624:Delete
493:Gwalla
384:iTunes
317:WP:B2B
147:Google
105:delete
58:userfy
50:Delete
489:might
259:noted
190:JSTOR
151:books
135:Stats
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
807:Kinu
774:this
748:Kinu
743:. --
588:talk
551:talk
515:here
511:here
509:and
507:here
497:Talk
473:talk
453:talk
417:this
376:Keep
286:and
183:FENS
157:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
66:talk
729:may
388:yet
321:yet
197:TWL
126:– (
840:.
780:.
677:2¢
674:-
635:2¢
632:-
590:)
553:)
545:.
495:|
475:)
467:.
455:)
447:.
323:.
265:.
177:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
68:)
816:c
811:/
757:c
752:/
586:(
549:(
471:(
451:(
201:)
193:·
187:·
179:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
149:(
141:(
138:)
131:·
124:)
86:(
64:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.